• Published 00:56 13.08.10
  • Latest update 00:56 13.08.10

Anshel Pfeffer / Israel suffers from evoking Holocaust to justify militant policies

Israel will probably succeed in preventing Ahmadinejad from building a bomb, but if in doing so its leaders continue to invoke Auschwitz repeatedly, then we are all losers.

By Anshel Pfeffer

Not long ago, I was walking through one of the antique sales areas in London with a friend. One of the shops specialized in military paraphernalia and on a corner of a shelf, a pile of Wehrmacht Knight's Cross medals caught my eye. The shop lady informed me that they were much sought after collectors items and upon further inspection, I saw at the back of the shelf a pile of red cloth that ominously looked like swastika flags, folded so as to show just about enough to attract the discerning enthusiast, and at the very back a strip of blue and white cloth with a yellow triangle and a number on it. I couldn't tell whether it was an authentic concentration camp uniform - somehow it seemed too clean - but I felt too physically sick to remain there and left the shop for some fresh air.

Yad Vashem Holocaust museum in Jerusalem

An Israeli visiting the Hall of Names at the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum in Jerusalem, Sunday, April 11, 2010.

Photo by: AP

An hour later, we were browsing through some other items at a stall further down the road selling Chinese souvenirs. I leafed through an English edition of Mao's Little Red Book. "You don't seem so disturbed right now," said my friend, "even though Mao probably killed many more human beings that Hitler did."

She had a point. I was disgusted by the thought of people buying Nazi flags and medals, but the thought of owning Mao's book seemed rather cool. But then we seem to have a sick national fetish for any kind of Holocaust relic.

This week a wooden hut in what was once the concentration camp of Majdanek on the outskirts of Lublin in Poland was badly damaged by fire, and thousands of shoes of camp inmates were destroyed. Israeli officials said that it was "a tragic loss" and I couldn't help but thinking that at a place where over 79,000 human beings had been industrially slaughtered, the destruction of some old shoes is hardly a tragedy.

I saw the shoes at Majdanek 20 years ago, as a high school student on a trip to Poland. Actually, Majdanek was the very first stop on our route, before Auschwitz, Sobibor, Treblinka and the Warsaw Ghetto, because it is the best preserved of all the camps in Poland, with the crematorium and gas chamber still intact and all those huts filled with personal belongings of the victims. They take high-schoolers there at the beginning for some shock treatment, in the hope that will make them act in a solemn way throughout the trip. (It doesn't always work though. As harrowing as the visits to the camps are, the raucousness at the hotel in the evening goes up a few notches. And why not? )

I know that many visitors have been greatly moved by looking at the huge piles of shoes, which are supposed to emphasize in some way the millions killed, but I wasn't taken in by the numbers. Somehow all the black, nearly identical footwear seemed to blur into each other, and all I sensed was the oppressive smell in the close, hot hut. What did move me finally was when I saw at the edge of one pile a woman's red sandal, with the decorative strap still intact. A remnant with a hint of individuality. I can still see that sandal in my mind very clearly today, and often think of the woman who wore it. How did she turn up at a death camp with such a useless shoe?

Tens of thousands of such shoes still remain in Majdanek, Auschwitz and other camps that are no memorials, but apparently some of the more delicate exhibits, clothes, the piles of hair shorn from the victims, the cardboard suitcases they used to bring a few belongings to "resettlement" and such stuff is falling to pieces, and millions are needed for their complex restoration. But will this be money well spent?

How important is it for us to see physical remnants of the Holocaust? While there have been voices in Israel in the past questioning the value of the high school trips to Poland, mainly from the left wing as students tend to come back infused with nationalism, not only have they continued at a greater pace, but the practice has spread also to the army. Hundreds of IDF officers now participate annually in "Witnesses in Uniform" delegations to Poland - one armored battalion commander told me recently that "whenever I want to try and keep an officer in the service and he's hesitating, I send him on one of the delegations to Poland. That usually does the trick."

