• Published 00:00 25.07.05
  • Latest update 00:00 25.07.05

Sharon slams London mayor's 'ignorance' on Hamas and Likud

Mayor Ken Livingstone called Likud, Hamas 'two sides of same coin'; PM: 'basic misunderstanding of reality.'

By Haaretz Service

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has criticized London Mayor Ken Livingstone for "ignorance" in having declared that members of the Likud and Hamas were "two sides of the same coin."

Livingstone enraged Israelis last week by defending the use of suicide bombers in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and charging that Israel had indiscriminately slaughtered Palestinians in acts that "border on crimes against humanity."

Speaking to Sky News in an interview, Livingstone also said that he does not distinguish between members of Likud and Hamas. "I think it is the Israelis who are leading the stubborn line," he said. "The Likud and Hamas members are two sides of the same coin. They need each other in order to attract support."

"Each side emphasizes the extremism of the other in order to attract sympathy," Livingstone said.

Sharon, speaking to party activists in the northern city of Afula Sunday night, took Livingstone to task for the mayor's depiction of the Likud.

"Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis," Sharon said in remarks broadcast Monday on Israel Radio.

"The comparison drawn by the mayor of London was grave and inappropriate," Sharon said. "It indicates ignorance and a basic misunderstanding of reality."

Livingstone's comments came less than two weeks since the first wave of London bombings. More than 50 people died in four London blasts on underground trains and a bus. The bombings were believed to have been carried out by suicide terrorists.

"Given that the Palestinians don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons," Livingstone told Sky News in an interview.

"In an unfair balance, that's what people use," said Livingstone, who has often been strongly critical of Israel in the past.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 404. 0 0
    Seriously, now
    • JJ Doyle
    • 28.07.05
    • 06:44

    Likud is a political party,which contests in free and fair local elections, against a broad array of rivals. When Likud loses popular support, it steps aside. Hamas is a self-appointed armed group, financially dependant upon foreign sources. Locals have no say. Hamas does not imagine an alternation of power with anyone. Hamas' goal is a totalitarian dictatorship. What Likud and Hamas have in common: both are comprised of populations that were displaced by the military adventures of Arab nationalists, Nasser in particular.

  • 403. 0 0
    #52 - oleh hadash
    • peanutjones
    • 28.07.05
    • 02:32

    i dearly hope that you are not a representative of your nation. You are the barbaric one in suggesting taht ANYONE dies at the hands of terrorists. You have disgraced Israel

  • 402. 0 0
    Livingstone --- Tombstone
    • Joshua Salik
    • 28.07.05
    • 01:12

    He, his city, and his country can go to hell as far as I am concerned.

  • 401. 0 0
    #357 as ignorant of history as Livingstone
    • Jay
    • 27.07.05
    • 20:42

    One reason why Ferenzi doesn't understand "all these insults against Ken Livingstone" is that he is as ignorant of history as the Lord Mayor. He also doesn't seem to note the hypocracy of being against terror when it happens in London, but completely understanding of it when it happens in Israel. As to history, for example: "What are the alternatives that have been given to the Palestinians for 45 years?" Duh, how about PEACE!! What about Oslo and Barak's plan, which would have given the Palestinians all of Gaza and virtually all of the West Bank? Of course, every time that there has been serious progress towards peace, the terrorists go into overdrive because they have no interest in peace; they want to exterminate Israel. Israel has continuously shown that when an enemy is seriously interested in making peace, they will make peace (ask the Egyptians and Jordanians). So don't give us this garbage about no alternative! Or "Who ordered the genocide in Sabra and Chattila?" Actually, it was the (Lebanese Christian) Falange militia. Since Ferenzi has no clue what happened... This was during the chaos of Israel's 1982 incursion in Lebanon to stop terrorist attacks against Israel. The recently elected (by parliament) Lebanese President, Bashir Gemayel, was assassinated, and it was widely believed that Palestinians were responsible (as they had reason to get revenge against Bashir, himself a rather brutal thug). Bashir's supporters (his father had founded the Falange Party and militia) were out to get revenge. They took advantage of the situation on the ground; very soon after the Israelis swept through the area around Sabra and Chattila, chasing the Palestinian militias, the Falange militia went into the camp and committed the atrocity. No Israeli was involved. In fact, Ariel Sharon, who was deemed "indirectly responsible" because his troops had not stopped the Falangists from entering the camp, was the only one ever punished for Sabra and Chattila. The leaders of the massacre, Samir Geagea and Elie Hobeika, never were. In fact, Hobeika became a minister in the Lebanese government, and nobody complained. Incidentally, during the Lebanese Civil War, in 1975-1990, there were several massacres even larger than Sabra and Chattila, including one by the same Falange militia of Palestinians. Sabra and Chattila however was the only one where there was a way to blame Israel...

  • 400. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • Gad Giladi
    • 27.07.05
    • 09:46

    Contrary to many readers, I don't think KL's declarations are motivated by antisemitism or by communist ideology. Ken seems to be a relatively successful mayor of one of the major capital cities in the occidental capitalistic system. However, being of socialist tendencies, KL has a natural reaction of disgust and abhorrence of the acts of the Government of Israel. He isn't alone. Most civilized human beings reject outright any oppression of other human beings. ..Even when the oppressors are Jews! The real problem is the ignorance reflected in his declarations and probably the potential danger receled in them. Legitimizing suicide bombers (under the pretext that that is the only recourse they have against the occupying forces - they were just as occupying, oppressing and human rights' violating under Labor led governments!)only opens the way to the same discourse and apologetics for suicide bombers and terrorists all over the World, including the city of London! Maybe KL should take a long break from making idiotic declarations and spend that time studying and widening his narrow horizons. Thank-God for Tony Blair rebuking KL's statements in a very clear and open declaration that there is and can be no justification for terrorism and suicide bombing, no matter where and no matter under what circumstances.

  • 399. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • Cipora Kohn
    • 27.07.05
    • 01:22

    Livingstone is fueled by Communist ideology as it was practiced in the former Soviet states and their ideology, as well as by their propaganda. It may be alittle known fact that after Worl War ll, anti-semitism was officially banned by Communist regimes. But, anti-semitism was simply replaced with anti-Zionism. Many Jews, including party member were tortured and murdered in the name of this ideology, including the Hungarian Jewish athlete who had won the gold medal in the 1936 Olympics in Berlin. Many prominent Jews were accused of Zionism, but in fact they were murdered because they were Jewish.

  • 398. 0 0
    Tough sell
    • JJ Doyle
    • 26.07.05
    • 23:22

    Livingsotne is selling the concept, that it's okay for Leeds Pakistanis to kill Brits, so long as they are aiming only for the Jews and doing it on behalf of the Arabs. I wouldn't want to try to sell this dead dog.

  • 397. 0 0
    Sharon slams London mayor
    • Richard Braun
    • 26.07.05
    • 21:32

    Sharon was only expressing what any thoughtful human being would say about that dismal product of a land that produced the 'Jew of Malta,' Shylock from 'The Mechant of Venice,' Dicken's Fagan, just some of the insidious caricatures of Jews the English celebrate.

  • 396. 0 0
    It's anti-semitic if...
    • JJ Doyle
    • 26.07.05
    • 21:20

    There are two types of anti-semitic rhetoric in play in the Arab-Israeli conflict. First, is recognizable by its asymmetry: the Jews owe human consideration to the Arabs, the Arabs do not owe human consideraation to the Jews. The second type, draws from the established anti-semitic canon: AIPAC=the Elders of Zion. Livingstone is partial to the first kind. I haven't heard him say that America is ruled by the Jews, and that "real America" admires Yasser Arafat or Osama Bin Laden. Arguments of these two types still resonate in Europe. That is one of the reasons that the Arabs deploy them. In mulitcultural America, we recognize them for what they are.

  • 395. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • j
    • 26.07.05
    • 20:42

    What a mouth on a man in public office!!! Maybe he should run for mayor of the "new" Hamas community in Gaza, on ISRAELI land. He should read his history books - Chamberlain found out that appeasement doesn't work, not by conceding land as we are being forced to do, or by the kind of anti-semitic garbage Livingstone seems to spew every time he opens his mouth, for which he no doubt gets Brownie points from the Arab world. The world is struggling to hold a steady course. We do NOT need people like Livingstone who choose to cause unrest instead of using the same energy to try diplomacy to ease the situation - I don't believe he knows what the word means. Send him to Gaza - he does not belong in the company of decent people. That should be an appropriate milieu for him. EVERYONE there would probably hang on his every word. He has proved, all by himself, that anti-semitism is as rife as it ever was.

  • 394. 0 0
    Ken is no surprise
    • Yonathan Esysler
    • 26.07.05
    • 18:10

    Ken is a total moron, he runs the most succesful city in Europe and he got Lady Thatcher to thank. How does that make Ken feel going to sleep. What a populist, as a European, one can only feel sadness for our representatives.

  • 393. 0 0
    Exactly!Leeches on USA taxpayers
    • frank
    • 26.07.05
    • 17:21

    Boy,you hit the nail on the head.Why are the US taxpayers constantly asked to foot the bill as they are nowasked to give 2.2 billion to Israel to resettle the settlers and redeploy the IDF?We told them from the beginning we were against them building the settlements as an obstacle to peace,now they have the nerve to ask us to pay to have them removed and resettle everyone.This has been going on for too long.Israel should pay for this themselves,the US taxpayers are not responsible to support financial Israeli adventures.We need our US citizens to WAKE UP to the scam that the Isralei's are pulling over on the American taxpayers with the help of American Jews buying off our politicians.We need to let our politicians know this has to stop or vote them out of office.There are many traitors in our midst and unfortunatly many are in USA Congress.

  • 392. 0 0
    i agree
    • shlomo stern
    • 26.07.05
    • 16:05

    I agree with the london prime minister look what sharon is doing in gush katif,

  • 391. 0 0
    The truth hurts
    • David
    • 26.07.05
    • 15:29

    Perhaps the reason mr sharon is so excited is that Ken livingstone is speaking the truth. Likud is an extremist movement..........just like Hamas...perhaps Hamas are more honest about it.

  • 390. 0 0
    muslim brit
    • mike
    • 26.07.05
    • 15:17

    London's mayor is an idiot. Soon or latter his country will be Great Britain of Islam anyway

  • 389. 0 0
    #373 Ronnie Wolman
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:45

    Hi Ronnie, I empathise with you: the same happened to me last night, and it got quite nasty (you can see for yourself, if you're interested). It's not easy having a critical mindset on Talkback, Yair

  • 388. 0 0
    Chafeeka #366 Post Script
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:43

    One last comment though about something I didn't like about your message. You wrote that: "Because you stayed with an arab family and you had a wonderful experience, doesnt mean that that one family represents the majority of Palestinians" If you'd read my message more meticulously (I recommend #270), you would see that my experiences with Arabs have been far more profound that that. I'm an Arabic Jew for starters, and have spent a lot of time in the muslim world, surrounded purely by muslims, while never hiding my identity. In the light of that, "Because you stayed with an Arab family" sounds a bit denigrating. Because of the tone of the rest of your message, though, I assume it wasn't meant that way. A still-grateful Yair

  • 387. 0 0
    Paul Harris #298
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:38

    If you think I've not had any personal experiences, as you state, you should read my messages again (particularly #270): I can't understand how you got to this conclusion, unless you make an effort to only see what you want. On a more general note: some of your remarks last night I found personally offensive, and I told you that it had affected me quite a lot. I still don't understand your totally cold reaction to that. I would personally care. Anyway, it's a shame to show no empathy while communicating. I hope (for you) that you're not like that in real life. Yair PS I'm already prepared for a similarly cold and offensive reply, don't worry.

  • 386. 0 0
    The Mayor of London's Remarks; Sharon's Response
    • Jack Kay
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:35

    Let's call a spade a spade. Sharon is dead wrong to call the London mayor "ignorant". Sharon and the rest of us know that anti-Semitism is rampant in the upper circles of British society. Livingstone's remarks are that and nothing more. "The thing speaks for itself", and the man is a pig.

  • 385. 0 0
    Proud Zionist #290
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:28

    Of course PZ, We Jews are all angels. We've never committed a crime. The (grand)parents of my Palestinian friends left their houses because they wanted to see other parts of the world. Extended tourism, let's call it. The refugee camp is like a Buddhist experience of strengthening stoicism. By the way, on their way out they were whistling and dropped by a cinema to watch a movie, while eating popcorn. I'm so impressed by your critical attitude. It's not worrying at all... And it certainly does not resemble any extreme right-wing ideologies. It seems we Jews have learnt from the experience, as we now unanimously condemn nationalism. I agree with you, we should all believe what we're being told by our countrymen (instead of our opponents), because their version is SOOO objective. An impressed Jew

  • 384. 0 0
    Tity #470
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:18

    Dear Tity, Thanks for your support! Last night things got a bit difficult, even personal, and I have to admit it affected me quite a bit. Not anymore though. Don't worry, everything is back to normal... Great to know that some people think in the same way. Speak to you soon, Yair PS I'm sending you a mail today.

  • 383. 0 0
    Chafeeka #366
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:13

    Hi Chafeeka, Thank you for your very reasonable and intellectually stimulating message. I think you're totally right... I apologise if I've seemingly been engaging in Israel-bashing. I'm not anti-Israeli in any way, I just strongly oppose some of its policies. I'm making Aliyah in November, so that should indicate enough about my feelings towards the country... The totally uncritical stance of many people on this forum, though, really gets to me. It's like: my country is right, everybody else is wrong. There's no way of getting them to see even the tiniest nuances, it's a foregone conclusion: the Arabs are to blame. Now, I have much criticism on certain aspects of the Palestinian resistance as well, particularly in terms of its violence. However, venting that here is useless: we all agree. I try to incorporate certain balancing remarks into my messages, but I don't see the point in focusing on something about which broad consensus exists. You have shown me a new side of the argument though, which makes me understand the sensitivities a bit better... Thanks again, A grateful Yair

  • 382. 0 0
    Mbrandi #344
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:02

    "you did say you were embarrassed" Good point! I had to think about that one... Yes, it's not so much guilt. Actually, I feel zero guilty because I know I'm acting against what I see as repression. It's more embarrassment... The image that Israel is getting (whether justified or not) is changing perceptions about Jews everywhere. I know that if I weren't Jewish I would certainly not be impressed by Israeli-style policies, so I kind of get their point... It's embarrassing in the sense that I don't want people to assume that me, my family and my friends are like that. The embarrassment is only secondary though. It's more a question of principles and justice. Anyway, gotta go back to work, Yair PS I like people challenging me with good arguments. Please continue! ;)

  • 381. 0 0
    livingstone should be deported
    • daniel yefet
    • 26.07.05
    • 14:02

    ken livingstone is an evil purveyor of vile hatred against both jews and the state of israel since he came to power.. this putrid little man should be forcibly removed from office and imprisoned for his ugly and disgusting views... OR BETTER STILL DEPORTED TO HIS ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST PALS IN ARABIA... FORTHWITH.....

  • 380. 0 0
    To Tulip
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 13:55

    Hi Tulip, With "boredom" I was referring to the amount of hours that I spent on studying one tiny area of academic knowledge for my PhD. I got really bored in the end! Imagine having to write 420 pages on one topic... Anyway, yes, I know a few people in Jerusalem already, and I'm sure that on campus I'll meet many more. Israelis are so sociable that I have no worries about that issue. How is your physical condition now? I mean, I was a bit worried about what you said about your heart... Ik geef je mijn email adres hierbij... Als je-weet-wel-wie me hatemail gaat schrijven delete ik het wel weg! ;) aharonbarna@yahoo.es OK gotta goooo! Work is calling!

  • 379. 0 0
    Thank you Ben Alofs in response to Paul Harris
    • Marlene Paula
    • 26.07.05
    • 13:42

    Interesting how Paul Harris states a war criminal has to be convicted after a trial just like any other criminal, but Israel decides who is a criminal by assassinating Palestinians without giving them due process of law to know if they are innocent or guilty of any crime or detains some of them for years without charges. The fact is that Ariel Sharon is a war criminal cleared only by his own country as having indirect responsibility, which is not saying too much since Israel is very easygoing on all its criminals provided they are of the "proper" religious background.

  • 378. 0 0
    stephen murray
    • Londoner
    • 26.07.05
    • 13:01

    Mr Murray, just hold your horses , Your hysterical rant about Likud is way off the mark. Every action taken by the IDF is specifically a response to a terror act committed against inncocent Israeli citizens . Israel has never , I repeat never directly aimed a military action against innocent Palestinian citizens. You may or may not agree with the politics of Likud but one suspects such a uncontrolled rant to have ulterior motives.

  • 377. 0 0
    aprés les déclarations du Dr Livingstone
    • londoner
    • 26.07.05
    • 12:47

    Monsieur, tout d'abords Je crois que Ken Livingstone n'a pas un doctorat. Il est simplement monsieur Red Ken de la maison de Trotsky. Felicitaions de Londre a Boulogne sur mer

  • 376. 0 0
    Occupied Northern Ireland
    • American
    • 26.07.05
    • 12:47

    I agree with you that at some times, most countries were occupiers and most countries should examine their own histories before they come down on others. But you also need to brush up on your American History. Texas was won in a war between the residents of Texas (who were living under Mexican rule), mostly fought by the Texas Rangers (which I believe were not part of the Federal Army) and the Gov't of Mexico and thereafter became an independent country. The Tejanos, or Mexican descendents living in Texas at the time also wanted to separate from Mexico, which was even more corrupt then then it is now. Later Texas was voted in as a state by the popular vote of the people. Texas is the only US State that was it's own country and was never a territory of the United States. It nearly didn't join the Union. California, Arizona, New Mexico etc were bought by the US Federal Gov't from Mexico, became territories,and then by popular vote, became states. Actually, Spain/Mexico were the occupiers of what we now know as the Southwestern and Western States (Spain), not the United States. Most of the US was bought with hard currency from the original "occupiers", Spain and France (Louisiana Purchase).

  • 375. 0 0
    #365 BM
    • Dutch
    • 26.07.05
    • 12:05

    BM Who are you to point a finger at Johanes? You make dreadful racist statements about the Palestinians too. Dutch

  • 374. 0 0
    aprés les déclarations du Dr Livingstone
    • péhourticq
    • 26.07.05
    • 11:51

    bonjour, j'ai lu dans la presse britannique(Mail,Guardian,Telegraph,etc...)les différentes déclarations faites par le maire de Londres.C'est un homme de médias qui aime bien se montrer.Ensuite, il ambitionne de succéder à Tony Blair à la tête du Labour...C'est un aparatchyk du parti trés à gauche. Mais voilà comment " l'anti-sionisme du début devient le nouveau visage de l'anti-séministme". S'agissant des critiques adressées à Israel ou aux israeliens. En Israel, on accepte les critiques au cours de discussions très animées à condition de savoir de quoi on parle(lorsque l'on est étranger) et d'apporter des arguments sur le pays,la vie de ses habitants, des institutions d'Israel et d'y aller régulièrement.Allez -y, vous verrez, les israeliens aiment discuter, mais ils n'aiment pas les remarques gratuites comme on pourrait les faire à des enfants "fais pas ça, fait ceci...)c'est ce que l'opinion internationale a tenté de faire, à commencer par l'union européenne.Mais cela, n'a jamais marché.

  • 373. 0 0
    Getting sidetracked yesterday
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 26.07.05
    • 11:44

    It was my fault. In the discussion between PZ and Yaakov I put my big mouth into the situation. Its funny,but I cannot stand the arrogance of many of these right wingers,their tone. Most cannot simply state their case,without ridicule.Proud Zionist is rude. Sarah is from Somewhere,not Nowhere. Yaakov has a mindset about Israel. I think anyone who states one side case only is fighting for that side only and not truth.He is guilty of the same type of perception as that of PZ. Loyalty to their worldviews. I didnt mean to jump in on that except to get upset at the language PZ uses which I think borders on 'personal attacks'. I search for truth and will continue to do so. And apart from the sidetracking that human emotions will throw me into,hope to continue.Its tough enough to get through myopic rhetoric but then to get see personal attacks throws me of my own route. Anyway,I continue the fight. Regarding Hamas I hope to see the end of my interrogation about why I said they should keep their weapons while they were part of the political spectrum,that would constitute a choice and they blew it. Still of course lots goes on behind the scenes and although we make decisions based on the known,we cannot know what transpires between the parties themselves.This is not about Hamas and the gun,it is about the real deals being brokered all around behind the political scenes.The fact that Hamas used the gun,and condoned Jihad may not be the disaster that I thought it was,its possible more is going on under the surface and that could mean in a myriad of ways.Still I stand by what I said and the pseudo (because it is here) strategy I suggested. I will however try to evade any personal attacks and read the content more,and hope that Haaretz will do something about some of these comments too.

  • 372. 0 0
    Ferenzi.Do you have a problem with the billions going to Egypt etc.
    • Peter S.M.
    • 26.07.05
    • 11:07

    Obviously not worth a mentionj I would love to hear your reasoning. An imposed solution involves Israel entrusting third parties on Security.The UN has proved to be unreliable liars.(witnessed the trans-border kidnapping of Israeli soldiers in UN marked vehicles and lied about it.) Does the USA want to commit troops for Hamas/Islamic Jihad target practice.? I won't sully my mouth by saying any more about the Europeans then appeasers with their heads deeply burried using the Israel /Palestinian issue for their own anti US agenda. How do see it?Kickout all the Jews and all terror will stop?

  • 371. 0 0
    Hahaha
    • Stephen Murray
    • 26.07.05
    • 10:53

    " "Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis," Sharon said in remarks broadcast Monday on Israel Radio." Whereas the Likud is a murderous, legal organisation whose actions have led to the murder and wounding of even more thousands of Palestinians by getting the IDF to do their racist dirty work. Likud is a dangerous, nasty racist group who believe in the racial superiority of Israelis over Palestinians so deserves every criticism.

  • 370. 0 0
    Yair thank you..........
    • Tity
    • 26.07.05
    • 09:57

    Yair thanks a lot..i really dont know how to thank you...i read today the things you wrote in your posts...very interesting things and MANY MANY similarities to my experiences. I got loads to tell you about International Relations by the way as it was my domain. How weird ha? Again thanks a lot for the support, u can email me at titymatsa@hotmail.com :) Un abrazo,

  • 369. 0 0
    295 dutch and EVERYBODY about franzi
    • bm
    • 26.07.05
    • 07:44

    dear doris the below is to be found on the forum run by yiur good friend johanes franzi - please understand why israelis and jews do not ever see you (who welcome his comments) and he who is blatantly a racist the following comments are from a welcomed pakistani lady writing on franzis hate site please read the comments and know not only about the writer (a pakistani living in the uk) but about the person who is not only permiting such writing but is encouraging it quote:- Do PIGS fly in Israel. Probably do - since all the Russian pork loving jews emigrated to Israel. OINK. unquote

  • 368. 0 0
    to Alikospah - Cripple Creek
    • Ron Depic
    • 26.07.05
    • 07:38

    You seem not to get the real facts in a straight manner, I suggest you update yourself on a few Middle East reality by reading : www.arabsforisrael.com www.shoebat.com

  • 367. 0 0
    The Mayor got it right!
    • Fadi
    • 26.07.05
    • 07:34

    The Mayor has not only made a strong point in his comparison between hamas and the likud, but has made it clear that he is a civilized leader that has the capacity to understand others regardless of his own people's hardships. And beyond this, even the people of london, are fully aware of the mistakes their leadership has committed. This in fact is a proof of how amazing these people are. Regardless of how much Blaire and Straw tried to steer away from the connection between the war in Iraq and the tragic events of london , most of the poeple survayed in various polls made it clear that they are not buying what Blaire is selling. They believe, and rightly so, that there is a clear connection between the war in iraq and these traqic events. Furthermore, sharon of all people has no right to accuse hamas of being a murderous organization. All what he needs to do is take a look at his own record which speaks for itself in a much louder voice than that of any other terrorist organization. This is of course not in anyway a justification of what hamas does. In fact it is absolutely not acceptable, and so is the work of sharon. Only a strong leader can stress this point clearly, the Mayor of london is a perfect example of such a leader. Because of him, london and its people have my out most respect. I wish Blair and Straw could learn from him and not from sharon and Bush. But obviously it makes all the sense from a political stand point to refuse any connection between the Iraq war-which is a complete mess and a clear mistake- and what is happening in london.

  • 366. 0 0
    205 Yair -either you misunderstood or you are misunderstood
    • Chafeeka
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:45

    In y our post you say that criticizing Israel folks here give you flack. It is very important not to frame the discussion in polarized terms. Deconstructing unfair criticism of Israel does not preclude fair criticism. Indeed, Israel's own parliament represents the entire political spectrum, where criticism of the country and its policies is often the order of the day. It is neither disloyal nor anti-Semitic to criticize Israel, as long as that criticism expresses both fairness and a respect for the complexity of the political situation. One can reasonably take a position that both sides have erred and both must assume some share of responsibility. But this is not the usual tone of the Jewish Israel-haters. It often seems as if Israel can do no right and the Palestinians no wrong. And this justifiably raises suspicion. Any position that demonizes Israel and exonerates the Palestinians flies in the face of reality and must be questioned. It tells us far more about those who hold the position than it does about Israel. Right now Israel's enemies are getting away with a very cynical public relations maneuver: You can demonize Israel, then when Israel's supporters protest, you accuse them of calling you an anti-Semite, even when they don't. The next step is to find Jews who are willing to express their own hatred for Israel. Then you can assert that because Jews are saying the same things, you're not an anti-Semite, even when you are. Israel should be criticized when warranted, but when Israel is criticized, it's important to examine the nature of that criticism and to understand what actually may be driving it. Because you stayed with an arab family and you had a wonderful experience, doesnt mean that that one family represents the majority of Palestinians

  • 365. 0 0
    Paki bashing
    • JJ Doyle
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:41

    Whatever intercommunal bad feeling Livingstone stirs up, will be paid for by the Pakistanis, and not by him.

  • 364. 0 0
    329 Muhammed a true prophet?
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:26

    you know that Muhammed married a child right? The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the Holy Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old. do you know of other prophets attracted to kids in such a way? that should answer if he is a true prophet or false

  • 363. 0 0
    #328 the matter remains the same he has not been convicted!
    • paul harris
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:17

    by the same set of circumstances abbas is a war criminal not only does he not stop terrorists from killing israeli civillians but actively encourages them. i am afraidd that whatever happened sharon failed to eliminate the plo! thus causing untold jewish and other deaths !

  • 362. 0 0
    #350 Israel the invader
    • Alikospah
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:13

    The fact remains, Israel is the invader. The Arabs were living there, growing olives etc. peacefully when the OK was given for Jews to come and live in equality among the Arabs. We have seen what the Jews actually did. They have staged massacres, murders. Two weeks ago the settlers attempted to "lynch" a 14 year old Palestinian, last week they managed to kill an 11 year old child. Yes, I believe what I said and I will also say I wouldn't care if Israel would drop off the map. It was a Holy Land to more than the Jews but the Jews have made it a land of blood and hatred. The US and Britain have brought peace to the world in past times, we have fed the millions all over the world for decades. It is Judah that creates strife and war where they are and right now they are a millstone around our necks. We are hated because we have given support to Israel. It is time for that support to end.

  • 361. 0 0
    Ned
    • Pt
    • 26.07.05
    • 06:01

    Based on your disingenous posts yesterday, I don't have much faith in the accuracy of your statements. I will need to do my own research. "PT you are implying that Palestinians should demolishe Tel Aviv University since it is built on a Palestinian village." I think they would if they could. They tried to destroy the Jewish community in 1947/1948. They didn't succeed and have suffered the consequences of their aggression ever since.

