Revealed: The secret war over IDF officers' exorbitant salaries
News of battle comes after revelation of shady deal in which army arranged NIS 3m pension for MK Shai.
By Meirav Arlosoroff and TheMarker Tags: Israel news IDFThe Israel Defense Forces chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, has a monthly salary of NIS 68,060; a major general makes NIS 48,265 a month; and a brigadier general makes NIS 39,340 a month. The average monthly salary in Israel is close to NIS 8,000. While questions are occasionally raised as to the disparity between these sums, it appears that there are other potentially highly inflammatory data about military wages that the army is hiding.
This week, TheMarker revealed that MK Nahman Shai will receive the pension of a brigadier general for his whole life, after only having held the rank for less than three years (as head of the IDF Spokespersons' Unit), despite the fact that to receive such a salary, an officer needs to have served at the rank for more than three years. In order to enable the Kadima lawmaker to receive the lavish pension, valued at an estimated NIS 3 million, the Israel Defense Forces arranged for Shai to take an unpaid vacation for almost five years - which enabled him to buy a huge pension at the expense of the public purse, at a dirt cheap price.
Whoever questions how the IDF cooks up these shady deals regarding senior officers' leaving conditions, and how the deals are not exposed and criticized, will receive an answer immediately. The simple answer is that everything connected to the terms of military pensions remains unknown, beyond any kind of external supervision. A very senior defense establishment official described the matter as a "black box" that is at the center of a quarrel between the Finance Ministry and the IDF. This took place after the Defense Ministry's accountant, Tzahi Malah, was authorized for the first time ever to examine IDF salaries. Malah subsequently began an inspection, during which he became suspicious that there were irregularities. Apparently these were found in the way the army credits major generals' complementary cars as being taxed.
But Malah's inspection was brought to an abrupt halt at the very moment suspicions arose of irregularities in IDF salaries. "The Defense Ministry accountant began the check, which raised suspicions of alleged salary irregularities, but the check was not completed," a defense establishment recalled. "The check has been carried sluggishly since then, due to difficulties the army has made."
"Making difficulties" is apparently an understatement for how the army simply booted Malah out, banning him from continuing to inspect salaries. Since then, the Finance Ministry's accountant general has been holding negotiations with the IDF, in an attempt to allow for the inspection to continue; in the meantime, the talks have been fruitless.
The fact that the army's system for wage payments is beyond the supervision of the Defense Ministry's accountant sparks considerable dismay. In complete contrast to this, the accountant can check every other payment made in the Defense Ministry - payments that are made through the Enterprise Resource Planning system, to which the accountant has access.
The IDF's payment system, however, is not included in the ministry's ERP software, a situation for which the army has many reasons. "The IDF's wages system was built many years ago; the IDF has no motivation for joining the ERP system, and this upgrade is being currently examined within budgetary limits," the IDF relayed. These excuses do not cover the fact that the accountant in the Defense Ministry is blind as far as military salaries are concerned. He reports on a monthly basis on the data the army gives him, but he has no direct access to the system from which this comes.
Not only does Malah have no direct access, but when suspicions are raised as to problems in the system, the army "makes difficulties" until the end of the inspections. There is a culture of cooperation in the Defense Ministry with the in-house accountant (despite the mistakes made during the Paris Air Show). But this culture is completely non-existent in the IDF, it appears.
What will bring the IDF to disclose the data?
It is reasonable to assume that whoever makes difficulties and whoever refuses to cooperate with inspections apparently has something he wants to hide. However, it is impossible to know how much he has that he wishes to hide while the IDF's salary date is not disclosed.
But it appears that there is no one who can bring the IDF to disclose its data. The ministry in charge of supervising the army, the Defense Ministry, has shirked the responsibility and given up on the desire to clash with the IDF on the matter. The ministry leaves such battles to be fought by its accountant, who is a Finance Ministry official - and everyone is comfortable with the Treasury waging wars.