The Holocaust is also very present in the IDF, on the office walls of many generals and colonels who put up the framed photograph of three Israeli F-15s flying over the Auschwitz crematoria in 2003. Jeffrey Goldberg picked up on that detail in the interviews he did in Israel for a piece he wrote in this month's The Atlantic, predicting that Israel will almost certainly carry out a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities by June 2011. The main reason Israeli leaders gave him for such a decision - preventing a second Holocaust.

There are good and valid reasons for and against attacking Iran, but as long as the Holocaust is part of the equation, those who have to make the call will never be able to reach a reasoned decision.

It seems that in the national Israeli psyche, backed up by the education system and the IDF, the only worthwhile lesson of the Holocaust is that Israel should be strong and defend itself, and the only purpose of defending Israel is that there should not be another Holocaust.

Israel will probably succeed in preventing Ahmadinejad from building a bomb, but if in doing so its leaders continue to invoke Auschwitz repeatedly, then we are all losers. Israelis will lose the ability and ambition to try and turn their country into something more than just a safe haven, and their senses will become even more dulled to feeling the pain and suffering of others.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 42. 10 0
    Using the Holocaust
    • Mannstein (USA)
    • 14.08.10
    • 03:33

    Which Holocaust is he talking about? Is it the one where no Hitler order exists to gas the Jews? Or the one where the gas chambers of Auschwitz were built by the Russians after the war? Or maybe the one where there was an alleged ramp selection even though the camp had a modern hospital to take care of sick inmates? Or the one where the Nazis tatooed the Jews before having them killed?

  • 41. 9 0
    Attacking Iran
    • Peter
    • 13.08.10
    • 21:22

    According to the author, "There are good and valid reasons for and against attacking Iran". I'm sure many Iranians and Arabs think they have a better reason to attack Israel. You're losing your support around the world and every time you carry out another massacre, you lose more support. If you keep it up, in 20 years you won't even have the USA as an ally.

  • 40. 0 0
    Shoa is not the private property of the writer
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 13.08.10
    • 21:09

    most jews, be it in israel or not, consider the shoa to be the defininng moment of their history. pfeffer does not own the shoa.

  • 39. 7 0
    Holocaust every day
    • Secular
    • 13.08.10
    • 21:04

    What an intelligent article. Because of the way the Holocaust has been used, it has lost its potency for me. Some Israelis are misusing the memory of the dead to defend undefensible policies.

  • 38. 2 12
    Anshel's article
    • ernie
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:51

    When the holocaust denying, Israeli-threatening man in Iran ceases his ignorant and bellicose rants, then, perhaps, there will be no need to invoke Auschwitz. However, history should not be ignored.

  • 37. 13 3
    Using the Holocaust to promote one's political goal is obscene
    • Allegra
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:23

    The way the right wing constantly used the Holocaust to push forward its own political agenda is simply obscene. The Holocaust is something that should never, ever be used for political means.

  • 36. 2 15
    This is the same author who said "Don't Fast on Tisha b'Av". Who can anything he says seriously?
    • Anshel
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:08

    His writings are just a waste of space. Let someone with something to say write here.

  • 35. 7 19
    How dare this author say that we suffer from evoking the Holocaust to justify militant policies
    • GershonBP
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:43

    Now even our own people want to forget the Holocaust. How dare this author say that we suffer from evoking the Holocaust to justify militant policies (like trying to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon). The author of this article is a disgrace to himself, to the People of Israel, to the State of Israel, and to people of good will the world over.

  • 34. 14 1
    Invoke Holocaust Memories to Remind Us How to Treat Other Peoples
    • Vladek
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:20

    The Holocaust should always remind us of the prejudices, injustices and scapegoats that are invoked in the name of security. German Nazism aroused theirrational fears and passions of a whole people. This goes on today under many disguises, some of which affects us directly.

