PA Chair Abbas lays out first precise demands for Palestinian borders
PA Chair gives first details on amount of land wanted for state, wants withdrawal from areas captured in 1967.
By The Associated Press Tags: Mahmoud AbbasPalestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday laid out his most specific demands for the borders of a future independent state, calling for a full Israeli withdrawal from all territories captured in the 1967 Six-Day War.
Abbas' claim comes as Israeli and Palestinian negotiating teams are trying to hammer out a joint vision for a future peace deal in time for a U.S.-hosted conference next month.
With Israel seeking to retain parts of the West Bank and east Jerusalem, Abbas' comments appeared to set the stage for tough negotiations, which are expected to include complicated arrangements such as land swaps and shared control over holy sites.
In a television interview, Abbas said the Palestinians want to establish a state on 6,205 square kilometers of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It was the first time he has given a precise number for the amount of land he is seeking.
"We have 6,205 square kilometers in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip," Abbas told Palestine TV. "We want it as it is."
According to Palestinian negotiating documents obtained by The Associated Press, the Palestinian demands include all of the Gaza Strip, West Bank, east Jerusalem and small areas along the West Bank frontier that were considered no-man's land before the Six-Day War.
But at the same time, Abbas left the door open for a land swap. "A border adjustment, on the basis of the same quality and the same amount, we have no objections," he said.
Palestinian officials confirmed that Abbas would be willing to adjust his claims, as long as they end up with the same amount of land. His aides have said he has agreed in recent talks with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to exchange West Bank land Israel wants to keep in a final peace deal with an equal amount of Israeli land. This would allow Israel to annex the West Bank area where the settlement blocs are located.
Abbas said his claim is backed by United Nations resolutions. "This is our vision for the Palestinian independent state with full sovereignty on its borders, water and resources."
David Baker, an official in the Prime Minister's office, told Haaretz that "both sides are involved in a continuous dialogue to make as much progress as possible."
Israeli and Palestinian negotiators held their first working meeting this week as they try to hammer out a joint declaration in time for next month's conference. The U.S. hopes the document will provide a launching ground for full-fledged negotiations on a final peace agreement.
Israel captured the territories in the Six-Day War and hopes in a final peace deal with the Palestinians to hold on to parts of the West Bank where settlement blocs are located. Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005.
As part of the proposal, Abbas offered Olmert about 2 percent of the West Bank, the aides said. Olmert is seeking some 6-8 percent of the West Bank, but has said the exact amount of territory should be decided in future negotiations. The aides spoke on condition of anonymity since they were not authorized to discuss sensitive diplomatic matters with the media.
In exchange for the West Bank land, Israel is reportedly considering transferring to the Palestinians a strip of area between the Gaza Strip and West Bank to allow for a connection between them. About 40 kilometers of Israeli territory separates the two Palestinian territories.
Abbas said the joint statement at the conference must deal with the main hurdles preventing a final peace agreement.
"The international conference must include the six major issues that are Jerusalem, refugees, borders, settlements, water and security," Abbas said.
Related articles:
|
Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas (AP) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
i IS 40 YEARS SINCE THE 6 DAY WAR!! iSRAEL HAS GIVEN UP THE sINAI 3 TIMES--and all they got was a fake peace with Egypt. Egypt wanted the land and the OIL - they also knew they could not defeat Israel -So Carter's presure won,Begin had no choice .There was no country of Palestine , no gov't etc It was just land -Jews etc had lived there also - So why is it nowto be a State at the expense of Israel???
"Jordan can use the population, has lots more room than Israel---" Are you saying that it is Israel's goal to push all the Palestinians out and into Jordan? Maybe they'll leave voluntarily. What the heck if they don't, Israel can always bring out its hunk of junk tank the Merkava or maybe an F16 or two. Then there's the problem of what to do with over a million Palestinians who are Israeli citizens. Sterilization maybe? End of the Palestinian question.
...but all good things must come to an end! This post will conclude my correspondence with you as Daybreak and as Truth. Thanks for writing!
Jordan can use the population, has lots more room than Israel---It could become a major industrial power, similar to Israel---It needs educated people, and there are plenty among the Palestinian's who have nothing better to do that wage war...
You need lessons in honesty. Moreover, your presence on Talkback is pointless. Please show me one post you have written in which you demonstrate any knowledge of the subject on which you are writing. There are some posters whom I disagree with vehemently but I acknowledge their knowledgeability. You are not among them, which is no doubt why you spend half your time on Talkback seeking reassurance and attention from other posters who share a certain point of view about Israel and the Palestinians that you pretend to share but are in fact in no position to form an informed opinion about either way.
It is a start. More reasonable than "we are going to push you into the sea"
should be part of Jordan? Can't be...that the Palestinians should move into Jordan now and leave the West Bank to the Israelis? But I have read that Jordan is already 70% Palestinian population, what's left would be overwhelmed. Actually, they are all Arabs of the same descent, but the problem might be, is there room enough in Jordan? Every inch of the middle east is claimed, built on, lived on, claimed again...If I were a Palestinian living in the WB or Gaza, I would try my best to get into Jordan, actually...
Sorry for scattering it about like buckshot... (can buckshot be fatal if someone is shot with it?) ...but you do see my point; you ask me for something, and when I do get it, I am desperate for you to see it...so I put it everywhere. Another thing...can you write something like 30-30-30-30 when a subject is finished with? Because otherwise I just keep going on and on about it...sometimes you say, Final!
...the fakers you were discussing, recently someone said that Victor Hardman and Paul Harris are the same and quoted a post they said proved it, something about addresses. I think it was Viper said that Paul was pretending to be an Israel and he was Victor Hardman in Ireland...but I don't know the truth of it. Post-Its are a good idea, and I understand what you're saying about refuting what ballistic says, and her not providing sources...however, with all this, I still dislike racist namecalling, and I don't think that Misha- whoever-it-was should have used the word macacca...I googled macacca too, and it has many meanings, but unfortunately, since the Senator Allen comment, it seems to have only one meaning in use now. In fact, Misha in a post to me admitted right up front that he wanted to be insulting. But...insults are one thing; racist names are another.
"No, that`s not a personal attack on you; it`s a verifiable statement of fact" It's your opinion; and you know what they say about opinions, don't you?
I don't need any lessons on Talkback. I've been here quite a while now. But thank you anyway.
I seen your response twice before, not including this, which makes it three times-- I've replied twice---Let's try and keep it in one string if at all possible---
Forget memory, use a post-it note or scrap paper to retain the info...I know less now than I did before--I still have that string to Steve, I'll check it again---Not every suspicious poster requries a check, some out themselves when they write, making it obvious that they'e fakers--- Just yesterday, I ran across someone who wrote four posts, two from Las Cruces and two from "Seatle"...Same fellow two separate states and couldn't spell Seatle properly---
Palestinian's have received more than adequate consideration, it's called "JORDAN", land stolen from the Jews by the British and Given to Emir Hussein to create a Kingdom---
By this time I'm certain that you're aware that I won't tolerate out and out lies--I'm not corressponding, I'm refuting lies and distortions---I can understand various positions in a matter, but you can't tell me black is white and insist you're correct If I can see the color is black---When I ask her/it, to send proof of the statement, it heads for the hills---I'm certain you know that I'll always give a proof of link for any of my statements---
Scattered across the Internet, what you've used so many words to get from me what I meant about the West Bank on a mpa...you see the West Bank here?? http://www.teachinghearts.org/dr0imapisrael.gif
By the way, if you want a quick lesson in how things actually operate on Talkback, as opposed to your fantasies and lies, look at the constant personal attacks on Jeff Northridge in any thread and the relative absence of personal attacks in his responses.
Playing dumb is a polite phrase for what you are doing. In my post #413, of several DAYS ago now, I quoted Hannah to you, as follows: "clearly you are a very uneducated, unread, illiterate, true-believing, and, even worse, American dolt." But it doesn't matter, does it, Silvienne, that you are "referring to personal attacks on individual posters" and that that is exactly what that is and you've known that now for days. You don't care about the truth and have been ignoring it, stretching it, denying it, and violating it for the whole interchange with me and you'll keep on doing so in your posts and in your discussion with me because that is how you operate. No, that's not a personal attack on you; it's a verifiable statement of fact.
Well, you've proved my point. Called me "dumb", "need to take a course on whatever" in one post! Never mind. Hannah hates Israel and says so often and loudly. I am referring to personal attacks on individual posters simply because they are supporting Palestinians. Personal abusive insulting attacks on individuals. Not generic hating Israel posts like Hannah's.
Is the ghost of Assad!
I already have shown you such a post, Hannah's, so don't play dumb. It is worse than the one you point to. As to your evidence for three times the number of Palestinian posters, you need to take a course on statistics if you think that is evidence "just from counting them in various threads."
..about asking "Steve of Minneapolis" a Jewish question, because tonight I was reading a Talkback in which I saw a post from you to him requesting a reply and with a few Hebrew words in your post...now, he'd posted elsewhere in the talkback, but hadn't responded to you.... Typical of me, I can't remember now which talkback it was, but if I see it again I'll send you the link. Did you ask "Israeli Guy" the Jewish question, and did you get no response? Is that how you know he isn't? And then, somewhere else, I remember recently a woman pro-Israel poster saying to a guy who had a Jewish name, you're no Jew, and he posted back to her, Do you want the number of my (two Hebrew words)...See what I mean, she must have been testing him out too, but, typical, I can't remember what talkback that was in either... Do you know Shakespeare's "Othello", Ben...in which Othello says, "I remember a mass of things, but not distinctly"...that sums up my mind perfectly! Regards
My thoughts run away with me so much, it's difficult to remember to keep the subjects grouped together in their respective posts... I agree that the Jews have lived in what Christians call the "holy land" for thousands of years, ever since they were the Israelites, in fact, or the "children of Israel", as the Bible calls them. I was actually reading Judges in the Old Testament the other day and saw a reference to "Schem" (not spelled right) which I know is now Nablus. So that is many thousands of years of history in this region. But my point is that the Palestinians have lived there for several hundred years; at least, they were living there in 1922 when an Israeli state was first thought of...therefore, they deserve consideration, and not to be pushed aside as if they had no rights at all. Of course, that's only my opinion, and I know you don't agree with it.
"If you wish, I`ll send you copies of a couple of letters that were exchanged" Do you mean posts, or actual letters? If you dislike her so much, why bother corresponding with her? As you say, I've noticed and read some of it...
There are others beside "Israeli Guy" who attempt to deceive---When in doubt, I ask one simple question that ANY Jew would know the answer to---For instance, I asked Steve, of Minneapolis that very question, because he claimed to be Jewish, even though all of his writings are anti-Israel---Any true Jew would have come back with the answer, it's as simple as 1-2-3---As of this writing, unless it's posted elsewhere and I haven't run across it, all I hear is a vast silence from Steve---Guess what that tells me---???
Daybreak was being gentle, I have worse names that I can think of for Ballistic---She lies, and deceives--I've caught her time and again, so many times, that in fact, it's become rather boring---She has no scruples and will descend to any depth to put her point across---Surely, you must have noticed some of my correspondence with her---She makes claims and accusations, and when asked to back them up, she runs for the hills---Most of it is pure nonsense that she's made up on the spur of the moment--- If you wish, I'll send you copies of a couple of letters that were exchanged---I personally don't care if she's a hottentot or a Martian, I do care that she's an out and out liar---
Do me and yourself a big favor--Try and keep each post to a single topic, don't chain them together--Palestinians didn't exist until the Roman Emperor made up the name---It was intended as an insult and it was a designation for Gaza, not Judea & Israel---The Jews have ALWAYS, since time immemorial, lived in the area---When Rome took Jews captive, many still remained---The so-called Palestinian's are drifters that came into the area within the past few hundred years---Most came as laborers to work the farms of absentee Arab landlords, later they also came to work Jewish farms--- If Palestinin's had had any sort of civilization, there would be vestiges of their presence, dating back at least to the time when the Romans conquered Israel---that's what the coins, antiquities and TELS would have substantiated---Despite my repeated requests, NOBODY has given me valid information where they can be located----They don't exist because there never, ever was a land designated as Palestine..
I honestly assure you I wasn't trying to be "cute"..I'm far too old to ever be cute in any way; I thought you knew that... I can understand that you see the Jolly Roger of Israeli Guy from a distance..Jasmine Murphy said she posted from London, which I doubted, for the same sorts of reasons that you know Israeli Guy isn't one. However, of course, it may be true; I don't know. Yes, a home isn't the same as a public facility, so probably my question was a bit daft. My thoughts are not always easy to arrange or to articulate well. Regards
It's my assertion that there are about three times more pro-Israeli posters as there are pro-Palestinian posters just from counting them in the various threads. In one thread I counted, out of 12 posters, 2 were pro-Palestinian, other 10 were pro-Israel. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/911863.html you'll see my post commenting on it. The worst abuse I've seen so far is a pro-Israeli poster calling Ballistic, who is an African-American woman, "macacca", which as she said, is a racist slur. Show me a post from a pro-Palestinian poster that you consider contains a personal abusive attack on a pro-Israeli poster for an actual example of what you mean, please.
"In my post #423 I queried you concerning statistics---I guess you been so busy posting you haven`t had the time to respond to my requests--To refresh your memory and accelerate your response, here it is again" Ben, if you asked me something, when would I ever not reply to it???? The difficulty is to get me to stop talking/writing...But, what was my assertion...post #388 was me to Katherine someone about slagging off posts...did you mean in another thread/string? I posted in this thread to Daybreak examples of pro-Israeli abuse posts. But as for ancient coins or artifacts, are these supposed to support the fact that Palestinians lived on the land thousands of years ago? Because they didn't...the Israelites lived in the holy land in ancient times...
?We don`t know whether "Israeli Guy" is an Israel or whether Jasmine Murphy is a Jew?--- 1-YOU don?t know, I do, he?s sailing under false colors, and we can see his Jolly Roger from quite a distance---It?s really easy to detect a faker---Jasmine Murphy, there are Jews in Ireland, one was the mayor of a major Irish city--- ?You wouldn`t consider this to be racist or "anti" if someone posted it the reverse way around..."Jews on occasion when invited, non Jews anytime" 2- Of course not, my home is a private facility, not public---You have your friends, I have mine--- Does it also mean you`d believe a Jew over a non-Jew at any time, over any matter?--- 3. This doesn?t enter into it, it wasn?t discussed---I believe according to credibility, this isn?t a Court of Law---What does this have to do with the price of tea in China..??? A rather silly question, if you ask me--- I suppose I`d better answer my own question, much as I`ll dislike the answer 4- Of course you?ll dislike the answer, you were trying to be cute---
What is your point? I specifically told you I'd posted to condemn at least one pro-Israeli poster who was unkind. I haven't seen you do the same for any on the other "side," though they have been brought to your attention. Now where is the evidence for your statement that there are three times as many pro-Israel posters here as pro-Palestinian? If you don't have any evidence don't bother to reply. I don't have any interest in more evasions from you.
"You really ought to concentrate why the `Israeli Guy" falsely claimed to be a Jew" We don't know whether "Israeli Guy" is an Israel or whether Jasmine Murphy is a Jew. "Non-jews on occasion, when invited---Jews at anytime, just knock on the door..." You wouldn't consider this to be racist or "anti" if someone posted it the reverse way around..."Jews on occasion when invited, non Jews anytime" Does it also mean you'd believe a Jew over a non-Jew at any time, over any matter? I suppose I'd better answer my own question, much as I'll dislike the answer. Still, you've told me what I wanted to know...
You are referring to "sickening stream of blatantly anti-semetic posts here", and I am referring to personal attacks, such as: "you are stupid, vile, hateful, disgusting, a bitch"..sort of stuff. Would you give me an example of a post that you consider "blatanly anti-semitic", so I can read it and tell you what I think?
"Wrong, Mr. Forest. Your condescencion drips venom from your fangs. Your Palestinian-favoring bone needs scratching, and not all who post here are easily categorized. Of course, that wouldn`t fit into your neat little boxes, so just ignore reality, neh?" Post from a pro-Israeli/zionist to a pro-Palestinian. Nice, yes?
#435 Are the current occupiers of "Israel" the real indigenous people of the Holy Land? No. How can Europeans be indigenous in the Middle East? They should all go back to their original homes -- in Poland, Russia, and other parts of East Europe. And one day they will. The indigenous people of Israel (and the whole of Palestine) are Palestinians and the Middle Eastern Jews, who lived together for centuries as sisters and brothers until Zionism was created.
In my post #423 I queried you concerning statistics---I guess you been so busy posting you haven't had the time to respond to my requests--To refresh your memory and accelerate your response, here it is again--- #388 Silvienne Name: * BEN JABO City: USA State: Do you have any actual statistics that you`ve compiled to justify your assertion???--Actually, I see an awful lot of pro-arab threats and distortions of historical fact--- I`m still waiting for anyone to supply a few items that I`ve requested, time and again--- Sites of Palestinian "TEL", ANCIENT COINS, ARTIFACTS.---The must be of Roman era in Palestine or before---Piles of donkey or camel dung aren`t acceptable---Just maybe, YOU can let me know where to find the things I`ve been so desperately searching for---
Non-jews on occasion, when invited---Jews at anytime, just knock on the door... You really ought to concentrate why the 'Israeli Guy" falsely claimed to be a Jew---We have so many that assume obviously false Jewish type names to do their postings, not having the courage to use a name indicative of their true ethnicity---
By the way, (regarding my previous post to you), "Ashkenazic" means European Jew, so you can't fall back on your we mean Zionists not Jews line here. In addition, let me mention this. When a pro-Zionist poster made what I considered a very unkind comment to Indrajaya at the time of the earthquake in her country I posted (under the name of Trust, which I was posting under at the time) a response to the pro-Zionist poster saying I thought his post was "sickening." You of course do the opposite, and just try to pretend as if the sickening stream of blatantly anti-Semitic posts here are no problem; yours is the typical tactic of just accusing one side of evil, which is typical of small-minded people everywhere. I've spoken out against bigotry on both sides.
Where is your evidence that there are three times the number of pro-Israeli posters here as pro-Palestinian, Silvienne? You want to see racist, try this: "As opposed to your diluted, mongrelized zionists (through Khazar, aka Ashkenazim blood )." Posted by Hannah 15/07/07. Check the lineage of the accusation that Jews are mongrels with impure blood. That is classic racism. My larger question to you, Silvienne, is do you feel any constraint whatever to respect FACTS and not make up whatever you feel like in your posts?
Joe, In a perfect world you would be right. However, as recently as 2006, Hamas leaders have stated IMPLICITLY that ANY *peace* deal is just PHASE 1...that they intend to take ALL the land via whatever means necessary. Hamas has, to Western media said one thing, but to Arab media quite a different thing. Fatah has also done essentially the same thing. Their main strategy is that in order to crate a bulwark for future attacks, they must make peace, taking what they can get for now, with the ultimate goal of destroying Israel piece by piece, if necessary. This two faced mindset is indemic to the Palestinian leaders How can Israel negotiate with the likes of that? Keep in mind this is the LEADERS of the Palestinians talking...not a few people on talkbacks suggesting it. Israel has made enough attempts at peace with the Pals, to NO avail. Heck, Israel gave back ALL Sinai to Egypt, yet, with all their checkpoints THROUGHOUT Egypt, Hamas still manages to smuggle missiles into Gaza.
It sounds like a good deal so long as everyone's security is guaranteed. I think both sides want peace, the outline for a deal are clear, it's time to do it. Iran has said they will support whatever the Palestinians agree to, and my guess is that will be the attitude of all surrounding countries. People are tired of war and want to move on. It's time.
I am not going to be hosed, as you put it (such good terms you use!) but as you see I have been gnawed by several zionists here, and lastly, I have posted a question to Ben Jabo concerning his post #426, and I really would like an answer from him to my question.
I don't quite see the point of your post. Jasmine Murphy was telling Israeli Guy he's no Israeli, I was telling her she's no Jew. Do you really want to take sides on this one? You write this: Any Jew, regardless of nationality or country of origin is welcome in my home, to sleep in my bed and eat at my table" To be clear on this: you are referring to only Jews, is that right? And simply because they are Jews?
This thread, calling himself Star of David, #399. Good example of a personal attack from a person I know nothing about and have never posted to. Pointless, except for the purpose of slinging abuse. Still, if it makes "Star of David" feel better, then we won't stop him.... Thanks for writing again! (and again...)
#399 to me from "Star of David". Again, no content, no reason for writing, except the desire to post a personal attack. Very silly. And yes, I am from both London and Connecticut. You, also, have provided me with an excellent example of an abusive personal attack post from zionists. Thank you for the example!
personal attack you made on me, calling me "remarkably simple-minded". Now, where was the need for that? Can you explain? If you want to know about my place of residence and England, you can ask me. You don't need to call me "remarkably simple minded". You just gave me a good example of what I mean by personal attacks by zionists.
I'm speaking of personal attacks. Here, I'll give you examples of what I've read from zionist posters: "jew haters antisemite burn in hell you dont deserve to be alive stupid filthy arab mental defective spewing hateful bitch...." for a start. Seen all of those from zionist posters. Lakshmi I haven't seen post personal attacks, although she has been called a "Paki" by a zionist poster, which is the exact equivalent of the "N word" to Pakistanis. Mark Lincoln and the Master Race? Never saw that, but it isn't the same as a personal attack against one person. No, I don't think they are telling the truth, so there's no need for your sarcastic comment.
My dear Daybreak, we are speaking of proportionality here. There are three times the amount of pro-Israeli posters here as there are pro-Palestinian posters. And I have never seen a racist term used by any pro-Pal. Whereas, I have seen "dirty arab", "paki", "macacca" used by pro-Israelis. Everything in proportion, my dear.
Fed Up to Ivar:"You just utter piffle.Akram can each you manners to begin with.How are things in miserable Estonia?I`ll bet you are dying to be rid of the many Muslims who have overran your country.But,please don`t come whining here to us now will you? Boo Hoo !!" Now, there's a profound and thought-provoking post. Did you just step out of kindergarten, Fed-Up?
I hope that if the government enters peace talks with the Palestinians that involve return/exchange of land, it will be wise enough to see to it that Palestine will not become a base for anti-Israeli warfare. This must be a condition of any peace deal. 100% security vs. land and property arrangements. One of the reasons that Clinton's plan did not work was because Arafat refused to declare the end of the conflict. It seems that there is now Palestinian leadership, supported by other Arabs, that is willing to do it. Whether it has the means and power to carry it out is a very serious question. I am sure it will be addressed before any withdrawal takes place. The principles of security and return of parts of occupied lands are fundamental for any peace deal. A positive approach, involving give and take, is preferrable to a nuclear war. With Iran continuing uninhibited in the development of nukes this might be the only other alternative.
Colonization is outdated. Since the 1900s, in fact. If Israel doesn't realise this, and quick, the settlement programme will put an end to all peace plans.
"I`m REALLY getting sick of the people DEMANDING Israel do this or that for peace" Ah, really? I'm getting sick of the Palestinian people having no state of their own and losing more and more land every day. So, you tell me: what would you like to see as the future of the Palestinian people? Crouched behind the separation wall, hiding in lockdown in the WB, starving in Gaza, every day getting killed by the IDF? What would be your plan for them? Do you have one? (They are not going to disappear, either) Therefore, Israel had better deal with the situation.
"Peace comes to the peaceful" Ivar. War comes to the peaceful Ivar. How many men of peace taken from their Homes and died in WWl & WWII. ? How peace was won after the last two World Wars? Isn't that to convince you that no Peace can be won with out WAR to sweep away the excrements of humanity. "Stealing the neighbors property on the pretex of security" Ivar When the West Bank was under Jordaian Control with Jordaian flag hoisted all over the place; those whom you call 'neighbors' never raised a fingure and never claimed a title to anything that was called Palestine ? Why now ? Isn't it because those 'neighbors' are people of hate and double face ragbags ? Trying to build a country with lies ? "fig leaf" Ivar. Jews used 'fig leafs'to save themselves through out the ages.That was the only what was left to them in the nasty world before they have their State.Israel the only shield that can save them. Now,go and look in your History Book and burn your Dictionary.
And PLEASE DO tell me.. How did Israel 8STEAL* anything? They miraculously won a war they didn't want in 1967, and in that victory they captured land which theArab states AND the Palestinians REFUSED for 20+ years to even negotiate for return of. In fact, Egypt REFUSED to take Gaza back even though Israel offered it to them. So get off your IGNORANT hose and get some education on the TRUE situation in the region.
