• Published 00:00 15.03.07
  • Latest update 00:00 15.03.07

PMO: New PA stance 'flies in the face' of international demands

Hamas: New gov't backs 'resistance,' right of return; Israeli official: Platform 'step backward' for peace process.

By Haaretz Service and Agencies

The platform of the new Palestinian unity government, which according to Hamas advocates continued violence against occupation, is a step backward from the peace process and "flies in the face" of the international community's demands, the Prime Minister's Office said Thursday.

"Instead of recognizing Israel and renouncing terror the emerging Palestinian government has decided to spring backwards," said David Baker, spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office.

"This is not what we were hoping for and flies in the face of the international community's demands of the Palestinians. Once again, they haven't provided the goods," he added.

According to excerpts from the new government's platform, published Thursday on two Hamas Web sites, the new government will continue to support "resistance" until the occupation ends, as well as uphold call for the right of return for Palestinians refugees.

The new government will also "respect" previous agreements with Israel, as stated in the Mecca agreement that led to its formation.

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas on Thursday presented the final cabinet list to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, a day after the two agreed on the make-up of the new government, ending weeks of arguments over the candidate for the powerful interior ministry post.

"I have handed over to the president the candidates for the new coalition. He has accepted that," Haniyeh said. "We are optimistic the government will open a new era."

In the first Israeli response to the government's platform, a senior official called it a major step backward for peace prospects, and said Jerusalem would lobby the international community not to work with the new government.

The Quartet of Middle East peace brokers - the United States, European Union, United Nations and Russia - has called for the new PA government to abide by three demands: recognition of Israel, renunciation of violence and agreement to honor previous accords.

Haniyeh said Thursday, however, he has received signals that the Europeans are ready to work with his new government, but acknowledged that winning U.S. and Israeli support would be difficult.

"No doubt there is a different position by the American administration and the Israelis," he said. "We are going to do what we can to support national unity, and to remove the siege and to maintain relations with the international community."

The full cabinet line-up will be submitted Saturday for parliamentary approval.

According to Hamas, the new platform states that, "The government confirms that the resistance is a legitimate right for the Palestinian people."

It goes onto say that, "halting resistance depends on ending the occupation and achieving freedom and [the right of] return and independence."

Nonetheless the platform states, "The government abides by the protection of the higher national interests of the Palestinian people, and the protection of its rights ... on the basis of that, respects international resolutions and agreements signed by the PLO."

The new government, Hamas says, also recognizes that "the key to security and stability in the region is in the ending of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, recognition of the right to Palestinian self-determination."

To that end, the manifesto states, "the government will work with the international community to end the occupation, and to return the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people."

The platform also touches on one of the key sticking points in negotiations between the two sides - the issue of Palestinian refugees.

According to Hamas, the government "holds fast to the rights of Palestinian refugees, and the right of return of Palestinian refugees to their land and belongings."

But, said the Israeli official, "anyone who looks carefully at the document will see that there is a regression on a number of important issues."

He noted the platform's call for the return of Palestinian refugees to Israel and its affirmation of the Palestinian right of resistance against Israel.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because an official government statement has not been released, said the language is even tougher than the original Palestinian power-sharing deal reached in Mecca last month. "This is not a step forward. It's a step backward," he said.

Also Thursday, Army Radio reported that Minister for Strategic Affairs Avigdor Lieberman has called for an emergency government to be formed comprising all Zionist parties, in an effort to counter the establishment of the new Palestinian unity government.

Related article

  • EU mulls funneling funds to PA through pro-Western official

    Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah and Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas shaking hands at a Gaza City meeting in February. (AP)

    • Print Page
    • Send to a friend
    • Share
    • Text Size +|-
     
     
    TalkBacks

    Why Facebook Connect?

    Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

    Add a comment

    Add your reply

    • 379. 0 0
      #313 Brnd goes on with more nonsense
      • Johnboy
      • 19.03.07
      • 05:52

      "Israel is not required to provide Gaza or West Bank Arabs with anything they didn`t get before June 1967 -- no Israeli fuel, water, electricity, harbor access. Those are PRIVILEGES Israel is free to withdraw at any time." Rubbish. The Occupying Power is OBLIGED to supply these services to protected persons under its power. The 4th Geneva Convention says so. Even if it DIDN'T say so Israel can not withdraw these services without running foul of International Human Rights Law; you can not subject people to collective punishment, and you can not starve them or deprive them of the basic essentials of life. If Israel is supplying them with water and electricity then it CAN NOT simply turn off the taps. To do so leave Israel open to a charge of a "Crime against Humanity". Look, I understand that you think that it is simply prudent policy for Israel to deprive these people of the ability to live. But that's because you are simply a complete nutter, Brnd.

    • 378. 0 0
      #347 Maurice has trouble with the word "refugee"
      • Johnboy
      • 19.03.07
      • 05:43

      "The refugee status is indeed dependent on "why" and "how" they left. As most of the Arabs in 1948 left of their own will or convinced by Arab countries to leave, it IS NOT Israel`s responsibility to compansate them today. That is basic ethical logic." - said Maurice. Nooope. The legal definition is found in Article 1 of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Go look it up. It is all to do with their inability or unwillingness to risk returning to their land, and NOTHING to do with the manner of their leaving. Israel is stopping these people from returning - no-one else is - so Israel is responsible for them being refugees. It matters not a whit how or why they left; it is entirely down to who is stopping them from going back. Israel is, Maurice. Israel is culpable. Israel owes these people.

    • 377. 0 0
      #319 Otto Rand, It seems Israelis are doomed...
      • Dutch
      • 18.03.07
      • 07:36

      Otto Rand, It seems to me Israelis are doomed to becoming wondering Jews again. Their thinking is just so distorted and racist in its orientation. Dutch

    • 376. 0 0
      Right of Return or Compensation
      • Joseph
      • 18.03.07
      • 00:09

      We have to separate the creation of a Pal state and the 'right of return.' Hundreds of thosands of Jews from Muslim lands were forced out and lost their homes and businesses. The question of return or compensation has to be evenhanded and include Jews who also suffered. The media seem obsessed with Pal suffering, but Jews were also victims.

    • 375. 0 0
      Make what progress we can
      • Joseph
      • 18.03.07
      • 00:05

      Israel needs to continue to work with Abbas as far as possible to move towards a Pal state. They have Gaza and should have most of the West Bank. The real issue is going to be Jerusalem --and this will require real concessions on the Pals' part. Let's move forward while there is momentum and let the Arabs worry about Iran.

    • 374. 0 0
      #325 I agree, Yosemite
      • hala
      • 16.03.07
      • 21:17

      Dear Yosemite: It certainly should be feasible for every nation to choose its citizens on the basis of morals, education, goodness, etc. Those, actually, are the people who do not make all the noise and would live peacefully with everyone if it were not for the damn thugs and corrupt villains. But then to be able to choose only the good apples would be a utopia--"no place." Cheers.

    • 373. 0 0
      #309 to yossi re Johnboy
      • hala
      • 16.03.07
      • 21:13

      Dear Yossi: Please do not see hatred in those who wish to point out an outright prevarication. So many posters keep saying that there never was a Palestine, yet ever since my earliest years in the German refugee camps, where we lived after being rescued from the Nazis, I have always heard and read about Palestine, it was a given. Some of the Jewish people whom we knew spoke of relatives who had gone to Palestine, a godmother went to Palestine to work as a nurse, and sent us photos, which we can show you, with "Palestine, 1950," (even after 1948) written on the back. I used to read about Palestine in magazines of the time, in National Geographic, then, in the sixties, I believe, the word became verboten. No hatred, Yossi, just amazement at the denial of facts. That does not help in the discussion, which we should all carry on with civility and hope for peace. Amen.

    • 372. 0 0
      Getting at each other's necks.
      • Simon
      • 16.03.07
      • 11:42

      "...emergency government to be formed comprising all Zionist parties, in an effort to counter the establishment of the new Palestinian unity government." If God were to look for faults humans would have been exterminated soon after their creation because no sooner than Adam had said l do, his wife came with a tainted fruit. What is the agenda now- a battle of religions?? Calm down Isaac you are the clever one. Stop looking for faults but give your all as Jesus did on the cross to get all in return.

    • 371. 0 0
      So do the illegal settlements, illegal annexations and occupation
      • John
      • 16.03.07
      • 11:13

      Talk about flying in the face of international demands... Not to mention apartheid.

    • 370. 0 0
      Billyjack, Tad, re: Maria
      • FSS
      • 16.03.07
      • 11:10

      As born again christian, we certainly don't agree with what the crusaders, lead by the roman catholics done in force conversion. In case you don't know, christians and catholics are great different in the interpretation of the scripture, thus affecting many major doctrines. A born-again children of Go-d, will only use God's word, (like Maria and Bill) to sow the seed, and wait upon the Spirit to work in harden hearts. Salvation comes from G-d, not by baptism or conversion rites. We loves the Jews because the Father loves them, it pains our hearts to see many reject Him, but we do not come "with hidden agenda", jews are still our brothers, believes or not. will never give up praying for you.Just met a messianic jew, a pastor who can never contain his joy in having found his Messiah, and wept every time for his brethren still outside Christ. Hope in my lifetime, i can see my spiritual jewish brothers saved as a nation. amen.

    • 369. 0 0
      EU IS SO STUNT, EU IS IN MIX FEELING
      • indrajaya
      • 16.03.07
      • 10:01

      Wow,Israelis must be so surprised by this achievement. In the most stressfull situation, a brilyant peaceful unity government can be reached with dignity. Welldone, Godspeed, Godbless.

    • 368. 0 0
      #298 Dubious LAND claims, not history!!
      • ballistic
      • 16.03.07
      • 09:26

      Claims to land in the holy land are rather dubious because 1) it is based on alleged GENERAL land ownership MANY long years ago and if the claims are honored, the precedent would be for all world maps to be withdrawn, so why make 1 exception 2) Zionists keep saying Pals have no claim to any land there, yet they bristle when someone suggests they prove 'inheritance' rights while zionists claim OUR PEOPLE lived there so and so thousands of years ago, and it is not even clear they are the SAME family now making the claim. Hell, if that loose standard is acceptable, my people would own the Holy Land as we lived on every part of the planet. Those Jews claiming land should be subject to the same 'prove your claim' that zionists yell to the Pals. That's fair, don't you think, esp when you are importing Nazis from the USSR who clearly have no claim or love for the land. Regards. Ballistic.

    • 367. 0 0
      For Ibrahim Shvonce # 350
      • Clickfool
      • 16.03.07
      • 09:10

      "Upon arrival to the capital of Hamastan, East Jerusalem, Clickfool inspected new Hamas training camps and Hesbollah rocket lunchers" Do you not think, for a moment, Ibrahim, that the Palestinian people are not as heartily sick of war and death and misery as the Israeli people? Israel is not at the smallest risk if it tries peace for a change. It would continue to have the largest military machine in the Middle East and if the new Palestinian State did not prove the peaceful, good neighbout I believe it will, its tanks could roll right back in and regain control. The only thing that Israel would lose by trying peace would be its territorial ambitions. Peace would mark the end of its growth by land theft. It is this that stops it talking to the Palestinians, not any future threat from the Palestinians.

    • 366. 0 0
      And what is the true picture,ravi of punjab?
      • Hastaroth
      • 16.03.07
      • 09:04

      "its just american arm twisting which has the e.u. and the quartet not coming out openly with a different view".. The EU is not ONE country,it's more than twenty,each one has its own policies and sometimes they disagree on various issues,some of which have to deal with the relationship between USA and EU.How,then,do you pretend that the US are forcing the EU to accept their positions on the Midle-East?

    • 365. 0 0
      #264 doris cadigan REISSUES CRAP NO 82 WITH THE USUAL
      • paul harris
      • 16.03.07
      • 09:03

      DORIS PLEASE EXPLAIN ??? WHAT IS THE "INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY " DOES IT INCLUDE THOSE MUSLIM HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS ?? THE CHINESE ONES THE RUSSIAN ONES ???

    • 364. 0 0
      Otto Rand # 354 re: 327
      • ChanahS
      • 16.03.07
      • 08:42

      Avi's post had nothing to do with revenge (as you may have noticed Jews do not spend to much time on this issue - see WW2) - but everything to do with the hipocracy of all those preachers like you trying to tell us how to bow down once again without really understanding the issues from our point of view.

    • 363. 0 0
      #352
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 07:35

      I'll bet you've never had anyone shooting at you, have you?

    • 362. 0 0
      OTTO RAND.A point of history the Moslems were making life hard
      • PETER SM
      • 16.03.07
      • 07:30

      for Christian pilgrims going to the Holy Land and worse. That however did not stop the Crusaders from massacring Jews all the way from Europe to the Holy Land. Interstingly we do not call for a Jihad against them or their descendents.Nobody calls for a Jihad against the Germans either.

    • 361. 0 0
      TRONNOSFINEST.Do you know the difference beteween"respect"& honor
      • PETER SM
      • 16.03.07
      • 07:21

      Respect is NOT a commitment it is a loose acknowledgement .Check it out I would be delighted for you to prove me wrong. Under the circumstances resistance does not commit to non violence nor does he say that, he only RESPECTS the concept. As they only respect Israel they do not acknowlege that it cannot be replaced by an Islamic republic from the river to the sea. I would love to hear the outrage from you people if Israel says that they only respect all deals with Hamas. How about a little intellectual honesty from the "intellectuals"

    • 360. 0 0
      Why is Haniyeh so fat while his Pal. brothers are"starving"?
      • PETER SM
      • 16.03.07
      • 07:08

      That suit could probably feed several Pal families for months.Who is paying? Still they are not all like that Suha Arafat lives the life of a refugee-in Paris.

    • 359. 0 0
      #353, WRONG!!!
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 07:02

    • 358. 0 0
      bill jack....we don't force people to accept....
      • maria
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:55

      Jesus as their savior,you know what why---easy believism won't get them to Heaven.we want true believers not pretenders.I see someone already planted seed(Word of God) in your heart, how did you know about getting saved,christian missionaries---the sad thing is, it didn't fall on the good ground of your heart.it fell by the way side...........but it's not too late yet.remember:God loves the sinners like us,but hates our sin. please haaretz post this....thank you.

    • 357. 0 0
      #344 Danite, Tosefta must have healthy dose of self-esteem
      • Smadar
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:52

      otherwise he wouldn't have the positive, pragmatic perspectives in accomodating to our adversaries towards a peaceful resolution for the region. Now, some of the phrasing or tone towards poor Cipora, I can do without, but who's perfect? There's always room to improve oneself, and I say that for myself as well. Nice chatting with you all and now I'll be off to bed. May peace be upon us soon, for the sake of our mishpacha!

    • 356. 0 0
      billy jack and tad are still in the dark.
      • maria
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:41

      I hope someday you'll find the LIGHT.billy jack , why did He killed them? because of stubborness of the pharoah of egypt,am I right?how many plagues did God send before he(pharoah finally let the hebrews go?.God is the Righteous God and HE's the God of Judgment also.The jews aren't perfect, but they're still HIS CHOSEN AND SPECIAL PEOPLE.

    • 355. 0 0
      To Avi#327
      • Otto Rand
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:33

      Historically, you are right, but we can't go by history alone. There were Crusades. The Christians wronged the Muslims by massacring them in hundreds of thousands. Are the Muslims justified in revenging the crusades today? They think so. The reality is that we must move forward. Jews were massacred by Germany of yesterday, but it is helped by Germany of today. Christians and Jews and Muslims are all inhabitants of one planet which is in danger of extinction. As important as history is our common interest in a peaceful future must unite us. Our separate national and religious identities are only of secondary importance while our planet is dying.

    • 354. 0 0
      Conditions for Admission (Dense Bird from Outerspace #338)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:24

      "I had already told you that Israel`s admission to the UN was unconditional. I had directed you to the ICJ`s Advisory Opinion on the matter of admission of 28 May 1948." - Dense Bird from Outerspace As I told you A FEW TIMES already, in the admission resolution, the statement of Israel agreeing to implement 194 precedes the statement that Israel is "a peace loving nation". This is a condition mentioned in the Charter, and the ICJ did not deal with such conditions. Let me repeat it in other words; perhaps it will penetrate your dense mind: If Israel's promise to uphold 194 (to the extent that it promised, not in full) was used by the UN in allowing the GA to conclude that Israel was peace-loving and therefore admissible, then Israel renouncing its promise may be regarded as invalidating the conclusion that it was peace loving. I don't know if I reached you. It is a unique experience for me to deal with such form of denseness. There are many limited intellects participating here. You are a special specimen of someone with some legal education but the inability to grasp obvious distinctions.

    • 353. 0 0
      Hamas adopted Fatah positions in practice (Otto Rand #315)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 06:00

      Hello Otto, Thank you very much for your support, and especially today which ended up being an especially hard one. There must have been an invasion of the brain snatchers somewhere. Unbelievable attacks by the mindless apologists for Israel. Considering your post #315, Hamas' positions are no different from Fatah's, in practice. Fatah has its own militia, Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, and they engage in "resistance" as well. The important thing is that Hamas agrees to a cease fire during Israel's negotiations with Abbas. They reserve their right to "resist", but in fact will suspend their resistance for the duration of talks. If there are no peace talks, neither Hamas nor Fatah will hold their fire for ever, and nobody in his right mind would expect them to.

    • 352. 0 0
      Tosefta reveals himself
      • Danite
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:59

      He assumes that anybody who had a childhood not as cold and limited as his own doesnt really deserve good self esteem nor any accolade for achievement.This is because his self esteem is so damaged he views what is normal in a distorted way.he has many many issues.Good luck with stuff.

    • 351. 0 0
      "From the shiny city on the hill": Clickfool's Dreams
      • Ibrahim Shvonce
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:57

      "Upon arrival to the capital of Hamastan, East Jerusalem, Clickfool inspected new Hamas training camps and Hesbollah rocket lunchers"

    • 350. 0 0
      international demands.....?
      • ravi
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:55

      is it international demands... or u.s. and israeli demands? its just american arm twisting which has the e.u. and the quartet not coming out openly with a different view on the palestinian unity govt. the true picture will soon emerge... and the us and israel will stand isolated... yet again

    • 349. 0 0
      Tosefta
      • Ben Gurion
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:51

      "If the ICJ answers in the affirmative, the GA will revoke Israel`s membership." The GA cannot expel a member on its own. The Security Council must also vote on expulsion. (may be Article 6?) NOTE: Tawain was not expelled, per se. The issue was presented as identifying which delegation representated China.

    • 348. 0 0
      #329, stop prevaricating
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:49

      I had already told you that Israel's admission to the UN was unconditional. I had directed you to the ICJ's Advisory Opinion on the matter of admission of 28 May 1948. I suggest you read it, and learn it by heart. It is only a page long.

    • 347. 0 0
      #284 - Johnboy and his incorrect arguments
      • Maurice
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:47

      Your response shows that you have no knowledge of what is going on in the world and that you have a non-ethical logic. Here is why: 1) You state: " At least be honest, and say that the USA and all the countries that it has in its pocket are against this. " For your information Canada has a distinct world policy than the US. If Canada were in US's pockets as you state, it would have participated in the coalition force against Irak. But it did NOT. Canada DID NOT approve and stayed out. 2)You state: "Their refugee status is not in the least bit determined by *how* and *why* they left, but by their inability to return, and the reasons why they can`t return." The refugee status is indeed dependent on "why" and "how" they left. As most of the Arabs in 1948 left of their own will or convinced by Arab countries to leave, it IS NOT Israel's responsibility to compansate them today. That is basic ethical logic.

    • 346. 0 0
      All this new PA stance confirms is the following:Hamas posturing
      • Smadar
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:38

      abilities are much more superior to the capabilities of President Abbas - this was a prediction even before Hamas was permitted to participate in elections. President Abbas has over the years become a pragmatic, more sophisticated politician both Israel and the U.S. can deal with, unlike the dramatic, irrational lingo or irremediable facade of Hamas, the inexperienced political faction to the political, yet international, arena. What a pity, such a waste of time and loss of dignity for the Palestinian people.

    • 345. 0 0
      #87 - Paulo
      • Eric
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:28

      " I'd much rather maintain the very standards of humanity that are designated by the UN and be called and `idealist` then become some critically-deficient North American. " What does being North American have anything to do with the topic in discussion??? So, is everyone in Portugal a good critic of world affairs? Do not forget Paulo that among the western European countries Portugal is the lowest one as far as standard of life is concerned, and much below Canada's. And as you should know there are hundreds of thousands of Portugese immigrants in Canada: I guess that proves well the point. So, please stop taking airs of superiority as you are sounding more ridiculous than anything else...

    • 344. 0 0
      Tosefta # 322 Reality
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:24

      Howdy Tosefta; The reality is that the Palestinian refugees will not be returned to Israel, the Jewish refugees will not be returned to the Arab countries from which they came, the Hindu refugees will not be returned to Pakistan and Bangladesh, the Muslim refugees will not be returned to India, the Korean refugees will not be returned to North Korea, the Vietnamese refugees will not be returned to Vietnam, etc. When the UN was founded, it was idealistic enough (due to the tens of millions of refugees and displaced persons caused by WW II) to hope that all refugees would be able to return to their places of origin after hostilities cease. Today, it is no longer considered to be a practical idea. Compensation for property losses is really the only viable option, but it will have to be done on a 1-1 reciprocal basis, i.e., one Palestinian refugee gets compensated by Israel followed by one Jewish refugee being compensated by which ever Arab country he got kicked out of, and so on.