  • 33. 4 9
    Jews were eradicated simply because they were Jews or had a drop of Jewish blood...
    • Georges
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:08

    Jews are not the only people who experienced a slaughter in history, but they were rooted out for slaughter to be entirely wiped out. Not because they were opposing some government or other people or because they had some kind of land conflict or were involved in a war..Simply because they were Jews. Which other people lost some 50% of its population with entire communities wiped out.....simply because of who they were ore even who their great great grandparents... A drop of 'Jewish blood' was enough. They were compared to rats and cockroaches to be eradicated. All killing is not the same...Jews have been at the forefornt of protests against racism or other mass killing...Certainly they have not been less sensitive than other people...

  • 32. 2 5
    wrong to feel any emotion for ones ancestors?
    • ky
    • 13.08.10
    • 15:41

    why should Mr Pfeffer have felt just as traumatised bat the sight of Mao's Little Red Book? Is it not natural for a person to have more feeling for their own people.? maybe I am wrong about it but our forefathers who died in the Holocaust were our grandparents , uncles, aunts cousins. why is wrong to feel more sadness for them ?

  • 31. 1 3
    Israel and the Holocaust
    • karen
    • 13.08.10
    • 15:22

    The author thinks Israel is nothing more than a "safe haven"? Israel has a vibrant economy, is a leader in many fields, and transcended the limits of a "safe haven" decades ago. To trivialize both Israel and the Holocaust by claiming one is merely a response does a disservice to both.

    • 2 0
      Not sure
      • Dave
      • 13.08.10
      • 21:16

      I think he's saying that Israel is in danger of becoming nothing more than a safe haven, not that this is all it is or should be.

  • 30. 2 14
    So did you hear the story about the moron whose finger was severed by an electric fan?
    • Curious American
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:32

    Someone asked him how that could happen with the wire shield around the fan. Easy, the moron said, like this -- and he proceeded to stick another finger through the wire basket into the spinning fan blades. Isn't that right Anshel Pfeffer? Isn't that how you lost 2 fingers?

  • 29. 3 9
    It is not always an excuse
    • Kel
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:31

    What is incomprehensible to most non Jews is that many Jews/Israelis feel a deep sense of insecurity as a result of what happened during WWII. Many non Jews mock Jews for this, but that doesn't mean the feelling aren't real

  • 28. 4 3
    The Europeans protect the memory of the holocaust
    • Furlong
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:27

    as much as the Jews. To their credit the European nations are the ones who have passed laws against holocaust denial, who have made a point of remembering - it is their history; they know what happened.

  • 27. 3 5
    Contrary to the general perception, the Holocaust is very little pronounced in Israeli's daily life, and much more in Europe
    • Israeli
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:20

    The basic reason for Europe's concern with the Holocaust is that Europe never admitted the simple and true reason for its occurrence. Europe is so much afraid to deal with it, that it blames secondary causes such as racism, the Nazi party, and others. The truth is that most Europeans were not Nazis, nor racists, yet most Europeans supported the Holocaust. The basic reason for the Holocaust is deeply rooted in Europe's Christianity. It is the fabricated story that blames the Jews for a murder committed by Romans on a Jew called Jesus. This story was concocted in order to let Emperor Constantine to formally embrace Christianity (which was then a part of Judaism) by the Roman empire. The purpose was to explain how Rome can be Christian after it murdered Jesus, and the solution was to blame the Jews themselves. This was done in Nicea (Nicene) conference in 325 century. This politically convenient story is the real basis for antisemitism. The only way to correct this is to go back to the ways of original Christians which were actually Jews. In the USA Christianity move in the direction of returning to the roots of early Christianity. In Europe they don't. Europe prefers to create the EU walls around them (saying religion is not constitutional yet rejecting Turkey out). This wont save Europe's conscience. A young European child will not believe that Christianity had nothing to do with the Holocaust, and honest European Christians must be ashamed of their latest history. You can go and check by yourself how well is the Christian religion doing in the youth of Europe. In the Holocaust, Europe managed to kill its own Christianity, and to revive the Jewish people.

