• Published 00:00 21.11.07
  • Latest update 00:00 21.11.07

Rice: U.S. will try to close Israeli-Palestinian peace deal in the next year

U.S. Secretary of State cautions there is no guarantee of success; Bush calls Olmert, Abbas to discuss summit.

By The Associated Press Tags: Annapolis conference US Condoleezza Rice Middle East peace

United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday the U.S. will try to close a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians before President George W. Bush's term ends in January 2009, but she cautioned there is no guarantee of success.

Rice said Israeli and Palestinian leaders have pledged to work for a deal setting up an independent Palestinian state before Bush leaves office.

"We all know how long that is - it's about a year," Rice told reporters. "That's what we will try to do."

Rice said success is not guaranteed during that period.

Rice and Bush are hosting Israeli and Palestinian leaders next week in Washington and at an international conference in Annapolis, the capital of Maryland. The conference is aimed at launching the first direct negotiations on a peace deal in seven years.

Rice said the Annapolis session is an important launching pad for talks to settle Israel's conflict with the Palestinians and the two nations' disputes over land, statehood and rights.

Rice added that the United States will give room for other conflicts to be aired at Annapolis, including Syria's dispute with Israel over the Israeli-held Golan Heights.

She did not say exactly who will attend, and the guest list is not expected to be final until this weekend.

Bush called Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday to discuss the conference. The U.S. president also phoned Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak about the session, the White House said.

Egypt is one of only two Arab states that have negotiated peace deals with Israel, and the country is serving as something of a go-between for other Arab nations in the run-up to Annapolis. Egypt has pledged to attend.

The invitations to the three-day session went out Tuesday after months of intense diplomacy. The Bush administration announced few details beyond the dates and a cursory schedule.

The two sides are expected to present a joint statement on resuming peace talks at Annapolis, yet less than a week before their delegations are to arrive in the United States, the document exists only in vague form.

Rice said the document's focus changed during weeks of preliminary meetings between Olmert and Abbas and ultimately became less important as the two leaders decided between them that they wanted to begin full negotiations.

The conference will be anchored around a marathon session next Tuesday at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, to be opened by Bush. The U.S. president is to meet with Olmert and Abbas and address a dinner of all participants in Washington the day before.

Back in Washington on Wednesday, Bush plans to see Olmert and Abbas again privately for a third time in as many days, ostensibly to seal their intent to create a Palestinian state by the end of his second term.

The intense White House involvement in a meeting that was planned to be run almost entirely by Rice when first broached in July took some by surprise and was seen as a sign Bush is making a serious bid for a Middle East foreign policy success. He leaves office in January 2009.

"This conference will be a launching point for negotiations leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state and the realization of Israeli-Palestinian peace," said White House National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe.

Aside from Olmert and Abbas, who received their invitations ahead of the 47 other countries, organizations and individuals on the U.S. made few immediate public commitments to participate at the foreign minister level that the United States wants.

The invitation list includes select members of the Arab League, the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the Middle East envoy for the Quartet of peacemakers former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Group of Eight industrialized nations and the European Union.

Among Muslim countries, there has been great suspicion of the conference with many nations questioning the Bush administration's ability to forge peace, particularly between two leaders, Olmert and Abbas, weakened by internal political turmoil.

U.S. officials, led by Bush and Rice - the secretary has made eight trips to the region this year - insist that the talks will be serious and substantive, not merely a photo opportunity, and also will address the issue of a broader Arab-Israeli peace.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice looking on as U.S. President George Bush meets with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas in New York earlier this year. (AP)

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 27. 0 0
    What peace conference?
    • The Arab Hammer
    • 22.11.07
    • 09:30

    I think Rice and her boss know full well that nothing will come out of this charade. Everyone knows that the majority of Israelis and their political establishment is awash with extremists and fanatics who have no wish other than to grab as much land and get rid of as many Palestinians as possible. Let us not kid our selves about peace and reaching a lasting settlement. Zionism is an anathema to peace. Zionists believe in colonizing the land and claiming it exclusively for Jews. This is not the hallucination of some fringe group with no real power but this is what mainstream Zionism is all about. Israel is a fanatical entity led by brain washed religious demagogues who have been able to manipulate Jewish suffering in Europe in the last century to promote their own extreme agenda. The world had better wake up and smell the coffee.

  • 26. 0 0
    No deal will be forthcoming without the Palestinian
    • Daniela Yariv
    • 22.11.07
    • 09:07

    leadership recognizing, before all else, the state of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, none. So far they even attempt to negate the existence of the Jewish people as a people and of course, its right to national self-determination and statehood. If this continues to be this leadership's attitude - negating their opponent - they can forget about peace or about a state for their people.