    • 343. 0 0
      Hamas adopted Fatah positions in practice (Otto Rand #315)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:22

      Hello Otto, In practice, Hamas' positions are no different from Fatah's. Fatah has its own militia, Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, and they engage in "resistance" as well. The important thing is that Hamas agrees to a cease fire during Israel's negotiations with Abbas. They reserve their right to "resist", but in fact will suspend their resistance for the duration of talks. If there are no peace talks, neither Hamas nor Fatah will hold their fire for ever, and nobody in his right mind would expect them to.

    • 342. 0 0
      #316, Otto Rand 2
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:20

      There is a difference between being to the left and being an anti-Zionist who is supportive of Hizbollah and Hamas. Terror is never acceptable. The rabid anti-Semitism of these groups, and indeed, of much of the Muslim world is totally unacceptable. The 1949 Arab League Resolution which forbade member states to accord citizenship to Palestinian refugees , which Jordan, to its credit has disregarded, is totally unacceptable. All that said, my purpose, as I said, is a peaceful resolution to the conflict. I have been in favour of keeping the cease fire with Gaza in the face of provocations. Obviously, Israel will have to make concessions, but those concessions can only be made if the other side is willing and able to enter into honest peace negotiations. Jihad cannot be the way. Regards, Cipora

    • 341. 0 0
      Tosefta
      • Ben Gurion
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:11

      "Our fake Ben Gurion thinks that if he cites the part where Israel claims there should be no conditions on its acceptance to the UN, this somehow will be relevant to its commitment to solve the refugee problem" Tosefta That's is not what I said. Of course you didn't understand. That's OK. Think in terms of "obligated themselves"; to use your phrase, and conditionality. If you think about it you may eventually come to an understanding, but please don't put words in my mouth.

    • 340. 0 0
      #316, Otto Rand 1
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:03

      Dear Otto, Peace is usually much preferable to war. Peace is in the interests of the entire region. Personally, I am not as optimistic about the new unity government as you are. I honestly hope that I am wrong. I have tried on many occasions to convince a person I know for certain is from Hamas to enter into negotiations. I have also addressed posts to governments asking them to keep the peace process open as a possibility. But, I do not want to waste my time on someone for whom I have zero respect, and who spends his time undermining Israel. Spending endless posts on Israel's admission to the UN, which cannot be debated legally, is a waste of my time and energy. My only purpose is to try to advance negotiations, if that is at all possible for an individual. I try not to put too many cards on the table regarding my own personal political views. Let's just say, that I am somewhere in the center, and you know that, just as I know that you are to the left of me.

    • 339. 0 0
      Thw Law of Mars? (Bird from Outerspace #319)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 05:00

      "there is no such thing, even in la la land, as receiving UN membership through fraud." - Bird from Outerspace Are you a Legislator, dear Bird? If so, you make Martian laws, not Earthly laws. The UN never expelled any country, so the situation is unprecedented and there is no case law to guide us Earthlings. But as I suggested the other day, such a case might arise for Israel in the following scenario: 1. Assume Israel declares that it is going to ignore UNGA Resolution 194 and will not get involved at all in the resolution of the refugee problem. 2. The General Assembly refers the following issue to the ICJ for an Advisory Opinion: Israel's assumption of some responsibility for refugee relief in 1949 was stated in the resolution admitting it to the UN. It is therefore clear that the GA decision on admission was affected by it. Can the GA decision be revoked in view of Israel's recent declaration? 3. If the ICJ answers in the affirmative, the GA will revoke Israel's membership. Denial of this possibility is not doing any one of us any favor, except yourself. Sleep well, and don't interfere with our thinking. If you want to help, I suggest you go in warp speed to the future (since it is faster than the speed of light). See what the ICJ decides, then tell us. Or did you do it already??

    • 338. 0 0
      #313
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:57

      Wow, I never realized how many Australians hate Israel before. Hey, Maureen, say hi to some Aboriginals and Tazmanians for me, ok?

    • 337. 0 0
      Otto Rand
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:54

      "It`s an old dictum that people read in statements whatever they want to read"--And then you prove the point by saying that Hamas has "explicitly" stated it will abide by agreements made with Israel, "although not mentioning Israel". I think my dictionary must have gotten it's definition of "explicitly" wrong. Have you read Hamas' charter? It explicitly (meaning, it comes right out and says so in so many words) says they want to get rid of every single square inch of Israel and replace it with an Islamic waqf. It's on line, you can read it for yourself. It seems to me that you are reading what you want to here. Are you the pot calling the kettle black? By the way, Mr. I Hate Foreign Occupiers, what's a guy named "Otto Rand" doing in the land of the Maya and Mexica?

    • 336. 0 0
      Tosefta
      • Ben Gurion
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:52

      Oh I forgot to mention - Your post #325 is funny. I see I've really gotten under your skin. You seem very upset. When you get upset you always focus on the trivial. No susbtance at all, just ranting and raving. But as I said in my earlier post; I actually think you're improving in your ability to go beyond generalities. Continue to work on getting more and more precise. And please consult some lawyers - don't take my word for it. Do some work - don't assume you know everything.

    • 335. 0 0
      # 311 John
      • Lynn
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:51

      They need to leave the West Bank. I have never said one word about any of the Jewish immigrants living in the West Bank. If their is a two state solution, everyone needs to go to their respective state and respect the others country. Just that damned simple. And please stop trying to put words in my mouth. It is actually a very stupid unsound idea to dump 4 or 5 million people on either country. Most economically ignorant suggestion there is to date.

    • 334. 0 0
      Thanks, Otto Rand #318
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:45

      Thank you very much, Otto. I need any support I can get today. People can't see the obvious. What is the world coming to? (May be it is coming to Mars.)

    • 333. 0 0
      Tosefta
      • Ben Gurion
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:45

      I love how you call me fake Ben Gurion. Who is the real Ben Gurion - you? I thought you were getting smarter but your last post proves you are regressing again. But what can we expect from a man who thinks the USA has a Prime Minister, who thinks there are things called "Wrong Facts";(1) who thinks that the Lebanese/Israeli border is in dispute. (1)I suspect that English is not your native language so your are forgiven for your misinterpretations of words and their meanings. "Some people have a limited intelligence but strangely also have great self-confidence in themselves" - That describes you perfectly.

    • 332. 0 0
      aren't you glad....arabs....for God gave you...
      • maria
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:43

      chunk of lands flowing with oil, but still not happy and don't even want to share your land with your brethren , the palestinians(jordanians who became palestinians overnight).your goal is to destroy the tiny land of israel and its people.which one do you prefer-----land flowing with milk and honey or land flowing with oil.

    • 331. 0 0
      Hubba Hubba
      • Marvin
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:12

      Death to whatever country you're from Baz (if that IS your real name)! It's end will be as violent as it's beginning (or more, depending on what country it is). Really, to be fair, I propose that every country on earth die in blood and fire. After all, which one is innocent?

    • 330. 0 0
      How to learn from reality (Jeff Northridge #305, re Labhras)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 04:09

      Jeff, as you know yourself, you have little experience with real situation. This means that you tend to make many many mistakes in your evaluations and suggestions. Let me repeat one piece of advice I gave you before. Perrhaps the repetition will help. "Perhaps Israel agreed to abide by UNGARs 181 and 194 at the time, but they no longer apply today" - Jeff. Earlier today you made the even stronger statement that 194 was actually replace by a statement on refugees in UNSCR 242. Before you make any such statements, which you haven't seen written anywhere but which just arose in your mind, you should check what Israel is saying. After all, Israel is the interested party, it has an army of lawyers, and would dig for any way to rid itself of any obligation regarding the refugees. You will see that Israel never claimed that 242 overrode 194, and that it does not claim that 194 is just "too old". Also, from your own experience you will know that once you undertake an obligation to pay some somebody for a property of his under your control, this obligation just doesn?t get too old. You have to pay. Reality can help you. It will not change your innate abilities, but it can weed out some of the many false arguments you make. It will look much better.

    • 329. 0 0
      On thinking and nonthinkers ( Fake Ben Gurion #299)
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:44

      "The shame of it is that Cipora already cited a relevant passage. find it between post 331 and 333" - Tosefta "And what was one of the passages Cipora cited (actually paraphrased) in #331. Why the same one I cited." - Fake Ben Gurion The issue of the long discussion between Cipora and myself was the relation of the refugee problem to Israel being admitted to the UN. It was actually post #332 that was meant ("between" the posts I mentioned). Didn't want to make it too easy for a nonthinker.) And here is the passage relevant to the refugee problem that Cipora cited of Israel's statement: "3, The solution to the refugee problem can be effected only within a negotiated peace process, and in cooperation of the countries of the Middle East". Our fake Ben Gurion thinks that if he cites the part where Israel claims there should be no conditions on its acceptance to the UN, this somehow will be relevant to its commitment to solve the refugee problem, which the UN took into account when approving Israel?s membership (as stated by them explicitly). No dense one, it isn't the relevant passage. I told The Fake earlier that he shouldn't deal with legal matters which he has not the mind for. His mind is so imprecise that he can't comprehend the simplest legal issue. The man can't tell what is relevant and what isn't. How many times does this need to be repeated with an example in front of his eyes. Some people have a limited intelligence but strangely also have great self-confidence in themselves. Dumbya Bush is an example, and Dumbite is too. I imagine it has to do with parental attitudes and nothing to do with the actual ability of the person. It is not bad to have self-confidence, except when the mismatch with reality is too great, as it is here. "Man has got to know his limitations" - Clint Eastwood

    • 328. 0 0
      Hey there Maureen; well, you know
      • ballistic
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:39

      Lieberman is an odd bumpkin because he normally voted for social issues and whatever, however, his insistence that more US soldiers die in Iraq is crazy, this in spite of Petraeus saying we can't win. He is right up against Bush in this fiasco in Iraq cause Israel, according to him, is in danger and he has threatened to jump ship to Repubs. He should be in the Knesset and hopefully he will be unseated next time around as CT is democratic all the way, but felt he had been Senator for a long time and were reluctant to unseat him. However, if he jumps ship, he is done next time around, maybe before if they recall him. Regards.

    • 327. 0 0
      You want fair?
      • Avi
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:38

      We Jews had our homeland taken from us by the Romans who are now dead and gone. But since then we've been kicked around like stray dogs by all you Christians and Muslims for nearly 2000 years. How dare you claim the moral high ground after what you've done to us! You Christians were burning us centuries before the Nazis' ovens. You Muslims were murdering us while Muhammad was still alive. Between the two of you you've taken over most of the world. Were the American continents originally Christian? Was Africa and all of southern Asia outside India originally Muslim? You are all guilty of conquest and dispossession. And you are all guilty of the most horrible crimes against us Jews! Now go back to oppressing your own minorities and leave us the hell alone!

    • 326. 0 0
      #282 Billy Jack re Maria
      • tad
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:32

      She is harmless man. She has been preaching to the Jews their demise for quite a while. She thinks the Bible is THE ONE AND ONLY HISTORY. Even when the Jews are killing off the Palestinians, she votes it is okay because the Bible says Jews own Israel. These religious zealots on all sides are a problem. Then, Jesus will come back and kill all the Jews that don't accept him.

    • 325. 0 0
      Hala I Have Written This A Couple Of Times
      • Yosemite
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:26

      I have said more or less that Israel should have the right to pick and choose the Palestinian Arabs it wants. There are a lot of terrorists and criminals that are Arabs although this does not actually constitute what all Palestinian Arabs may consist of. There are Veterinarians, Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Doctors, Engineers, Bankers, Lawyers, Teachers, and Engineers that are Palestinians and may have no ties to extremist or terrorist organizations whatsoever. Israel should use it's head. Which is more qualified for citizenship? An Angelic Arab Hala or a boiterous, swearing, drug dealing, gun toting Jew from the Bronx?

    • 324. 0 0
      yellowbirdwoman
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:21

      Did you know that Palestine was conquered from the Christian Byzantine Empire by the expansionist Muslim Empire out of Arabia in the 7th century? Your solidarity as a Native-American with other dispossessed people is admirable, but a bit misplaced. There are no truly indigenous people in the Middle East. Everyone has been conquered there, and all current regimes are conquerors, including the Muslim ones.

    • 323. 0 0
      ChanahS # 289 What I Don't Get
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:16

      Howdy Chanah; What I don't get is how can UNRWA continue to grant refugee status to the descendants of the original group of refugees for generation after generation? I can see it for underage children, but after they reach the age of 18, they should be taken off the UN dole and become the responsibilty of the states in which they reside.

    • 322. 0 0
      to Johnboy #286
      • Ilya
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:11

      You sound so sincere in your preaching that one might even forget that your country in its entirety built on stolen lend. The only reason that nobody claims it back is that your ancestors were masters of genocide and there is almost nobody left to place the claim. Your posts remind me of child molesting catholic priests talking about not harming innocents, human rights etc to their parishioners just before they are caught.

    • 321. 0 0
      Yellowbirdwoman # 254 The Strong & Proud
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:00

      Howdy Yellowbirdwoman; The Palestinians can be as strong and proud as they want just as long as they do it on their side of the fence. They can also breed themselves into perpetual and abject poverty and live off the UN dole into eternity, but once again, as long as they stay on their side of the fence.

    • 320. 0 0
      #113, "receiving its UN membership through fraud"
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 03:00

      Listen carefully: there is no such thing, even in la la land, as receiving UN membership through fraud. Getting admitted to the UN is not like getting a driver's license.

    • 319. 0 0
      To Tosefta #62
      • Otto Rand
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:59

      Unfortunately, yours is a voice calling in the desert. The moral decadence of so many Israelis leads them to to believe that a) they have the right to all of Palestine of the British mandate, and possibly more. The struggle against occupation is illegitimate. b) that the refugees have no rights whatsoever. If they rot it's the responsibility of the Arabs. c) Syria needs to give up its legitimate territory if it wishes peace with israel; and even then it would be a favor. d) all Palestinians are terrorists and therefore they should be exterminated, together with Hizbolla and Iran of course. Weak Israeli leadership does not use its nuclear power to get rid of them.

    • 318. 0 0
      #277
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:47

      Israel is a country of 6 million people (not all of whom are Jews, you know). It cannot accomodate over 4 million new people, even if it wanted to. Nor can it pay reparations to that many people, even if the 4 million descendants of the 800,000 Arab refugees deserve reparations. On the other hand, there were nearly a million Jewish refugees from Arab and Muslim countries as a result of the 1948 war. No Jew without a deathwish would want to move to Iran or Egypt these days, and I sort of doubt one could convince Arab/Muslim countries to pay for lost property and such. Hey! I know! How about if the Israelis and the Arabs/Muslims agree cancel out each others' respective debts and forget this whole reparations or resettlement thing? On a final note, Johnboy, are you willing to leave your property to allow the original Aboriginal who used to live there (or his descendent) to come home? If you are a white Australian, you have no right to criticize ANYONE over this issue.

    • 317. 0 0
      To Cipora julianna Kohn
      • Otto Rand
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:47

      Dear Cipora, Nice to see your posts again. Your rightful anger should be directed at those who are procrastinating the dismantlement of the illegitimate settlements. of course, it's crazy to call on the Arabs to shoot rockets; they don't need anybody's encouragement. I only hope that the settlements will be largely dismantled and soon, since they are a major obstacle to progress on peace negotiations. I am not sure whether you and I agree that without peace (not at any price) the future of Israel is bleak.

    • 316. 0 0
      Hamas has changed 180?
      • Otto Rand
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:40

      It's an old dictum that people read in statements whatever they want to read. I, for one, see the new PA stance as a positive development. Those who want to hear a Hamas love song for Israel can wait for the angels to sing. But there is stark realism in the PA statement with a face saving formula for Hamas. 1. Hamas declares continuation of resistance to occupation, but not armed resistance. This is a significant change. Does anyone think that the Palestinians have no right to resist occupation in any form and manner? 2. Hamas explicitly agrees to honor previous agreements including those with Israel, although not mentioning Israel. This is certainly an acceptance of one of Quartet's conditions. 3. Hamas is willing to extend the cease fire to the West Bank, including Qassams and suicide bombers. This is another condition of the Quartet. A permanent cease fire has to be an outcome of negotiations. 4. The refugee issue is a negotiating position. They have theirs; Israel has its own.

    • 315. 0 0
      Billy Jack
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:38

      Jews have not fared well at the hands of Christians, either. Christian missionaries and the like have been responsible for more Jewish suffering over the centuries than any other single group. That they've done the same to the indigenous peoples of the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceana (I'm assuming you belong to one of those groups) suggests to me a common cause. The support of right-wing Christian groups for Israel is based on their idea of Apocolypse, complete with the Rapture of the saved and the 1000 year suffering of the unbelievers, including Jews. The support of the Christian-right for Israel is a bit like the Ku Klux Klan making a donation to the NAACP. Still, as the most hated country on earth, Israel can't be too picky about their supporters.

    • 314. 0 0
      #291Tosefta. Well then, that lets the Israeli...
      • Maureen Ann
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:37

      imbecilic government off the hook...re carnage against Palestinian and Lebanese civilians. Perhaps they just act like imbeciles to escape blame!!!

    • 313. 0 0
      #260 Johnboy, more "war crime" fantasizing
      • Dr. L. Brnd
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:30

      Israel is not required to provide Gaza or West Bank Arabs with anything they didn't get before June 1967 -- no Israeli fuel, water, electricity, harbor access. Those are PRIVILEGES Israel is free to withdraw at any time. Likewise, PA residents can not claim any of the benefits of the Oslo Accords when their "government" had just repudiated its own obligations. Hardly a "war crime" or "collective punishment" to withdraw that to which they have no entitlement in the first place. What are you smoking there in OZ? Did the alcohol content of Foster's just increase? As for annexing the disputed areas needed to protect Israel from the Hamas terrorist regime -- do you see any Hague indictment of Israelis for annexing Jerusalem or the Golan Heights? As the Jewish people have found out many times when it failed to act to protect Jews, "The Hague" is worthless. It isn't now going to rescue a Hamastan that rejects the 3 Road Map requirements. How? On what grounds, that Jews defended themselves?

    • 312. 0 0
      Lynn refugees return?
      • John
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:28

      By your line of reasoning how do jews from Brooklyn return to the occupied west bank??

    • 311. 0 0
      #249, yishuv
      • Cipora JuliannaKohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:28

      He has no heart, so how can it be blind?

    • 310. 0 0
      to Paulo#200
      • Ilya
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:22

      Unlike you I never make anything up. I loved your signature at the end of the post.YOU forgot to put Yours truly though.

    • 309. 0 0
      johnboy is aghast that hala does not understand his hatred
      • yossi
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:21

      for the jews.hala dont worry the idiot is on your side.he hates us as much as you do.make it up with him.he is in a state of panic.

    • 308. 0 0
      #174 Lynn and Palestinians in Jordan
      • hala
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:16

      Dear Lynn: Many people immigrate and find new, happy lives. Everyone should be free to live anywhere. I find it interesting that all of the Palestinians whom I know here, including some who are from Israel, keep a residence in the homeland, their relatives keeping everything in order when they are away. And they do not shoot anybody when they go back home, just have a great time with their people.

    • 307. 0 0
      JWRight to return????
      • John
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:11

      Jews from Brooklyn,california,etc.with no connection to the west bank have zero right to displace Palestinians!!!

    • 306. 0 0
      #265 Johnboy from Australia
      • hala
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:09

      Dear Johnboy from Australia: As I mentioned in my post, I was looking at the photos in the 1955 book which does use the label Palestine on the two photos which I mentioned. Trying to do two things at the same time, I noticed only the THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PALESTINE and knee-jerked. It is so sad to try to have any discussion when persons keep repeating the same mantra. I did reread your post later, realized that you are being ironic and did say "Oops, mate!" Fair dinkum? Goodonya? Forgive me? And thank you for speaking up. It never ends, does it? Like hydra heads.

    • 305. 0 0
      Labhras # 206 No Fraud Involved
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:06

      Howdy Labhras; As Cipora Julianna Kohn pointed out, the only conditions for a country's admittance to the UN are contained in its Charter (Chapter 4?) and that these suffice. It would be a violation of the UN's Principle of Universality to impose additional conditions. Perhaps Israel agreed to abide by UNGARs 181 and 194 at the time, but they no longer apply today and the Arabs never did honor them. For example, UNGAR 181 envisioned Israel to be a lot smaller than she is today, but not even the Arabs are demanding that Israel go back to the 1947 Partition Plan. The paragraph in UNGAR 194 about refugees contains the condition to "live at peace with their neighbours" which has never been met by the Palestinians. Why do you bring up UNSCR 242? It came much later than Israel's admission to the UN and only calls for a "just settlement" to the refugee problem and no return is mentioned.

    • 304. 0 0
      Fed Up
      • John
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:06

      Israelis have committed war crimes against the Palestinians since the beginning of the occupation(from 1967until TODAY)and have been UNPUNISHED!!!!