  • 360. 0 0
    Proud Zionist with head in ditchwater
    • Sarah from Somewhere
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:54

    Puffed up pop-in-jays have a way of being deflated. Your egoist diatribe means nothing and accomplishes nothing. Keep going, you are making my point with every post. How much lower can you go?

  • 359. 0 0
    to NED
    • batya dagan
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:51

    YOU really are pumped full of PA propaganda.This is why you did not hear about the Israeli plan of unifying ARAB families.Of course you also did not hear that under that banner many PA Arabs sneak into Israel because this is where they want to live.One woman had three babies in one year! PA gays flee into Israel in large numbers because in their beloved homeland they will be dead either by their own family or others in their loving community.Stop repeating the silly nonsense you collect like diamonds. And stop hating so much.It eats you alive and it distorts your thinking.The PA propaganda this this to you not the Jews,Get it?

  • 358. 0 0
    nedman
    • phillykid
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:51

    Thanks, Ned for your history lesson on the Moroccan Quarter. What I want to know is who attacked Israel on May 15, 1948? And who is attacking Israel today? To all proud Zionists out there, don't let the Neds of the world provoke you. Keep you eye on the ball. When Hamas says no mas, Likud will wither away. Until then, Jerusalem is Israel's.

  • 357. 0 0
    Sharon slams London mayor's 'ignorance' on Hamas and Likud
    • janos c. ferenzi
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:45

    I don't understand all these insults against ken livingstone, after all can someone demonstrate the contrary of what he said: -What is the reason of the us force bases in the middle east(saudi arabia,quatar...etc)? -Didn't we created oussama bin laden?(i'll remind you guys that 25 years ago we treated him as an hero while calling a real freedom figther like nelson mandela terrorist) -How can a serious person in that part of the world believes in us when we said we want democracy in iraq while at the same time we're "kissing" the saudis? -What are the alternatives that has been given to the palestinians for 45 years? -Who order the genocide in sabra and chatila? -My country,to be taken seriously would have started by sweeping the saudi monarchy:90% of the madrassas(islamist and jihadist schools) of pakistan are funded by the saudis. -I think we must leave those countries alone and find the alternatives to oil(we have universities and researchers who can do it). I'm not making any apology for the terrorism(i endorsed totally the war in afganistan,but the war in iraq is a racket)what i'm trying to say is that we have to stand in front of the mirror and ask ourself if what we've been doing in the middle east for the last 80 years is fair. -Another thing is that i don't understand why such a big part of the american taxpayer must be spent to defend israel instead of imposing the peace in that part of the world.

  • 356. 0 0
    SUMAYAH THANKYOU FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:38

    One Billion Muslims need the light you are showing them . Be encouraged The enemy of darkness cannot stand the light of truth .

  • 355. 0 0
    NED`S RACISM...
    • KJJ
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:37

    WHAT`S IT MEAN ``Besides, is he not a true zionist?`` A ZIONIST IS JUST A JEWISH PATRIOT ...IS ALL... WE ARE ALL PROUD ZIONIST`S

  • 354. 0 0
    Bainem 351 hiding behind bushes
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:36

    she is only here to spread out lies and hatred. I just do not agree with hainous behaviours. she might have been very frustrated, it`s not a reason for being a hateful crusader. first off Bainem you must follow the Muslims cult otherwise you wont try to speak behind my back the way you do and please no need dto apolotize for my poor behaviour I MEAN EVERY WORD I POST If you choose to live in denial that Islam is a cult of death and is dangerous even to YOU and using ME as your scapegoat accusing me of crusading?? hey fella what era do you come from?

  • 353. 0 0
    HEY M
    • batya dagan
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:31

    Where did you learn your history ? It looks as though you are a graduate of the university of lies and horrors run on the PA TV and in its papers.All the wounds the PA ARABS suffer from are self inflicted.True,they were saddled with a killer as a leader who worked like mad to destroy every chance of peace with Israel.Sharon did not kill the Arabs of the camps in Lebanon,the Christian soldiers who were butchred like dogs by the Muslims did. RED KEN is a boor and a bore who lies and exposes his city to Muslim terror by ignoring and appeasing it.Israel did not send these sad Muslims to london.They came in invited by the government who finally lives to regret it.

  • 352. 0 0
    AN ENCOURAGING WORD TO THE JEWISH PEOPLE ??
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:27

    YESHAYAHU (ISAIAH) Chapter 43 . " But now thus said the L-RD - Who created you , O Jacob , Who formed you , O Israel ; Fear not , for I will redeem you; I have singled you out by name , You are Mine . When you pass through water , I will be with you ; Through streams, They shall not overwhelm you. When you walk through fire , You shall not be scorched ; Through flame , It shall not burn you . For I the L-RD am your G-D , The Holy One of Israel , your saviour.............."

  • 351. 0 0
    Alan, you are wise, not Sumayah, because she shows too much hatred.
    • Bainem
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:20

    she is only here to spread out lies and hatred. I just do not agree with hainous behaviours. she might have been very frustrated, it's not a reason for being a hateful crusader.

  • 350. 0 0
    334 Terrorism the fault of Israel?
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:20

    hi Alikospah you really believe what you said in your post In the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, no matter what approach the US takes, there will be problems. Suppose the next US president does a great job, he's deserving of the Nobel peace prize, but there is stll tension, problems and conflicts. The Quran addresses a serious problem. The believers were struggling to get along with ther neighbors. since Israeli neighbours are Muslim so we check the Quran that might offer a solution what is the Quranic response to the difficulty? Quote: [2.191] And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. Quote: [5.33] The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His apostle and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement, Even if one were make the absurd argument that that most or even all humans could not design a better solution. Wouldn't it make sense to say that an All-mighty, all-merciful, All-Wise God could have invented a better solution? Best regards,

  • 349. 0 0
    *325 TULIP .
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 05:10

    Tulip , thankyou for your very helpful advise . May the blessing of BAMIDBAR (NUMBERS) 6 : 23-27 Amen and Amen . be upon you and all those you love and upon all Jews in the earth and upon Israel .

  • 348. 0 0
    # 339 Badge of Honour!
    • Ned
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:54

    Ha! of course to you it would be. If you know about british politics, I can only draw an analogy to the BNP. To make it closer to you, Were the SS not proud of wearing the swatsika? Oh yeah, that gays poster, i have seen a better one it says : "which country in the ME gives right to LGBT?- Only Israel!". The poster forgot to mention, that if your mother is not Jewish you cannot get married in Israel, or that if you are a Palestinian you cannot live with your wife in Israel or a whole load of the other laws enacted to preserve the Jewish nature of the state! Exactly as the BNP wants to preserve the white nature of Britain! Thank God they are not in Power. That would give Israel an example!

  • 347. 0 0
    @ned
    • frans
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:49

    How long a lie can go on in a mad world?

  • 346. 0 0
    #342 to KJJ
    • Ned
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:45

    "in case you never realized , your posting on a Jewish ZIONIST newspaper`s website...." Well, I have noticed that. But was it you or someone else who asked the webmasters to stop posting our 'crap'! Besides, is he not a true zionist? Does he not believe the this land has been given by G-D, only to 'His People'? If we are not His people, i wonder who created us?

  • 345. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:38

    you did say you were embarrassed

  • 344. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:38

    you did say you were embarrassed

  • 343. 0 0
    baniem re: Samayah
    • alan
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:31

    Sumayah is wise. I have read many of her posts. She has her reasons. Just as you have yours and i have mine. salaam/shalom

  • 342. 0 0
    Ned : Have some respect....
    • KJJ
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:26

    ``What a true zionist! congratulations!!`` in case you never realized , your posting on a Jewish ZIONIST newspaper`s website.... ``

  • 341. 0 0
    327 ARE ALL MUSLIMS DUMB??
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:19

    No need to adress a particular post of yours, they`re all the same.. pure hatred and lie, concentrated in unfinite messages. to waiste one`s time, I prefer at least fox news. What`s your problem, are you being a crusader? Were you disappointed by a muslim who has left you after a love story? I completely understand him if you were as bitter as now. isnt it typical of your ilk to swim around the issue of terror excuse me.. you dont swim in the desert.. maybe youre having a bad vision... if you want to know the truth what turned me off Islam Ill tell you gladly! to think that muslims could have it in them to fly airplanes into buildings and kill kill kill thinking that is what Allah made them do is what did it! verses like these killed it. "Wherever ye are, death will find you out, even if ye are in towers built up strong and high!" (Quran 4:78) O Prophet! make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate. Q. 66:9 arent you ashamed now belonging to such a "religion" that is hungry to kill thinking Allah asks them to????

  • 340. 0 0
    ignorence of the leaders
    • frans
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:14

    It's sad to say but the EU is ruled by this type of ignorend people. They look deep down on and disregard the interest of the hard working commen people who realy don't know nomore at this moment how to make ends meet. This because they always need to pay the bill of the next stupid mistake their leaders are making. And it seems they are only making mistakes when they do something. Madness. London has Livingstone......Amsterdam has his Cohen. Same cup of tea. In Holland they come out of the meltingpot of purple/red/green politics. Dangerous bunch who brought the country on his knees. They only needed 30 years. Holland was so famous to point out misbehaviour of other countries. Super hypocrits.

  • 339. 0 0
    Ned :What a true zionist! congratulations``
    • KJJ
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:13

    Thats an insult?? Most of us see it as a badge of honor :) http://www.bluestarpr.com/docs/gay.pdf

  • 338. 0 0
    a carryforward on the Moroccan quarter/ jewish quarter to PT
    • Ned
    • 26.07.05
    • 04:01

    PT yesterday said : "You do realize of course that the neighorhood had been Jewish for generations until the Jordanian army conquered it in 1948 and expelled all the Jews, stole their property and then desecrated all the their relgious sites." Two issues to raise here. 1. The old jewish quarter constituted about 20% of the area of the moroccan quarter. As since 1193 most of that area has belong to the Islamic Waqf, it was impossible to sell it to anyone! Jews lived in houses either rented from the waqf, or in an adjacent areas which was privately owned. Once the armistace was signed the Jews left the area. In June 10th 1967 the inhabitants of the Moroccan quarter were asked to evacuate, later that night the whole area was destroyed to make room for the Western wall Plaza and the remaining of the Jewish Quarter. 2. PT offers a very fine argument! by such an argumnet, PT you are implying that Palestinians should demolishe Tel Aviv University since it is built on a Palestinian village. Or maybe Kfar Sava, which is also built on the Ruins of Palestinian Kufur Saba. or for that sake all of the Israeli towns, They all lie on the remains of 480 destroyed villages. Don't they? Yes, PT, part of the area has been Jewish, but not the whole thing. and since 1967 the Jewish quarter has expanded, by expropiration more than otherwise 4 or 5 times.

  • 337. 0 0
    Cohen Brothers
    • Michael Bergman
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:57

    So, the IRA is right to blow up civilians in London! After all they only have their bodies to use against the might of the British Army.I wonder whether Livingstone would be so patronising if this happened.

  • 336. 0 0
    Bill on the pope
    • Ned
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:42

    "Along with islam and all other religions they are not to be trusted, they are liars ." What a true zionist! congratulations!

  • 335. 0 0
    Tulip
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:31

    I do not know much about the Quran, Tulip At this time everybody should get interested and understand even a little who is the evil phantom that is against democratic values that desires to spread via violence instilling terror in free countries killing innocents. 2001 was a turning point for me when the WTC came down. The inspiration the terrorists got is from none other than .... "Wherever ye are, death will find you out, even if ye are in towers built up strong and high!" (Quran 4:78) how horrid! the only way to stop these folks is by learning about them and knowing how they think

  • 334. 0 0
    Terrorism fault of Israel
    • Alikospah
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:21

    Who cares about Likud or Hamas? Why should anyone outside of Israel even know the difference? The fact is, Britain and the US have suffered terrorism because we have given support to Israel. It is time for that support to end. Let them go elsewhere. I do not support the means Israel uses, the land grab, forcing innocents out of their homes, to create a state when they were only offered a place to live in equality.

  • 333. 0 0
    Ronnie, why getting mad at Proud Z??
    • Bainem
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:11

    Hey, it's just a talkback! and getting away from the subject is what you both have been doing for a while.. Proud Z is intelligent, he surely have a good heart, it's just his mind that is too "zionist".. I mean, one can back Israel, as you do, but another will be blinded by his beliefs, which take precedence over his reasonnable mind. Proud Z might be too close to the events, and may feel obliged to back his camp 100%, and this makes him give up nothing, thinking it's gonna feed the other camp. Ronnie, le fier est aveuglé par sa cause, tout comme tant d'autres. Amicalement

  • 332. 0 0
    Sumayah, still feeling bad?
    • Bainem
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:05

    No need to adress a particular post of yours, they're all the same.. pure hatred and lie, concentrated in unfinite messages. to waiste one's time, I prefer at least fox news. What's your problem, are you being a crusader? Were you disappointed by a muslim who has left you after a love story? I completely understand him if you were as bitter as now.

  • 331. 0 0
    Bill the lost prophet (#317).
    • Bainem
    • 26.07.05
    • 03:02

    Be sure that quoting a religious book to make a point will just convince few initiated. Very usual to exclude the others.

  • 330. 0 0
    Anti-semites -Emes - PLO
    • Mike
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:50

    Why do you assume that someone posting with a Jewish name is not a Palestinian in Hebron or vice wersa? Why hasn't any Mulsim on the board answered two of my question? If the PLO is trying to liberate the West Bank and Gaza, why was it formed before 1967 when Israel first occupied the West Bank?

  • 329. 0 0
    IS MUHAMMED A TRUE PROPHET ??
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:35

    According to BERESHEET ( GENESIS ) Chapter 18 : 20 - 22 . If the words of a prophet do not eventuate he is a false prophet and you are not to fear him . Islam bases their control on fear . SECTS OF ISLAM : Muhammed predicted that his followers would become divided into 73 sects , every one going to hell , except one sect , the religion professed by himself and his companions . However the number of Islamic sects now number over 150 . This clearly makes Muhammed a false prophet worshipping a false god ( the moon god ) . One billion muslims are controlled by a strong spiritual DELUSION . May G-D open their eyes that they may see . AMEN .

  • 328. 0 0
    re 273 Paul Harris; Why Sharon is a war criminal
    • Ben Alofs
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:21

    I am a primary care physician. During the summer of 1982 I worked as a health worker in West-Beirut which at the time was besieged by the Israeli army. I witnessed Black Thursday the 12th of August when Israeli warplanes carpet bombed West-Beirut from the southern suburbs to the campus of the American University in the northern part. On that day hundreds of innocent people died as a result of the terror from the skies. As a trauma nurse I witnessed the results of this carnage. And all of this happened when the decision to evacuate the Palestinian forces had already been agreed upon! The worst was yet to come. After the Palestinian military had left Beirut the Israeli army broke its promise and occupied West-Beirut and surrounded the Palestinian refugee camps, Sabra and Shatila among them. Sharon, in his capacity as Defense minister, then sent groups of christian phalangist militiamen into the camps, 'to mop up'. He had made a false claim that there were still '2000-3000 terrorists' left behind in the camps. The operation took place only two days after Bashir Gemayel, the president elect, charismatic and ruthless leader of the phalangists, had been assassinated. Sharon had told AP that Palestinians were responsible, thereby heating up the atmosphere. In preparation for the 'mopping up' operation he held meetings in Beirut with the military and political leadership of the phalangists. Israeli army commanders like Eitan, Drori and Yaron made comments on how obsessed the phalangists were with revenge, talking about 'a sea of blood'. Sharon too was very well aware of the state of mind of the phalangist killers. But he went ahead any way and gave the green light. I was working in Gaza hospital in Sabra camp as part of a team of European and American doctors and nurses, helping our Palestinian colleagues. The phalangists came to the hospital, arrested us and brought us to the edge of Shatila camp. During our march we saw the shocking sight of murdered civilians lying in the street. The militiamen shot and killed a Palestinian medical colleague, who thought he would be safe in our company. They then set about to line us up against a wall to kill us. All the while the Israelis were watching from the perimeter of the camps. An Israeli army officer rode up and prevented our execution. We were taken to the Israeli military headquarters which was only a 100 yards away from the phalangist headquarters. While all this took place machine gun fire from the camps continued and we saw fresh groups of militiamen moving through the Israeli lines into the camps. It was sickening. Also sickening was the sight of an Israeli army bulldozer with Hebrew markings being used by the phalangists to bury the dead. I came back to Sabra and Shatila the day after the massacre ended and witnessed the terrible carnage that had been wrought by the phalangists. How many people were murdered I do not know. When the autumn rains in November blocked the sewage canals in the camps it turned out to be bodies that were causing the blockage. It is estimated that between 1200 and 2000 people died. The Israeli army as the occupying power was responsible for the safety of the civilian population. There were no armed 'terrorists' left behind in the camps. As it turned out the civilian population was unprotected. Who is responsible? Of course the killers themselves. Today they still are free men. The overall responsibility however is Sharon's. He could have stopped the operation, which of course was meant to terrorise the Palestinians out of Lebanon. That he knowingly gave the green light makes him a cold blooded and calculating war criminal. What we saw in Lebanon in 1982 was a prime example of Israeli state terrorism. Ken Livingstone's remarks are far from ignorant!

  • 327. 0 0
    Find the true meaning of terorrism
    • Me
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:19

    To all israelis and jewish.. before you said anything about the suicide bomb. Lets just start our nice discussion with counting how many palestinians and muslim around the worlds that you have been killed, and compare that with the number of israelis victims... i bet you'll be surprise to see the figures and for sure you'll agree with what the pope said!!! Just in case you can't count number, dig these infos from googles.. :-)

  • 326. 0 0
    LIVINGSTONE'S CRAWLING TO HIS CONSTITUENTS THE FALSE RELIGION OF ISLAM WILL NOT STOP THE BOMBERS UNFORTUNATELY ??
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:10

    Islam uses the spirit of Witchcraft ie ( the combined spirits of manipulation , domination , and intimidation ) to force , through fear , nations to do what they want them to do . Like Rome . Look at weak spain ? Their obeying of islam's demands to withdraw their troops from Iraq has just encouraged islam to spread their murder to other countries and will not stop spain from being bombed again . Muslims responds to one thing , that is strong ruthless force . G-D maybe using them for the judgement of the nations but their end will be the same as babylon's . G-D will destroy them on the mountains of Israel..Oh!! L-RD G-D of THE UNIVERSE let it be soon .

  • 325. 0 0
    Bill
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 02:04

    Bill, I suggest you keep track of Joachim Martillo's postings. He urges Rome to condem ISrael and if not, their quilt over the Holocaust is in vain.

  • 324. 0 0
    317 Sumayah
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:58

    I must say, Sumayah, your mails are always very interesting to read. You are very articulate as well. It is a pity I do not know much about the Quran, for I do not want to adapt things I am not sure of, but I studied Moroccan family law as part of my work with Moroccan immigrants, so I do know that the non-division between state and church has tremendous implications for especially women. You are a mysterious person but keep on posting!

  • 323. 0 0
    POPE CONDEMNS SUICIDE BOMBINGS IN EGYPT , BRITAIN , TURKEY , AND IRAQ BUT NOT IN ISRAEL ??
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:56

    Running true to form : Out of the lips of all popes : " Rome never changes " Rome is responsible for millions of true gentile believers in the G-D of Israel and jewish people throughout history . The progroms , inquisition , holocaust , the crusades to name a few incidents . Like Islam they make one comment and secretly believe another . Along with islam and all other religions they are not to be trusted, they are liars .

  • 322. 0 0
    #269 Avrams post as opposed to PZ's
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:44

    Proud Zionist maybe you should take a look at post #269 from Avram It also criticizes Yaakov but the man has sechel and knows how to say it eloquently,not in your manner. Maybe you could learn.

  • 321. 0 0
    # 109 re Muslim=Terrorist(?) Read for the answer
    • Sumayah
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:42

    The sad fact of the matter is that the people who flew planes into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, who blew up commuter trains in Madrid, who blew up subway trains in Londonarabia, who blow themselves up in ice cream parlors and discoteques in Israel in hopes of scoring with 72 virgins, who blew up vacationers in Bali, who commit acts of demonic brutality against their corelgionists in Algeria and Iraq, are, without exception, Muslims."" Greetings May I continue with poster 109 and add that folks vie for Palestinian state and say its going to be among other things "democratic" that makes me wonder... do they know anything about democracy or Islam? Democracy implies equality. But equality is unacceptable in Islam. In Western democracy, the people are sovereign; in Islam sovereignty is vested in Allah and the people are His caliphs or representatives. The laws given by Allah through His Prophet (Shari ?ah) are to be regarded as constitutional principles that should not be violated.Ayatollah Khomeini called democracy "a form of prostitution" because he who gets the most votes wins the power that belongs only to Allah. Sayyed Qutb, the Egyptian who is credited to be the ideological mentor of Safalists, spent a year in the United States in the 1950s and wrote: " America is a nation that has forgotten God and been forsaken by Him; an arrogant nation that wants to rule itself." So what kind of government Islam is proposing? Democracy means the rule of people. This is unacceptable in Islam. The Quran is empathic that ?to Allah belong all Dominion and power? (2.165, 35:10, 35:13, 64:1). The words ?No judgment but God?s? (la hukm illa li-llah) is based on several Quranic verses (esp. 6.57; 12.40, 67 etc.) This power is vested on His regent known as Khalifat al-Allah. The Khalifa cannot legislate. He can only interpret the Law given in the Quran and the sunnah So what kind of government Islam is proposing? Democracy means the rule of people. This is unacceptable in Islam. The Quran is empathic that ?to Allah belong all Dominion and power? (2.165, 35:10, 35:13, 64:1). The words ?No judgment but God?s? (la hukm illa li-llah) is based on several Quranic verses (esp. 6.57; 12.40, 67 etc.) This power is vested on His regent known as Khalifat al-Allah. The Khalifa cannot legislate. He can only interpret the Law given in the Quran and the sunnah and apply it.Islam Online O Prophet! make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate. Q. 66:9 Let us search Quran, the source of all knowledge and truth. Let us see what Quran has to say on this. God gradually reduces the land controlled by unbelievers...21:44 (Quran) What is the message in the above verse? God (Allah) clearly says that He will make sure that the unbelievers will slowly start losing their land when a country falls under the hand of Islam. Is there any confusion? I ask those Islamists who always hide under the pretext of 'misquoting', 'out of context' argument.. Can you please tell us: is it a misquote? What is the context of this verse? Ibrahim, Khalil, Khaled, Dutch Rosgarten Sarah from somewhere Franzen Sullivan I particularly address my post to you who blindly fight for the Palestinian cause

  • 320. 0 0
    #263 Benny
    • evelyn
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:41

    they will screw it up anyway, and Israel will take it over again.

  • 319. 0 0
    Yair
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:37

    Yair, do not feel offended. It is not worth it. I hope you will be able to build relations, maybe through your profession. Where does boredom stand for? Tulip

  • 318. 0 0
    Emes - truth I believe
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:36

    Thanks for the last word,as you are aware it negated everything you said in your post but you dont care about that.Thats what you feel is funny. You can be articulate and then bang.Cannot let that go. When right wing despots call for the carpet bombing which Ive heard here of Gaza after the settlers leave that to me is disgusting but also you and PZ's arrogance in playing with these words. I consider it in the 'Personal Attack' area of the rules and maybe Haaretz should take a look again at these. I know merchandising is not a strength of some of right wing thinking. To me its rude. But hey from whence it comes.

  • 317. 0 0
    FIRST TO THE JEW THEN THE GENTILE (NATIONS )
    • Bill
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:29

    There is a principle which is throughout the Tanakh ( Bible ) that is - everything happens first to the Jew then the Nations . The nations stood by and watched Israel suffering at the hands of the mad islamic faith , and did not even care .Now the nations are being suicide bombed .

  • 316. 0 0
    Israel and appeasment
    • Chaim
    • 26.07.05
    • 01:22

    I wonder how the world would react if the london and madrid terrorism was proven to have been ordered by the leadership of Iran or Libia or Syria or Lebenon. Would they promiss to provide them with $50,000,000.00 each and every month to help them foster their state sactioned Terror. Israel Wake up there is no action or act that you undertake that would appease the worlds hatred against the "Jew". I do not live in Israel but am astonished at the stupidity of the leadership that goverens them. historicly there never was any period that the middle east was in peace. I understand that it is repugnent to demand that the entire moslem population be expeled to any other country as such is defined as "Ethnic Cleansing" but to make the rest of the middle east Juden Rein "JEW FREE" is laudable and encoraged by the entire world. Do what ever you think may bring you a measure of peace but know that your childern and grandchildern will either be totaly eradicated or have to continually be at war with the moslems to understand their idology just read a book called "HAJ" it is both telling and very frighting.

  • 315. 0 0
    To Ronnie Wolman
    • Emes
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:57

    Ronnie- on these forums things sometimes get heated, but overall Proud Zionist writes substantive points rather than just emoting. It is important when possible to expose people like Yaakov for who they are, because it explains why they won't address substantive facts, but rather mindlessly regurgitate propaganda. And in the case of outright self-haters like Yaakov or to those like Yair who only pipe up when it's time to express their embarrassment "as a Jew" it is all the more important to both counter their points and to expose them when possible. This is because those not in the know are liable to assume that because the anti-Israel viewpoint is being expressed by someone with a Jewish name it is somehow more balanced and therefore closer to the truth. Plus the assortment of non-Jewish anti-Semites and anti-Zionists out there just love to lap up the words of these convenient idiots.

  • 314. 0 0
    Free the Tartan State: Ken from English Terrorism
    • Sandman
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:56

    Ken Livingston: Did not Richard the 3rd , draw and quarter alive the Scot William Wallace and 24 of his followers. Was not Wallace head placed on pole at the tower of London while his body placed on 4 poles in Scotland. Did not English terrorize the Scotish country side by taking married Scot women as there due with swords to husbands hearts: burn there house, food, and kill there children...aaah Ken your National Socalist Workers party you work with still have that oder of the morally impaired.

  • 313. 0 0
    Palestinian off spring
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:45

    Sam in 282:Why do they keep having offspring when there is no prospect of caring for them ? Well the $$$s come from the UN and the EU. The greatest welfare case in history. Sam, I am 100% for birth control for many reasons, but I think this is a bit, as we say in Holland, bend-cutting. It sounds not so sympathetic. I do not believe they get children because on forehand they think they will get paid anyway. On the contrary.

  • 312. 0 0
    honest and non-violent
    • kay for Mordecai and Tali
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:44

    Ken Livingstone is for headshooting-out of question, I usually don`t like people like him. He might say things which are true..but no, there are other people, who are honest AND non-violent. It should be somewhere on www.propagandamatrix.com and on my website anyway. www.geocities.com/kayforpeace/kayforpage.html

  • 311. 0 0
    Arik vs Ken
    • django
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:27

    Arik can sputter and spit all he wants, but Ken is one politician who isn't in Israel's pocket and will say exactly what he thinks. Incidentally exactly what a lot of people think -- even a lot of politicians who daren't say what they think, especially in the US. Right on, Ken

  • 310. 0 0
    Divesting in Israel ? Dumb move
    • Alex
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:25

    Let's see, Intel invested more than a billion dollars to build it's FAB 18 plant in Kiryat Gat. They plan on building another $4B plan there in the near future. Motorola has it's largest development center outside the US in Israel and earned $1.2B of the overall $27B in 2003 revenues. Teva just bought IVX and is now the #1 in the industry, Verint, Amdocs, ECI ? to name a few, companies with substantial growth over the past year.

  • 309. 0 0
    Joe Barnathan
    • django
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:23

    Rudy was wrong in 2002 and you are wrong now. The Saudi prince didn't try to make any connection between 9/11 and Israel's illegal occupation and brutalization of the Palestinians. He merely suggested it would be a good idea to look at that situation. Of course Israel and its lackey, Rudy, took umbrage. Ken has it exactly right.

