Cordless phones emit as much radiation as cell phones
By Amitai Ziv and Ronny Linder-GanzCordless telephones emit as much radiation as cell phones, the Health Ministry stated yesterday in a warning to the general public.
The radiation emitted by cordless phones is non-ionizing, the same as cell phones. Still, the ministry says it's better to use regular landline telephones.
Non-ionizing radiation is a form of electromagnetic radiation that does not possess enough energy to cause ionization in matter, the Environmental Protection Ministry explains. Its wide spectrum includes ultra-violet light, visible light, infrared radiation, radio frequency and more.
"Information passes through the base unit and the handset [the mobile unit - the actual phone] in the form of radio waves," the ministry explains.
While studies into the potential hazards of cell-phone use are ongoing, on its website the Health Ministry counsels the public to err on the side of caution.
It also offers practical suggestions for careful use of cordless phones, but first and foremost advises that whenever possible - both at home and at work - use regular phones instead.
As for practical advice, the Health Ministry says that when using a portable phone of any type, it is better to use the speakerphone than to put the handset to your ear. Don't install the base unit of a cordless phone in the bedroom, children's room or office, where you spend much of your time. If the handset isn't in use, return it to the base unit (the charger ), because the whole time it's not on that base unit it's emitting radiation.
The recommendations were consolidated by Prof. Sigal Sadetzki, director of the cancer unit at the Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research at Sheba Medical Center. Sadetzki is the Israeli researcher who participated in the international Interphone study, which investigated the correlation between illness and the use of mobile phones. The study, published about two months ago, did not find that 10 years of cell-phone usage led to a greater chance of developing malignant or benign tumors in the brain, among users speaking less than 30 minutes a day. But it also concluded that "heavy users" - which means they speak at least 30 minutes a day on their mobile phones - do have a 40% greater chance of developing a brain tumor.
Why now?
So why would the ministry publish a warning about cordless phones now? There are no new studies out, says Sadetzki. But following the outcome of the Interphone study and the fact that Israelis are very heavy cellular users, ministry officials thought it appropriate to advise the public that cordless phones also emit non-ionizing radiation, just like cell phones.
"Not everybody realizes that while at home, people are exposed to the same non-ionizing radiation emitted by cell phones," Sadetzki says.
If anything, Stelian Gelberg, head of the noise and radiation abatement division at the Environmental Protection Ministry, claims exposure to cordless phones can actually be worse than cell phones.
Cell phone emissions vary according to distance from the antenna, he explains, while cordless phones emit the same intensity of radiation all the time, irrespective of their distance from the base unit. Mix in length of phone calls from the comfort of your home, and you wind up with greater exposure from cordless phones, he says.
Eurocom Digital Communications, which sells a variety of portable phones, said that all its Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT ) phones meet international standards, including the ones set by the Communications Ministry. Their new phones also have an eco-mode function that adapts the transmission level from the base unit according to its distance from the handset and the conditions, thus reducing transmission strength by as much as 90%, the company added.
|
Sigal Sadetzki |
| Photo by: Eyal Toueg |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
There is more and more discussion about the health effects of wireless technology and non-ionizing radiation. Even the American media can't stop the snowballing of one study after another that confirms the devastating health and environmental problems we will soon be facing if something isn't done to reel in this nightmare. Enough is not being done by cities, counties, states and the Federal Government. What is being done is everything to shield the telecoms from responsibility and liability. Initially cell phones were released with no pre-market safety testing. Health studies were suppressed and the 4 trillion dollar a year industry was given a pass with no consideration of the carnage that is and will be facing us. It is said that city governments are "not allowed" to discuss health issues when licensing the placement of towers. They should anyway. Is it not the moral and legal obligation of our governments to look after and protect our health and welfare?? When did this become an obsolete concept? On it's face, the 1996 telecommunications act is unconstitutional, a cover-up and a license to kill. A cell tower is a microwave weapon capable of causing cancer, genetic damage and a host of other very serious health problems. The telecoms are shielded from "health concerns" as a valid consideration when challenging the location of a cell tower. Free speech? We don't use it anyway. "Health Concerns" why? What do they know and when did they know it? The Government and the Military have known for over 50 years that radio frequency is harmful to all biological systems. Bees, bats, humans, plants and trees are all affected by it. While people complain about cell towers going in next to schools we allow the school board to install wi fi in all the schools and irradiate our kids for 6-7 hours each day before they go home and let their parents finish the job with DECT portable phones, wi fi and Wii's. A tsunami of cancers and early alzheimer's await our kids while the School Board won't even consider adding to the health curriculum information on "safer" cell phone use and the dangers of wireless technology. We teach about alcohol, tobacco, drugs and safe sex but not about cell phone use. Young people under the age of 20 are 420% more at risk of forming brain tumors because of their soft skulls, brain size and cell turn over time. We are in a wireless trance and many scientists are in a state of panic as they see this thing expand with no safety testing or public education programs in place. Related topics: http://www.wirelesswatchblog.com