• Published 00:55 13.07.10
  • Latest update 00:55 13.07.10

Reform rabbi: Israel's pluralism threatened by new conversion law

World Reform Movement is busy opposing Yisrael Beiteinu's controversial conversion bill, currently frozen by the PM after being approved by the Knesset.

By Yair Ettinger

Reform Rabbi Galia Sadan plays several roles in the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: She is rabbi of the Beit Daniel synagogue in Tel Aviv, coordinator of the Council of Progressive Rabbis and director of a conversion school at the Beit Daniel Center. The school, she says, converts about 200 people annually. Sadan, like many Reform and Conservative rabbis, is a native Israeli, despite both denominations' image as comprised primarily of immigrants from the United States and Europe.

Rabbi Galia Sadan

Rabbi Galia Sadan.

Photo by: Moti Milrod

On July 17, the World Reform Movement will commemorate the establishment of the first Reform temple 200 years ago, in Germany. But closer to home, it is busy opposing Yisrael Beiteinu's controversial conversion bill, which was frozen by the prime minister immediately its approval by the Knesset Constitution Committee yesterday.

So what happened 200 years ago?

"On July 17 two hundred years ago, the first temple was dedicated in the city of Seesen. The person behind it was Rabbi Israel Jacobson, who was very active, first in Seesen and then in Berlin. In addition to the changes he introduced in the religious ritual, such as giving sermons in German and using an organ and choir in the services, this was the first attempt to establish interfaith relations. Christians were present at the dedication, as a group ... In his opening speech, [Jacobson] spoke of both Jews and Christians. There was no attempt to violate tradition, but rather to make cosmetic changes to bring Jews closer to the world of tradition."

What did prayer in this synagogue look like?

"At first, the service preserved all the traditional elements, such as the Shema, the Amida and the Torah reading. It wasn't yet a feminist service, and men and women were separated. Rabbi Jacobson decided the service had to be more aesthetic, so he brought in an organ and choir and delivered the sermon in German, so people would understand. The people prayed from a prayer book with a German translation and read from Mendelssohn's translation of the Bible. The prayer emphasized universal issues, and they removed particularist elements such as the dream of rebuilding the Temple in the Land of Israel.

"Reform prayer has undergone many upheavals in the past 200 years. There was a time when people did not come to synagogue with skullcaps and prayer shawls, and today people want that. On the other hand, the service has become 100 percent egalitarian, the movement recognizes the rights of gays and lesbians and it is willing to marry a cohen and a convert, which is forbidden according to halakha [religious law]. We don't consider ourselves bound by halakha; we let everyone choose for himself what to take from Judaism's large basket.

"Another thing [Jacobson] instituted, and which the Reform Movement practiced until the Holocaust, was having the Jews pledge allegiance to their homeland. Reform at its inception considered itself loyal to the homeland and said it's impossible to ask for equal rights in Germany, for example, while saying that our hearts are in the Holy Land, because if we continue that way, the Jews' loyalty will always be suspect. They wanted to strengthen the universal aspects of Judaism. The Reform Movement stuck to not dreaming of Zion until the 1930s, when it became a fully Zionist movement. The movement understood that the desire to be integrated had become a house of cards that collapsed, and Reform Judaism made a 180-degree turn after the Holocaust. Today, the Reform and Conservative movements comprise 70 percent of the world's Jews and are Israel's greatest supporters."

So the idea of becoming integrated, and in Germany of all places, turned the temple's establishment into a horrific irony.

"Absolutely. The Reform Movement recognized this irony and publicly declared: We were mistaken ... We believed they would accept us there, and the bitter truth slapped us in the face."

Let's talk about the present: What disturbs you about Yisrael Beiteinu's conversion bill?

"What has disturbed the Reform Movement from its inception is the question of the Jewish people's spiritual survival - how this people can continue to exist despite the dizzying changes of the modern world. That's the question that disturbs today as well: Are we bringing people closer to us, whether as spouses or on their own, in a pleasant, accepting process that understands the tension between a person's desire to adopt Jewish tradition and his desire to maintain a modern lifestyle, or are we interested in a humiliating process that causes people to fail? ... Orthodox conversion is very difficult to complete. It's an educational process that expects people to become religiously observant, and what can you do if not everyone wants to become religiously observant? People pretend so they'll get the seal of approval.

"Our country was revealed in all its glory in 2002 when it declared that it is pluralistic, and that a person can be recognized as a convert in any denomination he chooses. The High Court of Justice ruled that the government must recognize all conversions for all intents and purposes ... And now this bill comes and takes us backward. We're giving up pluralism, recognizing only the rabbinate and ruling that only conversions done through the rabbinate will be recognized. That's the situation that exists with regard to marriage. Since 1964, the rabbinate has been the only institution that can approve marriage between Jews in Israel. And today we're eating the rotten fruits of that law. People don't want to marry through the rabbinate."

But in practice, what will change? After all, you can continue to perform conversions that will be recognized by the state. The bill says the rabbinate will have authority, but not exclusive authority. Aren't you terrorizing the public when you threaten a rift between U.S. Jewry and Israel?

"Giving authority to the Chief Rabbinate means that if you don't observe the Sabbath, they won't convert you. If you seek to convert because you want to live according to Jewish tradition but don't want to observe Shabbat - to live a Jewish but not an Orthodox life - you won't be able to convert through them. We are all eating the rotten fruits of the marriage law that gave the rabbinate a monopoly. This is an undemocratic country where there are people who can't get married. Do we want to behave the same way on conversion? If it says the rabbinate has "authority," then the ultra-Orthodox will interpret that as exclusive authority, and we will have to run to the courts. The practical significance is that we will have to fight about the status quo again. Why should the State of Israel go backward? The existing situation is that there is no law determining who is allowed or is not allowed to perform conversions, and only thanks to that is the State of Israel preserving its pluralistic and liberal character and enabling everyone to choose the lifestyle he wants. The moment there is a conversion law that gives the rabbinate the authority, the State of Israel will lose this pluralistic character."

Tell us a bit about the conversion process in your rabbinical courts.

"We have about 200 converts a year. Incidentally, all the Orthodox institutions together, which receive huge government budgets, convert 2,000 people a year. We, without any government funding, convert 200. The High Court ruled that the state has to fund our conversion courses, so what? Does that mean we received money? No. We have a conversion court of rabbis from the movement. It's a democratic body that convenes about 14 times a year to conduct conversions. We have been operating since 2002, thanks to the High Court decision that recognized conversions by any denomination, and every year the number of those who convert with us increases.

