U.S. general: Iran efforts at nuclear bomb slowing down
Chinese FM says Beijing still seeks diplomatic solution to nuclear stand-off, after Germany calls for sanctions.
By Reuters Tags: China Iran sanctions Israel news Iran nuclearU.S. General David Petraeus said on Tuesday Iranian efforts to develop a nuclear weapon appear to have been delayed "a bit" and voiced confidence it would not have a bomb this year.
The comments by the head of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, underscored the Obama administration's message to Israel and Gulf allies -- that there is time to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program by imposing more economic sanctions.
U.S. President Barack Obama's top military advisers, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have been playing down the effectiveness of using military force against Iran.
"It has, thankfully, slid to the right a bit and it is not this calendar year, I don't think," Petraeus told a Senate panel when asked when Iran would have a nuclear weapon.
Iran denies it is seeking to build nuclear weapons.
Petraeus said while Obama had "explicitly stated that he has not taken the military option off the table," the administration's focus was on using different types of sanctions to get Tehran to change its behavior.
Petraeus has acknowledged that contingency planning was under way should Obama decide on military action but declined to discuss details during the open Senate hearing.
Last month, the U.S. director of national intelligence, Dennis Blair, said Iranian advancements in enriching uranium and other areas showed the government was "technically capable" of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the "next few years, if it chooses to do so."
Blair cited information published by the International Atomic Energy Agency showing that the number of centrifuges installed at Iran's enrichment plant at Natanz had grown to more than 8,000 from about 3,000 in late 2007.
But he said Iran appeared to be "experiencing some problems" at Natanz and was operating only about half of the installed centrifuges, constraining its overall ability to produce larger quantities of low-enriched uranium.
It was not immediately clear if Petraeus was referring to those problems.
While the nuclear program may have been slowed, Iran continues to expand the scale, reach and sophistication of its ballistic missile forces, U.S. intelligence officials say.
To counter that threat, the United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems in and around the Gulf. Petraeus said this "regional security architecture" included a network of shared early warning systems and ballistic missile defenses.
Some lawmakers point to signs that the Obama administration is moving to a containment strategy, rather than one aimed at denying Iran a nuclear weapon.
Petraeus declined to comment on what he termed a "big policy hypothetical."
He said current U.S. policy was "very clear" in that "the president has said that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons."
China 'more concerned' over Iran, but wary of sanctions
Meanwhile, the Chinese foreign minister said earlier Tuesday that China has become more concerned about international tensions over Iran's nuclear program, but remains doubtful that sanctions can resolve the stand-off.
Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi was speaking after talks with visiting British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, where one of the key issues on the table was Iran.
Yang's comments suggested that he had given little ground on Western calls that Beijing back proposed new sanctions over Tehran's disputed nuclear activities, which China could block as a veto-wielding permanent member of the UN Security Council.
"Regarding the Iran nuclear issue, I wish to point out that this issue is the subject of widespread attention in the international community," Yang told reporters.
"China has become more concerned about the current situation," he said, adding that Beijing was still seeking a diplomatic solution.
Western powers say Iran wants the means to make nuclear weapons and has violated non-proliferation safeguards. German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Monday that the time had come for new sanctions.
Iran says its uranium enrichment activities are to make fuel for planned nuclear power plants.
China has resisted calls to tighten the economic screws on one of its major suppliers of oil, and Yang repeated Beijing's long-standing position that sanctions could not resolve the tensions. But he stopped short of outright opposition.
"I have said before that sanctions do not provide a fundamental solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, ultimately this issue has to be resolved through peaceful negotiations," he said.
"We will continue to make active efforts to bring about a diplomatic solution to the Iran nuclear issue."
A draft Western proposal calls for restricting more Iranian banks abroad, but does not press for sanctions against Iran's oil and gas industries.
At the news briefing, Miliband described tackling Iran's nuclear program as a "test for all of us" and noted that China had registered its increasing concern.
"We have a shared goal in ensuring that Iran lives by its commitments under the non-proliferation treaty, and we are going to work very closely together to achieve it," he added.
China is one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, each holding the power to veto resolutions. It backed previous Iran resolutions, after working to cut measures that could threaten flows of oil and Chinese investments.
In 2009, Iran was China's third biggest source of imported crude oil, behind Angola and top supplier Saudi Arabia. Iran supplied China with 23.1 million metric tons of crude, or 11.4 percent of China's total crude imports.
While Beijing abstains from Security Council votes on decisions it dislikes, it is much less willing to use its veto and risk diplomatic isolation, especially if fellow Security Council member Russia backs a resolution.
|
China FM Yang Jiechi. |
| Photo by: (Reuters) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Iran wants two things:To start a war to bring back their "messiah" while they blot Israel off the map at the same time. They don't want to be perceived as agressors, but as hero's to the other muslim nations. Yes,Q, they would like Israel to be the agressor so they could scream HELP and lay blame.