  • 25. 0 0
    Daniel, 21, the final nature of the present effort IS the issue!
    • Ivar
    • 22.11.07
    • 08:45

    There may never be another opportunity to solve the Palestinian crisis, and even if the forever sick patients rally their fading strength yet one more time, it can not possibly match that which is available today. The trend has been downhill for decades, but more important, present circumstances have inspired the Arab League and the Palestinian leadership to acknowledge that extremism and Jihadism are on a popular rise among the world's Billion Muslims, which will insure the "Talibanization" of country after country unless the cause celebre for Islamic radicalization, the Palestinian crisis, is solved. Crisis breeds crisis, unless sanity intervenes with a strong hand. The Saudi Initiative was that strong move. If it is rebuffed, there will be no basis on which to build a peace in the future, which bears every prospect of leading to a Middle East spiraling out of control, and World War III.

  • 24. 0 0
    G-D WILLING AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED!
    • THE END IS NEAR
    • 22.11.07
    • 08:23

    FOR HER TREACHERY AGAINST THE ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT EVER LOVED HER!

  • 23. 0 0
    No different from one administration, except for one thing
    • Natallie Durson
    • 22.11.07
    • 08:21

    Bush is much more willing to get tough with the Israeli leadership. He has already forced this summit upon everybody, including rhe Israeli, who initially wanted no part of it. It would be interesting to know why Bush can move Israel into action where Clinton cound not, in the same circumstances. Of course, nothing will come of it. Israel will change tactics from necessity, but there will be no actual progress toward peace. In a way, this is a step forward. The next president that attempts to force Israel to come to a peace agreement will start where Bush left off. In other words, America must make Israels annual aid package dependent upon results rather than promises. This is what is already done with Egypt and Jordan and it works wonders.

  • 22. 0 0
    A Fake meeting
    • Atoo Landarv
    • 22.11.07
    • 07:49

    What is taken by force, can only be taken back by force even if the wait spans a thousand years. Peace with Zionists is a joke. Zionists can not sit and negotiate because if they do, very little will be left for them to keep.

  • 21. 0 0
    Desperately seeking Rice in need of a success story in the ME.
    • Daniel
    • 22.11.07
    • 07:11

    As the term was often phrased by a former president Clinton in negotiation of a real peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians, we were within a "window of opportunity". The opportunity was blown away by Arafat's intransigence and moreover, his intra-Palestinian "divide and conquer" power play which has resulted in a divided Palestinian society with the multiple power brokers we see today. In this backdrop, the white in shining armor, Secretary of State Rice, assumes that she can ride in on her white horse and arrange a peace deal within a year. This plan is flawed, dangerous, and if heaven forbid is actually materialized, will only result in grief for both Israel and the Palestinians. Peace goes far beyond a signed document. It has to be implemented. We need to await the next true window of opportunity, where the Palestinians will have a leadership with the ability to lead and to rule. Abbas is not this person.

  • 20. 0 0
    Rice - Experience your PHONY Peace-LIVE in Sderot
    • Linda Rivera
    • 22.11.07
    • 06:47

    For the sake of justice, Bush, Blair, Rice, Olmert, Peres, Livni - all Americans, Europeans and Israelis involved in stealing Jewish land for expansionist Islam, must live in Sderot. Why should they be deprived of the results of their peace agreements? US/EU/UN are eager to duplicate in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem the terrorist success of Gaza, LAND FOR WAR: the Jew-cleansed areas of Gaza have been transformed into global terrorist training grounds and rocket firing sites into Israeli communities. In Sderot, Israeli terrified peace process victims offered up as sacrifices - live in continual fear of constant daily rocket attacks. Their desperate pleas for help are cruelly ignored! The immoral peace process based on venomous Jew-hate and ruthless, forcible ethnic Jew-cleansing - REQUIRES Jews to ACCEPT being maimed and MURDERED! Stop the planned second Holocaust of Jews! Stop a Global Islamic TERROR State in Israel!

  • 19. 0 0
    Given the obstacles from opponents - U.S.,Israeli & Palestinian
    • Smadar
    • 22.11.07
    • 06:27

    leaderships seem to be progressing well towards reaching a goal of attaining a peace agreement by 2008. We've never had such an optimistic timeline in the hopes of settling the Middle Eastern dispute, let alone a comprehensive peaceful arrangement with the outstanding Arab countries as well. What can be more definitive than this accomplishment of negotiating the boundaries, that is two states side-by-side as intended by majority of peoples on both sides at this period and time? In reaching this goal compromises will materialize from both sides as diplomatic talks proceed and this is inevitable. There is genuine desire by the moderate leaderships to deal with the core issues, however, it's the challenges from opponents such as Yisrael Beitenyu, which characteristically prevent this, as well as the unacceptability of Hamas of the Quartet's 3 conditions. No small challenges.