"Refugees from Orthodox conversion have come to us after being rejected because the woman was caught walking in the street wearing pants. I could tell you horror stories about the conversion system, but the main thing is that more and more people understand that Reform Judaism is an option. The congregations are totally Israeli. There's an ingathering of exiles from all over the world, as well as representation of every ethnic group. The Reform Movement is not Ashkenazi; it includes an amazing human variety of people who come and say: I want to choose my own components from the basket of Judaism."

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 44. 2 4
    What a joke!
    • Steve
    • 15.07.10
    • 18:50

    This 'rabbi' says you can pick and choose from the basket of Judaism. Yeah, that sums up the emptiness of the Reform movement. As for her 200 converts, if I allowed picking and choosing and her level of learning, I could convert 2,000 people in a day.

  • 43. 4 1
    Reform rabbi...
    • sandra chitayat
    • 15.07.10
    • 02:37

    Excellent article. It's about right. Perhaps only 30%of Jews worlwide are Orthodox. Even Jews by birth decide eventually to be Baaim Teshuvah. This is a gateway, an opening, whereby if they want to pursue further, they can choose to go that route. Anyway, hooray for the Reformist Movement which allows women to be rabbis, even though it is said that we ARE a kingdom of priests and a Holy nation, and all were pressent at the Revelation on Mount Sinai, both men AND women. The history of the reform movement and its luminaries IS very interesting, and unfortunate in that we sometimes don't see Amalek, when he is right in front of us. "...in every generation".

  • 42. 6 2
    Who is a Jew nd what is being Jewish?
    • Tom Jode
    • 14.07.10
    • 16:36

    So, conversion is based on these punctilious halachic guidelines and strict observance of the Orthodox rules, or it is not a genuine Jewish conversion and you are not a real Jew. However, if you have your Jewish mother's mitochondrial DNA, but never enter a synagogue, don't eat kosher, don't know how to daven, and don't have any interest in Jewish culture you are Jewish. On the other hand, if you are a sincere patrilineal, or reform / conserv. convert who attends synagogue, knows how to daven in Hebrew, and is a member of a Jewish community you are not Jewish. This is so screwed up as to be unbelievable.

  • 41. 0 3
  • 40. 17 6
    Bronzeage
    • Miracles left and right
    • 14.07.10
    • 12:09

    Hi, in case you didn't know, in the eyes of most of the developed world the intrajewish quarrels about the understanding and interpretation of their particular bronze age mytholgy seem absolutely ridiculous. Have a nice day

  • 39. 26 5
    Reform Conversion
    • Rita
    • 14.07.10
    • 10:06

    Can any of you holy people explain how on of our founding mothers, Rachel, was converted? I don't believe she went through any lengthy obtuse conversion process? The story goes that she just declared to Naomi, that your people are my people, walla, became a Jew and first matriarch of the King David Lineage.

  • 38. 17 7
    its so unfair like all religion
    • ky
    • 14.07.10
    • 03:53

    I am an athiest,, no good second rate gsmut Jew I dont give tuppence for the torah, shabat, reform , consensevative or haredi. they make me sick up to my neck as i believe that all people are equal and must be treated as such and religion simply sets people against one another. However as my folks were jews and so were theirs way back until time began I am considered as a Jew. I am ok with that , but if the orthodox dont think Iam a jew thats just fine too. I think it really unfair for all those poor souls who work so hard at trying to be jewish to be denied that simple human right to be part of the religion of their choice.

  • 37. 14 3
    conversion,israel
    • craig
    • 14.07.10
    • 02:34

    First of aLl I converted to reform judaism 2yr ago this is one of the best things I have ever done. I am very disapointed with many of the events I have been reading about lately First of all no one but adonai can delegitimate my jewishness Some ppeople have made a big fat idol out of the halaka if I had just heaRd about judaism from the haredi I.would think that their god was halakha and hashem was ahelpfull spirit thaT helped one to keep the halakha The halakha was for mostly intefering with our ability to socalise with gentiles keeping us safe from assimiliating this certianly works today with The haridim The haridim keep the halakha and some of them Are mean as hell As far As israel goes it saddens me to say that it is a land of hatred ,many layers of hatred the only reason I would want to go there is if I were fleeing for my life

  • 36. 4 16
    The Real Issue with Conversion
    • Jake in Jerusalem
    • 14.07.10
    • 00:39

    The real issue here is usually obfuscated, and deliberately so, by Reform rabbis. Leaving conversion INSIDE Israel in the hands of the Israeli Rabbinate and in accordance with Halacha has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on members of Reform Temples in the USA. It DOES, however, reduce the legitimacy of Reform "rabbis" and their power to profit from their social status. Because there are a rather limited number of Reform "rabbis" who cannot fight this alone, they deliberately couch the argument in terms that will offend their membership, hoping that their numbers will weigh in. This is dishonest money-grubbing on the part of Reform rabbis. When members of Reform Temples understand how they have been taken advantage of by their "rabbis", they leave those Reform Temples for something more genuine. Keeping Reform "rabbis" out of the conversion business is thus a direct threat to the profitability of Reform "rabbis" - who will squeal the loudest.

    • 1 0
      Your Message is Pure Hate-Mongering
      • Mark
      • 14.07.10
      • 21:07

      You blithely lambast reform rabbis as an entire group, accusing them across the of being dishonest and "money grubbers." In short, you make ad hominem attacks on the character of individuals you don't even know, based on nothing more than your own ideology of hatred. Boy do I feel sorry for you.

  • 35. 13 0
    just separate the issues, if you indeed do want to be a modern, secular & democratic state -
    • ivo
    • 14.07.10
    • 00:09

    let people discuss forever what exactly it should mean to be a jew, the meaning of halakha etc. but in the modern, secular state that the zionists (in the positive sense) instituted as a homeland for the jewish people you can't have any form of religious coercion, not to speak of coercion by one dominant religious group. that means you can't have discrimination either. at the birth of zionism, & indeed of the state, the jewish 'tree' had already grown into all kinds of directions, incl. a completely secularized one, & the idea of a modern state, based on immigration rights acc. to the law of return, can't just be hijacked by those who believe thay're entitled to exerting relig. influence - BY LEGAL MEANS - over everybody else, even if the intention is to 'preserve' the jews as a people. the idea was to make a state w/clearly hebrew /jewish character, but a modern one w/freedoms for all. that can be done in abundant measure without in any way infringing on basic rights & on equality. leave the actual religious content to God & people's own free will, not STATE PRESSURE. it will most likely turn ot better that way anyway. the state as such shouldn't in any way be involved in halakhic decisions, interpretations etc., although it will of course be supportive of the practice of judaism. it was herzl (& eventually ben gurion) who made this state, not moshe, & if you indeed do want another kind of state, you should expect God to send another one & take it over. that's all there is to this.

