• Published 00:53 01.09.10
  • Latest update 00:53 01.09.10

Zvi Bar'el / Iran's women defeat Ahmadinejad's 'legal prostitution' bill

Despite its views on Israel and Iran, Turkey is trying to prove it's still a friend to the U.S.

By Zvi Bar'el

The White House was quick to deny a Financial Times report two weeks ago that U.S. President Barack Obama has conditioned an arms sale to Turkey on Ankara's adopting a more sympathetic approach to Israel, but the Turkish-American arms deal is still being delayed.

Women in Tehran Reuters 13.8.2010

Women in Tehran.

Photo by: Reuters

It is not that Obama objects to the deal, but rather Congress that doubts whether Turkey is still a friend of America.

Last week, Turkey's deputy foreign minister and former ambassador to Israel, Feridun Sinirlioglu, met with U.S. State Department officials who are responsible for arms sales, and with members of Congress. He also met with Jewish lobbyists, whom Turkey considers essential to furthering the deal.

The delay of the arms deal is having an effect on the Turkish army's efforts against Kurdish separatists in southeast Turkey and northern Iraq. It would like to acquire Super-Cobra helicopters and attack drones of the type used by the American army in Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as unmanned aerial vehicles from Israel.

The congressmen peppered Sinirlioglu with questions about why his country had refrained from voting in favor of sanctions against Iran and about the Turkish flotilla to Gaza.

Turkey is taking pains to make it clear that it is applying the sanctions against Tehran adopted by the United Nations even though it voted against them but that it is not prepared to adopt the further sanctions imposed by the American administration and the European Union. The result is that the $10 billion of trade between Turkey and Iran has barely been affected and Ankara is continuing to sell gasoline to Tehran.

A United States Treasury delegation that visited Turkey last week with the intention of demanding an end to trade with Iran, was unsuccessful.

Sinirlioglu explained to the Jewish lobbyists that Turkey is interested in normalizing its ties with Israel, which it considers a friend, but that a date had not yet been set for the dispatch of a new Turkish ambassador to Israel after envoy Ahmet Oguz Celikkol was recalled in the wake of the flotilla affair.

Turkey is awaiting an Israeli apology for the incident and compensation for the deaths of nine of its citizens on board the Mavi Marmara. According to Turkish sources, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan won't budge from these two demands even at the price of having the American arms deal delayed, and is awaiting the outcome of the deliberations of the Turkel committee and the international committee that are discussing the flotilla affair.

"It must be understood that internally, Erdogan is about to face one of his most important tests - the referendum on the reform that he has initiated [that will take place on September 12] and he cannot be seen in public as someone who gives in to Israel on so emotional an issue to the Turkish public," said a member of Erdogan's Justice and Development Party.

Meanwhile Turkish representatives in Washington are being given a cold shoulder by U.S. lawmakers and their aides, who put off meetings, and congressional members of the Turkish friendship group are planning to leave it under pressure.

A minor victory for Iran's women

"A marriage of convenience,"a marriage for pleasure," "legal prostitution" - these are just some of the phrases used to describe Shi'ite marriage arrangements that allow a man to marry a woman for a limited amount of time, ranging from one hour to 99 years.

The arrangement is legally recognized in Iran and was even significantly promoted as "a means to help women who have difficulty getting married for various reasons," as the former president, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, explained. The various reasons can include the fact that a woman is divorced, that she is unable to give birth, or that she has committed some transgression that makes it difficult for her to find a husband.

For some of the women who are forced to get married under an arrangement of this kind, as well as for young couples that are not officially married but require legal coverage to spend time together, this is the only arrangement that exists.

It is also convenient for thousands of students who go to the holy cities of Iran and want to have "legal" sex during their studies and before getting "actually" married.

However, these temporary marriages have become a bone of contention in Iran. A draft law introduced by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2007 to regulate the temporary marriages met with a great deal of public criticism, particularly from women's groups. They were especially incensed by the clauses that were intended to help men and make it possible for them to marry another woman without the permission of their first wife, the tax that would be imposed on the dowry the woman would receive, and the registration of temporary marriages.

When the law was introduced in parliament in 2008, it was rejected by the parliamentarians, essentially ending the controversy, until now.

Last week Ahmadinejad once again revived the law and brought it before parliament. His assumption was that since many of its opponents were no longer active - some were in jail and others had left the country - and since the parliament was controlled by a conservative majority, he would not have difficulty in getting it passed.