  • 18. 0 0
    Folks..
    • Joseph
    • 22.11.07
    • 03:23

    Folks, it's a photo-op. Nothing more, nothing less. Nobody there wants peace. Bibi and Haniya will one day sign the real deal. Thats my prediction.

  • 17. 0 0
    #6 God bless you
    • sal
    • 22.11.07
    • 03:01

    #6, it's great to read something refresing. most of the e-mails from Israel are centered on: "let's keep it as it is, more wars, occupation, tensions, etc.." I wish more Israelis would see that working to promote peace is in the interest of eveybody, including the Israelis.

  • 16. 0 0
    #9-2 Peacelover
    • * BEN JABO
    • 22.11.07
    • 02:26

    Both she & Bush called for a "Free" Iraq--They call for a lot--Now they are concerned with pistachio imports to Israel--

  • 15. 0 0
    #9 Peacelover - Let us not forget
    • * BEN JABO
    • 22.11.07
    • 02:10

    Bush stood on the carrier flightdeck in his Pilots costume and proudly declared "Mission Accomplished"--Bush loves to talk, most of us stopped listening long ago---At this point in time he is a lame duck President, vainly trying to leave some sort of heritage--

  • 14. 0 0
    #7 Lincoln - Condi has a job lined up
    • * BEN JABO
    • 22.11.07
    • 02:07

    You may be assured that she will be employed by some Arab entity--Think of Jimmy Carter, who sold his soul for his Presidential library and it's upkeep--Saudi Arabia owns Carter lock, stock and barrel--And so it will be with Condi-- Bush already belongs to the oil interess, as does his father--

  • 13. 0 0
    The Girl from Phantasia
    • Tosefta
    • 22.11.07
    • 01:33

    Good luck to Rice, and I hope she enjoys herself in the coming year, because once the Bush term ends and there is no peace, there will be no way to Phantasize that it actually happened under Bush. (I am excluding the use of certain "smoke" agents.) The US did nothing to counter the pressure the Israeli Right Wing (Lieberman, Shas) put on Olmert to empty the Annapolis meeting from any content. The US put NO pressure on Israel to compromise, for whatever reason. Pressuring Israel during a US election year will be even harder, so we can expect no pressure. Rice and Olmert imagine that once Olmert returns from Annapolis, Lieberman will let him negotiate as he pleases. Why? Is Lieberman blind? Is he a fool? Of course he will come up with new demands (like being in the steering committee of the talks). In any case, Olmert himself is far from being close to the Palestinian demands, and Livni too. Weak as Abbas is, he is still a patriot and will not agree to anything that the Palestinian public rejects overwhelmingly. Lastly, there is a good chance that Olmert will be indicted, or otherwise be removed due to his conduct in the Lebanon war. Months of electioneering, even within Kadima for a successor, will be spent. And peace with an impotent Abbas will not be easy to sell in any case.

  • 12. 0 0
    Didn't she call for a Palestinian state by 2005?
    • peacelover
    • 22.11.07
    • 01:01

    a very expensive photo-op for Bush and Olmert, and nothing else.

  • 11. 0 0
    America is dumping Israel
    • Wendy
    • 22.11.07
    • 01:00

    What happens when the summit fails? America is dumping Israel.

  • 10. 0 0
    Bells are ringing
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 22.11.07
    • 00:26

    Bells are ringing Inside of her head. They are ding-a-linging Inside of her head. When Bibi replaces Olmert, there will be no chance of peace. Condi and her 'husband' Dubbya never considered much less ever actually pressured Israel to head towards peace. Bush gave Israel the carrot for free and never considered suggesting that the stick also might be used. In simple terms, aside from Condi's flatulent statements and frantic tourism, the US administration did everything in it's power to ensure Annapolis failed. Condi better line up a job with the American Incompetence Institute. She has proven to be not only an incompetent, but a fool who would go on a fool's errand.

  • 9. 0 0
    The old quisling rubbing shoulders with Dubiya,a dream come true!
    • lakshmi
    • 22.11.07
    • 00:07

    He had better make plans for resigning or seeking asylum in the U.S.,after his illegal activities against the Palestinian people,starting with signing away their rights at Oslo,and now his anti Palestinian activities in the West Bank,plus the illegal withholding of civil servant salaries in Gaza(against civil service law).Secretly collaborating with israel in the siege of Gaza . . . and so on.And if he actively engages with the enemy in any action against Gaza,that will be the end,not the beginning of the end.