  • 34. 3 0
    just separate the issues, if you indeed do want to be a modern, secular & democratic state -
    • ivo
    • 14.07.10
    • 00:08

    let people discuss forever what exactly it should mean to be a jew, the meaning of halakha etc. but in the modern, secular state that the zionists (in the positive sense) instituted as a homeland for the jewish people you can't have any form of religious coercion, not to speak of coercion by one dominant religious group. that means you can't have discrimination either. at the birth of zionism, & indeed of the state, the jewish 'tree' had already grown into all kinds of directions, incl. a completely secularized one, & the idea of a modern state, based on immigration rights acc. to the law of return, can't just be hijacked by those who believe thay're entitled to exerting relig. influence - BY LEGAL MEANS - over everybody else, even if the intention is to 'preserve' the jews as a people. the idea was to make a state w/clearly hebrew /jewish character, but a modern one w/freedoms for all. that can be done in abundant measure without in any way infringing on basic rights & on equality. leave the actual religious content to God & people's own free will, not STATE PRESSURE. it will most likely turn ot better that way anyway. the state as such shouldn't in any way be involved in halakhic decisions, interpretations etc., although it will of course be supportive of the practice of judaism. it was herzl (& eventually ben gurion) who made this state, not moshe, & if you indeed do want another kind of state, you should expect God to send another one & take it over. that's all there is to this.

    • 0 0
      State enforced Judaism
      • robinsonE
      • 14.07.10
      • 21:02

      The Idea of true Demiocracy in Israel is some what of an oxymoron.How can a state be concidered truley Democratic while at the same time showing partiality and favortism based apon racial ethnicity and religious practices.Historically, there were other brances of judaism that died out. Rabbinic judaism will have other ignorant jews believe that this system is the one and only true branch when in fact the Essenes aqnd the Saduceses did not ecept Oral tradition as valid.

  • 33. 10 0
    #26 Grandchildren
    • Yossi
    • 14.07.10
    • 00:02

    A study was made of the dscendants of Chacham Theodore Gaster of London's Spanish and Portugese Synagogue at the turn of the century. It appears that all his great grandchildren are fine upstanding people -- BUT none are Jewish ! And he was a leading Orthodox Rabbi. Same applies to German Orthodox Rabbi Moses Mendelsohn. Assimilation is very attractive even to those who are observant. Karl Marx came from a rabbinical family, and look what he became.

  • 32. 2 2
    #27 On to something
    • BenAzzai
    • 13.07.10
    • 23:56

    My Christian or Gentile friends can also pick and choose from customs in the basket of Judaism, do what they fancy and ignore the rest. You really don't have to be Jewish to be Reform. Some Christian groups have a Passover seder, others have a day similar to Yom Kippur; in the old days many kept Sunday as a Christian Shabbos with almost everything shut, etc. It could be a Reform Club with Jews picking from the Christian basket as well -- special dinner on 25th December, Easter eggs, New Year's Eve parties etc.

  • 31. 2 7
    Most secular Jews dont realize that the most feminist religion is the True Judiasm (not reform, conservative, or Jews for jesus).
    • Aron
    • 13.07.10
    • 22:43

    Most don't know it, but true Judaism is in fact the most feminist religion you can find. For example, by Halachah 1. a husband must buy his wife presents every Jewish holiday. 2. a women has a right to tell her husband I do not want to work, you provide all the food and clothing for me, while I'll sit at home. 3. A husband must pay the Ketubah in case of divorce. Where else do you see so much benefits to the women?

  • 30. 4 8
    Reform Judaism does NOT make sense
    • Pete
    • 13.07.10
    • 21:57

    1."Orthodox conversion is very difficult to complete. It's an educational process that expects people to become religiously observant" How is that any different than expecting new immigrants to follow the laws of a particular country when they apply for citizenship? OF COURSE it's difficult. Jews don't proselytize. How else do you determine someone's sincerity? 2. "People pretend so they'll get the seal of approval" She has a lot pf nerve to make that claim about the Orthodox after her previous comment. First it is an insult to all converts, secondly she represents a movement that is told that they are not required to observe anything. To wit: 3. "the service has become 100 percent egalitarian, the movement recognizes the rights of gays and lesbians and it is willing to marry a Cohen and a convert, which is forbidden according to halakha [religious law]. We don't consider ourselves bound by halakha; we let everyone choose for himself what to take from Judaism's large basket" Than why bother??? What makes it Judaism? The bagels after services??? 4. She explains that Reform services have organs and choirs like the church to "to make cosmetic changes to bring Jews closer to the world of tradition" Does this woman have any pride at all? They may as well call it the "self loathing" movement. The "world of tradition"???? WHOSE tradition? 5. She says that Israel was "revealed in all it's glory" when in 2002 when "The High Court of Justice ruled that the government must recognize all conversions for all intents and purposes" Great. So if a "Humanistic" "Rabbi" sprinkles some water on you after you pay your Temple dues (don't laugh-the Orthodox movement is the ONLY branch of Judaism that has consistent rules for conversion) then that person is Jewish? WHAT? Again-these people do not care about Judaism. They care about the ideology of the left: total obsession with gender,race,class. Values have no place in the equation and neither does normative Judaism. Their willingness to justify, in the most self righteous terms, the rejection of 3,500 years of tradition blows my mind. They are shameless about it. In fact she goes on to say: 6 "Giving authority to the Chief Rabbinate means that if you don't observe the Sabbath, they won't convert you. If you seek to convert because you want to live according to Jewish tradition but don't want to observe Shabbat - to live a Jewish but not an Orthodox life - you won't be able to convert through them." See #1. What is a "Jewish life" if you remove Jewish law? I sit being a good, ethical person? Is the "Rabbi" saying that non Jews aren't also commanded to be good, ethical people (they are)? That isn't a exclusively a "Jewish Value." It is a shame that the lack of observance and religious education in the USA is infecting Israel. Because that is what is happening here. Lastly, I love that the "Rabbi" consistently refers to the Orthodox as "Ultra Orthodox" as every strain of Orthodoxy from Modern Orthodox to the Satmar Rebbe doesn't completely reject the doctrine of the Reform movement.