    • 303. 0 0
      #7
      • Aaron
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:04

      I didn't know they had Fox News in Switzerland? The "islamofascists" phrase was coined by the fuckin retard in charge O'Reilly

    • 302. 0 0
      !81 Hey Gee; you ignore the law
      • ballistic
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:03

      in ignorance but indeed it does exist, yessiree, it does, try doing a tad of research before making such an outrageous statement. You just choose to think it does not exist. Zionists just won't be able to wheedle those Pals out of their land, nosiree, they won't. Regards.

    • 301. 0 0
      Nadav...which Israel?
      • John
      • 16.03.07
      • 02:00

      The vast majority of us have no clue which Israel the Palestinians must recognize.Until Israel declares its borders they would be insane to recognize the state.If they did Israel could then declare the state of Israel includes all of the west bank. My father's family lost a very large farm to Israel in 1948 but I have always maintained that is over and done,I don't agree with what was done and how it was done,but it's time to do the 2 state solution.Since it is now obvious Israel is going to continue to grab land with the wall encroaching over the green line and ever expanding"settlements"I have changed my view of the matter,I now wish exactly for the Israelis what they wished for and perpatrated on our family.

    • 300. 0 0
      #251, FOX
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:44

      Give him hell. You are much better at it than I am, and your posts get out. His latest is that Hez should launch rockets at the Jews in the West Bank to dislodge them. I won't say more for fear of being censored. He never seems to get censored, even when he advocates murder of Jews.

    • 299. 0 0
      Tosefta #231 correction
      • Ben Gurion
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:44

      Maybe you`re not as dense as I thought. Although the fact that you think that the Lebanese/Israel BORDER is in dispute, makes me wonder.

    • 298. 0 0
      ballistic#245
      • Danite
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:36

      Please explain how the claims of jewish history in Israel are "dubious".I cant wait to hear this one yesiree I can wait to hear this one.

    • 297. 0 0
      #237 hala, read my post again
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:29

      "Yet you say THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PALESTINE. " No, hala, my post *mocked* people who denied that there is a Palestinian people, and it *mocked* people who believe that there are no Palestinian refugees, and it *mocked* people who claim that all Palestinians are terrorists. People who hold such views should be treated with contempt. Unfortunately, their hides are incredibly thick - they appear to have no shame at all - and so I tried to *mock* them instead. Go back and read my post again with that in mind, and I think you'll see you owe me an apology.

    • 296. 0 0
      Leiberman is Israel's...
      • Maureen Ann
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:26

      biggest threat!

    • 295. 0 0
      # 174 Swiss
      • Lynn
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:25

      Jordanian Pals for the most part do not want to return. They have settled and have lives and businesses, built their homes. Their kids go to college. It was said that as the years have passed, they have lost interest in returning. It would seem, in Jordan, they have become part of that society. That is a good thing. They also aren't running around bombing people or shooting each other. Live in their own neighborhoods in peace.

    • 294. 0 0
      # 240 FOX Chewing gum in heaven...??
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:24

      Does Trident have a branch-office up there...??

    • 293. 0 0
      # 240 FOX Chewing gum in heaven...??
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:24

      Does Trident have a branch-office up there...??

    • 292. 0 0
      #90 Steve pats himself on the back with the JINGOIST feather
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:24

      Quite florid Jingoism, actually. You seem to think that the manner of their leaving the land is what determines their refugee status. It does not. What makes them refugees is their inability to return to the land that they lived on prior to the war 47-49. And the reason why they can not return is indisputable; the State of Israeli refuses to allow them to come back. That makes the State of Israel responsible for their refugee status, and it has been for the last 60 years. So if those people can not return then the State of Israel owes them proper, fair and just compensation for their loss, and if Israel is not willing to pay that compensation then it is OBLIGED to let them come back to their land. Your little dinky history lesson is completely immaterial; all that matters is who is responsible for these people NOT returning to their land following armistice. And it is ISRAEL who is responsible, so it is ISRAEL who owes them, and owes them Big Time.

    • 291. 0 0
      Rabid Fox on the loose
      • Tosefta
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:20

      Listen Fox, As I told you in the past, I see no point in dealing with nonthinkers, people who don't know about causes, effects, or what come first, or people who believe that Rabin was killed because of suicide bombers. Don't you get it? We operate on entirely different levels. Better go hunting for some chicken, and be happy. Good luck. "It is an ill thing to knock against a deaf, an imbecile, or a minor. He that harms them is culpable, but if they harm him they are not culpable." - Talmud

    • 290. 0 0
      KEEP MAKING OFFERS
      • AA
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:20

      What to offer: -Defining, through negotiations, a border based approximately on the Green Line. -On their side of border, leaving a Pal. state with functional continuity and fluidity and without IDF, settlements, checkpoints etc. -economic aid to the country and the descendants of the refugees -compromise and cooperation on Jerusalem What to demand: -on the Israel side of the border is the only Jewish majority state in the world -a "just and agreed solution" to the refugees but not one that translates into literal return, the Jewish refugees from Arab lands don't return either -Pal. state non-militarized except security forces who enforce law internally and prevent terror so IDF can stay out -formal agreement that the conflict is permanently over

    • 289. 0 0
      Johnboy # 239 - monumental ignorance?
      • ChanahS
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:16

      Fron Unwra's home page: http://www.un.org/unrwa/refugees/whois.html "Under UNRWA's operational definition, Palestine refugees are persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. UNRWA's services are available to all those living in its area of operations who meet this definition, who are registered with the Agency and who need assistance.

    • 288. 0 0
      #208 randy to paulo innate/inane
      • hala
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:15

      Dear Randy: Good on you for pointing out the malaprop of innate/inane. The wise man should bless the one who corrects him. I hope that you do not mind if I tell you that the expression is "splitting hairs" not "hares," why would anyone want to split the poor bunny rabbits? But nowadays the confusion is prevalent, for instance, people say "hair-brained" when it is "hare-brained," since hares get really whacky during March, the mating season (cf. mad as a March hare, as the March hare in "Alice in Wonderland"). Also, I see "hairlip" for "harelip" (it is supposed to resemble a rabbit's mouth area, and it was believed that if a pregnant woman saw a hare, her child would be born with a "hare lip"). I love words.

    • 287. 0 0
      # 92 Cipora
      • Lynn
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:13

      If it makes you feel any better, one of the Pals tunnels collapsed today. Killed at least one person in it. Not very good at tunnels either are they? We all knew this is another smoke screen.

    • 286. 0 0
      #76 Paul Harris and his strange use of the english language
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:12

      Honestly, when it comes to zionist propaganda I have not seen such debasement of the english language since the last time I read "1984". "WRONG KHALID ITS AMMAN !! THERE IS ROOM FOR ALL TO RETURN" - paul harris Double-plus good, Paul. Now, explain to me how these refugees are RETURNING to the land that they lived on and owned, when you are advocating them going Somewhere Else. Coz your rant reads to me like you are talking about their RELOCATION and RESETTLEMENT, not their RETURN. Fair enough - its an arguable demand - but at least be honest in describing what you are advocating. Coz when you describe THAT as their "right of return" then you are saying that Israel has no responsibility for their relocation and resettlement Somewhere Else, and THAT line of argument is going to be very, very hard for you to justify.

    • 285. 0 0
      What Happened?
      • Mary
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:09

      Looks like the Pals civil war didn't last as much as the Israelis wished for. This is not Lebanon were power struggle is to last 15 years. Pals have common enemy, the same as what is keeping the Jews together.

    • 284. 0 0
      #67 Maurice mentions the Usual Suspects
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:04

      "The US, Canada and Australia have clearly stated that they are against this" You forgot to mention Micronesia, and all those dinky little "island nations" who side with the USA against world opinion when it comes to a UN GA vote. At least be honest, Maurice, and say that "The USA and all the countries that it has in its pocket are against this". "Anyway, as historically documented most of the Arabs who left in 1948 were either scared and fled of their own will, or were told to do so by the Arab governments" - and this matters, how, exactly? Their refugee status is not in the least bit determined by *how* and *why* they left, but by their inability to return, and the reasons why they can't return. And the reason why is clear; not because they don't want to, but because Israel won't let them. THAT'S what makes them refugees, Maurice. THAT's why Israel owes them compensation, and if it isn't interested in paying compensation then it should let them back in.

    • 283. 0 0
      Holy land?christ,yes,no.
      • Bill Jack
      • 16.03.07
      • 01:03

      I have had countless family member locked up and beaten and forced to accept christ as their savior.I here jews say that they need the christians to be on their side for the war against moslems.It is just a cest pool of hate,hidden behind religion.Tell me all you jewish scholars what do you think of the christian missionaries.Do you think they should do to you as they have done to us,keep in mind this is the supposed reason we support israel,remember.

    • 282. 0 0
      RE Maria,killing egyptions?
      • Billy Jack
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:58

      If you believe that a god killed the first born male of every egyption,and not one egyption recorded this.Then you deserve to be be a religous fanatic,looking to kill those that do not follow your doctrine.You talk of palestinians teaching that christ was a palestinian,do you also speak of the jews who call christ a human teacher,not the messiah.Come on tell the jews they are wrong,come on maria.Tell them they will not see heavon if they do not believe in christ.

    • 281. 0 0
      El-Birawi
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:57

      What do you mean by "NO one is calling for the removal or the destruction of Israel"? Hamas is, for one. It's in their charter, for God's sake! And they're hardly the only ones.

    • 280. 0 0
      #119 Cipora does seem to miss the point
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:54

      "Immigration policy is one of the fundamental rights that attach to sovereignty." - they are not "immigrants", they are "indigenous" "Israel has never extended any sovereignty over them, nor does she wish to" - NOW we get to the core, Cipora. Under Int'l Law Israel is OBLIGED to extend sovereignty over these people, regardless of wether she says "Awwwww....I don't wanna". If a country seizes land and claims sovereignty over it then it is OBLIGED to extend its sovereingty to the indigenous people of that land. Israel can no more seize the land and eject the people than it can seize the land and kill all the people. BOTH ARE AGAINST THE LAW. If Israel doesn't like that then it has two options: 1) Bribe them to go away with massive compensation or 2) Retreat back to the Partition Lines of Res 181, which lets the refugees come back to a land that is in PALESTINE, not ISRAEL. But Israel can't just purse its lips and expect the problem to go away. It won't.

    • 279. 0 0
      Oh Doris/Dutch - You wordsmith
      • Gil
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:53

      How nauseating to see your post, but I know that you are used to hearing such things and probably smirk about it. You fly in the face of logic and truth as you present the same bull day after day. The Palestinian leaders are using their constituents as rottenly as Jordan, Egypt and the rest of the Arab world did for decades, and it is certainly not within anyone's right to purposely kill innocent civilians no matter how many times you post your spooge. If it were up to you Israel would not be a Jewish state, so how hypocritical you sound in making any statements about Israel as a Jewish state. Your next response will say that Israel must allow 5 million Arabs into her country as citizens thus eliminating the Jewish character of Israel. See, Dutch/Doris, you win no matter what - Israel can do no right and the Arab world no wrong. There is no fairness in what you post and no solution as long as idiots like you fan hatred instead of fostering peace.

    • 278. 0 0
      let the palestians lay awake in bed at night fantasising
      • zionist forever
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:49

      If the palestians are going to hold out on a deal untill they get a right of return then they will be waiting a very long time there will never be any right of return its all an arab fantasy .. but the problem is fantasy isnt reality its something that would happen in your own private dream world that doesnt happen in everybody elses world. The UN resolution that deal with the refugees are non binding general assembly one and the resolution itself talks about the original refugees not their millions of decendents. Do the palestians really want to rot away for another 60 years saying no deals untill refugee return is part of the package? Like George Bush said when he publicly backed the idea of a palestian state for the first time the palestian refugees would return to the palestian state not Israel. They cant have it both ways and get a state of their own as well as flooding Israel with arabs its time for the arabs to wake up accept the new reality NO RIGHT OF RETURN.

    • 277. 0 0
      peace
      • ahmad
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:42

      all of you men and women are need to know that peace is the answer to all of the problem we are talking about and i mean peace that are real and fair to all man kind .and to the people of palestine & and israel.

    • 276. 0 0
      #146 Brnd should also book some flights to the Hague
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:42

      Coz any Israeli leader who takes his advice will be asked to front up to some judges and "please explain". 1) War crime, plain and simple. Collective punishment of a people under occupation. Illegal under Int'l Humanitarian Law and Int'l Human Rights Law 2) Israel could get away with this 3) Ditto 4) Ditto 5) There is no war. Israel is very insistant about this. "An armed conflict short of war". 6) Illegal under Customary Int'l Law, the Kellog-Briand Pact, and the Geneva Conventions. "Next move up to Hamastan." Nope. Next move would be the UN Security Council, and the USA would be hard pressed to justify vetoing a Ch7 Resolution when Israel is committing a crime against humanity. And if the USA is THAT stupid then its war. But not with Hamas. It'll be war against all the Arab nations plus Iran as well. Don't expect any help if Israel follows your advice (1). NOBODY will want to be associated with a crime against humanity. Nobody. Not even Bush.

    • 275. 0 0
      Volunteering?
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:40

      Volunteering to leave 2000 years ago? So, I'm guessing you think the Romans asked the Jews of Judea politely if they wouldn't mind going into exile so the emperor could build a new bath at Caesarea? I'll bet you believe in the Easter Bunny too.

    • 274. 0 0
      Paolo
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:37

      What is the Arab claim to Palestine? That they conquered it in the 7th century from the Byzantine Empire, no? Or perhaps my biased American history texts got that wrong too? And by the way, Paolo, if you're not 6 years old, how old are you?

    • 273. 0 0
      Tosefta 72 Virgins buddy
      • FOX
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:37

      Talking about slippery slopes, you remember our discussion pertaining to pedophilia? Well since it seems to be that you have thrown your support behind Hamas and Hezbollah, which insinuates that you are in favor of the practices, it is time for you to done one of those nifty dynamite belts, say a few noble words to the camera, and go off on a journey to meet your 72 virgins. Then you can lie about tossing back grapes and telling them how intelligent you are. they will chew gum, play with each others hair, eyeing you with abject fear.

    • 272. 0 0
      Paolo, Israel's right to exist?
      • Sam
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:34

      Paolo, you still haven't answered the question. Does Israel have a right to exist? If you're answer is "no", why are you bothering to post on an Israeli newspaper? Do you actually expect Israelis to agree that they don't have a right to exist? And please don't argue history here. That's been done to death by both sides, and frankly, it no longer matters. Everyone now has a legitimate grievance, including the Jews, so let's stop with the blame game and move on to solutions. If the Arabs agree Israel has the right to exist, then peace can be worked out. If they don't, it can't. It's just that simple. So, Paolo, what do YOU think?

    • 271. 0 0
      to #13
      • bo
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:32

      Do you ask the same from your KING HUSSEIN the real Palestine is eastward of Jerusalem WHO IS SANE?

    • 270. 0 0
      #206 ChanahS gets cynical
      • Johnboy
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:30

      "Even the definition of refugee is different - any Arab who lived where isrsel is now for 2 YEARS before 1948 can claim these rights. How cynical is that?" Yes. Very cynical indeed, since you spin a blatant lie. The UNWRA definition is a WORKING definition, and is used solely to determine who is eligible for UNWRA relief assistance. That UNWRA definition has nothing to do with right of return, which will apply to: a) Palestinian refugees who live *outside* the UNWRA area of responsibility as well as those who reside *inside* the areas where the UNWRA provides aid. b) Palestinian refugees who meet criteria that HAVE YET TO BE NEGOTIATED, as per the "just solution" "in accordance with Resolution 194" of the Saudi Plan. This is all spelt out here: http://www.un.org/unrwa/overview/qa.html#c and here http://www.un.org/unrwa/overview/qa.html#e Breathtaking cynicism, or monumental ignorance. Which category do you slot into, ChanahS?

    • 269. 0 0
      They should accomodate world demands - like Israel does.
      • Apartheid
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:30

      They must have learned from the master.

    • 268. 0 0
      THE BALANCING BAR
      • WRITE IT
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:29

      maybe we Jews should ask for the right to return to Syria Iraq Iran Morocco Egypt gain back all our lands build some temples and start controlling the economies there of.

    • 267. 0 0
      #206 Sounds quite fair to me, yessiree, it does!
      • ballistic
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:25

      Two years sounds good; why are you complaining, most of the zionists are claiming rights never having set foot on the land prior to 1948, and before that thousands of years ago and even that is a dubious claim. Yup, sounds fair to me. Special consideration for the Pals cause those folks plopping zionists down KNEW there would be some BS later on, and they were right. They probably foresaw all the stealing and squatting by zionists too. Funny how some folks see into the future isn't it? Regards.

    • 266. 0 0
      Sinner # 204 Learn something
      • ChanahS
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:22

      East Jerusalem was annexed in 1967. The Israelis did recognize the right to a Palestinian state - Gaza would have been a very good start, don't you think? Instead you turned it into a launching pad. Not very encouraging, doesn't excaatly make Israeli withdraw from more areas, now does it? The Israeli army reacts to your terror activities. Kassam Rockets fired every day. The solution is simple - no terror, not IDF action. What's so hard to understand?

    • 265. 0 0
      Ibrahim # 202 You're wrong
      • ChanahS
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:18

      "They want to maintain the status quo because it allows them to continue colonizing, ethnic cleansing, and maintaining the draconian security apparatus." We would prefer maintaining the status quo becasue the Palestinians have not offered us a thing. More of the SOS. Same dedication to "resistence" (terror) same old demands, although they know that the right of return is a non -issue -nothing new under the sun. It seems as if the two clowns spend most of their negotiating to reach this agrement on how to word it so as to sound attractive. Not a thought to the actual content. Not a word about peace, cooperation, the future, the welfare of the Palestinain or Israeli people. Their only promise to their own people is to carry on the struggle in their name. I wonder how many would have preferred their leaders to have spoken about peace and hope. So yes, Israel will reject it, but not for the reasons youchoose to believe.

    • 264. 0 0
      WHAT REALLY FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
      • Dutch
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:14

      What really flies in the face of the international community is Israel's illegal occupation and settlements in the Palestinian territories. The Palestinian people are well within their rights under inter- national law to resist their Israeli occupiers whereas israel is not. The Prime Minister and his spokemen ought to be ashamed to represent such a backward country in the Middle East . Not to mention how the oppression of the Palestinian people shames both the Holocaust victims & Israel as a Jewish state. Still, most colonial powers have seen the light and have restored the sovereign rights to the indigenious people. Israel should too. Dutch

    • 263. 0 0
      Fear works, Quiet night in Chechnya
      • FOX
      • 16.03.07
      • 00:14

      Fear works, no doubt about it. Europe didn't care much about the Pals, they cheered Israel's 67 victory with the knowledge that Israel defeated five Arab armies who were out to wipe them off the map. when and why did it all change? Pals attacked the olympics, they highjacked European jets and blew up a few people in Paris bombings. Europe got scared! The Americans cheered as well, until the oil embargo and the Twin towers and then Americans were scared as well. After daily Hamas bombings in Israel, Sharon took off the gloves and popped Yassin and Rantisi. Shhhhh Tonight all is quiet in Grozny, a few Soviet tanks rumble through the snow lined streets. Why? Putin knew the west would do nothing, after the Bezlan school massacre he also took off the gloves and got rid of the lunatics. You can only make peace with men of peace, not slithering liars, who have just pulled off a media event to help the Europeans off the hook. Where's Alan Johston

    • 262. 0 0
      Dino baby
      • FOX
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:56

      Hams' motto is blow yourself up, then you can go to paradise and make all the love you like. In other words Make war, followed by love. But then again, paradise sounds more like a weird orgy with paranoid virgins then something that I would associate with love. Just imagine it, 72 pre-teen virgins, all chewing bubble gum and complaining about their hair. 'Oh My God!'

    • 261. 0 0
      Take a GOOD look at....
      • Blogowitz
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:55

      those suits. Are they really so rotund? Or is this the product of Arafat's old tailor who stitched in the teflon armor underneath?? Scroll up to the picture and vote!! Also get the tailor's phone number and post it. He at least should get some free advertising....

    • 260. 0 0
      To sinner - Yes
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:50

      There are organizations in the UN that exist specifically to pass resolutions against Israel (if you doubt this, you look at a list of resolutions against any country over time). The reason that "demanding" is much more effective against the Palestinians than Israel is that the PA is practically %100 dependent on aid, while Israel receives aid but does not depend on it for existance. As for YOUR demands, Israel follows them already. That is why Israel offered the Palestinians a state twice. And don't say it wasn't enough, because there was no counter-offer. It's so much more difficult to reason than be emotional, isn't it, sinner?

    • 259. 0 0
      #18 Johnboy to #3 Paulo
      • hala
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:37

      Dear Johnboy of Australia: At this very moment I am holding in my hands a book which I was perusing while glancing at the postings. It is titled "The Family of Man," a photo book which holds 503 pictures from 68 countries, published for the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1955. On page 80 there is a photo from Palestine, Arab women at a loom, on page 95, there is a photo from Israel, children dancing, on page 110, there is a photo from Israel, a native-looking woman, on page 122 there is a photo from Palestine, an Arab boy writing in Arabic on a blackboard. I collect old books and National Geographic magazines. One US geography schoolbook from 1935 has Palestine, not Israel, on a map of the Middle East and Palestine listed in the index of countries. Yet you say THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PALESTINE. That is wishful thinking. Even if you burn all the books, educated people will still know a lie from a lie, no matter how often and how stridently it is voiced.