The Finance Ministry, however, has no power to force the IDF to disclose the data; this is wielded only by the political establishment. In Israel's leadership, as is widely known, the futures of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak depend on one another; therefore, it is doubtful whether a politician can be found who will force Barak to make such a disclosure.
The IDF says in response that it "operates with full transparency and cooperates with the Defense Ministry and income tax in everything connected to the issue of wages. Salary data is transferred automatically to the Defense Ministry and the Finance Ministry accountant at the Defense Ministry every month.
"In the IDF, inspections are carried out by income tax auditors, and all of their recommendations are fully implemented. An inspection by the Defense Ministry accountant has recently been held in the IDF, and in these days there is another check by income tax [auditors] has begun; both inspections have been carried out with full cooperation by the IDF."
|
MK Nahman Shai. |
| Photo by: (Maya Levinn) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
we are taxpayers they keep stealing like any other politician and a soldier gets paid 300nis a month!!!!what a shame PLUS WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THE FOR FOUR OR FIVE SURVELLIANCE POEPLE ASHKENASI HAVE!!
The problem is not the high salaries. The problem is the lack of transpacrency. If it is vital to have a top paid person , that is not the problem. The problem is the Army is doing underhanded and under the table deals. Who knows if they do give some generals millions in illegal arms trade deals . If there is no transpanrency and the Army can do whatever he wants and is not under any public supervision , who knows what can be next. that is why Barak can use the Army to advance his personal agenda. He feels that he is above the law and beyond public scrutiny. I understand that he used the Army many times on Shabbat to evacuate Homesh. I understand that the Army is not to be utilized Shabbat only for life threatning or vital security tasks. Why is so vital to evacuate settlers on Shabbat??? However , if he he is beyond public scrutiny , he is liable anything he wants if he feels he can get away with it.
Corruption comes in many forms
As with any banana republic, the military junta make sure they look after each other.
it is shmeful
That high ranking officers receive a very respectable salary is and should not be the issue. At issue is whether service rank is manipulated to gain inflated pensions. The issue is theft. We ask our conscripts to risk life and limb for little compensation. It is the duty of the military to not exploit the pension system at the expense of the nation.
I'm retired USAF and I know that a Major General with 20 years service makes better then $14,000 (51,800 NIS)a month and people are paying Israeli Major Generals 48,265 NIS a month, you're kidding me. We are paying them to protect every man, women and child in this country, i can't think of a more important job in this country. Ask how much the MK's get for doing nothing after 2 terms !!!
Those are the people that protect our lives, any financial compensation is little compared to what they give us
Israel needs the best men it can get as senior officers. The job is highly demanding - no limit on the number of hours worked. I can be dangerous as well. Israel became a materialistic society, and we can't expect top notch people to dedicate their life to the army just for patriotism, without some compensation. As for the amount - 48K/month NIS translates to $150K annually, with the Israeli 50% taxes. $150K is a nice salary in the U.S, but nothing world shaking. Certainly a major general shoould be able to get such a salary, and will not have to go to the private market.
One reason for the poor performance of American forces is grossly inadequate salaries, pensions and post retirement health benefits. Our forces simply can't attract the best and the brightest which is why enlistment standards are continuing to drop.
between them. This is scandalous.
At first glance that sounds like a lot but if you really look at it and then compare it to what generals in other countries make and what people in business make (at the same relative positions), it is really not that much. As a person who is sacrificing their business aspirations for the service of the state, I think this is a small price to pay.
and many are those that will never strive for peace.
Meirav Arlosorov, are you a communist? Many high-techies in the private market earn 20-40knis/mo. Equivalent VPs and CEOs make 10 times that amount and don't have near the same weight of responsibility. IDF personnel make many sacrifices businesspeople never have to. I would think that the people with the burden of all our safety, in light of real danger, should deserve more than a software programmer or salesman. How will the army attract top talent if we pay less for so much more? Who will protect us then? The real problem is the number of people earning such low salaries to make the average so low and not the normal/low pay for top officers.