• Published 08:28 19.12.09
  • Latest update 12:03 19.12.09

Sudan delegate compares U.S.-led climate proposal to Holocaust

Objectors argue emission-reduction plan worked out by U.S., China, India, S. Africa and Brazil was too lax.

By Reuters

United Nations climate talks fell into crisis on Saturday after some developing nations angrily rejected a plan worked out by U.S. President Barack Obama and leaders of other major economies for fighting global warming.

An acrimonious session long past midnight hit a low point when a Sudanese delegate said the plan in Africa would be like the Holocaust by causing more deadly floods, droughts, mudslides, sandstorms and rising seas.

Copenhagen, meant to be the climax of two years of negotiations, risked ending with no firm UN accords despite a summit of 120 world leaders on Friday who tried to work out the first climate blueprint since the UN's 1997 Kyoto Protocol.

The Sudanese official, Lumumba Stanislas Dia-ping, who chairs the Group of 77 and China bloc of 130 poor nations, said the pact was "a solution based on values, the very same values in our opinion that funnelled six million people in Europe into furnaces."

Dia-ping is known for strong statements and declared the draft deal the worst in the history of climate negotiations.

The draft "asked Africa to sign a suicide pact, an incineration pact, in order to maintain the economic dominance of a few countries," he said.

Countries including Venezuela, Sudan and Tuvalu said they opposed a deal spearheaded on Friday in Copenhagen by the United States, China, India, South Africa and Brazil at the summit. The deal would need unanimous backing to be adopted.

Opponents said the document, which sets a target of limiting global warming to a maximum 2 degree Celsius rise over pre-industrial times and holds out the prospect of $100 billion in annual aid from 2020 for developing nations, was too weak.

The document "is a solution based on the same very values, in our opinion, that channeled six million people in Europe into furnaces," said Sudan's Lumumba Stanislaus Di-aping.

"The reference to the Holocaust is, in this context, absolutely despicable," said Anders Turesson, chief negotiator of Sweden.

"This institution faces a moment of profound crisis at this meeting," British Environment Minister Ed Miliband said. He urged delegates to accept the plan, which he said would improve the lives of millions.

Other nations including European Union states, Japan, a representative of the African Union and the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) urged delegates to adopt the plan as a UN blueprint for action to combat climate change.

"AOSIS stands by the document, we stand by the process," said Dessima Williams, chair of AOSIS. "It was not perfect, there were and still are things in it that we would not want."

"We have a real danger of [UN climate] talks going the same way as WTO [trade] talks and other multilateral talks," Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed said, urging delegates to back the plan to prevent the process dragging on for years.

For any deal to become a UN pact it needs to be adopted unanimously. The talks ultimately avoided failure by formally acknowledging a new accord for combating global warming despite the vocal opposition.

"The conference of the parties takes note of the Copenhagen Accord," said a final decision at the 193-nation talks that stopped short of endorsing the deal.

This means that the deal was adopted as a less binding document listing who supported it and who objected, with the supporters representing far more than half the world's greenhouse gas emissions.

Many nations said the deal fell far short of UN ambitions for Copenhagen, meant as a turning point to push the world economy towards renewable energies such as hydro, solar and wind power and away from fossil fuels.

Before leaving, Obama said the deal was a starting point. "This progress did not come easily and we know this progress alone is not enough," he said after talks with China's Premier Wen Jiabao and leaders of India, South Africa and Brazil.

"We've come a long way but we have much further to go," he said of the deal.

"The meeting has had a positive result, everyone should be happy," said Xie Zhenhua, head of China's climate delegation.

European nations were lukewarm to a deal that cut out some goals mentioned previously in draft texts, such as a target of halving world greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

"The decision has been very difficult for me. We have done one step, we have hoped for several more," said German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd called the deal "a significant agreement on climate change action. It is the first global agreement on climate change action between rich nations and poor countries."

Many European nations want Obama to offer deeper U.S. cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. But Obama was unable to, partly because carbon capping legislation is stalled in the U.S. Senate. Washington backed a plan to raise $100 billion in aid for poor nations from 2020.

The deal sets an end-January 2010 deadline for all nations to submit plans for curbs on emissions to the United Nations. A separate text proposes an end-2010 deadline for reporting back on - but dropped a plan to insist on a legally binding treaty.

Some environmental groups were also scathing.