    • 258. 0 0
      Interesting article
      • Ahmed
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:36

      I think this article will make us think twice of what is asked and what really needs to be done. Plus I think it's fair. pls read. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-makdisi11mar11,0,2601983.story?coll=la-opinion-center

    • 257. 0 0
      IF THE TRUTH MATTERS...
      • Brant
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:29

      If the truth matters then we all owe thanks to Jeff Northridge for his post at #205. Read and re-read it. It contains not his truth or a version I happen to like; it contains THE truth. Everything else is myth, mythology, doctrine, diatribe and propaganda. Israel sticks to its guns because it knows the true story. Arab propaganda has been assisted first by the Nazis; then deliciously for decades by the Russians and East Germans (some of the greatest creators of the "turnaroud" and of doublespeak) and now by Europeans and wide-eyed innocent leftists who have bought into this ridiculous 5 million Palestinian refugees creation. That Israel has been incapable of exposing that lie for what it is, is a shame. But all the bleating by all the Palestinian apologists does not alter the truth. It's time they finally realized that is is they who must compromise if they want something they never had before and that never existed before; a country or state called Palestine.

    • 256. 0 0
      #108 zionist forever to 3 - Paulo
      • hala
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:23

      Dear aionist forever: You write very thoughtful and intelligent posts. Concerning the law of return, it is true that allowing all the millions of descendants of the Arabs who left their homes in 1948 would be impossible demographically. But I do wonder aabout the following comment in your post: "I have never heard of any refugee situation like that how can a child born March 2007 have the same status as adult who left in 1948..." So how does a child born in the 1900's have the same status as an adult who left in AD 134? The millions of descendants of Jews who left Judaea/renamed Palestine in AD 134 all do have the right to return, even converts who have no possible connection to the exiles of AD 134 have the right to return. This is what puzzles me.

    • 255. 0 0
      # 199 Paualo - no its not
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:20

      "You forget that this is the international standard, this isnt something that applies to just Palestinians but is a right that is inherent to all human beings. " Since UNWRA was created to look after the Paletinians, new guidelines for refugees were created that apply to exclusively to the Palestinians. No other refugee group in this world has the "right of return" to the same degree as have the Palestinians. Even the definition of refugee is different - any Arab who lived where isrsel is now for 2 YEARS before 1948 can claim these rights. How cynical is that? You can check it for yourself.

    • 254. 0 0
      "Stronger stance - finally"
      • Yellowbirdwoman
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:10

      Palestine is standing strong and I am proud of their indigenous people. Palestine has eternity on their side regardless of the lawlessness of Isreal. Fear and desperation will only make Israel weaker and weaker as the years go by. Stand strong and proud Palestine.

    • 253. 0 0
      Tosefta
      • Ben Gurion
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:10

      "In the process of its admission as member of the UN in 1949, Israel made a few commitments regarding compensation to refugees and, while accusing other Arab states of creating this problem, declared that it is "earnestly anxious to contribute to the solution of this problem", but in the context of a full peace agreement. .... If Israel refuses, it may be accused of receiving its UN membership thru fraud and have it taken away from it." Tosefta Congratulations; you finally got it almost right - glad to see you are being more precise, and that you finally read the document, rather then just making general blanket statements. Of course the notion of "fraud" you bring up at the end is laughable - but I can understand, based on your general way of thinking how you might think that - don't take it from me - ask a legal expert. Maybe you're not as dense as I thought. Although the fact that you think that the Lebanese/Israel is in dispute, makes me wonder.

    • 252. 0 0
      @ 151 Kamal
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:09

      Who says our Zionist enterprise is not a success? Considering that we're surrounded by billions of people Arabs who've been trying to get rid of us for the past 60 years and more, I think so far we've done a pretty good job of it. A vibrant democratic country with a healthy economy and enormous investments in many of our industries, trade with most important countries - and all without oil too. I think in fact we've done better than all the 22 Arab countries in the Middle East - even those that are rolling in oil money. I know this doesn't gel with your theories, but that's the way it is. Live with it.

    • 251. 0 0
      @ 151 Kamal
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:09

      Who says our Zionist enterprise is not a success? Considering that we're surrounded by billions of people Arabs who've been trying to get rid of us for the past 60 years and more, I think so far we've done a pretty good job of it. A vibrant democratic country with a healthy economy and enormous investments in many of our industries, trade with most important countries - and all without oil too. I think in fact we've done better than all the 22 Arab countries in the Middle East - even those that are rolling in oil money. I know this doesn't gel with your theories, but that's the way it is. Live with it.

    • 250. 0 0
      @ 151 Kamal
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:09

      Who says our Zionist enterprise is not a success? Considering that we're surrounded by billions of people Arabs who've been trying to get rid of us for the past 60 years and more, I think so far we've done a pretty good job of it. A vibrant democratic country with a healthy economy and enormous investments in many of our industries, trade with most important countries - and all without oil too. I think in fact we've done better than all the 22 Arab countries in the Middle East - even those that are rolling in oil money. I know this doesn't gel with your theories, but that's the way it is. Live with it.

    • 249. 0 0
      tosefta "the blind mice olmert/livni"
      • yishuv
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:06

      yes tosefta but it is your heart that is blind.

    • 248. 0 0
      129 Gili: Palestinians demands are racist
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:05

      They want to have a state free of pal Christians as well. Go figure.

    • 247. 0 0
      #205 Jeff northridge #194fatahsuppo
      • Labhras
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:05

      Jeff, you know very well as you have been told several times that Israel was accepted into the UN (Res 273)based on their promise(for what that is worth)to abide by resolution 181 and 194. Stop the lies Jeff do your bonuses depend on lies.As was stated earlier by Tosefta, Israel could be seen to have gotten their UN membership through fraud if they refuse to address 242/194.Allow refugees to return and compensate those that do not wish to.Too much of that mountain air.

    • 246. 0 0
      127. fatah supporter: Not in ?your? agenda?
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:02

      Maybe you support fatah because you do not know what it is about. Jihad is not in your agenda? Can you tell me what the al-aqsa murderers brigades are? And Hams isn?t a jihadist organization either, is it? I recommend you read their charters. I see you do not like jihad so you support that organization just out of ignorance.

    • 245. 0 0
      tosefta"the right for resistance to an occupation
      • yishuv
      • 15.03.07
      • 23:01

      is a natural right." why should we be surprised at anything you say.you have already advised hizb to rocket the women and children in the settlements.

    • 244. 0 0
      # 135 Fatah supporter
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:58

      The saddest thing about your posts is that you don't even know how ignorant, childish and silly you sound. The little you do say amounts to meaningless threats and nothing more, yet they tell a lot about how brainwashed and ignorant you really are. My suspician is that there are many out there who agree with you. Poor Palestinians.

    • 243. 0 0
      Sinner #203
      • GABE1
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:56

      If it was up to me I would tell the Balestinians that Judea and Samaria is Jewish Sovereign Land and advise Jordan that they have 6 months to take their citizens out of there NO IFS OR BUTS. I would give the Neverlanders two options : JORDAN OR GAZA. No other demands are needed. They can enjoy themselves in Jordan or in that Rat hole called Gaza.

    • 242. 0 0
      International Demands and the risks
      • Labhras
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:55

      What is the sense in continuing a blockade of Palestine while Hamas is sharing in Government. This only serves to radicalise Hamas and defeat the very purpose of geting them to be more moderate.They are being asked to recognise Israel when ther are many Rab governments out there who do not. We are telling the Saudis and the other Arab states who helped to broker the Mecca agreement to keep their noses out. Yet they are expected to play a constructive role on the US,s and Europe,s side when both their prestige is at rock bottom in that region. The US,S Hypocracy is so evident given that it requested the UK to tread lightly with the IRA to avoid radicalising them.

    • 241. 0 0
      Tosefta, THE FACIST
      • FOX
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:54

      Tossi supports the Hezbollah as a freedom fighting organization. while he is also the first to tout UN resolutions when Israel is the culprit he has no problem with the fact that the hezbollah has not alowed any information pertaining to the Israelis they hold. he is also a supporter of Hamas, disregarding their stated arms and supporting illusory statements. he also has no problem with the fact that Hamas holds an Israeli soldier and has not allowed the Red Cross or any of the hundreds of foreign UN workers in Gaza to visit the soldier. Tossi's whims would hold more water if his cries for justice were less subjective and slanted against Israel. For a centrist Zionist he sounds more like a Far Right or Far Left anti-semite. But then again I live here and I got the vote, and any government that let's Hamas off the hook, will get the hook.

    • 240. 0 0
      180 Mark of Lewiston: Jumping to Conclusions
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:54

      If they want to kill each other among themselves, it is their business. Besides, while they are at it, they leave the others alone.

    • 239. 0 0
      Paulo -- Some of us are still waiting to read your
      • Nahum Giladi
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:51

      response to the question of whether we, Jews, have the right to live in our state of Israel, or whether the Jewish state of Israel has the right to exist. Your latest statement as I undertand it has been that we don't. Have you changed your mind since?

    • 238. 0 0
      khalid 1
      • alan
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:46

      palestinians should have their right to return as long as jews and everyone else on this planet has the same right. Why do you think palestinians have some special right ?

    • 237. 0 0
      right of return
      • ghazi
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:44

      how can any one deny a human being a basic right mentioned in the human rights charter

    • 236. 0 0
      paulo
      • anyuci
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:41

      In this case this would be the first exalmple, that a state orders an other to accept millions of emigrants. Does international law agree with that? Probably this act would lead to a real catasrophy over hear. that nobody needs, Isarelis or Palestinians neighter

    • 235. 0 0
      paulo's not too bright is he?
      • randy
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:41

      paulo's words - "If my opinions are so ill-informed then please I invite you personally to challenge them rather than engage in an innate argument about my elementary education in Lisboa." ------------------- you want an innate argument not an inane one. innate = used to describe an inherent or intrinsic characteristic or property of some thing, such as a quality or capability which is possessed since birth. inane = lacking significance, meaning, or point. i dont want to split hares but . . . stupid is as stupid does.

    • 234. 0 0
      UGY the she-camel`s owner
      • Tosefta
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:40

      Thank you for the friendly offer, but I am not sure we will be able to walk our pets together. Dumbite has a problem; he cannot recognize any evolutionary change, in houses or streets or empty lots. If a new house is built, Dumbite will still run into the courtyard and pee on the trees as if nothing has changed. Causes me much embarrassment and even trouble, which you should avoid.

    • 233. 0 0
      Palestinian Plight
      • Robert Ennis
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:39

      I am Jewish and wholeheartedly support Israel. But I also sympathize with the plight of the ordinary Palestinians. Unfortunately, their cause has been hijacked by murderers, liars and thieves who care nothing about their plight. If there were any good will whatever among the Palestinian leadership, peace would have been achieved in 1948, 1967, 1993, 2000, or today. As long as their leadership insists on everything, Palestinians will get nothing (except suffering, of course). The hardships placed on Palestinians with checkpoints and with security fences are strictly to maintain Israeli security. Ordinary Israelis are not happy about the situation but recognize that tough security measures are absolutely necessary. Last year Israeli leadership courageously evacuated its own citizens from Gaza as a test and good will gesture. They got Hamas and rockets in return. How can any reasonable, unbiased person expect Israel give up even an iota of additional security under these conditions?

    • 232. 0 0
      #153
      • Labhras
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:35

      So when are you going to take your own advice.

    • 231. 0 0
      fatah supporter
      • eynav
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:35

      " no peace. YOU are in arab land, you should follow arab rules." SO WHEN we KICK your ass back to the 6th centry will you stop crying like stuffed pig

    • 230. 0 0
      #181 re #161 Fred Farkelsteinman
      • Labhras
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:32

      Judging by the style and content ,(or rather lack of) I may be wasting my time but what the hell. Google UN and then under resolutions search for res 273 and read.Pay particular attention to res194. Therein lies the solution to your confusion.it is just a google away. Have a good day.

    • 229. 0 0
      The Jews
      • Jim
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:29

      Stop picking on the Jews. That land is thiers. You need to read a copy of the deed its called the bible. Divinely given to them and affirmed throughout the old ansd new testaments. Sooner or later this will all be fulfilled as every prediction of the Hebrew prophets will come about and Messiah will return. Islam will be destroyed on the mountains of Israel. Ezekiel 37 thru 39. The Jewish prophets never miss. Allah is the moon god not the God of Abraham When all the dust of nuclear war settles Israel wiull still be there as Hebrew prophets said

    • 228. 0 0
      #194
      • Jane
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:29

      As the Rolling Stones sang, "You can't always get what you wa-ant"

    • 227. 0 0
      #182 Israeli
      • Labhras
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:26

      Check Israel,s acceptance into the UN . RES 273. Israel committed to abiding by Resolutions 181 and 194 the latter which gaurantees the "Right of Return or compensation" for those refugees not wishing to return. Google UN and then search under resolutions . Hope that clears it up for you and saves you wasted time.

    • 226. 0 0
      fatah supporter # 194 Then Come And Get It
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:10

      Howdy Fatah Supporter; There is no such thing as a "right of return" unless it is granted by the country in question. UNSCR 194 mentions the desirability of refugees returning to their homes, but it is not binding nor enforceable and was replaced by UNSCR 242 which calls for a "just settlement" of the refugee problem. Israel has already absorbed most of the 860,000 Jewish refugees generated between 1948 and 1967. Of the 750,000 Palestinian refugees who for the most part voluntarily fled in 1948 most of them were tenant farmers, renters, or migrant workers who owned no property. Most of these are deceased. The vast majority of the approximately 4 million so-called "Palestinian refugees" today were born outside of the State of Israel and are not her responsibility. If you want your Islamic Waqf lands of Israel, Spain, and southeastern Europe back again, then come and get them. Good luck!

    • 225. 0 0
      Does anybody demand anything to the Israeli Gvt
      • sinner
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:06

      If somebody would (...) demand the Israeli government to adhere to three demands of the international community - follow previous agreements - accept Palestine's right to exist - no violence (and state terror) .... it would just be a joke. In addition, settlement building would continue, East Jerusalem would be annexed and changed once and for all to make sure that a Palestinian State could never function or even exist.

    • 224. 0 0
      israel does not want peace
      • gabistan
      • 15.03.07
      • 22:01

      the israeli government makes me nauseous.

    • 223. 0 0
      Mark Of Lewiston, you are far too level headed
      • Ibrahim
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:56

      What you see out of Israel is similar to what we saw from the Bush admin in the runup to the Iraq War...nothing was good enough, no to this, no to that...they wanted WAR... With Israel and her supporters it is the same: They want to maintain the status quo because it allows them to continue colonizing, ethnic cleansing, and maintaining the draconian security apparatus. There is nothing particularly breathtaking about Hamas' statement....but the Israeli firster will always spin it the same... NO to peace talks at all costs. It's a pity, but history is hardly ever kind to those who reject normalizing relations with one's neighbors.

    • 222. 0 0
      to#135 fatah supporter
      • Alex
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:48

      I complitli agri whit u israel shuld live by arab ruls kiling arabs athey kiling israelis good opoint,

    • 221. 0 0
      right of return #77
      • eynav benjamin
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:44

      Double Click if you think the Arabs would let Jews live in there country in peace you are a fool or a liar or you?re a ?no brainier? please pick one

    • 220. 0 0
      189. Lisa and The good guy
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:38

      All of us know hamas is a movement, an islamofascist movement, to be exact, part of the global jihad, as hamas itself claims in its charter. That is why some of us don?t like it A movement like that cannot be the good guy because it is evil. We discussed that poll here. It is known there are anti-Semites all around the world and some media too, one of them being BBC.

    • 219. 0 0
      re: Ilya #195
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:36

      "You still remember the distance between Lisbon and Tel Aviv which you claimed is...a short trip away" - You do realise I can fly to Israel and be back in Portugal in time for dinner. If that is not a 'short trip' then I dont know what is. "Which you claimed is not hundreds of miles" - I never said this you made it up. Idiot.

    • 218. 0 0
      re: Zionist #108
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:32

      "I have never heard of any refugee situation...how a child can be born in 2007 have the same status as an adult who left Israel is 1948" - You say you have never heard of such a thing well please let me enlighten you. You have Afghanis coming home for the very first time since Taliban rule and the Timorese returning to Timor-Leste. You forget that this is the international standard, this isnt something that applies to just Palestinians but is a right that is inherent to all human beings. "The territory the Palestinians claim...legally doesnt belong to them" - Well the international community maintains a different standard, that land occupied illegally since 1967 is Palestinian. "If Hamas crashed planes into a skyscraper...would that be legitimate resistance" - Its just as legitimate as Israel dropping hundreds of thousands of cluster bombs over Lebanon's residential areas of the south as the war was drawing to a close. So tell me again how you are innocent?

    • 217. 0 0
      This is NOT a government!!
      • Blogowitz
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:31

      What orthodox government advocates violence, lies, murder, and death? And still is accepted by the world community? Apparently, the PA/PLO under a unified banner of terror. Neither Abbas or Haniyeh are playing this farce well. When Arafat did it, the UN/EU/US thought he might actually be looking to help his people. Lie, lie, lie--but it sure fooled Jimmy Carter....and now NO ONE should be fooled. These "leaders" are on the grand stage of exposure--a platform of ignorance--since they have AGREED to continue "resistance" (that's TERROR, in case you only read the article once)!

    • 216. 0 0
      #1 Khalid Palestinians lost their soul and hearts
      • Haham Me Bat Yam
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:28

      a long time ago. When a people are taken pver by terrorist and gangsters as is the case of the Palestininas on WB and in Gaza they lost their right to a nationhood and a state. Your terrorist way of blowing buses, wedding halls, schools, bakeries and attemting to blow up hospitals like the lady treated at Soroka who try to blow up the few weeks later Hospital is a sign of a corrisve maliase among your people. You blew it starting with the following of Yassir Arafat who showed to be a simple terrorist dictator and not willing to run PA in democratic ways. he was also stealling the aid money for his "family" in France. After him you elected by a big majority the terrorist Hamas. You should have your first song next year at Eurofest: Don't cry for me Palestina, I am Suha and I am well taken care Off....La, La, La

    • 215. 0 0
      re: Eric #87
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:25

      "The support of irrealistic ideas such as the so called right of return" - I support this ideal as a basis for human rights for all people, regardless of race, religion and territory. Id much rather maintain the very standards of humanity that are designated by the UN and be called and 'idealist' then become some critically-deficient North American.

    • 214. 0 0
      3. Paulo: The Intl Standard
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:24

      Those rights are also for Jews. So, if the pals attack and Israel retaliates, I hope nobody protests.

    • 213. 0 0
      #19: that isn't what they mean by resistance
      • Paul Freedman
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:21

      Click: before you don your suicide belt, by resistance they mean open-ended war against the Zionist entity, that, by their charter "occupies" the Palestinian wakf from river to sea. This is primarily a problem for the EU that now has to contort itself to get money to cash-starved but ever-feisty Hamas.

    • 212. 0 0
      FATAH BOY
      • Bosshog
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:20

      Why do you think you have any position to intimedate Israel or anybody else. Who do you think you are scaring with your resistence. How far has it gotten you and your pal monkies. You have this fantasy that we are cowaring in are homes like mice hoping you don't get mad. Who cares, We as a nation are stronger, smarter and much more paitent then you. You should thank Allah everyday you still are breathing. Your idealogy is twisted and without foundation. Go resist all you want. We stand back and pick you off the fence like pigeon sh-ting on the wall. Please return to your home land of your ancestors by all means I will even chip in for your ticket. It will be nowhere close to Israel as it has never been and never will. It is justice that you pals are taken the blame for all the land grabbing and war your muzzy brothers have caused for years to all people of the world. Sleep well fatah boy the Idf is knocking on your temperary door and there is no other place with a open door for you.

    • 211. 0 0
      The total outrageous cheek of Israel
      • Clickfool
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:19

      ""Instead of recognizing Israel and renouncing terror the emerging Palestinian government has decided to spring backwards," said David Baker, spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office. "This is not what we were hoping for and flies in the face of the international community's demands of the Palestinians. Once again, they haven't provided the goods," he added." Israel wants total surrender from the Palestinians. It wants them to offer recognition, abandon the armed struggle against their cruelty and occupation and to acquiesce in the land theft that has already taken place. And what is it offering in return? Nothing. No promise to stop stealing land, no cancellation of the new settlement at Maskiot, no suspension of Landgrab Wall building, not even firm peace talks...nothing. The only thing that is likely to happen is that the criminal starvation blockade imposed by the two co-conspirators, Israel and America, might - just might - be lifted. Chutzpah - they name is Israel.

    • 210. 0 0
      To bookworm TAZ
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:08

      read more. About West and East civilisation, learn...usually whos the bad guy, you no manner geek.