  • 308. 0 0
    IDF SOLDIER
    • django
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:20

    This just proves that the Jews are once again a scapegoat for any thing wrong that happens in the world, nothing has changed. -- It proves no such thing. It just verifies that some really bad things are being done by some really bad jews.

  • 307. 0 0
    PZ, Amazing post! (#245)
    • Shai
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:17

    You really summed up my feelings about this nasty bit of work. Well done.

  • 306. 0 0
    Yair
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:15

    Yair, ik kan je niet mijn persoonlijk email geven, want dan zien die andere gekken het. Ik heb geen zin in mails van je-weet-wel-wie. I came to Israel during a sabbatical from work, now I do all kind of things as a HR consultant in the medical field and also sometimes in the relocation business. I have been helping out in a childrens care center in A-tur, the neighbourhood next to your campus. Campus is on top of Scopus, A-tur is on top of Mt. of Olives.

  • 305. 0 0
    Ronnie Wolman
    • Proud Zionist
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:11

    Ronnie, You are more morally obtuse than I thought. Yaakov comes to this website every day to demonize Jews and traffic with our enemies during times of war, but you are mad at me (and not him) because I am impolite. Wow. All I can say is that people like Yaakov (enemies of Israel) deserve no respect and get no respect. Period. "You probably dont care as you see it as a war,but maybe you could say what your saying without using words like idiot,stupid and many other verbs. I dont talk to you like that,Yaakov doesnt so what need is there of you to talk like that if you`ve got the essence of what you are saying right?" You are wrong, Yaakov is incredibly rude and calls people fascist, etc. Again, I won't apologize for not being polite with those who demonize Israel daily and come to hurt Jews. Look at my accusations against Yaakov (all true) and tell me how you can dare defend him? If you do, you are as immoral as him. If you think I'm a worse person than Yaakov (who signed a divestment petition against Israel during a time of war) because I use coarse language, you are dumb. You saying you don't read what I write is an obvious lie, as you always write to me first and not vice versa. You obviously read PZ quite carefully, maybe I'll suceed in knocking some sense or morals into your thick head...

  • 304. 0 0
    258 Yair
    • Tulip
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:10

    I had already written you again, but now I see this posting. Well, also for non-religious people Jerusalem can be fun. I have Jews, Christians,Palestinians and atheists as friends....I come originally from Amsterdam, was born and raised there, but did my high school in Haarlem. After that I studied law in Leiden and San Francisco. I started as an attorney but I had heart surgery because of mitral valve prolaps and life after that has never been the same anymore. The profession of attorney became too fast for me. Boredom???? Kinda vague.... Well, it think I will call it a night soon. Tulip

  • 303. 0 0
    Tulip re # 266
    • Chanah
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:10

    Khalil is a real nice guy, hey Tulip? Intelligent and polite. Bet he treats his women with the utmost respect and dignity - especially regarding their opinions. Keep smiling.

  • 302. 0 0
    #296 the truth and its perceptions are not bitter tulip
    • paul harris
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:06

    tulip , keeping you all on track must be hard but it is necessary!

  • 301. 0 0
    #299 Mbrandi
    • Yair
    • 26.07.05
    • 00:04

    Guilt does not come into it: I do not feel guilty AT ALL. I'm not responsible for those acts. I would be responsible if I didn't do anything to make things better at present... I WANT A SOLUTION FOR THOSE PEOPLE, that's all. No guilt implied, Yair

  • 300. 0 0
    Lieve Tulpje
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:55

    Dank je voor je aardige woorden! Ik heb het nu nodig, want ik ben ontzettend beledigd/geschokt door bericht 274 (bericht 289 legt uit waarom; bericht 270/271 als je de achtergrond wilt weten van waarom het me zo raakt). I'm going to teach International Relations at Hebrew U, but my background is in economics. I did a PhD in European integration. Will be living at Mount Scopus campus next year. Cool, ey? After that, don't know. I'm planning on establishing myself in Israel long-term, but we'll have to see how things work out. What do you do again? I know you've worked as a lawyer and in an orphanage, but what do you do now? A hug, Yair

  • 299. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:53

    you are not responsible for what happened in 1948 and neither am i. what is this collective guilt that you must feel embarrassed about this? i don't hold anything against any european or american for the holocaust under the age of 80. do you? equally i don't feel guilty about palestinians rotting in those refugee camps for almost 60years.the closest i feel to that situation is stupidity for allowing it to go on. yair,you seem to overlook the sins of your neighbors why not do the same for your own people?

  • 298. 0 0
    #289 so you had no personal experiences yair
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:50

    the question was a simple one ! it needed a simple answer. you do not need excuses as an answer!

  • 297. 0 0
    Avram ...we represent beauty
    • rich
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:49

    have faith avram, i know you do.... good always defeats evil in the long run.... the people of israel will always outlive their tormentors we are the world's health barometer....the better it is for the Jews the better is the state of the world and vice versa..... our enemies represent darkness and all that is low and mean in the human spirit.....but no matter how dark,,,,a little light in the darkness makes a big difference..... The more they shout and scream the more I know that we represent beauty.

  • 296. 0 0
    Paul on Yair (and others)
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:48

    Listen Paul, I know you have your heart in the right place, but are some of your questions, comments not a bit off track? You sound so bitter? Please keep believing in the good side of people.

  • 295. 0 0
    # 280 PZ & Yaakov
    • Dutch
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:47

    PZ--- I am so glad Yaakov is here every day to monitor how you chew the truth and fabricate it along the way. But we all need to have a Live and Let Live Policy because it saves us all from the tyranny of one another. Dutch

  • 294. 0 0
    Mbrandi #286
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:45

    "just because the neighbors know you are jewish and don`t attack you doesn`t mean diddly squat" I think my experiences with Arabs have been a bit more profound than that. If that did not come across in messages #270 and #271, there really is no hope. I'm getting desperate on this forum: why can't people LISTEN?

  • 293. 0 0
    Proud Zionist
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:44

    I really hope you take this in the way it was intended but the style of your writing could be different.That is what I personally find aggravating and why I rush to defend Yaakov against you.You speak with arrogance and talk horribly to people. This style really bothers me more than anything. You probably dont care as you see it as a war,but maybe you could say what your saying without using words like idiot,stupid and many other verbs. I dont talk to you like that,Yaakov doesnt so what need is there of you to talk like that if you've got the essence of what you are saying right? It just inflames and doesnt help the debate or discussion. I quite frankly dont look at the essence Yaakovs comments compared to yours if you want to know the truth,for the amount of verbal abuse you send. If you dont care,its ok,I dont care either. I can take it but dont really read too much after that of what you write,because I know from whence it comes.

  • 292. 0 0
    shut up
    • rich
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:44

    livingstone is a power crazy unprincipled egomaniac regardless of whether you agree or disagree with his views. he is also a lot less intelligent than he obviously thinks he is. but he is not alone...too many people of v low intelligence hold positions of authority. no good can come from livingstone, prob is he knows how to get headlines and publicity and his challengers are too boring to get voters....sad state of affairs

  • 291. 0 0
    antisemitism
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:43

    and for you gentiles on this board please read 286 and you might see why jewish people like to "stick together".

  • 290. 0 0
    yair and ethnic cleansing
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:39

    "I think denying the ethnic cleansing that happened in 1948 is historically very weak: take any decent (objective) history book. Morally, it`s even worse: it`s equal to Serbian denial of Sebrenica, Hutu denial of the Tutsi genocide, and David Irving`s denial of the holocaust. Please don`t lower yourself to that level. It embarrasses me as a Jew." You are wrong on all counts. The Palestinians rejected the U.N. partition plan (Israel accepted) and waged a war of attempted genocide (along with 5 Arab armies) against a people who had survived the Holocaust and had been ethnically cleansed from Arab lands. They were the aggressors, obviously. Many times, countries or actors lose territory in aggressive wars. This certainly isn't "ethnic cleansing" (many Germans were relocated at the end of WWII, many Pakistanis and Indians were relocated, etc). Secondly, the Palestinians were encouraged to flee by their leaders in the majority of cases. Lastly, if you want to be a proud Jew, stop uncritically accepting the narrative of those who wish to destroy Israel. There are enough anti-Semites in the world who question Israel's every move, we don't need Jews who are weak on the truth.

  • 289. 0 0
    paul harris #274
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:33

    Paul, this is ridiculous: I'm a TUNISIAN Jew. I know the Arabic world inside out. I've both suffered attacks and enjoyed great friendships. How on earth do you know how long I've been living in Barcelona for? Don't you think it's incredibly arrogant to make assumptions like that about somebody's life. By the way, I'm moving to Jerusalem in November. My life story, at least in terms of contact with Arabs, can be found in message #270 and #271. I hope you read it and get off your high horse. You know nothing about the respondents on this forum and can't make suppositions about their lives. That's totally out of line and incredibly disrespectful. Imagine if somebody implied that you were lying about having lost family members in the holocaust. It's an insult to the traumas I and my family have suffered.

  • 288. 0 0
    What You are all saying ignores the issue, Guinea is still in Sierra Leone
    • Dick Diver
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:31

    What you are all saying ignores the issue which is one of two warring nations,but also between prehensile penises and mountainous mammary glands. Let's say it how it is and also take into account the Guinean occupation of Sierra Leone and the Chinese occupatin of Kashmir, both are occupations. But a prostitute will never be considered a legitimate occupation, unless we change the way our society thinks.

  • 287. 0 0
    Albertp
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:24

    Alberto, Obviously you've understood little of the contents of my messages. I believe in the existence of Israel, and I have no problem with making Aliyah whatsoever. I love Israel, and may it prosper eternally. However, I don't want my luxury of finally having a state (as a Jew), to cause misery to another people. Therefore I'm profoundly convinced of the need for a Palestinian state. I'm embarrassed by Israel's policies, even more so as a proud Jew. I want something better for Israel: I hope you understand this is out of love for the country, not out of hatred. Regarding Jerusalem, I hope the city will once be a capital to two different nations. Again, I don't see how my Aliyah has any influence on that. Clearly I'm going to be living in the West. The "flattering label of self-hating Jew" was OBVIOUSLY an ironic statement. Do I have to make EVERYTHING explicit? I think denying the ethnic cleansing that happened in 1948 is historically very weak: take any decent (objective) history book. Morally, it's even worse: it's equal to Serbian denial of Sebrenica, Hutu denial of the Tutsi genocide, and David Irving's denial of the holocaust. Please don't lower yourself to that level. It embarrasses me as a Jew.

  • 286. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:15

    was in barcelona in november and loved it. look,i don't want you to be paranoid but just because the neighbors know you are jewish and don't attack you doesn't mean diddly squat.excuse the americanism. as an aside last month my good friend {church going christian)speaking about a mutual friend said "I know you won't like this but she is a cheap jew".this person only has a masters degree though.

  • 285. 0 0
    271 Yair
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:14

    What do you hope you will be able to do in Israel, Yair? What do you teach? You seem to have a very balanced look at the things. That's good Yair, zo zal je leven in Israel een stuk gemakkelijker zijn. Groetjes, Tulip

  • 284. 0 0
    PZ 259
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:04

    Maybe not in Dubai, but in many other Islamic countries they are not fond of educated women, Proud Zionist.

  • 283. 0 0
    Chiva, you're wrong
    • Sam
    • 25.07.05
    • 23:01

    The only problem with your post is that Hamas deliberately targets children and women...whereas the IDF is very proficient in eliminating mass murderers.

  • 282. 0 0
    Population explosion
    • Sam
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:58

    From Moder: "at the current rate of expansion the palestinans would probably be wiped out by 2050 !!" Not so fast Moder from London...at the current birth rate of the Palestinians (400 births a day in the West Bank alone) there will be no walking space for them by 2040. Why do they keep having offspring when there is no prospect of caring for them ? Well the $$$s come from the UN and the EU. The greatest welfare case in history.

  • 281. 0 0
    Illigitimacy
    • Giles
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:56

    Mr. Harris has it right in response 278... That a suicide bomber or other agent takes the lives of a random set of an "enemy" population is a great transgression. A backlash can be expected, sympathy for their cause lessened or dispelled, a cause to be villified.

  • 280. 0 0
    The Truth about Yaakov Sullivan, Volume II
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:55

    I would love to see a point-by-point rebutttal of post 245, but I'm sure that as usual you have chosen to run away from my exposure of your self-hating biases... I will always be here to prevent your daily slander and libel of Israel.

  • 279. 0 0
    maybe you should look inward
    • Sam
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:49

    Mr. Ahmad Abouali of Nablus: Before you become too critical of Likud (vs Hamas) you should realize that Likud does not endorse the wholesale slaughter of women and children the way Hamas does. If I'm not mistaken that is the definition of genocide.

  • 278. 0 0
    #236 man gets facts mixed up, why fight when you can get a credit card!
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:41

    dear anon, you should check some of your facts the usa have never given or approved of israel having nuclear weapons. the usa has used israel as its major fortress in the mid east since 1948. the choice of destroying oneself is always with the suicide bomber no one else, and if you think? what does it actually acheive ? nothing but counter destruction of much greater velocity morons like livingstone in encouraging these things never think of the real cost to the bomber and his people!

  • 277. 0 0
    Ad's question
    • deborah
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:31

    Ad- "They don't have tanks, guns, what do you expect them to use?" How about their brains, politics, public opinion, or if they must kill how about aiming at legitimate combatants like soldiers instead of students on busses and shoppers in malls? If they aimed at a battalion and bystanders got killed it would be one thing, but they AIM for women and children. That's what's dispicable.It'ds not collateral damage, it is intended murder of innocents.

  • 276. 0 0
    It's not a question of means ad, its a question of decisions
    • Jacob Blues
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:16

    And the Palestinians have decided that their strategy is to target civilians. Whether by suicide bomb, gun, quassam rocket, et al, the issue is not that they are fighting a war (they are) but that they have eliminated any dividing line between combatant and civilian and actually have decided on a strategy of civilian attacks. The other issue is that they continue to choose war. The option that remains ignored is one of non-violence.

  • 275. 0 0
    253
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:16

    why go after civilians?why committ suicide? arabs love to proclaim about their HONOR. where is the honor in terrorism?

  • 274. 0 0
    #227 yair claims to know the sound of bullets !
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:15

    ok yair so what is your point? its very comfortable in barcelona isnt it ! what is YOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF ANYTHING !!!

  • 273. 0 0
    #226 marlene see wht the boys in the back room will have , comes back empty handed
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:12

    marlene, who is the war criminal you are referring to? to be a war criminal you have to be convicted after a trial , just like any other type of criminal!!! in fact sharon wa stwice cleared by hearings !

  • 272. 0 0
    249
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:10

    if i had it my way there would be a one state solution.right bank,left,gaza,sinai,golan. equal rights to everyone,right of return to everyone.all would swear allegiance to israel.the right of return for jews world wide would be eternal.could never be changed.ever. could this work?after generations of jew hatred brainwashing?I think they have made sure it wouldn't.

  • 271. 0 0
    Brandi, a little Post Script
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:09

    P.S. By the way, I now live in the `old city` of Barcelona, the 2nd poorest district in town. Most of the inhabitants are newly arrived immigrants (roughly 40% are muslims, mainly Moroccans and Pakistanis). They all know I`m Jewish and I`ve not had any problems. For one year I lived in a flat with an Algerian guy who had great sympathies for Bin Laden. At one staged I suspected him to have links with Al Qaeda, but with hindsight I think that that was a somewhat paranoid assumption. We got on surprisingly well, and I managed to get quite a few points across, as did he to me. He actually even mediated once between me and my other housemate, a 22-year old drugdealer (himself addicted to various types of drugs), now in prison, who had put a knife on my throat. Unfortunately, I had no money to move. It was for obvious reasons the cheapest accomodation I could find. I was doing my PhD, and working as a university teacher, but unfortunately without a PhD, university teachers in Spain make the minimum wage. I now have a PhD, but as it takes the university 2 years to produce the physical diploma, I still earn the same salary. Don`t worry, I`ve finally managed to find another flat that costs about the same, in the same (criminal and dangerous) ghetto but with much nicer people.

  • 270. 0 0
    Mbrandi
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:08

    I'm very sorry to hear that... I truly am. My experiences have been slightly different. Let's say that I've had a lot of contact with Arabic people, and a couple of very nasty experiences, but lots of very positive experiences as well. I'll just summarise: First of all, I`m a Tunisian Jew (with ancestors from other Arabic countries as well). That way, obviously I was partially formed by Arabic culture. Although peaceful coexistence was the norm (and the behaviour of the vast majority of my family's neighbours and friends), several of my family members have been both raped and murdered for being Jews in the Arabic world. I spent quite some time in Egypt and Jordan as well (the latter of which has a Palestinian demographic majority), without btw ever hiding my ethnic identity. I was then 18 and 19 years of age respectively, and never had any problems. I also lived in Morocco for 6 months, in a purely muslim society, with only one other non-muslim within a perimeter of 50 kilometers (that I knew of). This was more recently, in my twenties, when Jihad was already a big theme. Oh and one important point: the time I spent in Morocco was not as either a student or an academic. I was doing unpaid building work with totally unschooled local Moroccan boys (voluntary project). It was certainly not a soft and sweet experience, but I can`t describe it as particularly extremist... Most of the people of my city were more interested in making a living than in any worldwide Islamic doctrine. Having said that, I did have a few horrible anti-semitic experiences (mainly in Morocco), including being threatened to death twice. However, this was perpetrated by a small group of people (well, actually they were 2), and my muslim co-workers immediately stood up for me, protected me, and the aggressors were duly punished within their own community structure. After the second time (the most serious incident), nothing similar ever happened again. Intra-community punishment worked very well. I`m telling you from my own direct experience that, yes, Islam has some nasty aspects to it, and I suffered them directly, both as an adult and within my family. However, what I saw was that the majority of muslims are very decent people, without any extremist aspirations. I only see frustration in their eyes regarding certain aspects of the West, but nothing that can`t be cured with a bit of `reasonableness`. The latter type of attitude would totally undercut the extremists` possibilities to mobilise more moderate people. This is my own direct experience, and I come from the muslim world, and me myself and my family have suffered from various attacks in the name of islam. I think most people are quite reasonable everywhere, but unfortunately the extremists among us force moderate people to take radical stances besides them. I sincerely hope you'll have better experiences in the future, Yair

  • 269. 0 0
    yaakie sullivan - who are you?
    • Avram
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:07

    you have never said ONE GOOD thing about Israel on these discussion boards. As Proud Zionist pointed out, you come here to bash Israel and her Jewish population and make it seem as if we're 100% to blame for the situation. I've YET TO SEE YOU condemn any Palestinian activities against us. But honestly, I could care less. You write really well (like Khalid) but the Israelis who live here, who believe that we will be ok and who understand what the word "Achva" ve "ahavat achim" means will survive this, like we've survived every onslaught from the Arab world and any other sector of this globe that has decided that wee lil Israel has pissed 'em off. I only wish you health and happiness. You deserve that because the path you have chosen to bash your supposed 'brothers' is pretty sad ...

  • 268. 0 0
    Khalil
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:04

    Oh and Khalil, I think I am more aware of the situation, standing with my feet in the sh...every weekend than you in your comfortable Dubai. End of discussion.

  • 267. 0 0
    Khalil
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:03

    Khalil, you are sharp, but I am not impressed.

  • 266. 0 0
    # 239 Tulip Black and Whi
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:02

    Tulip, congr, you discover that my prophet is Prof Robert Pape,what about your prophet Mr. Danial Pipsicola!

  • 265. 0 0
    # 133 + #220 Yair
    • Alberto
    • 25.07.05
    • 22:01

    As a matter of interest,I would like to ask you,if I may kindly: 1) If you are Jewish as you claim to be,do you honestly believe in what you say:" Jewish settlement leading to "ethnic cleansing" ? 2)If you are the"Yair" who is moving to "Jerusalem" in November,is it "Jerusalem/Palestine,you are hoping to be one day ? or is it on Aliyah to Jerusalem,in Israel.in the Land of Israel? 3)If it is indeed in Israel,would you not agree that your own Aliyah would be adding even more so to "decades of occupation" which you yourself claimed to be the case? 4)" the flattering label of self hating Jew"!,is it not politically correct to say"the insulting label of self-hating Jew ? I am only asking.

  • 264. 0 0
    The European left is pathetic.......
    • Maimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:58

    ...If they are not busying themselves with pro-palestinian mumbo-jumbo (mumbo-jumbo because they NEVER EVER talk about the palestinians half as much as about why Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state, mumbo-jumbo because the ONLY arabs whose rights they care about are the ones in Judea and Samaria), they are pushing anti-EU propaganda, or discussing whether the Serbian murdering of Bonisak muslims really took place (why exactly are they siding with islamofashists in the ME and with muslim killers in the Balcans?). Redneck Ken is simply a symptom of a post-Berlin-wall ill that for some strange reason seem to have contaminated the democratic and anticommunist left as well. And Sharon is the hero of the Israeli left....the world is really weird at the moment.....

  • 263. 0 0
    To:Evylin
    • Benny Brillstein
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:58

    Sharon is about to evict Jews from the Gaza, the whole wide world is on our case and you don't want to credit the Palestinians with having a hand in it?

  • 262. 0 0
    # 229 I AM GLAD THE BRITISH ARE SIPPING THEIR TEA
    • Dutch
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:57

    DeeDee-- It's too bad you seem to resent London's tolerance. I say thank God for British tolerence and may they go on sipping tea and not creating more terror like the Israelis and Americans are doing now around the world. This may or may not come back to haunt Ken Livingstone. Still, should that be a reason for him to withold his opinion?? I think not. Men and women of courage are not frightened by the fear of the unknown. Otherwise, they will become crippled and will be unable to serve anyone--let alone themselves. So best he speaks his mind... Dutch

  • 261. 0 0
    Palestinians need to take a lesson from Martin Luther King
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:56

    Martin Luther King is a hero for both blacks and whites in this country. Blacks were treated as second class citizens in the United States for a long time. Lynchings were common and there are plenty of pictures to prove it. Martin Luther King took the high road and achieved rights for blacks through peaceful means. He encouraged equal rights for all but not at the expense of people's lives. He called for calm and reasoning when whites retaliated against these peaceful marchers. What a great man he was and it's sad that he never got to see his goal realized. Terrorism will never get the positive attention from people, but peaceful actions will.

  • 260. 0 0
    Yair
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:53

    No siding with keeping gaza sadly isnt what the state of Israel wants although i pray that somehow it doesnt happen. I do not like the excuse of arabs lvig in poverty so they blow themselves up. Its a garbage excuse for MANY reasons of which here are a few: 1)the arabs in london werent poor, nor were the ones in the US who killed so many people...so arabs blowing themlseves up out of poverty doesnt apply to those OR these. 2)The arabs are actually mcuh more free AND wealkthy then they were under Jordan and they NEVER blew upjordan, only israel....why is that?!?!?!? (that is a question NO arab has answred) 3)NO other poeple EVER blew themselves up and took as many innocent people witht hem ebcause they were poor!! NEVER!! Not somolians, not africans under an apartheid, not poor pople in america....none of them. Only arabs...they have nobody to blame but themselves!!

  • 259. 0 0
    Khalil vs. Tulip
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:51

    "Tulip, beter educate your self rather than do love story and hunting lovers." Tulip, good thing you don't live in Khalil's country, he'd probably try to cut your hand off so you couldn't type anymore!

  • 258. 0 0
    Hola Tulipita
    • Yairtje
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:51

    Yeah, Jerusalem is very beautiful, but it scares me a bit. I'm totally a-religious, actually quite the opposite in terms of lifestyle... ;) The conflict is also so noticeable in Jerusalem, I don't know if I can deal with so much aggression. Anyway, I've been offered a job at the Hebrew University (that's why I'm going to Jerusalem). Gonna be teaching kids of my own age... (well, nearly). It's hilarious. Especially with my baby-face (terrible: makes me look even 5 years younger!). I'm now 26, and just got my PhD done. Uuuuuuuuuf. 426 pages about one topic: boredom!!! I got my Israeli citizenship at 22, which means that I only have to do 3 months, so that's not a major issue. Waar kom je oorspronkelijk vandaan in Nederland? Ik ken veel Joodse mensen uit Amsterdam, vooral van de LJG... Speak to you soon, Yair

  • 257. 0 0
    236
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:49

    they should open casinos like our indians and laugh all the way to the bank!!!!!!!!!!

  • 256. 0 0
    soooo?
    • enlightened
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:47

    Whats your point Roy? Is it a pun , a riddle or a game of semantics?

  • 255. 0 0
    Fhads ignorance
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:43

    The simple difference, is that the large majority of palestinians killed were TERRORISTS WHO DESERVED TO DIE BECUASE THEY WERR TARGETTING INNOCENT PEOPLE!!! The targets of hamas were children!!! If you dont see the difference, you are just as bad as hamas.

  • 254. 0 0
    # 235 Michelle & # 239 Tulip but black
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:41

    Do you know FIFO, first in first out Michioooo? Tulip, beter educate your self rather than do love story and hunting lovers.

  • 253. 0 0
    michelle 242
    • ad
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:38

    I asked a question, and you didn't answer(of course). Yes, the suicide bombers have targetted civilians, and I DO believe that it is wrong. My point however is that they have very limited options in how they fight back. Without tanks and jets, all they have to fight back with is their lives.

  • 252. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:38

    so you got involved in arab life..what does that mean?you had an arab friend or friends? well my dear yair so have I.my husband and I best friends with an arab couple for many years. when my baby was 4months old we (without asking)left him with the arabs mother.upon return she told us proudly she didnt think a jewish baby would be cute and she'd be able to care for one.I let it pass.of course we didn't discuss politics.EVER.then I heard gross antisemitism from the mouths of their children.really bad stuff.not political. then my mother who they knew for many years died.they did not attend the jewish funeral.I should understand.then my father.more understanding.of course they went to my husbands fathers (not jewish) funeral. what should I think yair? another (iranian this time)...I thought a friend ,told me jews only care about money. i could go on but i think you get the point. btw none of these people were even slightly religious.

  • 251. 0 0
    Proud Zionist
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:35

    I'm sticking by statement. I find it impressive when a self appointed enlightened person is knocked down a few pegs.

  • 250. 0 0
    236 ad
    • EVELYN-THE CHRISTIAN ZIONIST
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:34

    you might want to re-phrase your question,,,,, why on earth did Arafat unleash intifadah #2 with no planes and tanks? (negotiation might have been nice) Palestinians dont get it both ways.....first they launch int #2, then they cry when it did not work for them---------and the best part is, people like you eat it all up-- hook, line and sinker !

  • 249. 0 0
    Mbrandi #238
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:32

    "jews too lived in israel through the ages btw." I know. I never denied that fact. Actually, it's one of the basic arguments I use when defending Israel to Arabs, in the hope that they will understand that the link Judaism-Israel has always been a continuous one (at least from our perspective). Some accept the concept, others don't. you wrote: "sorry but "your land" can be land conquered,land purchased,land won" Don't deny that either... I would personally feel a strong moral duty towards those that were there before though. Giving them their own state, if they so desire, would be the minimum... Finally were starting to agree on a few things. That's always nice. Yair PS. Even if Jews have had a continuous presence in Palestine, this was so in very small numbers from the 2nd century AD to the late 1800s. That means that I think I can correctly qualify the Palestinians, as "those that were there before". Even if many are descendants of immigrants as well, they have a much higher percentage of direct ancestors from Palestine than we do. By the way, I'm in no way trying to deny Israel's right to exist. I'm just trying to balance the discussion a bit.