"The city of Copenhagen is a crime scene tonight, with the guilty men and women fleeing to the airport," said John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace U.K.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 11. 0 0
  • 10. 0 0
    #1
    • Bibi
    • 19.12.09
    • 14:47

    Do youthink that africa ir african casued global worming. This is ignorance and yes it is value system that lead to the holocast. Now afria can do nothing, they Industrial countries then have to doubel their Cota of cutting green house gaze and they have to cut their indiustrial output. that mean cut their GDP and power. That why they need to the little people becasue then they can cut smaller portion of their output. If I amafrica, Iwill say. No we will start burning coal and the hill witht eh world. why we want to live in a world that is want to survive on the backs of poor nations. Do you understand the problem now. ?

  • 9. 0 0
    Yes, we have no bananas.
    • Stephen.
    • 19.12.09
    • 12:57

    The problem lies with the US and China. 100 billion dollars will not take away the problem. Neither will a trillion virtual dollars. For the real loser is Africa. They are the true sufferers. The Copenhagen party, was only that. One big get together, led by those that are guilty of the most heinous crimes against the planet earth. They just offered cash. When the glaciers of Greenland are melted away, so will all the coastal regions of the planet be underwater. My guess its far too late, rather humanity must now think in terms of coastal protection. Get the Dutch on board ASAP before Holland disappears. The UK is investing millions on a Thames barrier. At least they have seen the big picture. Meanwhile the scientists and oil companies argue. Good day from freezing Swiss Alps.

  • 8. 0 0
    The curse of being world leader; fantastic orator; and no money.
    • S
    • 19.12.09
    • 11:56

    One African said something like "he's the same with Bush, but one of them at least told it as it is...". Not to speak of what Chavez (an even better orator) said - "still smelling sulfur..." In short, a sad period in America's history.

  • 7. 0 0
    # 1
    • Sarah
    • 19.12.09
    • 11:54

    It's THEM who are paying a high price for YOUR ignorance already! Africa is responsible for less than 3,5% of the global emissions but suffers most from the impacts of global warming. The US was by far the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases for decades and produces today twice as much CO2 per capita than the EU-nations while having the same living standard. The US has to stop living on the cost of the rest of the world and take over responsibility for it's actions.

  • 6. 0 0
    A Case Study in "Drive by Diplomacy"
    • JayC
    • 19.12.09
    • 11:45

    After 2 weeks up bickering, posturing and adolescent behavior..After watching the "premier" climate change conference turn into something that looked like it was organized by the UN (Oh wait! This WAS organized by the UN!)...After watching "developing countries" run around with palms out, looking for money from the "imperialists"...After watching China seriously attempt to position itself as a developing country, along the lines of Tahiti..Obama: 1. Swoops in..2. Blames everybody..3.Crashes a couple of meetings...and 4.Calls a press conference to declare victory (where's that "Mission Accomplished!" sign, when you need it?)...For any student who's a Poly-Sci major; take note. "Obama's day in Copenhagen" will come to be a 'case study' in "Drive by diplomacy"...Chavez complained about the "smell of sulfur".Sorry Hugo. What you were sniffing was jet fuel from Air Force One. Maybe the Prez had to rush back & "sell" the Senate on "global warming" during a 2 ft snow storm in mid-December-DC!

  • 5. 0 0
    Sudanese 'officials'..
    • Philip
    • 19.12.09
    • 10:56

    ..certainly know all about holocuasts. I agree with the first poster. It's time to stop the handouts to African dictators.

  • 4. 0 0
    Mazhu pee chu
    • Green mama
    • 19.12.09
    • 10:51

    Well can you imagine what they will do with out all this Bla bla bla? How they will Justifies all the wind and falshe storms they are creating? Change them instead of the climate change. Let PPL decide. Like #1 say. Don't force on the weak. David Broza can help, Prozak too. I an shocked of the use of the 6 Ml.

  • 3. 0 0
    # Petra
    • Sarah
    • 19.12.09
    • 10:38

    Petra, why should the African nations pay for the problems the USA caused in the first place?? US emissions have been by FAR the highest for decades and per capita they are still! Why has an American the "right" to emit more than twice as much CO2 than an EU-citizen ?? We're having the same living standard here, in many aspects even higher!! Africa is responsible for less than 3,5% of the global emissions but suffers the most from the impacts of global warming. Why should THEY pay for YOUR mistakes?? Just because it has always been like that??

  • 2. 0 0
    The curse of being world leader, fantastic orator, and no money..
    • S
    • 19.12.09
    • 10:31

    One African said something like "he's the same with Bush, but one of them at least told it as it is...". Not to speak of what Chavez (an even better orator) said - "still smelling sulfur..." In short, a sad period in America's history.

  • 1. 0 0
    Why do we have to pay for their ignorance?
    • Petra
    • 19.12.09
    • 10:04

    giving 100 bill to African nations is like financing a hookers convention w. drugs and limos. time to grow up, act like adults and find a solution for each nation ON THEIR OWN!