    • 209. 0 0
      Can BBC still report on Israel?
      • FOX
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:08

      Yes, the question has to be asked. while I was painting today, I listened to the BBC. What struck me for most of the morning was the BBC's bizarre and eery silence regarding the whereabouts and fate of their intrepid reporter Alan Johnston. I understand that the BBC does not want to upset his kidnappers. Not until 2:00PM Israeli time did they mention his name. He was part of a report which praised Haniyeh of Hamas, for saying that he would look into the issue. so if the BBC is too scared to ruffle Hamas feathers, then maybe they should refrain, until the return of Johnston, from reporting at all from Palestine. it is painfully obvious that at this time when they worry about the fate of Johnson that they cannot be free to criticize elements that have kidnapped the gentleman. This feeling of fear will forever sit like a black cloud over BBC reporting in the future.

    • 208. 0 0
      Toronto's Finest - your comment is too stupid to take seriously
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:07

      I would not use the adjective "finest" if I were you. It is an insult to people from the beautiful city of Toronto.

    • 207. 0 0
      "The interest of the pal people?
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:04

      Beware, pals. By this, the hamas-fatah government mean they will keep you at war, as usual.

    • 206. 0 0
      fatah supporter
      • inigo montoya
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:03

      However, that has not happened. Palestine was comprised of Jewish AND Arab Palestinians. Then, 80% was given independence and renamed Jordan. The remaining 20% was to be partitioned into 2 states w/ borders and govts based on demographic MAJORITY. Jews accepted, Arabs rejected and promised genocide. And they tried and failed. (Also, according to the UNRWA about 1/3 of all "palestinian refugees" NEVER lived in palestine and never had ancestors who did either...fakes seeking welfare payments.

    • 205. 0 0
      Starving palestinians
      • Philippe
      • 15.03.07
      • 21:00

      Look at haniyeh's photo and come again claiming the palestinians are starving. What a laugh.

    • 204. 0 0
      UN Resolution 194 but???
      • a wandering Jew
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:59

      UN Resolution 194-but it is subject to "implied" interpretations and conditions.

    • 203. 0 0
      to blinded by hate fatah guy
      • TAZ
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:59

      you seem so angry and confused that I just can't leave you alone....your anger blinds you......the philisophical quote by Neitzche you ripped on also applies to the people you see as enemies.....so now do you like the quote a little better.----- blind hate

    • 202. 0 0
      Oslo R.I.P
      • Philippe
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:58

      This is a negation of the OSlo accords which established the PA and that The PA is now renouncing. In all logics, Israel should re-occupy the territories expell or arrest the PA officials and fight themselves against terror. Like they did successfully before 1993.

    • 201. 0 0
      Fatah Supporter - how does that answer what I said?
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:58

      The international community did not save us from you and your Arab brothers. Allah did. Examine your own way of thinking. Use your head. If the Jews don't fight you like you fight them, why is it? Life is more important than honor.

    • 200. 0 0
      to Chuck#104
      • Ilya
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:56

      That is what I propose. Palestinian state is created in WB and Gaza with East Jerusalem as a capital of Palestinian state. Holly sites are made accessible to every body regardless where sites are. Refugees can settle anywhere on the territory of the Palestinian state NOT in Israel. Borders of the states have to be defined through negotiations. That is briefly. I wonder if I?ll be the only one proposing anything?

    • 199. 0 0
      KUTW's once upon a time
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:55

      Palestinian shall not know "once upon a time".

    • 198. 0 0
      what a surprise...abdul.
      • maria
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:52

      I thought all arabs were siding with palestinians.

    • 197. 0 0
      about Neitzche comment to fatah idiot
      • TAZ
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:47

      maybe you should shut your mouth and open a book on philosophy...or is that illegal where you are from or are you just too much of a fool to actually read a whole book?

    • 196. 0 0
      Credible Enemies
      • Spyglass
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:46

      No one can doubt that the Hamas leaders mean what they say. They are true, bloodthirsty enemies of Israel and of the Jews everywhere. The threat they represent is another matter entirely. The more credible threat to Israel's well-being is the government of Israel that - perhaps under irresistable pressure - unilaterally ties the hands that would defend the Israelis from their murderous neighbors.

    • 195. 0 0
      to Paulo#43
      • Ilya
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:45

      Now I know where the problem is. See most of the people nowadays get more then elementary education even in Lisboa. I was always wondering why you have a habit of calling people idiots in the first sentence of your reply but elementary education explains it all. I hope you still remember the distance between Lisbon and Tel Aviv which you claimed is not hundreds of miles but a short trip away.

    • 194. 0 0
      Professor DavikAK
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:45

      Your denial of right of return is Bull_S. like a woman wailings "2000 years ago, we lives here...is our homeland..is jews land..god gave us" we live her decades ago, we want it back.

    • 193. 0 0
      Naim S. Mahlab - Allah yirhamak
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:44

      I descend from some of those Jewish refugees. Thank you for understanding others. I hope there will be more like you.

    • 192. 0 0
      # 128 Adam and "make love not war"....
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:42

      Adam, to be honest, I wouldn't expect from the Hamas guys to "make love" with Israelis. If they only would restrain in the future from rocket and suicide attacks, that would be more than enough (emotional) "nearness". At least for now...:)

    • 191. 0 0
      Tosefta HA HA HAMAS!!
      • Danite
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:41

      Cheers for hamas he says!! Tell me Tosefta in what world are you living.You are the most self deluded person I have seen in ages.You simply blind yourself to reality,you are one major wierdo buddy.Happy trails to la la la land!

    • 190. 0 0
      Why doesn?t Hamas explain?
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:37

      Why doesn?t the terrorist gang explain clearly -that by ?resistance?, they mean ?jihad? -that ?occupation? means that the Jewish country was once occupied by Muslims and so, by jihad rules, it belongs to Islam forever. Herein, the true owners of the country, the Jews, are called ?occupiers?. -that ?right to return? means ?invasion. -that ?independence? means depriving the true owners of Israel, the Jews, of their land and the annexation of Israel to the ?Great Arab Nation?.

    • 189. 0 0
      What if HAMAS IS the GOOD guy?
      • Lisa
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:34

      Israel, with all due respect, lets look at all sides of the equation. Its only when we find the truth will you be safe. Hamas according to George Soros is a movement - by the people for the people. IOA/IOF is an occuping army or organization. BBC news in 2007 launched a survey that said Israel is the least like country in the world. Why did this survey say that? Who is the terror "ORGANIZATION" not "MOVEMENT"?

    • 188. 0 0
      # 52 Danite and Hamas
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:31

      Danite, I am just not having enough Insight into the inner thinking of Hamas to make a judgement about their long term goals. However I do believe that Hamas, like any other movement in this world does have a more extreme as well as a more "moderate" wing. Hanijeh is definitely part of the more "modera- te" wing. So I still think it would be worth for the West as well as Israel to use the backdoor-diplomatic channels and start engaging them into a serious discussion (you won't have to lift all the sanctions for that). As a Swiss I can tell you, there is never any- thing wrong with talking, as long as you keep firm on certain positions. The British decided to start a serious discus- sion with the IRA a few years ago, and it paied off. And believe me, the IRA guys were quite an exteme bunch of people, not a piece of cake to deal with them....

    • 187. 0 0
      Time out is needed
      • Brod
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:30

      Israel, America and the West need to take time off on this indefinitely. There is no point working on this because the dark forces think they can get away with their craps. It is time for Israel and America to forget about this indefinitely till the dark forces come to their senses and learn to reject hate, belligerence and violence and become peaceful nation builders. Until then, it is a waste of time, resources and effort to deal with the dark forces. The world should pressure the dark forces states to accommodate their fellow dark forces in their own vast countries. The dark forces should stop encroaching in Israel and trying to usurp Israel's biblical and historic homeland from the Jews.

    • 186. 0 0
      #168 moises, if, will,
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:29

      Q.DID ARABS THREW ISRAELIS TO THE SEA? A.No, because IDF & IAF were brilliant. Right?? "then you cry to the international community" which WW2 german victim cried to the international community and plotted zionism. Do not denied.

    • 185. 0 0
      Haniyeh?s nerve
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:28

      Haniyeh acknowledged that winning Israeli support would be difficult.

    • 184. 0 0
      JOE in RALaLAh
      • Timmy in NYC
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:28

      "I`v got twin towers in New York to sell you." Joe you are a typical wiseguy Arab with nothing to sell but words and hatred because like a muslim terrorist you already did your work on those buildings. May you try & play hide the salimi with all your virgins BUT THE JOKE WILL BE ON YOU because you'll go there where ever without a salimi.

    • 183. 0 0
      canaan belong to the jewish people.
      • maria
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:27

      God, as Judge of the universe, brought judgment upon the wicked practices of the heathen people in the land of canaan. HE ordered the Israelites to destroy all of the canaanites and their neighbors. the israelites obeyed only PARTLY,and the wicked nations that were LEFT caused them many problems in the years come. ...in about seven years, much of CANAAN was under Israel's control, and the LAND was divided among the TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL. .....the palestinians are taught in school that Jesus and Moses are Palestinians.what a LIE! HAARETZ, PLEASE POST THIS.

    • 182. 0 0
      Right of Return in international law? (Fred Frankenstein #161)
      • Israeli
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:27

      Which International law are you referring to? Where is it written? You will save all of us a lot of problem by just pointing out the law to us.

    • 181. 0 0
      Fred Farkelsteinman #161
      • Gee
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:26

      'Israeli can whine all they want, but the right of return to Palestinian refugees is guaranteed under international law' Pure and utter bullshit. There is no such law.

    • 180. 0 0
      Jumping to Conclusions
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:25

      I must be naive. I see lots of flexibility in the language of the Palestinian statement. What is recognition of a refugee issue? What does "respect" mean? What form of "resistence?" To me, these are intangibles. It would be prudent to see how events play out. See if the unified Fatah-Hamas coalition stops violence in Gaza and from Gaza. See if the PIJ rockets from Gaza stop, perhaps at unity security forces insistence.

    • 179. 0 0
      Isn?t it a contradiction?
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:25

      On the one hand, the unity government says they will continue jihad on Israel and, on the other, that they will respect previous agreements with Israel. The first commitment you came to in previous agreements is to stop attacking Israel.

    • 178. 0 0
      Once a Terrorist Gang Always a Terrorist Gang
      • Jane
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:22

      Whay is anyone surprised? Did you honestly believe Abbas and Haneya were forming a sewing circle or a new democratic Palestinian State? Give me a break. They are only manuvering to try and get the worlds welfare back and building up their forces and weapons in the meantime. While they blame Israel for poverty and starvation the war against Israel continues.

    • 177. 0 0
      When terrorists come together
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:21

      the purpose cannot be good. It has an advantage, though. The Fatah gang has unveiled its true face. They have always been at it. I still remember Abbas praising the suicide bombers as heroes and, at the same time, pretending he was a man of peace. It has now been made clear, pals are a rogue state.

    • 176. 0 0
      kamal There is NO Palestiane
      • Abdul
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:20

      Only stupid PHILISTINES like you! FOOL, you are boxing with the moon. The world says to Our unholy arab legion in Gaza to HELL, you can go now!

    • 175. 0 0
      PA not ready to govern
      • Sam
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:19

      It's obvious that the PA govt. is not serious about having a state. These Arabs are nothing more than Ex-Jordanians and Ex-Egyptians who were left stranded after the Arabs ill-fated war against Israel in '67. Israel should have relocated all of them to their existing countries after the war. Now the left leaning, pro-Arab oil, anti-Jewish European states can't do enough for these misfits of the middle east. These Arabs (aka Palestinians) have been pawns for two generations and will continue to be pawns for the next 50 yrs. What is the definition of losers?

    • 174. 0 0
      # 42 Lynn and the refugee problem
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:19

      Lynn, in a just world, the refugees should be allowed to return. But since this isn't a just world, they will have to live with the (sad) fact that they can't. The same way the Schlesien Germans and many, many others had to find a way to live with it (actually some of them are still "fighting" today for their right of return). So you see this is a very emotional issue, and the International community will have to be (financially) gracious with the Palesti- nian refugees. By the way, as critical as I am when it comes to certain Israeli policies, there are not many countries around the world, where I have as much comprehension that they won't let all the refugess come back as Israel. Simply for historical reasons.

    • 173. 0 0
      World War TWO
      • Jimbo
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:18

      Dear Friends, Arabs, including "palistinians" backed the Germans in WW2. When the West won that war the LOSERS lose something. In this case it was decided tha the Jews, who were kicked out of Arab countries over the last 2,000 years had the "right of return", to the land promised by Allah(PBUH) to Moses(PBUH), the land of Milk and Honey. Do Muslims dispute Allahs will that is spoken to Moses that Allahs people be given this land? Does it state anywhere that Allah recinds his covenent with His people? I do not recall Allah expressing His desire for Muslims to be given any land yet I can show and every religion of the book understands Allahs agreement with the Jews, the Hebrews, the Israilites, that the land of Milk and Honey belongs to the Jews, forever. Can you show me otherwise?

    • 172. 0 0
      Dumb yourself, "Fatah Supporter"!
      • DavidAK
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:15

      Your nasty epithet to KUTW should NEVER have been allowed on this Talkback. As it happens, KUTW is far more educated on the subject than you seem to be. Besides, your insistence on a "right of return" is a load of bull. If you accepted a 2 state solution, with peaceful coexistence, you would indeed have a right of return, but just not to the exact spot where your great grandfather may have lived -- or been a hired farmhand who came from elsewhere in the Arab world. You would get a right of return to a Palestinian state that would not encompass all of historic Palestine, just as the Jews would not get a right of return to all of their historic homeland. But you can't seem to see as "justice" anything that recognizes another people's rights, only yours. Typical, sadly.

    • 171. 0 0
      #158 umm.. Ed
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:14

      Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) words of wisdom actually refers to US and (macho/muscle) west.

    • 170. 0 0
      Smearnov #157 - Here's an interesting fact
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:14

      There has never been a case in which Muslims have lived peacefully as a minority. I challenge anybody to disprove this statement.

    • 169. 0 0
      #152, Ronnie Wolman, "lowest common denominator"
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:14

      As usual, you hit the nail right on the head; except, I would add, it is lower than the lowest common denominator. Yet they are really happy about it.

    • 168. 0 0
      Fatah Supporter - if the Jews related to you the same way
      • Moises
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:11

      ...there would be nobody left to support Fatah. You want to be all macho but when the IDF responds to the Qassams, bombings and shootings by your "brave warriors", then you cry to the international community. You want to fight but you don't want to be fought. You're lucky you're fighting against Jews, who have a concience, unlike you.

    • 167. 0 0
      Israel and American Jews do not speak for the world
      • El-Birawi
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:10

      Israel and the American Jews can speak for the White House and Congress, but not for the American people and the world. Who appointed Israel to speak for the world.. Certainly not Allah, God or G-d. Please PM be little modest. Your opinion is not the world opinion. You may have power over George Bush and Dick Cheney, and the Congress, but the world is more than that.

    • 166. 0 0
      It is a reasonable opening position for negotiations!
      • Toronto's Finest
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:08

      Or would Israel prefer.... 1.Hamas recognizes the right of Israel to exist on whatever borders it prefers. 2. The entire West Bank (Judea & Samaria) belong to Israel in perpetuity. 3.The right of return for Palestinians is ceeded, and the refugees renounce any claims for compensation. 4. Israel should draw up the borders for a Palestinian state, which Hamas will unconditionally accept. ....and you can keep all the tax revenue.

    • 165. 0 0
      #157 Smear.nov.elist, Can i ask you just 1 question?
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:07

      wtf are you mumbling about?

    • 164. 0 0
      UNITED IN TERROR,TERROR, AND TERROR
      • B
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:02

      Jekyll and Hyde of Arafat are once more united in falseness, and duplicity. Do these so-called pals care one iota for their Pal brothers that have been treated "worse than dogs" and "used as pawns" for 60 years by the Arab League. Do they want more starving Pals, by overburdening their inadequate infrastructure. They have unlawfully used western aid for terror and weapons then whine they are hungry, when one can easily see the fat faces of the leaders. One can easily see the wasted bullets fired in the air to prove their twisted arab macho and hate. Do they fight to have their brothers accepted in Arabic countries. No these jihadhist losers are ONLY interested in the gang game of destroying Israel while billions of charitable aid gets wasted on mendacity and hate, and billions get funded into terror and terror support. So sad is Arab hate that arabs treat arabs far worse than any western would ever treat them, and the masses are fooled that their suffering is for a higher purpose-JIHAD

    • 163. 0 0
      Hubba Hubba
      • Baz Mann
      • 15.03.07
      • 20:01

      "PA stance flies in the face of international demands". Really? It seems to me those are the demands of Israel and its sugar daddy only? Had it not been for the exuberant pressuer of the USA, the quartet will be more than happy to deal with any PA government including a Hamas government. In fact, practically every nation on the face of this planet condemns Israel for its actions against the Palestinians and the obstacles it continuously create whenever there is a movement towards a peaceful solution. Let's face the facts, Israel is a colonial state that has no interest whatsoever in reaching a meaningful settlement with the Palestinians or even its neighbors. It will be more than happy to dictate terms. Its end will be as violent as its begining.

    • 162. 0 0
      Arab right of return
      • peabody
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:58

      If Arabs want a right of return, why aren't they blowing up cafes in Saudi Arabia.. that is where arabs hail from isn't it?

    • 161. 0 0
      Right of Return is Enshrined in International Law
      • Fred Farkelsteinman
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:56

      Israeli can whine all they want, but the right of return to Palestinian refugees is guaranteed under international law, and thus the rights of each individual civilian to return is their right as is the right to resist the occupation of their lands by Israel. Unless Israel wants to continue to be in a state of war and wallow in the graft and corruption that permeates Israel at every level, they must work with the Palestinians as equals as Israel is equally, if not more, to blame for the Palestinians for the decades of violence that both have suffered under.

    • 160. 0 0
      Who will really suffer?!
      • Ari
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:55

      This new government will promote violence and snob their nose at the international community, what will the day to day life of Israelis and Palistinians be like.... ISRAELIS: Will suffer future suicide bombings and other Palistinian Violence. Blood will be spilled. PALS: The seige will continue, and if the PALS think they will win through violence and not negotiations... their lives will remain the same... constanct check points, targeted assiniations etc. ISRAEL WILL CLOSE THE BORDER AND CAUSE loss of work to 1000s if PALS... To quote John Lennon... "all I am saying is give peace a chance!" The average Pal will suffer far more than the average Israeli, is the PAL government really looking out for their best interest?

    • 159. 0 0
      to the PMO : for once take responability for our nation's welfare
      • Wendy
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:55

      The only thing "new" in today's first declaration by the Pal "Unity Gov't" was their first honest presentation of themselves as a unified front of emnity against us. No more the factional charade of a shell game, wherein one terrorist group assumes the mantle of "powerless moderate" while the other terrorists play the "extremists". The mask and the gloves are off, and we must face this reality. Those current "leaders" of our nation who live in denial do themselves and us no favours. They and we will be called to account if we do not face reality and accept responsability for our own national well-being instead of depending on the mythical good-will of "the international community" who have engineered this exact situation from the beginning.

    • 158. 0 0
      Nietzsche's View of "Pal Supporters"
      • Ed
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:55

      "Insanity in individuals is something rare?but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule." Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)

    • 157. 0 0
      Islam is soul and heart and core of the Palestinain problem
      • Smearnov
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:48

      The cults inability to accept other cults on it's turf, is the main source of friction. Incitment in Mosques, education and the media is another. Years of violent hate indocrination have come home to roost in your very own streets, Your generations raised up to destroy Israel, instead, devour themselves. Letting them loose on Israel's cities would be retribution and not restitution, and would only serve to increase violence and hate. I could envision a money settlement that provided the legitmately disposessed just compensation for their loss. Pals should ask their outside Arab Masters if it's OK to accept money .Don't do anything till you check with them.

    • 156. 0 0
      Israeli Proposal#1 - part 2
      • Gil
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:43

      3.) Palestinian Arabs must cede the right of return in return for which Israel will have removed Israeli citizens from what will become Palestinian territory. 4.) In addition, Israel must provide compensation to Arabs who can prove that they were displaced by Israel in 1948. The right of return must be resolved through Palestinians moving to what will be Palestine and not Israel, otherwise it makes the whole purpose of a state called Palestine seem more like Arafat's two-step solution. 5.) Israel must allow any Israeli Arabs who wish to move to Palestine to easily do so, and must compensate them adequately enough to allow them to acquire land in Palestine. 6.) All parties must apologize to each other. 7.)The Arab world, in return for Israeli concessions must renounce violence and recognize Israel's right to exist. 8.) All parties must sign a formal agreement stating that they will not initiate any violent acts against the other, and should they do so, retaliation is permissable

    • 155. 0 0
      #138 Yamin
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:43

      "You can`t talk back an arab." you mean in your world you can talk back injusticely? Could you be more specific, dont corrupt the actual subject, like just KUTW did?

    • 154. 0 0
      For Nora, on Maskiot # 134
      • Clickfool
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:42

      "How come that Clickfool knows about "Maskiot deep in the West Bank" maybe more than Sussex "The Clickfool-Land". Such perseverance in minute details makes one wonder as who is feeding information to our dear friend Clickfool." LOL! It's that very wicked Israeli publication called Haaretz that feeds such secret information to me, Nora. Do you just read the Funnies?