  • 29. 5 14
    Reform is a diaspra creation-It is irrelevant in Israel
    • Jack
    • 13.07.10
    • 21:27

    It was made so Jews could integrate with the Christians and feel at home. In Israel a Jew can feel at home as a Jew. No need to integrate with the non Jews here so no need for reform here. Thats why it will never take off in Israel. If anything they need to convert the nonJewish Olim just to fill the seats in their congregations in Israel. It is useless for Israeli Jews. It is only useful for a couple of reform psuedorabbis who are trying to make ends meet.

  • 28. 4 3
    Lessons from Vatican II
    • William
    • 13.07.10
    • 21:23

    Following Vatican II, the church dropped Latin and instituted "reforms", church attendance fell through the floor. Same for the COE, and other denominations. Like Reform Judaism, when religious leaders and institutions offer nothing but current politically correct fads, people loose interest. In the US, where Reform is predominate, the intermarriage rate is something like 70+% in many communities. If you don't want your kids to marry other Jews, then adopting Reform Judaism is the way to go. Frankly, I wonder if that is not the real motivation. Reform was started in Germany and flourishes in America. That is not a coincidence.

  • 27. 18 22
    why convert to Reform Judaism- You can be a reform Jew as a gentile
    • Jack
    • 13.07.10
    • 20:40

    They are the virtually the same as gentiles. They eat nonKosher. Don't do shabbat and marry nonJews. They don't have proper Jewish divorce. So why don't they just be reform gentiles. Reform encompasses both Jews and gentiles because it is like a social club. They don't conversion any more just membership fees to be a part of their social club

  • 26. 13 20
    Most reform Jews in USA grandchildren will not be Jews
    • Jack
    • 13.07.10
    • 20:33

    So what do they care about the bill anyway. The children of most reform don't go to synogogue more than a few times a year and don't study Torah much less Halachah. Many don't even keep shabbat. The children marry nonJews at an alarming pace. The rabbis in reform say it is OK to be homosexual. Almost every thing they do is against the Torah. What exactly are they converting people too. A religion that is against Torah study and practice. A religion of convenience and a religion that changes according to each persons physical desires.

  • 25. 18 2
    the core issue
    • Lion
    • 13.07.10
    • 19:32

    The core-issue is not one of Orthodoxy vs. Reform. It is rather the nature of the relationship between representatives of a religious tradition and what is, for all other purposes and appearances, a modern, secular government. There is a clear element of irrationality in an arrangement by which a group of clergy (whoever they may be) and the right of citizenship or even of residence in a nation-state. Such an arrangement rests upon ideological assumptions that Israelis by and large do not accept. It is time for Israel to go beyond that bizarre arrangement and strive to become a nation-state resting upon more rational foundations like other states.

    • 1 6
      the core issue...
      • e l pratt
      • 14.07.10
      • 05:37

      The core issue is that Israel is a nation established by God, not by men. For the citizens of Israel to anything less that orthodox is sin itself. Furthermore, there is no reason whatsoever for a woman to be in the pulpit.

    • 1 4
      clear, but unclear
      • a voice
      • 14.07.10
      • 10:46

      This bizzare arrangement is certainly not good for just any other country which has no foundations of religious significance. Israel is unique among all the nations, obviously with holy turf as well as history. You cannot separate the two. If one is a non-practicing Jew, these issues are irrelevant. If you are a jew of action then you know our existence is based on a contract which has lasted for thousands of years and is equally relevant today. We are doomed if we try to copy-cat the other nations. For your information, if you want to push aside your own particular bias, Israelis, by and large do accept the G-d/ People/Land connection and have a keen respect unfortunately conform jews lost or never had. Many of the secular sephardi Israelis many not observe all mitzvot, but they have diehard commitments to our heritage and will never have anything to do with the conform song and dance shows. they know truth! Step within the lions boundaries and expect to hear irrational loud roars- it insures survival. The same holds true for our historic people. Conform Jews have been declawed, and defanged and will never survive as a Jew in the world's jungle. True Torah education can make you a king of the jungle once more.

  • 24. 11 12
    Phase two of the Holocaust has arrived
    • Dean Blake
    • 13.07.10
    • 18:57

    With the destruction of european Jewry and all its rabbis and schools, we are now confronting the fall-out of the lack of quality rabbis in the USA. The American Jews fell away from halacha under overwhelming pressure from goyem and pursuit of the 'Am dream'. The change in Israeli law is intended as part of eliminating the problem of immigration fraud as much as refining the Law of Return. Its not intended as a personal offense to non-observant Jews who clump and annount themselves with a new name. Remember, the original Conservative movement was just a switch by the chazzan from Tricorn hats to Top hats!! He didn't change what was under the hat!!

  • 23. 8 11
    Apikores' opinion
    • 17
    • 13.07.10
    • 18:01

    All newly invented "Judaism kal/light" branches may be respectable worldviews, theories andapproaches but not the Religion. Nevertheless Haredim should not bother their Jewish brothers not sharing their religious ardor. The Lady, "rabi" should join social-democratic movement and stop pretending...

  • 22. 14 27
    reform
    • dave
    • 13.07.10
    • 16:52

    they're NOT Jewish

  • 21. 13 11
    Real Conversion
    • Gila
    • 13.07.10
    • 16:33

    With respect to Galia Sadan and all those who find an orthodox conversion too difficult, genuine conversion is not about choosing what you want to keep and throwing away what you don't from an inclusive basket of Judaism. It is a solid commitment to observe the Laws of the Torah given by G-d at Sinai. These include keeping Shabbat, Kashrut and Family Purity. If you don't want to keep them, don't convert. Remain a righteous gentile. You can still worship at a synagogue of your choice and keep as much or as little of Judaism as you wish with the exception of a complete observance of Shabbat. True conversion is a soul changing experience of fundamental proportions. At the mikvah, usually reached after much suffering, you really do receive a new higher soul. Part of that process is acceptance by the convert of all the mitzvot and the convert's acceptance by three shomer shabbat Jewish men. There is a very real spirituality involved and a real commitment to Hashem Himself, which is not to be undertaken lightly. It is not about personal feelings, concentrating on what you personally want and choosing what bits of Judaism you want to keep and what you don't. It is all about Hashem and accepting His will. Completely. The real reason to convert, properly and totally, is that you truly find that you simply HAVE to be Jewish, no matter what. The orthodox way may today unfortunately be riddled with politics, unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles and inter-rabbinical arguments, and the process does need to be made more pure, honest and humanly sensitive, but it must always be according to halacha for the true soul change - given by Hashem Himself - to that of a Jew to be made.