  • 248. 0 0
    #236
    • alan-the rabid zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:29

    if you knew some history about the conflict, you would not have posted such garbage. do some homework ! if your too lazy: WWW.SHOEBAT.COM

  • 247. 0 0
    Michelle and Sarah and Yaakov
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:27

    Michelle, I don't know if I would call my obliteration of Sarah from Nowhere "impressive." Like all Israel haters, her hatred forces her to take ridiculous positions and therefore "debating" her is like taking candy from a baby:) Exposing Yaakov self-hater Sullivan is even easier, and his anger at being exposed makes it worth it.

  • 246. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:25

    I suggest you are quite young and have never personally experienced anti semitism. I may appear nationalistic but I most certainly do have sympathy for the displaced palestinians. But their obscene methods,death cult,rhetoric,teachings,acts have hardened my heart and I simply do not trust them. furthermore,the other arab states are beneath contempt for their treatment of their "brothers"and useage of them for their own agendas. the simple fact is that jews have nowhere else to go if need be.and for europe that need seems to be fast approaching.

  • 245. 0 0
    The Truth about Yaakov Sullivan
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:24

    "Really, PZ, Ronnie does not owe you an apology." Mind your business. When it is time for me to address you, you will see the words "self-hater" or "anti-Semite." Until then, MYOB. Sadly, you have taken advantage of Ronnie's good heart and naivety, he doesn't realize that you hate Israel and the Jews who live in it and that you spend hours criticizing Israel at a time when she desperately needs the world's support. "He simply realisies that in your worldview, any criticism of Israel or her abuse of power, is not synonymous with anti-Semitism, self hatred, or 'tearing Israel down'." Not true. As an actual citizen here, I criticize Israel on a daily basis. First, and you certainly couldn't understand this as a yored who failed here, there is a difference between criticizing Israel within Israel in Hebrew (as I often do) and criticizing Israel internationally. One helps Israel, one is often used by Israel's enemies during a time of terror and war. I've had many interesting debates with posters like Danite or others like Mark today, without calling them self-haters or anti-Semites. Because they aren't. You are though, so I call a spade a spade. Why do you spend so much time debating this point unless you realize that I (and the many others who say it) have a strong point? "For you, simply put, Israel can do no wrong. This is nonsense." Wrong. Israel can do wrong, but overall she is just and has a just case. "As for my constantly making excuses for the palestinians, this is nonsense which cannot be substantiated." -You claim that you cannot support Israel because of her "occupation," yet you do support the Palestinians despite the Palestinians four year terror war. -In an earlier post, you called terrorists "rejectionists." This is the language of a terror apologist or enemy. Which are you? ANSWER THIS, PLEASE (you keep ignoring this point) -You constantly judge Israel on a moral basis, yet when you were asked why the Ps rejected the '48 partition plan, you blithely replied "they had nothing to lose." Oh, well in that case, I guess it's ok that Israel lost 1 percent of its population in that war of attempted genocide!!! -You claim Israel "milks" the Holocaust. Again, this is the language of anti-Semites. -You believe Arafat's account of Camp David as opposed to Barak's or Clinton's or Ross' or Prince Bandar's. Why? Because you ALWAYS side against Israel. Most damningly: you signed a petition to divest ONLY from Israel during the time when the Palestinians were launching a brutal war and we desperately needed support. Not against the Sudan and their genocide, not against North Korea. This was an attempt to demonize and isolate Israel alone among the nations. Tell me, why didn't this great divestment pass? Why did almost all prominent figures renege in the end? If you are so proud of it, how do you feel about the head of Harvard exposing it as anti-Semitism? You also supported the AUT academic boycott (even though it would have mostly affected leftwing Israel profs), because you want Israel to be an isolated pariah. You hate us, becuase you hate yourself. Sad, but true. You are a sad, bitter, hateful old man who will never beat us. You weren't even tough enough to make it here, how could you ever beat us? All the self-hatred in the world won't help you, and you desperately need help. Why did you convert if you despise Jews and Zionism (or did that come after conversion?).

  • 244. 0 0
    I agree, Jacob Blues #199
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:24

    I certainly do not disagree with that assessment, Jacob. I am not justifying nor am I excusing this phenomenon. And by referring to context, I do not intend to do so. Yet context is critical. By that I mean that these suicide bombers are coming out of a certain context. You will generally find these disgruntled youth alienated from their parent cultures, very tempted by Western culture and yet feeling intimidated by it and cut off from access to its channels of social mobility. Yet this applies to many youth but not all of them make these horrendous decisions to turn themselves into human bombs. They feel utterly misplaced by the wrenching effects of globalisation and angry that they cannot capture the glories of an Islamic past. Their actions have far more to do with revenge than with frustration. Islam must confront this as I have stated before. It must deal with this "context", more so than the West. Policy does play a role here. This is not to say that if policy were to change 360 degrees all terror would stop. If this pool of alienated, unmoored youth desires change of foreign policy or a more concerted effort to achieve integration, then they must do so by utilising the political process. Shut down the tube rather than blowing it up, leading an antiwar movement, doing their utmost to change foreign policy. To employ methods that they accuse the US and British government of employing against Muslim peoples is disingenuous and betrays their intentions.

  • 243. 0 0
    No comment
    • RoyS
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:19

    Livingstone: "The Likud and Hamas members are two sides of the same coin. ... Each side emphasizes the extremism of the other in order to attract sympathy" Sharon: "Extremists are attempting to take over the Likud from within" (Source: Haaretz / Israel Radio, 25-Jul-05)

  • 242. 0 0
    The air must be very think in San Francisco
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:18

    Where do you suppose the rabid militants in Palestine are getting their rockets....Santa Claus? The tooth fairy? The Easter Bunny? Hard to feel sorry for a people who target women and children Ad.

  • 241. 0 0
    Very impressive Proud Zionist
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:15

    You slamed the door on Sarah and rightfully so!

  • 240. 0 0
    question to Murillo
    • Alex
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:14

    Murillo, what's your ethnic background ? Also, what's all this stupid infatuation with the Ashkenazi Jews ?

  • 239. 0 0
    Khalil 206
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:13

    Khalil, is Pape your new prophet? I see his name all over the place.

  • 238. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:12

    sorry but "your land"can be land conquered,land purchased,land won.jews too lived in israel through the ages btw. i the grandchild of european immigrants live on former indian land conquered by spain won (don't even know)by mexico and conquered by usa that I bought.

  • 237. 0 0
    ahmad
    • Alex
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:11

    Comparing Hamas the organization of fanatics, racists & murderers to Mother Teresa ? Ahmad, have you smoked too much hashish ? Regardless of your mean rants, it is Hamas that is on a terrorist group list, listed as such by both European Union and USA.

  • 236. 0 0
    How SHOULD they fight back then?
    • ad
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:10

    One quote from the mayor stuck me "Given that the Palestinians don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons,". That is a good point. The US did not give the palestinians billions of dollars in free jets, tanks, and even -nuclear weapons-. What should they fight back with? What do the rabid zionists in this forum think about that? You can't expect any people to just give up and become repressed third class citizens at best, or at worst, be completely pushed out of their homes.

  • 235. 0 0
    Khalil....I prefer to get my answer now
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:07

    If you can't or won't answer my question, then I will ask someone else.

  • 234. 0 0
    Sarah from Nowhere
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:06

    Sarah from Nowhere, "Israel is also under the lens and thus far Sharon is not fairing any better than Hamas." What a load of horse puckey. The world sees that Sharon is making a major move for peace and is treating him accordingly, while Hamas is vilified. Sharon is going to France to meet with Chirac (and Chirac has made it known in advance that he wants a friendly visit), while the world rightfully shuns Hamas (even Abu Mazen threatens them and was fighting with them in the streets). "BTW, displaying personal information of others (cyber outing) whether true or not have no place here. They have nothing to do with the discussion and only show the perveyor of such games for what they are--devoid of any real moral or ethical stance. In other words they are children playing the school yard bully. Real solutions will have to come from the adults, these bullying children are not capable." You aren't the moderator, but maybe you dream of being the moderator. Johanes Franzen moderates a discussion group that debated the existence of the Holocaust. That is pertinent info., it shows EXACTLY where he is coming from (just as finding out that a poster on a discussion about race relations was in the Klu Klux Klan would be relevant). Yaakov Sullivan signed a petition solely demonizing Israel and urging a financial strangulation of this country. Again, pertinent. If you don't like the heat, stay out of the kitchen, Nowhere.

  • 233. 0 0
    You deserve nothing of the sort #179
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:03

    Really, PZ, Ronnie does not owe you an apology. He simply realisies that in your worldview, any criticism of Israel or her abuse of power, is not synonymous with anti-Semitism, self hatred, or "tearing Israel down". For you, simply put, Israel can do no wrong. This is nonsense. As for my constantly making excuses for the palestinians, this is nonsense which cannot be substantiated. Again, I state that yes I did sign the divestment petition which referred to companies selling or manufacturing arms used in Israel's occupation. So I suggest you cool your tirades. They are ineffectual. Further, if you expect people to believe you when you allege that you support a two state solution, then I would advise you to do something to help bring about an end to Israel's expansionism and comittment to ongoing development in the West Bank after assuring the Bush administration that they would refrain from doing so.

  • 232. 0 0
    Sharon Slams London's Mayor
    • Norm Freedman
    • 25.07.05
    • 21:00

    First the good news. 1.Since the year 1215 the position of Lord Mayor has been an elected position 2.Mayor Livingstone is the mayor only until September. 3.The term for Mayor is limited to 1 year The bad news 2.Like minded Londoners elected him.

  • 231. 0 0
    Paul Harris #227
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:59

    "what you need is to know what a bomb exploding by you feels like; before being a philospher at large" Several of my family members were murdered and raped in the Arabic world for being Jewish. I was threatened to death with a knife on my throat. Will you allow me to have an opinion? Oh go on, please... I know it's not as good as a bomb, but I hope I'm entitled to think independently now. To all those that haven't had traumatic anti-semitic experiences yet, just slavishly follow your leaders! You're too naive to think for yourself...! Ugggh, disgusting...

  • 230. 0 0
    Michelle # 218 and JB # 219
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:58

    re # 218 easy reading go to amconmag.com then come back rather opining new subject after that will give you answer. re # 219 are you prof. in math? go against him in your courts in USA and you may make $$$$$$$$ out from IT IF YOU CAN if not come see me !!!!

  • 229. 0 0
    London and Ken, a perfect match
    • DeeDee
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:57

    If Londoners elected Ken, they deserve what they got. They can go on priding themselves of being a special society where radical muslim preachers are allowed to churn out mouthfuls of vitriolic poison while cool Londoners go to sip tea and eat cucumber sandwiches. Lets see how long it will take the natives to acknowledge the existence of a fifth column that is growing from within, born, raised and educated in the UK. This is only the beginning, London will never be the same. I know that Ken's unwise remarks will come back to haunt him.

  • 228. 0 0
    Yairtje
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:47

    Yair, good for you that you do this alone. How old are you? I guess you will have to serve in the army? You know what they say, don't you? Tel Aviv is the place to enjoy, Haifa is the place to work and Jerusalem is the place to pray. For me, there is no city like Jerusalem. I like many parts of Israel, but I am always very glad to be home. Hoewel ik dan nog niet zo oud ben, een oplossing voor dit conflict maak ik niet meer mee. Tulip

  • 227. 0 0
    #222 tity uniqye never fights with younger sister
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:30

    tity , you fall into the same trap as doris , you start a fight with someone you dont know. get out and live and come back in twenty years and tell someone what you have learnt. what you need is to know what a bomb exploding by you feels like; before being a philospher at large

  • 226. 0 0
  • 225. 0 0
    Jews are being forced from there homes in Gaza....
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:26

    We all know Jews are being forced from there homes in Gaza, but I was just informed that any live stock they may have can't be taken with them. Is this true....does anyone know?

  • 224. 0 0
    Sharon is a war criminal
    • Fahd
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:23

    Way more innocent civilians have died on Sharon's orders then by anyone in Hamas. Talk about murderous.

  • 223. 0 0
    Fair
    • Mike
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:23

    Of course the double standard is fair. When many muslims (and I do not see any on this website saying anything to the contrary) believe that their religion is superior, why would they allow infidels practice another religion in their midst and become contaminated? And since their religion is superior, they of course should be allowed to practice freely in the West. Don't you understand, it is their mission to convert the infidel world to Islam? That is what Jihad is all about.

  • 222. 0 0
    Paul Harris u dont have a clue!
    • Tity
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:18

    Paul Harris u have no clue... for your info im not an only child...i have an 1.5 year younger sister but im not here in this forum to discuss my family matters. We have a big family with loads of relatives with my first cousins in Greece and all my secong cousins in Boston US, London, UK and all over Israel. You keep rumbling and making awful jokes and funny...id say its you who talks out of no experience or knowledge! At least i have it fresh on my mind from my extensive MA research at uni.... but im not here to debate with you...a person who tries to find if im an only child or not. But ill consider you for a psychoanalysis...;)

  • 221. 0 0
    Ridge #209 about Tity
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:18

    You wrote: "Instead of pouring out all this vitriol in these forums, why don`t you come to the region and check out what is going on for yourself?" I believe she's going there in a couple of days...

  • 220. 0 0
    #212 Shimon
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:15

    You wrote: "Besides, i do not only side with Israel, i personally dont think we should leave gaza because all it will do is breed more and more terrorism and it will set a president to give up land to terrorists monsters while they shoot at us...and giving up land they never deserved or had a claim on mind you". This is not siding with Israel? Then what is? Please, Shimon, be a bit more realistic. Second, your conclusion that I side with the Palestinians is totally wrong. I side with no ethnicity. I look at every case individually and then try to make up my mind objectively, without being too much influenced by my background (at least I try). Third, after getting involved in Arab life, I found out that a lot of the things I was taught by the Jews and their media was rubbish as well. I certainly believe that the Israeli press is more neutral than its Palestinian equivalent, no conflict there. But listen to your own comments; then go and live with an Arabic family for a while (which I did, by the way); experience the lifestyle for at least a few months or so, and you will see that things aren't as black and white as you think they are. Takes an open mind though... Should give it a try!

  • 219. 0 0
    Forget Prof. Pape's conclusions, he should lose his PhD due to lack of arithmatic skills
    • Jacob Blues
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:11

    http://www.amperspective.com/html/chicago_prof_.html Prof Pape stated the following "The leading instigator of suicide attacks is the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, a Marxist-Leninist group whose members are from Hindu families but who are adamantly opposed to religion. This group committed 76 of the 315 incidents, more than Hamas (54) or Islamic Jihad (27)." Last time I checked, 54+27 = 81. Not only does he exclude the Al-Aqsa brigades, but seems to only count completed suicide attacks, not inderdicted ones. But putting aside his lack of math skills, he attempts to whitewash the use of Islam and religion as part of the support network for terrorism. Religious leaders, as part of the wider community have provided these attacks with social legitimacy. Bombers are given the title of Shaheed, martyr. Divine rewards are recounted, sermons are given in their honor. More earthly rewards in the form of cash and pedestal status are

  • 218. 0 0
    Khalil
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:07

    Being that I haven't read that book and don't even own it, perhaps you could answer my question anyway. Why are Western countries allowing Middle Eastern Muslims to immigrate to our countries, when we are not allowed to immigrate to yours. I'd appreciate an answer and I'm not looking for a fight either. Just an honest answer.

  • 217. 0 0
    DEBORAH
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:04

    sorry.. the muslims DEMAND to have freedom in US, Canada, France, Englad..Demand to wear their head scarves, yet it is ok for all muslim countries to make Catholicism, protestantism, judiasm ILLEGAL. WE must let them pray to Allah, but we go to jail in their countries. And you are asking IS IT FAIR? They do not recognize fair? They do not understand it.

  • 216. 0 0
    Michelle -Ahmad
    • Deborah
    • 25.07.05
    • 20:00

    Michelle, you waste your breadth here. Go see the web site they recommend. He can't have an open mind. Ofcourse the Muslims DEMAND

  • 215. 0 0
    Now I get it
    • deborah
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:58

    Please everyone, read that site ifamericaknew.com..then you will understand why Dutch, Franzen et al say the things they do. Did you know, there was no fighting for 2000 years in Palestine!!! Only the Zionists who decided to show up cause this peacful..ARE YOU PEPOLE REALLY THIS STUPID? No Roman wars, no Islamic wars, no HISTORY at all?? The trash on this site is so horrid it is comical. No Holocoust- well we know Abbas says that too. We must feel sorry, this is what our canadian friend listens to also. I thought you people went to better schools and at least took basic world history. Jerusalem had not been at peace for 2000 years. Hence the DESTRUCTIONS of the temple???!!! You can't reason with people who are so full of misinformation. These debates are to superficial because their entire premise is based on bull...t.

  • 214. 0 0
    Proud Zionist on brothers in and with arms
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:56

    PZ: I realize you aren`t smart, but wake up and join your brothers, Ronnie. I`m here everyday living this and having to deal with it, while you snipe at me from the comfort of Canada. This is a game to you, it`s life to me. What gives you the right to criticize me? You owe me an apology for doing what you are too dumb to do: defending Israel from those who hate her.... PZ,I defend Israel consistently against what I see are bad things said about it. Against Ken Livingstone,Against the Terrorists,Against the Left Intellectuals like Martillo and also against the Right wing Jewish extremists. You allow them to say things against moderation,I dont. Our loyalties are different. Just like I say to the moderate muslims,seperate yourselves from the fundamentalist killers,I say to the moderate Jews,seperate yourself from the extreme elements.Its not the same but the concept is the same. Fundamentalist dreams ultimately kill. Whether by the hand itelf or the mind,they kill. With Israel and its control of the Status Quo,and the fact that the Palestinians shoot themselves in the foot often,the right wing only need to go to the extreme they go too,but I wonder for the future. Today Haaretz said that some want to kill themselves..thats not so far from the next step.

  • 213. 0 0
    Anything to change the subject
    • Sarah from Somewhere
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:53

    What a load of manure being spread around today. While you worry about lambasting Ken Livingstone and Yaacov or anyone else who has a differing opinion, you do not have to take self responsibility. Keep going, the world is watching you play a mini game of Sharon style one-up-manship. Your chance is now for peace and what happens? While Israel/Palestine burns, you keep playing the fiddle. Those who are of good heart need to step forward. Those who only want to twart and abuse need to be ignored. You have much to loose by playing this game. Two players that are important are Palestinians and Israelis. Ken Livingstone is merely a distraction. Do not allow distraction to stop the chance both peoples have to enjoy a little peace. The world grows tired of the conflict and if this fails, it will not be only Palestinians who lose. Israel is also under the lens and thus far Sharon is not fairing any better than Hamas. BTW, displaying personal information of others (cyber outing) whether true or not have no place here. They have nothing to do with the discussion and only show the perveyor of such games for what they are--devoid of any real moral or ethical stance. In other words they are children playing the school yard bully. Real solutions will have to come from the adults, these bullying children are not capable.

  • 212. 0 0
    yair - the problem
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:44

    The problem isnt that you dont side with israel, its who you side with instead. When u beliveve the lies fed to you by the arabs and refuse to beleiev what the IDF says is REALLY happeneing, when you side with murderers whose only goal is to kill as many of YOUR people, women and children too, instead of siding with Jews who would do no such thing, THAT is the problem. Besides, i do not only side with Israel, i personally dont think we should leave gaza because all it will do is breed more and more terrorism and it will set a president to give up land to terrorists monsters while they shoot at us...and giving up land they never deserved or had a claim on mind you.

  • 211. 0 0
    Michelle # 207 RE AHMAD
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:44

    michelle, why wasting our time, your time and Ahmads time, please read my comment # 206 above and come back please with real comments.

  • 210. 0 0
    responce to dorris
    • Michael Cohen
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:39

    dorris have you discovered some new kind of quntam pcyisics

  • 209. 0 0
    Enough, Tity!
    • Ridge
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:38

    Instead of pouring out all this vitriol in these forums, why don't you come to the region and check out what is going on for yourself? Maybe make up your own mind instead of relying on the biased media?

  • 208. 0 0
    Proud Zionist
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:37

    "The IDF have to stay strong against the protesters." Such comments are very easy from Canada. It isn`t your son or daughter being called "Nazi"... Its funny I thought we are all sitting by computers in the line of fire and not on the ground......or the 'street'. But surely I would see the ground AND the 'street' when I am there. Maybe,the police will have a hard time deciding what to do with me.I am a humanitarian and a pro-israeli.

  • 207. 0 0
    Ahmad please answer my question
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:30

    You state that Westerner's and Western countries are targeted because we are in your land right? Now, why are Westerner's supposed to welcome Muslims into their lands? Muslims from the middle east move to the United States and get to freely worship whom they please....but if I were to ever come to Muslim land, I am not allowed to worship as I please. Double standards are ingrained in your thought process Ahmad.

  • 206. 0 0
    TO 198 & 199 JB, PLEASAE READ MORE
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:28

    jb, What about reading something new,correct, since and acad."Diying to Win" by Prof Robert Pape. Do some work rather using bankrupt Fareed Zak.

  • 205. 0 0
    #192 Bloemfontein; also for mbrandi and shimon
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:26

    Thank you! You're totally right with what you imply. This forum scares the hell out of me! You can't criticise Israel on anything without getting an avalanche of nationalistic hawks on your back! It's so scary: you're either anti-semitic, or in my case, a self-hating Jew. Ridiculous! The worst thing is that they don't realise how blinded they are by nationalism. You can't criticise your own people/government/country without being a traitor. This totally uncritical attitude has caused the world some much damage, and even more so to the Jews. And now these people do exactly the same thing: just follow the country! Don't criticise, don't analyse, whatever your country does is correct! Horrible! I expected much more from educated people: what a disillusion! Nobody's responsible for the acts of their government, people or ancestors; only for your own... So why be afraid to criticise? I don't become less Jewish for criticising Israel, I feel I become more Jewish. We have a long history of debating and critical thought, currently unfortunately heavily undermined by these people. My love for Judaism is one of the two reasons I act (the other one is sympathy with the Palestinian plight): I don't want my culture to rot away in the claws of nationalism. It deserves better than that. A proud Jew.

  • 204. 0 0
    Ronnie's strength
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:21

    "The IDF have to stay strong against the protesters." Such comments are very easy from Canada. It isn't your son or daughter being called "Nazi"...

  • 203. 0 0
    Hey Tulpje
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:16

    I sent you a message on another forum, but I think it's been closed, so I resend it: Altijd gezellig om even met jou bij te kletsen... 37 is NIET oud. I insist: I know many very vivid 37 year olds, and you still have a looooooong way to go before being classified as a senior citizen. About making Aliyah: no, my father isn`t Jewish (I`m a mother-Jew!), so he`s not going anywhere. He`s living with his girlfriend now, and we (my sister and I) don`t get to see him much because of the new `familiar` situation. Maybe when things become more settled we`ll restore contact, who knows... So, nop, going to Jerusalem on my own. My sister is very supportive (although she`s not moving anywhere either), but will be with me mentally. It is a bit scary, such a move on one`s own, but I have a few friends over there, and it`s all quite an interesting adventure. Do you like living in Jerusalem? How has the experience been? A hug, Yair

  • 202. 0 0
    Proud Zionist about Hamas and the moral ground we walk on
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:15

    The last time you decided to test me you ended up saying you believe Hamas needs to keep its weapons because Israel has the "status quo." Am I right or wrong? Yes you are right I said that and stand by it.You have made several points,and I will answer them with the peanut brain that you suggest later,meanwhile have to do some work,its difficult being so stupid in my position. I stand by the above because I told you time and time again the answer,not that you,the arrogant,would mention it,or even listen. Again: I said that Hamas had joined the political realm and that because they were the pick of many of the Palestinian people (for reasons of their being treated well by them) that they should keep their weapons,and that could make them the defacto army because the Palestinians didnt trust the PA and their corruption.In any case the weapons would give them the choice I said. I actually thought that choice would have been used or not used AFTER Sharon left Gaza but infact they used it before,so I suggested targeted killing as the appropriate answer. I also think that Hamas cannot be a negotiating parnter based on their decision to condone Jihads bombing of Netanya and also the rocket that killed the lady in Israel. I also feel that arabs have not been treated too well in Israel.Ive heard yes that they are treated better in israel than in other arab cointries and there are a lot of issues as how they relate to the Palestinians but when somebody says we should leave Gaza and then CARPET BOMB IT and you say nothing,Im pretty disgusted too with that. And you are sarcastic to Yaakov. Yaakov says that Jews milk the holocaust.Thats wrong for him to magnify that point when so many people have suffered,but its not a lie.Every charity magnifies and merchandises their product,not getting emotion for the sake of it but for donations.So there is some truth to what he says.I dont condone that though. As a reservist for Israel I dont castigate you,I just dont like your arrogance and selectivity when it comes to your centre right position that often plays itself as right wing. Regading Paul Harris and the Holocaust situation,I think that you backed the Sharon government against the Orange (probably back the government against anything) but you rarely talk out against Israel practices that are wrong.I do if I feel they are wrong,Yaakov does. I will say what I think is the truth and stand by it in the face of your blind loyalty. If that makes me dumb.Ok.

  • 201. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone is the real terrorist
    • Danny
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:11

    Ken "Muhammed" Livingstone is the real deal, as far as terrorist sympathising, aiding and abetting is concerned. He let over 1 million Muslims into his city and turned it into a terrorist hotbed almost overnight. He continues to support and encourage Palestinian terrorists, and even shows sympathy and understanding for Al-Qaeda. The United States should declare this terrorist sympathiser a persona non grata. Other states are sure to follow suit. I hope Brittons wake up and send him to be mayor of Gaza city, where he belongs. I'm sorry Sharon even wasted breath on this worm.

  • 200. 0 0
    Moder
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 19:06

    "At the current rate of expansion, the Palestinians would probably be wiped out by 2050." Now see, that's what I hear about the Europeans living in Europe. By 2050, Europe could be run by Muslims.

  • 199. 0 0
    Yaacov, another source of "context" #97
    • Jacob Blues
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:58

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8683395/site/newsweek/ How to Stop the Contagion This is battle, not an academic seminar. We in the West have to discredit, delegitimize and dismantle barbaric ideas. By Fareed Zakaria Newsweek Aug. 1 issue - If you want to understand what motivates suicide bombers, watch the recent movie "Downfall." Based on eyewitness accounts, it chronicles the final days inside Hitler's bunker. In a particularly harrowing scene, Joseph Goebbels and his wife are given the opportunity to have their six young children flee to safety. But Magda Goebbels refuses and instead drugs the kids to sleep. Then she inserts a cyanide capsule into each child's mouth and presses the jaws until the capsule breaks. When explaining why she won't allow her kids to escape, Mrs. Goebbels explains, "I can't bear to think of them growing up in a world without national socialism." This is the power of ideology. Magda Goebbels had embraced a horrific world view that made her believe that murdering her children was a noble act. Suicide bombing cannot be explained by poverty and disadvantage. The London bombers were not the wretched of the earth. They came from working-class but comfortable backgrounds, living in one of the world's most prosperous countries. For all the talk of their being marginalized, none were living in hellish ghettos. Britain today does a decent job of assimilating its immigrants, certainly better than any other European country. If anyone had cause for rage, it was not the bombers but their parents. Muslim migrants from Pakistan (in three cases), they arrived in Britain in less multicultural times. They were dirt-poor and probably ostracized and persecuted. And yet they did not become murderers; they started fish-and-chips shops. Like all ideologies, radical Islam is a phenomenon of the educated class. From Muhammad Atta to Mohammed Sidique Khan, almost all suicide bombers have been men who read and write. In V. S. Naipaul's book "A Million Mutinies Now," the author interviews a young Hindu fanatic. The man explains his fascistic views, and then Naipaul asks the man's father, who happens to be sitting there, what he thinks. The old man explains that he works at a factory from morning till night and doesn't really have time for these kinds of ideas. Extremist ideology is a leisure-time pursuit. (go to Newsweek for the full article).