    • 0 1
      You are right but
      • kia
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:09

      it is always very easy to judge about others after the fact. You mentioned that it was not just Nazism but European citizens who supported Holocaust. But if the very same Europeans today say that we want to kick muslims out of Europe, it is very likely that you as an Israeli support it and justify and rationalize it. Europeans did the same.

  • 26. 4 4
    The same world that stood by...
    • Jesse the Cynik
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:20

    ...and did nothing (except of course when it directly affected them) as the European jews were being led to their deaths is finding it hard to understand why Israel sometimes acts the way it does. I find that very interesting, and disturbing.

  • 25. 0 3
    evoking the holocaust
    • david
    • 13.08.10
    • 13:06

    It is essential that the Holocaust is never forgotten. But does it need to be invoked always as a warning? In the sphere of films and books it is now refreshing to see that instead of being the core theme the Holocaust is 'slipped in' to the story lines as just background fact! This is probably the better way to keep it alive. Most people do not want to hear about it all the time but are happy to ingest it as part of some wider context. That is a healthier way of keeping the memory going to the next generations and almost without realising it it is serving still as a warning!

  • 24. 13 3
    Remembering
    • DaveC
    • 13.08.10
    • 12:43

    a thought-provoking piece. Israel has used the Holocaust for 60 years to bolster support and it has worked. The world has changed. Using the Holocaust this way cannot be a long term strategy: it is too expensive (not just in cash) and won't succeed. Demonising Islam, as Europe demonised Jews, is not a recipe for peace with justice.

  • 23. 17 8
    Our excuses
    • ussishkin
    • 13.08.10
    • 11:53

    As a victim's nephew and namesake I have to say that I am tired of our constant excuse, justification, for whatever we do - that we were victims of the holocaust. We were history's victims. But even though that is true, we cannot also be victimisers. We abuse ourselves and others when we refuse to be accountable for our actions. Until we mature enough to accept responsibility for what we do, we will remain a blighted nation. Until we are able to step out from the shadows of our past, stop pandering to our innate paranoia often tapped into by our political leaders, we will continue to fail to fulfill our fullest potential. War and violence will be the future we pass on to our children. We have to learn finally what are the responsibilities that come with nation statehood, and not excuse our defiance of the values we hoped we would reflect in creating Israel, by invoking the Holocaust.

  • 22. 8 1
    Shallow Minds Produce Stupidity
    • Joe
    • 13.08.10
    • 11:41

    The "alleged"nuclear capability developed by Israel gives Israel a strategic advantage,first and foremost. It does not require any historical justification any more than does the development of a strong army. Although the Shoah is considered by many, learned and unlearned, to be an event sui generis, there are Jewish religious thinkers whose view it as part of a series of cataclysmic event commencing with destruction of the Two Temples and the exile of the tribes. Since the knowledge of Jewish history of the deligitimizers of Zionism, the Jewish state and its people are limited to their familiarity with the 20th century, they tend to focus exclusively on the recent holocaust, ignoring 3000 years of history. The currebt use of the holocaust by our military and educational leadership is cynical and unworthy of this generation, displaying a poverty of profound thinking.

  • 21. 54 13
    There is no evidence that Iran wants to destroy Israel
    • Miggy
    • 13.08.10
    • 10:37

    This reacting to everything as if it's an existential threat has made Israel a psycho state. God help your neighbours.

    • 1 3
    • 2 12
      Are You Serious
      • Brazen
      • 13.08.10
      • 16:09

      miggy, what does I Want To Wipe Israel Off The Map mean? Please Clarify .

    • 4 0
      answering Brazen
      • René - Holland
      • 13.08.10
      • 20:44

      The famous, or rather notorious, speech of Ahmedinjad referred to earlier made remarks by Khomeiny, in which he said “the regime over Jerusalem will be dispersed in the wind of time” or some equivalent of this Persian saying. With this saying he pointed at the similar disappearance of the Communist regime in the former Soviet Union, and the end Apartheid in South Africa. Neither changes involved violence, let alone genocide. Through some clumsy translations and faulty interpretations by western journalist this became the text that “Israel should be wiped off the map”. Which was of course a gift from heaven for those who need a excuse to bomb Iran.