It appears that he did not estimate the strength of the opposition to the law, not only among women's organizations and human rights groups but also within the parliament. At the end of last week, the parliament decided to reject at least paragraph 21 of the law, which talks of registering temporary marriages and had drawn most of the fire from the women's groups. Additional clauses in the draft law will soon be voted on, but the resounding defeat Ahmadinejad suffered so far in the parliament may yet cause him to withdraw the proposed legislation once again.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 10. 2 4
    Turkey - friend or foe?
    • anonymous
    • 01.09.10
    • 15:47

    It has more to do with Iraq and Iran, I think, than with Israel and Armenia. Turkey's new intelligence chief is a threat; I read there were many friendly Iranian agents in the Turkish army; now one shows up the head of Turkey's intelligence. As a member of NATO, Turkey has a lot of our secrets. Iran is infiltrating every country, including Lebanon, Syria, Turkey. Obama and Biden may be just as condescending and patronizing as Bush, that is true;so will the next President be (could have helped the poor people more). According to "60 minutes", China has also stolen a lot of our secrets. I am certainly concerned that we trust these so-called friends and they stab us in the back. As far as Incirlik, we can find another base I am sure; however, I am not so sure Turkey did not cost us in some way, with the games they were playing with Incirlik. Certainly they have no love for us. They are more worried about the Kurdish situation.

  • 9. 5 6
    Turkey Iran and Israel
    • mehmet
    • 01.09.10
    • 15:29

    Turkey will never be very friendly or very unfriendly with Iran, this is the way the two countries have always been to each other for more than 600 years and it is not likely to change. Erdogan's islamists are pro-arab and pro-saudi not pro-iranian. So as far as Iran is concerned I do not think US is really worried in Turkey's actions. Israel is another issue, relations with Israel are bound to remain bad as long as Israel does not explicity apologize for killing 9 TC citizens. People like me who hate the islamists also think Israel must apologize. Turks are stubborn people and will never bow until an apology comes, they can wait for centuries if necessary, look at the history.

    • 10 6
      Not quite , Mr. Mehmet.
      • John Ehud Ibrahim
      • 01.09.10
      • 16:36

      Mr. Mehmet, it is good to be strong and stubborn like a Turk, but suposing, just suposing the strong and stubborn Turk was wrong on the flotilla fiasco, who should apologise then ? Looking at all the videos and news freely.........., the conclusion is that the big Turkish boat was full of fanatics looking for trouble.

    • 2 10
      that is why we call you turks in iran means...
      • rUBEN
      • 01.09.10
      • 19:45

      foolish. in iran if they want to say to some one crazy, they say are you turk ?.turks have no right to mingel with foolish terorists. israel has been good to you why to destroy something good. if you are realy worried go explain the murder of 1.5 milion armenians. GOOD LUCK.

  • 8. 12 0
    Israel and Kurds
    • Deniz
    • 01.09.10
    • 15:27

    I find it interesting that, after the flotilla incident Israelis became supporters of Kurdish rights. Of course it's not a sincere support, it's just "enemy of my enemy is my friend" logic. But I want you to know that there are 15 million Kurds in Turkey and rebels are only a few thousand. You can be friends with that few thousand, but other millions don't feel the same about Israel.

  • 7. 12 0
    stupid
    • Elias
    • 01.09.10
    • 14:28

    trouble is you didn't understood yet that Turkey ,Kurds and Iran might hate each other so much but still they hate Israel and Jews even more but this time all together. Just see the reactions in the streets .

  • 6. 34 21
    Is Haaretz promoting hatred
    • Concerned citizens
    • 01.09.10
    • 07:25

    Why is Haaretz consistently publishing the Natallie Durson hateful Israel bashing comments. Nothing positive from this woman. Is this right? I note a sense of bias here. Who is this woman?

  • 5. 17 14
    Turkey...
    • J
    • 01.09.10
    • 06:33

    Stop denying the massacre of Kurds. You are a terrorist nation. Edrogan cannot be trusted.

  • 4. 27 11
    America once more strong arms another nation
    • The Prophet
    • 01.09.10
    • 06:26

    Didn't American elite learn a lesson. They played the same game with Iran, look where Iran is. Donot ever be suprised if Turkey becomes next Iran. People are tired of getting humiliated by a bunch of idiots who never ever learn from past, from experience and history.

  • 3. 21 55
    Turkeys actions cost the lives of thousands of US soldiers in Iraq.
    • anonymous
    • 01.09.10
    • 06:17

    when they did not let soldiers and supplies go through Turkey. Add to that Mavi Mamara, no sanctions against Iran and an intelligence officer friendly to Iran, who could give away our military secrets. These are not friendly actions. I am waiting for Iranian women to get full equality; I guess that will be when nationalism dies and international cooperation grows. Sour relations have nothing to do with Israel or Armenia.