  • 198. 0 0
    What's the context Yaacov? #97
    • Jacob Blues
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:57

    They tried to blow up the world trade center in 1993 during the years of the Madrid conference and early work of Oslo. This is also after the US saved Kuwait from Saddam's invasion. They bombed the Khobar Towers in 1996. This is while NATO troops are trying to stop Serbs from killing Muslims in the former Yugoslavia. They bombed two US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 They bombed the USS Cole in 2000. Just what context do you see here. Ken Livingstone, just like all the other hate-mongers isn't looking for context, he's looking for a scapegoat.

  • 197. 0 0
    Avram
    • Michelle
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:56

    I believe you are correct when you said that Livington has now given the radical element within his Muslim community the token to act in fulfilling the goals they have for England. When terrorists start to be hunted down like the dogs they are in England, Livingston should be on that list!

  • 196. 0 0
    Mbrandi #189
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:56

    You write: "if you saw people coming into your land"...how about the British?the Ottomans?" That's so obviously analitically different, that I can't believe you actually raise it! Neither the Brits nor the Ottomans had the intention to displace the local population with their own: they were "colonial powers" that ruled the country from outside, but without upsetting the internal demographic situation. They were in no way a threat in the way that the Jews were. The difference is comparable to the difference between, say, Sierra Leone and the US. In Sierra Leone the British were never a threat: they just ruled the country and, by and large, left the population get on with their lives. In the US, British (and other) settlers made a clear effort to uproot the local population, take their land, and make it theirs. The fact that the Arabs living in historical Palestine did not oppose the Ottoman or the Brits as they did with the incoming Jewish population is so logical that I can't believe you can't see it. The term "your land" here is not a term of ownership. Ownership in those days depended on military power, not on any moral considerations. Saying that it wasn't morally their land because they didn't have the arms to confront their coloniser is a bit fascist. Maybe they didn't even want to: sometimes surprisingly a native population can prefer staying under foreign domination, because they prefer into to an indigenous dictatorship. However, recognising this right to CHOOSE, is implicitly recognising that therefore it is their land. "Your land", then, in my conceptual nomenclature refers to the land you cultivate, where you're born and raised.

  • 195. 0 0
    Ronnie on Martillo
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:51

    Hey Ronnie, I was already awake on 13.15 as you can see. I never thought I would get history lesson again, but instead of grabbing deepdown my dusty encyclopedia, I am following dr. Martillo's class.

  • 194. 0 0
    #191 brother :is cohen wrong it must be bad wine .
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:47

    dear chen , the last time i looked i did not see on the likud manifesto that all arabs should be swept out of the middle eastand a jewish fundamental state declared ??? as i said before logic lessons should be taken frequently by both brothers . hamas and its aims are well known and need no introduction

  • 193. 0 0
    Also the Pope in Rome today said ???
    • Khalil
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:47

    More and more and more, not only London Mayor but also PROF. Robert Pape and today the Pope in Rome. So what and who is next? My be Bush,.. etc and the last one to understand is Sharon!!!

  • 192. 0 0
    Israel is perfect
    • Bloemfontein
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:34

    Israel is a sacred nation. No one on Earth has the right to criticize it. It is the most perfect democracy in the world, the most perfect state too. Whoever dares to criticize Israel is a racist, terrorist and a Nazi, he is a criminal against humanity and deserves to be sued at the ICJ. All what Israel is doing is good. It has nuclear weapons in order to defend itself against the world, it has tanks and aircrafts that kill Arab children, in order for it to protect Israeli children, and it threatens to destroy the Iranian nuclear infrastructure for the good of humanity (and poison life in all the region by doing so), but it's Israel. Worse than that : he who criticizes Israel is an anti-semit, and this is the worst crime that could be imagined in this world.

  • 191. 0 0
    ken is no diplomat, but he's right
    • the cohen brother
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:34

    israel, especially under the likud and hamas have been doing the same things, using different methods. israel campaign of terror is state run, assisted by settler militias, hamas's is locally run, assisted by kids who are willing to blow themselves up. israel uses missles, state of the art military jets to shoot at crowded refugee camps, hamas uses willing humans to murder civilians, since they don't have f15's. red ken is saying the ugly, inconvenient truth, whcih the israelis don't want to hear, having lived in denial for 38 years.

  • 190. 0 0
    joachim
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:31

    now jews were/are part of a right wing conspiracy. I thought you said left wing before?

  • 189. 0 0
    yair
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:29

    "if you saw people coming into your land"...how about the British?the Ottomans? "your land"?

  • 188. 0 0
    To Dan
    • Eric
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:20

    While Livingstone was entirely on the wrong track, the wrongness of his track was in evaluation of the data, as opposed to the technique. Where he went wrong, was assuming that the best way to deal with the imbalance was to ?correct? it. It is in fact, quite correct as is. The reason the Moslems use terrorism, is that they do not have Fighter Jets and Tanks and Nuclear Missiles on par with our own. If they had these, they would use them instead. The Jihad that Mohammed calls his followers to, is a generic war intent on establishing Global Islamic Rule, more interested in obtaining dominance over the ?Non-Believers?, in some cases called ?Infidels?, as opposed to converting them. Prolonged Dhimmitude is there, on the shelf, for Christians who accept such slavery. That option is closed to the rest of Dar Al-Harb, for which eventual extermination is called for. They are not guided by a notion of soul saving as Christians are or Proof by Survival as we are. They are guided singly and intensely, by pride. Just like some other ideologies that have shared this goal of global domination. The places where people like Livingstone go wrong, are many. His desire to balance middle eastern powers, it is like giving a gun to a man who is threatening you with a knife, when you could just give him the bullets, one at a time, at supersonic speeds. It is a perhaps willful and deliberate ignorance of motivations, motivations described in great detail, in the central doctrines, of the oldest threat, that Europe has resisted for centuries.

  • 187. 0 0
    #98 Ahmed
    • alan
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:18

    thanks for the link. What you fail to realize that many of these links have skewed data. Many actually report collaborators that were killed by hamas, honour killings, etc. so i dont hold too much respect with this link. Furthermore, ALL these deaths on both sides are due to your great leader Arafat who launched int #2 since you like to post links; WWW.SHOEBAT.COM

  • 186. 0 0
    Ken has courage
    • Anthony
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:17

    It is high time that someone had the courage to speak out. Unfortunately anti-semitism still exists in this world (as do many other ignorant expressions of hatred based on fear of difference), but Ken Livingstone's statement is not representative of this and to keep using that term incorrectly is damaging. Many people who find anti-semitism abhorrant agree with the Mayor. Perhaps it is time to really examine how Palestinians have been treated and then ask who is the true victim of hate crimes?

  • 185. 0 0
    Harel,the IDF and the Protesters
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:14

    HAARETZ NEWS: Israel Defense Forces GOC Southern Command Dan Harel leveled harsh criticism at protestors on Monday whom he said are waging psychological warfare against soldiers in the field. "Intensive psychological warfare is being waged in an attempt to break the soldiers," Harel told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. "Many people from all sectors of the population are taking part in this effort. There is a serious crossing of red lines when calling soldiers 'Judenrat' and 'Nazis.'" Harel said that soldiers were being brought to tears but nevertheless said the protestors "must have no doubts about the ability of the IDF to stand strong." The IDF have to stay strong against the protesters. We have heard from so many right wing extremists about not using the Holocaust as a relative subject when discussing anything else and now see that point as being gamesmanship rather than morality because here its being brought out to its fullest in the resettling of the Orange. And from what I understand there is not to be a concentration camp made by the government is there? I think its a development of sorts,nice houses even... They are tricky those right wingers,using whatever it takes and even threatening suicide. Yeah right.

  • 184. 0 0
    A DAY IN THE LIFE OF DUTCH
    • Marco
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:13

    a day in the life of dutch according to the haaretz forum... "Leon Rosgarten, great letter...thanks so much" "Franzen, keep on those zionists...thanks so much" "Tity, I really do not like that Harris fellow, too narrow minded, thank you"

  • 183. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • dick
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:12

    Well Red Ken along with Galloway have British blood on their hands! He did it! He condoned! The British people put this scum into office, let them reap the results!

  • 182. 0 0
    #143 doris strikes balance for the arabs red ken incorrect
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:12

    doris with you rooting fot the arabs how can they fail!!! have you got some drawings of the land thta is being appropiated all the time . i find thta no one contributing to these columns as an exponent of anti semitism , is able to do arithmetic. ISRAEL KEEPS STEALING LAND BUT ENDS UP WITH LESS ALL OF THE TIME. TELL ME HOW ITS DONE AND ILL APPLY THE FORMULA TO MY BANK ACCOUNT NOW IN 1922 THE JEWS HAD 100% AND NOW THEY ONLY HAVE 5% OF THAT LAND . DORIS CSDIGAN FINDS NEW LAWS OF MATHEMATICS THE MORE YOU GET THE LESS YOU HAVE INCREDIBLE

  • 181. 0 0
    ahmed
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:01

    if american knew is a disgraceful website run by a holocaust denier.shame on you. how are jews supposed to even begin to talk to you?

  • 180. 0 0
    First they came for...
    • Eric
    • 25.07.05
    • 18:00

    It is a real shame that Brazilian Electricians do not have tanks and fighter jets with which to defend themselves from British Socialists.

  • 179. 0 0
    Poor Ronnie (part II)
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:59

    "Cant rock the apple cart can we,PZ but smash Yaakov at any opportunity wont we?" Ronnie, you are endearingly dumb like a puppy. Your analysis never factors the fact that Israel is facing tremendous daily anti-Semitism. The U.N. has singled out Israel for ridiculous criticism (see the Durban conf, which turned into an Israel-bashing haven). Europe routinely holds us to a double standard (see the BBC). The Muslims use us Jews as an external enemy to distract from their own corruption. And yet you pillory me for defending Israel instead of joining those (like Yaakov) whose fondest wish is to dismantle her!!! Again, Yaakov supported a divestment against only one country in the entire world! This means he thought Israel is more of a pariah than North Korea, Saudi Arabia and the genociders of Sudan. I realize you aren't smart, but wake up and join your brothers, Ronnie. I'm here everyday living this and having to deal with it, while you snipe at me from the comfort of Canada. This is a game to you, it's life to me. What gives you the right to criticize me? You owe me an apology for doing what you are too dumb to do: defending Israel from those who hate her....

  • 178. 0 0
    Martillo and his movie of the week
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:59

    The Jews fought the Progrom Dictators with what they had,sometimes left and sometimes right and in America,land of the free, they fight through democracy and politik. You are free too,even here on Haaretz to speak your mind. Enjoy the comraderie,Joachim....you do like comraderie dont you Joachim????? JOACHIM?????? Hey are you watching Doctor Zhivago AGAIN??????????????

  • 177. 0 0
    Poor Ronnie (part I)
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:58

    Ronnie, You are a good guy with a nice heart, but you aren't exactly the brightest bulb. I leave you alone, but you always decide to tangle with me and come across looking silly. The last time you decided to test me you ended up saying you believe Hamas needs to keep its weapons because Israel has the "status quo." Am I right or wrong? Now you are back with more nonsense. Let's see: "Hey,Proud,I notice in most of your posts there is a lot about Yaakov and Red Ken but little about Sharon,the person that the article is about." The article is actually about Sharon's condemnation of Red Ken's outrageous comments. Sharon is reacting to Red Ken, as am I. What is your point? Yaakov, as is his wont, sided with a known hater of Israel. I criticized him for it (as is my wont). What is your point? Why would you side with a person (Yaakov) who said that Jews "milk" the Holocaust? Who signed a petition singling out Israel as the Jew among the nations (a divestment petition) during the height of the terror war? A person who daily comes to demonize Jewish Israelis when we desperately need world support? Ronnie, your moral relativism blinds you from seeing that unlike you, Yaakov has hate in his heart. Don't be too naive. "This is a common theme going through your posts. Always complaining about others relative to the content of the article but even more so not saying anything about Sharon tells me that you," Not sure what you are talking about. I always praise Sharon and say that I support disengagement and think he is a great leader. "Poud Zionist are afraid to say anything negative about any of your people...apart from the leftists that is......I mean Left Jews are not Jews are they,Proud Zionist?" Like many Israelis these days, I tend to be center right (there is a reason why Sharon is PM). Therefore, I often criticize the left. What is your point? I have also criticized the right, such as telling Paul Harris that it is innappropriate when Jews write Holocaust numbers on their arm in protest, etc. Never have I said that left wing Jews aren't Jews, in fact, I am married to one. It is clear to anyone with a brain, though, that Yaakov HATES Israel and Jews. He used to live here, failed, and now he devotes his entire day to trafficking with Israel's enemies and making life harder for Jews actually living here. "I mean you cannot like Karl Marx and Michael Lerner AND also Judaism even if the first kibbutzim were leftists,G-d forbid." You certainly can, and many do (your allegations are silly and baseless-as usual). But if you single out Israel among all nations as a pariah, you are an anti-Semite or self-hater. Simple. Yaakov does that. You don't. You are naive. He hates Jews and Israel. "But Sharon? Come on. You are sworn to him as Prime Minister and he is taking on the left,the Right AND the Palestinians and we cant say ANYTHING about him." As usual, your comments are about as intelligent as a three-year old's. I suport Sharon but also criticize. What I don't do, is call terrorists by the name "rejectionists" (Yaakov does that). What I don't do is say that I can't support the Israelis because of the "occupation" but I can support the Palestinians despite terror (which Yaakov does).

  • 176. 0 0
    yair
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:55

    One very common misconception in history is that Jews didnt live in israel until the 1920s. That is very very false. Jews had been there and people had a right to move in there. Anyone who decideds that peopl moving in is deserving of killing women and children is the REAL problem here and the only problem. I am glad you agree there is no excuse to start killing your neighbors..so we found the source of the violence....and guess what, it was BEFORE any made up occupation and ball of lies....makes you wonder doesnt it.

  • 175. 0 0
    Martillo is looking for a North-South war...
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:52

    Pointing his finger at Ashkenazis (they are not,repeat,not,aryans or nazis) Martillo is trying to convince us that we should send all our Ashkinazis back to Europe. May I remind him that he lives is Boston,home of the celts.They actually trekked from the Middle East in druid form to Ireland and subsequently some of them found home in Boston. send them back to the middle east maybe in exchange for the Ashkenazis? of the northern Turks? or northern pakistani/Indians? Joachim Martillo,that doesnt sound an Gaelic name,why do you reside in Boston? Maybe Mexico City would be more apropos or HOW ABOUT CUBA with the inFidel himself Castro?

  • 174. 0 0
    m from naples
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:46

    how do you think palestinians will live after they are in a palestine?maybe like in cairo? will they still be day laborers in Israel? what magic is going to transform the average joe out of a slum?do you think it will be democratic? what do you realistically expect?

  • 173. 0 0
    # 47 Johanes, GREAT LETTER!
    • Dutch
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:46

    Johanes--I found your letter #47 hit the nail on the head!! Thanks so much--Dutch

  • 172. 0 0
    hussam
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:40

    so muslims conquered the middle east north africa,turkey,caucasus,cental asia,southern asia etc.etc. not to mention the slave trade. europe left a mess and so did the muslims.

  • 171. 0 0
    Chana
    • Ahmed
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:37

    you are right Amir is a murderer not a terrorist. I just choose this example because I didn't want to say Begin (the King David hotel if I'm correct)

  • 170. 0 0
    joachin
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:37

    are you harping on again about the Ashkenazi? are we supposed to applaud you because you don't hate the Sephardim?or do you? all of your quotes and citations are written by arabs.yesterday you cited a website TOTALLY run and written by arabs.Gee,could they be BIASED? I am still waiting to find out why 6million Ashkenazi were killed if they werent really jews.

  • 169. 0 0
    Chanah #165
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:36

    A very accurate political analysis... We're slowly raising the academic level on this forum!

  • 168. 0 0
    Jabotinski, Herut, Likud and Neocons
    • Joachim Martillo
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:34

    Even though the Kristols and the Himmelfarbs passed through a brief Trotskyite phase, Neoconservativism really develops out of American Revisionism and by the late 1930s developed connections to American white racist Christian fundamentalism and the extreme right wing of the Republican party. The actors in establishing these connections include Benzion Netanyahu (father of Binyamin Netanyahu). Baruch Korff (Nixon's favorite Rabbi) and Rav Kook's nephew Bergson. The American Revisionists are part of the Revisionist movement created by Jabotinsky. This movement is the ancestor of Herut and Likud in Israel. Jabotinskian Revisionist Zionism was part of the great tide of right wing extremist organic nationalism that swept Eastern Europe from the 1890s through the 1940s, and Jabotinsky's movement had numerous ties to the extreme right in Poland, the Ukraine and Hungary.

  • 167. 0 0
    Proud Zionist on Yaakov
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:31

    Hey,Proud,I notice in most of your posts there is a lot about Yaakov and Red Ken but little about Sharon,the person that the article is about. This is a common theme going through your posts. Always complaining about others relative to the content of the article but even more so not saying anything about Sharon tells me that you,Poud Zionist are afraid to say anything negative about any of your people...apart from the leftists that is......I mean Left Jews are not Jews are they,Proud Zionist? I mean you cannot like Karl Marx and Michael Lerner AND also Judaism even if the first kibbutzim were leftists,G-d forbid. But Sharon? Come on. You are sworn to him as Prime Minister and he is taking on the left,the Right AND the Palestinians and we cant say ANYTHING about him. Cant rock the apple cart can we,PZ but smash Yaakov at any opportunity wont we?

  • 166. 0 0
    Shimon #160
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:31

    Arabic people being kicked out of their houses in 1948 is not an invention of my imagination. I personally know people that it happened to. Denying this is equal to denying crimes such as ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, genocide perpetrated against the Tutsis in Rwanda, and the holocaust that was committed against ourselves. Shame on you! Please don't change into a Jewish David Irving. About the murders committed against the Jews in the 1920s, I'd really have to hear the Arabic point of view on it first to form a balanced opinion. If any of the very reasonable Palestinian respondents (Tareq, Hussam etc.) would like to jump in, please do... That violence is of course totally unjustifiable, as is the violence directed at both sides at present. Though I'm not sure as to the causes, I suspect that the sudden upsurge in Jewish inmigrants in the late 1800s (mainly from Northern Europe) had something to do with it. If you saw loads of people coming into your land, with a claim in their hand that this is the land of their ancestors, and THEREFORE (at least partially) theirs, you wouldn't be happy either. The coloniser's initial consent to the establishment of such a homeland on what had been for centuries land inhabited mostly by Arabs, must have inspired them with great fear regarding the future (and correctly so, with hindsight). So it isn't that easy to establish where history starts... Let me repeat though that that is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE to start killing your neighbours.

  • 165. 0 0
    Ahmed # 103
    • Chanah
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:23

    Yigal Amir is not a terorist. He is a murderer, a political assassin, if you wish, just like the person who assassinate Kennedy or any other political leader. Terrorists' goals are to instil fear in populations in order to make them come round to their way of thinking, in order to attain their oppressive goals by making their opponents submissive - as well as to create as much death, havoc and destruction as possible.

  • 164. 0 0
    Tulip its not autumn and flowers should not wilt!
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:19

    Wake up,its Haaretz time!

  • 163. 0 0
    chiva
    • mbrandi
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:18

    when you compare numbers you conveniently fail to mention the 1/2 of palestians killed who were killed by their own people! collaberators killed in the street and out without trial,honor killings,killings for personal agendas and mistakes.

  • 162. 0 0
    tity tity!!
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:13

    I never ever said that one life takes presidewnts over another. But the FEELINGS of one person clearly should be overshawoed by the LIVES of others...i dont feel bad if someone feels violated, if it is going to save lives. Kind of like i wouldnt care to be searched at an airport or subway stop if it meant they are ultimately trying to save lives. The point is checkpooints cannot stop UNTIL terrorism stops...and the arabs have shown no signs of stopping it so i guess the defensive measures to save innocent lives must continue.

  • 161. 0 0
    Yair
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:10

    You arent a self hating Jew. You are just ignorant. There is a difference. And This Hirstoy thing doesnt go back and forth that long. We can play this game. Becuase if you want to talk about your made up "ethnic cleansing of arabs before 1948", i can actually rbing a REAL historical ethnic cleansing that lead the Jews to go to israel besides the holocaust....try the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Iraq, Iran, and every other arab country. And if you want to talk about completely unprovoked arab terrorism that began the cycles, look to 1929 in Hebron and the Galil, where Jews hadnt been ethnic cleansing anyone and had been living there peacefully for thousands of years straight. Arabs brutally murdered over 60 Jews in Hebron riots and constantly shot and kurdered Jews in the Galil as well. So there it is...the begninnning of the cycle of violence and guess what....STARTED BY THE ARABS!!!

  • 160. 0 0
    Yaakov Sullivan and Red Ken
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:07

    Certainly there is much for an amoral person like yourself to like about Red Ken: like you, he -demonizes Israel from afar (you live in NYC, he lives in London) -minimizes and trivializes the Holocaust (you claim Jews "milk" the Holocaust, he called a Jewish reporter a "concentration camp guard") -blames Israel and the Jews for what is obviously a world-wide phenomenon of Islamic terror (or maybe you and Ken think Egypt was targetted, and 90 people were killed, because of the "Zionists") -Both of you live in cities that were attacked for reasons completely unrelated to Israel, but both of you are too dumb to realize that even if Hamas and Islamic Jihad make good on their promises of eradicating Israel, you will still be facing WWIII. -calls terror by another name. Yaakov calls "terror" by the name "rejectionism," like all enemies of Israel. Your comments saying that Livingstone doesn`t justify or excuse terror would be laughable if they weren`t so sad. The man has repeatedly invited known terrorists to London and sang their praises, and he is the mayor of a city that has become more and more and more extreme under his watch (all of the terrorists were home-grown. He has done NOTHING as all the mosques have become increasingly more radical). Poor Yaakov Sullivan, the man who willing joined the Jews only to spend the majority of his days demonizing them...

  • 159. 0 0
    # 136 Jonathan,I care
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:06

    We ARE part of the world arent we? We are not run by the Torah exactly word for word are we? We do get help from the US dont we? Of course I have to and want to care what the world says. Actually I cocka deaf en to the Orange section and the extreme fundamentalists on the other side.

  • 158. 0 0
    #125
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:06

    No problem. It bothers me a little that it is black and white the other way..like the way you see things. I will continue to say nice things about you...its my pleasure

  • 157. 0 0
    Ken Livingston
    • Art
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:05

    I do believe that Ken Livingston speaks representatively for a great number of people who simply have no understanding of terrorism. Even after his own city has suffered these heinous crimes, he still does not understand. Using his logic, what if Christians or Buddhists were to blow themselves up in London because someone criticized the pope or Billy Graham or Bhudda or some such action. Where would it stop?

  • 156. 0 0
    Shimon
    • Ahmed
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:03

    Shimon, I started saying that the big problem in my life is that although I have a university degree (I'm an engeneer) I can't find a job here in Belgium. One of the reason for that is that I'm Muslim and that people see me as a potentially violent person because of my religion. In other words terrorists are also hurting me. This is the reason why I dislike Ken Livingstone who is a provocator knowing that having a black/white position on difficult matters will generate attention from the media and probably increase his popularity among the voters, ignoring that the victims will be people like me. At the end of the day this is apparently the best strategy for extremists to recruit new members.

  • 155. 0 0
    RESPONSE TO ITEM 103
    • BARRY
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:01

    THE ORIGINS OF ISLAM IS BASED ON TERRORISM. MOHAMMED WAS ONE WHO USED SUCH TACTICS TO HIS ADVANTAGE. INFACT THE KORAN INFLAMES ITS FOLLOWERS TO FOLLOW AND KILL THE INFIDEL. AS A MATTER OF FACT THE ONLY INFIDELS ARE THE ISLAMICS.

  • 154. 0 0
    Yaakov Sullivan, proud to demonize Israel
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 17:00

    "I state again publically, I would sign it all over again. Contary to your ongoing hysteria, the divestment petition was limited to companies that sell or manufacture arms that are used by Israel in the occupied territories." The petition you signed, as you well know, singled out Israel alone among all nations in the world. It sought to portray Israel as a pariah state, as the Jew among the nations. It did not penalize the Palestinians, who were in the midst of a four year terror war. Yaakov Sullivan, a Jew living in New York, signed a document demonizing his "brothers" living in Israel (who were undergoing horrific terror attacks and desperately needed support). Why did you convert to Judaism when you are 100 percent lacking in "ahavat Yisrael" and when you are 100 percent against one of Judaism's central tenets (Zionism)? One can easily picture Yaakov's seder, where at the end he triumphantly screams "Next year in Al-Quds!!!" "Livingstone is not an anti-semite. You and Sharon and that ilk need to make him out to be such since he calls your occupation into question, hence, he must be discredited and silenced." I myself believe in disengagement and a two-state solution, so I don't know who my "ilk" are. Sharon also does, and is making a bold move toward peace. Ken, on the other hand, called a Jewish reporter a concentration camp guard and has reportedly invited terrorists to London so he can roll-out the red carpet for them. Like you, he is obsessed with demonizing the Jews from afar. You disgust me.

  • 153. 0 0
    Yaakov
    • Michael
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:56

    You or anyone else have given no reason to believe that Livingstone is right. He is givin out highly contradictory statements, and you are defending him as if he was some kind of "great truth teller." Bullshit. He's a pathetic liar and he will learn sooner or later his mistakes, if he is smart enought for that. Nobody can control Livingstone, but he is not untuchable, so that his views could not be ciriticised. Quite the opposite in fact, he is in place where ciriticism should be strong and harsh. Unfortunately, he seems to be unable to learn anything from it... at least for now. You seem to have that same problem - trying to understand and whitewash something that should never be whitewashed. Some call you enemy because of that, I consider it to be idealistic nonsense that only encourages more terrorist acts.

  • 152. 0 0
    Livingstone
    • Ken LeRoy
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:51

    The last post should read "have not been detrimental". I feel sorry for people like you, Paul Harris, you seem to have a lot to say about "rien du tout".

  • 151. 0 0
    To Ahmed with an e
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:51

    Ahmeds two posts: My problem with this speach is that today Islam is becoming evil all over Europe. It is becoming more difficult for us to work because people are linking terror and muslims. We muslims don`t dare to say in our own community that terror is wrong and related to a fanatic group of muslims. Not all muslims are terrorists (I`m not a terrorist) and not all terrorists are muslims (I`m sure you would agree to call Ygal Amir a terrorist). My point is that with this kind of allegations you (and Ken livingstone) are pushing the weakest among us in the hands of people willing to make the muslim society more violent and more stupid. Again this is the kind of conversation I cannot have with my family and friends today. Ahmed,I agree not all muslims are terrorists but how many muslims support terror a) against the western world (Islamic fundamentalist terror) b) against Israel (reistance terror) c) a mixture of the two As a Jew and a pro Israeli AND a humanitarian,I really condemn any unneccesary aggravation that the Palestinians go through on a daily basis,but also understand how difficult it is for Israeli guards to know who is whom. I feel bad for Tareq because he has to go through this on a daily basis but I have read him and know the way he thinks and he is a reasonable person. The police officers anxiously shot that Brazilian by mistake.Its a tragedy,but one can understand the dilemma that they had.here is a possible suicide bomber leaving a house with a coat and bag on a summer day,a house that was suspected of harbouring these terrorists.I dont condone it but I can understand the problem. Also with a Palestinian kid running to a guard..is HE a bomb is the question (I always though the Israeli guards should use tear gas or water cannon though) I think the answer lies with the muslims themselves.They have to decide whether they are with the terrorists or AGAINST the terrorists (I abhor the settlers that steal palestinian olive trees)not simply saying it.You must be actively dealing with it along with the authorities and make it clear is who is with them and who is not. Splitting Islam? Yes if you have to. I will split Judaism if I have to. My loyalty is to the essence of Judaism not the clan mentality of the right, and not the give everything away for nothing mentality of the left.Thats why I support Sharon. You want to condemn the terrorists? STAND UP AND BE BRAVE! Your life supposed to be less important than the morality. BE BRAVE AND DO IT!