Nothing we perceive from China, the US or Iran is to be believed. 2 of them are preparing for a war and the other is in readiness to react to their advantage. Israel is under Divine protection. So let the chips fall where they may!
Probably because Iran can see the beginning Israel's 'implosion,' caused by none other than the present Israeli government.
Surely Israel has lost any vestiges of credibility in the International area. It is high time Israel opted for peace instead of "peace gestures" and fake moves. The only way to relieve pressure from Iran is to give the occupied territories back, set borders along the 1976 lines, and recognize the Palestinians' right of return IN PRINCIPLE that includes compensating them.
Vice President Biden went to Israel to talk about Iran, when the United States was insulted by Israeli settlement announcements. Now, U.S. General David Petraeus has delivered the US response to Israel's insults. Message to Israel: You ask us for help with Iran, while insulting the United States at the same time? Forget it. Request denied. The true repercussions of this continued campaign of insults towards the Office of the United States President, is that Israel simply won't get things they want from the US. No fan-fare. No big speeches. Just Israel not getting what they want done in a nice quiet way. Just like this.
Why is general Petraeus ignoring the danger in Israel's bomb? Could it be cowardice? Careerism? Or is it a double standard?
would be the hypcritical Zionazis at Haaretz, anybody would support it. Yaki-tori à la Israel, quel delice!
Further alienate you from your neighbors? Do you not see how the persistent subjugation of millions of Palestinians is already doing this? That there will never be peace with your neighbors without the establishment of a Palestinian state in the west bank and gaza. Israel's arrogance is what is isolatin Israel in the region and the world - not Iran's actions. Egypt's leaders will fall and new younger leadership will take power, the house of Saud will fall as well - add nukes to the pic and this conflict cannot be sustained peacefully. Make peace.
The reality is that Iran is more of an Israeli concern than an american one - Israel can do as it will but it cannot then try to dictate what the US or the international community should do with Iran - hence, it is failing. Without the go ahead from the US it cannot bomb Iran - in addition, this would put our soldiers in mortal danger - which the US military industrial complex would not take kindly to. The fact of the matter is that most diplomats may not want to admit it but believe that Iran WILL get nukes and nothing will happen - perhaps Israel will become less beligerant towards its neighbors when the threat of a nuclear Syrian war can loom high!
It seems the Obama administration will do ANYTHING in order to shirk its responsibility vis-a-vis Iran, even lying. It's already bad enough for Obama to prevent Israel from defending itself from being nuked by the Iranians and/or its proxies. NOw Obama won't even impose significant sanctions against Iran.Israel now faces Iran, its proxies (Syria, hamas and hizbollah) and an inept and naive Obama administration which has no clue and experiments with foreign relations at the expence of Israel's national security.The latest crisis underscores the fact that Obama doesn't dare even to blame the pals for imposing pre-conditions for peace talks with Israel or even for condemning the PA for wanting to name one of Ramallah's squares after a suicide bomber who killed 35 Israeli civilians.This stupidity on the part of Obama only encourages extremists in the pal/arab side and pushes Netanyahu with his back against the wall.If this continues, Bibi might simply have nothing to lose and attack Iran.
The man is well respected as a leader and great general,but he's dreaming. The iranians already have all the WMDs they need and have also the means of delivery...They will not nuke Israel with a big one,because it would slaughter many 'pals',but they can use miniatures and give them to the syrians,to hizballah and to hamas
By the time Iran has any semblance of a bomb their administration will probably be gone. In any event, our area inhabitants are gearing more towards trade than war which is the smart thing. Our own pathetic administration is hell bent to drop something on Iran, knowing full well that that is what they want in order to swing the pendulum away from them and further alienate us from our neighbors.
End Israel's nuclear weapons hypocrisy!
no sens .the question is what us will do if suddenly iran detonate it first nuke?
-ws on finished product.
Everyone knows of the US and Israeli nuclear arsenals. As crazy as the Iranian leadership is, it will not sacrifice it's country to attack Israel. Everyone knows, including the Iranians, that a nuclear attack on Israel would receive and immediate deadly nuclear response. No one wants this. Let Iran produce the bomb, it will balance the power in the middle east and it will actually create less fighting. Nuclear powers do not attack one another.
that iran was not pursuing a bomb-iran is speeding up its bomb development. In aweek a new reportr will cime out that an iranian bomb is on its way whast happened to responsible journalism?
It seems Mr. Yang avoids to remind himslf that sanctions are part of a diplomatic aproach to the subject. No one stops him from convincing the IRI just by talking to them but Tehran defied the world before and after sanctions and is not very likely to change its mind, if someone says "please". So all there is to say is: PLease Mr. Yang surprise us - or act accordingly if you can't.