By ignoring international law, Israel is only hurting itself

The ICC can hang her out to dry on EVERY single violation. She also DECLARED her boundaries to the UN. She EXCLUDED from those boundaries the WB, Gaza, and Jerusalem. Those boundaries are STILL her only legal boundaries.

In this case, with a distinct French pronounciation.

Attack the character of the messenger! Ad hominems show how there is a deficit of rational, logical arguments against the points raised. Why? Because there is none.

re Fourth Geneva Convention and Road Map and inadmissibility of territory aquirement by force but they won't post it.

Laws of War 1907 Art. 55. “The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct.” Montevideo Convention 1934 Art 11 : The contracting states definitely establish as the rule of their conduct the precise obligation not to recognize territorial acquisitions or special advantages which have been obtained by force whether this consists in the employment of arms, in threatening diplomatic representations, or in any other effective coercive measure. UN Charter 1945 Art 73 Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories

I consistently argued these facts for many years here. But it's the censorship that helps Israel continue with the illusion amongst themselves of a "Greater Israel" - So be it. These facts are undeniable, they have been for many years, and Israel is starting to suffer what will only become much worse in its land and resource theft, and its continual violations of international law and international human rights law. The Hasbara and censorship no longer work. And now Israel is in the middle of the dreaded One State Solution(tm) that even Haaretz has helped along. Oh well... I wrote many times many years ago, time's up. And now it has been up long enough that reality is starting for many in the US to sink in. Israel is a rogue state causing prolonged problems in the Middle East and beyond.

But the thoughtful Zionists always have to throw SOMETHING to the rabid.

Israel must obey the law of Israel.

The same concoction that gave Israel a State? Obviously a bad decision.

why Palestinian didn't want lo let split their land in 1948.

Then a One State Solution it is. That, or a 2 State Solution. But the days of having ALL the land under a racist system which only validates people of certain faith, are over. Those are your options.

Israel isn't ceding another inch for another Gaza.

Is that why Hamas wants a Palestinian state including everything from the Jordan to the Mediterranean? The one-state advocates on either side reinforce each other. Remember that it was the Jews who wanted partition in 1947, and partition remains in the long range interest of the Jews, not the Arabs.

The only obstacle are the Zionists who want to create the private club.

Therefore since there has historically never been a Palestinian State the UNGA res 181 is null and void..

to exercise their R2P. We may not know what intentions the members of the JA had in their minds with an eye toward various contingencies. It had been said long bofore that "the rest would not go away." Of course, "acceptance" was a smart tactic. Did the new state in formation not actually agree with King Abdullah to partition the proposed Arab state?

it was rejected by most of the participants. therefore it's moot.

Palestine pre- and post existed Israel.

Learn something. There was never in history any state called Palestine governed by Palestinians. Tell us when did it ever belong to Palestinians? Answer Never. It was never a Pal land to begin with, so your question is invalid.The Palestinians never governed or controlled any land before 1993. To make it simple, please tell me one Palestinian President before 1948? Keep thinking. The Palestinians want a capital, which they never had, in a country that never existed. The Palestinians have nothing to do with the name Palestine. The name Palestine is named after the Philistines, not the Palestinians or any Arab group. The name Palestine was applied by the Romans against the Jews to destroy the name Israel. It was certainly not directed or bestowed to the Arabs in this area. The Philistines were from Crete and came to Israel 3000 years ago and were not Arabs or Muslims. Delilah and Goliath were Philistines. (Philistines died out.) Philistine is the name the Romans renamed Israel as a chagrin against the Jews. Yassir Arafat was not a Philistine, but an ARAB born in Egypt. Philistine originates from the Hebrew verb Palash, which means to invade. So the Arabs who started to call themselves Palestinians in the late 60's are invaders and they want to create an Invadia state.

Palestinians a the melting pot of this ancient crossroads , they are Jews, Christians , Muslims ,Philistine ,Amorites , Cananites ,Byzentinians ,Arabs , European Crusaders etc so before you come over to my hilltop you need to ask permission .

1. That is a ridiculous and spurious argument that lacks any merit whatsoever. There was never a South Sudan until recently either, yet there it is! 2. Israel explicitly mentioned & accepted UNGR181 borders in its declaration of independence in '48; therefore those are the internationally recognised (and legitimate) sovereign borders - nothing less, nothing more. 3. When someone puts their head in the sand, the derriere is exposed in a large way... keep that in mind. :)