    • 153. 0 0
      136 - Blaming the victim?
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:41

      http://www.conceptwizard.com/pipeline_of_hatred.html As long as there is hatred, there will never be a chance for peace.

    • 152. 0 0
      Equations: Abbas+Hamas = Hamas
      • Ronnie Wolman
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:40

      The idea of a unity government is ok but because there was no demands on either of them the agreement has to be understood by the west that the unity government doesnt represent a mixture the two maybes in the forefront of Palestinian politics,but the lowest common denominator of the two. We are ONLY dealing with Hamas. We are ONLY dealing with those friends of Ahmandinejad and Assad, Baas marginalized himself to do this for he is not big or not brave enough to take the Palestinians where they need to go. And Hamas is Hamas.

    • 151. 0 0
      to steven rosenfeld
      • kamal
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:39

      you say that because you are angry. all your intelligence, power and money and all our "stupidity" didn't lead to the success of your racist zionist project. i would be angry too, if i were a jew. but i am a proud "stupid" palestinian. i also thank GOD for having enemies like you and i am happy that more and more are joining you in america and other places. this is yet another proof that you're "smart".

    • 150. 0 0
      135 - Jews have lived in Israel for 3,000 years
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:39

      The Jewish people base their claim to the Land of Israel on at least four premises: 1) the Jewish people settled and developed the land; 2) the international community granted political sovereignty in Palestine to the Jewish people; 3) the territory was captured in defensive wars and 4) God promised the land to the patriarch http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/nutshell/conflict_2.html

    • 149. 0 0
      Do onto others as you want done to you
      • Billy Jack
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:38

      The force and energy used to beat them down and remove them,will be used against you.That is human nature.Their is nothing devine about it.

    • 148. 0 0
      #133 was meant for Joe #112...
      • Maurice
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:36

      ...not for 108. Sorry for the error.

    • 147. 0 0
      96 - Hamas wants to destroy Israel - That is moderate?
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:35

      What is extreme then? Here in there own words Hamas says they want to destroy Israel: http://www.pmw.org.il/tv-hamas.htm

    • 146. 0 0
      Game over. Proper course is to erase Oslo concessions.
      • Dr. L. Brnd
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:35

      The "Palestinians" have now formally decided to abandon both the 2-state solution and the vestiges of their Oslo commitments. Israel should do the same, since there is now a regime in the W. Bank and Gaza with the same policy toward Israel as the pre-1967 regimes at war with Israel. Essential first steps: 1) cut off all supply from Israel of fuel, electricity, water and medical services to PA residents. 2) cut off all access of PA residents to Israel's shipping ports and transit system. 3) Cut off all permits to work in Israel, and Israeli shipping of PA products. 4) Ban all travel across Israel soil or Israeli airspace by PA residents, including VIPs. 5) seal the Philadelphi route and the Jordan bridges to PA traffic, a war is on. 6) Immediately annex the Gush Etzion, Maale Adumim (including E-1 corridor), Ariel blocs, as well as the entire 20km wide Jordan rift valley strip ("Allon Plan"), and northern strip of Gaza from which Kassams are fired at Sderot. Next move up to Hamastan.

    • 145. 0 0
      50 -Jews from Arab lands expelled without compensation
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:32

      Shmuel Trigano: Yes. There was an exchange of populations, as 600,000 Jews displaced from Arab countries immigrated to Israel, on the one hand, and on the other, 540,000 Palestinians displaced after the creation of Israel found themselves in several Arab countries. Those 600,000 Jews were stripped of all their belongings. They too lived in ?transit camps.? We have a battle to fight on an international level, because this chapter of the history of the Jews from Arab lands has been completely hidden. http://christianactionforisrael.org/isreport/june02/forgotten.html

    • 144. 0 0
      #125 Nice Picture
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:32

      Did you ever use mirror?

    • 143. 0 0
      # 123 Please read my posts.
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:30

      I actually didn't write #4

    • 142. 0 0
      #50
      • Alex
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:18

      Jews leaving voluntarily after the Roman-Jewish wars? i think you need to re-examine the history books. its called an EXILE for a reason.

    • 141. 0 0
      Indeed, the PA's platform flies in the face of international ....
      • Nadav
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:17

      ... demands and norms of international relations!!! How can a political entity expect to be treated seriously when it states clearly that it would not accept signed, note, signed agreements, unless they deem those agreements in their interest? How can a political entity expect to be treated seriously when its respresentation at the UN, in the status of an observer, would call for the annihilation of a member state of the UN in good standing? How can a political entity expect to be treated seriously when its very government is hebind the political and military activities of terror gangs operating in its name? Neither Israel, nor Europe and North America should interact with this Hamas entity and its government if they want to be viewed with any degree of respect, none!!!!!

    • 140. 0 0
      Hamas won
      • Jason
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:16

    • 139. 0 0
      Joe 108 -- You cause your own misery. Enjoy it!
      • DavidAK
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:14

      Dear Joe, all the miseries you say you have endured are the result of your own refusal to recognize another people's right to exist in their own homeland, something even the UN recognized many years ago. Of course you don't like occupation, but you don't wish to find a reasonable way to end it. When the Arabs want peace, instead of some sort of total victory that will restore their fanatical religious fantasies and their sickly bloated sense of "honor," then maybe they will be able to have it. Until then, you give Israel no choice. So enjoy your misery. But stop complaining!

    • 138. 0 0
      Talk, walk, and laughing stock
      • Yamin'
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:11

      You can't talk back an arab.

    • 137. 0 0
      Israeli proposal #1 - part 1
      • Gil
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:06

      OK Chuck - I'll try. 1.) Israel should eliminate all but the largest settlements in the West Bank, withdraw fully to 1967 borders except in cases where settlements do not make this possible, and should provide additional land to make up for the settlements that have been left in place. In the end, the Palestinian territiory should be equal to or greater than was the case when Jordan and Egypt controlled the West Bank and Gaza. 2.) Jerusalem should be declared an international city, therefore not under either Palestinian or Israeli control.

    • 136. 0 0
      # 110 Steven Rosenfeld- get a clue from la la land
      • Joe
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:01

      "If we must have enemies, let us have stupid ones. Thank God for the Palestinians." Read your Jewish history, you don't have to go back to genesis to find enemies of the Jews, let's say 1930's, for starters, NO SHORTAGE OF ENEMIES then, stupid or otherwise. With attitude like yours, it's no wonder Jews make enemies like there is a 2 for 1 sale going on. You call us stupid for not submiting to Zionist demands but the stupid people are those WHO MAKE ENEMIES like they are god's chosen. Ooops, I'm sorry, I forgot, Jews are "God's chosen". Get a clue, it's Jews who thoroughout history find themselves in ONE CALAMITY after another, one progrom after another and I know, that's because they are geniuses at the "INTERNATIONAL ARENA". Maybe if you stopped long enough to look in the mirror, you will see who is really stupid in this equation. If you think history stopped with the creation of Israel, I'v got twin towers in New York to sell you.

    • 135. 0 0
      To all israelis uncompromised...
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 19:00

      ..12345 and 54321. No agreement, no peace. YOU are in arab land, you should follow arab rules.

    • 134. 0 0
      19# Clickfool and Maskiot
      • Nora
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:59

      How come that Clickfool knows about "Maskiot deep in the West Bank" maybe more than Sussex "The Clickfool-Land". Such perseverance in minute details makes one wonder as who is feeding information to our dear friend Clickfool.

    • 133. 0 0
      #108
      • Maurice
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:58

      "...the joke is on the criminal Zionists who are so deluded that they think any amount of hell inflicted on the natives will force them to give UP THEIR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS! " I ask you Joe who is the joke really on? On the Israelis who live in a prosperous, advanced, militarily strong and democratic country, or on the Palistinians who live of charity, in lawlessness, poverty, and with a culture of death? Until you accept the reality of Israel which, like it or not, is here to stay, the dream of a "normal" Palestinian country will never materialize.

    • 132. 0 0
      What is wrong with that
      • El-Birawi
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:56

      The Israelis and the world Jewish community are the only group in the world that sees nothing wrong with occupying people and stealing their land and are the only ones that deny the right to resist the occupatiopn, whether by arms or peaceful means. They simply want us to accept the Jewish occupation. As for the right of return, yes, it is a right that NO one can deny, not even Allah, God or G-d. And if the Jews from around the world have such a right, whey deny it to the people of the land. We are not Russian Palestinians or Ethopians or Bulgarian, or German Palestinians, we are simply from Palestine, and Palestine is not in Russia or Brooklyn. We always stated this is subject to negotiations, but will never accept its removal from the table. A wrong took place and this wrong has to be addressed. NO one is calling for the removal or the destruction of Israel, but let us agree that Israel does not extent beyond 67 borders. Otherwise, one state solution.

    • 131. 0 0
      What have Palestinians ever contributed to the world?
      • Gili
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:54

      At least the rest of the Arab world exports oil and carpets. What do Palestinians export? War, suicide bombings and racism. These people have been getting the most financial aid per capita than any other people on the face of the earth for over half a century and what have they accomplished?! Palestinians need to show they want peace with Israel by *action* not words. At the current rate they are going not only will they not get their own state but instead they will blow themselves up to death and no one will give a damn about them. No one *owes* Palestinians anything! They have to *earn* it.

    • 130. 0 0
      #86 zionist
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:52

      zionist forever lives...resistances lives, guaranteed.

    • 129. 0 0
      Palestinians demands are racist
      • Gili
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:47

      It is ironic that Palestinians repeatedly demand "right of return" to Israel in order to destroy it yet they absolutely refuse the right of any Jews to live in any future state. If an Arab sells land to a Jew he is executed. If a Jew lives on a land he bought from an Arab he is labeled a "settler" and "occupier" and told he is living on that land illegally. It is utterly racist for Palestinians to demand a Jew-free country while at the same time demanding equal rights to Arabs living in Israel. Either allow millions of Jews to live with equal rights in a future Palestinian state or drop your racist demands.

    • 128. 0 0
      Well said Dino, just because sides disagree does not
      • Adam
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:39

      have to equate to violence. Make love not war

    • 127. 0 0
      Dumb KUTW, jihad is not in our agenda
      • fatah supporter
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:38

      Dont try to corrupt the subject!! No right of return, resistent-terror-jihad-or whatever u named it, will continue.

    • 126. 0 0
      Expected Union.
      • Vital
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:33

      It is nothing new in this Hamas -PA Union. So called Pal Arabs never will accept Israel and they will continue fight against Israel. Withdrawal from Gaza did not change their direction to fight. IDF must retake all former Jewish villages in Gaza, rebuild them and make a border with Egypt stronger, do it until not too late.

    • 125. 0 0
      haniyeh looks like a monkey
      • Nice Picture
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:31

    • 124. 0 0
      #3 Sameer
      • Jax
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:31

      No people in the history of the world have ever ended occupation by peaceful means. This is because it is possible to negotiate fairly when one party has the upper hand militarily because then they have no incentive to compromise. The only incentive the israelis have to end the occupation is the prospect of peace. Take away the violence and all of a sudden the status quo would not seem so bad for israelis. They would be happy live in security while systematically annexing the most desirable parts of palestinian land.

    • 123. 0 0
      Lynn, I think you mean a Palestinian declaration of war
      • Jake
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:29

      What does Israel have to do with this agreement between Hamas and Fatah

    • 122. 0 0
      #65 Hani: Your "right" to land you stole
      • Yacov
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:29

      Hani: Rami steals your car. Rami sells your car to Abdul. Abdul sells your car to Mahmoud. Rami or Abdul then have the "right of return" by stealing your car back from Mahmoud? No. The car still belongs to you. No one has the "right of return" to that car except you. The car was originally your car no matter how many times other Arab Muslims stole and traded it. That is KORAN!!! Arab Muslims invaded, stole and occupied Jewish homeland. You have no "right of return" to Jewish land which you stole in the first place, no matter how many times you deal, steal, resell, trade or give it to other Arab Muslims. That is your own KORAN!!! Live by your Koran, return to your own homelands on the Arabian peninsula and your own capital of Mecca.Only Jews have the "right of return" to our homelands which you invaded and stole from us.

    • 121. 0 0
      Right of Return
      • Edifice
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:27

      The sole purpose of the arabs, the jihadists and the muslims is to make the middle east free of Jews, Christians and kufars(non believers). If they ever achieve that goal, G-d forbid, the next step is making the rest of the world subservient to Islam.

    • 120. 0 0
      A Question for Palestinian on Palestinian Rights
      • Gil
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:26

      OK - right of return, 67 borders, recognizing Israel, and ending terrorism are bargaining chips. Which, if any of these can be compromised, and what must Israel offer in return? I fail to see any compromise on the part of the Palestinian leadership - the same demands that are made today are the same as those made for many years. It seems more the case that the Palestinian position is to demand everything in return for nothing more than the possibility that they will not continue to attack Israel. Both sides must work together, and so far neither seem to be interested. Israel has few bargaining chips as well, so what must both sides do to create a lasting peace?

    • 119. 0 0
      #21, johnnyboy
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:26

      No sovereign country is obligated to allow any person to enter its territory unless the person has a legal right to be there according to the laws of the country. Immigration policy is one of the fundamental rights that attach to sovereignty. Palestinian refugees and their descendents are not Israeli citizens. Israel has never extended any sovereignty over them, nor does she wish to.

    • 118. 0 0
      #77 - Right of Return
      • Double Click
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:25

      #77 is absolutely correct that a million Jews living in Arab countries for thousands of years were forced to leave their countries [in 1948]. But let's not forget the thousands of Sabra Jews who left Israel for the United States because of the invasion of Ashkenazi Jews who had totally different cultural and moral values.

    • 117. 0 0
      Nothing Conciliatory
      • Avi Yerushalmi
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:21

      I just read excerpts of the platform of the unity government and on the Jerusalem Post website and I see nothing conciliatory. An example is the following: "the government confirms that the key to security and stability in the regionis the ending of the Israeli occupation of Palwstinian land,recognition of the right of palestinian self determination and the government will work with the intentional community to end the occupation and to rdeturn the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people." Not one word about a two state solution. Not one word about Jewish national rights in the country. This is coupled with the right of resisistance and the right of return to the places in Israel from which the refugees left. the facy that we set up the Palestinian authority and evacuated the major cities in Central Palestine plus Gaza shows our recognition of Palestinian self determination. Israel cannot countenance such attitudes and maybe we should go back to a more hardline approach.

    • 116. 0 0
      Another miss.
      • H.H.M
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:19

      Palestinian representative deed the utmost to prove again that they are specialist and making the maximum of a wrong answer whenever there is a slightest chance for it. The newly created ?new Palestinian unity government? maybe a step in the direction of ?a way from civil war and this something but that seems to be all.?

    • 115. 0 0
      Hamas leaders puts on a fancy suit
      • Isac
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:19

      a winning smile and presents some nice leather bound document folders. For the Europeans that is enough to say: yeah let's deal with them they look like a bunch of respectable business people/politicians. Everything is all right now! Yeah. A leopard cannot change its spots. Hamas is and stays a terror organization and for Abbas: he is not much better. He just sounds better. For the international media. I say, Israel and U.S. do not fall in their traps. And to the Europeans: Forgetaboutit!!!!!!!

    • 114. 0 0
      Palestinians
      • Steven Rosenfeld
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:18

      Thank God for the Palestinians. Their stupidity makes the idea of a Palestinian State an impossibility. Nobody except the Palestinians and their continual misreading of Israel and the international community could have assured that. Their childish preocupation with machismo and false pride shows that they would do better in the kindergarten than in the international arena. They are children, plain and simple. If we must have enemies, let us have stupid ones. Thank God for the Palestinians.

    • 113. 0 0
      The big, fat red herring of the refugee problem - 2nd try
      • Tosefta
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:18

      Suppose the Saudis drop any mention of the refugees. Would Olmert agree to the `67 border? (Clue: The man thinks the "wall" should be the border.) And if the refugees are not mentioned, would they go away and not be treated? Indeed, the refugee problem is the EASIEST to solve, because the Arabs are fully aware that Israel cannot admit any significant number back. They use the refugee issue in order to gain concessions on the other issues: Territory and Jerusalem. The way the Saudi plan puts the refugee problem is not bad: "Achievement of a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem to be agreed upon in accordance with U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194." This is open to interpretation, otherwise the Saudis would have said: "Implementing Resolution 194". Indeed, the Geneva Initiative solves the refugee problem with the vast majority of refugees get settled elsewhere, with everybody calling it "fulfillment of Resolution 194". Historical note: In the process of its admission as member of the UN in 1949, Israel made a few commitments regarding compensation to refugees and, while accusing other Arab states of creating this problem, declared that it is "earnestly anxious to contribute to the solution of this problem", but in the context of a full peace agreement. The time to discuss it is now. If Israel refuses, it may be accused of receiving its UN membership thru fraud and have it taken away from it.

    • 112. 0 0
      WE surrender our right of return and claim to Palestine
      • Joe
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:17

      I know Zionists are disappointed they didn't get such rhetoric from their opressed and tormented captives. I know they are disappointed the new government platform didn't give the STAMP OF APPROVAL on Zionist MILITRAY occupation. I know they feel let down after killing thousands of Palestinians, injuring and imprisoning thousands more, and after all the economic sanctions and all the assassinations and all the hell with demolitions and incursions by the murdering and thieving IDF, the Palestinian captives still disappiont THEIR OCCUPIERS. Ahhhh, we are so sooorry Israeli WAR CRIMES failed to pay POLITICAL dividend. It breaks my heart to see all the Israeli evil efforts prove futile once again in breaking the heart, spirit and determination of the Palestinian people. Zionists were expecting a WHITE FLAG of sorts but the joke is on the criminal Zionists who are so deluded that they think any amount of hell inflicted on the natives will force them to give UP THEIR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS!

    • 111. 0 0
      #1 Kakalid
      • Bosshog
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:15

      The land of Israel is the core and soul of the jewish people with jerusalem as it's capital. As it has been since the city was built thousands of years ago. The day your little mind gets this undeniable fact your pal buddies might eventually become human beings and not the blood thristy dogs that they are with fantasies based on propaganda and lies

    • 110. 0 0
      Hamas sez: We respect past agreements up to
      • Paul Freedman
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:15

      up to the moment we try to bash in your skull. Thanks guys. About that right of return. We fully accept the right of mass national patriation of Palestinian refugees (and their extended families of course) except that we don't. And, the IDF pledges to uphold any and all truces with Palestinian entities, except when it doesn't. It's kinda fun when you get into it.

    • 109. 0 0
      Hani #65
      • Jane
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:14

      Your "right of return" (interesting that you people could never come up with an original phrase and so you co-opted ours) will never happen. You know we will never agree to it. Ever.

    • 108. 0 0
      3 - Paulo
      • zionist forever
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:10

      The palestians twist the law. Legaly Israel should allow a right of return for the INDIVIDUAL who left in 1948 not their millions of decendents. I have never heard of any refugee situation in the world like that how can a child born March 2007 have the same status as an adult who left Israel in 1948 the palestians have taken a law and changed it to support their cause. The territory the palestians claim as their state legaly dooesnt belong to them or Israel they are individuals who live in a certain area same Israel didnt legaly belong to the jews living there untill 1948. Right of resistance also does not include firing rockets into civilian towns on Israels side of the border or blowing themselves on busses. If they want to fight soilders in the streets of Gaza thats one thing but the hamas methods are terror not resistance If hamas crashed planes into a skyscraper in Tel Aviv would that be legitimate resistance or does resistance have limits on tactics that can be used?

    • 107. 0 0
      Khalid
      • Jane
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:10

      You have not heart nor soul, and you are rotten to the core. Jerusalem is ours, Mecca and Medina are yours.

    • 106. 0 0
      I Have A Solution
      • Yosemite
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:09

      Because we know that the Saudi Innitiative will ultimately fail, because of the meddling of people like Bashar Assad, Achmed Jibril, Ahmadinejad, Hassan Nasrallah, Al-Qaida, Indrajaya (Just Kidding), the ever present reality of some crazy Jew with a 22 or a Muslim with a SUV, box cutter, gun, or whatever, and the fact that the Bible clearly states that all attempts to mediate will collapse over the issue of Jerusalem; I will propose a proposition to cheat death and destiny. I propose that Israel go into negotiations with the Saudis without a specified time limit, and that these negotiations may be extended into perpetuity. An on going dialogue with slight adjustments made here and there in order to avoid the judgement that awaits us all, as long as possible. That's the best we can do, I fear!

    • 105. 0 0
      #72 - Optimism
      • Maurice
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:08

      Here's what I call see the galss as half full rather than half empty! I hope you are right...

    • 104. 0 0
      An Exercise TO ALL POSTERS
      • Chuck
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:02

      Here's a little test for everyone. Rather than shout out rhetoric, I'd like to see people try and simulate a negotiated settlement between two sides. It's really simple, just label your post subject: Palestinian proposal, or Israeli proposal, and then do re: Proposal #. Just to show how difficult (and how easy) it is to find peace. I place this challenge on all repeat posters here to show that you are not recycled broken records with mad libs post to tailor to the article, and I hope I won't be disappointed.

