• Published 13:34 12.12.09
  • Latest update 22:28 12.12.09

White House unhappy with Iran nuke proposal

Obama administration official says Iran proposal on exchanging uranium is inconsistent with UN plan.

By The Associated Press Tags: Iran nuclear Israel news

The White House expressed unhappiness on Saturday over Iran's announcement that it was ready to exchange uranium for nuclear fuel.

Such a deal would meet a key demand of a United Nations-sponsored effort to defuse fears over Iran's nuclear ambitions. But instead of shipping most of its uranium abroad for processing before it is returned to Tehran, Iran's foreign minister said Saturday that the material instead would be exchanged in batches.

A senior Obama administration official says that proposal is inconsistent with the UN plan.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue, urged Iran to accept the UN offer to help build confidence in claims that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Iran's stockpile of uranium is at the heart of international concerns because it offers Iran a possible pathway to nuclear weapons production if it is enriched to higher levels. Tehran insists it only wants to use the material to produce fuel for power plants and for other peaceful purposes.

Under a UN plan proposed in October and being pushed by Washington and five other world powers, Iran would ship most of its uranium - up to 1,200 kilograms of it - abroad. It would then be enriched to higher levels in Russia, turned into fuel rods in France and returned to power a research reactor in Tehran that produces medical isotopes.

The material in the fuel rods cannot be enriched to higher levels, denying Iran the ability to use it to make weapons.

We accepted the proposal in principle, Foreign Minister Manochehr Mottaki told reporters at a regional security conference in Bahrain.

In what is almost certain to be a deal breaker, however, he spoke of exchanging the material in phases rather than all at once as is called for in the UN plan. He said Iran had offered to make a first shipment of 400 kilograms of enriched uranium.

Carrying it out in slow stages would leave Iran in control of enough uraniumto make a bomb.

Officials at the UN nuclear agency could not be reached for comment Saturday.

In another change to the plan, Iran wants to receive the fuel rods immediately in simultaneous exchanges for its uranium because it says it is worried that France or Russia could renege on the deal.

Another unanswered question is whether the uranium Iran is offering to exchange would actually be shipped out of the country or just left - perhaps under observation - inside its borders in what would present another departure from the UN plan.

Mottaki suggested the exchanges take place on Iran's Kish island, in the Persian Gulf, but he did not clarify whether the uranium would leave Irahian soil.

We gave a clear answer and we responded, and our answer was we accepted in principle but there were differences in the mechanism, he said Saturday, speaking through a translator.

Further confusing matters, as of a few days ago, the UN's nuclear agency had yet to receive a concrete Iranian counterproposal - or a response of any kind - to its initiative.

Mottaki's remarks, in which he insisted a response had been sent, were part of a string of conflicting Iranian statements that began with initial word in October that the country would accept the proposal as is. Several Iranian lawmakers later rejected the plan outright.

Some 15 to 30 kilograms of uranium enriched to levels above 90 percent would be needed to produce a nuclear bomb. Iran has about 1,500 kilograms of 3.5 percent, or low-enriched uranium - enough to produce highly enriched material for two such weapons.

Last month, the 35-nation board of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency endorsed a resolution from the six powers - the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany - criticizing Iran for defying a UN Security Council ban on uranium enrichment and continuing to expand its operations.

It also censured Iran for secretly building a second enrichment facility and demanded that it immediately suspend further construction on it.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said last month that the U.N. offer has been comprehensively rejected by Iran. A diplomat from one of the six powers said Wednesday that America's Western allies were waiting for Washington to formally declare the wait for an Iranian response over, probably by the end of this month.

The six countries are expected to meet next week to discuss what action to take over Iran.

EU leaders said they would support further UN sanctions unless Tehran starts cooperating over its nuclear program.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manochehr Mottaki.

Photo by: (AP)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 24. 0 0
    Alice asked the Cheshire Cat ...
    • Neville Chamberlain
    • 13.12.09
    • 05:52

    How did Iran finally acquired its nuclear bomb? The Cheshire Cat gave a big grin, and replied, " By purchasing one from Pakistan".

  • 23. 0 0
    and isnt it interesting that richard dawkins
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 03:40

    knows that elizabete knows that god exists, while he is lying with his fake satanic propaganda about god delusion? he is clearly another beast agent working for the cartel. and they say there is no conspiracy. this conspiracy stink so much that maybe bees are dying of that stink if not the spray?

  • 22. 0 0
    and it is very intersting how all those states with same boss
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 03:32

    have double appearance now isnt it? they are trying to look like they work for god, while they keep their satanic conspiracy going. this is very interesting.

  • 21. 0 0
    or are those peole robots or ufos yisrael?
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 03:04

    where did they get those eyes? where did the things go wrong for those people? is there a name for that disease yet?

  • 20. 0 0
    and i am completelly sure of one thing. this conflict
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:46

    called nuclear iranian threat is not really about iranian nuclear program but has some hidden agenda. this is a fact. the snake wanna bite further into the middle east. right yisrael?

  • 19. 0 0
    and see this, the beast in elizabetes eyes
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:44

    totally occupying her mind. why dont they help her? people are dying because of her. and whole british government at number 10 and israeli authorizes in knesset. and adding to this secret services and british masonic worldwide branches and all their banks and oil companies and armies of the west, we get the super beast. right yisrael? is idf out yet on an operation terrorizing freedom fighters?

  • 18. 0 0
    and you will be telling me that you dont know that?
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:27

    that you dont know that yisrael?