    • 2 0
      Brazen
      • Maggie
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:19

      He said he wants to wipe Zionism away, not Judaism. Jews in Iran are treated well - and believe it or not he is not anti-Jewish.

  • 20. 7 29
    Anshel Pfeffer should go back to school, he obviously missed a few lessons
    • Uzi
    • 13.08.10
    • 09:51

    Forget the fact that every several months or so Anshel comes out with another article which sounds word for word like a Neo-Nazi attack against holocaust remembrence. Anshel has obviously not learned the lessons of the holocaust. Even the tiny fact that it was a planned extermination of a people based on their religion or "race". Perhaps if he had compared it to the Armenian genocide, or to the genocide in Rwanda he would not come out sounding so ignorant. Amazingly, he was "touched" by one woman's red sandal, but all the other shoes didn't seem to register with him at all. Perhaps Anshel could have taken a moment to realize that every shoe over there belonged to an individual, not just the pretty red sandal. Perhaps then the other "identical footwear" would not have "blurred into each other" for him. Perhaps then it wouldn't seem to him like a "national fetish".

    • 5 1
      Meeoooowww!!!
      • Balwinder
      • 13.08.10
      • 12:09

      And what propelled you to such morally supreme spheres? Look everybody, Uzi didn't skimp on his Holocaust curriculum. 50 out of 50 classes attendended, well done mein giter. Coming from a family that was partly murdered in the Holocaust, I'm less pious about discussing what is in fact a part of politics: The invocation of Hitler. Yesterday it was Saddam Hussein, today it's Ahmadinejad. Instead of catching Israelis for not being flabbergasted sufficiently by the sight of tens of thousands of shoes, how about doing something jewish, something compassionate, something righteous about victims of today's wars, go and volunteer in Ruanda, Kenya, Tanzania, China, South America...Or go to the Hamburg municipality and take the swastika out of the handrail in the main staircase, that's still there, isn't it? Otherwise - why not just take a deep breath and then do something befitting your horizon - like saving a kitten in a tree? Giten Shabbes, moin Oytzer.

    • 0 2
      Uzi ..Well said..And if I may..The Dead are gone.But those shoes are>
      • Ross
      • 13.08.10
      • 21:13

      Those shoes are "TANGIBLE".A reminder of what occured.We can see,even perhaps touch it.Can we touch the dead who are gone up the chimney? I am disgusted even to have to remind Anshel on this very tiny,but important aspect.

  • 19. 14 11
    results of shoa
    • axel s. - germany
    • 13.08.10
    • 09:39

    i wish we would have taken other consequences than just defend israel. the shoa is over. and we dont care over the little genocides over the world. where r the multinational peace troops to prevent any of them ? for my oppinion the grandchildren of the victims r as sellfish as the grandchildren of the nazis. our responsibility is just a farce. we prevent nothin. we r just glad that it wouldnt happen to us.

  • 18. 29 5
    It is disrespect for the innocent people
    • Musti
    • 13.08.10
    • 09:36

    Any government's trick or polemics to use the sad event of holocaus for their own politics is a big disrespect of the memory of the victims of the holocaust.

    • 7 1
      thank you
      • luna
      • 13.08.10
      • 17:07

      for speaking out what is rarely heard in israel. when i say something good about arab people/ culture, some israelis insult me, saying i am hitler. it makes me cry my grandparents were jews from germany and it is a shame we are not allowed to say anything...for the palestinian minority...it takes my energy away

  • 17. 24 71
    hasbarah........
    • charlie ben smith
    • 13.08.10
    • 09:12

    Israel is an embattled country. They rely very heavily on U.S. support. So they have developed a very sophisticated system of propaganda. They don't call it propaganda. They call it hasbarah. It is the only country I know of in the world that refers to propaganda as explanation. The Ministry of Propaganda is the Ministry of Explanation. The idea being that our position on everything is so obviously correct that if we only explain it to people, they will see that it is right.