    • 0 0
      Real Conversion
      • Uri
      • 15.07.10
      • 01:12

      Very true. Judaism is NOT a pick 'n mix religion. If you want to be a true convert to Judaism then you must accept all 613 commandments and their derivatives. I'm sorry Gila (NOT a rabbi of any sort) but you cannot say that Judaism is about letting people choose what they want from the "large basket'. As for your so-called 'converts', none of them are Jewish according to Halacha and if they were to marry real Jews they would cause severe problems for themselves and for any children they may have.

  • 20. 16 6
    The Orthodox and the Reform
    • johnb
    • 13.07.10
    • 16:30

    "Liberal Judaism" will not ever 'return' to observing halacha, eat kosher etc. etc. They will in orthodox eyes be "illegitimate" But they are a form of Judaism like it or not and should not be demonised for their beliefs. Efforts shold be made by both sides to reach agreement on how to deal with their differences

    • 1 2
      Basic Definition Problems
      • Antigonos
      • 14.07.10
      • 12:24

      You are a Jew because your MOTHER was either born to a halachically correct mother, or converted according to halacha. ALL Reform "Jews", who do not meet this criterion, aren't Jews at all, and unfortunately, since it's more than 40 years since the Reform movement decided that, in a total rejection of halacha, fathers could confer "Jewishness", there are a lot of "Reform Jews" out there who aren't Jewish at all. They are probably nice people, but they are NOT part of Klal Israel and therefore are irrelevant to those who are.

  • 19. 12 3
    By all means, let's defend pluralism
    • David
    • 13.07.10
    • 16:18

    Of course, pluralism also applies to Druze, non-Jewish Russians, Palestinians, Yemenites, Ethiopians, gays, refuseniks, and peaceniks.

  • 18. 20 4
    Creating a Dysfunctional Family
    • Scrolls
    • 13.07.10
    • 16:16

    The Conversion bill splits the family. Most of us in North America are either Reform or Conservative. Most Israelis are either Secular or Orthodox. It's harder for either to identify with the other. The Conversion bill doesn't help heal the divide. One family??????

    • 1 3
      holy roller, there is no new family split!
      • a voice
      • 14.07.10
      • 11:01

      Conforms are dying out by intermarriage and low/no birthrates and only prop up their numbers by bringing in more gentiles who 'convert' 1,2,3! Orthos in the states in 1-2 generations will be the majority as dysfunctional questionably Jewish families will disappear or turn into some other fadish group. In Israel, you have three groups, fyi- religious covering a wide range of people, non-religious (many sephardis) who may not practice but respect halacha and practice basics which conform Jews don't even bother with, and anti-Jewish Jews who fight against anything jewish based on their agenda driven education, lack of a real Jewish education, and self-absorbed materialistic orientation. The later group ironically sides up with the very few conforms in Israel as a way to attack mainstream Judaism in Israel. Their agendas are evil and destructive, born out of their own failures. Like all great systems, professions, and designs, when you lower the standards, you end up with chaos. Judaism began and continues with a high standard and survives not due to 'progressive' do-littlers, but survives through Torah Observance. It is so simple and yet intelligent, data lacking minds just don't get the picture... until it is usually too late.

    • 0 0
      Excellent comment, Scrolls # 18.
      • Fortuna Benmayor
      • 14.07.10
      • 22:02

      Although I am an observant Jew, I care for all my brothers and sisters, for klal Israel, our family. I loved your post, thank you.

  • 17. 24 10
    Disgusted American Jew
    • Reform Jew
    • 13.07.10
    • 15:59

    Only the Orthodox in Israel would cut off their nose to spite their face. At a time when Israel needs all the support it can get, trying to deligitimize 50% of the Jews in the world seems like a pretty stupid idea. This will destroy American Jewry's support for Israel faster than anything. But I suppose Israel doesn't care about that either.

  • 16. 24 6
    Reform Work vs Orthodox Benefit Seekers
    • Dan
    • 13.07.10
    • 15:22

    I'd rather be surrounded by a million reform Jews working and supporting the economy, than a million ultra-orthodox who spend their lives reading Torah. Don't get me wrong, it's a worthy cause - but it doesn't keep the lights on or food in the fridge!

    • 10 2
      For better or worse, . . .
      • Zev Davis
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:36

      First off, there are plenty of Haredim who work, pay taxes, and otherwise earn their own incomes. How do you explain a multi-million shekel advertisisng industry that targets them. If they lived on charity you wouldn't have it. The other thing about Haredim, and other Tradiitional forms of Judaism is that that they believe in the idea that God gave the Land of Israel to the Jewish People because it says so in the Bible. The Reform and Conservative movements grew out of a period when Jews were perusaded that if they took the "super" national aspects out of Judaism, and kept it stricly "national', we would manage fine among the non-Jewish people-- it was Historic. Our Laws were Historic, our very essence was Historic. Jerusalem was Historic, . . . If that's the case you can be an "Historic" Jew in North America without any existential need to live in the Land of Israel. Many Jews in North America feel that way and likely will not go on Aliya. That, my friend, leaves you with the crazy Jews who insist in beleiving that our Forefather Abraham did what God told him to do and went forth to the Land of Canaan because that was where he, and his children were going to live. If you, Mr. Dan, can convince these Historic Jews that the promise that God made to our Forefather Abraham was not just Historic, then maybe they will come. Until then, you will have to stuck with those "superstitious" Haredim, and otherwise Traditional Jews.

    • 0 2
    • 1 4
      Most assimilated Jews agree
      • Chaim Ben Kahan
      • 14.07.10
      • 11:09

      I would ask them, but they no longer identify themselves as Jews! I would rather be surrounded by Torah scholar than greedy people trying only to make a buck. You think Jews got a bad rep for cheating people from studying Torah?

    • 0 0
      Assimilated Jews
      • Sol
      • 14.07.10
      • 18:30

      How about being surrounded by Torah scholars who rip off the Israeli tax paying public...or...lauinder millions (billions?) or engage in narcotics trafficking all for HaShem's sake? What utter nonsense.

