• Published 19:26 25.03.10
  • Latest update 08:13 26.03.10

Petraeus to Ashkenazi: I never said Israel policy endangers U.S.

Petraeus denies blaming Israel for stalled peace progress; Gates: Conflict 'affects' U.S. security interests.

By Natasha Mozgovaya Tags: US

Commander of the U.S. Military's Central Command Gen. David Petraeus phoned his Israeli counterpart, Gabi Ashkenazi, this week to deny reports that he had blamed Israeli policy for the failure in a regional solution and for endangering U.S. interests.

Earlier this month, Petraeus warned the Pentagon that "America's relationship with Israel is important, but not as important as the lives of America's soldiers," in a posting on the Foreign Policy Web site.

In a 56-page report, the Central Command had written: "The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests," the CENTCOM report read.

Petraeus told reporters on Thursday that the report - which he claimed had been taken out of context - had been drafted because: "We noted in there that there was a perception at times that America sides with Israel and so forth. And I mean, that is a perception. It is there. I don't think that's disputable."

"But I think people inferred from what that said and then repeated it a couple of times and bloggers picked it up and spun it," he added. "And I think that has been unhelpful, frankly."

Responding to questions regarding that report, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates warned that the ongoing Palestinian-Israeli conflict gave enemies of the two allies the opportunity to "exploit" the lack of a political settlement.

"Lack of progress toward Middle East peace is clearly an issue that is exploited by our adversaries in the region and is a source of certainly political challenge," said Gates. "Whether it has a direct impact, I'm not entirely sure. But there is no question that the absence of Middle East peace does affect U.S. national security interests in the region."

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, meanwhile, told reporters at the same briefing that the relationship between the U.S. Army and the Israel Defense Forces remained "exceptionally" strong.

Mullen added that he had been in contact with IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi twice this week and that the U.S. was concerned with Israel's security because:

"It is in our national interests obviously or we wouldn't be so engaged... the United States has considered peace in the Middle East to be a national security interest for decades."

Also Thursday, th U.S. State Department said that it was still "working on keeping proximity talks moving forward with goal of resuming direct negotiations as soon as possible," despite the recent tensions between the U.S. and Israel over construction in East Jerusalem.

Meanwhile, nearly 300 members of Congress have signed on to a declaration reaffirming their commitment to "the unbreakable bond that exists between [U.S.] and the State of Israel", in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The letter was sent in the wake of the severe recent tensions between Israel and the U.S. over the prior's decision to construct more than 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem, a project it announced during U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's visit to the region.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took advantage of his trip to the United States this week to try to mend the rift with the Obama administration, but he was greeted with cold welcome by the White House.

Netanyahu also met during his visit with members of Congress, who welcomed him with significantly more warmth.

The letter from Congress expresses its "deep concern" over the U.S.-Israel crisis, and emphasizes that lawmakers had received assurances from Netanyahu that the events leading up to the recent tensions would not be repeated.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Photo by: (Archive)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 11. 0 0
    Now we are talking!
    • lincoln
    • 26.03.10
    • 05:20

    I agree with what Oren originally said that this is the worst crisis in Israeli-US relations. Mind you i dont think Oren is the greates diplomat, but he was right on this. For US army generals to say something to the effect that Israeli actions are killing American soldiers is astonishing! Think for a while about the implications of this. Also, notice the show of support for Gen. Paterus, with Gates and Mullen coming to defend him with full support. I'm not sure of exactly what has been happening with US Israel relations, but OH BOY things have changed!

  • 10. 0 0
    The cat and the 'owner'
    • Johnnymac
    • 26.03.10
    • 04:55

    I am pro Israel, i make no bones about it, but i read the best description of the US/Israel relationship ever, there were tears in my eyes laughing when i read it.Israel is like the cat, who gets the occasional stroke from its 'owner'.(and sometimes will scratch the 'owners' hand) But if the cat could work out how to open the fridge, and work the can opener, it would not need the owner,:-)).

  • 9. 0 0
    Then Why Won't Obama Guarantee a Peace Agreement?
    • Dave
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:41

    Somethin's fishy here. If ME peace were really in the interest of the US, then they would not have turned down the British request to provide security guarantees for Middle East peace. Asking Israel to sacrifice huge chunks of vital security land because 'it's surely safe' is one thing. Backing up your advice with your own security guarantees puts your money where your mouth is. Smell the coffee, Gates, and guarantee our security and you'll get your deal.

  • 8. 0 0
    By same selective and biased logic...
    • Ty Wahn
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:38

    So by the same logic I suppose the Taiwan-Chinese conflict foments anti-American sentiment in the region to a perception of U.S. favoritism towards Taiwan. So General Petraeus when are we pulling out of Taiwan?

  • 7. 0 0
    Obvious
    • arik
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:32

    Patreus is an intelligent man. He culdn't have said such a nonsense. But even if he had, so what?

  • 6. 0 0
    America is fighting wars for israel
    • Tony Silver
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:32

    "America's relationship with Israel is important, but not as important as the lives of America's soldiers," Petraeus said.

  • 5. 0 0
    A non-denial denial if I've seen one. Of course he said it...
    • peacelover
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:31

    Why would it have taken him so long to come out and correct the record if he doesn't think it's true? He's just being diplomatic now to smooth over ruffled feathers.

  • 4. 0 0
  • 3. 0 0
  • 2. 0 0
    General: It is a small point
    • Jasper
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:25

    The larger point is that you are in Afghanistan for one reason only: To put Osama bin Laden's head on a pike. Please get to it, and leave. All this nation building nonsense, the education of girls, roads, growing radishes instead of poppie, voting with a ballot instead of an AK47, a national outlook instead of tribal warlords defending villages, ... etc etc, will all vanish like the morning mist the day we leave. Why does anyone believe that an entire culture dating to antiquity will turn on a dime because we roar around in humvees for a few years waving the red white and blue?

  • 1. 0 0
    Petraeus to Ashkenazi: I never said Israeli policy endangers U.S.
    • Natallie Durson
    • 25.03.10
    • 20:24

    It was Osama Bin Laden that said that, well after the 9/11 attack. I guess he should know better than anybody.