  • 17. 0 0
    and those snake bite conspiracy puppets
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:25

    will be selling me news that iran is a threat to an average brainwashed slave life?

  • 16. 0 0
    so do you understand now yisrael, that those who
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:15

    holocausted the jews in wwII rule you today and your president is fooling you.

  • 15. 0 0
    and it was this beast yisrael
    • a jew
    • 13.12.09
    • 02:02

    that destroyed wtc, london, madrid, jakarta and so on. this is a fact.

  • 14. 0 0
    Of course this guy is unhappy. The Iranian proposal starts with
    • Richard Pearce
    • 13.12.09
    • 01:17

    the position that Iran is entitled to have a civilian nuclear program, and to purchase fuel rods for its medical reactor (which the NNPT says it is), and then finds a proposal that allows that to happen that satisfies any suspicious viewpoint, and exposes any one who turns it down as either paranoid, or motivated by a need to punish Iran, rather than suspicion.

  • 13. 0 0
    Proposal
    • Matthew Houston
    • 13.12.09
    • 00:50

    How about this: Store the remaining uranium in Iran under 24 hour watch by UN inspectors. That way, it doesn't leave Iran until it goes to Russia, and it also can't be used for weapons.

  • 12. 0 0
    Between Iraq and a hard place
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 12.12.09
    • 23:24

    Iran has two sever technical problems which it's politicians are just beginning to grasp. The Tehran Research Reactor needs to be refueled. And their 'vaunted' Nuclear program is way behind schedule and not capable of producing what they need. There is no reason for the world to make many concessions to Iran at this time. The signals from Russia and China are clear. No veto.

  • 11. 0 0
    The acceptance was not meant to be accepted,
    • Jasper
    • 12.12.09
    • 22:59

    it was to keep the West talking for the next year about how close it was, and to forestall sanctions. How can anyone sanction somebody who accepts? Hee hee hee. Meanwhile the centrifuges go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

  • 10. 0 0
    Reasonable
    • Oz Person
    • 12.12.09
    • 22:48

    Sounds reasonable, you give us the fuel rods when we give you the LRE.

  • 9. 0 0
    Nice work Obama...
    • marat
    • 12.12.09
    • 22:26

    What a fool Obama is...in one fell swoop of rhetoric, he has made both Iran AND N.Korea more aggressive than ever. He seems to prefer to have Islamic Terrorists in the near future use radiological bombs on America and the EU, rather than CONFRONT TERROR REGIMES DIRECTLY. The day will come when Americans will lament that both Bush and John Bolton were not the negotiators with Iran right now. Bolton may be the sanest of all the political figures in cutting throught the CHARADE of negotiating with the Terror Regime of Iran. I consider obama to be the Biggest threat to Western security today. Islamists have read him correctly and like Sharks or Grizzly bears, simply have no fear of him. They have read him correctly.

  • 8. 0 0
    Negotiating... like little lambs in the woods
    • allang
    • 12.12.09
    • 21:12

    Don't you just love Mottaki... the Great, he thinks he's slick... don't he. As if no one understands what 'we accept... BUT' means. Now that we hear the Iranian rationale, I hope negotiators will finally realize how this proposed fuel-rod exchange... is something the Iranians want and need. Otherwise, why would they bother in the first place. Everybody knows the Iranians invented negotiations, but that doesn't mean the US and EU are little lambs in the woods.

  • 7. 0 0
    Obama Wins!! Let's See Him Wiggle His Way Out Of This One.
    • One-A-Day
    • 12.12.09
    • 20:58

    How does America back out of this mess? They didn't want this to happen.

  • 6. 0 0
    #3 John the American
    • *BEN JABO
    • 12.12.09
    • 18:40

    "Time and place of their choosing", that's the rub They'll continue to stall and delay until they're managed to complete their first nuke Don't hold your breath w aiting, never is a long time

  • 5. 0 0
    Iran plays the 'Western' game of politics -
    • Ronen
    • 12.12.09
    • 18:12

    - successfully. Use rhetoric. Do as I say, not as I do. Constantly change your position. And so forth...

  • 4. 0 0
    Another Farsi Farce
    • Harry
    • 12.12.09
    • 17:38

    This article omits several key details in the latest Iranian ruse. First they want the exchange to take place on Kish Island in the Persian Gulf which they own and they have not stated if the enriched uranium would stay on the island or leave it. Second, by dragging out the time table in stages they would still be left with enough uranium to build a nuclear weapon. I could see this latest Iranian "charm offensive" coming a mile away. It is the pattern they always employ. Just as things start to look tough for them they come up with a vague "proposal" to string the idiots along and buy more time. And of course The Supreme Schmegagie can always decide to nix the whole thing!

  • 3. 0 0
    Seems reasonable
    • John the American
    • 12.12.09
    • 15:57

    Can't blame Iran for wanting the exchange to be made at the same time and at a place of their choosing. The last time they sent it to France and to this day have not received it back.

  • 2. 0 0
    All you need is stall pa pa pa pa
    • Ahmajidajajaahja
    • 12.12.09
    • 15:27

  • 1. 0 0
    The Iranian fear
    • Joseph
    • 12.12.09
    • 14:55

    If Iran swaps its LEU for 20% enriched uranium in one time or in three times, simultaneously or not, the quantity of LEU remaining in Iran would be the same. So, if western countries do not accept the Iranian proposed deal, that means that they do not indent to send the 20% enriched uranium back to Iran.