  • 15. 24 5
    Observing
    • Jew Not Jew But Jew
    • 13.07.10
    • 14:39

    Outgoing Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gabriela Shalev on Sunday warned that hatred of Israel in the halls of the United Nations is reaching a peak and yet, Israel wants to cut off half of the Jews who would support it. Only in Eretz Yisra'el. Instead of allowing the Ultra-Orthodox to rule, why not have a king? It's obvious you cannot handle democracy.

    • 3 4
      hatred
      • josh
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:45

      pardon me, but israeli policies that have their font in this elitism drive much of that "hatred" (read, "criticism") of israel. It's not irrational hatred or anti-semitism

    • 2 1
      have a king...
      • e l pratt
      • 14.07.10
      • 05:44

      Israel tried that but it didn't work. YHWH is the King of Israel--He just needs reasonable Jews to follow His words and Laws.

  • 14. 7 7
    Pluralism exists in Israel, even . . .
    • Zev Davis
    • 13.07.10
    • 14:19

    the people who don't accept Halacha, who live in teh country, and function within it are part of that plurality. The problem begins when you tamper with the basics of Judaism. You can accept Halacha, or reject it, but it has been the standard for Jewish communal life for a long time. That some Jews don't accept it, and have decided it is not Revealed, but Historical, that it can change "if you will it" doesn't change Halacha. No matter how rational, or up to date, or you want to make Judaism more appealing to the millions, it's based on Sacred Texts, the Written ones and the Oral traditions that have come to be written down. We don't mix meat with milk because there are three citations with three contexts in the Written Law, and not because of historical, or social, or any other reasons you fabricate in order to placate you bias against what you regard as "supernatural", or illogical When the Messiah comes we know what to do.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

  • 13. 15 27
    Deligitimizing an Illegitimate Judaism
    • Antigonos
    • 13.07.10
    • 14:10

    "Rabbi" Sadan isn't a rabbi. She's playing at being one. When "Liberal Judaism" returns to observing halacha, which means returning to the classically acceptable definition of "Who Is A Jew", begins observing the mitzvot such as kashrut and tacharat mishpacha, stops doing spurious conversions, and stops thinking that women can be rabbis, then we can take its views seriously. As of now, in its rejection of halacha, "Liberal Judaism" isn't Judaism at all.

    • 3 12
      Hold your horse, one step at a time
      • Genuine Moshe
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:55

      You are dealing with individuals ignorant of the Halacha. So first, they have to understand and acknowledge that Jerusalem is the undivided eternal capital of Israel and Arabs have no rights on our capital. Second, they have to understand and acknowledge ארץ ישראל לעם ישראל Then only then, Halacha could be taught to these individuals.

    • 18 5
      Bollox
      • David
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:21

      Liberal Judaism is closer to the spirit of Judaism than the twisted version adapted for Zionism by the Orthodox.

  • 12. 7 1
    70%
    • Sherlock Holmes
    • 13.07.10
    • 12:56

    If half the world's Jews live in Israel where Reform and Conservative are very minor players and over a million Jews in France and the UK are also mainly Orthodox, how can 70% of world Jewry be Reform or Conservative. I would have thought it more likely that 70% of world Jewry are not afilliated.

    • 4 2
    • 6 2
      UK Jews
      • Dan
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:19

      Firstly, there's only around 300,000 and they're not all Orthodox - there are steadily growing Reform and Masorti movements (admittedly not as fast-growing as Haredim, but still - growing). And if the majority of Jews in the USA are Reform/Conservative, then that adds at least 5 million Jews.

    • 6 9
      Reform Membership
      • Susan Kfar saba
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:28

      They claim a lot of members and that they are the biggest denomination, but in reality about half of their people arent Jews.

    • 2 2
      UK and France
      • Sherlock Holmes
      • 13.07.10
      • 23:44

      The UK and France together have about one million Jews. Of afilliated Jews in the UK about 75% are at least nominally Orthodox. France has about 700,000 Jews, mainly Sephardim who are nominally Orthodox. A very high percentage of American Jews are not afilliated, so saying 70% are Reform and Conservative is impossible.

  • 11. 20 26
    im sorry
    • yves
    • 13.07.10
    • 12:47

    but i see the reform as goyim. If they want they can do another religion and just dont bother us. Im a jewish orthodox, im not shomer shabbat but i dont want to change the rules and i know that if i want my kids to be jewish i have to get marry with a jewish woman, no EXCUSE.

    • 14 8
      That's your right
      • LM
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:29

      But it doesn't mean you have to impose your beliefs and your way of living your Judaism to the rest of us. You also sound much contradictory: if you consider yourself an orthodox Jew, how come you're not a shomer shabbat? I think the other orthodox Jews are going to see you as a goy. Changing rules as life goes on is an important sign of being alive. Otherwise, we would be stoning people, especially women, like other religions that haven't learned how to change the rules.

    • 7 3
      bahhh
      • yves
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:54

      i think u know are missing the point: i know what are the rules, i've studied but we are free to respect and not to respect (FREE WILL). I dont respect some of them, i know im wrong, but i dont want to change them because these rules are keeping us alive since more than 5thousand years... sachten

    • 2 6
      Then YOU'RE the goy!
      • Dan
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:25

      "im not shomer shabbat but i dont want to change the rules" Really, then by those standards I guess you're the goy pretending to be Jewish. Don't you see that it's not black-and-white? If you were to convert, you'd be rejected. Why can't someone learn about halacha and not strictly observe it for purposes of conversion? You're holding converts up to a higher standard than your own.

    • 10 3
      Hypocrite
      • Jew - Or Used to Be
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:27

      I'm sure I can find at least one or two ways in which you do not follow the Torah. Perhaps you are as much a goyim as all the reform Jews. Once you start unwinding the ball of thread, it can unspool quite far.

    • 6 4
      habibi
      • Yves
      • 13.07.10
      • 16:56

      Im jew. my mother is jew my father is jew and all my family is jew: no goym in my family. no reform, no liberal no Chrisnuccà only TORAH aballak habibi

    • 2 4
      Genetic testing
      • Hypocrite
      • 13.07.10
      • 19:53

      Perhaps you should be genetically tested to insure what you say is true. Since observance makes no difference in being a Jew for those that are already considered Jewish, I believe genetic tests should be mandated on the maternal side. It makes no difference what your father or other family is. This is the only way to ensure you are indeed a Jew as you say.

    • 5 0
      Jew - Or Used to Be
      • Hypocrite
      • 13.07.10
      • 20:02

      Oh by the way. Since my mother is Jewish I'm also just as much Jewish as you are. Wouldn't matter if I ate pork and shrimp all day or if my sister decided to marry an Arab. BTW - unless you can prove me wrong there is no discussion of Conversion practices in the Torah.