  • 16. 7 4
  • 15. 12 12
    The Problem is we evoke the Holocaust to Justify the States Excistance
    • Paul
    • 13.08.10
    • 08:46

    if only we would Justify our existence on our religious and Historic Connection like "The Cave of the Patriarchs, The Temple Mount and all the uncountable sites and historic proofs of our relation to the land, then our actions to defend our rites (be it forceful on the attacker) will be accepted by us the world and especially the Arabs. Only When the Jewish State has that consciousness will True Peace Reign!!!

    • 4 4
      and i wonder every time
      • axel s. - germany
      • 13.08.10
      • 09:30

      today its not about israel right to exists. because its over, its sure. every mayor gov accept u. thefew arabs that dont were beatin in the 60s/ 70s. noone wants or is able to crush israel. the only way i can imagine its an iranian nuke at cost of iranitself.coldwar

    • 7 1
      omg
      • josh
      • 13.08.10
      • 10:43

      becoming more religiously fanatical will solve the regions problems. the religious mind at work

  • 14. 52 8
  • 13. 65 3
    Too many russians and poles killed as well
    • kia
    • 13.08.10
    • 08:40

    Germans killed one third of population in Poland and 20 million russians as well but Poles and Russians never try to use atrocities commited by germans against them for justifying their actions and raise sympathy.

  • 12. 8 0
    Mindset
    • Terry
    • 13.08.10
    • 08:32

    The jews will always have the mindset to say.. Never Again...how sad !

  • 11. 54 10
    Crying the Holocaust
    • Ahmed
    • 13.08.10
    • 08:32

    Nuking Japan with 2 nuclear bombs was the biggest Holocaust. Killing more than 60 million people in which Jews were a small part is a Holocaust not only of Jews but the whole world. Recently American made Holocausts are plenty. Vietnam and Iraq being the biggest Holocausts. And as far as Muslims are concerned the biggest Holocaust of the century is the Palestinian Holocaust in the hands of Zionists.

  • 10. 33 5
    Excellent Article and a VALID POINT.
    • WEISS
    • 13.08.10
    • 08:01

    Cries of Pfeffer being a Self-Hating Jew will soon follow ...

  • 9. 8 17
    understanding history
    • ron
    • 13.08.10
    • 07:50

    Mao killed millions too. But being born Chinese was not a death sentence-being a political dissident could be. Being a Jewish political dissident was never the issue. Just being a Jew was an automatic death sentence in the Holocaust. You obviously did not learn or understand your history.

  • 8. 6 32
    Anshel you miss the point Jews lost as a % the most of its people ever!!
    • arthur
    • 13.08.10
    • 07:14

    Anshel you use the same logic which neo nazi's, anti semites, Muslims and extreme lefties use!! They Jews should shut up as more people died in other conflicts but genocide means the extermination of a people and by that definition Mao did not commit genocide on his people nor Stalin on the Russian nor Hitler on the Russians nor Poles!!As a university professor Anshel I thought you would know that!! A pity you have to offend your people in such a manner and one last thing tell your Palestinian friends to stop abusing linking the conflict to the holocaust!! The few thousand deaths does not compare to the holocaust nor to what happens in Darfur!!

    • 7 1
      Percentages
      • Ana
      • 13.08.10
      • 17:00

      The Romani lost an even higher percentage of their population, yet one would be hard pressed to find anyone citing the Porajmos as a justification for bad behavior. (One would be hard pressed to find Europeans who even acknowledge how massive a crime the Porajmos was, for that matter.) No one needs to "shut up" about genocide - Jews have every right to still be furious and jumpy over the Shoah - but the crime loses its meaning if its victims turn around and use it as a weapon against others.

    • 9 0
      And the Roma?
      • BDS
      • 13.08.10
      • 17:15

      If you insist on pursuing a distasteful argument about who suffered more, then what about the Nazi killings of the Roma people? Smaller than other groups, but large in percentage terms.