Ivar..PLEASE DO tell me this... 1. Why should Israel withdraw to the 67 borders after a war NOT of its wanting? 2. Why should Israel withdraw after 40 YEARS waiting for a true peace partner? 3. Do you SERIOUSLY believe the PA, either Hamas OR Fatah REALLY want peace when they a. Rfuse to disavow the ultimate goal of the destruction of Israel b. Say 1 thing to Western press/reporters, and a totally opposite to their compatriots c. STILL use Suicide bombers to do their dirty work as a means to show that if the negotiations don't go the way THEY want that more suicide bombers will attack. 4. Why should Israel believe the Pals really want a fair and ust peace when only Israel is expected and held to the Oslo agreements/accords. Certainly, the PA hasn't upheld a single principle of the accords. 5. Why should Israel give up a city, Jerusalem, which was 2/3 Jewish for 300+ years PRIOR to 1948? I'm REALLY getting sick of the people DEMANDING Israel do this or that for peace..
You just utter piffle.Akram can each you manners to begin with.How are things in miserable Estonia?I'll bet you are dying to be rid of the many Muslims who have overran your country.But,please don't come whining here to us now will you? Boo Hoo !!
abbas already has a "palestinian" state. he should be negotiating with jordan where he and his people have come from. but of course they dont want them. the jordanians know from experience what trouble makers these people are. these "palestinians" as they cal themselves should all be deported. much like any other soverien country does when there illegal immigrants in their borders. especially when they are terrorists.
Don't let Ben Jabo hose you down with his usual BS about maps and coins. Ben Jabo has NO evidence he has ANY relationship to those DARK SKINNED people living there long ago except his say so. If that is the standard, well, then, I am King Tut's long lost niece and therefore I am entitled to bring all my homies from all over the world and take over Egypt where my people once lived. How do you think that would fly? That is really the weakest argument. They should just fess up and say 'nobody wants us and we have been thrown out from other countries for the bad behavior of our brethren and now we would like to live here in peace'---they would be respected more for truth than BS. Then come the threats--if you don't bomb Iran for us, we will, and if anybody objects we will nuke em. If you don't like our trouncing the neighbors, you are antisemitic. If countries complain about, they are Nazi's. Let's kill all the Arabs. Why? Because they we want land and they object. Regards.
Israel WAS behind it's borders on 5/15/48,when the Arabs attacked, they lost the 1948---That resulted in the Rhodes Armistice Agreement, which the Arabs violated when Nasser closed the Suez to Irael shipping in 1956, resulting in the '56 War, and the loss of more land by the Arabs---In 1967, Syria & Egypt attacked again--(If you wish, I'll post the entire sequence of events for your perusal) Once again, the Arabs lost---Then we proceed to the 1973 Yom Kippur sneak attack by Egypt & Syria, reminiscent of teh Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, where they lost once again---Get in through your noggin, Arabs just don't want Jews around no matter what the borders are---Don't forget, all you have to do is ask, I'll gladly sent your information from "Neutral Sources" that don't have any axe to grind---
Akram, you talk of "peace for peace", yet it seems you've never consulted the term even in the dictionary. Peace comes to the peaceful. Gunslingers meet their early retirement in boot hill. Rave on! The world knows the bellicose and the warmonger shamed by his all too revealing "security" fig leaf. For peace to come to Israel, Israel will have to accept dealing with its "security" from its own side of the 1967 borders. Stealing the neighbor's property on the pretext of "security" has worn too thin, and too small to serve any longer as a fig leaf to cloak thievery.
"Where is the voice of Israel" Cipora Hear it Cipora from Chick . And join us with your Voice:Jordan is Palestine. Now is the time:"Not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" Regards.
Chick. Thank you for the statistics 'Jordan is Palestine' and there is NO other solution. Only fools believe on 13% of the land Israel can have a future ! I have been saying that even for my donkey. History is there to prove it. If the Government of Israel will ignore it, it is a Sin and will pay for it. Time the Government will say that with its Louder voice.
Kath. The age of the Children Intifatha has gone. Thank G-d. What Abass said in such a pomp and cermoney is what the World heard before from many loud mouths. As you said the counting from Zero really and trully started NOW. Israel must use the opportunity. Hamas declared War by words of mouth,only few weeks ago. Abass declared War by his 'demands'. Israel reply must be 'you want it ? Come and take it !. Only War can bring Peace. That is all there is in History. The Country that won many Wars will win the last War. Things has to go this way Kath, when one trying his luck with liers. And the Truth can only show its face when lies burst. Is that Wisdom ? May be.. If only Olmert burst..
Only He,who is peace gives peace!
Where does Abbas get off yapping about his "demands"? He's in no position to make any kind of demands,it should be the other way around. Israelis will no doubt shrug off the threat of a 3rd intifada,this is old hat to them..actually I thought the 2nd intifada was still ongoing. He makes demands that he knows cannot be accepted by Israel which indicates he prefers the status quo.
Allow me to tell you why---It is the land of our forefathers, dating back 5768 years by the Hebrew Calendar---All our prayers are directed to Jerusalem---Any Jew, regardless of nationality or country of origin is welcome in my home, to sleep in my bed and eat at my table--I, have at times, hosted war wounded for the weekend so they shouldn't be lonely in the hospital, of course they were ambulatory enough for me to bring them home--- Unlike the Arabs, we don't have inter-factional bloodletting---- Unlike the Arabs, we direct our prayers to Jerusalem, Arabs don't---Jerusalem is our Holiest place, to the Arabs it's of recent interest and they only direct their prayers to Mecca---These are the reassons we refer to it as "Ours"---
Whether or not it is clear to us, everything is unfolding according to GODS will, not ours. The Bible speaks of God hardening hearts and hiding things from peoples eyes so that His great plan works as HE wills. I think this is what is going on now, so have no fear! GOD is in control!
Do you have any actual statistics that you've compiled to justify your assertion???--Actually, I see an awful lot of pro-arab threats and distortions of historical fact--- I'm still waiting for anyone to supply a few items that I've requested, time and again--- Sites of Palestinian "TEL", ANCIENT COINS, ARTIFACTS.---The must be of Roman era in Palestine or before---Piles of donkey or camel dung aren't acceptable---Just maybe, YOU can let me know where to find the things I've been so desperately searching for---
So,why is the United States hosting this sellout in Annapolis?
Part Two: to infiltration from the East. Does anyone doubt such infiltration would not occur? Would the United States come to the aid of Israel should it again be invaded? Probably not since that might hurt our "image" in the Arab world. Infidel Israelis, Americans and Europeans will not dissuade those sworn to destroy Israel. President Bush had promised former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon he could expect U.S. support to maintain defensible borders. In the plan now being discussed, Israel's borders would be indefensible. In all of this, the United States is trying to prop up Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. But Abbas is a figurehead, manipulated by the terrorist organization Hamas, which virtually controls the Palestinian territories thanks to democratic elections. Caroline Glick writes in the Jerusalem Post: "Over the past week, Abbas announced his adherence to maximal Palestinian demands from Israel. These include the full transfer of sovereignty over the Temple Mount to the Palestinians; the complete surrender of Judea and Samaria to the Palestinians; and an Israeli acceptance of the so-called 'right-of-return' that would force Israel to accept millions of foreign Arabs as immigrants within its truncated borders." Why should anyone expect anything else when the real intensions of Israel's enemies can be summed up in the "phased plan" for the destruction of Israel expressed in 2000 by Palestinian Minister of Supply, Abd El Aziz Shahian: "The Palestinian people accepted the Oslo agreements as a first step and not as a permanent arrangement, based on the premise that the war and struggle on the ground is more efficient than a struggle from a distant land ? for the Palestinian people will continue the revolution until they achieve the goals of the '65 revolution." The "'65 Revolution" refers to the founding of the PLO and the publication of the Palestinian Charter, which calls for the destruction of Israel through armed struggle.
There is a saying in the Talmud, "Tifasta meruba,lo tifasta, tifasta me'at, tifasta." That's what we should tell Abbas. If you want it all, you'll get nothing. If you want to compomise, maybe you'll get something.
SELLING ISRAEL DOWN THE RIVER. Paraphrazing by Cal Thomas: That's why next month's announced "Middle East Summit" in Annapolis, Md., should be viewed as one more installment payment in the sellout of Israel and of American interests in the Middle East. While the United States continues to struggle to shore up democracy in Iraq, the Bush administration ? like administrations before it ? proceeds in undermining the likelihood that the region's first democracy will endure. At every negotiating session, Israel is pressured into making concessions for "peace" and receives more war in response. Mostly this is because of the wishful thinking in the West that has replaced sound policy. Why should the Palestinians make concessions when they are drawing closer to their objective of eradicating Israel by throwing stones and bombs and stonewalling negotiations? In an address to the Israeli Knesset, President Shimon Peres reaffirmed the flaw in Western thinking: "?even if there are some who express doubt at the ability of the Palestinians to achieve peace, the impression must not be created that Israel has doubts regarding the need and the willingness to achieve full peace." So it's not about hard bargaining resulting in the preservation of Israel with defensible borders and the cessation of terrorist attacks, it's about "impressions"? No wonder Israel's enemies are emboldened as never before. While details of a "joint declaration" by Israel and the Palestinians on a final status agreement remain secret, some information has leaked. One report has Prime Minister Ehud Olmert preparing to divide Jerusalem by allowing Arab East Jerusalem to come under Palestinian control. The holy sites, now administered by Israel and open to all (which was not the case when Jordan controlled East Jerusalem prior to 1967), would be internationalized. For 40 years, Israel has provided security for the holy places. It is doubtful an international force would do as good a job protecting these sites from terrorists (think the Taliban and the destruction of ancient Buddhist statues in Afghanistan and regular attacks on Christians, their churches and schools in heavily Muslim nations). According to one report, "the drafters are planning to call for a withdrawal by Israel to the 1967 lines," thus making Israel more vulnerable than ever to heavily armed Arab states and Palestinian enemies and leaving it completely exposed.
Like it or not, most Americans don't read Haaretz or other mideast news sources. They read AP or McClatchy or NYT, or other US sources and form their opinions based on those sources.
Have we done with this article which at the end of the day Abu Mazen the "mouse"will get nothing out from Olmert,and ssmae old,story. The latest on the BBC was that now Haniyeh is deciding to embrace Abass.As if this was not premeditated owing to the oncoming convocation in the US.If the palis think that Israel,or their citizens will accept such ridiculous demand(DEMAND NO LESS)Hurrrumph! they will still have to begin to count from zero and never even reach number one. The objective is so much not as the asking that I find offensive,coming from the everlasting BEGGAR TOO...
"Abass lays out first " Kath. What do you expect ? When Olmert is always fast asleep. Time for others to wake up. Or we end up all waking up in Palestine.
Haven't seen the Ziff book. Khalidi quote is p. 28 of his _Palestinian Identity: The Construction of Modern National Consciousness_ (New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1997). Said by most accounts brilliant, but an English professor, and not judged by adherence to truth. They're more praised for creativity and persuasiveness. Same with other fields like psychology. Even poli sci seems less fussy about facts. By contrast physicists and historians, like Khalidi, receive more pressure to stick with objective truth. King Hussein of Jordan excused Nasser in 1967 saying everyone should know he hadn't meant all those dire threats. Saddam's Info Minister was notorious. Imams used to regularly deny Jews had anything to do w/Temple Mount. In ME perhaps expectation of truth is different.
Lynn. But He already have one Dead Zone in Gazza !! How many 'Dead Zones' does Abass needs ? I suggest that he goes to the Zone of the living in Jordan.
Here is one recent non-abusive post from a pro-Palestinian poster: "clearly you are a very uneducated, unread, illiterate, true-believing and, even worse, American dolt...." (posted by Hannah, 09/10/07). But I guess Silvienne has just missed Hannah's posts in this vein for, oh, how long now?
There is no point to answering you. Just keep in mind that the issue was about illegals. The question of legal residents did not come up. Honestly, I have no idea why the average person would want to move to Gaza, but tat is an entirely different issue. p.s. I am not all others, but you consder very many to be fools--nearly all others.
You worry about one or two roads beween the West Bank and the Gaza Strip carving Israel into pieces. I presume that anyone who worries about that is equally upset about the many roads, fences and checkpoints that are carving the West Bank into many more and much smaller pieces.
"The more you read these threads, the more you`ll notice that the pro-Palestinian posters really don`t write very much abuse, threats, or namecalling." It's the old master-slave thing where one group claims supremacy over another group and treats them like their nothing. This time when the slaves rose up they were met with attack helicopters instead of nooses.
There is NO WAY!
I can only repeat Sandman's message to you: "and how do explain How the Vietamese communists countinue today a policy of neo-colonization nibblling away at Cambodia by annexing sizable portions of its border, costlines and islands through illegitimate treaties with their puppet regime in Phnnom Penh. Their latest method is a "development Triangle" scheme that involves flooding three northeastern provinces of Cambodia and three southeastern prvinces of Loas with Vietnamease settlers. Nor that Vietnamese army has established coffee, cashew and rubber plantations in the Laotian provinces- the latter vovering more than 7,000 hectares. China and Tibet, Russia and the occupation of 3 Japanesse islands, Indosesia and Boreno, and and and But Jim knows "its no longer the rule " victors to retain land. What nonsense there JIMBO
You're remarkably simple minded. Why do you write CT as your place of residence when you come from Britain? Same sort of reason and explanation for me.
Your lists of the crimes of Israel are hearsay. Most of them can be disputed. If you're a man of conscience you should blush to believe undocumented lies. Meanwhile the crimes of the Palestinians are clear for all to see. Their main crime is the continued violence, which feeds the state of war. Part of you knows that as well as I do. But you flip flip flip and you write with whichever of your Jekyll/Hyde character is currently uppermost.
You have to read authentic Mideast News from Israel to get the proper perspective and what Palestinians are insisting upon now is becoming a 'bottomless barrel of goodwill gestures'. Ahmad Querei or Abu Mazen is known through his Book as a 'Holocaust Denier' and if one can believe in his change of heart is quite another thing. Apart from that he is obviously too weak for HAMAS who is waiting patiently in the wings. However, the truth is that the Palestinians, who as you must know are simply Arabs, have their undisputed Goal of the final 'destruction of the State of Israel'in mind and Israeli Leaders have to watch out for those many goodwill gestures which may ultimately become an unwarranted and dangerous gamble. Be aware that Palestinians want the Whole Area for their New State of Islamic Palestine and this is only the First Step towards gaining their ambition.
Not very much abuse or name-calling from pro-Palestinian posters? Liar. Try Hannah (whose posts you have already seen many times), for starters.
Indy does quite well too. I'd put click in that category too and how about Mark Lincoln calling Israel 'The Master race'. Perhaps you think they are all telling the truth and so you discount their diatribes.
I don't know where you get this 'supposed' figure of 50% but I'll go with you. In 1922 we were promised PALESTINE as our homeland by the British. They gave a huge hunk of it to the Arabs, calling it Transjordan --in payment for the tribes helping them in World War two, making the biggest contributor the King. Quite some kickback, wouldn't you say? What is left is much less than the fifty percent you spoke of and the Arabs still want their cut of that. So who is being GREEDY?
A way needs to be found for both peoples to live side by side in peace. Abbas and Olmert both know this, and that Abbas' "demand" is just his opening bid. You can be sure Olmert already has a counter-offer in hand. These negociations are going to be long, hard and emotional for everyone. They shall require compromises which will enrage extremists on both sides. But it's better than unending war, tears and bloodshed. Get used to the give-and-take, so that one day we can all say: Shalom. Salaam.
Good Point Guido. The cost of starting numerous wars IS priceless and thats the Palestinian cost. Then again perhaps we can arrive at a cost for each suicide bomber e.g. 10 square kilometers per attempt and 100 square kilometer per killing. By the way when is France going to give back the pacific islands to the original inhabitants? When will France stop being a colonist? What price did France pay?
Do u have some sort of a jasmine fixation you nincompoop (oops, that's so English). You've been angling for a bite with her across several forums on haaretz. Mate, is this some macho fantasy played out for ha'aretz readers (that's so Australian)? Many people speak and write like many others, man. Chill out (that's so American). Besides, u from London, Connecticut? Dill (english again). Is the bulb beginning to glow yet, Silvienne????
theres already a Zionist state its called America
Indeed, you are absolutely correct, Everyone who is less knowledgable in History should read your Post 164 and to know the TRUTH. PRE 70 AD BORDERS ARE ISRAEL'S UNDISPUTED AND AUTHENTIC BORDERS and not what the people are striving to say. The Palestinians who are Arabs can go back to where they belong in the 'Never Never Land' of the Desert where they actually belong as their very conduct today speaks for itself.
What the Palestinians are proposing doesn't look al that bad from press reports in the US. I guess it depends on how it is being expressed. FROM AP Palestinians open to possible land swap ABU DIS, West Bank - The Palestinians are ready to yield parts of the West Bank to Israel if compensated with an equal amount of Israeli territory, the lead Palestinian negotiator told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday. Ahmed Qureia, a former prime minister who has dealt with five Israeli prime ministers during 14 years of failed peacemaking, is trying again with No. 6, Ehud Olmert. (more) The link - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_22;_ylt=AhiX1E0MWJCs18QSRFevRFYUvioA
You are not listening, Joshua. Conquer and keep used to be the rule. But no longer. People the world over are demanding that governments change that attitude. It is a consequence of the rise of the third world. So a government like Burma stomps on its people. And people the world over scream bloody murder. They can no longer hide behind good intentions/propaganda with the internet watching. Hear O Israel....
But there is a flaw in this proposal: SY: "I propose, as a pre-condition to holding any negotiations at all, that the Palestinians commit to five years of no violence." The problem is, of course, that the Isreali settlers will see exactly where their priority lies, because at the end of that 5-year grace period their little "happy time" will end. So what is THEIR incentive going to be during that grace period, Scharker? It is - surely - to grab, and then grab some more, because they can't loose no matter how the Pals respond: 1) The Pals do nothing, in which case the settlers will be bloated with land and wealth when the 5-year grace period ends or 2) The Pals respond, in which case the 5-years-delayed talks get pushed out ANOTHER 5 years, and then ANOTHER, and then ANOTHER. Either way the Pals will end up with nothing. So why should they do nothing? They may as well go down swinging than go down without a fight. Wouldn't you?
Israeli Guy, ignore Jasmine Murphy...she says she's an Israeli yet there she is living in my hometown of London! Time she went home!
"believe me if peace of the whole country depends on a few settlements these pious people would be the first to give up their homes willingly" Because it certainly doesn't look like it, does it, with new outposts being built...
"I`m not a vampire, just an ordinary Israeli monster" Why aren't you living in Israel, then? You're always referring to "our" this and that, shouldn't you be at home?
stop pretending. Nobody is taken in by your kind of rubbish. you`re no Israeli. Why do you always refer to "our" children and "our" land when you don't live in Israel? I'm from London and you use British slang. So you're not taking anyone in with your load of bollocks either, now are you?
Greetings, Bro Antony Dr(Rev) Timothy Tow is my Pastor and the Principal of Far Eastern Bible College, Dr (Rev) Koshy is our lecturer cum pastor of another BP Church. I (sincerely) very happy to meet you, very thrill to meet Messianic Jew. No gentile will understand the extreme joy of a Jew who found his Messiah that he and his people had been waiting for 2 Millenniums. Once a BS leader told us, that when a jew found his Christ, he will be even more fervent than we proud gentile who thought that we are 2nd or 3rd generation Christians. And this messianic jew will love Christ unto death, his zeal will be beyond us. Many people think that evangelicals “worship” jews, actually we simply acknowledge you are still a peculiar people in the L-RD’s heart, an apple of his eyes, a royal diadem (Isa62:3). If G-D’s willing, next year I may be going to Israel with Pastor, which church are you in? you must have a hard time been a Christian there, Baruch HaShem Adonai!
"Palestinians are branded the terrorists, but I have heard more racism and threats in this thread from Israeli citizens than I ever heard from the other side" The more you read these threads, the more you'll notice that the pro-Palestinian posters really don't write very much abuse, threats, or namecalling. Regards
You are a victim of unrelenting propaganda purchased and paid for by the oil monies unconscionably obtained by holding the whole industrialized world hostage! It would definitely be helpful for you to go back to the history books (legitimate ones) and learn about who occupied this land, legitimately!Palestine was a name conferred upon it by the ancient brutal Roman occupiers. Before them it was variously known as Canaan, Judea, Samaria. After the Roman occupation, there were Palestinian Jews and Arabs. The land was stolen FROM the Jews and they bought much of it back at VERY STEEP PRICES!
I'm a Christian,but we don't force anybody to believe in Jesus.I think you're confused with the spanish inquisition and the crusaders-they persecuted the real christians also[they're called heretics].we christian fundamentalists are not many either.I think you're talking about roman catholics.we're different from them.I was raised a catholic,but not anymore.
Hello, Peter! Long time no talk! I have it on good authority (in Israel) that a group of Israelis AND Palestinians are beginning to work together to get a petition going about peace. They are not politicians. They are just plain folk like you and me. Silent majority, huh? Well, maybe so. They don't represent anybody but themselves. But they are beginning to stir. And one of these days, governments will have to listen. These are the people who will bring about peace if anyone does. Best regards, Jim
sought for Palestinian state is consistent with previous media reports, eg. Peres stating earlier that a 100% fulfillment of land exchange was likely with border adjustments based on 1967 boundaries. But the most important statement of Abbas's was, " A border adjustment, on the basis of the same quality and the same amount, we have no objections." There's some flexibility here even before negotiations begin and this is very good.
Not so fast Chaim - don't get worked up. Maybe Olmert is not as much of a fool as you think. In politics leaders must sometimes say things they do not really believe or will have to act on. The situation with Israel is particularly onerous - never in history has a defeated belligerent set the agenda and made the demands that the palestinian arabs do. This only applies to the State of Israel, of course as far as the world is concerned..
Regarding those ancient wars, who said that you had it coming? I didn't. I said that it is time Israel learned an historic lesson: that religion and politics do not mix. Mixing religion and politics was the rule 3000 years ago. But no longer. The Muslem fundamentalists are still practising that principle. But when Israel advocates that the Lord of Hosts will lead her to victory, or that she has rights over a land which belonged to a kingdom which went defunct 3000 years ago, she is falling into the same rut. I want her to wake up and start WORKING for peace instead of just talking about it in the abstract. Let the Islamic fundamentalists have their narrow minded fundamentalism. Israel doesn't need it. She can do better! I expect her to do better! Someday she WILL do better! But, Sigh! How long will it take?
Somehow extra dunams, approximately 210, are needed by Abbas. He wants the dead zone between Israel and the West Bank. Bad idea!!!
Cipora. That reminds me of the voice of the Italians in the days of Garibaldi: "Who would lend me six pennies to buy a rope to hand the Pope instead of Garibaldi" The voice of the people is always the last voice People write history not leaders. That is how Israel survived. P.S My vision: Jordan is Palestine. Am-yesrael-hai.
terrorist acts against their govts, led by none other than ---- Yasssar Arafat! Don't believe me? Fine! you may choose to remain ignorant or just look up Black September when King Hussein of Jordan had to mass murder over 10,000 Arafat led Palestinians for their constant seiges to protect his country! During the 67 Arab, Israeli wars, Israel conquered Jordan! After the wars, Israel offered to return the West Bank & Gaza back to Jordan but the Jordanian govt. refused, as it would bring back the Palestinians! How relieved they were to just dump them on Israel to deal with! NOW THEY OCCUPY ISRAELS LAND! So what does Israel do? THEY MAKE PEACE OFFERINGS TO THE PALESTINIANS! Is there ANYONE who can deny this or the fact that NEVER has a single Arab nation even cared or dared to treat the Palestinians with such human diplomacy? never ever will you mr abbas or any of your prior murderous criminal thugs ever get a stitch of jewish land.take your mythological culture back to jordan!
Well I'd be very surprised if the United States suddenly decides to turn its back on Israel. Because what it comes down to, is that both political parties in the PA are both TERRORIST organizations, its just that one is willing to negotiate and one isn't. But they both have their militant wings, and they both have no problems shooting at Israelis or each other. So it would be really stupid of the US to suddenly decide to turn its back on the one state in the Middle East that actually protects US interests in the region, and turn to a nation that probably wouldn't mind seeing the USA destroyed. Remember, Palestinians were cheering and dancing in the streets on 9-11. So yeah, I'm pretty convinced that United States support of Israel at this point in time is pretty much a certainty, and won't change. So yeah, perhaps this possibility of the US not backing Israel in the United Nations could happen, and maybe Hamas might decide to recognize the Jewish state, but I highly doubt either one.