    • 4 0
      a convert is different
      • Judith
      • 13.07.10
      • 20:35

      They must observe the laws. You , by contrast, are Jewish even if you don't. Conversion is discussed in the oral Torah.

    • 7 1
      Oral Torah
      • Hypocrite
      • 13.07.10
      • 22:34

      The original post made the claim that Reform Jews aren't Jews. I know many Orthodox feel this way, which is obviously incorrect. The oral Torah is open to interpretation. Rabbis debated its meaning before codifying it in the Talmud, Mishnah and Midrash. That is the basis for various Jewish denominations, even amongst the Orthodox. To claim one singular way of practicing Judaism is incorrect and wrong. I'm sure a case could be made in the Torah for instance for accepting homosexuals. In fact, I bet a case could be made for almost anything.

    • 1 3
      Cannot be orthodox with out being Shomer Shabbat
      • Chaim Ben Kahan
      • 14.07.10
      • 11:11

      The difference is that you do not justify your actions and claim working that on Shabbat is "progressive Judaism" like the Reform do.

    • 0 0
      Oral Torah
      • Uri
      • 15.07.10
      • 01:21

      With regards to your comments regarding the Oral Torah. Whilst you are correct in saying that the Rabbis debated the meaning of the Oral Torah before codifying it, you are incorrect in your belief that a 'case can be made for almost anything'. There is no place in Judaism for homosexuals or for accepting them. The Written Torah explicitely states that "if a man were to lie with another man, the way a man lies with a woman, it is an abomination before G-d!" The Torah doesn't use the terminology of abomination very often. In fact this is one of the few places where it does.

  • 10. 16 16
    Basket of Judaism
    • Ephraim
    • 13.07.10
    • 12:25

    There's no such thing as "Basket of Judaism". It simply doesn't exist. She made it up. If pluralism is so valued by Reform, who do they insist on conversion? Why not accept non-Jews into the Reform Movement without having them convert? That Reform is interested in conversion indicates that their commitment to pluralism is lacking or that they have another agenda...

    • 14 9
      You don't understand a thing
      • LM
      • 13.07.10
      • 15:35

      Reform Judaism doesn't insist on conversion. It just opens a more friendly, more human option to the one presented by the intolerant orthodox. Believe it or not, there are people who want to become Jewish, who really like us and want to be just like us but when they try, they only find the orthodox path. Good for the Reform Movement, good for Rabbi Galia Sadan and all the other rabbis at Beit Daniel.

    • 3 1
      Exactly
      • Pete
      • 13.07.10
      • 21:59

      Why do they continue this charade? What makes it Jewish??? Bagels after services? The Pope wears a Kipah-is he Jewish too? Would a country allow a new immigrant to be a citizen without first insisting that person follow its laws? Of course not. Thiridiculous.

    • 6 3
      Ger Toshav vs Ger Tzedek
      • Antigonos
      • 14.07.10
      • 12:31

      There have always been goyim who were attracted to aspects of Judaism but could not bring themselves to actually convert. The ger toshav has a high degree of participation in Jewish life, and is accorded respect -- but he's NOT a Jew. Only when he/she undergoes halachic conversion [ger tzedek] does he/she become one of us. Giving equal rights to a real Jew and a "resident alien" just isn't right.

  • 9. 5 12
    LMW proves them wrong
    • Orthodox Jew
    • 13.07.10
    • 11:47

    Funny LMW is all worried about his or her physical body, maybe Jews will be under attack in the world again and so on. And like all people who lack faith, LMW does not give a hoot about whether or not he or she is really Jewish spiritually. Never thinks that maybe the conversion didn't really work in G-d's eyes. That's exactly what is wrong with Reform conversions.

  • 8. 33 4
    We can't ignore Reform Jews - even if we want too
    • Zeev
    • 13.07.10
    • 11:44

    I grew up in a Reform family. I studied in the Reform movement. I no longer identify as Reform. I disagree with many decisions and realities they represent. But, they are still the largest single group of Jews in the world. They are part of our vitality, and our problems. They are not our only source of problems or vitality. They are Jews. To ignore or berate them is only to relive the Tisha B'Av. Love them as fellow Jews. Engage them in dialogue. But to deny them, is to cut Klal Yisrael by half. I always thought that only antisemites shared that goal. Which side are you on?

    • 1 6
      Big words Zeev
      • Yaron
      • 13.07.10
      • 17:11

      It is intellectually dishonest to say that Reform is the "Largest Single group". I would argue that maybe Satmar or Ger might be. One can not change laws to be able to inflate numbers. IF you consider them Jewish because they identify with Jews, then what amkes them bigger then the Christian Rigyht in America who are even bigger and identify with JEwsa. They even think of themselves as the spiritual heirs to Israel.

    • 1 4
      Reform must learn how to be better Jews
      • Chaim Ben Kahan
      • 14.07.10
      • 11:15

      I have been nauseated any time I have been exposed to reform Judaism and I was raised Conservative. One can expect bread and pasta on the table at a Reform seder, Pork on yom kippur, Shrimp at Bar Mitzvahs and so on. They do so to spite Judaism and argue (like Christians) that their modern interpretation allows them to eat pork on Yom Kippur and that their Judaism is just as legitimate. We must find a way to educate Reform Jews on how to act like a Jew.

    • 0 0
      Reform practice
      • Chazzanit
      • 15.07.10
      • 16:49

      As a Reform Jew, who has been at annual seders each year in many different venues, including individual Reform Jewish homes and Reform synagogues have never witnessed Reform Jews partaking in bread and pasta at their seders. Nor have I ever witnessed any Reform Jews eating pork on Yom Kippur and shrimp at Bar Mitzvah receptions being held at a Reform Synagogue. This is an example of lies being spread to denigrate and defame Reform Jews.

  • 7. 30 9
    MOST ISRAELIS ARE IGNORANT OF THE FACTS
    • TW
    • 13.07.10
    • 10:02

    45% of world Jewry live in North America 41% of North American Jews affilated with a synagogue are Reform. They are the largest Jewish movement outside Israel and should not be ignored by Israel.

    • 9 15
      remember
      • yves
      • 13.07.10
      • 13:13

      remember quality not quantity! i prefer less orthordox than more reform

    • 3 2
      BRAVO!
      • megacephalus
      • 13.07.10
      • 13:45

      ...and in my [New England] experience a great many Reform Jews chose to worship and be members of the UUA, the Unitarian-Universalists...