  • 7. 4 36
    from the Holocaust the only lesson we learned is ;NEVER AGAIN;
    • Nitza
    • 13.08.10
    • 06:31

    apart from America itself, Israel still stands as the world's brightest model of national self-liberation based on ideals of individual responsibility and human freedom. Israel's ability to withstand Arab attempts to destroy it in one of the longest and most lopsided wars ever fought serves as an indelible testimony to the strength of democratic culture. Israel has to be gritty; otherwise it would not exist. Nevertheless, in the 1990's it too began to tire under the perpetual assault. In systematic and sustained terrorism, the Arabs discovered the first weapon that really works against a democracy, destroying the trust, the openness, of an open society, and exploiting its precious freedoms to expose its acute vulnerability. Here once again Israel has served as a test case. How well can democracies withstand this new form of all-out foreign aggression? We know from the past that the West paid dearly for ignoring Hitler's war against the Jews. One can only hope it will not pay as dearly for having ignored or underestimated for so long the Arab war against Israel and the Jews.

    • 24 2
      Those same Arabs
      • Kameel
      • 13.08.10
      • 10:30

      Are you talking about those same Arabs who harbored sympathy and refuge for Jews, and who put them in highest political and proffessional ranks among them. All of that and more, was the Arab stance before what the Jews did to Palesinian Arabs, or do you seem to forget everything But the Holocaucost which was not perpetrated by those Arabs

    • 27 1
      What did you expect the Palestinians to do?
      • Miggy
      • 13.08.10
      • 10:43

      Lie down under their ethnic cleansing, stay in their tent in the dessert stripped of all their possessions and say "this is fine".

  • 6. 12 46
    Iran and Auschwitz
    • Karl Eichler Kleinwarden
    • 13.08.10
    • 06:31

    Mr Pfeffer gets it all wrong. My entire family was massacred in Auschwitz. The Shoah could take place, because there was an ideology (as outlined by Mein Kampf) and there was available technology to carry it out. Clearly, the ideology is there in Teheran. Now they are just trying to get the technology. For us Jews, Mr. Pfeffer (and that includes you too) this is an existential threat- nothing less. There are no second chances!

    • 4 1
      my deeply worry for ur family
      • axel s. - germany
      • 13.08.10
      • 09:47

      but u r wrong. and i see it very dangerous that ur fear could lead to a war. ahmeds propaganda should not compared to hitler but to cold war: both side threatening each other. who fires first - dies 2nd. ahmed is how long at power ? 4 - 5 - 6 years ?

    • 1 0
      my deeply worry for ur family 2
      • axel s. - germany
      • 13.08.10
      • 09:53

      when hitler came to power in `33 he had a straight plan how to enforce military. how to overcome to all aspects of civil life. he did more (evil) till `36 than ahmed would his whole life. every year we got a small hitler. sometimes gaddafi. or saddam. maybe mugabes ...

    • 20 7
      Just because Iran has the technology doesn't mean it has the will
      • Miggy
      • 13.08.10
      • 10:46

      Has it ever occurred to you that they might see the need for self defence and deterrent? How many people are going to suffer and die in the Middle East becasue Israel is determined to build up every cross word into an "existential" threat?

    • 8 1
      Ft
      • "there was an ideology (as outlined by Mein Kampf)"
      • 13.08.10
      • 10:47

      This is PURE NONSENSE! Yes, there was an ideology, BUT it was the STATE who did commit it. This is something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!!! Anti-semitism per se is no bigger problem than the popular anti-ismalisms. And Achmediejah is no anti-semite anyway. He is playing with fear and it works.

    • 1 2
      Miggy's 'CROSS WORDS"
      • ernie
      • 13.08.10
      • 19:00

      THANKS FOR PROVIDING MY FIRST LAUGH OF THE DAY! THE GUY IN IRAN IS USING MUCH MORE THAN "CROSS WORDS." tHERE WAS A CHIDHOOD AXIOM IN THE USA: :STICKS AND STONES MAY HURT MY BONES, BUT WORDS WILL NEVER HURT ME. ABSOLUTE NONSENSE. WAKE UP!

