Jerusalem mayor, are you causing a third Intifada?
Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat talks about his plans for East Jerusalem.
By Nir Hasson Tags: Jerusalem Israel newsPalestinian residents have put up 88 homes without building permits in the Gan Hamelekh complex, in East Jerusalem's Silwan neighborhood. Gan Hamelekh - "the king's garden" in Hebrew - is at the juncture of the Kidron and Ben-Hinnom gorges, 500 meters from the Temple Mount and 100 meters from the City of David.
Mayor Nir Barkat intends to demolish some of these buildings, to issue permits for most of them and to create a park that will attract tourist on the site.
What is your plan for Silwan?
"Above all, good news for its inhabitants, even though understandably it may be hard for them to say this in public. The proposal offers a conceptual change in my thinking: not only to enforce the law and court rulings on the illegal structures but also to help the families to build new homes in accordance with the law.
"In other words, issuing permits retroactively for dozens of homes on the eastern side and granting construction permit for additional homes, which will move from the east to the west [of the Kidron Valley].
"On the eastern side of the Kidron we will add 3,000 square meters for commercial use as well as homes for all those who move from the western side, which will remain an open public space.
All together, you get an anchor for tourism to which people can come for shopping, a good restaurant and a cafe, and in addition there is room for everyone to live. The plan will provide jobs for residents as well as homes and quality of life.
"The situation today is that the vast majority of the homes are unauthorized and the courts have ordered their demolition. Under the new situation, not only will the houses be made legal but 2,000 square meters of commercial enterprises and public buildings will be added for the benefit of the residents. There will be classrooms, day care centers, kindergartens, a gym, a swimming pool, a well-baby center and so forth. The alternative to a plan that takes into consideration the existing situation is the demolition of all of the homes."
Can you understand the suspicion and distrust on the part of the Palestinian residents?
"Yes. After more than 40 years of neglect one can understand that. But the suspicion is unwarranted. I have heard expressions such as 'a home demolition plan.' It's true that when you upgrade the entire complex with a 'tear down/rebuild' program, 20 people will move a few dozen meters to the east. But to come and say that the intention is to expel them? These are irresponsible, baseless portrayals."
Are you frustrated by the gap between your perception of the plan, as benefiting the residents, and the headlines about the imminent eruption of a third intifada?
"No, not at all. Unfortunately I know the media are the last to grasp what is happening. On the ground the project is progressing nicely. People recognize that this is a serious plan and are beginning to make comments. Media spin doesn't upset me. I would be happy, of course, if the media reported it differently.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked you to wait, and to continue to negotiate with the residents. Will you destroy the homes even without their agreement?
"The alternative is to destroy all of them, or to not carry out the court rulings and to leave the inferior living conditions in place. I would prefer to implement my plan, which speaks of putting things in order."
The Palestinians ask who is the king of the "king's garden," and the answer is obvious - David. They believe that another City of David compound will be created - a religious-nationalistic park under the settlers' control. Are you willing to discuss its character with them?
"I have been asked whether the Elad association [which promotes the Judaization of East Jerusalem] is connected with the plan. Unequivocally, no. The municipality is behind the project and the nature of the park is open to discussion. We will want to suit it to the millions of visitors who will want to come.
The site is an international asset that must be open to all. There is no intention of spiting anyone. That is part of the residents' distrust. There is no doubt that we must develop trust. I hope that they will understand that I mean what I say and I say what I mean."
At the press conference [convened by Barkat last Tuesday to announce his plans for developing the Gan Hamelekh complex], you made a remark that was untypical for a Jerusalem mayor - that the city and the state bear responsibility for the problem of unauthorized construction in East Jerusalem.
"There are 20,000 illegally built structures in the city. That is undoubtedly a systemic failure. There is no excuse for illegal behavior, but the state must look in the mirror and recognize that something is wrong. We will try to take as lenient an approach as possible, to reduce friction while taking the prevailing situation into consideration. We shall create reasonable, practical plans and implement them."
Did you select Silwan and Gan Hamelekh as the prototype for dealing with unauthorized building in Jerusalem because of the commitment of you and your political partners not to evacuate Beit Yonatan [the seven-floor apartment building housing eight Jewish families that was built without permits in the heart of Silwan by the nationalist Ateret Cohanim organization, and whose demolition the state has ordered]?
"No. I began there because of the state comptroller's report. I took responsibility instead of burying my head in the sand. This is a comprehensive solution that has nothing to do with [the identity of] the people living there, Jews or Arabs."
In conclusion, to another matter: Last week we had the privilege of seeing the trial run of Jerusalem's light railway. Should people in Tel Aviv be jealous yet, or will the project continue to be synonymous with failure?
"When I entered office I placed a real question mark over the light rail project, which accelerated many measures. It will take another month or two but in the end it will come right.
