Cold peace with Turkey could sting some defense contractors
Continued tension with Turkey could eat into the business of Israeli defense firms like Elbit Systems.
By Yoram Gabison Tags: Turkey Israel news Israel defenseThe recent cancellation of military exercises involving the Israel Defense Forces and the Turkish army ratcheted up tensions with Turkey. Nine months after Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan harshly criticized Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, the Turkish military has opted against joint maneuvers with the IDF. A continuation of the cold wave could eat into the business of Israeli defense firms like Elbit Systems.
Elbit Systems has been involved in three major projects in Turkey. The company was a subcontractor to Israel Military Industries from 2004 to 2008 in upgrading the M-60 tank, a $780 million job of which Elbit Systems' share was worth $183 million. Sources say the work has been completed and Elbit has been paid. Currently Elbit System's major Turkish project involves a pilotless drone deal worth $200 million signed this year; the company partnered with Israel Aerospace Industries.
Another Turkish project involves Elbit's electro-optics subsidiary, El-Op, and IAI's Elta unit to provide Turkey's air force with integrated visual surveillance equipment, mainly for aerial photography. The overall price tag is $141 million over the four years ending 2012. El-Op's share of the deal is $87 million.
Analysts Gil Datner and Gilad Alper of Excellence Investments say Turkey is a major European market for Elbit, adding that there have been concerns since Cast Lead about how relations with Turkey would affect Israeli defense contractors. The Turkish military is seen as agreeing with the government when it comes to relations with Israel.
Datner and Alper say two other factors helped convince them to downgrade their recommendation for Elbit Systems to underperform: an erosion in profitability from a fall in short-term orders and stiffer competition due to the entry of major U.S. firms into Elbit's market niches. These include the manufacture of drones as well as control and command systems.
Datner and Alper say this risk is particularly large because of the growing prospect of defense cuts in the United States and Europe, particularly in Britain.
On August 13, Datner and Alper lowered their price target for Elbit Systems to NIS 220, then 14% below and today 12.5% below the company's share price. Sources close to Elbit say all the firm's projects in Turkey are proceeding as planned, and some analysts are not very worried about business there.
"The cancellation of the exercise renews concerns about continued cooperation with the Turkish army and the cancellation of existing deals between the Turkish army and Israeli defense companies," said Yoav Burgan, an analyst at Leader Capital Markets.
Burgan, however, says these concerns have been blown out of proportion. "Despite the crisis atmosphere, the prospect is low that Elbit Systems' and Israel Aerospace Industries' latest joint deal in Turkey will be canceled," he said. "In any case, it doesn't involve substantial risk to Elbit Systems' overall work load, which stood at $5.1 billion at the end of the second quarter."
Burgan said Turkey's annual military budget is currently at $21 billion, of which $7 billion goes to procurement. The defense budget is expected to increase 6% annually over the next two years. Although Turkey is a major customer of Israeli defense contractors, Burgan says the Turks are not a substantial client of Elbit Systems. Turkey is considered part of Elbit's European division, which represents 25% of the company's sales.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
he is most moderate of all your politicians. he is leftist if i am not wrong.i think Barak see this game of u.s.. game for pipeline to caspian see turkey closing to armenia and daily subjects focused to israel.Barak knows it is temprorary. also i knew greatest jew ever lived. carl marx. (great man) religion is poison.
ML: "Why then, as it demands the right of a Legal Occupying Power, does Israel refuse to perform the responsibilities of the Legal Occupying Power of Gaza?" In no particular order: * It is cheaper this way. * Israel has bigger fish to fry. * Israel lost interest in RUNNING Gaza when the degraded aquifer made the settlements non-viable. * Israel sees no need to hold consistent positions on any subject, so why should Gaza be any different? * Israel likes holding up the experimental lab rats in Gaza as "evidence" that Pals can't govern themselves. The Israelis think that those are ALL perfectly rational reasons, which is why they get so upset when anyone else tells them that what they're doing is coo-coo-crazy.
Israel is the legal occupying power in Gaza. It has the right to control ALL access to Gaza from outside. This is most clear, and most true under international law. Why then, as it demands the right of a Legal Occupying Power, does Israel refuse to perform the responsibilities of the Legal Occupying Power of Gaza? I did not create this dichotomy. The people of Gaza did not. Israel, the Legal Occupying Power in Gaza, which refuses to surrender that authority, is the single party which refuses to honor it's responsibilities as the Legal Occupying Power in Gaza. What nation can deny this? What happens if the people of Gaza announce that they are a nation because Israel refuses to exercise it's responsibilities as the Legal Occupying Power over Gaza? Israel has chosen a suicide course of action which cannot survive question. It is an insane course of action which cannot benefit Israel. It is, however, the course of action which israel has chosen. Israel's friends are helpless.
Don't allow Turkey to dictate in the ME.Their support for Iran and Syria should be punished.
The first and loudest response of the Netanyahu government was to signal that it would get even for Turkey's actions. Then Barak suddenly started getting cordial to repair of relations. Now we understand why. Netanyahu might have been concerned with only how he could benefit by appealing to his political supporters, but Barak had political benefactors to consider. While I understand that honest politicians have few prospects, isn't it occasionally better if an few have a shred of honesty?