Ancient site near Nablus 'too problematic' to open
Mount Gerizim is sacred to the Samaritans who regard it, rather than Jerusalem's Temple Mount, as the location chosen by God for a holy temple.
By Chaim Levinson Tags: Israel newsBehind the rusty iron fence surrounding the archaeological work on Mount Gerizim lies one of Israel's most impressive antiquities sites. But the Civil Administration is keeping the compound closed despite its huge tourism potential. It says planning at the site near Nablus in the West Bank is "too problematic."
Over more than two decades, Yitzhak Magen, the administration's chief archaeology officer, dug up a 2,000-year-old city, once home to 10,000 people.
|
Women of the ancient Samaritan community gather at a pilgrimage on the top of Mount Gerizim, early Wednesday, May 5, 2010. |
| Photo by: AP |
It was preserved in its entirety. The site consists of streets lined with houses, a marketplace and town center. Thousands of bones of sacrificial animals and tens of thousands of coins tell its story.
Mount Gerizim is sacred to the Samaritans who regard it, rather than Jerusalem's Temple Mount, as the location chosen by God for a holy temple.
The mountain remains the center of the Samaritan religion to this day. In 1982, the Civil Administration started digging at the site and continued for 22 years, at an investment of tens of millions of shekels.
"Josephus writes that the Samaritans fell out with the Jews, moved their spiritual center to Mount Gerizim and built their temple in a compound identical to the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. That's what all the archaeologists were looking for," says Benny Katzover, former head of the Samaria Regional Council.
"They discovered that the destroyed temple began in the Hasmonean era and ended in the Byzantine era. The Byzantines built on its ruins an octagonal church, which has been dug up. The compound wall has remained almost entirely intact, as have parts of the central Samaritan city. The findings show a high living standard, with bathtubs, ceramics, a heating system and mosaics. You can see it was the capital of a kingdom."
Initially the authorities set up an observation point overlooking Nablus and signs explaining the findings; they intended to open the site to the public. But after the second intifada they scrapped the plan. Now, during the lull in hostilities, the Samaria Regional Council and Samaritan community are demanding that it be opened to visitors.
'This earth belongs to the community'
"Everyone wants to visit me and see what I believe in, what my history is - but I can't let people in without a permit," says Ovadia Cohen, secretary of the Samaritan community. "This earth belongs to the community, which received it from King Hussein. Every time I want to bring people in I need permits. We're always begging the authorities to open it up. They keep making promises and and breaking them.
"We're ready to run the place, we have the ability to run it. We're losing a lot of money over this every year. Two or three tourist buses could be brought here every day. Multiply that by NIS 15 entrance fees, plus other expenses," he says.
In May the Civil Administration held a meeting about the site and decided it was not interested in developing or running the compound. "Planning here is too problematic," deputy Civil Administration head Ahvat Ben-Hur said at the meeting. "Some of the lands are private and some are owned by the Waqf [Muslim religious trust]. The existing master plan doesn't allow for the construction of new access roads, parking spaces, as well as public and service structures."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
I was unaware of their existence. Interesting.
The site should be opened to the world respectively and with clear planning like other archeological sites throughout the world It is not right to deprive people of an archeological fact and history. .
Nablus is not is Israel. It is in Palestine's West Bank. I don't care how much money has been spent. It is not Israeli land.
'one of Israel's most impressive antiquities sites' 'Israel's'? Really? Since when has Nablus or the West Bank for that matter been 'Israel'? Schoolboy error Mr Levinson, and it stinks of the kind of imperialism the world has come to despise.
Yet the leftist court will not act.
This antiquity is on Palestinian land. If anyone is going to make money from it, it should be the Palestinians. It is particularly ironic given how discriminatorily Israel treats the Samaritans.
How about opening the site up for buses alone. Allot 5 bus permits a day. Have local guides on hand so that the artifacts of the site are protected and people get an updated account of what has been dug up. With only giving bus permits, there is not need to up grade parking or the road - which can be reconsidered down the line. Do Something now!
Planning here is too problematic," deputy Civil Administration head Ahvat Ben-Hur said at the meeting. "The existing master plan doesn't allow for the construction of new access roads, parking spaces, as well as public and service structures." Amazing how this sort of infrastructure happens miraculously quickly when there's settlers involved! Of course the Jewish religious authorities and Zionists don't want competing claims from a rival religion that does not think Jerusalem is the centre of the planet. This is just Jewish cultural hegemony of the worst kind. Israel can open up two Jewish religious sites in Palestine, despite all the bother it caused, but can't see its way to opening an historical gem like Mt Gerizim? This is cultural imperialism and state misuse of its powers, for naked ethnic-religious reasons.
Read the article for the reasons why its problematic instead of making up reasons that line up with your interests.
And if they did, you would slam them for illegal building in "occupied' territories.
is a walk in the park , right! ...blatant discrimination.
The certain Palestinian Muslims recently destroyed the Tomb of Joseph. Joseph is especially an ancestor of the Samaritans! The Israeli government is honest about it being 'too problematic' to build up the most important Samaritan holy site of all, Mount Gerizim. Nevertheless, Israel does safeguard the ancestral burial site in Hebron, which is sacred to all Israelites, both Jewish and Samaritan. It is in everyones interest to build up the Samaritan aboriginal holy sites. It is in Israels own interest to defend it from the ignorant fanatics of any ideological persuasion, political or religious.
...the Moslem och Christian Pals of Nablus-region. More than 90 % of them descend directly from the ancient Hebrew / Israelite population of antique Samaritans that gradually converted to mentioned religions. Something to think about when discussing the concept "Samaria" !?
Most native Christians in Israel descend from Aramaic-speaking Beduin (Nabataeans) who mass converted around the 4th century. The numbers of Jews and Samaritans that converted to Pauline Christianity (that is, the Helenistic 'multinational' non-tribal) form of Christianity, is extremely small.
Don't think so.
There is an entire Palestinian Samaritan community. They don't necessarily want to be Israeli. Their rights and aspirations should be respected, not subject to the Israeli government in Jerusalem.
half of their community lives in Israel and consider themselves Israelis.
Mark, The Samaritans are voting with their feet (as the Christian Arabs quietly do as well). More than half already live in the Tel Aviv region. Why would so many live in Tel Aviv if their holy place is near Nablus?
Samaritans were a people developed during the time the Jews returned from Babylon these are mixed Jewish/Israeli people and before the term Palestinians existed. This is a History and archeological issue not a political issue. The site should be opened for education. Even education of the "Palestinian Samaritans"
Samaritans and Mount Gerazim, Jeroboam restoring idolatry and the worship of Baal, what a history to cling to! The only thing we learn about history is that people learn nothing about history. G-d has already expressed his opinion on the matter.