"In the past six months I have been busy mainly with the next stages. The first rail line is a serious and worthy improvement, but we plan to announce a network of lines so that everything can connect with everything else. In Jerusalem, everything needs to connect."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
There's actually more than one answer. One is because the settlers in Gaza, just as with the West Bank and East Jerusalem, settled there illegally to begin with-according to international law. Secondly, the difference in the level of concern you accuse Smith of is based on historical precedents. The promise of new homes is being made to Palestinians, and we all know how far an Israeli promise goes whenever it regards Palestinians. And finally, Israel promised to relocate the Israelis who were expelled from their homes in Gaza, and an Israeli promise to an Israeli is usually good as gold. But then last I heard, there were still many who'd not received the dividends of that promise, which if true, is completely inexcusable on the part of the Israeli government. However, it provides yet another reason for the Palestinians affected by these plans to be concerned about their future residence. Bottom line Freddy, Smith's concern for one, and not the other, is because in Israel and the territories it occupies, Israeli Jews are taken of, and Palestinians are not.
Illegal? The homes were built in the 1950s -- legally -- under Jordanian rule. How can it be illegal? Is anyone shocked that the plan to "legalize" the Palestinian structures also includes the legalization of a jewish settelment? The world sees what is going on. This charade won't be continuing for much longer.
To continue the metaphor that Leah brilliantly points out: Nir Birkat is the abusive husband who won't stop beating his innocent wife (aka the innocent Palestinian residents of East of Jerusalem). Birkat needs to be stopped at once. Don't blame the Palestinians. Good point Leah.
Thanks for your perceptive posts here on Talkback. You are quite right. If I would be a Palestinian I would not trust mayor Nir Barkat until I would see the replacement house built for me in the area with the physical proof of ownership in my hand. Why did Barkat not admit on becoming Jerusalem mayor in November 2008 that East Jerusalem had been systematically neglected and things were going to change. For anyone interested in the issue go to Ir Amim's website.
"I wonder why you want the Pals to get that the Jews did not get when moved out of Gaza ? I did not read anything from you telling the Jews not to move from Gaza until something is already built for them....Why should it be different for Israeli Arabs ???" 1. Moving out of Gaza was a sovereign decision by those in power, imposed upon their fellow Israeli citizens, who have full rights. 2. Israel has revoked numerous Jerusalem residence permits from Arabs on the slightest pretexts. 3. Israel has a tendency to encroach upon and disenfranchise Arabs, whether in Israel or in the "territories". The Arab residents are right to be cautious; what Smith said is entirely correct. Several months spent out of Jerusalem while waiting for their replacement homes can result in their residency permits being revoked in a heartbeat. And you can be sure there are people watching out to make that happen.
by not doing so will invite many more illegal costructions.
Goodness gracious, you'd think that the pals have been great neighbors recently. What a fantasy.
It may not have occurred to you, but the Israelis in Gaza had no right to be there under international law. Their presence was a violation of the law, and an excuse for oppression and terrorism against the native population; while the Palestinians in East Jerusalem are the native population, which Israel should not be oppressing. Is that clear? Having said that, there is a strong case that the Israeli government should have treated the Gaza Israelis better. Not because of legal rights (as illegal settlers they had none), but because the Israeli government had been complicit in their illegality, and then turned its back on them when evacuating them. But to use the Israeli government's failure to acknowledge its complicity in the illegal settlement in Gaza to justify its oppression of the Jerusalem Arabs is morally bankrupt. Try harder next time.
The expulsion from Gaza is exactly the reason why these families must see concrete proof of alternative housing before moving out. If you were one of these residents, would you believe the promises of the same government that threw thousands of Jews in the street a few years earlier in Gaza?
that is why Israeli Jews living in Jews only illegal squats in "Occupied Gaza" are not the same as Israeli Arabs living in Israel. get it now Freddy. Israel should never have placed them theer in the first place so you had best argue with the GOI.
yea, just like the Gaza refugees, why should these Palestinians be treated any better? They are there illegally, maybe we should add wifi and cable to their new homes, nothing but the best for these squatters!! Have you seen how these people live? They can't and dont take care of anything, they just want to grab what is not theirs.
I wonder why you want the Pals to get that the Jews did not get when moved out of Gaza ? I did not read anything from you telling the Jews not to move from Gaza until something is already built for them....Why should it be different for Israeli Arabs ???
They won't openly admit it but Jerusalem Arabs would prefer to live under Israeli control than Fatah or Hamas.
Let Abbas deal with them.
I was wondering if the Palestinians will already have homes built that they can move into before their old homes are demolished? You see if I was a Palestinian I wouldn't move until I saw concrete, pun intended, evidence that I did in fact have another residence in East Jerusalem to move to. Otherwise I would be suspicious that after I'd agree to move out my family and me would all be declared illegal immigrants and deported to Gaza or the Jordanian border.
Wonderful plans !!! One question to Barkat. Do you have enough years left in your lifetime to correct the Jerusalem mess of 3000years.???
The abusive spouse (or terrorists) are the PROBLEM. Keep your blame where it belongs! Don't blame the victim for the aggressors violence.