  • 8. 0 0
  • 7. 0 0
    Peace with the Arabs
    • David Bergman
    • 22.11.07
    • 00:05

    Re making peace with the Arabs. When we look back into American History, the Indidans were able to hold on to their land for as long as they had the strength to hold on to it. We all know the rest of what happened. The same scenario also applies to the situation between Israel and the Arab Countries. All that talk about making peace are just wasted words. The Arabs want to destroy Israel and all of that peace talk is just to give them time to prepare for it. The past has shown us that zutumult very clearly. Israel will be able to hold on to the land for as long as it will have the strength to hold on to it. And that is what will determine the survival of Israel. People don't change because they see the light. They change when they feel the heat. And Israel is certainly feeling the heat.

  • 6. 0 0
    Unprecedented global meeting for unprecedented global problem
    • Ivar
    • 21.11.07
    • 23:51

    I rise to congratulate President Bush and Secretary Rice for this most hopeful, most serious effort to address the core issue which has provoked global terrorism and more wars than I care to count. Thanks to the Saudi Initiative, which opened the door to Annapolis and remains its most basic foundation, we may finally witness broad moves for peace for which the Middle East and the world has waited for over half a century, and the removal of the most serious threat of a World War III since the Cold War. Secretary Rice's mention of openness to discuss peripheral related issues such as the Golan is MOST welcome, and will certainly bring the most needed guests to Annapolis, members of the Arab League who will shape a regional peace with Israel on the foundation of the Palestinian peace. May God bless this hopeful meeting!

  • 5. 0 0
    Of course there is no guarantee of success
    • Johnny Weintraub
    • 21.11.07
    • 23:46

    When Yasser Arafat walked out of Camp David, Maryland, during 2000, he left a very generous offer that was made by former Prime Minister Ehud Barak on the table. I can not imagine that Arafat's chosen successor,Mohammed Abbas (a.k.a. Abu Mazen) would accept anything less, even though Abu Mazen dresses in a business suit.

  • 4. 0 0
    Terminology
    • Tosefta
    • 21.11.07
    • 23:42

    Question: How do you call a conference that conks out before it even starts? Answer: Conkerence.

  • 3. 0 0
    Prediction: Low level Arab attendance
    • Tosefta
    • 21.11.07
    • 23:40

    "Egypt confirmed its attendance to the Annapolis meeting in a statement Wednesday, saying Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit would attend" - Haaretz Egypt has a President and a Prime Minister, but only the FM will attend. And if Egypt does that, no other Arab country (except perhaps Jordan) will send a higher level representative to the photo-op meeting. The Saudi Foreign Minister is quite nice looking, so I imagine that if they send anybody it will be their Ambassador to the US, a rather bald and ungainly fellow. And he will stand there with no Keffiyah either. Syria`s Muallem is also not a beauty, and uglier than their ambassador in Washington,so I predict Muallem will be the one to go, if any.

  • 2. 0 0
    The Girl from Phantasia
    • Tosefta
    • 21.11.07
    • 23:33

    Good luck to Rice, and I hope she enjoys herself in the coming year, because once the Bush term ends and there is no peace, there will be no way to Phantasize that it actually happened under Bush. (I am excluding the use of certain "smoke" agents.) The US did nothing to counter the pressure the Israeli Right Wing (Lieberman, Shas) put on Olmert to empty the Annapolis meeting from any content. The US put NO pressure on Israel to compromise, for whatever reason. Pressuring Israel during a US election year will be even harder, so we can expect no pressure. Rice and Olmert imagine that once Olmert returns from Annapolis, Lieberman will let him negotiate as he pleases. Why? Is Lieberman blind? Is he a fool? Of course he will come up with new demands (like being in the steering committee of the talks). In any case, Olmert himself is far from being close to the Palestinian demands, and Livni too. Weak as Abbas is, he is still a patriot and will not agree to anything that the Palestinian public rejects overwhelmingly. Lastly, there is a good chance that Olmert will be indicted, or otherwise be removed due to his conduct in the Lebanon war. Months of electioneering, even within Kadima for a successor, will be spent. And peace with an impotent Abbas will not be easy to sell in any case.

  • 1. 0 0
    deja vu or tell us the old old story
    • victor hardman
    • 21.11.07
    • 22:39

    attempt no 502 on the way !! its like building a house using califlowers !