    • 103. 0 0
      Hani # 65
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:02

      There is a small problem with this. Since there is a Pal Gov now and that gives legitimacy to a Pal State, how can that State, when sovereign, demand another one takes its citizenry? If they are Pal refugees, they must, of course, live in their own State, not someone elses. The State they would have to return to is Palestine, not Israel. Good luck with supporting the 4 or 5 million you insist are Pal citizens. Hope they all find jobs and have great lives within the borders of Palestine. :)

    • 102. 0 0
      #69 - No Right of Return for Terrorists
      • Double Click
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:02

      Obviously, there would no 'right of return' for 'tried and convicted' terrorists. But let's not hold the entire Palestinian nation hostage due to the acts of the minority of youths who blow themselves up in the mistaken belief that they'll ascend to heaven. And let's not forget that these youths are third and fourth generation refugees.

    • 101. 0 0
      1. Khalid: soul and heart and core
      • KUTW
      • 15.03.07
      • 18:02

      and also jihadism is. Why dont they return to pal? Didn't they want their own state? They want to have their own state and others'.

    • 100. 0 0
      #50 Tupac: Returning Jews, Arab Muslim thieves l
      • Yacov
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:51

      Israel's Jews are returning to their original Jewish homelands of E. Jerusalem, Judea & Samaria which were stolen and occupied by invading Arab Muslim land thieves. The Arab homeland is on the Arabian peninsula and their capital is Mecca. Arabs trying to "return" to Israel are trying to "return" to Jewish homelands they stole from Jews and occupied. Israeli Jews have no problem with Arab Muslims "returning" to their rightful homelands on the Arabian peninsula and their capital of Mecca. We hope they return to the Arabian peninsula and wish them well. We do have a problem with Arab Muslims stealing our Jewish homelands and trying to "return" to our Jewish homelands which we have LIBERATED from Arab Muslim theft and occupation.

    • 99. 0 0
      National Unity Goverment Program
      • Harris
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:49

      See : http://www.miftah.org Exeerpts from the program of the 11th National Unity Government. It is an 8 point plan. 1, Political 2. The Occupation 3. Security 4. Legal 5. Palestinian Value Sysyem 6. Economic 7. Reform 8. International Relations Here is the the key: "The government pledges to protect the higher national interests of the Palestinian people and protect their rights: it pledges to preserve and further their accomplishments and work towards achieving their national goale as declared in the resolutions of the PNC, the Basic Law, the national conciliation document and the resoultions of the Arab summits. Based on this, the government shall respect international resoutions and agreements signed by the PLO." Now the government of Israel should agree to a similar statement. i.e. -government shall respect international resoutions and agreements signed by the government of Israel.

    • 98. 0 0
      no win situation and no solution to it
      • zionist forever
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:47

      Providing that idiot Olmert and his gang of idiots Peretz and Livni dont decide to sell out on the idea of no refugee right of return so they can go with the Saudi plan then there is no solution to the Israel/palestian conflcit. Even if Israel and the palestians agree on borders, settlements and Jerusalem unless Israel gives in on the right of return issue then there will be no deal and neither the palestians or the rest of the arab world are going to accept any solution that doesnt agree to a right of return for millions of palestians then there is not going to be any deal and in another 60 years we are going to still trying to solve this conflict.

    • 97. 0 0
      right of return
      • Naim S. Mahlab
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:46

      I marvel at the 'hutzbah' of the Palestinian leadership when they insist on the 'right of return'. At the most, some 300 thousand Palestinians were displaced by the creation of the State of Isael. on the other hand close to a million Jews were forced to leave their homes and possessions and leave the Arab world. Most of the Jewish refugees were resident in the area over one thousand years before the Moslem occupation of their homelands. Yet no one talks about them. To their credit, they did not sit in refugee camps, but succeeded in getting reestablished in their new homes.

    • 96. 0 0
      Moderation of Hamas; past, present, and future
      • Tosefta
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:45

      Hamas started its independent existence by moderating. It grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, an organization calling for universal Jihad which also gave rise to Ayman al-Zawahiri of al-Qaida. But instead of going the global way, Hamas decided to deal with its national problem. It wants to Islamicize the Palestinians and regain what it considers their national home. Israel may not like it, but this is still relative moderation. Once Hamas gained power (and responsibility) in the recent elections, and was put under international financial pressure, it moderated further. While in 1996 Hamas could blow up buses prior to the Israeli elections, thus bringing about the loss of Peres to Netanyahu and the undermining of the peace process, today Hamas is willing to let Abbas negotiate with Israel about the establishment of a Palestinian state and resolving the refugee problem. This is moderation in action. Hamas is not yet ready to recognize and have peace with Israel, but it has gone a long way. This is not the end of the road, though. Suppose Abbas and Israel produce a peace agreement which is approved by a national referendum. What will Hamas do, just live under a promised hudna, say for 10 years? Unlikely. With peace conditions, there will be less public appetite for war. Also, with the resolution of the refugee problem, there will be many fewer troops for Hamas. If they continue with their warlike attitude they will lose much of their political power. I imagine they will do what Begin did, the man who kept dreaming about the EAST Bank of the Jordan river. They will exercise further moderation and become a political party of Likud-like ideology. And in time, they will have their own ex-Hamas Kadimah party which will shed off the ideology completely. Our Father Darwin still lives.

    • 95. 0 0
      to No. 54
      • a wandering Jew
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:45

      It goes both ways!!

    • 94. 0 0
      1 - khalid
      • zionist forever
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:41

      I support for a right of return palestian refugee but only if its based on the original UN resolutions ( the legal position ) ... that means the refugees from 1948 not their millions of decendents. I am sure that even Israels most hard right wing would agree to a right of return to the orginal refugee and as the average refugee will be in their 70s and 80s so no real threat to Israels demographics. As for E.Jerusalem it wasnt capital of a palestian state before 1967 it was occupied by Jordan and it was not the capital of Jordan .. W.Jerusalem was the divided capital untill the East was liberated in 1967. Jews were the majority in east and west Jerusalem untill they were ethnicly cleansed by arabs .. the properties that arabs get so angry about being bought by jews were the homes of jews ethnicly cleansed from the city during the war. There is no automatic right to the palestians being given any part of Jerusalem to any future palestians state thats a matter for Israelis to decide.

    • 93. 0 0
      Hani # 65
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:38

      What would reaffirm that you are not subhuman (who said that anyway?) is if your start getting your act together like inteeligent human beings and start recognizing what is feasible and what is not. Just becasue there is no right of return does not make you any less human. It is your behaviour that is removing you from the family of man and society that usually aims for betterment and not stagnation, which is exactly what your leaders are doing - creating stagnation and moves towards the past instead of towards the future.

    • 92. 0 0
      NOTHING HAS CHANGED, NOTHING
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:37

      Hamas and the marvel PA unity government have not changed their stance one bit. They still will not recognize Israel, they still will not end terror, they still will not accept and honor previous agreement, and they still insist on the right of return of "refugees." The Hamas Covenant is still the ruling document, and as I had said, the Mecca agreement was simply one that had for purpose the prevention of a civil war, and nothing more. From the point of view of Israel, nothing has changed. Hamas and the other terror groups are still arming themselves, still tunneling, still getting training, funds and arms from Iran.

    • 91. 0 0
      Congratulations to the new Hamas government
      • Tosefta
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:36

      "[Haniyeh says he] has received signals that the Europeans are ready to work with his new government, but acknowledged that winning U.S. and Israeli support would be difficult." - Haaretz Israel of course will be the last to see the coming future, and its benefits. The Europeans have already agreed that the new government should accept the Quartet's preconditions "by actions", not necessarily by an explicit declaration. The Quartet (including US) expects that the government platform will "reflect" the preconditions. The new government will abide by a ceasefire while allowing Abbas to negotiate with Israel. Then, we he comes back with a peace agreement, it will be put to a referendum. Good enough for me, but not for the blind mice Olmert/Livni. They would rather wait for a declaration. In the meantime, even with a cease fire, Gaza is getting filled up with smuggled weapons. Wasting time is not a good thing for Israel. P.S. The "right of resistance" to Occupation is a natural right. As long as Hamas wants to allow negotiations with Israel while maintaining a hudna, we can all uphold that right.

    • 90. 0 0
      Johnboy has the rules wrong .48 established
      • Steve
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:36

      Israel. Right of return,unfortunatley you cant ask the dead Jews who returned to Eastern Europe after WW2. The Arabs ran as fast as their feet would carry them in 48, with the understanding that their 7 armies could defeat the Haganah, the basis of which was the Jewish Brigade who fought with the Brits, Aussies etc in Africa and Europe. As an Australian you should know and appreciate it. The Grand Mufti and other Arab leaders spent WW2 in Berlin spewing Nazi hate. As for the Palis their plans went arwy in the Jews beat their 7 armies and they wouldnt come back to a Jewish state recognized by the intl community.They tried Jordan but thieves that they are Hussein had to drive them out and they cant go back there either. We are special we pull off miracles and survive for 5000 years.

    • 89. 0 0
      SHIMON #69 Skunk has a White Strip
      • Tim
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:32

      and always will. Terrorists don't change their color they are pure evil just as a skunk is pure stink!! Terrorists only switch their methods, names, & headrags sometime for suits.

    • 88. 0 0
      Abbas and Haniyeh, street thugs laughing at Isra
      • Dov
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:31

      With Mr. Yossi Beilin 's blessing. Can't wait to hear Israeli governement response.

    • 87. 0 0
      Paulo, Hana, Khalid, and others...
      • Eric
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:31

      It is sad that you are encouraging the support of irrealistic ideas such as the so called right of return that will never lead the Palestinians to a country of their own. With ideas like that Palestinians are condemned to live in poverty and on charity for ever! Wake up: Israel is a strong, powerful, advanced country that is here to stay. No matter what you say and do!

    • 86. 0 0
      Turn Tel-Aviv to Bagdad to have a peace!
      • Just Cause
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:28

      Less than 200 suiside bombers were responsible for carnage of 2002-2003 and now Pals wanted than millions arabs were exepted by Israel! Israel already exepted same amount of Jews Regugees from Arabs contries, who were kick out by Arabs in 1948-1953 and shall not fill obligatedin any way. The slogan of arab Refugees:"First we return and that we kick Jews to the sea" still valid.

    • 85. 0 0
      # 55 DR
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:23

      It isn't my post, but I don't mind answering you. I absolutely agree with your statements. I spend a lot of time pointing out how foolish the Pal Gov. truly is. The "right of return" demanded by the Pals is an overbearing assumption they have the right to tell another sovereign country it must take the Arabs into their country, ie Israel. Any right of return by Arabs should be to their own country, Palestine.

    • 84. 0 0
      government backs resistance...
      • Shmuelshachor
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:22

      The "palestinians" will never change in their dream of sending the Jews into the sea...Let's send them over the River,to the East Bank...They want no 2 States solution,no peace,no living side by side...What they want and realy need,is to go to hell!!!!!!!

    • 83. 0 0
      Gov't backs 'resistance' to occupation, right of return
      • David
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:22

      Poster 1 - Khaled. The so-called "Right of Return" is an Arab myth as is your so-called claim on the eternal Jewish capital of Jerusalem. You people have nothing to do except cause problems, wage war, and wreck havoc anc terror. Grow up you bunch of crybaby's and losers. Build industry, create jobs, allow pluralism, build democratic institutions. Your lies are only superceded by your collective stupidity, perfidy, and ignorance.

    • 82. 0 0
      No mention of peace?
      • ChanahS
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:22

    • 81. 0 0
      Unity Government
      • P. J. Casey
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:16

      You never know what you can achieve unless you negotitate without preconditions. Talk, work, and engage!

    • 80. 0 0
      #65 hani YOUR ANCESTRAL LAND IS A SAUDI ARABIA .
      • paul harris
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:11

      LOOK IT UP AND WITH ALL THAT OIL WHY ARGUE !!

    • 79. 0 0
      My way or the highway
      • Avrum
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:10

      is the expression used to tell your opponent that there is no negotiation. This has been the Palestinian way from the start. I am 58 yrs old. Born in 1948- year of the glorious independence of the STATE OF ISRAEL. Sorrowfully for me I do not think i will see peace in the Middle East during my lifetime. Not with idiots like these Palestinian leaders. Each and every one of them.

    • 78. 0 0
      #50 TUPAC AND HISTORY ARE TOTAL STRANGERS .
      • paul harris
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:09

      START YOUR HISTORY LESSONS AT THE ROMAN OCCUPATION OF ISRAEL AD 70 THEN SEPND AT LEAST AYEAR ON JEWISH MIGRATIONS AND THE REASONS FOR THEM

    • 77. 0 0
      #66 - Jewish 'Right of Return'
      • Double Click
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:09

      #66 questions, "What about all the Jews from Arab countries how were kicked out and their property were taken by the Arab governments in 1948?" That's a 'no brainer': Jews who were kicked out of Arab governments also have a 'right of return'. The 'Right of Return' also implies a 'just compensation' for those do not choose to return.

    • 76. 0 0
      #1 WRONG KHALID ITS AMMAN !! THERE IS ROOM FOR ALL TO RETURN
      • paul harris
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:04

      THAT IS IF THEY WANT TO ???

    • 75. 0 0
      Great photo with this story
      • Chick Corea
      • 15.03.07
      • 17:03

      I can hear Haniyeh slobbering to Abbas 'This guarantees us the money, right, right?' and Abbas answering 'Damn right it will. Next month you even Suha will be jealous' Party over at Abbas' with non-alcoholic drinks for all and with no limit to celebratory gun firing as the bullets will soon be plentiful.

    • 74. 0 0
      to Jazzi
      • TAZ
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:55

      well said Jazzi Paulo needs to look at the history of his own anti-semitic and utterly WEAK country

    • 73. 0 0
      palesitnain terrorists deserve NO rights until they change
      • SHIMON
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:54

      First they change, then peace comesz

    • 72. 0 0
      My resistance
      • From the Moon
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:49

      Resistance is when you gain trust of one Jew or non-Muslim. Resistance is when you go to sleep and know nobody cry because of you. Resistance is to be good when all crash around you and your heart is broken glass which nothing can repear- neither apologizes nor money. Resistance is free the Brit even all shake in stomach of them. Resistance is to be kind even you watch mother with stroke which shakes when it is your turn to see prison. Resistance is to learn even from mistakes and never repeat them. Do not do what all expect: violence.

    • 71. 0 0
      No Problem - Haaretz Thinlks This is a Peace Platform
      • Tod Zuckerman
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:44

      Yes, by all means, Olmert do as the brilliant Haaretz columnists suggest - make deals with Hamas. You have "nothing to lose" - except the future of the Jewish state, but who cares about that. The important thing is to stay in office , so world Jewry can admire your intelligence and courage. You are a great role model, as is your wondeful family, who have also contributed mightily to Israel's well-being.

    • 70. 0 0
      Where does it mention comp for jews kicked out of arab countries?
      • SHIMON
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:43

      One would think, that it would be fair that if you are going to make some historically innnacurate claim that arabs need to "return" to israel despite never having a country their at any point in history, that israel should be paid billions for arab countries ACTUALLY kicking them out and killing them. Why isnt that mentioned??

    • 69. 0 0
      Yaakov Sullivan...care to show me how this is a peaceful gesture?
      • SHIMON
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:41

      HOW is this a peaceful gesture? How is it peaceful to basically say "we want u to make peace with us...but peace means we will kill you until you let us flood your country with our terrorists"?!!?

    • 68. 0 0
      crazy arab demands prove they dont want peace
      • SHIMON
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:39

      If they wanted peace, they would make peace....not demands and threats of violence. Thats not how peace works. The right to return, aside from it being completely counter actual historical events of them LEAVING ON THEIR OWN, is in no way EVER going to happen. You can have your own country if u make peace, you CANNOT have your own country and then move everyone OUT of that country to destroy another one. That isnt peace and people arent stupid enough to give in to that.

    • 67. 0 0
      #26 - Paulo and the Right of Return
      • Maurice
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:37

      " "It demands the return of Palestinian Arab `refugees`" - The UN and the international community are also demanding this. " It is not true that the international community supports this! Your are making up things to mislead people. The US, Canada and Australia have clearly stated that they are against this. The EU has not been very clear but never clearly supported the so called right of return. Anyway, as historically documented most of the Arabs who left in 1948 were either scared and fled of their own will, or were told to do so by the Arab governments who wanted an Arab free terrain to be able to kill all the Jews. If Israel wanted to get rid of the Arabs there would not be today in Israel over 1.5 million Arabs living with full rights. This clearly shows that those who wanted to stay in 1948 were allowed to stay and become Israelis. So, Paulo, please read the history or change your prejudiced mind before you come and spill here your anti-semitic lies!

    • 66. 0 0
      right of return
      • Eynav Benjamin
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:35

      What about all the Jews from Arab countries how were kicked out and their property were taken by the Arab governments in 1948

    • 65. 0 0
      #1 I second that Khalid
      • Hani
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:24

      Right of return reaffirms we Palestinians are not subhuman, and are entitled to return to our ancestral land. Any argument against this is universally rejected by Palestinians and Arabs on basis of UN resolutions and recent confirmation that it backs UNSCR194.

    • 64. 0 0
      hataf and Samah.
      • David Nigel Braham
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:24

      These backward looking groups can keep there stupid agreements to themselves.We are not playing games here,at risk are the lives of Millions of Israelis and Palestinians. As far as the right of return is concerned,they are right,Israel has already retaken what is rightly hers.The right of return means,never leaving,and never giving in to terrorism.

    • 63. 0 0
      #46 re: Bargaining Chips
      • Double Click
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:23

      Post #46 is correct in saying, "Right of return, 67 borders, accepting Israel and the "resistance" are pargaining chips in the Palestinian hand". However, the insidious Israeli government knows that continued stalling and repression will only bring about additional suicide bombings, Qussams, and of course . . . increased anti-Semitism. The Israeli government is no better than the misguided suicide bombers.

    • 62. 0 0
    • 61. 0 0
      EU trying to displace US,protecting themselves..US is only honest
      • r
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:14

      broker in this region. Historically US a good friend of all Arab govts!!!!

    • 60. 0 0
      Hamas is stupid!
      • Steven
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:12

      They've just gauranteed that there will never be a Palestinian state, not that I'm bothered. The "right of return" is not up for negotiation, the sooner they pull their heads out of the sand and realize that the better. Jerusalem is also not up for negotiation. Everything else is. And if Hamas doesn't like it then the Palestinian people can continue to suffer for all I care. Here's one who won't be sending them any money!! Nice picture by the way, a big gorilla of a terrorist shaking hands with Mahmoud Abbas.

    • 59. 0 0
      wrong of return
      • shai
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:09

      How long is this nonsense of a Right of Return to go on?? Return to where? the tribal wasteland that used to be Ottoman/British occupied Palestine? Or to the modern developed society of what Israel is today... I wonder if there is a return will all recepients have to pay some sort of premium for sewer systems, educational facilities, access to health care, modern toll highways all of which would never have existed during their previous occupations... In the course of history no people ever returned to a country that didnt exist before they left. Dream on, Better wait for the check and watch the next episode of Doogmaniot.....

    • 58. 0 0
      STATE LAND? WHICH STATE?
      • Futura
      • 15.03.07
      • 16:01

      How can occupied land be Israeli state land in West Bank????? IF SO, why isn't the palestinians living in West Bank Israeli citizens? Israel has to choose. Endd this catch 22!

    • 57. 0 0
      to 27, where is the money?
      • Marcelo
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:53

      The money went to Paulo and Click the fool to support the anti-jew/anti-Israel talk of arabs. Btw, Portugal was not part of Spain some time ago? I think it should be reasonable to allow the spanish people to return to Portugal as a "right of return"

    • 56. 0 0
      nice to see
      • Shiny_Orb
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:51

      To whom it concerns: Nice to see an agreement between the sides on the Palestinian unity government. Good quote below! Regards Lance Quote-------------------------------- Another Abbas aide, Nimr Hamad, said the new government represents all Palestinians. ``When Israel says it doesn't want to deal with it, it means it does not want to deal with the Palestinians,'' he said. --------------------------------------

    • 55. 0 0
      #4 Lynn
      • DR
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:49

      Israel digess non-jewish land? Are you serious? it is a tiny splinter in the region, but this is too much for people like you, isn't it/ Why don't you point fingers at the Palestinians who reject peace at every turn? Your bias and transparency only prove you wrong. Palestinians need to change their violent ways before Israel can have normal realtions with them. How do you deal with terrorists who want to kill you? You don't!!!

    • 54. 0 0
      Palestinian rights
      • Palestinian
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:41

      Right of return, 67 borders, accepting Israel and the "resistance" are pargaining chips in the Palestinian hand. Some of them can not be compromised under any circumstances, while some others can be compromised depending on what Israel offers in return.

    • 53. 0 0
      A slight dilemma for Hamas
      • a wandering Jew
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:39

      Hamas' position relative to "backing resistance" against Israel seems to contradict item 11 of the UN's General Assembly Resolution 194 which seems to be the basis of the Palestinians' "Right of Return." It seems difficult to support a violent resistance movement and to "live in peace" at the same time. "11. Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible;"

    • 52. 0 0
      Swiss Dino
      • Danite
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:15

      It has been obvious to me and many others that all this talk about "Hamas is moderating" is total nonsense.It is simply a show of tactical flexibility for the purpose of organisational survival.Hamas needs to get the money flowing and not be seen as an impediment to that.They do the minimum flexibility needed to get their cake and eat it too.For Hamas the war with israel is secondary to their true goal.The war with israel serves as vehicle for their internal power whos goal is to create an Islamic republic of Palestine.Conquering Israel is a lie the leadership tells their supporters.They know it cant happen, but as I said it serves the the primary internal goals of the leadership of hamas.Hamas is an ideological islamic group first and a Palestnian nationalist movement second.

