U.S. House committee approves tighter Iran sanctions bill
State Dept. emphasizes commitment to engagement with Iran; World waits for Iran's response to nuclear draft deal.
By Associated Press Tags: Iran U.S. Iran nuclearA bill that would tighten U.S. sanctions against the export of refined petroleum products to Iran has been approved overwhelmingly by the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives.
Iran is a major exporter of crude oil but lacks sufficient refining facilities to supply its needs. The sanctions would bar gasoline, kerosene, propane and other refined products. The bill also would extend sanctions from 2011 to 2016.
Four members among the committee's 28 Democrats and 19 Republicans spoke out against the legislation, which passed by voice vote. The bill still must be voted on by the full House and clear the Senate before becoming law.
The Obama administration has withheld refined petroleum products from current sanctions to avoid harming everyday Iranians.
U.S. sanctions are meant to punish Iran for allegedly trying to develop nuclear arms.
The State Department was noncommittal in its reaction to the committee's vote.
Spokesman Ian Kelly said the department prefers a multilateral approach to the Iran problem, both through the International Atomic Energy Agency of the United Nations and the P-5-plus-1, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany.
"Right now, I think most of our energies are focused on the engagement side of it to follow up on the P-5-plus-1 meeting in Geneva and waiting for a response from Iran," Kelly said, "But all along, there's also the other track, the track of pressure, and we believe that that track has to be at least planned for while we pursue the engagement track."
Iran told the IAEA on Friday that it would have an answer this week to the suggestion that it ship much of its uranium to Russia for enrichment to levels too low for use in nuclear arms.
Kelly said Wednesday he had seen press reports that the response might come Thursday, but the Iranians have said nothing officially.
While expressing preference for a negotiated outcome, Kelly clearly was not dismayed by the new legislation's start toward enactment.
"We, of course, welcome the advice of Congress and are working with them as they go through their own deliberations on how to go forward in our relations with Iran," Kelly told reporters.
"We all share the same goal, and that's getting Iran to be more transparent about its nuclear energy program. And there's a lot of discussions on how best to get to that," he said.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
The bill still has other committees to clear, then the entire House. Then it has to clear about four committees in the Senate before the unlimited (forever) debate on the Senate floor. Then it would have to be voted out of the Senate. If all this happens, it then gets to go to reconciliation with the House, then back to both the House and Senate. Then to Obama for veto as an infringement on Executive powers of the Presidency. It takes a 2/3 vote of the House and the Senate both to override a veto. If a President doesn't like something, it doesn't happen too often. And the Congress taking on Executive branch powers rarely ever happens. The system was designed to be slow and deliberate.
zog zog zog zog zog zog......sanctions against Iran does nothing to improve the US...only helps the warmongers.
The only country of conquest that the US congress backs wholeheartedly with money, weaponery and loving rhettoric.....having these men in control of the free world is rather pathetic!........ PEACE EVER?