    • 0 0
      Karlichler Kleinwarden...If you think Pfeffer wold give uou the satisfaction you?
      • James Israel
      • 14.08.10
      • 16:09

      Deservedly require then you are barking up a wrong tree. His job's requirment does not allow him to agree with yuo as you have read his arrtile. A reminder:I know that there is not one Jewish family anywhere where ever they live who has not LOST A MEMBER OF HIS/HER family in the SHOA. Not a one..Wonder if Mr.Pfeffer has?

  • 5. 43 4
    Agreed!
    • American Jew
    • 13.08.10
    • 05:30

    I think your article is very relevant in today's world. As a Jew in the U.S. I get very frustrated when I see Israel use the memory of the Holocaust as a political tool to acheive some end goal. Even though Israel is home of the Jewish people does not mean the state holds a monopoly on the Shoah and the results of it. Netenyahu or any Israeli politician does not have a hold on the memory of this massive genocide any more than I do, and is no more allowed to capitalize on it anymore than I am.

  • 4. 72 22
    When stuck with a lemon, you make lemonade. When stuck with a holocaust, you profit from it all you can.
    • Natallie Durson
    • 13.08.10
    • 05:28

    As Anshel Pfeffer describes, the holocaust is often invoked by Jews as an excuse for them to do something that they want to do but don't have a good excuse to do otherwise. It is like a default excuse for any Jew to take any action not covered by a better excuse. Everybody knows this, especially the readers of Haaretz. Anshel Pfeffer is preaching to the choir

  • 3. 52 3
    Does this mean? how can it be?
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 13.08.10
    • 04:53

    Could this mean that it isn't proper to use the Nazis to justify the same kind of nationalism and racism the Nazi's practiced? Clearly there is nothing that justifies Israel's policies towards Palestinians more than the policies of Nazis towards Jews. Everyone understands the position and actions of the Nazis. Is it not the best practice to pick a conspicuous minority and target them as the entire threat to the nation? Is it not proper to target a minority so that their assets may be transfered to the majority? The Nazis were monsters, vicious anti-Semites, persons who viewed their 'race' as being superior and deserving of the right to 'living room' which they needed to the east. How can this be confused with God's Chosen Race, which is thus superior and deserving of the right to take the lands God gave them from the inferior people living to the east? Clearly we all understand that the dreams of racial superiority, justified by the need to preserve that race, are something that only Germans could engage in. Americans could never wage race war in the Philippines against the Gooks, so that Americans could have a fashionable empire in 1900. Nor could the British bomb children in Iraqi villages with White Phosphorous bombs in 1920 to put those WOGs in their place. Vicious and brutal racial arrogance only occurs to Germans, right? It could never intrude upon morally superior nations like the United States, Great Britain, or Israel. Could it?

  • 2. 31 10
    One Holocaust is enough
    • MIKE
    • 13.08.10
    • 04:30

    Given what happened in the past I would do everything that I needed to do to prevent a second Holocaust. In this regard, I feel sorry for Israel's leaders because of their awesome responsibility. On the other hand, they could be handling things with respect to fairness to disinherited Palestinians and Syrians (http://www.haaretz.com/magazine/friday-supplement/the-disinherited-1.304959) who lost property.

  • 1. 52 10
    Much more than that: it will create another Holocaust
    • Shelley
    • 13.08.10
    • 04:15

    Surely he cannot have missed the obvious. More than the minds of the victim-obsessed is at risk. The retaliation for any bombing of Iran will wipe out Israeli cities. Has everyone in Israel lost their sense of proportion. Recent articles have pointed out that the net effect of Israel having a ( barely ) concealed nuclear weapon is to guarantee that other countries will want one. Having goaded the enemy, the paranoia has provided its object with a perceived cause. So then you bomb them, not ever being able to use the useless nuclear deterrent, and get blown off the map for your hubris.