    • 51. 0 0
      # 1 Khalid
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:13

      Your State, Palestine, and your Gov. can't make that demand of another State, Israel, and their Gov. The only place the Arabs can return to is their State, Palestine. Refugees return to their own country, not someone elses. How stupid can you be?

    • 50. 0 0
      8 Jairo: Right of Return for Jews why not Arabs
      • Tupac
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:12

      "how can the core of a national movement be the migration of would be new citizens to a foreign nation instead of their own?" Great point how but you can also argue about the Jews migrating back from Europe and Russia after volunteering leaving some 2000 years ago.

    • 49. 0 0
      Why don't you, Paulo, state clearly that the Jews
      • Marina
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:11

      have the right to their own state, Israel?

    • 48. 0 0
      # 8 Jairo from Colombia
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:10

      that has been my contention all along. If the Arabs want to insist on that "right of return", they should return to their own country and not someone elses. It just doesn't make sense. It would be the same thing if the US told the UK they had to accept all the descendents of the British as a right of return to that country and to the original property their ancestors held. What a crock, eh?

    • 47. 0 0
      re: Jasmine
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:03

      "You cant return to somewhere you've never been to before" - So those Afghani refugees that were born in Pakistan because of the barbarity of Taliban also have no right to return to a land that is synonomous with the identity? This is a right, an international standard, determined to all people. Jasmine need I also remind you that a significant proportion of Israel's population were not even born in the state of Israel. Using your very same argument please explain why this is the exception? But please dont tell me about some fantastical story about some old man parting the sea to the 'promised land', Im not 6 yrs old.

    • 46. 0 0
      Isn't that just great
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 15:01

      They know the choices they are making will keep the conflict going. Hamas is using the "right of return" to make war on its neighbor. According to the past agreements, this whole "right of return" is off the table. It isn't going to happen. The Arab League knows this as well. It's just their wayof trying to relieve themselves of making the Arabs in their own countries full citizens. No wonder though, they have done nothing but cause trouble for those govs. But, they sure can't be foisted on the Israelis. If the Pal gov wants the refugees back, they should return to Palestine and let the Pal gov deal with it. I'm sure they will find jobs for all of them.

    • 45. 0 0
      MORE DOUBLE TALK
      • Ian
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:58

      Hamas is the expert on saying precisely nothing useful.It seems to just be a continuation of the old policy of squeeze their own people for word sympathy,and then if they wait long enough,maybe,just maybe,the west will give them everything they demand on a plate.But Israel must beware.With flaky,cynical governments like there are in western Europe,especially the UK and France,Hamas is not so far wrong.

    • 44. 0 0
      #13 Arab - Something might consider
      • Elihu
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:53

      Sir, What you have failed to consider is that the Jews who are now returning to Israel from other lands had parents, grandparents, etc. who came from Israel. If Palestinians want to claim historical ties to the land, they must at least respect the claims of Jews, whose parents, grandfathers, etc. going back for literally thousnads of years, lived in Israel before they were exiled. Some Arabs may wish to claim - despite all historical fact and even evidnece form their own scriptures- that the Jews have no history in Israel. But, they are wrong. Jewish historical claims to the Holy Land go back much further than Arab ones and certainly longer than Palestinian ones. That does not mean that Palestinian individuals have not suffered - They have. Mutual respect might offer some hope.

    • 43. 0 0
      re: XYZ #33
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:53

      "Apparently there have been omissions in the history textbooks you're reading in Portugal" - Well "apparently" you're an idiot, do not presume to tell me how I have been educated. "If you were only familiar with the situation from 2006 on" - The seeds to this conflict were first sown in 1897, you're stupid if you think that the only thing that matters is post-2006. "Post something more intelligent and informed" - Well if my arguments are so stupid then why dont you argue against them. If my opinions are so ill-informed then please I invite you personally to challenge them rather than engage in an innate argument about my elementary education in Lisboa.

    • 42. 0 0
      # 23 Swiss
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:49

      I'm sure you do realize the "right of return" is just not going to happen. Unless, of course, the original Arabs are the only ones allowed to return. Israel will never let 4 or 5 million people flood their towns and cities. Doesn't matter if they are Arab or Ethiopian or even purple with orange polka dots. It just is not feasible economically. The Swiss would never allow it nor would any other small country. That is part of the problem in the EU now. Floods of immigrants and no jobs. The states can't support that at all.

    • 41. 0 0
      What is Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-mas saying now is:
      • Hastaroth
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:47

      "We will accept previous agreements but we will not implement them" "We will stop harming unarmed civilians but we will consider that all Israelis are potentially armed civilians (and perhaps that all Jews are potential immigrants to Israel and hence potentially armed civilians),so we can attack them". "We will recognize that Israel exists-because we could not annihilate something that doesn't exist".

    • 40. 0 0
      # 4 Lynn from Lynn
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:43

      I have rarely encountered someone with the same name as mine, spelled the same as mine. Which country do you hailfrom? I'm in the US. Just wanted to drop a line and greet you personally. Of course, your heading may be construed as a huge Hawkish problem. Not good.

    • 39. 0 0
      New Version of the Same Tired Old Song...
      • David ben Avraham
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:39

      The "Palestinians" still hold irrational hopes of eliminating Israel with the facetious "right of return" to a land that was never theirs to begin with. They talk out of both sides of their mouths with "respect for agreements" and "right of resistance" in the same breath. Israel, the next time these SOB's mess with you in a serious way, make sure that you make a repeat offense absolutely impossible... Stop toying with them and hit them like they've never been hit before.

    • 38. 0 0
      To Dina: Why bother?
      • Jazzi
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:31

      "Paulo. I will, therefore, give Paulo a chance, one more time, to simply say: yes or no. Does, Paulo, the Jewish state of Israel have the right to exist?" ============================================ Who gives a damn what Paulo thinks or the rest of the world against the Jews & their state anyway. They will not be happy until they have you marching to the ovens once again, BUT this time the scenario is a little more clever although it's the same concept: take what the Jews have worked for, leave them homeless/stateless, and march them to their death like sheeps. The answer to Paulo and the rest of his kind is only this: it's ours cause it is our homeland, and if you don't like it, well that's too bad... go find another country to bully or get yourself another weaker enemy cause were here to stay like it or not!

    • 37. 0 0
      Abbas Chokes the Chicken
      • SES
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:29

      The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity and once again they have choked the chicken that is, failed miserably at advancing their cause. For those of us who had high hopes for Mr. Abbas all we now see is the titular head of a movement who got out manuvered and marginalized. Fatah has lost its leadership position to Hamas who was able to leverage the support of other radicals like Iran and Syria to dominate the new government. This accomplished nothing other that to keep everyone polarized. The Europeans will do their typical, we are open minded and will probably throw the new government a bone, but the international tide is turning. Israel is being considered for NATO, every day the EU demands that Hamas recognize Israel, the Russians are realizing that helping the Iranians and other radicals may not be best for business and Lebanon is still boiling. So let the unity gov't take office,it will end up accomplishing nothing for the creation of a Palestinian State.

    • 36. 0 0
      Right of Return of Palestinians not feasible
      • Dona
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:23

      If the right of return for Palsestinians would ever be implimented then Israel would cease to exist. There can be a Palestinian State alongside Israel but to ask Israel to allow it's State (not the future Palestinian State) to be flooded by Palestinians would simply be suicide. And Unfair. This is a stone that will never be resolved and will likely cause war.

    • 35. 0 0
      Keep up the expansion until they meet the Quartet
      • The Equalizer
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:23

      Keep building Maskiot, keep the wall and keep vigilant.......if they meet the Quartet's provisions then and only then will there be negotiation. Period. Oh yeah, If a rocket lands after today, send fliers out that say the electricity will be turned off and a 2000 lb bomb drops on Gaza. Let them know it is an act of war.

    • 34. 0 0
      So, Arabs continue the war that they started in 1948. Sorry, but
      • Vittorio
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:13

      .....it is again their choice.

    • 33. 0 0
      to 14 Paulo
      • xyz
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:08

      Apparently there have been omissions in the history textbooks you're reading in Portugal. Your statement about Israel not holding up its end of the bargain would be true, if you were only familiar with the situation from 2006 on. However, lots happened between 1967 and today -- wars, Arafat, terrorism, Oslo...Israel agreed to plenty during that time, and the Palestinian leaders (not acting in the best interests of the Palestinian people) did not. How about you go do some reading, then come back and post something more intelligent and informed? Sound fair?

    • 32. 0 0
      Several posters here have difficulties with Israel's
      • Dina Yakir
      • 15.03.07
      • 14:06

      policies toward the Palestinians. However, few question Israel's right to exist. One poster here, however, persists to tell us Jews what to do and how to handle our affairs, while not even recognizing our right to have our own state, Israel. Paulo. I will, therefore, give Paulo a chance, one more time, to simply say: yes or no. Does, Paulo, the Jewish state of Israel have the right to exist?

    • 31. 0 0
      Paulo the one who still does not accept Israel's
      • Anat
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:57

      right to exist!!! Have you, Paulo, changed your mind, and do you recognize Israel's right to exist, in contrast to your previous statements?

    • 30. 0 0
      RESPECT not honour.All Israel is occupation to be" resisted"
      • PETER SM
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:48

      who are the Jihadists party fooling. Jihadists as in their charter which is alive and well

    • 29. 0 0
      The Palestinians need better leadership
      • David
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:48

      Once again the mighty PA 'leadership' has come up with a platform that will promise no betterment for their people. The Right-of-Return will never happen. Have the Arab countries that Jews were expelled from in '48 and '67 invited them back or have had their properties returned to them or been compensated? Of course not. Let the PA make a Garden of Eden out of Gaza with the BILLIONS of dollars and euros that have been given to them over the last 5 years. Ooops, I forgot. Their LEADERS squandered all that money on weapons to prolong the fighting and luxuries for themselves. No gleaming hospitals and universities, no wonderful school system and highways, just filth and dispair and hunger, while their LEADERS drive around in Mercedes and BMWs, live like princes in palatial homes, and send their kids to private schools in Europe. No PA leader has ever been truly concerned with the welfare of their people- just with how history will view them. Sadly, the view is depressing.

    • 28. 0 0
      Thank God - A Blessing
      • Robert
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:46

      This announcement gaurantees that the Islamofascists will not prevail in their attempt to conquer Israel. Building a platform on the right of return (read that as end of jewish state) and continued resistance (read that as terror) will go absolutely nowhere. While all the pretense of diplomacy may surround this unity government (read that as accommodation with terrorists), the peace process is has been set back 30 years or more. Nice work PALs.

    • 27. 0 0
      Hamas is insane
      • Eli Norris
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:42

      If hamas don't accept israels right to exist, and if they don't distance themselves form terrorism and they don't accept all previous accords, they will be isolated and never be recognized. And they won't get any money from EU. But they rather go blaiming israel that they were so poor. Where is all the money they received from arab nations and private donors???????? right, they bought weapons!!! all they understand is war, unfortunately!

    • 26. 0 0
      re: Nadav #14
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:39

      "The new Hamas government" - There is no new Hamas government, this is a governing coalition. "It is not committed to previously signed agreements" - Neither is Israel, the new PA has actually done more than Israel by stating that it actually "respect" these. "It does not accept the end of terror" - Hamas have said that it will no longer target unarmed civilians. "It calls for continuing the resistance" - So what? The Geneva Conventions gives Hamas the very right to resist an occupying force. "It demands the return of Palestinian Arab 'refugees'" - The UN and the international community are also demanding this. Nadav the way I see it is Israel could either consolidate its borders now along the 1967 green line or can continue with its paranoia over its right to exist.

    • 25. 0 0
      Return?
      • Jasmine Murphy
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:37

      You can't return to somewhere you've never been to before

    • 24. 0 0
      obnoxious arabs
      • lee
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:35

      its to bad israel is surrounded by such obnoxious neighbors. When you had the chance in the early war you should have removed them all across the jordan.

    • 23. 0 0
      Support "resistance"......
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:34

      Yes, that's fine Hanijeh and Abbas. But "flowers" please, this time, no rockets and no bombers. It costs a lot less blood and is even much cheaper. And it's the only thing that will make your people succeed.

    • 22. 0 0
      #15 - what eternal misery ?
      • redmike
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:31

      I and most Israelis are not suffering and not living in misery. We are happy with our lives (not with some of our so called leaders at the moment:-) and if Palestinians wish to continue their threats and rejection then so be it. The Palestinians do us very little harm (road deaths are of far greater concern here) and we could shut them down tomorrow (water and electricity) if we needed to. I feel very sorry for the Palestinians that want to build a better future but are held back by people that dream of 'liberating' something which was mostly never theirs. Seemingly due to childhood indoctrination the Palestinian society is one filled with blood lust and thoughts of death and destruction. The possibility of a Palestinian state gets more remote with the passage of time and will soon cease to exist. The PA was corrupt and useless and has been replaced by 6th century book burners. Very sad. Mike

    • 21. 0 0
      #7 PETER SM
      • Johnboy
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:31

      "they can return to the Islamic Repulic of Palestine" Yep, they sure can, PETER. So long as the land they want to return to is in the Islamic Republic of Palestine. But what if it isn't? You say they can't return? Why? Because Israel doesn't want them? Not a good enough reason, PETER. If a country establishes sovereignty over land, then it is obliged to extent it's sovereignty to the people who were living on that land. THEM'S THE RULES, PETER. Why should Israel be treated any differently?

    • 20. 0 0
      Israelis have the right and duty
      • JW
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:30

      of return to the lands whence they or their forebears came during the past 100 years.

    • 19. 0 0
      No recognition for Israel and no halt to resistance
      • Clickfool
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:27

      With Israel planning yet another illegal settlement at Maskiot, deep in the West Bank, it is clearly ludicrous to expect Hamas to abandon armed resistance to this sort of unsubtle Israeli provocation.

    • 18. 0 0
      #3 No Paulo, unfortunately
      • Johnboy
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:27

      I think the point you make will fly WAY, WAY over their heads. It's easy for them to dig their heels in when you talk about Pals - TERRORISTS ALL! - and Pal refugees - THEY WENT AWAY ON HOLIDAYS IN 48!! - and a Palestinian state - THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PALESTINE!!!! Much harder to argue it away when the central problems are explained as a series of bedrock principles of Int'l Law that apply to EVERYBODY. But when you do that they just go all blank and say "Huh? Watcha talking about? THAT doesn't apply to Pals TERRORISTS, or to us! We're special!"

    • 17. 0 0
      Resistance
      • Fed Up
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:22

      Resistance to what is perceived as unjust is a basic right in open societies. Thoreau advocated resistance in the form of civil disobedience. Gandhi and MLK put this into practice and helped lead international conscience towards new moral paradigms. There's nothing wrong with resistance. The problem is, perhaps, that Palestinian independence movements have historically confused violent aggression with legitimate resistance...and the international community has widely and unproductively stood behind this confusion. The key question isn't whether or not Palestinians will resist, but whether they will do so legitimately and legally, or whether the PA will continue to let aggressive war crimes (suicide bombs and Qassams aimed at civilians, etc.) go unpunished.

    • 16. 0 0
      best for the palestinians
      • Sameer S Reehani
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:20

      No one in the world wishes to be ruled by another.It is also wise that all palestinian's grievences must be resolved through peaceful means.Resisitance to an occupation can only be acomplished through negotiations,and not by bombing,killing innocent people.The palestinians must therefore come to a clear conclusion that they 'll ultimately gain more by a sit-down with the Israelis.I'm very certain it will work.

    • 15. 0 0
      Eternal war!
      • Honi
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:10

      It's beginning to sound reasonable for Israel to continue building the wall, barrier whatever to call it and just use Palestine as a garbage can. Hamas has pushed the self-destruction button it seems. The stupidity of both Israelis and Palestinians is saddening, since they prompt for eternal war and misery.

    • 14. 0 0
      The new Hamas government does not adhere to the three demands of
      • Nadav
      • 15.03.07
      • 13:09

      the international community: 1) It is not committed to previously signed agreements with Israel, only those that meet, in its opinion, the interests of the Palestinian Arab people. 2) It does not recognize Israel's right to exist, and in essence calls for its annihilation as spelled out clearly in Hamas's Charter, or if you will, calling for the annihilation of a member state of the United Nations. 3) It does not accept the end of terror and violence against Israel and Israelis. In fact, it calls for continuing the "resistance" until the liberation of Palestine (Palestine, being the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea). In addition, it demands the return of Palestinian Arab "refugees" persons, to "their property" inside Israel. This is really a call once again, to fight the very existence of the Jewish state through the use of demography, in addition to attempts annihilate it militarily, economically, politically and legally. The new Hamas government!

    • 13. 0 0
      no double standards with HAMAS.
      • arab
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:58

      do zionist have the right to drag 'JEWS' from all over to palestine, ones who never been to palestine or have any ties with the holy land what so ever and deny LAND OWNERS that SAME right. and you tell me HAMAS DOES NOT LOOK FOR PEACE? THEN WHAT ARE U LOOKING FOR , U ARE LOOKING FOR SUBMISSION, AND , U WILL NEVER EVER GET IT. AND REGUGEES WILL BE BACK TO THEIR HOMES AND LAND IN PALESTINE.

    • 12. 0 0
      Paulo - You have called right here not to recognize
      • Gadi Finklestein
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:54

      Israel's right to exist. Reading your words, therefore, must be undrstood in this context. You do not recognize our very right to exist as a state, and you still hold us responsible for the killing of Jesus Christ, as you have wrote here also. And as of today you have not said anything to the contrary, nothing!

    • 11. 0 0
      Khalid
      • Daniel
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:53

      AND... you will never properly be able to serve your people by means of futile dreams. You suffer from childish attitudes, Khalid, and are condemning yourself (and us!) to a War of 100 years... Most Israelis want peace with you and despite you, but none wants to commit suicide. Sorry.

    • 10. 0 0
      TACTICS,TACTICS & MORE TACTICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      • Jeremy
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:45

      Hamas is islamol-facist ideology that seeks the empire of sharia. Dealing is dealing with the devil. Any negotiation will only lead to more suffering and war!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 9. 0 0
      KHALID they can return to the Islamic Repulic of Palestine
      • PETER SM
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:42

      Forget the Jihadist imperialism even though you cannot help yourselves and need to rule everywhere.

    • 8. 0 0
      "Right of return"
      • Jairo
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:38

      Putting aside for the moment the inexistence of the "right of return" to a country of persons who were never inhabitants of that country or that for the most part left it voluntarily, how can te core of a national movement be the migration of would be new citizens to a foreign nation instead of their own?

    • 7. 0 0
      Their only common goal (Hamas and Fatah islamofascists)
      • maurice
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:29

      the destruction of Israël

    • 6. 0 0
      Khalid #1
      • Xaxam
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:28

      My brother! You forgot to add compensations at the level of $100,000 per year since 1948, shares in Saudi Royal Oil Co., and "le droit du seigneur" in regard of all female occupiers who served in the Israeli Occupation Forces. Without this bare minimum, a just settlement is impossible. If you agree for less, you are a traitor to the Palestinian case!

    • 5. 0 0
      #3 Yeh ok
      • Clint
      • 15.03.07
      • 12:18

      Umm There not occupied, Maybe talk to Jordan and Egypt and ask them to take them back. To be Honest I think Israel and the USA are sick of paying for them. Remember the so called camps which are really town and cities they live in were an act of kindness by Israel. We could have forced them all back into Jordan and let them deal with them the way they dealt with them some years ago by killing mass amounts of them. Get a history book please.

    • 4. 0 0
      IT'S WAR!!!!
      • Lynn
      • 15.03.07
      • 11:38

      the expected Israeli response, to reject all peaceful overtures either directly or indirectly. It's obvious Israeli loves the status quo, it can digest non-jewish territory slowly, make life intolerable for existing non-jews (with the collusion of Western sanctions) so they leave, and kill with impunity any non-jew that gets in the way. Israel can stay like this for ages.

    • 3. 0 0
      The Intl Standard
      • Paulo
      • 15.03.07
      • 11:16

      Anyone notice that everything that Haniyeh and Abbas are quoted as saying is actually legal and in within the full guidelines of international standards - that a people under occupation have the right to resistance, the right of return for refugees be secured and of course the right to self-determination is a common human standard for all.

    • 2. 0 0
      WHAT A BUNCH OF LAWYER BULL-SPEAK!
      • B'Galil
      • 15.03.07
      • 11:14

      So they're gonna abide by previous agreements that call for an end to violence and at the same time continue to use "resistance" (read: terror) tactics against Israelis? Hamas may be able to fool their own people but not Israelis.

    • 1. 0 0
      Right of return is soul and heart and core of the Palestinian
      • Khalid
      • 15.03.07
      • 10:57

      problem. ANd East Jerusalem is the capital of the Palestinian state.