Abbas tried the'moderate' act. No more shows left for the Palestinians. Time for Israel to turn the table and tell the truth: The truth is lies dosn't pay. The truth is there is no land to give. The truth is land was already given. The truth is Jordan is the Palestinian land that was given in 1922. The truth is Israel can't pay for a Brtish imperialist 'game'. The truth is the Palestinians have no right to govern their own people. The truth is the International Community must feel sorry for the Palestinians and save them from their own rulers as they saved the Iraqi from Saddam. The truth is the Jewish roots in Israel are deep enough to wether all storms. The truth is time to stop rhetoric is now. The truth is Olmert has served his'dumb role' and time for him to bow & leave the show. The truth is Israel must vow Abass is the last Palestinians Actors. The truth is Israel needs a leader who can tell the truth and nothing but the truth andso help me G-d.
to Portray Abbas , AP quote " Abbas left the door open" and " Abbas would be willing " so to portray Arafat terror living legacy as flexible , And "Abbas offered" as if Abbas owns anything at all . As for AP quotin' Abbas claim " of full Israeli withdrawal from all territories captured in the 1967 Six-Day War." , Is twisting the UNSC 242 wording . And AP quote " His aides have said he has agreed in recent talks with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to exchange West Bank land Israel wants to keep in a final peace deal with an equal amount of Israeli land. " , While Olmert from the Kenesset podium during the winter opening session said not such a thing contrary to AP quoting Abbas aides or should i say Meretz/Beilin as Abbas aide , spokesman. AP quoting Haaretz quote from David Baker is correct , This AP report is nothing less than what Meretz/Beilin is always arab brainwashing Israel public opinion whenever , over any airwaves . AP may as well seek an interview with master disaster President Peres who'll say 'to get rid offf the territories' parroting arabs extortions , propaganda , braiwashing , Or better , an AP report as a 2007 rehersal of the Camp David 2000 Summit , All the above when Shin-Bet monitor Fatah double game insurgency in Judea with Samaria , Iran nuke threats looming and Arab League seeking mideast territorial unity , hegemony . And as a death blow to US Road Map , quassams still hit Sderot , And 4 police files against Olmert plus the upcoming Winograde final report , As if not enough , in exchange to keep their protectorat over Mideast arabs ,the US and Britain are selling weapons to Mideast arabs , and they both endorse Arab initiative wich is war with respite called peace to rest , rearm train and again wage war meanwhile persians and arabs keep the pressure by the daily arab urban terror attrition, Example of Egypt this so called 'moderate" US Ally empowering Hamas in Gaza . AP report , yeah right drugg to drowse , Annapolis shmapolis ,opening door to Global Jihad to set foot in the West Bank ,
If Israel, in her at most willing `give or take moods` had left the WB today, tell me Otto what would Israel do after the first rocket had landed in TA. How many dead on both sides would there have been to retake WB? So what amount of `give or take` with the best possible intentions on BOTH sides will accomplish or take care of, if Israel relies on the part of the society that not only can not prevent the simple rocket from being launched, but from the ideological & religious standpoint considered an enemy if it even tried? Please consider that I had given you a very small layer of my shpill to chew at, with at most primitive & common of the examples. The situation (& I of course) could get much more complicated than that.
Where have all the postings gone? Long time passing Where have all the postings gone? Long time ago Where have all the postings gone? Slowman ate them every one When will he ever quit? When will he ever quit? Where have all the censors gone? Long time passing Where have all the censors gone? Long time ago Where have all the censors gone? Gone to party every one When will they ever work? When will they ever work?
Of course something has to be given to Pals. I would insist on assisting them with anything that society requires & than some-after they become the world`s common society. And they will not become such society until radical Islam & Jew hate chapter, when the best & safest offer for Jew is to relocate to Alaska, is in control of the Arab street. And it can not be defeated until it is considered to be normal, righteous behavior, pride & honor of any past humiliations (& there were many) absolutely has to take place before any reconciliations will, & its ranks are constantly filled with so many new hate sermons & new Farfours. Show me the single historical fact when the hard core Arab world had willingly & happily committed acts of pure friendship or beneficial to the state of Israel? When do the people understand that any give or take, no matter how much wanted, envisioned or desired, without stable platform could lead to either nowhere or actually more damaging situations?
In a a new confidence-building gesture to Abbas, Israel agreed Wednesday to grant residency permits to thousands of Palestinians who have been living illegally in the West Bank on expired visitors' visas. Great--ha ha ha--why not give him all of Israel-that'll make him really confident!
... but on Earth, I am afraid, the picture is entirely different. "Israel however did not grant official residency status to another 1,500 Palestinians residing illegally in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. "After Israel had declared the Gaza Strip as a hostile entity, it decided to postpone any decision regarding its [illegal] citizens"." - Tosefta (quoting Haaretz) An Earthling would conclude that LEGAL residents (such as new-born Gaza babies) ARE granted residency by Israel. Our Martian Resident does not get it. "The question is why should Israel grant such papers to Gazans, especially "illegals," when there is no Israeli authority in Gaza to grant such papers..Israel has no obligation to grant papers to illegals, as no other country does." - CJ Cone You have to start from facts, that Israel does have the authority and uses it. Then theorize. Not theories, and then looking for some facts that fit and ignoring those that don't fit. "Tosefta, you really think all are fools" - CJ Cone Really, Cipora. You are not everybody. Not everybody is from Mars with a profound inability to understand Earthly reality.
If a full withdrawal from the land captured by Israel in 1967 would be the outcome, then it is absurd to negotiate with the Palestinians only; and not isolating Syria while taking the Beirut Platform of the Arab League from 2002 as a frame and make peace with each and every Arab state. Talks with the Palestinians only and directly are worthwhile if there is a land swap, and not a dismantlement of the Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem and Male Adumim. If that's the price, then take Beirut 2002 and full normalization as the frame.
Mr Lincoln. "Abbs is trying to position his "demands" where Hamas stand" Mark Lincoln Where your post 155# stand from your other posts calling Abass a 'desent man' ? Unless Abass a Hamas spy or his days are numbered. The Palestinians tried their acts in all plots. Now the plot of the naked truth. Will you do the same Mr Lincoln ? No one can servive lies.
Avraham, have you forgotten that you cant get a permit to buy a gun? You cant carry a gun for self-defence unless you live in Judea or Samaria/ are a taxi driver/have an army rank of at least Major General (aluf) or have a jewellery shop. Even regular army officers with years of professional experience can no longer get a gun permit. On the other hand, nearly all the Palestinians have weapons. Most families try to buy an M-16 for about 70,000 shekels. Others make do with Kalachnikovs. Even their children 12-13 upwards have rifles. For them its more important than buying food.
That would be fine if the Arab nations return the lives of Isrealis that were killed when Arabs invaded Israel en-mass............!
Howdy Otto; The only way that a physical connection across 40 Km. of Israeli sovereign territory between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank would be possible would be with a tunnel buried below maximum tree-root depth (about 10 m.). Any other option would pose too great of a security risk and allow any two-bit terrorist to infiltrate into Israel proper with impunity. The conditions would be: 1) Israel retains sovereignty over the passage, 2) The PA or its benefactors pay for the construction, maintenance, and operating costs of the tunnel, and 3) the tunnel is rigged for demolition if one single terrorist, weapon, or piece of contraband transits it. If those conditions are unacceptable, then the Palestinians can go around through Egypt and Jordan.
Ben Yabo, Julius Romanof - neighbors: you're cool! Good stuff. BUT: 316 comments offering talk, talk, talk. Do we feel better now having pointed out how abysmal this situation and its participants are? No one has indicated here or in the wider press any intent to organize a (peaceful) public demonstration against the planned decimation of our Land. In a country characterized by so many strikes and public outcries about other issues, this is truly extraordinary - and frustrating. We can blahblahblah from here in the kingdom of Bushwack, but only you in Israel can vote with your feet with our support. Oh yeah, no one has the answer to my earlier question about a class-action suit. Well, I think the answer is that you have to be able to prove damages to all the members of the class. I suppose if Olmert/Abbas are successful in damaging all of us, Israeli and Diaspora, then there might be some interest in doing something about it. Then again, I guess not... 300+ more yadayadaya
I responded to your posting but obviously the Haaretz censor doesn't want anyone to read what I wrote to you. It was nothing libelous. Just the truth.
Tell your stupid stories to the marines. There are no such people called Arab Palis. The real Palestinians are the Jews. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
There are so many responses because of the sensitivity of this issue. There is nothing to worry about. Hashem is in control. Also, a big rabbi, a great rabbi in Israel said Moshiach is coming soon, right after Israel gives to the arabs downtown Bat Yam, eastern Ofakim and western Modi in. This great rabbis name is Rabbi Abbas, ab b b b bas
UOU AND I AGREE ABOUT MOST OF WHAT IS LAID OUT, BUT THE TERROR ATTACKS, AND ROCKETING HAS TO STOP -FOR THIS TO FLY. WOULD YOU AGREE?
Ibrahim, you are correct that there are exreme positions on both sides. Sharon, Rabin, Dayan, and many other Israeli greats realize that the Palestinians have rights. A Jew has no right to impose on a Palestinian that his home is Jordan. If Jews want the Arab world to accept the concept of Zionism, then Jews have to understand that the Palestinians exist and are entitled to independence and dignity. Israel must address the refugee and settlement issues. But my friend, majority of Jews are convinced that the Arabs/Islam/Moslems/Palestinians want the elimination of the Jewish State of Israel from the Middle East. The honor given to the suicide bomber confirms this. If Israel feels that every Arab want her destroyed, how can Israel make the necessary concessions to the Pals?
"If you don`t think that giving up Gaza was a step towards peace then it`s okay.' No Margie,giving up Gaza was about "demographics' Ie, having less Palestinians to deal with.My how stupid you can be sometimes.
No need to say more
Hi Tosefta, In your opinion who has now sovereignty over West Bank?
The Jews, of which you pretend to be one, weren't consulted either---The Partition Plan was to have been based on the Balfour Declaration, which the British bastardized when they gave away most of Palestine to the Emir Abdullah, who later became King Abdullah the first of TransJordan, which changed it's name to Jordan.---Brits paid off Abdullah for his not breaking their hump by not acting against them in The Great War---Before you talk, look at the maps of the British Mandate as it was given to Britain, and how they altered it to suit their needs---Check out Ottoman Empire Maps of the late 1800's, pre-mandate, mandate and post mandate--- You're bellyaching about Palestine, think Trans Jordan, that where the bulk is--
Because if Israel already knows the Palestinian demands, why are they building more Jewish only roads and settlements in the West Bank? They're looking to create facts on the ground so if both parties sit down, Israel can bargain and take more of the West Bank. This is why I believe the summit will fail. I have always agreed with Abbas's proposition, but I can see why groups like Hamas are laughing at him. Either he's blind, or he wants to carve his name in history books as the one who got the Palestinians their state. Sorry President Abbas, we need a viable state, not us being a weaker party at negotiation tables and taking scraps like dogs. Oh well, OFF TO THE ONE STATE SOLUTION.
Cowards the lot of you! Abass is a pimp,he demands?Wow! The mouse is asking the cat what he should eat? What a shame,he will just have to live with his Fatah folowers and rue the day,the sneaky Holocaust denier! Be certain to give him a bit of cheese and keep it the trap ready where he will fall and get caught.
... but on Earth, I am afraid, the picture is entirely different. "Israel however did not grant official residency status to another 1,500 Palestinians residing illegally in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. "After Israel had declared the Gaza Strip as a hostile entity, it decided to postpone any decision regarding its [illegal] citizens"." - Tosefta (quoting Haaretz) An Earthling would conclude that LEGAL residents (such as new-born Gaza babies) ARE granted residency by Israel. Our Martian Resident does not get it. "The question is why should Israel grant such papers to Gazans, especially "illegals," when there is no Israeli authority in Gaza to grant such papers..Israel has no obligation to grant papers to illegals, as no other country does." - CJ Cone You have to start from facts, that Israel does have the authority and uses it. Then theorize. Not theories, and then looking for some facts that fit and ignoring those that don't fit. "Tosefta, you really think all are fools" - CJ Cone Really, Cipora. You are not everybody. Not everybody is from Mars with a profound inability to understand Earthly reality.
Yes, let's start with 1982 Lebanon--Arfat's PLO was pulling cross border raids from the shelter of Lebanon---That's why the IDF went in, to clean them out--Lebanon harbored terrorists, and as such she was responsible for their actions--- All we have to do is going back to 1948, when the Arabs attacked Israel, in defiance of the UN Partition--If you wish, I'll be glad to supply plenty of "IMPARTIAL" information in support of that hard cold factm all you have to do is request it---It will be sent by return mail-- You might always want to check out Tel Hai, 1920, and Arab Riots of 1929 & 1936--
Jews always remained---Those that left, were taken as captives by the Romans--- Will you be good enough to point out any SINGLE TEL, PALESTINIAN COIN OR ARTIFACT THAT PROVES AN ARAB PRESENCE at the Time our Temple was destroyed.--It's a relatively simple request, surely with your expertise, you should be able to come up with something---
Palestinians willing to trade Land for Peace. The Palestinians are willing to trade a Promise of Peace for land of Israel. We have seen what what they do with land given to them. Gaza handed to the Arabs is now a training site for Terrorists, and a site from which to fire Kassam rockets into Israel. The Arabs need additional land in Judea & Samaria so that their rockets can land in parts of Israel which is currently beyond the range of their rockets. The Peace they offer is after the destruction of the State of Israel. When have Arab leaders fulfilled their responsibilities according to the proposed Road Plan for a 2 State Solution? Disarm the Terrorists of their weapons. It was a staged presentation in which old, unfit for use, rifles were turned in. It was done so that they could receive the promised cash bonus, and their name removed from the Wanted Terrorist list. They were now free to attack Israelis without fear of being arrested until they commita new offense-afree ride
Well, no Israeli had the balls to tell arafish, that phony pedophile, where to take a hike. And I assume correctly that little olmert has even less inclination to tell this jerk where to get off. At the Battle of the Bulge the germans demanded the surrender of the town and the U.S. commander, Gen. Mcauliffe eloquently responded, "Nuts!" Israelis would do well to study that.
Hi neighbor, I live in Bensalem---Now with that aside, until the investigations into Olmerts financial finaglings and his other underhanded endeavors, have been completed---He shouldn't be allowed to sign anything---The man has no shame---We can assume he's got a tidy nest egg tucked away someplace out of Israel---
if israel can have a right of return, then so can the rest of the world, thats if the rest of the world thinks this is acceptable, the americans can give back the land to the indians and so can canada, autralia can give the land back to the aborigines and so on, does that sound fair to all those in favour of the palestinian land takers and loud mouths ?
what he's DEMANDING is thatIsrael revert to the old "Greenline" of 1949, the 1949 Armistice positions---Which the Arabs violated in 1956, 1967 & 1973---That didn't work then and won't work now--- It's the old story, "Fool me once, shame on you, Fool me twice shame on me"---No more fooling around---
The people will pay the price when Olmert is gone..The security of Israel is no where in all so called 'Peace negotiations' ! Abass 'lays out' is just for grabbing land. There is nothing in it about the first item in Israel Agenda which is SECURITY. Abass is not qualified to guarantee Israel security. Next month in Annapolis Israel must make it clear that talk about Security must be the first item in any agenda. The Palestinians can not guarantee security for themselves, how they can guarantee security for Israel ? Abass must be striped naked in Annapolis. Abass must be turned; either asking asylum in Israel or like Czar before him face 'the night of the long knifes in Gaza'. Annapolis must be the moment of TRUTH for the Palestinians 'politics of lies'. When lies are pushed aside Peace can be negotiated and achieved. Now the Palestinians including Abass are still in the 'politcs of lies'.
Who are you threatening? What are you talking about? You are not Palestinian, you don't have to speak for them. If you really want fight, go in Israel and let's fight IDF.
Unfortunately it's not factually accurate. Ben Jabber: "Israel didn`t grab any territory---she conquered it after having been attacked time and again--- The Arabs decided they didn`t want their share of the Partition Plan and attacked Israel instead" You appear to have omitted the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian villages and the forced migration of thousands upon thousands of Palestinians from the homes they had occupied for centuries.
Nice to hear from you, Cipora, even though we may disagree. Nobody will argue with you about the security needs, and none of us knows what territory will b e offered to the Palestinians in lieu of the settlement blocks, but something has to be given. In any case, if your scenario of Jordan and Egypt does not work out(and I don't think that the two concerned countries are interested), some kind of passage between the West Bank and Gaza will be needed. There was talk about a tunnel or an elevated railroad, but something needs to be given. For Israel's security sake I would also oppose a land concession that would cut the country in two, but I believe that even today's unpopular government would not agree to it. I was glad to read in some other post of yours your support for peace with the Palestinians. I also liked your analysis of the fundamentalist Muslim groups.You showed real knowledge of the topic.
CJK: "The question is why should Israel grant such papers to Gazans, especially "illegals," when there is no Israeli authority in Gaza to grant such papers." The AUTHORITY does not have to be located inside the occupied territory; it simply has to exist. Do the Israelis *have* to supply a travel permit to anyone in Gaza who applies? No, of course not. Does this discretion to refuse such a request prove that Isreael *doesn't* have authority over travel permits? No, of course not. It proves the opposite; anyone who WANTS to leave Gaza needs authorization from the Israelis, and without that authorization the person ain't going nowhere. CJK: "Israel has no obligation to grant papers to illegals, as no other country does" Which proves that Israel has the AUTHORITY to grant those papers, and she EXERCISES that authority every time she says "Yes" or "No". Tosefta is right and you are, frankly, arguing Tosefta's case.
Palestinians.
at the map of the Partitioned of PALESTINE and then come back about irresponsibility. Israel Homeland was suppose to be 50% and today they've been allow to keep up to 78%, don't try to be too GREEDY. will you.
Mr Olmert is also right to say that Negociations should be between our two(Israelis/Palesrinians) parties, and I got the GOOD feelings that each one knows as how much to give and take from each other. They should take the courage to do a good deed for their respective constituents, and do it rather quick, as there is MOMENTUM in Peace presently,and we are definitely tired of this long standing conflict, so non of you two should miss this UNIQUE opportunity. Goodluck to both of you,sensible men. The prompt result of your hard work WILL make MILLIONS HAPPY people in ISRAEL and PALESTINE. Salaam/Shalom
Evident in this first foolish sentence: D: "I always thought that Palestinians demanding things from Israel was funny, I mean if you really think about it, Israel doesn`t have to give them anything." Oh, yes it does. It is dependent on US support to maintain this occupation, and without it Israel will face unbearable pressure to get out without ANY compensatory agreement with the Pals; the worst of all possible worlds for Israel, because it makes the last 40 years pointless. All the US has to do is stand on its hands in the UN SC and there would be NOTHING that Israel could do to prevent UN sanctions bringing her economy to its knees. You are like so many other zionists; you regard US support as unquestioned and unquestioning, and never ask wether there may be a limit to US patience. D: "I mean if you really think about it" Yeah, maybe you should actually try that one day, Drew.
I think first on the agenda must be security.If this can not be dealt with then we can go no further. Olmert is a very weak prime minister the faster he goes the better for Israel. Even Barak is better and he is an idiot.
I agree with you totally....unfortunately, it is very unlikely to happen that way! Radical Islam is basically very anti-semitic and is not going to lie down peacefully. The question is do you make "peace" with these people hoping that eventually the culture of hate will change or do you keep on with the constant to-ing and fro-ing of talks on then off, then violience and bloodshed, then talks again? I think you have to make peace with whomever will make peac with you and deal with the biggots as a seperate issue.
You have your history absolutely right. The early Zionists determined to have a Jewish state with as few Arabs as possible. It isn't hard to find the quotes of the founders of Israel which indicated that the land was to be for the exclusive use of the Jews. Harry Truman, not a Zionist, supported partition because as he said and I paraphrase, "I don't have a large group of Arabs to answer to." The US put pressure on third world countries in the UN to vote for the partition even as several of Truman's advisors cautioned that the partition would lead to major problems in the Middle East. Had the country been allowed to become a bi-national state we well might have the problems we have today.
But there is also the prefix 'honourable'. BTW have you read Abu Sitta's Atlas of Palestine.It is the most detailed, thorough,authentic account of the events of 1948,inEnglish.10 years in the making.Available in all university libraries(reference section).I also saw a moving piece by him 'In praise of Nabka'.Do a search under Sitta Abu and you'll find it in the first page of entries.
The offer to swap land as reported in the US press looks quite reasonable. I guess it is how you want to spin the story.
And ended up as an occupying power as a result. It can only EVER be an occupying power whilst the Palestinians refuse to sign any paper that says Israel can keep it. This article shows that even Abbas - the most compliant Palestinian negotiator Israel will EVERY get - simply will not sign such a document. So what does Israel do, Gilbert? Hunker down behind a wall that gives it a large chunk of the West Bank, and hunker down for the NEXT 40 years? Nothing changes; she will still be "occupying" that land without any legal title to it. Why not accept that reality, and agree to THIS demand of Abbas' if HE accepts that there will be only the most token Right of Return? Israel then gets something for nothing, because she is "giving up" something that doesn't even belong to her, and doing so in order to avoid taking back refugees that she is, indeed, obliged to take back. It's called "diplomacy". Israel really should try it one day.....
are making demands!
llan leave the superpower alone and don't accept its and outside money and weapons. We will be happy to leave Israel alone.
theirs! Hamil,arafat was bribed by israel,how else did he amass that fortune?But now israel is looking at a different player altogether& I don't mean the quisling abbas.Re:Mohamed,he only broke agreements when the other party first did so.In this context,it is israel who is keeping bad faith,both with the Palestinians and the UN !
Mitch you must be getting your facts from talk back radio. Israel has colonised more than three quarters of Palestine and has gerrymandered the rest into small prisons. Israel has no intention of making peace - the latest land seizure in the West Bank by the military is a pointer.
This story is also being reported in the US by AP. Of course the spin is totally different. AN EXAMPLE: HEADLINE: Palestinians open to possible land swap BODY: ABU DIS, West Bank - The Palestinians are ready to yield parts of the West Bank to Israel if compensated with an equal amount of Israeli territory, the lead Palestinian negotiator told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday. etc. The link - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians
The Zinosist have already colonised the land. A small corridor connecting Gaza and the West Bank - Israel could build a tunnel underneath it or bridges over it, or Abbbas could be allowed to build a tunnel connecting the regions - is not impossible. All this is mere diversion any way. Israel has demonstrated it does not want peace by bombing Syria and grabbing more land in the West Bank this week.
for a 'greater Israel.' It ain't gonna happen! Eventually, Jerusalem will come under international control, the Palestinian people will be no longer live under Israel's brutish occupation, and Zionist immigration to Israel will cease. Most if not all potential Jewish/Zionist immigrants to Israel, are already living peaceful happy lives in their country of origin.
If Abbas can`t deliver meaningful peace for a five year period, then why even talk to him about a "Land for peace" deal? Because outside of genuine, realistic peace on the ground there is `PC` peace, `morally correct` peace, `even fantasising about it helps because it gives impression that we care` peace, `vage attempts at peace that could be enough to be called peace on the way to our other goals behind it` peace. There are so many versions & explanations, you can grab several on any given day & be proud of your knowledge & reasoning.
Abbas does not represent thePalestinian people. Giving your land away to him is like giving your land to Santa Clause. Also, Israel must state up front, Jerusalem is and will never be on the table. There is only one Jerusalem;no East or West. King David and the Jewish people built this city;not Arabs.
Precise demands(demands mind you)! I said in one of my response which did not surface(if at all)is:The mouse is ordering the dinner for the "cat"hurramph! By the way Jacob,I think I'll skip the wine if you don't mind,and in the meantime concentrate on the salad...Bloody rubbish and an unbelievable nerve of Abu Mazen the "holocaust"denier. Let him first amend his thesis,stop his Fatah cohorts,the katyushas and the rest of the inconsequensial demand and go back to his drawing board and even then NO DEAL ESPECIALLY ON WHAT HE THINKS HE WILL GET?NOT THE DEMIZE OF OUR ISRAEL Abu Smazu!!
1967 'borders' never existed. That was a ceasefire line where the armies halted when a panicky world called to Israel to stop its advance in wars started by their greedy opponents. As a border it is totally indefensible and will only lead to more conflict.
e m Wworry not,we are not all foolish enough to fall into this category.Only the other whining ones perhaps who are not on our side of the camp.The whole article stinks and it is a big joke to even having to dicuss it here wasting our breath to this unacceptable notion....