  • 150. 0 0
    #115 tity defends all muslims very good work does she know them all???
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:48

    tity, you will not absorb anything that makes sense and continually make wild statements to justify your position. the evidence so far is that the muslim world is engaged in terrorism and in which the majority make no effort to disclaim the alleged fanatics! you take it upon yourself without any knowedge or experience!

  • 149. 0 0
    #115 tity defends all muslims very good work does she know them all???
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:48

    tity, you will not absorb anything that makes sense and continually make wild statements to justify your position. the evidence so far is that the muslim world is engaged in terrorism and in which the majority make no effort to disclaim the alleged fanatics! you take it upon yourself without any knowedge or experience! i take it from one of your previous that you are an only child ! you do not even know how anormal family functions

  • 148. 0 0
    il Re Nudo (E. Schwarz) !is Red Ken the kid of the tale?
    • Jean-Luc Ngarambe
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:47

    Ken Livingston has said what any comparative politics study of Israeli and Palestinian polity says: Hamas and Likud belong to the same political area: the parafascist right. The usual objection that Likud is secular and Hamas is religious doesn?t fly. The so-called secularist of the Likud are what can be called devout atheist, people who even if they don?t believe in it use religion as a poltical tool: Likud Party ancestor, the Herut called itself liberal but was instrumental in bring religious politics into Israel polity. While Hamas who proclaim its religious basis is not shy of secular posturing. It is worth recalling that the first Likoud government went out of their ways to strengthen Hamas. Is that their histories are so similar, born from racist extremists the betar and the muslim brotherhood, they grew forming terrorists cells the Irgun, the Lehi, the Ezzedine al Qassam , than were always out to sabotage peace in Deir Yassin and Sabra and Shatila then suicide-bombings. They are both coherent Likudnik will love to push Palestinian in to the Jordan desert Hamas will adore the idea of sinking all Jews into the see From the Likud platform The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. Thus, for example, in matters of foreign affairs, security, immigration and ecology, their activity shall be limited in accordance with imperatives of Israel's existence, security and national needs. From the Hamas platform: initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its faith, the movement educates its members to adhere to its principles and to raise the banner of Allah over their homeland as they fight their Jihad: "Allah is the all-powerful, but most people are not aware." Is there anyone who misses the similarities

  • 147. 0 0
    107 franzi in torment
    • bm
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:46

    the army is in total support of the govt the dissenters total no more or less than a few hundred and this few hundred is the same figure no matter what the issue sharon if he called an election tomorrow would without doubt be returned where is the cut and run you talk so easily about the army will be a very km from gaza as i told you many times - i am not wrong and you have the enviable record of never being right - dont forget your position in life - the forum fool finally it was arab kill arab in the camps and they are still at it all these years later more arabs killing more arabs everywhere you were never clever - but stop proving it bm

  • 146. 0 0
    Ken should speak to 1000's of terror victims..
    • Okun
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:45

    This ignorant and malicious mayor should repeat his stupid remarks to a room full of 1000's of Israelis whose lives were devastated by suicide bombings. The same bombings that injured them physically, emotionally, economically and killed their loved ones. An addition of London victims who just experienced the same tragedies would be a good idea! If he could repeat his remarks, then he is heartless!!!!!!!!

  • 145. 0 0
    #141 leroy gets facts mixed entirely
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:43

    ken, did canada leech on britain before independence or was it the other way around. waht you have written down is absolute garbage! instead of your anti semitic rantings let us examine realities ! the usa since 1948 has supported israel with military equipment so that it is a bastion in the middle east! also the close military and economic ties are in the interests of the usa especially during the cold war! since britain tokk all the land in the ottoman empire by conquest how did anyone steal it from anyone ? your frantic rage is leading you to apossible anuerism !

  • 144. 0 0
    Livingstone doesn't get it
    • Avrum
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:43

    The problem with Mr. Livingstone is that he has a mouth but no brain. a. If the Israelis wanted to go in with their full force they could easily kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians. b. If the Israelis wanted to go into Gaza as undercover soldiers or as you conspirator theorists say "mossad" agents, it would be easy to plant bombs and leave. They would not need to be suicide bombers as there is little or no security. The difference Mr. Livingstone is that believe it or not the Israelis have a respect for life, be it Jew,Moslem,Christian,Buddhist........

  • 143. 0 0
    MAYOR LIVINGSTONE IS RIGHT-IT'S AN UN FAIR BALANCE
    • Dutch
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:38

    Of Course , Mayor Livingstone is correct when he says the Israeli line on combating terrorism is too stubborn. Indeed, I feel refusing to address the root causes of terrorism is only fueling terror by the day; the hour and the minute. Little wonder the Israeli army is finding this too at check points too. They are not stopping terror they are simply maintaining it--if even that some days. We have to talk to terrorists to stop or prevent terrorists attacks. Our human problems don't go away by ignoring them. Public officials have a duty to find out the root causes of terrorism and correct them. That's the proper way to stop and prevent terror. Mayor Livingstone is right in his approach--we must negotiate with terrorists--Sharon's appraoch is wrong. This is evident by the rising body count. Sharon only stated a half truth when he said "Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis." The other important part of that statement should have include was his own 10F terrorists who have murdered over 4,000 Palestinians (mostly civilians with no ties to terror during the last four years); While Hamas murdered over 1,000 Israelis. Numbers don't lie. So Israel is by far the greater offender. Indeed, I must also agree with Mayor Livingstone Hamas and Likud are the flip sides of the same coin. "Each side emphasizes the extremism of the other in order to attract sympathy," Livingstone said. So for Sharon to conclude: "The comparison drawn by the mayor of London was grave and inappropriate" is indeed a farce! If anyone can be said to be ignorant and show a misunderstanding of reality" that Sharon himself. But of course, Sharon being Sharon is far from being a fool either. I feel he has used this war on terror as a smoke screen for grabbing more Palestinian land and settlement expansion. That has been the one feature that has been gaining not losing in this battle. Still, while Sharon and his Army get to rip off the Palestinians and their land under the disguise of the war on terror--the Palestinians "don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons," like Livingstone said. Now that's "an unfair balance" as Mayor Livingstone pointed out. Dutch

  • 142. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone War Criminal
    • Emily
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:38

    Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year-old Brazilian electrician was on his way to work when he was gunned down by a member of Livingstone's police force. When is Ken, the butcher of London, going to be tried for this war crime?

  • 141. 0 0
    Ahmed # 103 - Muslims = terrorists?
    • Daniel Leopold
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:35

    Not all Muslims are terrorists and not all Jews are Zionists either but with your atrocity anti Jewish garbage propaganda in the Arab media like the sermons by demented and primitive clerics,allegations against Israeli politicians,rabid anti-semitic stuff from the Middle Ages and the nazi era like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion on the Egyptian and Syrian TV's you push us all in the hands of our extremists. ISRAEL IS THERE TO STAY AND WE WILL ALWAYS SUPPORT AND HELP IT SO GET OVER IT

  • 140. 0 0
    Livingstone's" thorn in the side"
    • Ken LeRoy
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:33

    To Paul Harris: Edmund Rothschild started the first zionist settlement in Palestine, 120 years ago, and that was the start of the "leeching", first on Brittain, then on USA. he folloewd with Metulla and followed with many other jewish communities. He brought Russian jews as settlers, but used them more as slaves. In 1948, the zionists received a license to stea, Comprend-tu tete de pioche? Canadians did not go to leech on US, they went on WORKing visas, and they were not displaced urchins, like some DP's. During the American Civil War, over 60,000 Canadian lads went to fight for American Liberty. Canadians export oil, natural gas and Hydro electricity to USA, ands if not the US would freeze or roast in the dark. Without Canada's 1.5 millions Snowbirds, the state of Florida would go bankrupt. We Canadians have been detrimental in the US growth, not "LEECHES"

  • 139. 0 0
    Ken Livingston
    • tamara jordan
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:31

    Ken Livingston's remarks are an attempt to divert attention from his own problems with London's underclas.

  • 138. 0 0
    Shimon..Shimon!
    • Tity
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:31

    Let me get things straight.... I cannot possibly ever HATE Jewish life, as you mention, as I would hate myself. Secondly, I havent hated anyone in my life until now and i think its maybe among the feelings i have never felt as I love mostly and not dislike. Thirdly, you say: " Seems you dont value a Jewish life all that much." I dont value Jewish life that much? I said i value my life...and why is Jewish life different than a Muslim life or a Buddhist life??? Can you explain this to me....???? I feel my life and my best friends life (a Muslim and a Buddhist) is of the same worth! They are not people of a lesser God.... The problem is superiority Shimon...If we stop consider ourselves the best among the best we will see how humans are and we will value them much more. Starting from a simple goodmorning to our neighbours... (I feel bad that i have to include myself in my sentence and to show you that all of us should try and be more humanists. I dont feel superior or inferior to anyone..) But Shimon...you seem to do a lot of searching with the egg and the chicken..Try to see the main point. Ok yes, suicide bombings happen I CONDEMN THEM 100% THEY HAVE TO STOP, but they happen. Ok yes, IDF at checkpoints treat Palestinians in an awful way, I CONDEMN THEM 100%, THEY HAVE TO STOP, but they happen. Slowly steps will take Israel and Palestine towards peace. People are tired of being under occupation...they want to live their lives normally like all of us in the Diaspora. Is it so hard to accept???

  • 137. 0 0
    Ignorant Ken!
    • Okun
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:31

    Ken Livingstone agains shows his ignorance and hate. What kind of a mayor defends suicide bombers after they strike his own city? The Likud is a LEGITIMATE CIVILIZED POLITICAL PARTY that has military power just like any other normal country. Hamas is a

  • 136. 0 0
    Ken Livingston
    • Michael Salzberg
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:30

    Livingston is quite a dolt, mouthing simple minded lunacies of the left. Unfortunately, these ideas have infected the Universities and Middle East departments of America. It represents a very dangerous, hatefilled ideology masked in the retoric of understanding and compassion.

  • 135. 0 0
    How amusing
    • Jonathan
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:28

    Truly amusing that people take seriously the rambling of an openly antisemitic person such as the mayor of London. All I can say is this: The jews will never enjoy love from the gentiles(with the exeption of a limited few). Hence the state of Israel our sovereign home.Let the gentiles feel and say what they want.We dont care.

  • 134. 0 0
    Cornelia
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:26

    Cornelia,its more than chess.Sharon has a chess mind and a wrestlers arm. Without his power,the chess game cannot work. It takes both. Thats why I say that when you marginalize the extreme,and you balance the gun with the politik to are king.Now if the palestinians could do the same,we have a deal. But they are too much like wrestlers and little like chess players (see Hamas ridiculous moves over the past few weeks when they could have snatched power with some savvy politik) Still they are what they are,no not muslims,no not Palestinians but Robin Hood and his gang,though not as moral. Its time the Palestinians found someone with character and good will to deal with Israel and its time some of the Palestinians here admitted that.

  • 133. 0 0
    Shimon #117
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:25

    And what came first: Arab terrorism or decades of occupation? I know, I know... We can now expect: and what came first? Decades of occupation or several Arabic invasions? And then I'm going to say: what came first? several Arabic invasions, or Jewish settlement leading to ethnic cleansing? and so on, and so forth... Maybe we should learn that these arguments never end. History is (nearly) endless. Mosts actions are taken as a reaction to a previous action. There's no point in trying to find a culprit. Let's leave history behind us and look at the future! Yair PS And before you call me anti-semitic, I'm Jewish. I thereby assume that I can now expect the flattering label of "self-hating Jew".

  • 132. 0 0
    Livingstone ignorant twirp
    • Adam Schonbrun
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:21

  • 131. 0 0
    To Moshe Post-100 and Franzen Post-107
    • Chaim Kauffman
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:17

    Discrepencies arise in regards to morality. Since 700 A.D., Muslems believed that it was part of there religion to enforce "dhimmi" on Jews, and Jews would either except there situation or leave. The persecuation of Jews was not only apparent, however, was accepted and appluaded. This is still occuring today. In all their military operations, every Arab countries similated enemy is Israel. Many Muslems are taught world wide, (there are several reported instances in Canada too), to not associate with Jews and Israel/Zionism is evil. Many are taught to hate Jews, and the world wide acts of anti-semitism are proof of this sad tail. Therefor, it is not a matter of what the Arabs did to the Jews versus what the Jews do to the Palestinians, the Arabs used the iron fist on Jews out of self-honor and committment to Islam, whereas Jews 'occupy' the terrorities for military strategical positon. There can be no doubt that the Jews living under Muslem rule for almost 1500 years, in many instances, had far less freedom then the Palestinians do during the occupation. As far as Sharon being a war criminal, your accusations root from the conclusion of the Israeli government following the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. He allowed for Christian Arabs to give their Muslem counterparts a taste of there own sword. Who were the Muslem war criminals during the war? I bet you cannot name any. All who committed attrocities against the Christians and Druze were rewarded and thus considered heroes. Your heros go unnamed, yet your Jewish war criminals feel your wrath. Your view on Israel is borderline racist. Abbas is a former part of Black September and wrote his thesis about the holocaust being fabricated. His predessor, Yasser Arafats uncle served as Hitlers top advisor, and massacred many Jews. Yet you feel the need to target Israel soley for critisism. Shame on you Franzen. I hope G-D shows you a miracle that helps rid you of your ignorance, and that you see the light before it is to late for yourself and your children.

  • 130. 0 0
    Ken Livingswine and Neville Chamberlain
    • Herbert Kaine
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:16

    Red Ken and Neville Chamberlain are different sides of the same coin. Both got into bed with terrorism, and ended up getting spurned by an untrustworthy lover. They both got "Piece in our time". Ken should resign immediately for his role in importing terror to London

  • 129. 0 0
    Maddie from Abu London
    • Mark
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:13

    To the Haaretz Editors: "The more infidels are killed, the more heavenly reward we will get. This is how to spread the name and will of Allah. This is the basis of Islam. When Europe is once again a docile servant of Allah and Islam, whether dead or alive, then we will have succeeded in our goals. You Jews in Israel are arrogant. You think you are special. The only thing that makes you special is that you are first on the list." I suggest you forward the IP to the appropriate authorities (especially if the IP logged is coming from London) as this individual appears to be unstable and most likely connected to terrorism. Feel free to post it on the talkback as it's too late for that murder advocate anyway. Mark

  • 128. 0 0
    Hussam #64
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:11

    Totally agreed! I'm moving to Jerusalem in November, and I'll try to make a tiny contribution to that goal...

  • 127. 0 0
    Ken the moron
    • Alain
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:11

    Ken's remoteness from reality would be amusing if it were not shared by so many. While Mr Livingstone may be one of the more visible people encouraging suicide bombers in Israel, he's not the only one. Detachment from reality is extremally common these days, and don't kid yourself in Israel that Ken's the only one over here with s**t for brains. Having said all that, Israelis themselves should be aware that the small minority of your fellow countrymen who do advocate "kicking the Arabs out" are seized upon by every headline writer in this country and elsewhere. Yes, I'm aware its freedom of speech and Israel is a strong, vibrant democracy, but many people are too ignorant and lazy to spend the time finding this out, and *will* just read the flashy headlines.

  • 126. 0 0
    Ahmed
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:10

    Yuo are right. Not all muslims are terrorists and not all terrorists are muslims. But I am sure even you would agree that at least 90% (personally i would say more) of terrorsits ARE muslims. Think London, Egympt, Israel, USA, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanastan. Do you think its just a coincidents that most terrorists originate from arabic middle eastern countries?? Becuase of you do not see that, you are part of the problem, which is that Muslims turn their backs and fail to acknowledge there is a problem in their religion of terrorists and they choose not to correct it. Start teaching your children that all of it is wrong instead of inciting hatred like in arabic text books for one small example. If you stop glorifying murderers, this trend could finally start coming to an end.

  • 125. 0 0
    Why dignify the mayor?
    • Ron
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:04

    Let him talk as London and the west burn. The moslems will continue to murder their way to every sick goal that they have from the elimination of Israel to the arabization of western culture with sympathy from the stupid, the smug, the naive and Ken Livingstone as its poster boy.

  • 124. 0 0
    Thank you for your kind words #119
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 25.07.05
    • 16:01

    Thank you for your kind words and deep understanding. I'm delighted to see that you understand the issue in such black and white terms.

  • 123. 0 0
    this is not ignorance!
    • Roland
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:59

    stupidity makes him blind... London didn't receive enough?

  • 122. 0 0
    Divestment Again!!! #106
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:58

    I guess you've returned from your participation with this orange anti-democratic protesters. Back to the divestment theing again. You can't leave that alone, can you? I state again publically, I would sign it all over again. Contary to your ongoing hysteria, the divestment petition was limited to companies that sell or manufacture arms that are used by Israel in the occupied territories. I know you will find that unacceptable but I fear there is nothing that can be done about that since you are a supporter and apologist for occupation. Livingstone is not an anti-semite. You and Sharon and that ilk need to make him out to be such since he calls your occupation into question, hence, he must be discredited and silenced.

  • 121. 0 0
    Ken's appeasement
    • Andrew
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:53

    Ken's appeasement of Islamist terrorism couldn't help London from the first attack or the second one. He is a liability for Londoners and a racist of the first order.

  • 120. 0 0
    Franzen, where is my response ?
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:50

    Did my post ("Franzen and Red Ken", 66) help you understand the basic differences between a genocidal pack of anti-Semites that deliberately targets children (Hamas) and a democratic party recognized by the world that has no paramilitary org? I sure hope so. Also, are you still the moderator of a discussion group that debates whether or not the Holocaust occurred? I sure hope not...

  • 119. 0 0
    Mr. Livingston and the Palestinian terrorists
    • Moti
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:46

    During the British mandate in Palestine prior to the creation of Israel, the British faced with the resistance of the Jewish resistance movements and consequently, the local Jewish population were subjected to curfews, road blocks and other harsh measures (like the cold-blooded murder of Yair Stern). Mr. Livingston argues that the Palestinian terrorists resort to suicide bombings since they have only their body to fight the Israeli army. According to this theory, we were entitled to do the same during the British mandate in Palestine and send suicide bombers to London's buses and subways, since we could not match the weapons of the British and we had only our bodies.

  • 118. 0 0
    Yaakov
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:46

    Before you continue being a self-hating Jew, think for a second at the comparison you just made. You said that a known terrorist organization that takes pride in the murder of so many of your innocent people is analogous to the army that trie s to protect your people. Think about that...then you can continue to be a horrible self hating Jew that you are.

  • 117. 0 0
    Europe and the west on 2 different paths
    • Dan Fried
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:45

    Read "Of Paradise and Power" by Robert Kagan. Europe is not on the same path as the west. We are fooling ourselves to think that NATO is made up of countries who share the same values and understandings. The common element is oil and its use. Human decencey and BASIC human existence have two definitions. The west deplores the loss of life under any circumstance. Europe sees it the same as most arab countries do - NOT such a big deal to see children used as suicide bombers. Europe and arab countries justify all losses of life as a necessary way to get the point across. Shame shame shame on the mayor of londun and the PM of UK !!!

  • 116. 0 0
    Tity
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:44

    Let me get this straight...In your post you compared IDF cursing Arabs to arabs blowing up israeli children??? Seems you dont value a Jewish life all that much. I also have a simple "waht came first the chicken or the egg" type question for you to ponder: What came fisst, the checkpoints or the brutal murderous arab animal terrorists? You seem to calim that the terrorism, and innocent people being killed, is porvoked by taking a long tiem at checkpoints, so think about which came first. Did u ever think that the checkpoints were a nessesity brought on my the huge wave of terrorism?? BECAUSE THATS WHY THEY ARE THERE!! Terrorism came first, not the checkpoitsn. And besides, whenwas the lat time you were on a long line for something and decided you wre angry and u went out into the middle fo the street and killed innocent peopel??? ONE DOESNT FIT THE OTHER UNLESS LIKE I SAID BEFORE, YOU JUST HATE JEWISH LIFE.

  • 115. 0 0
    Johane #47
    • Shimon
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:40

    They are the same huh? Please indulge me then and tell me any time in history that any member of the likud strrapped a bomb to his chest and aimed to kill as many innocent people shopping or going to school or work as he could??? I will be around all day so u have plenty of time to make something up like u usually do

  • 114. 0 0
    Paul Harris open your eyes and read!
    • Tity
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:39

    Paul Harris... how do you explain the fact that you are among the few who misinterpret me constantly???? Did i ever say that i will "blame the british government for four muslims blowing up innocent people on the tube?" ---------------------- Of course not! I ever said that...you said that! Of course these 4 British muslims were to blame for the blasts in London. BUT THIS DOESNT MEAN THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS! TRY TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE. We cannot blame ll Muslims for that! There are many many many amazing Muslims out there... Neither did i say that "likud is responsible for the terrorism of hamas is it not formed solely for the purpose of murder and elimination of jews from israel? does likuds manfesto say eradicate all arabs from the mandated trritories ??" did i say anything like that? you said it,...there are difference between Haas and Likud but there are similarities..open your eyes and you will see...

  • 113. 0 0
    Ahmad, what are you laughing about?
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:34

    Ahmad, You have exposed yourself as a liar (not surprisingly). In your initial post you said Hamas killed a "couple dozens." Now, from the link you have provided, we find out that just from 2000-2004 they have killed nearly 500 hundred people. Maybe you can't count, or you are so used to telling lies that another one just doesn't phase you? As I noted, the Palestinians decided to reject peace in 2000 and wage war instead. They are ultimately responsible for the tragic death tolls on both sides. Hamas is especially responsible for adopting a method of warfare (basing itself among civilians) that causes many civilian deaths...

  • 112. 0 0
    "Ken" to Ken?..."Lo" !
    • Odile
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:34

    Don't forget: Red Ken is Al-Qaradawi's friend, and alredy his "dhimmi"... Kisses from France

  • 111. 0 0
    respect point of view
    • Sami
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:33

    I think that Livingstone is completely right. I respect his point of view.

  • 110. 0 0
    Ronnie
    • Cornelia
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:32

    Isn't it like playing chess? Sharon is a brilliant simultaneous player.

  • 109. 0 0
    Muslim = Terrorist (?) Read for the answer
    • Dan from Haifa
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:30

    The sad fact of the matter is that the people who flew planes into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, who blew up commuter trains in Madrid, who blew up subway trains in Londonarabia, who blow themselves up in ice cream parlors and discoteques in Israel in hopes of scoring with 72 virgins, who blew up vacationers in Bali, who commit acts of demonic brutality against their corelgionists in Algeria and Iraq, are, without exception, Muslims. This is a religion truly gone mad and gone bad. A religion that has rotted. A religion being led by those who preach an ethos of indiscriminate death and destrution against the "unbelievers". Worse, Muslim Arabs have and infinite capacity for denial. Their problems, poverty, violence, lack of democracy, can always be blamed on Jews, Americans and "Infidels" in that order. No, not all Muslims are terrorists (though many are sympathizers) but the facts are that in the last few year most terrorists and undeniably Muslim. You would think Muslims would have a little more shame.

  • 108. 0 0
    WHERE IS DR.FOX??? #98
    • Warren
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:30

    i need a doctor... i actually agree with yaakov's post here. livingstone has a history of being an imbacile, this is obviously no exception, i think sometimes 'silence' is a much more tactful alternative

  • 107. 0 0
    #77 ken leroy is amazing even in french
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:30

    now you have made an amazing statement ? israel 1948 =57 years "over a century" leeching thats a good old word from the chirugeoens and the barbers poles! now ken how many canadians in a century have leeched on the usa for work ??? let us have more inaccuries from the "pro israel" sector

  • 106. 0 0
    "mostly, filled with hate, racism, and pure cold blooded murders."
    • JOHANES Franzen
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:30

    Yes Arik was always their hero. He was the big train that could, a bulldozer of Arabs, a war machine in itself. The proud Conqueror of Sabra&Shatila. He has more innocent blood on his hands than any other Israeli. The minute he slowed down, he found himself in a radicalized Israel's political "center". He has become mainstream and the vaccum he left out there on the right is being filled with every loonatic Israel can muster, but the difference is that they don't have the army behind them, an army that now is being called "Judenraat" and "Nazis" by the Torah waiving crowd for backing the State in its decision to cut and run from the dream of Greater Eretz. This obbesse war criminal is at odds with the other war criminals. Oy vey what a mess, internal fighting among the settlers and their former leader.

  • 105. 0 0
    Who is Yaakov Sullivan?
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:30

    Who is Yaakov Sullivan? He is a man who publicly signed a divestment petition that targetted one country, and one country only, in the entire world. Was that country Sudan, which is currently committing genocide? No. Was that country Saudi Arabia, which forces women to cover from head-to-toe and doesn't allow them to leave the country without male permission? No. Was it the Palestinians, who have embraced terror as a way of life and started an "intifadah" in place of peace in 2000? No. Yaakov signed a petition that singled out Israel, alone among the nations, for divestment. He signed during a time when Israelis were dying daily during a vicious intifada. Yaakov supported the effort to turn Israel into the "Jew among the nations." Even Noam Chomsky eventually admitted the immorality of this sick petition. Yaakov, apparently you don't understand the difference between Hamas and Likud, so please see post "Franzen and Red Ken (post 66)." Certainly there is much for an amoral person like yourself to like about Red Ken: like you, he -demonizes Israel from afar (you live in NYC, he lives in London) -minimizes and trivializes the Holocaust (you claim Jews "milk" the Holocaust, he called a Jewish reporter a "concentration camp guard") -blames Israel and the Jews for what is obviously a world-wide phenomenon of Islamic terror (or maybe you and Ken think Egypt was targetted, and 90 people were killed, because of the "Zionists") -Both of you live in cities that were attacked for reasons completely unrelated to Israel, but both of you are too dumb to realize that even if Hamas and Islamic Jihad make good on their promises of eradicating Israel, you will still be facing WWIII. Your comments saying that Livingstone doesn't justify or excuse terror would be laughable if they weren't so sad. The man has repeatedly invited known terrorists to London and sang their praises, and he is the mayor of a city that has become more and more and more extreme under his watch (all of the terrorists were home-grown. He has done NOTHING as all the mosques have become increasingly more radical). Poor Yaakov Sullivan, the man who willing joined the Jews only to spend the majority of his days demonizing them... You and Livingston (and Franzen the Holocaust denier) really are a nice trio.

  • 104. 0 0
    #70 tity is in full flow once again, which comes first the chicken or the egg
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:15

    no doubt tity you will blame the british government for four muslims blowing up innocent people on the tube? is likud responsible for the terrorism of hamas is it not formed solely for the purpose of murder and elimination of jews from israel? does likuds manfesto say eradicate all arabs from the mnadated trritories ?? tity you remain fogged up but that doesnt stop you at all does it !

  • 103. 0 0
    response to Hussam of Jerusalem, Israel
    • David Bloch
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:15

    well mister, seems like you have a selective memory of history: Maybe the west went onto colonization of Africa but Arabs / Muslims did indeed trade Black people and promote slavery. I was in many African countries for work and pleasure and turst me, everywhere (especially in Zanzibar) are remains of Muslims traces.... horrible! I would not be proud of a people that did so much bad things and continues... for example, can't Muslims and their leaders condemn terrorism (London?!)? it took almost two weeks before they finally met and starting taking a stand!! cowards you all are. David

  • 102. 0 0
    Muslims = terrorist ?
    • Ahmed
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:08

    Not all muslims are terrorists (I'm not a terrorist) and not all terrorists are muslims (I'm sure you would agree to call Ygal Amir a terrorist). My point is that with this kind of allegations you (and Ken livingstone) are pushing the weakest among us in the hands of people willing to make the muslim society more violent and more stupid. Again this is the kind of conversation I cannot have with my family and friends today.