    • 12 3
      Not One GI Died
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 01.09.10
      • 08:35

      Not even one single US GI died because the invasion went through Kuwait only and not also through Turkey.

    • 1 5
      Wrong - Turkey's policy enabled the Insurgency
      • Reid
      • 01.09.10
      • 20:06

      The oringinal strategy was a 2 pronged attack from North & South. The northern front would invade the Sunni heartland, round up the Sunni Fedayeen guerillas and surround Baghdad. Instead, the initial invasion was from the South. By the time the US took Baghdad, the Fedayeen disappeared with thousands of tons of Baathist munitions. 4,000 Americans were killed in the Sunni insurgency. The US military considered Turkish our best friend until this. Add to that, Turkish incursion into Iraq during the height of the war, alienating our allies in Iraq and Turkey lost a good friend in the US military. Now, arms sales in Turkey are at the mercy of the Greek and Armenian lobbies. You may think Turkey doesn't need the EU or the US. However, the Turkish military is well aware how quickly the balance of power in the Aegean can shift and the diplomatic balance of power can shift against the occupation of Northern Cyprus.

  • 2. 48 4
    It is immoral to help Turks to supress Kurds who lived
    • 17
    • 01.09.10
    • 05:36

    in their areas long long - about 2 000 years - before Turks. Edrogan should stop the oppression of indigenous population.

  • 1. 25 50
    Turkey need not worry. I am sure that they don't want to break American hearts by closing the American air base in Incirlik.
    • Natallie Durson
    • 01.09.10
    • 05:12

    America needs to pick their friends and enemies without regard to making Israel happy. The consequences are too serious to left to those who are more interested in Israel than they are America.

    • 24 15
      It's probably due to Turkey's latest Islamic extremist their government adopted along with the
      • Avi
      • 01.09.10
      • 05:51

      crimes against humanity they commited against the kurds with chemical weapons, as well as their continued cover of the Armenian genocide.

    • 30 14
      Are you for real - Turkey's actions cost the lives of thousands of american soldiers
      • anonymous
      • 01.09.10
      • 06:11

      No wonder Congress is upset with them, I think. It has to do with not helping us in Iraq; nothing to do with Israel or Armenia. Add to that helping Iran, having an intelligence officer with links to Iran, who could easily give them our secretst. The list goes on.

    • 22 35
      Israel is 'inconsequential' in the big picture comapred to Turkey!
      • Levo
      • 01.09.10
      • 06:36

      Turkey, the World's 16th largest economy by GDP, Turkey the second fastest developing economy on the planet, Turkey with the 6th biggest armed forces in the World, the moderately islamic Turkey bridging the East and the West ... etc etc What does tiny troublemaker Israel have to offer to the US other than emabarrasement and 'guilt by association'?

    • 7 1
      give me a single proof where chemical weapons were used?
      • Dave
      • 01.09.10
      • 11:49

      You know it better than any nations do.

    • 4 6
      inconsequential
      • RationalRose
      • 01.09.10
      • 12:36

      What does Israel Have to offer that Turkey cant? Hmm - tough one. 1. Technology? I wont bore with comparitive statistics between Turkey and Israel 2. Near 100% Loyalty? 3. Stability? - Not at risk of falling off the deep end with enemies of democracy. Try to give it some unbiased thought or crawl back into your cave

    • 4 6
      Levo
      • Sam
      • 01.09.10
      • 16:02

      When I visit European countries or Israel, I feel like I am still in the 21st century. When I visited Turkey I felt like a time traveler. Your society still lives in the 12th century. Most Americans support Israel because we share common values. And Turkey shares common values with Iran. That's why Turkey supports Iran.

    • 6 6
      the difference, Levo ?
      • John Ehud Ibrahim
      • 01.09.10
      • 16:06

      In case you didn't know , Levo, one the differences between Turkey and Israel is their reliability. Turkey has switched from being as you say the bridge East/West to being another Islamist country : worse than Arab states, it has openly sided with Iran's barbaric regime. Whereas Israel is the US best and most reliable friend in the world. Can you see better now ?

    • 1 11
      What you forgot to mention Levo was that
      • Avi
      • 01.09.10
      • 17:48

      Israel is the west's front in the middle east, it helped tip the balance of the cold war by being the first western nation to obtain a soviet Mig and by winning the middle east frontier, not to mention that this tiny nation has 2.5 times the GDP per citizen Turkey has, with a total of a third of the GDP the government has, and it's the FASTEST growing western economy with the least chances to get effected by outside economic crisis. And let's not forget the scientific research and high tech inventions it shares with the world (such as bacterial and heart disease cures and the modern cellphone and the personal computer in each home). :-) Stings, doesn't it?