Howdy Tosefta; The CIA World Factbook (which is pretty damned accurate) states that the total land area of the West Bank (as defined by the 1949 armistice line and which would include East Jerusalem) is 5,640 sq. Km. and that the land area of the Gaza Strip (as defined by the 1950 armistice line) is 360 sq. Km. for a combined total of exactly 6,000 sq. Km. It is highly unlikely that Abbas would be including the water area of the West Bank in the Dead Sea in his figure of 6,205 sq. Km. since that would amount to 220 sq. Km. and not 205 sq. Km. The Gaza Strip has no territorial waters since it is not (nor is a part of) a sovereign state. It looks like Abbas is referring to 205 sq. Km. of "no-man's land" which lie on the Israeli side of the Green Line and not on the "Arab" side of it. It doesn't make any difference anyway. There is nothing sacred about a temporary armistice line and those who try to change them into permanent borders without an agreement are the fools.
Joshua And the music plays on... I do not concider them our brothers nor our cousins thank you.They seem to think by sweet words our desires will be assuaged.It will definitely will not. Philosophy truncated or not and stopping at introspection which includes Israel's demize at their convenience is not on the cards thank you Ibrahim...
Sounds like an offer Israel can hardly afford to refuse.
Sado-macho Lakshmi? Getting pleasure from the threats?
Although I find myself agreeing with you on the facts more often than I do Jeff Northridge, I sometimes question my own judgement in this respect when I read your boorish and childish rants about "blockheads" and "stupid bores". Continuous ad hominem attacks as virulent as yours usually reflect nothing more than inarticulate rage. And why exactly do you expect other readers to accept your ex cathedra pronouncements as to who is/is not capable of understanding your wisdom? Make your arguments and let us decide as readers who is more convincing. Mr. Northridge may be right or wrong on particular issues, but in refraining (by and large) from responding to the personal insults that seem to pass as debate for you he certainly wins the maturity points by a long shot.
Very moving peace but why must the Arab Nations want the 1% that Israel is on. Just take your brethren to Jordan or Saudia and peace will ensue.But your Arab Muslim brethren kill you and enlave no less than what they intend for the Jews after "PEACE" comes.
The beggar knows and is asking the maximum and at the end will get just a KICK IN THE PANTS. The audacity of the man,and never changes with hissame demands and if Olmert is stupid enough then we'll know where he shove Abass and his cohorts at the first opportunity he gets. That is Olmert has any gumption before he squanders any further than he has done up till now.What fool Olmert is and I hope they throw him out without further ado....
I am with you on this. Do not let him/her intimidate you. You are aware that the symbol od Dan was the snake?
Not feeling too well today. I would think that you would be ecstatic with Abb(asses) pronouncements or did he burst your bubble by reiterating his and his predecessors well warn theme or as the Chinese would say (THEIR Salami Tactics). Be well aware that the Orthodox and settlers are not budging even one inch not for you, not for Elmer Fudd and especially not for Abb(ass) And MA CHERIE BLOW yourself. ......and please stop using a FEMALE name.Cobra or Viper would be more fitting
Speaking of handouts....110billion U.S.$ and still countingto israel.Next up an additional 30 billion in military aid.
First of all, it is completely unnecessary. There is no "safe passage" connecting US lower 48 with Alaska - PA doesn't need one either. Nor are the 2 disconnected parts of Oman joined by a "safe passage" (look at a map). Second, no UN resolution or any int'l law can/would require this; it was part of the mad (and discredited) fabtasy of Beilin and Peres; PA has no "right" to this at all. Third, only feasible route is through the sensitive Shikima watershed valley, protected, even Israel doesn't build there - environmental suits would tie any plans up in court for decades. Fourth, nearly impossible to dig a tunnel or deep sunked roadway through active aquifer like this - cost would be 10's of billions, plus billions/yr. more to remediate damage; nobody to pay, and elevated highway cost is more prohibitive. Lastly, its never going to happen with Hamas in control of Gaza, and they are there to stay. PA has ZERO ability to deliver on Land-for-Peace. No PA state, no "passage".
Never heard of such a stupid idea as to cut our country in half,WHAT? I think time has come for Olmert to go join his son and daughter in the US and leave a better P.M to do a decent job before we go a wondering over yonder.What a silly proposition and i was not surprised when I just came and by just reading the headline was enough for me to form an opinion and just hope the Jewish population will rid themselves of this puppet called Olmert,and the sooner the better..
If no one in the Israeli government sees the behavior of Olmert and Ramon as treasonous, subject to impeachment, what is the possibility of a class-action lawsuit against them by Israel-loving Jews in Israel and the Diaspora? There has got to be a way to get the public to stop yakking their heads off for the purpose of showing how "smart" they are and DO SOMETHING to fix this mess -- before it's too late! Yeah, my body is here, but my heart is over there. And when I come back to Israel next spring, I want to speak Hebrew, not Arabic.
NOW THAT IS REAL CUTE.admonishing one of your own SS members.WOW. And we even ceased to be Land Thieves. All with one declaration by you. Are you starting to get scared that Elmer Fudd may actually give Israel away and you will be sent packing back to the States by your Arab "friends". Do not worry it aint gonna happen.
I have noticed you had been chastising the Arab world for not exposing Israel enough. That is not entirely so. They had been playing the same game with Abbas & Pals, they had played 7 years ago with Arafat. Using the chance of US President, at the end of term preoccupied with the historical attempt of reshaping ME, to lean on Israel & `bite the bait`, than `pool the bait` back at the last moment & hang Israel high & dry with the label of `preclusionists` to peace. The problem is not the effort on their part, but the desired effect of the past had not been there, because firstly the card had been played before & generally the entire game of sacrificing Pals to combat Israel had been going on for so long. More so, the world wide pro Israeli forces had also increased & treating the `game` differently, not allowing it to be played so freely. Overall the lack of desired, expedited effect simply makes an impression on the very impatient Israeli haters & basher that it is abandoned. Not so.
From column B. Meanwhile, if you could bring the soup and salad of the day while I look at a whine list. Public procamations of demands are all well and good, but have no real substance till the parties sit down at the table for real negoations. Abu Mazen, leader of the Palestinians, is there to represent his constituancy, hence his maximalist demands. Of course, missing from any of his commentary are the responsibilities he plans on pushing and offering to Israel. Again, not a surprise, nor a big deal. The supposed 'UN backed claims' are just more boilerplate rhetoric, which are held up as holy writ or worthless depending on POV. But at the end of the day, the negotations and whatever paper filings are filed, are meaningless if there is continued violence. Preening and primping for the cameras is nice, but won't bring forth a realistic agreement if Qassams continue to fly at Sderot and suicide bombers wait with jackets ready for the next round.
Palestinians are branded the terrorists, but I have heard more racism and threats in this thread from Israeli citizens than I ever heard from the other side.
Thank you for the invitation but that is not my lifestyle and I am also married so my wife would not approve. Keep dreaming anyways.
Well Jasmine I hope we throw out Olmert if he adheres to this foolish idea and the sooner we get rid him the better for Israel. I hope the citizens are not going to fall into this precipice for which they will surely die.
Intelligent people understand cause and effect. Israeli occupation and oppression is in a large part responsible for the rise in Islamic Extremism. The Israel occupation has used oppression, violence and state sponsored terror against Muslims and Christians for 60 years to advance its expansion. Tenacious love, peace and serious honest negotiation is the only solution. IB in Christ
Every day I see that things are getting worse. For the government of Israel to even lend an ear to what Abbas has to say,let alone demand,is absurdity at its highest level. This excuse for a human being,this man that was the architect of the Munich Massacre,this man that wrote his doctorate on the fact that The Holocaust was a myth..this inept little creature who cannot even keep Gaza under control is going to demand from Israel. And the most absurd part is that Israel is dealing with him..Have they lost their minds..is Olmert in such a hurry to get a Noble Peace Prize and then run to Paris? Maybe someone can tell me...since when does the victor take orders from the loser? Since when do the victors return "all"to the losers? Are we going to have to start over again with the palestinians because we all know in our heart they will not be satisfied until all of the Jews are gone.Remember the brave soldiers who gave their lives for the liberation of Jerusalem? They must be crying in heaven
Suppose abbas goes on a search and destroy against hamas, lets say he kills 5000 of them, and someone asks him what he expects to get for this , what is his answer??? The point being, once there is an agreement then he has something to hit the freaks over the head with,ubtill then he would look like a collaborator and would only weakne his capacity to act.Also even with an agreement implementation can be dependant upon disarming the gangs, but their is no impediment to an agreement per sea.You are putting the cart before the horse.
Those words are very hate filled. You paint with a broad brush. Educate yourself about the realities in the Holy Land, and don't believe everything you see in the news, some is true, some is not, and a lot is deceptive. IB in Christ
Command all strangers to live at peace under Israel's sovereignty or leave for Jordan , Iran or Saudi Arabia . CEASE BEING UN,UK,EU,RUSSIAN,CHINA,USA,ISLAMIC NATIONS , SACRIFICIAL LAMB AND WHIPPING BOY FOR ARAB/ISLAMIC OIL . STOP PLAYING GAMES WITH ISLAMIC TERRORIST MURDERERS WHOSE CONSTITUTIONS DEMAND THE ANNIHILATION OF THE jEWISH PEOPLE . G-D AND HIS WORD WILL NOT CONDONE THIS TREASON , TREACHERY , ABOMINATION OF GIVING AWAY HIS LAND INHERITANCE AND ALLOWING A MOON god IDOLATROUS STATE TO BE FORMED ON G-D AND HIS WORD'S LAND . THIS IS A PRELUDE TO THE JUDGEMENT OF THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH . MAY G-D AND HIS WORD SHOW MERCY IN JUDGEMENT .
Okay folks, is it possible for anybody to be as thick as lakshmi or is it a contrived act???? I mean this one even has the neo-revisionists running for cover to keep a distance. I think ha'aretz should establish a poll on it lol.
Well at least your end game remains normal, I was starting to wonder given the growing hysteria of your posts.Heres a hint, support abbas 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% he is the only way.
We are talking about taba-geneva.lets get on with it already, everybody knows what the deal is.
POOR OVI... BECAUSE OF YOUR KIND OF QUITERS, THE 6 MILLION WALKED IN TO THE GAS CHAMBERS LIKE LAMBS! BUT THAT WAS YESTERYEAR. IF THE 1.5B MUSLIMS DECIDES ON WAR, THEY'LL WIN, BUT NOT MANY WILL SURVIVE TO ENJOY "VICTORY".
... but on Earth, I am afraid, the picture is entirely different. "Israel however did not grant official residency status to another 1,500 Palestinians residing illegally in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. "After Israel had declared the Gaza Strip as a hostile entity, it decided to postpone any decision regarding its [illegal] citizens"." - Tosefta (quoting Haaretz) An Earthling would conclude that LEGAL residents (such as new-born Gaza babies) ARE granted residency by Israel. Our Martian Resident does not get it. "The question is why should Israel grant such papers to Gazans, especially "illegals," when there is no Israeli authority in Gaza to grant such papers..Israel has no obligation to grant papers to illegals, as no other country does." - CJ Cone You have to start from facts, that Israel does have the authority and uses it. Then theorize. Not theories, and then looking for some facts that fit and ignoring those that don't fit. "Tosefta, you really think all are fools" - CJ Cone Really, Cipora. You are not everybody. Not everybody is from Mars with a profound inability to understand Earthly reality
Howdy Tosefta; The date for the last update to the CIA World Factbook page for the West Bank is given as 10/4/07, but the figure of 220 sq. Km. for the West Bank's water area in the Dead Sea could be several years old. What difference would it make anyway? If the Dead Sea is shrinking, then the water area would simply shift to the land-area column. If Abbas doesn't care about the difference between water and land area, then why doesn't Israel just dangle the prospect of the Gaza Strip being entitled to a 12-nautical-mile territorial limit into the Mediterranian Sea after statehood in exchange for a smaller amount of land in the seamline area? 1 nm = 1.852 Km. and the coastline of the GS is about 40 Km. long so the water area would be about 890 sq. Km. That is twice as big as the 451 sq. Km. in the seamline area. My fields are home construction, animal husbandry, military history, and mathematics which, of course, have nothing to do with reality, now do they?
A legalistic version to establish a country is only worth the paper it is written on. It is the blood and guts of the people that count. IF the Palestinians want to fight the Israelis, man to man (human to human), so be it. The rest of you keep your freaking hands off. The winner gets the land. I don't think that would be very acceptable to the peace-loving Palestinians. They either become a murdering bomber, or let others fight their battles, at least if you watch the history of the last 150 years or so.
i do hope lakshmi that one day you wake up from the comotose, braindead state you'r in. and then you'll find yourself in la la land, because israel be still there, and your pal brothers will still foam in the mouth, living in their "antifada" dream world! can't you see, they can't even "govern" a sliver of a land, let alone a "pal country".... but... you can still dream on in your stupor! ISRAEL IS FOR EVER, AS IT IS THE WISH OF THE REAL G O D!!!
if israel cannot go back to the 181 Partition Line and accept what was given to them(at the time they were happy to get that,became greedy after that!) then harsher measures may be the only solution,as some posters on this thread have already suggested.israel's admission to the UN was premised on their acceptance both of 181 & 194.
And there is lot of those foolish people in this talk back
Your truncated philosophies stop at the point of introspection that only includes a realization that what others are doing is not in your benefit. Of course, you seem to forget that for you to consider something beneficial is only if all Jews are rubbed out, along with the State of Israel and anyone else you believe does not support your selfish goals. Do not call us your brothers and sisters, because the relationship is estranged when you write the words you do.
Only a short-sighted person would look at a situation that does not give your country security, and accept it. Only a strong people will improve their security, and doing so against those who attacked them is the correct, ethical and right approach. You say the Palestinians were peaceful. Well, they did decide to leave the land at the behest of Jordan, Syria, Egypt and the other Arab powers of the Mideast. It would behoove those countries to accept ALL of the Palestinians into the borders, permanently, and abolish those gulags they have forced them to stay in. Most countries fight wars of protection, and do what they must. Those who say the USA created the jihad haven't got their head screwed on. Long before the attack against the Taliban, the jihad was active. Resisting agiainst aggression will always result in a recruiting situation, until there is a clear-cut winner, or until there is an agreement between two willing countries wanting peace.
"Where did the extra 205 sq. Km. come from? Abbas must be adding in the no-man`s land areas. Wow, he really tries to push things over the cliff by making excessive demands.. Whose sovereignty? The futuristic Islamic Republic of Palestine is not a nation yet and it certainly had no sovereignty over anything prior to 1967." - Jeff N Jeff, you are too gifted for me in your boundless blockheadedness. So I will explain things veeeery cleeearly, I hope, and then let you sink. If the no-man's land is to the east of the Green Line, does Abbas requiring it makes less sense or more sense than requiring any other area in the "disputed" West Bank? (a) More sense. (b) Less sense. (c) More or less the same sense. (d) More is less and less is more Hover through the fog you stupid bore.
You are absolutely right. The Zionist accepted the UN Partiton Plan because it fit with the goal articulated at the first Zionist Congress. (...to establish a Jewish Homeland recognized in law) Rather than continue UN sponsored negotiations and accept the reasonableness of a federal/binational state, the Zionists used their influence (re: US. Europe), to get the desired result. No other middle eastern state voted for Partition. From 1897 onwards, the Zionist employed all manner of scheming, influence peddling, and money to position themselves for Paritioning. While the Zionist have always claimed 'self-defence', it must be understood that although disguised in diplomacy their initial goal was inherently offensive, aggressive and ultimately required violence to achieve the necessary ends of replacing the Mandate population with a Jewish majority. Where murder was required, (ie., Count Bernodatte), the Zionists always hide behind the mantra of false apologies and the cloud of war.
If Abbas can't deliver meaningful peace for a five year period, then why even talk to him about a "Land for peace" deal? As far as Israeli actions, thats a different item. Why don't we see how Israel reacts to five years of no violence from the Palestinians? Give it a try, its never been attemted before. My guess is that you would be pleased by the Israeli reaction.
Jim, Using your incredible logic, every culture, society or nation that ever took over land from someone else should give it back. In Europe, all those who are directly descended from the Celts should be given all of the land they grabbed when their forefathers killed and enslaved to Celts. All of the Americas should be vacated by the current people who live there. For they didn't 'own' that land when they moved in. The Indians should vacate the land because it was all 'owned' by the Spirit of Mother Nature and the animals roamed their territories that they 'owned.' Don't be a simpleton.
as 'photo opportunity' unsubstantial partner . Abbas dictations , example of a precise number for the amount of land he is seeking is not backed up by UN for it would be seen as disregarding "Israel's Natural , Sovereign , Defensible borders" , Abbas statements are public relation as brainwash for arabs to hear rather than a genuine search for Mideast-/stability/peace wich is threatened by Iran's quest for mideast control and arab League quest for territorial unity , hegemony , A transparent , acountable democracies are a must all over the Mideast . Gaza is an example of arabs exploiting democratic notions for anti democratic goals , purposes , ends ,
Beside no Israeli government has a right to make decisions for that land. The entire world Jewish population will make decisions for that land. One Jewish State and more then 50 Islamic countries .Move the fence to the Jordanian borders
It will only be like Vietnam if there is a 'peace movement' in Israel that undercuts what is best for the nation, like in the USA in the 70's. That was quite a disgusting movement in the US, and the result is very easy to read, that the leftists of the world would be hard-pressed to show it was a 'good thing.' The millions of people killed in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos by the communists and totalitarians that took over in those countries, shall weigh against the anti-war crowds' souls when they pass on to the Spirit World. Those whom they indirectly helped kill will weigh heavily.
You are absolutely right. The Zionist accepted the UN Partiton Plan because it fit with the goal articulated at the first Zionist Congress. (...to establish a Jewish Homeland recognized in law) Rather than continue UN sponsored negotiations and accept the reasonableness of a federal/binational state, the Zionists used their influence (re: US. Europe), to get the desired result. No other middle eastern state voted for Partition. From 1897 onwards, the Zionist employed all manner of scheming, influence peddling, and money to position themselves for Paritioning. While the Zionist have always claimed 'self-defence', it must be understood that although disguised in diplomacy their initial goal was inherently offensive, aggressive and ultimately required violence to achieve the necessary ends of replacing the Mandate population with a Jewish majority. Where murder was required, (ie., Count Bernodatte), the Zionists always hide behind false apologies and the cloud of war.
Another popular myth of "Palestinians" is that they are descended from the Canaanites. Fascinating myth and it means that the "Palestinians",but they alone, have been immune to 3500 years of war, conquest, plague and famine (by the 14th century c.e.the region was vastly de-populated by these things). All this while avoiding any mention in the history books! Of course Arab immigration into the British Mandate of Palestine is well documented by texts of that era like the 1938 "Rape of Palestine" by William Ziff.
Dear Nehama, Is it not interesting how elephant in the living room `eludes` so many people? Hamastan at eastern & western walls-you must be dreaming. Remember, it is easier to deal with radical terror if you will pretend it does not exist. Take a look at how it works with `peace at any cost` crowd here, adapt to it than devide, build & resolve anythng your hart desires in a day. I hope you do not mind sarcasm.
You're delirious Jeff. The Saudi plan will do nothing but make it easier for the Arab states to attack the Israelis. Think about how many agreements the Arab groups have made...there is always someone who continues violating it, and the rest just say, 'Well, what can you do?' while they plan a further transgression.
You are correct, Bush rubberstamp Sen. Coleman was never a fit for leftist Minnesota voters and will be out of a job, replaced by Al Franken, come next year. Calculate the sq. km. of the 300 m. road through southern Israel, give Israel an equivalent chunk of the WB, and return the settlement-carved-up sections to Palestine. What could be more fair?
Look at the "martyr's posters" and get real. The Oslo Gang belongs in jail. That the IDF doesn't knock down every structure with a "martyr's" picture on it is to their shame. Giving Isreal to Jewkillers is like giving money to Neo-Nazis. Shameful fools!
Which Jim is here today the smiley face or the scowl face, the mask turns often and at random. "I want Israel to do the right thing and give up its war-like activities against peaceful Palestinians. I do not mean such as Islamic Jihad. They should be put out of business. but by Palestinians who want peace."-Jim now who would that be and who represents them, how many of them are there and where are they? Is it the people who voted in hamas- sworn to Israel's destruction and quotes the protocols in their charter. Is it people who support the PA- who make maximalist demands that are as realistic as an ice-cube giving birth. Tell us all how to identify this critical mass of people that, to quote you again-"Israel who is so used to war that she can no longer see the difference."-Jim I imagine it will be easy for you to identify this silent majority, shhhhhh they're silent eh.
The Palestinians only hope is to isolate Israel, expose her as the belligerent party, and spark large pressure on Israel to comprimise... That is precisely what the Arab world had been doing, especially since they understood how effectively to use Abbas/Hamas split. It does not matter what Israel concedes, how the land will be devided & so forth, if the #1 stumbling block in this copnflict is the sharply risen radical Islam & terror entirely in control of the situation (Pal for sure). Until that is eliminated, you can concede & devide anything you want, nothing will come of it. However, combatting such risen threat is not so simple, any intelligent person understands so. That does not work well with `peace now without borders` crowd. It is no secret the only addaptation in the current situation to continue & promote `peace now` is to completely ignore radical terror & lean on the more susceptible & adaptable piece. Precisely what has been going on & in context with Arab `game` plan.
That's how it goes. One side asks for what it wants. The other side asks for what it wants. They haggle. Eventually they meet somewhere in between. S.O.P. The only news is that Abbas is not asking for the Azrieli Mall.
Shut up you demented freak.I dont care what you have to say get it?? Now blow.
You are living ina fools paradise my friend.best wake up now and get in on the ground level in Kiryat Ono.
Howdy Tosefta; "No-man`s land belong to somebody." Perhaps if it was privately owned previously, but not if it was public land and definitely not in a sovereignty sense if it was still "disputed". "The border is infinitesimally wide,..." What border? Are you referring to the 1949 armistice line? Lines have no width--not even "infinitesimal" width--by definition. "and no-man`s land belongs to one nation or the other." And what "nation" would that be? Israel? Jordan? The Palestinian Territories have not been a part of a sovereign nation since 1917. "The fact that nobody dares step in there for fear of landmines or other does not remove a nation`s sovereignty." Whose sovereignty? The futuristic Islamic Republic of Palestine is not a nation yet and it certainly had no sovereignty over anything prior to 1967. "Nothing foolish about including this which is properly his." That is precisely what is being disputed, i.e., to whom does it "properly" belong?
Please look insulting and condescending words of Dav Zee. Gimmie... gimmie... gimmie... What hypocrisy. The world has become more aware of this type of arrogant Zionism. If we do not consider the other "pigs" or the "enemy," and consider divine reality, that we are brothers and sisters, we may get somewhere worthy of the children of God. Enough blood, death, pain, and suffering have been endured. Everyone in touch with reality and the facts knows that Israeli terror and oppression caused by Zionist expansionism is the root cause of the responses by Palestinians, be it peaceful or violent. Know that violence is not a cure for violence, yet love does beget love, and peace begets peace, and peace and love change hearts and minds. May the love and peace of our Jewish Brother Jesus Christ be will everyone.
terrornator, calm down, you'll have a heart attack. I'm a moderate, mate. I believe israel has a right to exist within its 1967 borders. I think the Arabs really need to sort their act out and enter the new millennium. I hate Ahmedinejad etc. etc. Wow if you hate me this much, you're really going to explode with people likc Clickfool and Tosefta. Chill.
America's a great nation terrornator, and I've met lots of nice, intelligent Americans. Unfortunately there are also people like yourself. Yes the Brits and the French helped screw up the Middle East in the 1930s. But since the second world war, the US has kindly taken over the job of screwing up the Middle East big time. From overthrwoing Mossadeq, to building up the Shah and Savak, to creating the Jihadist movement in Afghanistan, to armming Saddam, to invading Iraq and encouraging Israel to bomb Lebanon to bits, its been a blast, hasn't it. Really mate, if you want to start throwing stones about screwing up the Middle East you shouldn't live in a glass house.
lakshmi has it right. Abbas,Arafat and other Fatah leaders already made agreements with Israel concerning borders and a final settlement and never kept them. This is why OSLO failed. Arabs have never recognized Israel or UN resolutions. Armistice line and 242 are null and void. The Green line, '49 armistice are not relevant since they were refused by Arabs.Jordanians aka "Palestinians" are Refugees that squat illegally on Israel. Madrid,OSLO, Wye Hebron Protocols, Camp David and all UN resolutions have been not observed by Arabs and thus are totally null and void. The myth (dream perhaps) of a Palestinian State a "Pali-Stan" is a dangerous fantasy. Israel cannot afford another Islamic terror state on it's border along with Hamas-Stan, Lebanon and Syria. Israel in fact is now obligated under Geneva to remove Hamas-Stan and reclaim Gaza to uphold civil rights there. Most agreements made by Arabs are broken by Arabs. Mohammad the Prophet also cheated his enemies and broke agreements.
