Are there 20,000 or 20,000,000 refugees in Israel?
Knesset wants to ban asylum seekers entering via Egypt, but activists say IDF exaggerates numbers.
By Dana Weiler-Polak Tags: Egypt Israel news IDFThere is growing support in the Knesset for a controversial government bill that aims to prevent asylum seekers from entering via the Israeli-Egyptian border. But human rights groups charge that this support stems from false information from the Israel Defense Forces.
The bill, which has passed its first reading, states that anyone who enters Israel without a permit, including refugees, will be subject to immediate expulsion or imprisonment. The human rights organizations say this violates Israel's commitments under the international Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Two weeks ago, the Knesset Committee on Foreign Workers toured the southern border, led by Brig. Gen. Harel Knafo, a senior officer in the IDF Southern Command. The tour was preparation for today's committee discussion on the bill.
But the statement the committee issued afterward included what human rights groups charged was false data. Moreover, when one such group, the Hotline for Migrant Workers, asked permission to attend today's meeting to present what it said were the true figures, it was turned down. The reason? Since the asylum seekers in question were not in Israel, they were none of the organization's business.
The hotline's workers said they were shocked by this decision. "Since the Committee on Foreign Workers was established, there has not been a meeting to which human rights organizations were not invited," said one. "Apparently, they are afraid to hear our data: that there are not 1 million migrants waiting to enter, and that this figure is not based on real information, just hatred of foreigners."
The committee statement had claimed that "a million migrant workers from Africa are in the process of being 'absorbed' in Sinai and are waiting to infiltrate into Israel."
Bill Van Oswald, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, also insisted that this was nonsense. There are 750,000 Sudanese - the largest group of asylum seekers - in Egypt, he said, but most have been there for years and have no desire to leave.
"Almost all the migrants who came to Israel are people who requested asylum at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees office in Cairo, waited for years for their situation to improve, and lost hope," he said. "Today, there are around 20,000 people in this situation, and they are the relevant ones. Certainly not 1 million."
An information bulletin issued by the UNHCR office in Cairo in September said there were 41,423 asylum seekers in Egypt at that time, including 22,689 from Sudan and 1,638 from Eritrea. Of these, it said, around 10,000 have not contacted the office in recent years, which implies that they probably have moved to Israel.
Human rights groups also took issue with the Knesset committee's assertion that "only a small and marginal fraction of the migrants that infiltrate are refugees." Since the state has not bothered to consider the applications of a single Sudanese or Eritrean asylum seeker in recent years, they said, it has no way of knowing whether this is true.
Sudanese applicants are not considered because Sudan is formally at war with Israel, so Israel has no legal obligation to accept Sudanese refugees. Eritrean applicants are being ignored because Israel fears that recognizing them as refugees would endanger its diplomatic ties with Eritrea. While these are not the only African countries whose nationals have entered Israel, both are noted for abusing their citizens, so their nationals might well meet the criteria for recognition as refugees.
According to UNHCR's annual report for 2008, which is based on information submitted by member states, Israel had 9,137 officially recognized refugees within its borders as of the end of that year and 4,631 asylum seekers whose applications were still under consideration.
MK Yaakov Katz (National Union), who chairs the Committee on Foreign Workers, is currently abroad, but his aide said the committee statement was based on IDF data, and "if someone says the numbers are different, we'll accept that."
Regarding the exclusion of human rights groups from today's meeting, he explained, "We aren't discussing workers in Israel, but those across the border who are interested in entering illegally."
However, he added, the numbers are not really important, as "we can't approve the absorption of even 20,000 people."
The IDF said in response: "The committee examining the problem of foreign workers conducted a tour two weeks ago of the southern border of the State of Israel. The committee received precise, reliable figures on [asylum seekers'] infiltration in recent years, and on potential trends in the future."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Don't be so quick to judge, you might become a refugee yourself
I stand in defiance against millions of ranting self-righteous, hysterical NGO-niks. Israel cannot and should not have more on its plate that it can take. It is the most bashed country on earth. And it is totally unfair. It has to care about its own problems. There are vast, comfortable countries living in conditions to absorb refugees. Isral can simply not. And all the politically correct tyranny that usurps Human Rights only for some, and against others, should be rejected.
Let it be known throught Sudan ,don't be bashful
Either you are ignorant or you choose word to undermine. Jews are a nation that have a specific religion, like most classic ancient people. Just like French people have a right to want France to be French; Jews have a right to want Israel to be Jewish.
what you are saying is the more people we migrate in Israel less land available for the palestinian period! Guess again Palestinian will have is owns state like it or not!!
in Egypt,sudan or Africa.They know that the rule of law rules in Israel and not Sharia or rule by dictators.Israel cannot open its borders just like the US can not open its borders or any country cannot open its borders. Israel must protect their citizen because the world won't in any way
It really does boil down to the basic question of whether the state of Israel is a state where a person's rights are determined by their religion, or not. And if it is the former, what is the difference between determining a person's rights by whether that person is born Jewish, or not, and determining a person's rights by whether that person is born White, or not? As late as the 1960's, determing rights by skin colour was tolerated for strategic purposes, by the 1970's, it was not. Are you so sure that in 10 years time, determining rights by religion will still be tolerated?
They are entering from Egypt, not Sudan. They come to Israel to look for work. We have enough unemployment and don't need them. Does any country in the world just throw open its borders and let everyone in?
refugees status is very complicated and it must be solved unanimus by all countries.
It truly is incredible how short of a memory our tribe has. Borders were sealed to Jews in the 1930s, and perhaps the nations in question then were also telling themselves the same thing.....no room, no infrastructure, no money etc, etc. This is a blot on our race, where it seems clearer every day that ethnic/religious purity is the order of the day. To say that Israel can not absorb 20K refugees is utter nonsense. We wish for 5 times that number of Jews to come. And of course the country can afford to resettle them. the nation is wealthy with huge amounts of waste. Every day the homeland loses more and more of its soul.
Either Israel is a Jewish or it is not a state worth saving. Israel needs to acknowledge its demographic vulnerability and act accordingly.