  • 6. 18 5
    reform converted Jews
    • LMW
    • 13.07.10
    • 08:49

    I am curious. With this new law, will reform converted Jews be left to die if there comes a time that all Jews need to return home to Israel? Will the rabbinate courts write us notes saying we aren't 'real' Jews so there is no need to kill us? And how does the rabbinate feel Hashem will feel about this? just curious.

    • 6 10
      Go to a Yeshiva..Learn...Then
      • Yaron
      • 13.07.10
      • 12:41

      you won't have to wonder. You'll know/understand what G-d thinks and what the Rabbi's explain. Simple!!

    • 9 5
      converts
      • Joseph
      • 13.07.10
      • 13:08

      Unlike Christianity we do not look for converts or believe you must be one of us to find eternal life in G-d's Presence. A G-d-fearing Gentile is better than a High Priest who is not righteous. A convert must genuinely believe in and practise Judaism.

  • 5. 15 49
    Reform Jews are clueless about Judaism, much less about Israel
    • RB
    • 13.07.10
    • 07:36

    Ignore the leftist, atheist, and Reform American Jews. They are inconsequential and working against the best interests of the Jewish people.

  • 4. 23 37
    "the basket of judaism"?
    • ben
    • 13.07.10
    • 06:33

    judaism is a religion not a basket. and in jewish scriptures it CLEARLY states, several times, what a jew must do in order to live a righteous life. the "reform" ignore this. they IGNORE the fact that it says IN PLAIN LANGUAGE that homosexuality is wrong, that women are not on the same level as men (although important in different ways), that we are not to mix with the goyim. these people aren't jews, they've invented their own fairytale religion.

    • 27 2
      equality
      • Franky
      • 13.07.10
      • 08:27

      Where does Tenach say in plain language that women are not on the same level as men? Genesis 1 says they are on the same level!

    • 17 6
      Judaism should be a basket!
      • Nebby Murts
      • 13.07.10
      • 10:13

      It is completely ignorant to state that, because these words are contained within the torah, homosexuality is wrong and gender inequality is okay in the contemporary world! We live in a postmodern society thats should and is (I optimistically believe) moving towards egalitarianism based on equality on many different levels, whether they be relating to culture, authority and decision making, gender or sexuality. I believe in G-d, as well as in the divinity of the torah to some extent. I also believe that many of the values it imaprts on us both literally and metaphorically are of undeniable importance. But I do not believe in denying the right of an individual to pursue the life path they desire, when their actions could not in the slightest be considered harmful to others nor selfish.

    • 7 10
      Post-Modern
      • Ephraim
      • 13.07.10
      • 12:30

      If the Reform reject the divinity of T'Nach, which is the source for conversion, and they promote egalitarianism and pluralism, why do they desire conversion for their members? Why not accept non-Jews into their movement? Doesn't their pursuit of conversion indicate chauvinism they claim to reject?

    • 10 1
      Equality
      • Sherlock Holmes
      • 13.07.10
      • 13:01

      The Torah says men and women are 100% equal in G-d's eyes; they just have different roles. Samson Raphael Hirsch writes a great deal about equality of the sexes, long before it was a fashionable issue. His Orthodox schools in Frankfurt gave girls a top level Jewish and secular education.

    • 8 4
      Well actually...
      • Nebby Murts
      • 13.07.10
      • 13:38

      Firstly it is NOT true that the Reform reject the divinity of the T'Nach. You are claiming that Reform and Secular are synonymous. Many reform Jews are secular, but so are many of the Orthodox Jews in Israel. Reform Judaism believes in G-d, but they also see religion as a way of communicating with g-d (rather than as a dogma). Therefore, pluralism and egalitarianism are acceptable, as they both mesh with the values of modern society and allow individuals the freedom to express their religious and spiritual needs how they see fit. You then ask why not accept non-jews and question whether or not the pursuit of conversion indicates chauvinism. This is ridiculous! Firstly, Reform DOES accept non-Jews in the sense that this stream sees them as equals. If you mean accepting them into the religion then this is another matter entirely. At the end of the day non-Jews ARE and SHOULD be accepted into Judaism - through conversion. Conversion is not even imperative because of any sense of ownership or ethnicity, but also so that (after the obvious complications of halacha and the right of children to be Jewish) the person can learn about the belief system they wish to follow. Furthermore, to say that the pursuit of conversion indicates chauvinism is nothing short of far-fetched. At the end of the day, conversion IS egalitarian and PLURALISTIC as it allows for ANYONE to become a member of this culture if they wish to - it does not necessarily equate to jewish lineage etc. Reform conversion is more accomodating of non-Jews as it does not require the individual to become obersvant - and why should they have to? I might also add that the cycnicism you display towards non-Jews and their right to convert through reform illuminates your pessimistic impression of them. If you think that, because we are 'the chosen people', this makes us better than anyone else in the world purely based on their religion, you should be ashamed of yourself. For a Jew to be unaccomodating of other cultures and ethnicities is a tragedy, especially given our history.

  • 3. 10 7
    Israel Jacobson...not a rabbi...
    • Rabbi Joe Murray
    • 13.07.10
    • 06:07

    Part of the beauty of the story of Israel Jacobson, and only a part, is that he introduced significant reforms without his being a rabbi. His life continues to serve as an example to any and every lay person who wishes to make change, and it is a shame that his accomplishments are not more well known. Joe Murray, HUC-JIR '09

  • 2. 28 32
    Reform Judaism and Israel
    • Jerome Stoll
    • 13.07.10
    • 05:46

    I am a Reform American Jew and I am boycotting Israel until the government stops giving power to the Haradi. I am going to Egypt this year, but I will not come to Isreal. May be if all the members of the Reform Movement boycott Israel, things would change quickly.

  • 1. 40 8
    Conversion
    • 13.07.10
    • 03:13

    I think you are right in opposing the bill. I think the country is wrong to entangle politics and religion, with the Rabbinate given such authority as it has. In the US we struggle daily to insure the separation of church and state. I think Israel, a country used to struggle and survival, should make the same distinction.

    • 1 0
      Israel Has Never Been Able to Solve This Dilemma
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 14.07.10
      • 16:08

      In times past, when the religious parties were much weaker, there wer livable compromises but now the religious parties hold much greater power and have become even more uncompromising. Zionism cannot solve this dilemma of seperation of religion and state since in the minds of the religious who hold so much power, the state itself should be run by Jewish law.