I do not understand why the US is pushing Israel to go to this conference. No matter what Israel is willing to offer or seriously negotiate about Abbas cannot deliver. He is responsible for the West Bank only and nothing he agrees to will be accepted by Hamas who controls Gaza. Any Agreement Abbas signs is not worth anything. He cannot enforce it. He did absolutely nothing to prevent the arms smuggling and terrorist gangs of Fatah (and Hamas and all the other armed groups) since he took over from Arafat so why in heavens name does Olmert think he can do business with Abbas, an inept, powerless leader???
& if Israel is not ready for it, shame on her. DEMAND (not negotiate) in the harshest, threatening tone for Israel to `peacefully` hang herself (the tone & the angle of presented images has to allow for continued hope to eventually wipe Israel off entirely, somewhat satisfying masses` 60 year pride & honor itch). The variations leading to the same non negotiable crap as before, except this time under disguise of Abbas` mouth, while terrorist arm, get ready & wait. If King George will not interfere with his ME agenda where so much effort was invested into Mr. Peace, Israel will obviously refuse to commit collective suicide again, but now they will be refusing so called Mr. Peace himself, `clearly exposing their Zionist war path`. Move over Mr. Abbas, enter much more ready & dangerous `resistance`. They will be even more justified in the eyes of world wide blind, Arab appeasers, Israeli bashers & hard core anti-Semites. I do not have to explain where hard core `pride & honor` stands.
years you have push your muslim crap down the throats of native frenchmen.get use to the real world,the french are ready to take control of their country back from you suicidal manics.the rest of the world has gotten wise to your total islamic domination of the whole world.when you get your nerve up,bring it on,its time to teach you backwards muslims that you can not and will not force the world to go back to the 6th cenutry.the problems in iraq are not the concern of the americans,its muslims killing muslims,just like you have for centuries.eventually the americans will realize that you guys just love to fight and kill,hell,it dont matter who your killing,just as long as your killing someone.yea,in the name of islam too,how pathetic you and your muslims brothers are.like i said,when you get your nerve up and decide to fight straight up instead of hiding behind your women and children,bring it on!actually it won't matter if you do use your weak to hide behind,were getting wise to that.
lakshmi has it right. Abbas,Arafat and other Fatah leaders already made agreements with Israel concerning borders and a final settlement and never kept them. This is why OSLO failed. Arabs have never recognized Israel or UN resolutions. Armistice line and 242 are null and void. The Green line, '49 armistice are not relevant since they were refused by Arabs.Jordanians aka "Palestinians" are Refugees that squat illegally on Israel. Madrid,OSLO, Wye Hebron Protocols, Camp David and all UN resolutions have been not observed by Arabs and thus are totally null and void. The myth (dream perhaps) of a Palestinian State a "Pali-Stan" is a dangerous fantasy. Israel cannot afford another Islamic terror state on it's border along with Hamas-Stan, Lebanon and Syria. Israel in fact is now obligated under Geneva to remove Hamas-Stan and reclaim Gaza to uphold civil rights there. Most agreements made by Arabs are broken by Arabs. Mohammad the Prophet also cheated his enemies and broke agreements.
Mr. Abbas will get the same thing Arafat got: NOTHING Unless they undestand politics the Palestinians will never have a state. Let them learn the political sciences and came back to the table. Maybe Mr. Abbas should read this.
Jim, I suggest that before you admonish Israel about returning land, you had better check out what is going on in the rest of the wrold. On the contrary: Israel is probably the ONLY country that has ever been asked to return land it has conquered for peace, and is the only one that will do so. Giving back conquered territory is more than a lot of other nations have done, not something that went out of style in World War 1 as you claim. Your admonitions that we lost to the Romans, the Greeks, and the Babylonians and we have it coming are also quite off kilter. Please check your extensive knowledge of history and see who started all those wars and mixed warfare and religion. It was not the Jews. Then realize how we persevered despite being conquered and driven out again and again and returned to our Land. But this time we are not leaving. If you want to know who is mixing politics and war with religion, I suggest you look at the Moslem fundamentalists, not us.
Outside the green line, Israel is entitled to squat.
Israel has to give up East Jerusalem to survive. It is holy to 1.5 billion Muslims and the Fastest growing religion in the world. It will either give it up and make peace, or forced to eventually give it up by war. For the sake of survival, it should give it up peacefully and only than can the Jews have a Homeland of their own in Peace with the Rest of the Muslim world. Otherwise, Palestinians, Arabs or not, the Pakistani's and Indonesians, or Bosnians and Turks will one day fight us for it.
It's called comprimise my friend. Even though the Israelis today are not interested in Comprimise, I still am. The West Bank and Gaza with safe passage, and East Jerusalem is a deal I, and the majority of Palestinians can accept... The Israelis are still in la-la land....thinking that they can extract even more...
Jasmine is incapable of believing Israel capable of doing any wrongdoing...perhaps her mum taught her this. At least we can be honest. The Arabs started the 1973 war...no dispute on that. For all the other wars, it is not at all clear the Arabs started them, and particularly the 1956,67,82 wars were initiated by Israel (I should add their 1978 raping of Lebanon, hot off the heals of peace talks with Egypt)...
Obviously, if a Gazan has a nice paper from Israel, it helps him travel. The question is why should Israel grant such papers to Gazans, especially "illegals," when there is no Israeli authority in Gaza to grant such papers. Furthermore, Israel can under any circumstances deny papers to illegals. Therefore, whether one considers the issue under the guise of Gaza still occupied, or Gaza no longer occupied, and indeed a hostile territory, the conclusion is the same. Israel has no obligation to grant papers to illegals, as no other country does. In Germany, illegals are in real concentration camps, and they need day passes to go anywhere. The papers granted to illegals in the WB, was a favour to Abbas.
I am glad you brought the term neo-coloniazation into this Talback! Today's wars are between the neo-colonialists and the Third World, countries freed from the old colonialism and striving to exercise autonomy. But neo-colonialism is another word for imperialism. What is necessary is that these wars be viewed for what they are: the rise of a new order (many small antions + a few big ones) vs. those who wish to perpetuate the old status quo. The way of the future will be to relate to small countries without the use of military force. Those who insist upon conquest will dig their own graves. And the sooner they are buried the better. Which is why I want Israel to do the right thing and give up its war-like activities against peaceful Palestinians. I do not mean such as Islamic Jihad. They should be put out of business. but by Palestinians who want peace, not by Israel who is so used to war that she can no longer see the difference. Regards
the neo-revisionist is back at it asking why we don't understand that a square is a circle, it's so obvious. goodness how is it possible that none of us can see that it's true. reality check for Keith, come in Keith, earth to Keith.... 500,000 Jews live beyond an OLD armistice line that the Arabs NEVER accepted as a border. Now this is being demanded as a border for a people who are still being invented and haven't reached the stagfe of being able to define themselves. Now YOU expect those 500,000 Jews to move. yep, sure sounds like a realistic plan, sure sounds like a worthwhile line in the sand. Keith, a poster child for those who never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity....and they wonder why they're still choking on sand.
think there will be peace if israel withdraws to the 67 borders?regardless of the fact of 2 wars or 3 wars,{i was counting the 67 war in my first post}the arabs were trying to exterminate the jews for 19 years,before the 67 war,and they will try from now on.it's irrelevant whether israel pulls back to the 67 borders or not,period.try using that thing we most call a brain michael,all you have to do is look at history.fact is,the arabs are never going to let israel have peace,along any borders,period!
And what, sullivan, have arabss done for peace aside from demand ridiculous things like a state for themselves, but then transfering all their citizens to a different state too flood it!? what have they done for peaec since 67? terrorism? rockets? how many times did he say they would stop? yeah, i thought so.
Your proposal is interesting, but I doubt the Israelis can oblige...really, have the Palestinians ever seen 5 years without Israeli violence or threat of violence directed at them? I was there back in 1986...before the Palestinians of the West Bank/Gaza barely lifted a finger to resist the occupation....and I remember quite clearly the IDF training guns on me as I walked down the street to Manara Square.
UNSCR 478 certainly is strongly worded, but most consider it non-binding. There's much room for negotiation. The Old City was majority-Jewish betw c. 1850 and 1948, till Jordan's Arab Legion ethnically-cleansed the Jews from there. UN has several organs exclusively devoted to the Palestinian people; hard to see it as unbiased. A third of its member states are Muslim. UN espouses the idea of the Palestinian people; Prof. Rashid Khalidi (who holds the Edward Said chair at Columbia) somewhat doubts the idea, following modern (post-modern? Judtian) skepticism about nationhood. He agrees "there is considerable evidence that much of the population of Palestine came, in Benedict Anderson's term, to 'imagine' themselves as a political community...early in the twentieth century." Tho current enthusiasm for Hamas, and Ashrawi's and Arafat's willingness to merge w/Jordan, or take it over, diminish this a bit. Abbas's starting point may be promising. Bargaining often starts high, esp in ME.
Israel has long since carried out a de facto annexation of the West Bank and Gaza. Abbas and Fayad are merely negotiating the terms of their apartheid subjugation. Putting more barbed wire and fences around the Palestinian ghettos and calling them a "nation" will change nothing. The only enduring solution is a bi-national state in which the special national rights of both the Hebrew-speaking Palestinians and Arabic-speaking Palestinians are protected.
Maybe because prefers to use the veto of US and keep on getting bigger and liberating more and more lebensraum.
"the proposed corridor between Gaza and the West Bank. No country that I know of, has agreed to such an arrangement." During the cold war there were air and land corridors in East Germany between West Berlin and West Germany.
Well, lets face it. Olmert is right. All Jews should go back to where they came from, except the ones from the Arab countries that refuse to allow Jews to live there. Olmert and his party should lead the way, and then everyone else will follow his example. But I forgot! What about the Jews who lived in Gaza, Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem BEFORE 1967? Where are THEY supposed to go back to??? Gosh, how can we work this out so everyone is happy, happy, happy? How hard can it be to "negotiate" with Abbas who only is alive because Israel let him leave Gaza, let him into Samaria, and then gave him hundreds of milions of dollars and untold amounts of weapons? This situation is so bazaar, it is off the scale of rational discourse.
Blocking the Straits of Tiran as Egypt did both times was an act of war, Keith. The troops were massing on the border at the same time. You don't block another country's access to oil as an act of friendship.
Howdy Tosefta; 2. It was Abbas who made a fool out of himself by trying to cherry pick which parts of the 1949 and 1950 agreements that he liked while rejecting or ignoring the parts that he didn't like. He can't have it both ways. Either he tries to go with the 1949 armistice line around the Gaza Strip or with the 1950 armistice line. He can't mix-and-match the two to try to maximize the area of the Gaza Strip without starting from scratch all over again. I don't care about "understanding" political motivations anymore than "understanding" insanity. That is the business of political scientists and psychologists who seem to be obsessed and fascinated with "explaining" deviant and demented human behavior to the rest of us.
The PLO Declaration of Independence(1988) based itself on Res.181&194.Arafat betrayed the Palestinians when he signed the Oslo which gives them a measly 22% land.Res.181 gave them 44% land & Dr.Haidar al Shafir(one of the PLO delegation leaders)specifically refused to sign.abbas the quisling signed for the PLO.The 181 border is the only legally authorised border between israel & Palestine.See A.D'Amato 'Israel's Borders Under International Law' (pdf,p.3)Not relevant that the Arabs rejected 181 which gave 56%land to minority jews 33%.The voting at the UN was not unanimous.25 for,17 abstentions,13 no.Hamas has made an HISTORIC COMPROMISE and abandoned the muslim plan of a unitary state.They accept the 2 state.Does not mean the measly 22%. The Partition Line,plus East J. as capital,plus ROR would be their minimum demand.The armistice line of 1949 was israel's taking another grab of 22%.It was a bilateral agreement with egypt,lebanon,jordan,syria,and not meant to be final border.
Lets assume for arguments sake that Israel did withdraw all the settlements and handed over the entire infrastructure at a cost to the Palestinians. How does Mr. Abbas propose to traverse what is Israel between non contiguous pieces of land in Gaza and the West Bank. Since he and his Arab brothers have finally settled on just the West Bank and Gaza, how can they operate a "country" that occupies non contiguous land masses??? I am sure that Palestinian lives would be no less difficult when Ahmed has to travel from Gaza, go through Israeli customs, and then re-enter Palestinian territory as well. These leaders need to be a little more intelligent about their demands and their future. They also demonstrate that they are not negotiating, but demanding what has always been demanded. Give it to them, don't destroy whats there, but make them pay a price for the infrastructure and development that Israel has poured into those areas.
I don't remember the Arabs being consulted when the UN partioned Palestine into two areas, with the larger amount of land being given to the Jews. Do you remember that? Do you think that were the UN to vote to redivide the land that Israel would comply? Not on your life. The only UN resolution with which Israel has EVER complied is 181, the partition resolution. Also are you not aware that Ben Gurion, who was wary of partition, said that they would accept it but when the Jews became strong as the result of becoming a state they would expand to all the area? Perhaps that is one reason why the Arabs did not accept partition. They knew it would likely only be a matter of time until they were swept from their homes and lands as happened in 1948.
I propose, as a pre-condition to holding any negotiations at all, that the Palestinians commit to five years of no violence. If they can't make that commitment, then what are they offering Israel anyway?
you tried that dumb crap on me too,moron,looks like your the only fool in here thats upset.try going to your local mosque and ask your clerics what to do when you pitch your childish tirades and no one really cares!LMFAO at fools like you
should read: The situation doesn't suit Israelis
I can make peace with you too...but as with you, I doubt I can make peace with the legions of Jewish posters here that claim Olmert is a traitor... What do you make of all this Israeli/Jewish rejectionism? Are you thinking that because of "radical Arab/Islamic/Suicide Cult theology" (as you put it), that Jews feel the land is all theirs, as given by God? Odd connection....
1 I agree that one should not call others pigs. 2 Tzedek requires self defense. 3 Dav is absolutely right about the proposed corridor between Gaza and the West Bank. No country that I know of, has agreed to such an arrangement. Personally, I am opposed to it. No one really pays attention to it, as if it were the most natural thing to ced a corridor to a foreign entity on one's sovereign state. It is one thing to say that Israel should give up conquered lands, and quite another to say that Israel has the obligation to be the one to create a Palestinian state. Gaza and the West Bank were never integrated, either geographically, politically or nationally. They are two pieces of land, one of which was occupied by Jordan, the other occupied by Egypt. These lands should have gone back to their original occupiers. Israel made a monumental mistake in agreeing to Oslo. Israel has been the loser ever since.
you didn't address the point that the brits and french are the reason the middle east is so screwed up right now,fool!the only thing you supplied america was a need to bail your asses out in 2 world wars,which cost way too many american lives for a bunch of ungrateful morons like yourself!
Let's start with the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. According to Jasmine the irish Murphy, she claims Israel did not start that war. Zeev Schiff, the Israeli correspondent who wrote a book on the topic, would disagree... Perhaps so would the souls of 10,000 dead civillians. The point is very simple: both side have behaved very poorly since 1948. Israelis have been made to believe that they have never ever did anything wrong. One mark of evil in humans is the inability to admit responsibility....read M Scott Peck, the Pychology of Evil... Take Care and I hope you too aren't sulking at the prospects of peace and territorial comprimise like so many of your Jewish brethren.
"believe me if peace of the whole country depends on a few settlements these pious people would be the first to give up their homes willingly." Maybe if it depended on a few settlements, like u say, I would beleive you. However, I beleive the number of illegal settlers (illegal by all interntional standards, surprisingly, even those of the U.S)is now almost 500,000. While we're on this, you and other ignorant posters on this page like you might also want to re-visit your history books. Israel, France and Britain started the 1956 war. Israel provoked and then pre-empted the 1967 war. Israel invaded lebanon in 1982... How dare you claim the arabs started those wars.
You imagine that Israel "grants" residency as an empty gesture. Nobody on Earth likes wasting his time like that. A thinking Earthling would then think of the benefits that this status can grant. Legal Residency has implications, and not only for being present in Gaza. Example; Suppose a Gazan wants to leave the prison of Gaza and visit a relative living elsewhere, or perhaps study abroad. How would this be done? The Gazan has to apply to Israel for permit to leave, and this may or may not be granted. If granted, the Gazan will nowadays be allowed to leave either through Israel (Erez crossing) or Kerem Shalom (Israel briefly, then Egypt). Without Residency it will be tougher, if not impossible. Even before the Hamas takeover, an illegal Gaza resident was not allowed to cross Rafah. (The European inspectors enforced this.) In general, on Earth, if there is something that sounds strange try to understand it. This is the way you can learn our ways. Most of the time, there is logic behind Earthly behavior.
tribes&peoples who lived in the region before the Hebrews got there.The descendants of these peoples got converted to Islam&Arabised in the 7th century A.D.They never left the land (unlike the jews who left)and were there when the Ottoman Turks ruled and cultivated the land by customary right.The legal right belonged to absentee landlords and it is from them that the zionists of late 19th century bought land.The Palestinian farmers were evicted. The indigenous jews were a minority of 5% in a dominant muslim,christian majority.The zionists subsequently engaged in fraud& violence and this continues to this day!
I realize that for Anti-Semites (many hidden ones in this forum) that any space for a Jewish State in the world even if it was one centimeter by one centimeter is too big! Look at the Map! Look at all the Islamic nations that spread from Coast to Coast in Northern Africa, Virtually all of the Mid-East (except tiny Israel), large Part of Europe (Turkey, Bosnia, Chechnya, Albania, Kosovo), Central Asia (the Stans), Pakistan, Bangladesh, Western China, 100 million Muslims in India, Malaysia, Indonesia and also present in many non-Muslim nations including Israel and Judea and Samaria. Islam is spreading and not peacefully as we see in Darfur, Turkey, Kosovo, Iraq, Western China and in the streets of Paris. Islam is the bully, not Israel and not the Jews. There are but 14 million Jews in the world and we Pre-date Christianity and Islam by thousands of years. Why are there so few Jews? Because Jews do not force convert as Islam and Christianity has. Jews respect other cultures.
Res.181.The Partition Line is still the only legally authorised border between israel&Palestine.See A.D'Amato 'Israel's Borders Under International Law' (pdf,page 3). The PLO's Declaration of Independence in 1988 is based on 181 & 194.
In theory, the UN plays no favorites. The fact that there are five full time members in the Security Council that can block anything, says otherwise. Specifically, Tossie, the UN is one corrupt organization whose resolutions and talk only seek to rob nations of their wealth and their sovereignty. There are so many actions taken by the General Assembly that are a detriment to the Western Countries, and the USA in particular, that to consider this organization as neutral is anathema. Your name-calling in your #206 undermines your 'reasoned' points. The UN should be disestablished and strong consideration given as to whether or not there should be a replacement. Perhaps on Mauritius.
You do quite a flip: are you an acrobat? The situation suit Israelis. It's mainly self defense and some rather too gung ho religious Jews. They are as desirous of peace as anyone else and believe me if peace of the whole country depends on a few settlements these pious people would be the first to give up their homes willingly. All this despite the fact that Israel was the winner in all the wars started by the Arabs. What do you think, Jim, would the Arabs have given Israel easy terms if they'd won? Would there actually have been any Jews left to be given easy terms if the Arabs had won? Ever thought of that? Don't answer because it'll be too embarrassing for you in the light of your previous messages.
I guess you are not very literate and therefore have it all ass backwards. The Arabs MUST stop their TERROR, dismantle their Militant Sewer Rat Organizations and agree to leave their Arab kin in places where they settled as well as agree to Jews living in YESHA and than and meybe then will we have something to talk about. Jews have a right to settle anywhere in YESHA on their own land and have the right to allow the squatter to live on land that in their generosity they allow them to. This is Jewish land and not yours or your Arab paramour and sperm donor. So please get youf your high horse and start knowing your place. Bullshit only goes so far and no further and YOU MA CHERIES ARABIST ZSA has reached that point.
Hamas can grant its own residency papers, if it so wishes. The "illegal" residents in Gaza have no reason to hide from Israeli authorities precisely since such authorities are no longer in Gaza.
#25 Clickfool: Why are British / European antisemites who meddle in the Mid East conflict more Palestinian than most Palestinians? For you a British person to insult the patriotism of Abbas is despicable.
Hamas started firing rockets because the israeli occupation never ended. They had control of almost everything... you think hamas is inactive in the West Bank ? They can fire just as many rockets...they just don't becuase they are not as oppressed as they are in Gaza, With israel threatening to cut off electricty and water. Imagine! Give the Palestinians a chance at peace. Arabs are all basically the same people, if peace can work with Egypt and Jordan it can work with Palestine. A just peace that is.
Jasmine has it correct, Ibrahim. The facts are disputable, but only because of enmity and evil. In 1967 the Israelis were attacked. In 1948 the Israelis were attacked, in 1973 the Israelis were attacked (although their state of readiness was such that the Egyptians made an excellent start to the war, from their side of things), etc. Yasser Arafat had many chances to make peace and dwell in peace with Israel, but his hate and the venom in his soul would not let him say, 'Peace' with conviction. The Palestinians have preached hate to their children for over a generation, including those who fight now. Without a change in thier soul, the Palestinians won't be able to make a true peace, the way many Israelis wish, but not at the expense of the treacherous ones currently in power in Israel.
When Israel was attacked, it was RIGHT for her to defend herself. Now that she is in control it behooves her to make peace rather than to extend her domain at the expense of the conquered. Since she has become dominant she has gabbed land, looked the other way while her settler vigilantes make war on their neighbors, interfered with vital travel, destroyed crops and homes, attacked families in their homes in the dead of night, permitted individuals in her IDF to pursue their own little vengeance exercises, and in general exhibited her despite of Palestinains as a whole. All for the sake of defense. But note well, Jsmine Murphy: THIS IS NOT DEFENSE! How would you expect a sensible people to respond to such treatment? They are not going to roll over and play dead. So if Israel wants peace, she had better start acting like it.
Your empty threats are more hollow sounding than the ones the Arab Terror States gave Israel in 1948! Israel won WITHOUT the USA help in every war except 1973 when Soviet forces were attacking Israel alongside their Egyptian/Syrian Allies. Before that and since Israel is protected by Jewish Israels and we do not need the US! In fact the US has prevented Israel from winning it's wars. It is the US protecting the Arabs not the reverse. If it was not for the US Israel would have killed Arafat in Lebanon in 1982. If it was not for the US Israel would have not withdrew from Sinai in 1956 and in 79. If it was not for the US Israel would have invaded Cairo in 67' and in '73. But the US stopped Israel! US stopped Israel from winning in 2001, and in Lebanon in 2006. You and every other Anti-Israel pro Arab terror person should thank the US for its protection of the Arab from Israel. The Arab's are traitors to themselves, US, their allies and to their own families them selves are worse enemy.
Security Council Resolution 478 (1980) "Reaffirming again that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible. . Deeply concerned over the enactment of a "basic law" in the Israeli Knesset proclaiming a change in the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, with its implications for peace and security. . 2. Affirms that the enactment of the "basic law" by Israel constitutes a violation of international law and does not affect the continued application of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since June 1967, including Jerusalem" 1. "I was talking about territory acquired by war and Chap. 2 of the UN Charter implies that the seized territory must have been a part of at least one of the High Contracting Parties" Jeff, please read Security Council Resolution 478 and tell us: A. Does it apply to Jerusalem? B. Was East Jerusalem part of the National Territory of Jordan? C. Does the Security Council consider the "inadmissibility" principle to apply only to national territory? D. Who reads into Article 2 of the UN Charter the "inadmissibility" principle? (Clue: It is a certain UN body.) E. What can you conclude from the above? (Clue: Only dummies will have a hard time here.) 2. As you yourself said, but failed to draw the conclusions, a territory may be occupied and disputed at the same time. Please answer the following: A. Does the Geneva Convention make any allowance for a territory in dispute? B. From which point does Geneva apply, from the beginning of occupation, from the middle, or at the end? C. Conclusion: Can the occupier say: I want to wait until the ultimate fate of the Territory is known and only then I will apply Geneva? 3. You also give a most ridicuolous reading of Israel 's IHCJ concerning the seam line. It is a disgrace for me to even talk to a Blockhead. I leave the rest to Johnboy. "I don`t know whether the world is full of smart men bluffing or imbeciles who mean it." - Barak Ravid
I tried to explain to you, Jeff. No-man's land belong to somebody. The border is infinitesimally wide, and no-man's land belongs to one nation or the other. The fact that nobody dares step in there for fear of landmines or other does not remove a nation's sovereignty. Nothing foolish about including this which is properly his. As far as he dead sea, it has been shrinking for many years, and the figure of 220 must come with a date attached. If it is close enough to 205, you can take this to be Abbas' area as a likelihood. But this is reality; not exactly your field.