  • 101. 0 0
    Livingstone
    • Norm
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:08

    Livingstone is not only ignorant but dangerous. It is these individuals who fuel hatred and then wonder why their cities are being bombed. Where was he when England let in without proper scrutiny the thousands of hate mongrols?

  • 100. 0 0
    ITEM 77
    • BARRY
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:05

    DONT MAKE WILD ALLEGATIONS. PROVE IT WITH FACTS IF YOU WANT ONE TO ACCEPT YOUR ALLEGATIONS.

  • 99. 0 0
    Dhimmis
    • Moshe
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:03

    "the Zionist gangs and the Israeli overment hat murdered hundreds of thousands of Arabs. In fact they had murdered hundred of millions." Yep you got it right~! You Arabs and French are really smart. Your inaccurate statistics give an excuse for Hamas to murder Israelis. Reminds of the blood libels. All your Muslim heros must have been right for killing the Jews because we were you using your blood for our Matza and Wine for Passover. You all wine continously about "oppression in the 'occupied territories,' and use that to justify suicide bombers delibrately blowing up innocent civilians. How about you talk about the opression Jews faced at the hands of Arabs for over 1000 years~? How about the Dhimmis? How about the 1000ad law (till now in most places!) in most Muslim countries that forbid Jews to practice religion publically. Or how about in North Africa where Jews had to walk on one side of the road and if a Jew bumped into a Muslim while walking, the Muslim had a right to kill the Jew. Never mentioned. That is why Arab countries are not advancing like they should. Because they are ignorant to history and refuse to admit errors over the milenium. The Jews didnt want to conquor Gaza. The Arabs, some now known as the Palestinians declared war after war on Israel, and refused to recognize its existance. But you never mention that in your arguements, about the brutality in Arabs during, before and after wars with Israel. Just the poor suffering of Palestinians DUE TO ISRAEL, which justifies DEATH TO JEWS and the ERRADICATION OF ISRAEL. I think Livingstone should become the Mayor for Gaza and see how well the Palestinians treat him.

  • 98. 0 0
    Amazing me: Ahmad!!
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:02

    to all Zionists and murdering Sharon and Israeli policy appologist: you might want to check this great site for your own mental health and well being and humanity. http://www.ifamericansknew.org/ enjoy

  • 97. 0 0
    Livingstone is Correct. Sharon can't control him
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:00

    As I've said before, the Lord mayor of London is hardly known for his tact. But, essentially, he is correct in his comparison of the extremists in both Israel and Palestine. They play off each other. Israel of course is one of the wolrd most powerful militaries and can operate with impunity. Sharon, who is used to controlling situations, cannot control Livingstone and so he must chastise him publically. Livingstone correctly sees a correlation between terror and the rise in terror and this sends Sharon up the wall. Livingstone does not excuse nor justify terror but he does see the context in which it occurs. That for Sharon, of course means he would have to completely reevaluate his policy in the West Bank and his devouring annexation in East Jerusalem, something he will never do unless forced to and he is not a man he takes well to force. He's much better at being "dafka", Livingstone realises that and calls him on it. Sharon reacts instinctively and nothing moves.

  • 96. 0 0
    Ahmad
    • Mike
    • 25.07.05
    • 15:00

    Would you accept peace with Israel without the return of 100ks of Palestinians to Israel as part of a peace plan (which would assure the future destruction of the Jewish state based on a demographic time bomb)? Blame your own leaders for the mess you are in because that issue was the main obstacle to a deal when Arafat launched the latest round of violence in 2000. The reason you do not have your own state is your people and your fellow Arab bretheren's desire to destroy Israel, not make peace with her. Is it Israels fault that there was no Palestinian state before 1967? On some level I feel sorry for the Palestinians since they have been used as pawns by corrupt Arab regimes for decades to divert the Arab masses attention from the utter bankruptcy of their regimes and the utter failure of the Arab world to compete in the modern world (other then acquiring wealth through pumping oil).

  • 95. 0 0
    livingston
    • tony
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:58

    what is ths, Zionists and Israelis murdered hundreds of millions of arabs. Is this the french version of the truth. you are full of crap. The fact is, Sharon may be a savage, but he is pulling settlers and soldiers out of gaza, and no one else has done that. Hamas is hurting its own Palestinian brothers and sisters but continuing to send Qassams and by attacking the Palestinian Authority policemen. Hamas has done good things for Palestinians in charity work, it is true, but they are behaving like gangsters right now. they are hurting their own people. they could never behave like that in west Bank. Livingston needs a scapegoat for the London bobmings...blame it on the Israelis...of course....wanker Tony, Paris

  • 94. 0 0
    to Pround Zionists (I do not know why?) II
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:57

    the following sites will assit you in getting you info. up to date, Habibi http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Terror+Groups/Hamas+terror+attacks+22-Mar-2004.htm http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/hamas-ops.htm Although the bulk of Hamas' operation were carried out during this intifada (95%) and due to your own giv't stats, hamas did not kill that many Israelis as I earlier thought. Go figures Mr. "thousands" you and your ilk

  • 93. 0 0
    Nazi-Communist
    • MG
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:57

    german neo-nazis applause red ken! at least, in their logic, he is fundamentally right. does his understanding for suicide bombers comprise letal action against homosexuals?

  • 92. 0 0
    Sharon should not have mentioned the creep Ken
    • Amos
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:50

    A Prime Minister giving airtime to that loathesome creature Ken Livingstone? Sharon should have left it to some junior minister to rebuke the morally repugnant Ken.

  • 91. 0 0
    LE ROY.If "Leaching"="Merde"What do you call Egypt, PA etc.?
    • Peter S.M.
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:47

    Est ce que possible that vous avez merde dans la tete? Vive L'hauteur that's all that the Arab colony of France has got left.

  • 90. 0 0
    Shlomie, ya Hablah, her's the answer!
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:47

    First, not all terrorists are Muslimswe have: 1-Colombians 2-Venzeuleans 3-Peruveans 4-Neapalians. 5-Srilankans. 6-Communist Philipenos. and we have an entire state, called Israel, with million of it's inhabitants do vote in to the gov't terrorists. But, why Muslims are targeting westerners, it is simple becuase westerners are in our land, and ocupying it, let alone instaling colonialist states such as Israel, or by proxy, such as Jordan and Al Jaafari gov't in baghdad!! Are we sucessful? you bet, and that tells you how great we are when we believe in defending our rights to live in libery, freedom and worship our ALLAH. eat your heart our, we are good, are not we, and that all becuase our relgion is good. Okay, roohi?

  • 89. 0 0
    Ahmad's ignorance
    • Clouds
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:42

    The Palestinian Authority had a terrorist as a chairman and a thief at that.

  • 88. 0 0
    Chomsky? Well well!
    • Arnold Holtzman
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:40

    At least Noam Chomsky is an intellectual genius, but otherwise both he and Ken Livingstone are rabidly anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, pro Hamas jihadist degenerates. Today we are at the threshhold of World War lll and such moral cripples as Chomsky and Livingston would legitimize the pathology of the psychotic.

  • 87. 0 0
    to Nicole
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:37

    First, I am not making any excuse for any murder, I am just stating the fact, and that fact is, as long as there is an occupaiton, Israeli teror, and denial of our rights, there will be, unfortunately, people who willing to seek revenge to thier mothers, sisters, and babies. Which is better to call upon? is it the occupier to leave us alone, or to call upon us to stop resistinhg while our lands is under a colonial power? strange indeed?

  • 86. 0 0
    Ahmad, wrong in every way
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:37

    Ahmad, You are wrong in every way. First, way more than 2,000 Israelis have been killed since the start of Oslo, so your figure is wrong. Secondly, you count all adult Israelis as "legitimate" targets. This is morally wrong and factually wrong. Lastly, your logic is faulty. You try to say that since there are approximately 6 factions, the number of attacks should be divided (despite the obvious fact that one group could be responsible for the majority of attacks). You also overlook the fact that Hamas and the Palestinians decided to start this latest round of war, thefore they are the aggressors and are responsible for all of the deaths (Palestinian and Israeli). Arafat could have made peace in 2000, but he chose more war and more money for Suha living Paris. I don't blame you for your faulty logic or faulty facts. You are a Palestinian who has been raised on a diet of anti-Semitism since birth. Maybe you even want to see your mother and sister forced to cover-up from head to toe by Hamas. The question is, is that what your mother and sister want?

  • 85. 0 0
    Ken The Jew Hater
    • Dan
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:36

    Shame on the people of London for electing this racist to power. Smart guy though. He knows that his thinly veiled Jew-hatred probabably goes over well in Londonarabia (is an election year near?). The Arabs love Ken. He's one of theirs. No need to condemn the mass murder of Muslim Arabs by their fellows Muslim Arabs in Syria, Jordan, Algeria, Iraq (yes, I know, I've missed many Muslim Arab countries by you get the idea). No. Much like his Arab friends, Ken The Jew Hater would like nothing better than to see Israel obliterated from the earth. One expects Ken to graduate and next compare the Nazi party to Likud. The Arabs would love that. Here's hoping that Israel's example of targeted killings of human vermin terrorists becomes global and that countries engaged in the fight against these demonic barbarians, devoid of souls and humanity, adopt this strategy. The only good terrorist wanna be is a dead one.

  • 84. 0 0
    to ahmed
    • shlomie
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:33

    tell me why is every terrorist in the world muslim dosent that tell you something about your religion ?

  • 83. 0 0
    Once A European Always A European
    • M Zeldis
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:31

    "The comparison drawn by the mayor of London was grave and inappropriate," Sharon said. "It indicates ignorance and a basic misunderstanding of reality." No Mr. Prime Minister. It indicates his basic anti-Semetic nature.

  • 82. 0 0
    What's the difference
    • Pt
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:28

    What?s the difference. If the tables were turned and Hamas had the arsenal that the Likud has (F-16?s, tanks etc.) and Israel was disarmed, there wouldn?t be any Jews left in the land. All would be dead or expelled, perhaps except for those who had lived in Palestine prior to 1918, and their descendents. Palestine would be an Islamic state, with no rights for women, or gays, or religious freedom for others; a theocracy that would make Israel?s current system look like and atheist convention by comparison. Meanwhile, under the Likud, with all its weapons, the Palestinian population is expanding, and prior to the last intifada (or rather series of war crimes) their economy was flourishing, even under the Netanyahu govt, and they are on their way to independence. Minor difference

  • 81. 0 0
    Shame Doctor
    • Mike
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:28

    The PLO was formed before the 67 war when Israel occupied the West Bank (which was not granted statehood by Arab countries during the almost 20 years after Israeli statehood.) Both the PLO and Hamas have hoped to anihilate Israel (not just seek freedom for Palestinians in the West Bank) and have murdered innocent Israelis and non-Israeli Jews for decades. Why aren't you demanding an apology from your leaders for murdering innocent Israelis? I suppose that even if you were inclined to ask for such an apology, you would probably refrain since you would be too fearful that you would get a knock on the door by a Hamas or PLO thug who would shot you in the head.

  • 80. 0 0
    to AHMED
    • Nicole
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:25

    Ahmed, There is no excuse for MURDER. Stop giving an excuse for murder. Hamas IS responsible for murdering thousands of innocent Israelis. Sitting in coffee shops, teenagers queing for a disco and people going to work on buses. PUT DOWN YOUR ARMS NOW and recognise Israel. You are not being fair to your people.

  • 79. 0 0
    Yair....Hussam.....Ahmad
    • Tity
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:21

    Hello everyone! Id like to thank Yair as you Yair say and write exactly the things i believe..even when im not around posting. Usually weekends Im away so i cant post but you are doing an excellent job in writing all the things i want to say..maybe next time put my name next to yours?? ;) Hussam....a hello to you and i just wanted to say once again that it is so honest of you to mention the word peace as i trully believe that its what you want! Ahmad...How are you? its been long time we hyavent talked! I have to agree with Yair on the 1st post that it was a bit harsh what you said but i agree not with the word charity, coz i know what you wanted to say... I wanted to tell you that i know that things are getting harder coz of the bombings of Al-Qaeda but dont ever stop saying you are an Arab, Muslim, Palestinian coz terror shouldnt scare you. You arent supposed to live racism just coz some **ckers bombed as you said NY, Madrid, London, Sharm el-Sheikh....for goodness sake! Believe me...the world needs to stop assimilationg everyone with terrorist acts...the world must stop accusing all Arabs of being terrorists...the world must stop accusing all Jews of supporting occupation in Israel, even when they dont live in Israel.... Can you see now?? These are the similarities im talking about....and please everyone in this forum find me 2 other people that have so many things in common as Jews and Arabs....please!! We are brothers and sisters...we will remain so! The ones of us who wish so in peace.... (by the way..im coming this Friday to Israel :)

  • 78. 0 0
    to Pround Zionists (I do not know why?)
    • Ahmad Abouali
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:21

    Sir: According to stats on the intifada, and prior to that at least since Hamas was founded in 1988, the total isaeli casualities did not surpass the 1500 number (prove me wrong), at least 60-65% of the dead were mature adults, while the rest were eldery and children, whereas there are half a dozen Palestinian factions whom are active against Israel, then we conlcude (again prove me wrong) 1500 X 35%=525 innocent Israelis 525 X 42% (Hamas' share)= 221 innocent Israelis Hamas killed in the past 17 years. vs. (in lebanon alone in 1982) over 25,000 Civilians were killed and murdered (including Sabra and Shatila refugee camps) by the glorious IDF lead by Mr. Sharon. (just in one summer) Where did I go wrong, Mr. proud of yourself? therefore, Hams

  • 77. 0 0
    To Ahmad, you made a big mistake : hundred of millions...
    • Andre
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:17

    You stated : "the Zionist gangs and the Israeli overment hat murdered hundreds of thousands of Arabs". In fact they had murdered hundred of millions.

  • 76. 0 0
    Honest Ken Livingstone, I presume
    • Ken LeRoy
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:17

    Ken Livingston hit the nail on the head, and yes, he does think like a frenchman. After all we in Canada, believe that the jewish state has been leeching on Americans for over a century. Israel is truly "un petit pays merdeux" vraiement

  • 75. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone; Boycott
    • Mike
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:16

    I think that Jews worldwide should boycott travel to Britain until Mr. Blair condemns Livingston. What I also do not understand (I would appreciate if some of our Jewish friends in London could) is why there is not more protests of Livingstone by British Jews? If an anti-semite like Livingstone held an important office in the U.S., Jewish groups would make his life miserable.

  • 74. 0 0
    Wake up British subjects
    • Jerry Diamond
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:13

    It's amazing how every once in a while a politician gets into power and with that power they assume, they start to spew out their hate and venom that they have aquired over the years, with the more power that they assume. Hitler proved that theory with the German people and I have no doubt that given the chance Ken Livingstone would follow in his footsteps in a hearbeat.I'm sure that if he were asked he would probaly say that Hitler was a great man in his own way. You can not change the idealism of these kind of people. They are warped from the day they are born. All we can do is hope that the British people can see what a mad man they have elected and abolish him as quickly as possible!

  • 73. 0 0
    Sharon has no shame
    • the doctor
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:10

    a man with such a history http://www.counterpunch.org/sharon.html must be ashamed of what he had done to innocent poeple, at least when he is about to put a closure to his 77 years life, mostly, filled with hate, racism, and pure cold blooded murders. The man has no shame, I think he is the one who should appologize to his victims: the Arab poeples.

  • 72. 0 0
    Ahmad and honesty don't go together
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:10

    "the maximum Hamas can do in death is no more than few dozens, maybe two to three hundreds at the most. Verses the Zionist gangs and the Israeli overment hat murdered " This is the morality and honesty one often encounters on the Palestinian side. It isn't their fault, they have been brainwashed by their leaders and the media since birth to think this way. Sad...

  • 71. 0 0
    FRANZEN.Sabra and Shatlla was Arab killling Arab in revenge.
    • Peter S.M.
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:09

    Tell us how Sharon was the "coqueror of Sabra and Shatilla." Boy are you deperate. Sharon however was the conqueror of the Egyptian 3rd army.I know dont bother it was an "ARAB victory".

  • 70. 0 0
    Hamas IS murderous...Likud ISNT????
    • Tity
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:08

    "Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis," Sharon said in remarks broadcast Monday on Israel Radio. ------------------------------------------- Ok, so Ken Livingstone said what he said about Hamas and Likud...about the same side of the coin...this is partly true as we cant compare a terrorist or fighting group with a government. But i agree that they both have provoked immense casualties to the other side.. So as Mr. Sharon says that Hamas is a murderous organisation blah blah blah..Likud isnt?? I think that IDF takes orders from Likud and fires at Palestinians no??? I think that IDF takes orders from Likud and razes houses, curses, hit Palestinians, no??? I think that IDF takes orders from Likud and the Palestinians stay in checkpoints for long hours no???? Well...i guess maybe Kenny wanted to point out that they both have caused many casualties to each other. Okay, and maybe Kenny is anti-semite. I dont care if he is or he isnt... But i guess he wanted to show this similarity between the group and the government. Before Mr. Sharon speaks he should bare in mind that he is not that innocent and "dovish" and he should think first why such things are being said of his government and why this assimilation is made.... (Expansion of settlements...killing of innocents...etc..etc)

  • 69. 0 0
    #60 Franzen
    • MdV
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:07

    Are you aware of the stupidity of your post, I mean the content as well

  • 68. 0 0
    FRANZEN.The agressor is the one that calls for wars of annihilation.
    • Peter SM
    • 25.07.05
    • 14:04

    Your side. The side that uses children as human shields for Palestinian gunmen and suicide bombers.

  • 67. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • Mike
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:56

    Ken is making his on bed. By justifying suicide bombers in Israel he makes it easier for Islamic extremists to justify suicide bombing in London. What other weapon do dutiful young Muslims have to change British policies in Iraq, etc.? What amazes me is that he is not that he is anti-semetic (we have known for sometime), it is that he is so incredibly stupid. As for Tony Blair, he has tarnished his own reputation for not rebuking Livingstone.

  • 66. 0 0
    Franzen and Red Ken (perfect soulmates)
    • Proud Zionist
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:49

    Franzen and Red Ken are perfect together, neither of them has any real understanding of the Middle East, neither of them has been to the Middle East, and both of them are anti-Semites who are obsessed with demonizing the Jews (Franzen is the moderator of a discussion group that debated whether the Holocaust ever took place and he spends hours each day writing derogatory comments on this message board, while Red Ken invited known terrorists to London and called a Jew a "Nazi" for asking him a question). Perfect soulmates. Johanes, since you and Ken don't understand the difference, allow me to explain (maybe this will pierce your anti-Semitic mental armor, although I doubt it): Hamas is a paramilitary org. that exists outside of the Palestinian government deliberately. It's charter calls for the annihilation of Israel and Jews. The movement deliberately uses suicide bombers and shootings to target civilians. It tries to maximize civilian casualties on purpose. It is trying to impose a theocracy on the Palestinians. Almost no respectable Western politician will dare meet with the heads of Hamas. Contrarily, the Likud is a democratically elected party that is held fully accountable to the rules and laws of Israel. The Likud, under Sharon, has recognized the Palestinian right to a State and is currently withdrawing from Gaza. All Western countries rightfully recognize the Likud and Israel, even your beloved Swedes (and even Ken the raving anti-Semite). The Likud, unlike Hamas, doesn't operate a sovereign military org that is separate from the Israeli army. Israel, like all non-terror supporting states, has one army that is accountable to the rule of law and the people. That diverse army is made up of leftists, rightists, homosexuals, Ethiopians, religious, secular, Russians, men, women, etc, etc, etc. The Likud is a secular party that has zero interest in a theocracy being imposed. The Israeli army is used for defense, although it is regretable that is sometimes kills civilians (especially since terrorists base themselves among civilians). The IDF frequently tries soldiers who commit crimes. Have you ever heard of Hamas trying an "operative" for killing babies? We both know such a person is lionized and praised. Johanes, everyone on this forum knows you are biased and anti-Semitic. Give up the charade and use your time more wisely (maybe a 55 year-old like yourself should empty his heart of hate and spend more time with his three good-looking, blonde-haired children).

  • 65. 0 0
    #34 10% are muslims have you heard any condemn ken?????
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:43

    and all around there was a deathly hush!!!! perhaps another pro arab demo will take place in hyde park!!!!

  • 64. 0 0
    To Yair
    • Hussam
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:42

    Hi Yair, I wrote to you on the other article but was gone. Anyway, I'm sorry if I made you feel uncomfortable because at that time I was responding to someone who ticked me off. By the way my personal lawyer's name is Yair and he is Israeli, I have no problem dealing with Israelis at all. My stand is that both sides have a world-accpeted states side by side. Right now Palestinians have no state and Israel's current borders are not accepted by the world community, so why not work together on a genuine peace fair to both sides?

  • 63. 0 0
    #41 very interesting inaccurate rubbish ribbentrop
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:35

    this rubbish would be interesting if the majority population of israel were ashkenazi jews. since they are not it should be consigned to the trash can

  • 62. 0 0
    Moder is right
    • Baruch Goldstein
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:34

    Can't wait until 2050...could we bring the date forward?

  • 61. 0 0
    Ken Livinston
    • Jp
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:33

    Perhaps Mr Livingston romantically dreams of white-robed sheikhs slow-motion riding their camels. Perhaps Mr Livingston's perception of History does not go beyond Alan Quatermain. Perhaps Mr Livingston failed the mayorship aptitude test. Perhaps Mr Livingston has selectively erased the middle-east events of the last 40 years. Perhaps Mr Livingston is not educated enough to know the difference between a gang of terrorists and a democratic party. Perhaps Mr Livinston should listen to Jacques Chirac : "Il a perdu une bonne occasion de se taire! " ( He lost a fine opportunity to shut up ). Perhaps Mr Livingston is nothing but a minor mayor .

  • 60. 0 0
    Oleh Hadash-"I hope you get plenty more."-
    • JOHANES Franzen
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:32

    -"You have now had a small taste of Islamic terrorism... I hope you get plenty more. The main course still awaits you!"- You are aware that you are posting this on a public forum and that it will be brought to the attention of those that calls like this inflicts on? Your IP address will get registered and at any entery into the EU you will get arrested.

  • 59. 0 0
    to Nicole and all
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:28

    first, hamas is not responsible for the death of "THOUSANDS", all those who died, from the Israelis, were 950 persons, close to 65% where soldiers or on-call soldiers, AKA "reservists" and in israel reservist do work. and while hamas is not the only terrorist group working agianst Israel, it only shares 42% of the operations since its establishment in 1988, the maximum Hamas can do in death is no more than few dozens, maybe two to three hundreds at the most. Verses the Zionist gangs and the Israeli overment hat murdered hundreds of thousands of Arabs. the Likud do have the lion share in terror against Arabs lead, mainly, by Rik, the "king of Israel" (read about him on http://www.counterpunch.org/sharon.html ) As for the usage of the ward charity, it was used only for sercasim to deflate the "honor" of Likud and it's war against civilians idicted leader, Sharon. ;)

  • 58. 0 0
    Blaming the other guy thousands of miles away
    • Eric Wilson
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:24

    Sharon's response is a distraction ment for Israeli public consumption, not British. That Said. Who is this mayor. He should worry more about his people not blowing his other citizens up then giving his analysis of the political parties of the Palestinians and the Israelis. If he would like to engage in foreign policy, I suggest he scrutinize Pakistan since they seem to export violence to his shores.

  • 57. 0 0
    Double standard
    • Paul
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:24

    It cannot be said that Israel is innocent of human rights abuses against the Palestinians just as it cannot be said that suicide bombings are ever justified under any circumstance . Livingstone was just pointing out that it's a vicious cycle for which both parties are at fault and for which innocent human beings on both sides suffer. Criticims of the Israeli government's human rights record cannot always be equated with anti-jewish sentiment. It is far too easy to rebuke such criticism is this way rather than to admit the facts. Given their unfortunate past, Israelis should know better than to objectify human life in this way... If we want other to acknowledge our suffering we must acknoledge the suffering of others...or at least refrain from causing it ourselves.

  • 56. 0 0
    # 42
    • Nicole
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:23

    Why dont you blame Eli Hobeka and his Phalange Militia. They are the ones that did the murdering in Sabra and Shatila. I only ever hear you mentioning Prime Minister Sharon.

  • 55. 0 0
    FRANZEN & MORALITY
    • Warren
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:22

    i am lead to believe that you have never been to the palestinian territories or in fact the mid east, is that in fact correct? that being the case, as you sit in your home in stockholm, sitting at your desk with your portrait of david irving hanging proudly on the wall, you consistently send in utter b...hit to these forums... the irony is you actually KNOW NOTHING, NOTHING.

  • 54. 0 0
    to Yair & Ahmad
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:21

    Yair i used the word "charity" is to make fun of terrorist Sharon and his "peace loving Likud", the only inheritent of Stern, Lehi and Irgun terror gangs. Hamas, when compared to the Zionists gagns such as the ones above, indeed, is a small fish in the game of terror, therefore, I say to Sharon and his supporters to have some shame and shut the .... up. Ahmad I used to live in the West for over 21 years, and I hear you loud and clear, I was there when 9/11 happned, and I know what the racist Europeans had done to us all, but, we shall not waiver to their racism, nor to that, to the idiots who come and blow themselves up amongst civilians in London and Madrid. As much as we can not blame the Jews in the West for Sharon's atrocities, we shall stand firm in distinguishing ourselves from the morons of Alqaeda

  • 53. 0 0
    Thanks to Ken
    • M
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:20

    20 years ago Sharon was the one who did Sabra and Chatila (more then 2000 women and kids) and now the one who decided to build up a wall of horror. How many of those are supporting Sharon on this forum have been in West Bank to see how Palestinian live behind the wall... I thank London mayor's who made a so appropriate comment, he is not antisemite, he is criticizing the govern of Sharon (who also kicked off the second intifada) not Israel, and it is unbelieveble that any word said against the terrible politic of Israel is considered racist and anitsemit, This is the real scapegoat for the terror provoked by people like Sharon.

  • 52. 0 0
    British hypocrisy
    • Oleh Hadash
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:20

    British hypocrites! You have reacted in a savage and violent way, shooting an unarmed and defenseless man five times in the head while he was lying on the ground! When British troublemaker Tom Hurndall was shot while in a COMBAT ZONE in Gaza, when he inserted himself into the middle of a firefight between Israeli troops and Palestinian "militants", the British government condemned Israel and vented its usual anti-Semitic vitriol against us. But when you Brits MURDER INNOCENT CIVILIANS in cold blood in your oh-so-sophisticated and advanced tube stations, that is OK. I hope that the "officers" (more like British thug murderers) involved are imprisoned, and that the victim's family takes the British state to the cleaners in court. You are a sick nation of hypocrites, robbers and Jew-haters. AM YISRAEL CHAI! PS You have now had a small taste of Islamic terrorism... I hope you get plenty more. The main course still awaits you!

  • 51. 0 0
    TO MADIE
    • Nicole
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:19

    You want to reap the results of your suicide bombings but dont forget none of you will be going to heaven for your sins as you are brainwashed to think. I am sure that G-D will make sure that you will be going directly down to hell for murder of the worst inhuman kind.

  • 50. 0 0
    TO AHMED
    • Nicole
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:17

    Hamas is responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women and children. If that is your idea of a charity then there is NO HOPE.