Would you be good enough to be a bit more specific about the Canal blocking--?? After you have, we can go into some of the other matters in your post-- Thanks in advance
With you, my friend, there can be peace. You and I would compromise. By definition, a fair compromised agreement is when both parties are disappointed. You are intelligent, fair, and proud. I don't agree with all you say-but I respect it. The problem is the radical Arab/Islamic/Suicide Cult theology that there should be no Jewish presence in the Middle East. Candy passed out when Jewish children are killed. Streets named after the individuals who kill the Jewish children-a huge honor. There is too much evidence that the Palestinians do not want any Jewish State of Israel to exist. Period. Ibrahim, continue to advocate a fair 2 State solution. Don't let Clickfool, Lakshmi, Indrajaya, Dutch, Hannah call you a traitor. Say that they are bigots. Clearly. Then the high moral ground in the world would belong to the Palestinians-who would get their country. But the Jewish country of Israel must-and will exist. At all costs. On this, there is no compromise.
Please look insulting and condescending words of Dav Zee. Gimmie... gimmie... gimmie... What hypocrisy. The world has become more aware of this type of arrogant Zionism. If we do not consider the other "pigs" or the "enemy," and consider divine reality, that we are brothers and sisters, we may get somewhere worthy of the children of God. Enough blood, death, pain, and suffering have been endured. Everyone in touch with reality and the facts knows that Israeli terror and oppression caused by Zionist expansionism is the root cause of the responses by Palestinians, be it peaceful or violent. Know that violence is not a cure for violence, yet love does beget love, and peace begets peace, and peace and love change hearts and minds. May the love and peace of our Jewish Brother Jesus Christ be will everyone.
History can't be allowed to repeat itself--- Palestine was chopped into pieces a long time ago---When the Ottoman Empire was defeated in World War One, and the British received the Mandate to administer it---Out of the goodness of their heart, at no expense to themselves, the Brits gave away a huge chunk of the land that was supposed to have given to the Jews under the Balfour Declaration---The Brits were generous and gave away the West Bank of the Jordan to Emir Abdullah, as a reward for him not having given them troubles during the Big War--- Israel didn't grab any territory---she conquered it after having been attacked time and again--- The Arabs decided they didn't want their share of the Partition Plan and attacked Israel instead--- Arab-Israeli War [First phase: 14 May 1948?11 June 1948 The British mandate over Palestine was due to expire on 15 May, but Jewish Leadership led by future Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, declared independence on 14 May. The State of Israel declared itself as an independent nation, and was quickly recognized by the Soviet Union, the United States, and many other countries. Over the next few days, approximately 1,000 Lebanese, 5,000 Syrian, 5,000 Iraqi, 10,000 Egyptian troops invaded the newly-established state. Four thousand Transjordanian troops invaded the Corpus separatum region encompassing Jerusalem and its environs, as well as areas designated as part of the Arab state by the UN partition plan. They were aided by corps of volunteers from Saudi Arabia, Libya and Yemen. In an official cablegram from the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States to the UN Secretary-General on 15 May 1948, the Arab states publicly proclaimed their aim of creating a "United State of Palestine" in place of the Jewish and Arab, two-state, UN Plan. They claimed the latter was invalid, as it was opposed by Palestine's Arab majority, and maintained that the absence of legal authority made it necessary to intervene to protect Arab lives and property.[101] Israel, the US and the Soviets called the Arab states' entry into Palestine illegal aggression, UN secretary general Trygve Lie characterized it as "the first armed aggression which the world had seen since the end of the [Second World] War." China broadly backed the Arab claims. Both sides increased their manpower over the following months, but the Israeli advantage grew steadily as a result of the progressive mobilization of Israeli society and the influx of an average of
" the IDF went out and the IAF went in" And why do you think that was,Faris? I'll tell you why,as if you didn't know..because Hamas stepped up their attacks on Israel.Did you expect no response to daily attacks? BTW,Rafah is controlled by Hamas and Egypt..the EU monitors are long gone,just as well for all the good they did.
More important even than Tsedek is Pikuah nefesh. One doesn't 'give up' security without making sure that the population is safe
Howdy Tosefta; 1. If Abbas was including the water area of the West Bank in the Dead Sea (which is 220 sq. Km. and not 205 sq. Km.), then why did the article state: "According to Palestinian negotiating documents obtained by The Associated Press, the Palestinian demands include all of the Gaza Strip, West Bank, east Jerusalem and small areas along the West Bank frontier that were considered no-man's land before the Six-Day War"? I don't think that Abbas was including water areas in his figure, but rather, the former no-man's-land areas and all of East Jerusalem. The point is that Abbas is pushing his demands to the maximum and if this is his "bottom line" instead of just a "starting position", then he and the Palestinians are going to wind up with what Arafat (MHRIH) delivered, namely: zilch.
Obey our demands,or else...Send all the palrats to the East Bank...where jordan is now,was Land the Brits usurped from the Jewish People...Let the palrats have it...
I'm not a vampire, just an ordinary Israeli monster. Do you really think that Israel and Gaza aren't in a state of war at the moment with missiles and mortars flying daily? About children killed: some posters were quoting 70 percent under eighteens in Gaza (amazing isnt it?) and something like eighteen percent of casualties being children indicating that Israel has taken extraordinary care not to hit children. Think about it. salaam
and how do explain How the Vietamese communists countinue today a policy of neo-colonization nibblling away at Cambodia by annexing sizable portions of its border, costlines and islands through illegitimate treaties with their puppet regime in Phnnom Penh. Their latest method is a "development Triangle" scheme that involves flooding three northeastern provinces of Cambodia and three southeastern prvinces of Loas with Vietnamease settlers. Nor that Vietnamese army has established coffee, cashew and rubber plantations in the Laotian provinces- the latter vovering more than 7,000 hectares. China and Tibet, Russia and the occupation of 3 Japanesse islands, Indosesia and Boreno, and and and But Jim knows "its no longer the rule " victors to retain land. What nonsense thier JIMBO
No one wants Israel to swap land. What they want is for Israel to return to the land it was granted in 1948 and give back what it has grabbed. The concept of keeping what you conquer went out with Kaiser Wilhelm II. 1918 set the precedent. 1945 hammered it home. Trying to live by the pre-1918 principle "keep what you take" is no longer Kosher. And unless Israel learns that religion is no longer a legitimate basis for war, it may well be the beginning of the end for Israel - as you have stated. She lost to Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome. It is time she learned the lesson. Religion and politics do not mix.
The holidays ended and all the territorialists and receivers of God's heritage woke up to the unpleasant noise of real negotiations. How do you dare calling any people "pigs"? Does it please you when some call you "kikes"? And enemies? Well with whom do nations make peace agreements if not with their enemies! They normally change after a mutually satisfactory peace deal is signed. Just admit it: You don't want to give up the occupied land, because you impropriated it. I got news for you. It's not going to work for you. One of the basic prophetic requirements is "tzedek tsedek tirdof". It's not tsedek to keep conquered territories with an indigenous population for yourself. And tsedek will prevail.
Hey AbbASS you moron, how about some guarantees that go the other way? What are you guaranteeing Israel for return to '67 borders? Nothing! Because not only is AbbASS gutless, he is irrelevant and carries no power. This entire event is nothing more than repetitive uselessness. You Muslim perverts want all or nothing. No compromise no give, all take. This is why in 60 years forward, the same discussion will take place.
"The Israeli government has granted official residency status to 3,500 Palestinians who in the last decade entered the West Bank on Israeli-issued visitors' visas but never left, Palestinian officials said Wednesday. Israel however did not grant official residency status to another 1,500 Palestinians residing illegally in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. "After Israel had declared the Gaza Strip as a hostile entity, it decided to postpone any decision regarding its [illegal] citizens"." - Haaretz (today) Very interesting power of Israel regarding an "unoccupied" territory. Wake up to reality, all ye apologists.
I can't talk for the other I'm lumped together with in your email, but I have no problem with Jews at all. I live in a Jewish area, I've always had Jewish friends. I value their wit, intelligence and history of sane moderation. I agree with you that the Jewish people have no recent pre-1948 history of colonialism, though to be fair, it's hard to colonialise when you don't have a state, and Jews did colonise Canaan. The occupation of the West Bank is therefore a particular tragedy. The trouble is you're treating it like the Americans treated the native Americans. Oppress the locals for long enough and they'll shut up. But really, the result is more like the last days of the British Empire, and take it from a Brit, when the locals spend their whole time shooting at you, it's time to go home to Israel (with minor agreed border swaps). If thinking that makes me anti-semitic, then most of the world is anti-semitic.
They say vampires can't see their own reflection in a mirror... ....that would be you. most Lebanese Christians I know didn't take too kindly to Israel's wholesale destruction of Beruit. If you call blocking a canal, starting a war, then clearly, given Israel's complete blockade of Gaza and the West Bank....well, you do the math. The bottom line: In the context of a final peace settlement, there will not be any more attempts to resist Israeli occupation. If Palestinians still attack Israel after Israel withdraws and a peace is deal is signed, then you have my full support in responding according. Just to let you know: Israel has killed MORE Palestinian children than vice versa. Take Care.
Television shows that don't depict Jews as blood thirsty vampires? Israel back on the map in their textbooks? Terrorists from 30 different Islamic gangs converted into a police farce?
"We control nothing. Hamas and Egypt showed us clearly the other day that they are in full control of the Rafiah crossing." Did you forget how angry Israel reacted? You can be sure that privately the message was even more blunt. If the Israeli governement wants the Rafah crossing to be open it should just say so.
Yes the solution is not a unilateral withdrawal with control of see/airports...airspace...imports/exports and pretty much everything having to do with the outside world. If gazans are in control of their own fate, why are there demonstrations of students who are not allowed to go back and continue their education abroad ? Sovereignty of gaza as well as other palestinian territories is more than welcomed, but it should be done within the scope of a comprehensive and permanent peace deal. I really don't understand what your issue with this is. Unilateral withdrawal based on racial grounds to maintain a jewish majority while continuing to bombard the land you withdraw from does not yell out peace. Sitting down and negotiating with the above stated peace initiative from Abbas does.
I would agree to these Palestinian demands in FULL with the stipulation that every rocket, mortar or missile fired from the territories would equal one square kilometer that Israel could legally seize without any obligation to return. Ever. Israel chooses which square kilometer to take.
stop pretending. Nobody is taken in by your kind of rubbish
Grow up, SystemF. This is no longer the 19th century! It is no longer the rule for conquerors to take what they want and for the conquered to settle for what the conqueror chooses to give them out of the snideness of his heart. World War II put an end to that imperialist way of thinking.
I've red enough of rubbish from you today. The deal is very simple to understand: either you leave the occupied territories today and keep what the UN gave you or you'll be thrown to the mediteranean sea in the future because of your stubborness. We don't care about how America is military strong or may be your didn't notice the humiliation in which the US is sinking in Iraq and that just the beginning. Iran IS building a nuke and nobody dare to attack them. Ask yourself WHY ? 40 years ago you were still playing with the Muslims like one plays with toys. That time has gone and now you have to face the reality. The Muslim world is at least strongly resisting at worst attacking you. Believe me time is running out not for us but for you and your so-called friends. Enjoy the few years or decades of power still left in your hands, it won't last.
Other than the refugee issues, I have no problem with his demands related to land- even abandoning some of the settlements. What I am concerned about is how are the Palestinians going to ensure that qassams and scuds don't start raining down on us in Israel or Palestine won't be used as a base for further attacks. If we can figure that one out, I personally can agree to his demands around land and Jerusalem.
Five wars wished on us: one within days of the new state being born, one on the holiest day of the year as a result of which we conquered territory and would have got to the Arabs countries' capital cities if we hadn't been stopped by the USA and WE grabbed? Our children killed by these fanatical Jihadists going tamely to school or in Pizzerias or in discoteques and WE are considered irresponsible by you. Jim, go and do some reading or have a mind colonic wash out.
Mark, Abbas was never able to agree to more than Arafat agreed to, which is the Clinton Parameters. All the news about progress came from Olmert. Olmert started from scratch, knowing little about the past and making his own slow progress. In this case, I don't believe Abbas is protecting himself; he simply is unable to go against Arafat and no Palestinian in sight will be able to do better than that. As far as Israeli politics, Netanyahu will be unable to sign a peace deal; Likud is too far from any reasonable position. Barak is now moving to the right because he wants to get elected, and the electorate is on the Right. After the elections I assume he will be back where he was. This is why you don't hear too many complaints from Labor about the Barak line. It is understood.
Absolutely
You do it yourself. We control nothing. Hamas and Egypt showed us clearly the other day that they are in full control of the Rafiah crossing. If you don't want peace, just continue as you are going: daily rockets - at least six a day - mortar fire daily and you still hold our soldier incommunicado. If you don't think that giving up Gaza was a step towards peace then it's okay. Go on as you're going, destabilise things and if we have a hardliner PM we can reconquer Gaza: stranger things have happened.
Zionism is self-determination. Those who would deny these rights to the Jewish people need to give logic in order to be taken seriously. The usual yadder about Zionists not wanting peace is accompanied by a prejudicial stench when one looks at the facts. Jews simply don't have a track record as colonialists or empire builders. But the necessities of secure borders remain whilst surrounded by hostile enemies. Amongst these are Islamic armies (both formal Nation State ones and terrorist branches), as well as those whose ideologies prevent them from accepting a Jewish presence in the Jewish Homeland. This group includes Arab Education Ministers & Neo-Comms (like yourselves?) who refuse to relate to the fact that population transfer already took place e.g. Iraqi Jews, forced out, cannot now return & claim what was theirs. They just aren't refugees any more because they moved on. Pals should be allowed to do the same not forced by "friends" to fester as anti-Israel propaganda
How irresponsible can you get??? Here's how irresponsible you can get, Jasmine: chop Palestine up into pieces. that's what Israel has done and wants to continue doing. Israel should give up all the territory she has grabbed since 1948 and return to her original borders. Anything less is irresponsible. And, instead of trying to control things her own way, Israel should cooperate 100% with Abbas' Palestinian Police to enable them to put belligerents in the West Bank out of business and eventually do the same in the Gaza strip and thus put an end to the war. That is being responsible.
1. 1982 Israel was asked by SLebanese Christians to help them. Israel 'started' nothing. 2. 1956, 1967 blocking the canal by Egypt was an actus belli. Sorry but the wars were both started by Egypt. Besides which there were troops massing on the border: hardly a sign of peace. 3. You mean that Israel didn't want Lebanon to be Fatahland? Neither did the Lebanese. 4. Ibrahim use your brains: if our enemies are allowed to drive aboveground it's easy for them to plant bombs for us, infiltrate or whatever. Of course you dont care that we'd need to patrol your 'safe passage' but I, strangely, do. If it's not practical to build underground you're welcome to go around. How about the fairness of being a good neighbour and stop trying to kill our children, stop trying to smuggle in bombs, stop firing missiles? Wow, you don't see the truth of your position at all, do you?
There is lots of room in Iran for my Palestinian brothers to settle in. Because we Iranian love our Palestinian brothers we will give each Palestinian 40 hertars of land to settle on. See how we Iranians settle the right of return,
And when they are done shooting each other for control of it, they will have to beg Israel to step in again. Its not like Egypt, Syria, or Jordan bother to help these guys. Palestine as it is right now can not exist because it will just be creating an open battlefield. Look what happened when Hamas was elected, there's a civil war there now. Does any of the Arab world actually do anything? Israel took its funding out of Gaza and got criticized for creating a humanitarian crisis. You give the Palestinians their independence, and you'll be screwing them over. As long as Hamas and Fatah are shooting at each other and at Israel, that economy will never get on track. Power struggles tear countries apart. I personally don't think the Palestinians could handle their own indpendence right now.
drew, you are absolutely correct! these people don't want peace, they just want to demand. I think that giving them anything without first getting ironclan assurances that they will definitively stop their terrorist acts, and disarm their militants is not only stupid, it is also very dangerous! mr olmert, if you really want to negotiate with mr abbas then you must make it clear that 1 holocost is enough for our people and that we want a peaceful neighbor. not an enemy at the gate
Tragically, we will see another round of Israel flexing its military muscle followed by growing international calls for boycotts and political isolation before Israeli voters finally say "enough" accept the possibility of a post-zionist reality.
No one wants peace more than lovers of Israel. No one wants war more than haters of Israel. The current proposals by Abbas assures more war and terror. My proposal: 1)full civil Palestinian autonomy 2) Only pistols are allowed to be carried by Palestinian police 3) All Palestinian militants/terrorist must be completely disarmed 4) All Palestinian terror factions must be dismantled and their leaders handed to Israel 4) Israel maintains control of all borders 5) Israel has Joint security patrols and is solely responsible for fighting terror in areas A,B,C (under OSLO it was different) 6)Palestinians must be responsible for their own infrastructure 7) Refugees will be allowed to return to Palestinian areas only and only if they have no previous affiliation with any Arab terror faction 8) EU oversight to assure money Palestinian govt receives goes to people not to Swiss bank accounts as usual 9) Infrastructure like schools, hospitals will be built 10) No incitement against Israel.=Peace
That is the definition of BS. Gaza was being raided and palestinians in gaza were being killed long before Hamas came to power, right when hamas came to power and continue to do so now that hamas is in power. Israel still controls all the ports of entry into and out of gaza and all imports/exports and both the sea and air ports..and u call that a withdrawal ? Yes the rockets should stop and yes hamas should let the PA negotiate a final peace settlement. However, no one should try to insult our intelligence and claim that israel's withdrawal from gaza was a step towards peace. Whats the point? The IDF went out and the IAF went in.
Best offer Israel will ever get. Take the Saudi Peace plan, restore ties with the Arab world, Palestinian State on all occupied lands, and a just resolution to the Palestinian refugee problem. It's win-win for everyone
If world recognized borders are drawn, Palestinian Arabs are exercising their self determination then if they choose peaceful leaders it will be easier for Israel to work with them and fight Hamas and the Israel deniers. If the opposite happens and Palestinian Arabs elect Hamas or other Israel enemies that would break the peace then it will be a legitimate right of Israel to defend itself against a hostile state. BTW: Buyukadada havalar nasil?
I am supportive of Abbas' efforts to forge peace with a reluctant Israel. In the past, I have noted the lack of clarity coming out of the Fateh/PA and this is exactly what is needed: CLARITY to show the world who is being greedy and who is not! For the record: I am very concerned about the import of Arms into the Middle East AND Israel's continued exports of arms.
Abbas' demands sound strange. My personal demand to abbas and to the whole world is, ISRAEL SHOULD BE GIVEN THE PRE AD 70 BORDER. Israel was destroyed by the roman emperor titus in AD 70. Now Israel needs that border or area of AD 70. Muslims, USA, UN and the whole world should help Israel to get the area of pre AD 70. During that time, there was one Jeurusalem, Temple mount with the Temple. No mosque on the temple mount.There is no thought of dividing east,west,north, and south Jerusalem. Jerusalem is one. No division. Isareli government should demand the pre AD 70 border or area. Nothing else. Do not be deceived by the terrorists ideas.
Abbas is demanding too much. The Palestinians have not once lived up to an agreement they have signed and have never intended to abide to signed agreements. For example the Palestinians have not changed their charter to destroy Israel which they were supposed to under OSLO (and never did!). The Palestinians Authority (or lack of) have many illegal weapons, too many police, and are corrupt.The Palestinian Fatah terror group agreed to fight terror and disarm them but instead the turned to Israel to protect them from Hamas. Now there is a Hamastan, let us prevent a "Pali-stan" another Arab terror state within Israel that's sole aim is to destroy the very Nation that the Arab's have illegally squatted on. No more Squatter rights for illegal Arabs in Israel. Amen.
Israel started the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. Israel started the 1967 war. Israel started the 1956 war. Israel has tried to destabalize Lebanon and install puppet regimes. Israel worked with Iran to try and destabalize Iraq. Let's not be too simplistic and ignorant. The Arab World has threatened Israel. The Arab World has rejected Israel's existence in the past. The Arab World has not come to help the Palestinians. But to erase any blame of Israel is dishonest to say least. BTW: Use your brain. it is easier for a the Israelis to drive underground for a few meters to bypass the safe passage. It is not practable to build a tunnel the entire lenght of the Gaza-WB safe passageway. A little fairness would go a long way to being a good neighbor.
Maybe in your world but its us Jews who decide not YOU or YOUR world...or any false flag trojan horse `Jews`...got it? Good......
I am still waiting for anyone to tell me the last time a country was attacked - repeatedly - won in wars of self-defense and then the losing side got the land back. IT NEVER HAPPENED IN THE ENTIRE ANNALS OF HISTORY. The victor makes the demands - not the loser. Tell me - when was the last time so-called palestinians ruled over what is now Israel? NEVER. How can they justify claims to our land? Israel desperately needs to educate the world because the world only hears the arab lies. Enough already with the lies. You cannot build peace on a heap of lies.
whistle DIXIE?
Palestine borders: West Israel South Saoudi Arabia East Irak North Syria Jordan is Palestine and Olmert a chief crook .
if israel had any sense it would give the pals the 67 borders....with cast iron guarantees for security in return.... but will israel see the light? doubtful. eventually it will be the 67 borders ...... wait a little longer, then the 48 borders.... wait even longer, then no borders and no israel
As usual, it is painful to read your ignorant posts, Jeff. 1. If you know that Abbas is stating the West Bank area as 205 sq. km larger than the CIA states, what could be the reason? Jeff's answer: "Abbas must be adding in the no-man`s land areas. Wow, he really tries to push things over the cliff by making excessive demands". Stupid answer. Yes-man's land or no-man's land belongs to somebody. (How wide is a mathematical border, Jeff?) How about another answer: Abbas is adding his share of the Dead Sea? Would it be too difficult for you to look up the Green Line Map and estimate the area in Palestine? (Clue; 205 sq km is the right order of magnitude.) 2. "What Abbas forgot was that the Green Line around the Gaza Strip was replaced by another armistice line". Jeff, if you know that then Abbas knows it even better. How many fools do you think exist here? You fall into this assumption as an easy escape instead of trying to understand what the motivation was for the Let me ask you Jeff, how many fools do you know? (Clue: There aren't many that are more foolish than you are.) Instead of looking for stupid answers try to understand political motivations of people. Read books about politics to expand your horizons and may be you will get it.
Tosefta, Do you really think Bibi will make any peace deal? Or, if Barak wins by placing himself to the right of Bibi, will he? Abbas is trying to position his 'demands' where Hamas stands, and thus survive the inevitable failure of the upcoming No Peace Non-Summit.
To the victor go the spoils, not to the loser. That's the way it works. Israel captured that land in a war in which they were attacked by Arabs, not the other way around. To educate the stubborn among us like Clickfool and Tareq, Palestinians are, by and large, nothing more than displaced Jordanian refugees left over from wars started WITH Israel BY Arabs. That is an undisputable fact, and one that most people are either unaware of, or unwilling to accept. The Israelis are willing to compromise to a degree, but there is no chance the Palis will run these negotiations.
Lakshimi, Why not also my little sister as a bonus ? Wake up, lad !
I pity the Israeli side. Even in the ABSOLUTE BEST CASE scenario with ABBAS, they will still have to deal with Hamas & their likes who prefer to sacrifice their childen to the IDOL OF HATRED rather than give a Jew one square inch of Palestine. As long as Hamas EXISTS, peace can NOT exist between Israel and Palestine.
complain that your olive trees were cut down: truth doesn't matter. Complain your village was ethnically cleansed. You'll get your villa
"It wouldn`t be hostile territory if they stopped using it as a launching pad for their missiles. " There are no missiles fired from the West Bank, yet there are constant IDF incursions and killings, even while peace negotiations are supposed to be going on.
"Akshully, the unfortunate result of Brit politics is that the guvmint would like to make colonials of their own people now. You`ve come so far..." I assume you're trying to be clever Josh, but it just comes out a bit lame. Write intelligently and we can have a proper conversation. I love America, though I hate Bush and Cheney. I was just responding to terrornator's strange ass-whipping obsession. see 108.
Camp David, Clinton Parameters, Taba, Tennet, Mitchel, Geneva Initiative, Road Map... They all presented the same solutions. It has been lack of political will (understandable from the Israeli side due to terrorism, specially after wihdrawing from Gaza) and not understandable from the Palestinian side, which has more to gain from it that Israel. So what's so outrageous about Abbas' negotiating trench? It's the same as charted in all of the above recipes for a final settlement.
Let me correct a few inaccuracies in your post. Barak did not get colf feet on the Palestinian track; he got cold feet with the Syrians (in Shepherdstown). Barak was afraid of Israelis' reaction for giving back the Golan, but as far as the Palestinian track, Barak is a model of courage, more or less. Olmert suffers from some problems. He is completely inexperienced in Security and Foreign Affairs, and yet his self-confidence (aka hubris) is so great that he believes he can re-invent the wheel and needs nobody's help. This is how he got himself into a war in Lebanon, and this is how he is running the negotiations with Abbas; all done personally by Olmert and nobody else, and it shows. A man like this is not a strong leader but a foolish one, and he cannot pretend to be strong. As far as "crushing" the extremists, Abbas no longer needs to do that; a gift from Olmert the foolish. Abbas has no control over Gaza and Olmert is happy about it. In Israel we will have to see how the extremists are handled. At this point, the problem is with the less extreme Olmert-types, not the settler extremists.
before they continue to blabber they should free Shalit and the two others they have in custody
We thank you for burning that despicable white house, Michael. I'm glad you took credit for it, even though you 'weren't there are(sic) the time.' We'll be whipping your assets (no S&M here, take it easy) pretty much anytime you'd like. Akshully, the unfortunate result of Brit politics is that the guvmint would like to make colonials of their own people now. You've come so far...
Abbas has just made a demand for every millimeter of the West Bank, plus some so-called no man's land, plus Gaza, plus a corridor linking Gaza and the West Bank, running inside Israel, and there is no response from anyone in the government of Israel. It seems to me that Israel has allowed the debate to be defined by Abbas, who has the entire Arab world backing him, plus the Europeans, and in large measure the Americans. Israel must present its own plan publicly, and urgently. Israel cannot allow the other side to frame the debate completely, or else there will be no room for negotiations at all.
They are even demanding land beyond pre-1967 borders, which the Haaretz article conveniently omits. Check out the post on JPost.com
That is the longitude and latitude for Jordan which is Arab Palestine. It's population is majority ( 75%) palestinian. It comprises 77% of the British Palestine Mandate. Israel- with all of Judea Samaria and the Golan comprise the remaining 23%. To create a second Palestine on the lands of Judea Samaria and Gaza is to reduce the Jewish percentage of the Mandate to 13% giving Arabs 87% and replacing the original designation of the Jordan River with a fake line that was determined by Arab wars of aggression. An Arab state in Judea Samaria and a possible second one in Gaza will spell the doom of Israel. Missiles won't be needed to destroy Israel. Just political decisions by fools who cannot see either the Past or the Future.
I AM stopping it now, and as our population continues to double every 10 years even when governments oppose us, nobody around around here isworried about us continuing to do so in the future. Jewish wombs beat terrorist bombs because Allah wills it; in Kiryat Ono as well as Kiryat Arba. While we're on the subject, if you know of any donors who want to donate a beit knesset for us in our community, please let me know; same with a good building contractor to build LOTS of houses (without using Arab labor, of course) because here, supply is FAR outweighed by demand. Kiryat Ono's growth rate simply can't compare to ours,and that won't change any time soon.
A brilliant and stinging reply to Clickfool! I trust (hope?) the negotiators on the Israeli side will be tough, demanding, and steely-eyed, but not fanatical zealots like some of these ridiculous posters ("Not one square millimeter of God's land to murderers!!!!").
"you brits are the world leaders in colonization,so don`t come here whining about what america did." If you actually read before writing, you'd see that I made the point that the Brits are the world experts on colonising and on ending occupation. I think you'll also find there were only two wars, not three before 1967 and Israel helped start the 1957 one. The 1967 borders are almost inevitable as the basis of a final agreement. As you would say, get over it. "you still pissed because we whipped your asses twice?" Not particularly. I wasn't there are the time. You still pissed that we burnt the White House and supplied much of what is good about America, like democracy, law etc. etc.?
Israel has gone through five wars with your people. Isn't that enough? You should be paying US and not expecting us to fund your country. Time the Pals grew up and acted like adults instead of crying to the world and expecting to have everything done for them. You amaze me. The pals blow up our children and say WE committed gross injustices.
I think the journalist made a mistake, He wrote ABAS AIDES, When he obviously wanted to say ABAS AIDS, Meaning ABAS has AIDS, OMG that is the second one! I guess to be qualified to be a Palestinian president you have to have AIDS What was that Arafat doing in insulation?
What you should care about is what Hamas is doing with Gaza. They should have used it for the good of the people. They've made it an arsenal instead filled with miserable people. There's no industry and even the few miserable potatoes that they manage to grow can't be exported because nobody wants to handle them in case they're boobytrapped. They made their own problems. It wouldn't be hostile territory if they stopped using it as a launching pad for their missiles. They define its role by their own actions. They should give us Shalit and stop the missiles and they'd be on the road to what you're asking for. Their problem: their decision.
Abbas is nuts! And so will Olmert & Co. be if they yield this lunacy. Maybe they should look at the map to get an understanding of where terror would be in full bloom. Give Abbas a free trip to Disneyland and them send him & his co-conspirators to Jordan where they belong. Selah!
Israel - takes occupied land Israel - takes and bulldozing Palestinian land (at times bulldozings American Citizens) Israel - takes 7 Million dollars a day in USA aid (not including on countries aid) Israel = Give Me "WELFARE" State!!
You're a negative influence. You are only concerned to express your anger and your hatred. You obviously don't care if there is ever peace in the ME because you're doing fine where you are: just as long as we all know your attitude. You have never made one positive or conciliatory comment. You're part of the problem. You're the worst kind of Palestinian, bloody minded and not interested in real peace and the solution is to ignore you.
After all the wars the Arabs started against Israel - and lost - you want the world to see Israel as the belligerant party. Great sense of humor you've got there: did you buy it at a garage sale?
I am in favour of an underground tunnel for the Palestinians at the very most: we need to know we're safe in our own country. Salaam
FOR YOUR SHORT SIGHTED STATEMENT ,AND DEMOGRAPHICALLY SPEAKING , IT NEEDS NO INTELLIGENCE TO FIGURE THIS ONE OUT . IT IS IN ISRAELS BEST INTEREST TO SECURE A PEACE TREATY . THE SOONER ,THE BETTER . FORGET ABOUT CARVING CONCRETE RUBBISH . IT IS PRIME TIME TO DO IT BEFORE HELL BREAKS LOOSE IN THE MIDDLE EAST !?!
How can they demand when there lucky to be alive. There will never be peace when the weaker country sets out demands.
Your Sensibilities Harbour Insensible sides of yourself, #120. Many in this thread have pointed out the inability of a nation to exist in pieces with no 'safe harbor' that they border. In this case, that harbor would be a friendly nation. Gaza has Egypt, the West Bank has Jordan. What is interesting, is that this fecklessness of allowing Israel to exist, is not clutched tight to the bosom of just the jihadiis and fundamentalists. I know a thoroughly modern Arab girl who doesn't wear the veil, goes dancing, smokes and in every way seems just like a 'normal' European girl. The one difference is the desire for a World Islamic Conference of Nations (all the world), and a desire for the non-existance of Jews. It ain't just the wild-eyed fanatics anymore, folks.
It was never theirs? Tell me when so-called palestinans ever had legal dominion over Jerusalem? Jerusalem was built by King David, stolen from us by Rome, acquired by Ottoman Empire and Britain - and then promised to be returned to us in the 1918 British White Paper. IT BELONGS TO US! It's bad enough more than two thirds was given to the Hashemite King but to ask us to give up any more is criminal. The arabs waged war against Israel how many times and lost how many times - under what law are they entitled to ANYTHING? When in history has a country been attacked - repeatedly, won in wars of self-defense and then expected to give back territory? NEVER? The land belongs to us.
In yoour opinion ( and you are the resident idiot here) when is Hamas and Fatah going to make up? Before or after YOUR HOPED FOR WITHDRAWAL?
These are opening demands. Israel also will have similar big demands. Faces will sour at first. Then the third parties will come in and soften the demands. These will continue for a while until a peace will be reached or negotiations will break and bloodshed will peak. (Hopefully the first). In the process Israel will ask for a real peace with normalized friendly relations, end of terrorist attacks, incitement, arms smuggling etc. a phased implementation to build confidence. If all goes well there will be some consensus somewhere in the middle. Based on his Camp David and Taba experience Abbas and his team already know how much they can realistically get. The fact that he came out with a number of square kilometers is a good start from the point of view of map. If he can be realistic about the right of return, Jerusalem and the holy sites there may be some hope here. But lets not build too much hope too early and lets prepare that these talks have as much chance to fail as success and in that event lets stay cool and not go back to bloodshed again.
Many arabs see abbas as a traitor for even talking to Olmert. What happens if Israel gives up land only to have abbas assasinated by his own people? Who will be in control of the palestinain land then? We could very easily have 2 hamistans - in Gaza and Judea. Would you want hamas in control of the Temple Mount, rendering both East & West Jerusalem uninhabitable for Jews? Rockets from Hebron hitting Tel Aviv? They had their chance for a country in 1948 and said no. Now Israel must say no to them. They already have a palestinian state in Jordan on more then two-third of the original area promised by Britain in 1918 to become the Jewish homeland. Jews should not have to relinquish another inch.
Will I get it? When you grow up, you learn that you can't get all you want.. That applies to both sides.
You are quite correct in your thoughts and progressions. The war IS to annihilate the Jews, but it also is to either convert or kill the rest of the world, too. An example: In the border areas of Brazil, Bolivia and Argentina, there is a stronghold where factions of several different Jihadist militias/armies have been gathering and building up their military strength for a number of years. It started just with a mosque 'to teach our dozen small children about Islam, so they don't lose their faith' but it has blossomed into a jihadist stronghold. The government troops don't want to go anywhere nearby. The goal...well, there are many Jews in Israel and Argentina, and they want to 'rid themselves of this disease,' as they put it. Also, they're mainly Catholics in these countries, and very influenced by people with guns.
At last, a clear proposal acceptable to all who really want peace. Peace for the occupied land. Can Abbas and Olmert implement it on their sides with considerable fundamentalist opposition they nurtured themselves? This is the crucial test in the Middle East. Problem: what about the refugees? How a compromise in this issue look like?
Thanks for the smile you brought to my lips, Joe. I hadn't realised that Canada had land rights in Judea. That's a new one.
For the sake of justice, Bush, Blair, Rice, Olmert, Peres, Livni - all Americans, Europeans and Israelis involved in stealing Jewish land for expansionist Islam, must move to Sderot. Why should they be deprived of the results of their peace agreements? US/EU/UN are eager to duplicate in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem the terrorist success of Gaza, LAND FOR WAR: the Jew-cleansed areas of Gaza have been transformed into global terrorist training grounds and rocket firing sites into Israeli communities. In Sderot, Israeli terrified peace process victims offered up as sacrifices - live in continual fear of constant daily rocket attacks. Their desperate pleas for help are cruelly ignored! The immoral peace process based on venomous Jew-hate and ruthless, forcible ethnic Jew-cleansing-REQUIRES Jews to ACCEPT being maimed and MURDERED! Stop the planned second Holocaust of Jews! Stop a Global Islamic TERROR State in Israel!
If my memory serves me correctly, Ben Gurion Airport is about ten kilometers (five miles) from the pre-1967 borders (green line.) Being that Mahmoud Abbas could not stop the quassam rockets from Gaza (even when Fatah was in control of Gaza), what makes us think that the quassam rockets will be stopped after Abbas takes over the West Bank? Oh, I forgot, the quassams are just firecrackers.
The CIA World Factbook says that the land area of the West Bank is 5,640 sq. Km. and that of the Gaza Strip is 360 sq. Km. for a total of exactly 6000 sq. Km. Where did the extra 205 sq. Km. come from? Abbas must be adding in the no-man's land areas. Wow, he really tries to push things over the cliff by making excessive demands (which he is no position to be making in the first place). Remember when Abbas was trying to claim that Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip would not be complete unless Israel also withdrew from a 2 Km. by 9 Km. strip of land at the northern end of the Gaza Strip because it was on the Arab side of the 1949 armistice line? What Abbas forgot was that the Green Line around the Gaza Strip was replaced by another armistice line in accordance with the Egyptian-Israeli Territorial Exchange Agreement of 1950 in which Egypt ceded the 18 sq. Km. in the north in exchange for a larger area in the southeast corner where the Gaza International Airport is today.
I very much agree with what u said. That is one problem with Israeli politics, it gives too loud a voice for extremists. Olmert should set the example of a strong Israeli leader and not follow the footsteps of Barak, who got cold feet at the last minute and ruined peace talks for seven years now and caused the death of thousands. The problem is that it takes every israeli prime minister 4 years to get over their stubborness and realize that the Palestinians ARE serious about peace...it always happens right before it's time for elections again and they end up having to drop the whole thing. Abbas and Olmert, now is the time..crush the extremists.
Every year, the US taxpayer-funded Palestinian Authority CELEBRATE the 9/11 murders of 3,000 American innocents. See: http://pmw.org.il/Bulletins_sep2007.htm#b170907 It is evident, that the military training the US eagerly gives to the PA/PLO will one day be used against Americans. Fully aware of PA intense hate for Jews and Americans and the Islamic goal of conquest of Israel and Jewish annihilation, pro-Islam, pro-terror US DELIBERATELY finance, arm and militarily train the barbaric PA/PLO terrorist organization who have MURDERED MORE JEWS than HAMAS. The US/EU with the aid of treasonous Jew-hating Israelis and the cooperative, powerful world media, have incredibly brokered agreements with savage global terrorists as "peace". The naive fail to understand that US/EU/UN/Islam's "peace" refers to the peace resulting from a second Holocaust of Jews. STOP Inciting Children to Murder! http://www.teachkidspeace.com/flash.php
Every square foot of land Israel concedes will immediately be used as a staging area for attacks against Israel's scant remaining lands. Israel should go to war or surrender and rejoin the diaspora. Because your neighbors will acknowledge nothing less. There is no peace with genocidists.
How dare Abbas demand anything! The West Bank and Gaza are Israeli land won in war. The Palestinians on it have NO RIGHTS and no ability to demand land. They didn't want what they got under the Oslo Accords or what Barak later offered to Arafat (99% of what Abbas currently demands). The only logical answer to Abbas's "demand" is a counter demand- stop terror, dismantle terror networks, surrender all weapons and explosives, and pay reparations to Israeli victims of terror.
Arabs refused the partition, what made them change their mind???
Stop telling Israel what it has to do--- Arabs never went along with any UN resolution-- They violated the UN Partition Plan, the '49 Armistice Agreement, and any other thing they put they're signature on---I see you've be away quite a while...Traitor school??
THIS ISRAELI GOVERNMENT TO EVEN COMMENT ON WHAT ABBAS SAID IS AN EMBARRASEMENT,IRAN WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL,SYRIA WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL,HEZBOLLAH WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL,HAMAS CONTINUES TO QASSAM ISRAEL EVERY DAY,IDF SOLDIERS MAKE NIGHTLY RAIDS IN RAMALLAH AND SURRONDING SITES TO STOP SUICIDE BOMBS AND WE HAVE ABBAS MAKING DEMANDS, IT'S TIME TO GET RID OF OLMERT,HE IS AN EMBARRASMENT AND THE GANG OF SCHLEPPERS FROM SHAS ARE A JOKE,THEY PUT TEFFILIM ON EVERY DAY AND THEY SUPPORT A GUY LIKE OLMERT AND COMPANY,SAD DAY FOR ISRAEL
colonization,so don't come here whining about what america did.what,you still pissed because we whipped your asses twice?if it wern't for the brits and the french f88king up the middle east,by their colonization years ago,we wouldn't have the mess there,we have now.you, and all you muslim appeasers say the end result for peace would be the 67 borders but you and i know thats B.S..if that were the case,why were there 3 wars between israel and the arabs before the 67 war?what makes you think the 67 borders will fix everything?by the way,we spanked your english asses because you were trying to colonize america,just like you tried to do to the rest of the world.get over it michael,boy!
Roberta, if you consider Israel's leaving Gaza and the continuing rocket fire as a portent for future peace, forget it, it ain't gonna happen---It will only bring the terrorists closer to the Israeli heartland---Five thousand rockets have already been fired at Israel since she left Gaza---
There is very little new here. Following Camp David, President Clinton proposed that the Palestinians will get a net of 97% of the West Bank (after territorial exchange), with the missing 3% counted against the use of a road connecting Gaza and WB and some use of the Ashdod port. Both Israel and Arafat accepted the parameters and conducted the Taba talks (Jan 2001) on that basis. The talks were suspended before the Israeli elections, in which Sharon replaced Barak as PM and put an end to peace talks. We are returning to a very similar situation. The Palestinians have gotten there after many years. Likudniks took a longer time. Olmert was elected in 2006 on his plan to have the "wall" as a final border, giving the Palestinians some 92% of WB. He is up to 94% now. I hope the next Israeli Prime Minister returns faster to the reality of 2000 and finishes the job.
Your deranged comments about abbas and the degree to which you personalise this, tells me you are trying to get some kind of vicarious sense of power by being more palestinian than the palestinians , maybe to compensate for deep seated feelings of powerlesness in your own life??? Its wierd clickfool, its really wierd to have a middle class brit screaming at a man who has risked his life for years for his people,calling him a coward.Abbas has been through things that would make you feint in a second.
zionist,in your post and it would be closer to the truth.there's no such place as palestine and never will be until the pals start act like human being instead of terrorist.
can we agree that the Arab world cease being one of the largest arms importers in the world?? Do you lose sleep over the french british german and sweedish arms industries?? No I didnt think so.
All the illegal arab occupiers of jewish land in Judea and Samaria and the Israeli arabs must be transfered to Jordan.They have no legal rights to occupy one inch of jewish land. The great majority of these illegal occupiers settled in Israel during the Ottoman Empire occupation of our land 1415-1915. When the Ottoman Empire occupation ended in 1915 all the rights of the illegal arab occupiers to any land became nul and void.The Ottoman empire occupied Bulgaria Romania, Albania, Serbia, Hungaty,Slovakia .When these occupied lands were liberated all the rights of the occupiers became nul and void.The Palestinians has as much right to claim Jerusalem as Budapest or Belgrade or Sofia or Bucharest. If Syria ,Egyipt,Iraq,Lybia and the other arab countries who expelled jews and stole their properties pays a fair compensation to the jewish fefugees than some compensation can be paid to the Palestinians. Abbas is a Holocaust denier Hamas supporter terroristThe USA made him a Saint.
Comments like comparing gaza to a concentration camp is why you find it so hard to be taken seriously here.Think about it.
Gaza is shut off? You have got to be kidding, or are you just an agent provocateur who is stirring up malarky? Your use of 'concentration' camps is despicable, Ibrahim. No doubt you'd like to see some in place? Show Ahmadinejab that there was, and can be again, a Holocaust? Gaza is connected to Egypt, and it has some of the best seashore of the Eastern Mediterranean. When logic doesn't work, baffle 'em with bullshit.
That is exactly what abbas is doing, too bad so many like you keep trying to put him down, he knows just what to do.
This is News? The Arab world announced its intentions in Khartoum to destroy Israel in stages, and they have been succeeding ever since. They brought and army into Israel. The gained control of certain areas. Now, they want to expand their control to more areas, then more, then more. Has anyone spoken about a declaration of 'end of conflict' , i.e. at what point will Abbas declare the conflict as finished. Of course, he is irrelevent, since he is not supported by a mojority of Palestinians and leaders of Arab countries. Whoever is next will declare the conflict is not over until their next demand is met.
Last time after Israel left ALL GAZA and kicked out 10,000 of its citizens fom their homes Palestinians OVERWHELMINGLY voted in Hamas. If Israel gives up over 95% of West Bank and divides Jerusalem and maybe even Old City, why wouldn't they re-elect Hamas and have Hamas sit on the gains made by Abbas. In 1948 Jordanian long range guns were on the Mount Of Olives, which overlooks the Old CIty and parts of West Jerusalem. Will Palestinians now put their rocket launchers there, as they do in Gaza?! Will Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Al Aqsa gunmen fire now from atop the Old City walls, as snipers fired at Jewish civilians in 1948 as well as 1967?! Is Israel deciding its needs and National Jewish rights or RICE?
you must like fighting.its a shame you don't live with your pal,pals,maybe your demands would soften.
And how are you going to stop it?? I hear Kiyrat Ono is the place to buy these days.
Howdy Cynic #2; You and other Palestinian supporters invariably make the mistake of referring to the boundary between Israel and the Palestinian Territories prior to the Six-Day War as a border. It wasn't a border at all; it was a temporary armistice line.
So, explain to me what has changed in the Pals demands? This is ridiculous, people accuse the Israelis of creating obstacles to peace...last time I checked, not changing any demands of an unsuccessful negotiation will probably not result in a different result the next time around.
It is pretty obvious, Steve, that you are symptomatic of your electorate...those who vote in a viper into the midst of the US Congress. Now you want Israel to carve itself up. Perhaps that'll make the overall economy of the region better, so that makes it ok? You and your Minneosta brethren are fools.
There should be a firm stance not to give back Jerusalem. I'm all for giving up some of the west bank, as long as we have the right to take it back if ANYTHING SERIOUS goes wrong. Giving east Jerusalem would provide a base for our enemies that lies right next door. Not a good idea if you ask me.
" I would concentrate on defending the State of Israel and promoting the scientific and cultural good that it does." David, I agree with the essence of your post. In terms of promoting the "good" that Israel does, can we agree that Israel should stop being one of the largest arms exporters to the world? Like you said, God is not always silent.
When all is said and done regarding the pre 1967 war THEN the Palestinian party begins. Just as the Palestinian Arabs attacked innocent Jews for over 70 YRS up until 1967 war BEFORE OCCUPIED LANDS/ BEFORE EAST JERUSALEM / BEFORE 1967 BORDERS (da!) so too will Hamas and ALL their voters will announce a resounding 'NEXT'. Maybe Hams will justify their GUARANTED continuation of the murder of any innocent Jewish man woman or child behind the lying excuse of the Pre 1948 borders. They'd love to go back to the 7th century, the time Muslims believe the world was created.
Since Abbas is demanding that the clock be rolled back, why stop at 1967? He might as well demand that the borders be rolled back 60 years or so to agree with the geography lessons he's teaching his children.
Abbas can promote all he wants of a myth that many believe is true.However,when Arab parties have fought wars in '48,'56,'67,'70 and '73 in attempts to destroy the Jewish state,the Pals would have to have the best public relations firm in the world, which is adept at lying,to prove that Israel is the aggressor.
I would expect the money to build any tunnel and port would come from somewhere like the EU. Maybe Jordan could chip in, because they would be using this rail link to access the Med. And those nice Saudis could pay for it, given the fact that Bush has made sure that the price of oil is kept good and high for them. One general point: there will be peace one day, no matter how brutalised and hate filled people on both sides are. Fifty, seventy or even one hundred years of conflict does not mean that it will go on forever. England and France were at war on and off for nearly five hundred years before 1815. Peace could happen in one year or in a hundred, but the more people are willing to at least talk, the sooner it's likely to be.
Hello - I am an American Jew and strong supporter of Israel. I think this is a fine starting point for negotiations. I completely respect Abbas's position. He is clarifying what he wants, but he will compromise, just as the Israelis must compromise. An eventual negotiated settlement will likely have the Israelis retaining a large portion of their settlements and reciprocating by giving equal size and value Israeli land to Palestine. The agreement must include insurance that peace will be upheld and clear consequences, ratified by the UN, if the peace is violated. I wish Abbas and Olmert luck in their negotiations. Ignore the extremists on both sides who wish to derail any agreement and peaceful co-existence. As regards "splitting" Israel with a WB-Gaza road, creative solutions can be worked out so that a tunnel or elevated highway for either party enables the free flow of movement across the two states. Chop chop fellas. Lets get to it.
The Arab peace initiative does not call for the right of return but for a just solution of the refugee problem in accordance with resolution 194, which can also imply compensation. This is very different. This was an olive branch held out to the Israelis.
Olmert has all the signs of being a traitor. Allowing the terrorists to have a land bridge between the WB and Gaza, plus his criminal showing in Lebanon last year equals Traitor. If the citizens of Israel allow this, it will become known as the former israel.