  • 49. 0 0
    Tony Blair
    • Tulip
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:15

    Ken probably can keep on making those comparisons because Tony Blair is not in the position right now to contradict him. He himself is under much pressure and can not afford to alienate from politcal leaders abroad. I am afraid for a longer period of time nuances will have to be found with a magnifier. Ronnie, do you ever sleep???? Isn't it 5 a.m. in Toronto?

  • 48. 0 0
    true colours
    • J Hyman
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:14

    At last we see the side of Mr Livingstone that everyone in this side of the world already new. A true anti-semite who is allowed by this government to spout the same rubbish that we are asking the muslim community to distance themselves from. He must be removed and I ask all the jews and non jews alike to stand up and be heard, that this will not be tolerated.

  • 47. 0 0
    where's the difference?
    • JOHANES Franzen
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:10

    "Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis," "The Likud is a murderous terrorist organization which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Palestinians" Sounds like two sides of the same coin with the only difference that one is the aggressor and the other the defender. The Israelis have murdered five times as many children. Says it all really. The current IDF head honcho( and at the time IAF chief) said when asked how he felt about the killing of 11 children by a deliberate targeting of them "I feel a light bump when the bomb is released, that's all I feel" Arik "Conquerer of Sabra& Shatila" Sharon on the other hand went one step futher and called it "A Great Success". "Terrorists"? you bet.

  • 46. 0 0
    Ken DEADstone
    • Ilan
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:09

    I want to see Ken's facial expression after the 100th suicide bombing of the London Transit system... At that point, he would stop equating Likud to Hamas, come to his senses, but be too ashamed to withdraw his previous remarks. I wish for all Londoners that it won't take another 99 (or 98?) suicide bombings to have their mayor become a realistic, non-anti-semitic, human being.

  • 45. 0 0
    workless
    • Ahmed
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:06

    Ahmad, My problem with this speach is that today Islam is becoming evil all over Europe. It is becoming more difficult for us to work because people are linking terror and muslims. We muslims don't dare to say in our own community that terror is wrong and related to a fanatic group of muslims.

  • 44. 0 0
    Chafeeka- Are you from Ethiopia??
    • Hussam
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:04

    Because if you are, then you need to remember who colonized africa from top to buttom in the 19th and 20th century. If I'm not wrong I think it was the West. The West conquered Africa and America (Christians) not Muslims.

  • 43. 0 0
    Ahmad #26
    • Yair
    • 25.07.05
    • 13:03

    Dear Ahmad, If you've read any of my earlier postings, you will know that I'm not big on defending Israeli policies. Anyhow, your message does worry me. I'm the first one to acknowledge Israel's racist-style policies towards the Palestinians and the war crimes committed by many of its leaders. But your way of depicting Hamas, I'm sorry, seems very one-sided. Before you give me a list of every horror the Israeli government has inflicted on the Palestinian people, please realise that I'm not into denying these things. I will probably agree with you on most of them. But Hamas has also murdered thousands of people. Moreover it has managed to create a situation in which most Israelis are so filled with paranoia that taking a bus, going to a restaurant, entering a club, going shopping at the market, entering a cinema etc. has become a most fearful experience. I'm not saying that Israel has not committed similar crimes, but likening Hamas to a Charity Organisation... I'm sorry, but it has destroyed to many lives for that. A Peace-Now Member

  • 42. 0 0
    ABOUT THE STRUGGLE FOR ISLAM'S SOUL
    • Joachim Martillo
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:50

    ABOUT THE STRUGGLE FOR ISLAM'S SOUL Like ZIAUDDIN SARDAR in The New Statesman (http://www.newstatesman.com/nscoverstory.htm), the western-educated Lebanese that run The Daily Star also shout the standard battle-cries of anti-Islamic demonization (see http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=17&article_id=16760). Of course, there are elements of Lebanese communal politics in such a column, but the editor's views probably result mostly from colonization of the mind. Karen Armstrong notes in The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1525714,00.html) that Islamic fundamentalist terror has little connection to Muslim faith. This terrorist program results from a volatile combination of generic religious nativism, communalist primordialism and reaction to Western modernity. A similar collection of phenomena appeared at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century especially in Central and Eastern Europe. In those days the radical ideological brew also included economic revolutionism, ethnic fundamentalism and organic nationalism. Today's popular misnomer of Islamic terror is not as unprecedented as Karen Armstrong argues. Ninety years ago the bogeyman of Judeobolshevik terrorism was a major component of political, popular and academic discourse. Honest historians will admit that there was a lot more truth in this historical anti-Semitic slur than there is in modern anti-Muslim terminology even if the vast majority of ethnic Ashkenazim of that time period were neither Bolsheviks nor Communists. Yet Bolshevism was not the only murderous and radical ideology to take root among ethnic Ashkenazim back then. Stanislawski's Zionism and the Fin de Siecle points out that Herzl, Nordau and Jabotinski, who were the three main founders and creators of Zionist ideology, were strongly attracted to the anti-Semitic mindset. They planted the seeds of an ethnic Ashkenazi variant of such violent, racist and irrational thinking in Zionist ideology. The crop that has germinated from their seminal ideas has reached full bloom in the ongoing anti-Islamic demonization that racist Zionist colonizers and racist ethnic Ashkenazim are incessantly distributing throughout Western and world media. As a consequence, racist ethnic Ashkenazim and Zionist colonizers provide yet another example of the common historical pattern where the descendants of a victimized population become themselves a population of victimizers. The material that the professional anti-Islamists produce today even almost exactly duplicate the titles of works from professional Judeophobes of the past. Probably with no awareness of his far more learned but similarly malicious forerunner, Robert Spencer called his recently published collection of anti-Islamic bigotry Islam Unveiled, a title that has a striking resemblance to Entdecktes Judentum (Judaism Revealed), the name Eisenmenger chose for his epic screed against Judaism and Jewry. Just as Serbs, who viewed themselves as victims of genocide during WW2, fell so easily into a murderous victimization mode during the 1990s, likewise today racist ethnic Ashkenazim and racist Zionist colonizers, who are descended from the victims of incitement that lead to genocide, are now major purveyors or encouragers(*) of very similar incitement against Arabs and Muslims. (*) Spencer is not ethnic Ashkenazi, but most of his readership is.

  • 41. 0 0
    kens comments
    • sj
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:49

    Insome ways Ken has a point, terrorism can also be defined as state run terrorism which is exzactly how Sharon and his bunch of corrupt politicians operate.

  • 40. 0 0
    Lying Ken implies Palestinians don't have Qassams,mortars,rpg's,Kalashnikovs.
    • Peter SM
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:49

    "Only their bodies" What a liar!.No wonder he appeals to the Islamofascist/uberleft alliance.

  • 39. 0 0
    Ken : how does he dare ?
    • Bloemfontein
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:42

    Ken questions the use of military aircrafts and tanks against the Palestinian civilians. How does he dare to do this. Doens't he know that the Palestinians with their small number can exterminate all the israelis, and then, if all the Israelis with their atomic bombs and bombers die, there will be no one to live in Palestine, the promised land of all the Jews of the World ? Doesn't he know that the children killed today by Israeli soldiers will grow one day and will become bombers who will kill other Israelis ? The Israelis are poor people, they are a people without land who came to a land without people. Indeed, Ken Livingstone is lying. The israelis don't kill anyone, because, anyway, Palestine is a land without people, and in a land without people there is no one to kill ...

  • 38. 0 0
    Mr Livingstone: apologist for terrorists
    • Catch22
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:38

    Implication: Mr Livingston justifies the London bombings."Given that the [London Bombers] don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons," "In an unfair balance, that's what people use"

  • 37. 0 0
    Ken is right
    • Maddie
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:36

    Ken is right. We Arabs don't have the billion-dollar weapon systems of the West so we must use what we have. The asymmetry is unfair, and we won't rest until we drag the rest of the world to our technological and social level. We are tired of being humiliated as if we are all suicide bombers. We couldn't be - someone has to send the bombers, and someone has to reap the results.

  • 36. 0 0
    Shut up, Sharon!
    • ahmad
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:34

    Hamas is a charty organization, like Mother Teresa Order, when compared to Likud, its policies and its ugly past. we all know most of the Likud's leaders were wanted terrorists , or indicted war criminals ( Sharon, Begin and Shamir), let alone the racist and illegal acts of such party before and after the erection of Israel. It is enough (not limited to) that the Likud government, lead then by Begin and Shamir (two indicted and wanted terrorists) to have an army, lead then by Sharon, to be invloved in a civlian slaughter of thousands of innocent Palestinians. If I were sharon, I should thank Mr. Livingstone in comparing me to Hamas, a "charity" in comparision

  • 35. 0 0
    bravo Paulo
    • Salamaan
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:29

    Killing innocent civilians, whether Israeli or British, is wrong. Calling one one thing and the other another thing because one victim is an Israeli and the other is a Brit is as Paulo pointed out wrong and racist. I just hope Ken Livingstone doesn't represent the population of London ...

  • 34. 0 0
    Livingstone ignorant?He is a groveller and appeaser a la Chamberlin.!
    • Peter S.M.
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:27

    He also plays to his power base to get re-elected,even if it encourages the terrorists against his own country. Sharon is too diplomatic.!

  • 33. 0 0
    Ken and Islamicc terrorism
    • Sarah Howard
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:23

    Ken is only playing to his constituency. He is a very savvy politician and with a large percentage of his electorate being muslims, his anti-semitic and anti-Israel views gain him enormous approval ratings amongst the muslims. The British terrorists did not grow up in a vacuum, the probably dominant view amongst muslims in Britain is that they have a lot of sympathy for the aims of the British terrorists. When I have spoken frankly to muslim youth in London it is incredible what hatred they harbour against the British government and English people. They also never hide their fervent hatred for Jews. Wake up world - the London population is going to be dominantly muslim in twenty years time. The London assembly might even proclaim a Sharia state in London. I am seriously not joking. There is huge immigration of muslims to London. Muslim families are on average huge - about six kids (many of twelve or more) and almost all muslims import their spouses from abroad. Hence a family of six children are six future families not three. The muslims also marry young. The girls often marry at sixteen or even earlier if sent away to Pakistan or Bangladesh to marry earlier. I think that within twenty years there will no longer be enough toleration for Jews in London to carry on as a community. Many muslim youth tell me (not knowing that I am Jewish) that they would like to kill the Jews. I am telling you the frank truth no matter that many readers will recoil and want to deny it. The truth is that London Jews should not be complacent, they should start packing their bags and moving to Israel to save themselves and their children. Instead Jews sit in Golders Green and pretend London is a tolerant place with a great future for them - oh how wrong they are!

  • 32. 0 0
    End of round one! Ken, Ariel, back to your corners, please.
    • David McC
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:14

    Ariel (in the blue corner) wins this round on points, but it was no knock-out. Ken (red corner) has less experience at this level of boxing, but has a history of coming back off the ropes.

  • 31. 0 0
    Qui tacet, consentire videtur
    • Lior
    • 25.07.05
    • 12:14

    Ken Livingstone has always been remarkably exercised by foreign affairs for a mere mayor. Instead of pitting what passes for his mind against the challenges of main drainage and u-bends, he consorted with the IRA during their 30 year terror war against Britain, he pronounces on Iraq, he condescends toward Israel. Is there no end to his crass and impertinent meddling? In the past, he would already have been charged with sedition. His actions are clearly in breach of our constitution. But who stops him? I can only invoke the principle of "qui tacet, consentire videtur" - silence gives consent - and assume that by their mute silence, Blair and members of his government not only condone but share his views. Traitors all...

  • 30. 0 0
    racist livingstone
    • paulo2005
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:53

    livingstone is wrong. when suicide bombers do attack the israeli transport system this is what livingston does say: "Given that the Palestinians don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons," Livingstone told Sky News in an interview. "In an unfair balance, that's what people use," said Livingstone, who has often been strongly critical of Israel in the past. ( Haaretz ). When suicide bombers attack the BRITISH transport system , this is what livingston did say: This was an attack on ordinary working Londoners. Black and white. Christian and Muslim. Hindu and Jew?. An indiscriminate attempt to slaughter as many people as possible?..? Statement by Ken Livingstone, broadcast on BBC Radio 4, 7 July 2005 ``If you are dealing with someone who might be a suicide bomber, if they remain conscious, they could trigger plastic explosives or whatever device is on them,'' said London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who praised the swift action of the police, (When it did shoot an individual in the london underground ) . ``Therefore overwhelmingly in these circumstances it is going to be a shoot-to-kill policy.'' -Livingstone said july 22 (See the link bellow ). http://www.hindu.com/2005/07/23/stories/2005072316101200.htm This is pure racism. Livingstone does not condemn an attack because it does target civilian population . He does does condemn or support an action , based on the nationality of the victims. If the victims are israelis , Livingstone shows some sympathy towards the suicide bombers. If the victims live in london livingstone supports a policy of shoot and kill . Livinstone is a racist.

  • 29. 0 0
    we love you ken
    • joe barnathan
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:48

    we love you for showing the world what a true antisemite is. You are a perfect example of a antisemite even though you and israel both share a common enemy islamic terrorist you find fault in the jews, you where visited by a true mayor when the monsters bombed your transit system his name is MAYOR RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI. when the saudi prince tried to connect the 9/11 atack to the israel arab conflict he gave back his 10 million dollar donation check

  • 28. 0 0
    Sharon is Great Part II
    • Ronnie Wolman (aka mytottenham@yahoo.com)
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:44

    Sharon has plonked himself in the centre,in a area where most Israelis are,which is good,but a political place that is the most challenging. Popular with the populace,it is isolated in a way from the political spectrum.Where no extreme either side is your defender. Where one can be accused of zig zagging,but this IS the avenue of movement,between the soft left and the soft right. No wonder he attacked Red Ken and Orange Likud,THEY are two sides of the same coin to HIM.

  • 27. 0 0
    Occupied North Ireland
    • Josef
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:38

    Why is the Mayor of London critcal of Israel's responce to terrorist when he is silent about Britian' long military responce to holding Northern Ireland. He champions the cause of the Palestinian bombers; are they the same as the bombers of the IRA,Provo etc. The IRA did not have airplanes or tanks. It is different when it is Jewish blood being spilled. What is the difference in Occupied Territory? North Ireland or Judea/Sumaria? For that matter the leftist propaganda about "Occupied Territory" England has a long history of occuping other land..The Sun Never Sets on The British Empire! They still hold Occupied Territory, i.e. Diego Garcia and what about the island they went to war with Argentina? He who is with out sin cast the first stone..Red Ken. will probably blame the London bombings on Jews, Israel ..they were not terrorist just "Militants" using there suicide tanks! While were at "Occupied Territory" what about Occupied Texas!; American settlers took it from Mexico in 1836 and the Mexican American War of 1845; they took California,New Mexico, Arizona, parts of Colorado,Utah...and kept TEXAS. Maybe Red Ken will champion the Mexicans,American Indians and tell the world that President George Bush lives on "Occupied Territory". His ranch is an ILEGAL settlement and should be referred to the Unitied Nations! Shalom Ya All!

  • 26. 0 0
    Livingstone The Rabid Anti Semite
    • Shlomie
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:37

    As a Londoner i feel ashamed to call Livingstone "MY" Mayor. His comments and political views have crossed the border of a preacher to all evil, yet no one in the British Govornment will do anything to stop him. I find that quite unreal for a western society to put up with his "HITLERIST" views. I just wish that he would spend a few nights with his arab "FRIENDS" in Ramalla. He'd soon come around !!!

  • 25. 0 0
    Sharon?
    • An IDF soldier
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:31

    You know I seldom agree with Sharon, but in this case I could not have expressed my feelings any better. This just proves that the Jews are once again a scapegoat for any thing wrong that happens in the world, nothing has changed.

  • 24. 0 0
    Like its going to make any difference
    • Eva
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:30

    Ken Livingstone does not give a toss what Sharon (who he has marked as a Butcher/Terrorist/Warlord) thinks or says in response to his Hamas comparisons. He formed his opinions about Israel -and many other things- years ago and will not bend them. Isn't it great that such intelligent people who have sight of their own humility are running London and the rest of the world? At least Sharon admits his mistakes.

  • 23. 0 0
    Sharon the Great
    • Ronnie Wolman (aka mytottenham@yahoo.com)
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:26

    Sharon is great. Using Ken Livingstone as foil and balance for his remarks he scolded the right for 'their extremist policies'.In effect making not the comparison that the London Mayor made between Likud and Hamas but drawing extremist to extremist nevertheless. Sharon not perfect,but in position if the Palestinians so choose,to move to a real peace deal,at times using Peres as his foil and if not to be the defensive hero making security the best it can be under the circumstances. The man is deft,strong,smart and wont be pushed around by anyone,including the United States and a real Israeli Hero. I disliked his Temple Mount walk,thinking it a walk of the right. But it was a walk of frustration at the left for their inneptness. Yes that walk was a challenge to the Palestinians.They took the gauntlet as a threat and started intifada 2. The gauntlet is still down,but with it is a dove. I say to the Palestinians choose the gauntlet or the dove. Please pick the right one.

  • 22. 0 0
    Sharon failed
    • Chiva
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:25

    "Hamas is a murderous terrorist organization, which has murdered and wounded of thousands of Israelis," Sharon said in remarks broadcast Monday on Israel Radio. now exchange Hamas for IDF and Israelis for Palestinians and the sentence makes just as much sense. If Sharon tried to demonstrate the difference between Likud and Hamas by saying that, he utterly failed. Every international organization's death numbers of Israeli and Palestinian civilian casualties over the last years show Israel leading that sad statistic by a large margin.

  • 21. 0 0
    the reality behind Ken Livingstone
    • Londoner
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:25

    Ken Livingstone achieved prominence inside the Labour party in the early seventies as a protege of the Trotskyite leader of Lambeth council, Ted Knight. Both of these individuals entered the Labour party as agents/supporters of the Workers Revolutionary Party with the knowledge that they would never be able to achieve political influence if they stood for election on laughable WRP policies. Ken believes, as all good Trots do that the state of Israel should never have come into existence and therefore supports its total and utter destruction, no matter what the cost in human terms. Ken Livingstone hides behind a socialist and human face whilst surreptitiously propagating a policy of genocide for all those Jews who live within Israel?s border. this is the reality of Ken.

  • 20. 0 0
    ken is right
    • moder
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:23

    how else would you expect the palestinans from stopping israel from destroying them.?? at the current rate of expansion the palestinans would probably be wiped out by 2050 !!

  • 19. 0 0
    London Mayor's Koo Koo Friend
    • Chafeeka
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:23

    are we surprised? of course not. Livingstone is a good friend with Qaradawi whose goals are consistent with orthodox jihad ideology?he says ?We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America!?. In light of the London bombings, will the West?s intellectuals finally awaken to this threat?the jihad? Will they study with seriousness and urgency the theological-juridical underpinnings of the Islamic jihad, and its 14 centuries of brutal, imperialistic conquests, continuing through the present? Hope springs eternal. Londoners should ask their mayor to resign and throw him head first into a mental institution

  • 18. 0 0
    Arik's Mistake
    • Michael Steiner
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:22

    Arik shouldn't have honored that rat with any kind of response. Livingstone has proven time and again that logic, sense, knowledge and reason are beyond him. In his obtuse pronouncements he is guided solely by blind ideology. And, of course, if he didn't constantly bitch at Israel, then he wouldn't be very "red" anymore, would he. He's an insignificant little man; it's best to ignore him.

  • 17. 0 0
    The Mayor of London Applauds Terror in Israel
    • Pablo
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:15

    It will be interesting to see whether Londoners have the guts to object to these outrageous and misleading remarks made by their elected representative. I've come to expect this kind of insanity from an aimless nut, however, for an elected Mayor to make these remarks in public, tells you something about Londoners. He may be a lunatic, but he is a politician and he must have considerable support for his remarks. Especially after the bombings there...DO NOT COUNT ON EUROPE FOR ANYTHING GOOD. The thing about the withdrawal from Gaza is: once it occurs, all of these people are going to put endless pressure on Israel to make further one sided concessions, it will never end. You can count on increased deadly terror. The withdrawal from Gaza, seems to be an error. If Israelis do not stop it, then they will have no one to blame but themselves when things go sour. Even Barak says Israel is getting nothing in return. I would disagree, it is a high negative return.

  • 16. 0 0
    Not "Ignorance" but "Maliciousness"
    • Al Lawrence
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:07

    No, Ken is not "ignorant". He is an indoctrinated leftist fool who above all, hates Israel. All his comments regaring Israel are malicious, full of venom and double-speak. It is clear that he is after the Leftist, Arab and Islamic electorate in London. If you want a definition of "maliciousness" here here it is (from allwords.com): ----------------------------- 1. Feeling, or motivated by, hatred or by a desire to cause harm. 2. Deliberately vicious, spiteful or cruel. Thesaurus: spiteful, vengeful, vindictive, pernicious, hateful, vicious, baleful, catty; Antonym: benevolent, well-meaning. ------------------------------ Yes, it really describes Ken's attitude towards Israel. Shame on him and may he suffer too for as long there is suffering in the Middle East.

  • 15. 0 0
    Non violence is more effective
    • George
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:07

    The anti-Semitic mayor of London does not know his own history. In India where the "balance was unfair" to use his terms, the only effective resistance was not the random murder of civilian English occupiers, but the non-violent movement of Ghandi. The Indians also "used their bodies" to fight for their beliefs and won. If the Palestinians had enough courage and less hate in their hearts, they too could bring Israel to its knees through non-violent protests and strikes. This is what the idiotic mayor of London should have suggested - but he too is blinded by hate.

  • 14. 0 0
    Wonders never Cease
    • M. Jacob
    • 25.07.05
    • 11:00

    How is it that Mr. Blair who is such an intelligent Prime Minister, that has such an IGNORANT man for Mayor of London. Really!!!

  • 13. 0 0
    If I were Sharon, I will shut up
    • Ahmad S. Abouali
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:55

    Sharon must be the first one to disappear in the fog of london and never show his ugly face again. What Mr. Livingstone had said really was unfair to Hamas, nor to the Likud's criminal prestn and past, and when we compare the two, Hamas will emerg as a member of Mother Teresa Order. Hamas never held a government that committed wholesale sluaghter against the Palestinians in Sabra and Shatila camps in 1982, nor had any PM whom was a wanted terrorist, like Begin and Shamir, in that breath, Hamas leadership, not one, was indicted by any court for 'aiding a wholsalre slaughter of innocent civilian refugees' like Ariel Sharon was (is). The likud's criminal reocrd includes (but not limited to) 1-Irgus, stern, and Lehi terror orgs were wanted, not just by the Brits, they were despised by their own co-criminals; the Haganh, the core of the so called IDF. 2-The Likuds's past formatioms (the tri gangs) were indicted by killing and murdering thousands of Palestinian civilians. 3-the Trio were (one of them, I think!) was/were repsonsible of King David hotel's massacre in which over 70 British officers and Arabs died. 4-The same Zionist terrorists, were proud in assassinating Lord Bernadotte, the UN special envoey to the area, prior to he erection of Israel. 5-It was the Likud governments the violated all international laws by creating colonies across the west bank, Gaza, and the golan. I do not want to go aqny further, but before the Israelis (and the Likud) cry foul, they must look hard at their own, and appologize to Hamas for its charity work when it compare to Likud's terror and criminal naure.

  • 12. 0 0
    Mayor Ken Livingstone
    • Michael Fishman
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:52

    On 7/7 haing initially donned the mantle of New York's Rudi Juliani, Mayor Livingstone subsequently decided he was becoming too much establishment and in danger of losing his street cred. Almost two weeks to the day, he rushed aound the nation's news programmes offering inane excuses for the bombers actions. The following day, the terrorists showed their contempt for his "understanding" by attempting to once again to destroy the Underground system, to which Mayor Livingstone is prioritising so much public money to modernise. In this case they are correct, he deserves nothing but universal contempt.

  • 11. 0 0
    Sharon slams London mayor's 'ignorance' on Hamas and Likud
    • hugh reilly
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:47

    Ken Livingstone spoke for millions worldwide. The continuing occupation, the ever increasing settlements, the denial of palestinians to have a contiguous state ("Ariel will always be part of Israel" - Sharon)are all the responsibility of the Isreali government. Arafat was the problem, according to Likud. He's gone but Sharon won't negotiate with Abbas, Queri or whoever the Palestinians elect. It would seem that Israelis feel suicide bombings is a price worth paying for the dream of Greater Israel.

  • 10. 0 0
    Sharon & ken the raving red
    • AbY
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:34

    One would hope that on his next visit to britain that Arik will NOT meet with that moron livingstone. To be truthful, given the brits attitude to ISRAEL & their handling of the whole 'Mid East' situation from the beginning I cannot understand the ISRAELI "love" for things british. Witness our purchasing crappy films & weak, infantile TV series like mr bean from them. And not to forget sky/bbc's one sided biased news coverage. Though I realise this is the wrong place, given that most of the people who read this are english, to promote a boycott of british films, etc. But @ least think about it!!

  • 9. 0 0
    Ken's right
    • Chomsky
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:32

    They both need each other to survive.

  • 8. 0 0
    what else to be said of this ignorant slob red ken
    • paul harris
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:30

    the disgrace is thta he ahs not been removed from public office and HAS NOT BEEN CONDEMNED BY HIS PARTY AND TONY BLAIR !!!

  • 7. 0 0
    let Kenny speak
    • Avram
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:25

    he's just given the radical element within his Muslim community the token to act and do as they please to fulfill whatever goals they have for England.

  • 6. 0 0
    red ken
    • sir winston
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:18

    balestinians had tanks and jet plains in 1948, 1956,1967,1973,1982...it didn't help them much...but no one remembers red ken and his buddies raising their voice against it then... he is a tipical euro-liberal, almost french in his convictions.

  • 5. 0 0
    Ken Livingstone
    • Mike Davis
    • 25.07.05
    • 10:14

    Mayor Livingsyone's remarks are most apposite. When I lived in Israel, and served in Zahal, the Likud always struck me as the 'Israeli Hamas'. A minority always babbled about 'kicking the arabs out'and very few of the majority thought this was not a good a idea. As for Terrorism...how would Likudnikim describe the bombing of the King David hotel and the Lavon Affair? They were necessary? Hamas also describes their terrorism as necessary. Mayor Livingstone got it right, although he does not support suicide bombing.(sorry to introduce a FACT into your story.)

  • 4. 0 0
    LIVINGSTONE MAKES ME SICK
    • Nicole
    • 25.07.05
    • 09:41

    Ken does it again. He is so ignorant he makes me want to vomit. He is from the same ilk as all the other loony lefts especially from the London School of Economics and the ISM.

  • 3. 0 0
    still waiting
    • saul a. readner
    • 25.07.05
    • 09:39

    where is the outcry of ken livingstone against london's police in particular and the british state in general following the targeted assassination of an alleged terrorist in london who turned out to be no terrorist at all?!? where are the big newspaper headlines condemning this behaviour of great britain in the same harsh way they condemn israel when she hits -real- terrorists in preemptive strikes?!? where is the voice of amnesty international, human rights watch etc. etc. against these "violation of human rights" by london's police?!? i'm still waiting for the loud outcry! but probably it will not come - due to the double standard of this world!

  • 2. 0 0
    Prime Minister Sharon slams Red Ken.
    • David Nigel Braham
    • 25.07.05
    • 09:29

    What do you expect from a man,who is a communist at heart,an antisemite at heart and is a big fan of murdering suicide bombers. He has encouraged these people to murder in Netanya,sharm el sheik and of course Bagdad. Mr Livingstone,you should be charged with aiding and abetting.

  • 1. 0 0
    Sharon said it best...
    • Daniel
    • 25.07.05
    • 09:27

    "It indicates ignorance and a basic misunderstanding of reality"