You want Israel to pay for Palestinian transportation methods? I thought you were all for Palestinian independence! Sure Israel might have the money, but I'm sure they have much better things to spend the money on, like schools, security, food, etc. First you want land, and now you're asking for Israeli money so you can build up the land? And you call me shortsighted? Why should Israel even consider that idea? Its not their fault that the entire Arab world was going to invade in 1967. And its not their fault that Gaza and the Westbank were and are a major security risk to them? And as far as Gaza is concerned, as long as Palestinians are launching rockets into Israel from Gaza, then yeah I think it should stay isolated. Fighting a one front war is bad enough, let alone a two front.
Howdy Ron; You said, "If this is his starting position O.K...If it is his bottom line, Israel should forget Annopolis..." That's about it, but how can one tell? Israel should counteroffer with 100% of the Gaza Strip, 92% of the West Bank, and the Arab Quarter of East Jerusalem and see if Abbas is willing to compromise between the two positions. If he is, then a deal might be possible. If he isn't going to budge on his demands, then the status quo will just continue indefinitely.
Ahhh, yea, okay hahahahahahahahah
capital & ROR !
Of course Israel doesnt need to do anything. That is what it has been doing with the WB since 1967. Nothing. Oh, of course they have done everything possible to change the land ownership and demographics so they can claim they must keep it all. The recent deceit over further pieces of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem attest to this. Israel can continue to do nothing if it chooses. But thenn it must accept the consequences of its decisions. Further isolation as it slides further into an apartheid state as all occupiers eventually must do, and face ever increased animosity from a growing number of nations. But the Palestinians must have the lands of the June 1967 borders simply because such has been designated by UN Resolutions and further because this is a compromise on the part of the Palestinans and the world knows it.
if israel really wanted peace they would have done it a long time ago. It suits them to have no peace and occasionally suffer losses, not as much as the palestians. they r losing lives every day because of the zionists racists. all zionists have no hearts they just care about money and power. doesnt matter who dies along the way. no palestine, no peace thats what they want
I am guessing Israel and the US with UN funds would build the connection between Gaza and the West Bank. Maybe you didn't know, but there is already a road linking the two...You aren't suggestin Gaza remain forver isolated from the world? Don't you remember the days of the concentration camps? You wouldn't want to bring that back would you, only this time with the Jewish people serving as watchguards? Brighten up your vision, my friend. Israel had the funds to build all sorts of bypass roads/tunnels in the West Bank...surely they can find some funds to help undo the gross injustice they've created the last 40 years. Take Care
I have bo doubt, that in the end, it will be the Israeli people who reject the peace deal. They dont realy want peace, they want to hold on to their "God given" real estate. They also prefer to live surrounded by enemies then economic and diplomatic partners. Living in peace with your neighbors is antithesis with being a Zionist.
Zionists won't concede on any point that is fair or just? What would be fair about giving a foundation to people who want to wipe you from the face of this earth? What would be fair about giving land back that you took to defend yourself when it seemed that the entire Arab world was going to try and wipe you off the face of the earth. Where is the justice in giving in to people who blow themselves up on buses just to kill Israelis? Where is the justice in negotiating with a government that is holding an ISRAELI soldier hostage? And what does Israel get out of negotiating anyway? Where is the negotiating part on the part of the Palestinian? What does he have to give Israel that Israel should even consider negotiating with them on something as important as land? There aren't any fair and just answers to those questions, and yet Israel is still listening to you. So stop whining that you don't have everything you want, news flash, NO ONE DOES!
I am sick of people posting about the Gaza withdrawal as though it was such a noble move by the Israeli government. Everyone knows the withdrawal was part of a larger idea of unilateral action by Israel and disregard to negotiations with the Palestinians. The only reason Israel withdrew from Gaza was due to its heavy palestinian population density and the fact that all is Israel cares about is its jewish identity. Palestinians never wanted the withdrawal, they wanted a comprehensive peace deal that would include such a withdrawal and exclude declaring it a hostile territory and continuing the cross-border fighting (and before you call me an anti-semite, I am not denying the palestinians' part to blame for this cross-border fighting). Palestinians want a real peaceful agreement, with concessions on both sides and abiding by the internationally recognized U.N resolutions.
Two things have to happen here to forge a good beginning to negotiations. First, Olmert has to come up with an official proposal of what is to be kept and what is to be given back in answer to Abbas so that the Palestinians can see some response besides the anarchic usurping of more land that is occurring on the ground. There is a lot more than land to be talked about here. No land is going to be given back without a period of quiet on both sides. A gradual process and schedule needs to be drawn up where dismantling checkpoints, halting military action, and stopping all settlement expansion and further land annexation are done in exchange for a total halt in hostilities. This is not all going to happen at once. What is being presented now are starting points only, and people would do well to remember that. The first stage of that is a halt to settlement expansion in excuahge for a period of quiet. JUST DO IT.
If I were the Israeli leader and government I would grant all the Palestinian demands and would put one of my own before any aggreement. That Hamas and other terror groups renounce thier clause's etc that call for Israels destruction and demand they recognise Israels right to exist. I would then agree to Palestinian demands. Demographically Jews are needed in Israel and Israel needs to think of this carefully. If God is silent, God is silent. If he speaks he speaks and when he does his enemies will know about it. The Nazis may have massacred 6 million Jews but Germany lost 10 million and Europe was burned to the Ground. Give it a thought those who are oppossed to negotiation. God is not as silent as you think, Israelis need more faith as we all do. Israel's time will come but let God decide it, meantime I would concentrate on defending the State of Israel and promoting the scientific and cultural good that it does.
Good idea! But I imagine that the palestinians would expect Israel to build it for them along with the port in Gaza. Can you imagine 100 years after there is peace between the palestinians and Israel? The palestinians will still be living in squalor and taking handouts from whoever is prepared to contribute. Just like Egypt today!
Les Israliens n'ont pas des voleurs. Ils ont gagne 2 guerres que les Arabes ont commence. Cette information existe sur l'internet! Ouvrez vos yeux et votre cerveau s'il existe.
Abbas can sell his own house but Palestine is not his property.
Let him have a referendum if he dares.
I can't get over how disconnected the people are in camp Zion. "Return to 67 border"? Gee, here is something Zionists never heard before. Let me count the ways - of all the UN resolutions and General Assembly votes on that very issue but that will take longer than the 40 year occupation to complete. Zionists will stretch this thing out til the second coming of Christ. They will haggle over what is IS and argue over every pebble, rock and grain of sand until Abbas white hair turns to black again. Zionists won't ever CONCEDE on any point that is remotely FAIR OR JUST. That's their bloody nature. I hope I'm wrong but skimming over some of the posts here it appears I'm actually being too charitable in my remarks. I personally don't understand what is there to be negotiated. What part of get the %#$@%% out don't Zionist understand?
The road from Hebron to Gaza was built many years ago and its nature always gave me thought that it was built in a way to accommodate a future land corridor. Since before the destruction of Gush Katif even in its zenith of prosperity there existed an area that from a logistic point of view is a "tank terrain barrier" that stretches for killometers at one of the junctions that Israeli vehicles were checked on their journey to the Gush. It appeared to me though to be a preparation for a land swap in negotiations with the PALS even contemplated way back when Rabin was on the road to Oslo 2. The crime in all this is that the civilian population was oblivious to these machinations and continued with their normal Zionistic nation building. Call it Globalization. In the end the Jews will pay.....thats normal.
And who will pay for the construction of all these high ways and tunnels? Do you think Israel has the money to start all this stuff up, just so the Palestinians get what they want? When has Palestine actually done something for Israel that even warrants such a construction project. Building a complex tunnel highway system costs money! Besides, having this concept gives Palestinian terrorists an easy target. And don't even try to argue that there won't be terrorists if Israel caves in to Abbas' demands. These demands won't stop until 1948 never happened, if you catch my drift.
I'm struggling to see what Israel gets here. They get promises from Abbas and some Arab states that they won't kill Israelis anymore? What about Islamic Jihad? Hezbollah? Hamas? These 3 groups will continue to kill Israelis after the Terror state of 'Palestine' is declared, whilst the Pals and Arab countries will shrug their shoulders and say it has nothing to do with them. Get real, this is national suicide.
That is be a wonderful idea! Fatah and Hamas militants would then be able to battle each other and leave Israel in peace. The Palestinians can not live in peace with each other. How does anyone honestly expect that they will ever to live in peace with others?
We all know that we won't be seeing serious, detailed, technical proposals from the Israelis, who are desperately trying to keep this game on the level of vague declarations of processes.... Abbas must take the initiative and generate a map with proposed borders...AND PROMOTE IT TO THE WORLD. The Palestinians only hope is to isolate Israel, expose her as the belligerent party, and spark large pressure on Israel to comprimise.
Jasmine, I fully understand you are on the side of continued conflict and Israel land expansion...but still, you should be properly informed. A safe land route between Gaza and the West Bank will not cut Israel in half. We are talking about an elevated highway. Israelis can drive in tunnels underground. If you look at the map of Israel's wall, especially around, say, Tulkarem...you will Israel expects the same of the Palestinians. That is the legacy of the Israeli occupation...strange, gerrymandered borders to allow their colonies to remain in tact. Shalom.
Israel should say NO to the usurpers. What makes the Islamist-Jihadists think that they have a right to usurp Israel from the Jews? It is time for Israel to tell them to go to HELL.
You have to wonder if this is what Iran has in mind when they call for Israel to be wiped off the map. With Syria making demands for the Golan Heights, and the Palestinians demanding they want a state of their own on Israeli soil, you'd think that all of these guys are doing what Iran wants them to do. Israel keeps giving up its land, there won't be an Israel anymore. I wonder if the government is even taking that idea into consideration? I mean who ever even heard of the term Palestinian anyway before 1967? Now these guys want to come out and say we want our own state, and you have to give us all your land to do it? And I thought Israel doesn't negotiate with terrorists? Because thats what these demands are, blatant terrorism.
but only after the terror networks surrounding Israel have been dismantled, after they stop teaching their children to murder/hate, after there is peace with Syria and after there has been real peace/stability for at least two years. On that basis it may take 100 years before the land will be returned.
Peace????? Peace today with Fatah.Kassam tommorow from Hamas. So that's what we call peace!!! How stupid can we get......
I always thought that Palestinians demanding things from Israel was funny, I mean if you really think about it, Israel doesn't have to give them anything. The army is still fighting Palestinian militants in these regions, and unless Abbas finds a way to end these aggressive acts, Israel should not feel compelled in anyway to listen to any of his demands. Yes peace is a two way street, but there has been very little effort on the part of the Palestinians to say that If you give us this, we'll stop attacking you. I think if Israel should lay down the law for any type of negotiation, with the first step being that Palestine doesn't get anything unless the Rocket attacks stop. If the Palestinians are truly interested in peace with Israel, then this outcome should be easy for them, if they aren't then Israel doesn't have to do or give them anything.
Realistically there will be ultimately some changes. Minor land swaps here and there. I believe most people think the boundaries are not the crux of the matter. The sticking point will be the refugee problem, Israel's insistence on control of the Jordanian border, water rights, and so on. A Gaza-WB highway and rail corridor should be looked upon favorably by Israelis as well as perhaps a boon to southern Israel's economy.
Abbas is not realistic demanding the 1967 borders for the Palestinian state. Israel will not return one inch. He should be demanding the whole of historic Palestine and negotiate from that point. He should think like them, act like them and negotiate like them otherwise he'll only get ....zilch.
You definitely said no RoR. The Saudis didn't say no RoR. Your words to me won't hold water with them. The negotiators said that there'd be no concessions beyond this and no negotiations. Guido you're a good soul wanting to present the best front, I think, but you've been misled. I'm not contemptuous but I am busy and don't like having my time wasted.
Hey I ain't giving my house to no Arab. If you WANT IT COME AND GET IT !!!!
Glad to see that things are moving towards some sort of real discussion. Abbas has made his move publicly. Now let's do some business.
No one seems to talk about a cut-and-cover tunnel between the West Bank and Gaza any more. With a rail tunnel, Israel would lose no land, and there would be free traffic between Gaza and the West Bank. There could be security cameras every hundred yards or so in the finished tunnel so that Israel could make sure no one is digging where they shouldn't be. With a connection to the West Bank and then on to Jordan, Gaza could have a real economic role as a port.
Anything short won't do.
"What about fulfilling the UN Security Resolutions 194, 242, 446, 478, 497...?"... which were adopted by the UN only because of an automatic Arab 22 country support fueled by rabid anti-Israeli policies... Why do you think Israel doesn't relate too seriously about most UN resolutions?
THIS IS WHY THERE WILL BE NO AGREEMENT !
"Where are Abbas` words of outrage about Israel`s plan to steal yet more land for the illegal settlements to the East of Jerusalem." Face it, Clickfool, you don't want peace in this region. You want complaining. You're moaning about 1.1 sq km (1100 dunams). You want the Palestinians to throw a hissy fit over 1/6205th of the land in question. That's less than .015% of the total land area Abbas is talking about. Anyone who takes absolutists positions in these negotiations is going to get nowhere. Should Olmert demand a total ceasation of rocket attacks? Should the Israeli govt. claim that one suicide bombing and the whole deal (if there is one) is off? This 00.015% is like arguing about a penny and a half of a $100.00 item. You must really hate the Palestinians if you think it's better for them to act outraged over that then it is to act mature and end up with a country. Why do you hate them? What did they ever do to you, such that you'd rather they suffer so you can gripe?
Starting today for every kassam or mortar launched into Israel. Israel should take one sq mile of land from the palestinians. And they can choose where that land is. The palestinians have proven for 60 years that they are unfit to govern or control one inch of land....NOT ONE ARAB CAN BE TRUSTED FOR EVERLASTING PEACE
Alaska is separated from the lower 48 states by Canada, but it is joined to it via a very common culture. Allow a land bridge from Gaza to cut across Israel, and a hostile culture will be able to pump weapons in to face all major Israeli (narrow) coastal population centers. Israel will not survive this insanity.
Too many Americans on this board seem to think that war is like a game of poker. You walk away at the end with what you won and it's yours to keep forever. It's probably down to their own experience of colonising the west. However, Gilber, as a membr of a ntion that used to own a quarter of the world, I can tell you that usually it doesn't quite work like that. Israel is gradually losing the battle to hang on to what it occupied in 1967, not the military battle, but the political battle. It has the same effect in the end. Most of the world knows that the end result will be 1967 borders with a few mutually agreed land swaps and a token return of Pals to Israel. It's just a question of how many more die and how many more wars are started before then.
This would have to be the first time in history that the vanquished dictates terms to the conquerer. Just imagine if this were to be done to the Americans by the Japanese in the second world war. Or the Nazis dictating terms to the Russians at the end of WW2. Somewhere along the line Israel had lost it's bearings.
I guess calling us Christ killers, and thieves is your idea of starting a negotiation. If that is the name of the game, why should we play?
Hamas should have been enganged in talks with the West after they were democratically elected. Now, Abbas will get squat from Israel, proving Hamas to be more enlightened of the plight of the Palestinians.
If this is his starting position O.K...If it is his bottom line, Israel should forget Annopolis and Abbas can tell his Pals that it will be another generation of misery.
...between Gaza and the West Bank. Oh wait, that linking highway will serve that purpose. my mistake.
What about fulfilling the UN Security Resolutions 194, 242, 446, 478, 497...?
To save face and lives for both sides on this issue of return of all land to the 1967 borders the parties must explore the concept of Leasebacks. For example, I suggest creating two Leaseback zones: 1.Population center long term "Hong Kong" Leases- applied to those settlement blocs like Ariel or Gush Etzion that permit the inhabitants to remain in Palestinian territory with security provided by the local population and 2. Security Zone Leases applied to areas ("Neutral Zones") deemed necessary to protect Israel from incursion or other attack. This second Zone is leased to an international Development corporation, is supported by the international body and had free trade and tax free status. It is patrolled by international troops in coordination with Israeli monitors. Lease payments for both zones are paid to the Palestinian Authority or successor State. Funds may be used to provide services and housing.
Olmert didn't take charge by a coup. All those who voted for him and all those that encouraged voters (incl. Haaretz) should be well please with themselves - you're getting what you deserve. Pity that the rest of us who actually care about our country will suffer with you.
Israel has developed the act of lying into an art form. olmert's governent is rumoured to be willing to compromise on Jerusalem, then goes ahead and announces it will be seizing more Palestinian land near Ma'ale Adumim, as well as keeping more East Jerusalem residents in limbo. It takes with one hand and promises with the other. Israel can go on until they are blue in the face about their largesse in giving and witholding. But in the final analysis, the UN Security Respolutions must be upheld in this matteer and that means Israel must be made to return all lands taken in 1967, or an equitable land exchange agreed upon by both parties. But the colonial period in Israel's occupation are drawing to a close and what they want or don not want in the bargain will prove irrelevant.
The Israeli's keep losing in the negotiations and wind up giving more than they want and recieve nothing in return. One of the reasons is because Israel states its wilingness to give up large parts of its land even before the negotiations start.
Abbas demands and Olmert gives in and asks if he can hand offer even more. HOW dare a tin pot leader like him carve up the land. If the palis want to carve up Israel I say let them prove first that they can be good neighbors. Until then only give them Gaza and what they currently have of the West Bank. No more and perhaps even less. Certainly no part of Jerusalem. Imagine a launch pad for Qassams in East-Jerusalem.We gave them Gaza and forcibly evicted our own. Now the palis use that land as a launch pad. If we fail to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. Should they prove they can not be good neighbors I think it is time to ignore world opinion. It is time to cut the water, electricity and gas from Gaza. And if that doesn't work to stop the bombings, it is time to use full military force against them. We can not worry about their civilian casualties. They have never worried about ours.
Where are Abbas' words of outrage about Israel's plan to steal yet more land for the illegal settlements to the East of Jerusalem. Where is his threat not to attend the so-called Peace Summit if these plans are not withdrawn? Or am I expecting too much of an Uncle Tom, a man without a bone in his body, a useless, toothless, treacherous embarrassment?
The Israeli leadership has never conducted a successful negotiation for anything. It is clear that the Arabs are masters of the game. They never yield. Israel will always yields as it tries to find some form of acceptance. Israel should say and not depart from its three no- No Jerusalem, No 1967 Borders and no Refugees. End of story.
Abbas can't offer anything and this whole thing is simply for foreign consumption. Both the PA and Israel know that this is just required talk and both no that is going nowhere. Olmert has the Knesset to deal with and Mazen is meaningless - yawn!
If this is his starting position than it is a legitimate offer. Our starting position should be something like 'Greater Israel' with autonomy for the Palestinians. As the Palestinians scale down their demands, we scale down our demands. thiis te way way we negotiate. If this is tre final Palestinian position, then 'no deal'.
more and more are now willing to leave the rest of the west bank in return for peace. if there's peace, it will be worth it. lives come before houses
and the sad part of this story is,that this traitorous,incompotent pathetic fool,who is masquerading as a prime minister,will give it to them. it is all over,either you depose this curse upon israel,and send him packing,or start packing yourselves
Lets think about this. The holocast denier Abbas wants 100 percent of the West Bank and Gaza. When Israel left Gaza what did they get? So evacuate the West Bank and expect more of the same. That is, kassams from Gaza and kassams from the West Bank. Only a fool who forgets recent history would negociate with Abbas.
The present government seem to be on their way to the courts,at last.These people are certainly not the sort of people I would want emptying my garbage let alone negotiating with eloquent and hard headed Arab negotiators.Before these clowns go and make the concessions necessary to obtain Nobel prizes they need to resign in order to get a government in place with a mandate.The French would grab a guillotine and a couple of baskets but in Israel we do things differently.I suggest we go to the ballot boxes as soon as possible and prior to any further damage being done." Let me take you by the hand and lead you back to Binyamina "........
How about reassuring Israelis clearly, and stating to the Arab world that the Palestinians do not want the elimination of the State of Israel. Clearly. Loudly. Renounce terrorism. Clearly. Say no more suicide bombers, no more Kassams launched at civilians. Clearly. No more Anti Semitic cartoons aimed at children. Say the words peaceful neighbors. Clearly. Say no more Jihad. Clearly. No more logos of the entire state of Israel deemed Palestine. Then-and only then-should Israel make the concessions that the Palestinians require. And Israel must address the Settlements and refugees once and for all. OK Dutch, Indrajaya, Clickfool, Hannah, Lakshimi. Show us your venom,your bigotry, & your non compromising radical Islamic bigotry. Let all Haaretz readers get a laugh at the response these individuals will give on this issue. Let all of us see how you have zero interest in peace, & that you will twist every topic into starting your propaganda advocating the elimination of Israel.
If anything at all, their western border will be the Jordan River.
"Lot`s of demands and nothing to offer" YES! Steal everything a person has and when he asks his stuff back say that he's got nothing to offer. Priceless!
The PA (pigs at the trough) demand a connecting corridor from Gaza to WB...this should come at the highest possible cost to them...this corridor will be the entire fulcrum of the PA's power and it should come at the expense of all the other demands by the (still our) ENEMY. This corridor makes or breaks the PA "state...it is Isreal's ONLY bargaining chip. USE IT TO FORCE THE ENEMY (they are not our friend's) to give up the hollow demands they are forcing down our throats...call it the BiBi broadway...dav
Sorry for wasting your precious time making you read the actual text of the Arab peace initiative. Of course there is a reference to 194 as that resolution is one of the legal underpinnings of the Palestinian's case in this conflict. What did you expect? But the indirect diplomatic language makes it clear that there is flexibility. And the Arab negotiators said they would accept any Israeli-Palestinian deal on the issue. This proposal(!) did not deserve the contemptuous treatment reserved for it by the Israeli government (or by you it seems).
since they didn't agree to a land corridor between Reich&East Preussen(1939) thru Poland or a Russian controlled rail link Kalingrad-Russia thru Letland. How come you haven't appealed to the HM Goverment to support Russia's claims? After all Russian inhabitants of Kaliningrad ,completely surrounded by the Baltic states need to have a corridor to the motherland.
If he thinks he can take us as fools we should give him the boot.
In any negotiation you give and take with your negotiator. You never get ALL of what you want. Israel would do well to consider the land corrider to link Gaza with the West Bank IF she kept some of the West Bank settlements around Jerusalem. Also Israel should take seriously Abbas's plans but also insist in recognition and security and a halt to the threats to destroy her. Its all about Give and take and not being so absolute in your demands (from both sides) that you cannot move. The 2 state solution must be binding under International law and the threats to Israel's existance must stop. I think there is tough barganing but hope a deal can be reached. My worry is the bigots at the UN human rights lobby and the Iranian regime who seem to work to undermine everything postitive, could it be them that scupper a deal one wonders? Lets hope not and peace and normalisation can come. Both sides deserve it.
Abbas has taken his starting point for negotiations out of the haze, and that is buisness-like and promising. So now the really serious give-and-take begins.....
giving away eastern jerusalem is like amputating a part of a jewish body. Jerusalem is the soul of a jewish body. and giving parts of the west bank, only shows how stupid and unpatriotic members of the government runs the country. Israel is a small country, and losing parts of the west bank, Israel loose SECURITY DEPTH, that it is important for defense of the country. Olmert and Haim Ramon they are NOT visionaries, not prophets, and they cannot put at risk the israeli population, for they irresponsable adventures OF GIVING EVERYTHING AND NOT GETTING NOTHING IN RETURN. Giving parts of the west bank or swapping land, IT WILL THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOS ISRAEL (G-D FORBID)
It is impossible to get any consensus on territory for Pal State. It is too late. Arabs lost their opportunity in 1948. Now we have to explain to President Bush that we must work on other concept to accomodate Pal Arabs. Possibly after 20-25 years we will see separate mini-states/ cantons for Pal Arabs or many Arabs will be included in Jordan kingdom or Egypt as a Gaza region/canton, etc. Nobody will move rom Samaria or Judea etc. Forget it!
That might explain why they were not satisfied with the offer of Barak (the refusal!)
You really have to be kidding he wants the West Bank and then some you really think he is a peace partner Olmert and Goverment. http://ralphsrant1.blogspot.com/
Especially demand more than Barak offered (which they refused). It's time they and the rest of the Palestinian apologists understood that if you wage wars and lose, then don't expect to get your losses back. There is already a Palestinian state. It's called Jordan.
"In exchange for the West Bank land, Israel is reportedly considering transferring to the Palestinians a strip of area between the Gaza Strip and West Bank to allow for a connection between them.' Cut Israel in half? How irresponsible can you get!
Gaza-WB. Sheer idiocy of Israelis is beyond comprehension.