Olmert, Gal-On exchange fiery words at Knesset plenum
Debate erupts after PM refused to address MK Yachimovich by name during discussion on welfare minister appointment.
By Zvi ZrahiyaA fiery debate broke out Wednesday at the Knesset plenum between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Meretz faction whip Zahava Gal-On, after the prime minister refused to address MK Shelley Yachimovich (Labor) by name.
Olmert took part in the two-hour discussion on the lack of a welfare minister appointment, a debate which had been rescheduled twice already. Yachimovich, who initiated the discussion, had collected the 40 signatures necessary for the discussion.
Yachimovich has recently joined the anti-corruption campaign spearheaded by Accountant General Yaron Zelekha, who testified before the state comptroller against Olmert over the sale of Bank Leumi.
During his discussion on the lack of a welfare minister, Olmert ignored Yachimovich and avoided using her name. Instead, he referred to her as "the MK in the Finance Committee," and said he was amazed that she had not been updated on the decision made with regard to welfare affairs.
In response to Olmert's exchange with Yachimovich, Gal-On asked the prime minister why he did not mention her name. MK Uri Ariel (National Union) jumped in and asked Olmert, "what, do MKs not have names?"
Olmert told Gal-On in response, "You have a problem with me. You aren't the only MK in the world, nor the most interesting. I wasn't talking to you."
To which Gal-On retorted, "I know you weren't talking to me. How pathetic you are on the podium. Such poverty of spirit."
"I wasn't talking about you, I love to hear you when you aren't shouting. But your voice is drowned out by chants of 'Gal-On.' My shouting is preferable to your policy. Your hubris will be the death of you. was your attitude towards MK Magali Wahaba (Kadima) not arrogant, condescending and contemptuous? If I were you I'd get up on the stand and apologize to MK Wahaba. If I were you I'd sit quietly and not preach against condescension or arrogance," Olmert shot back, addressing the exchange that had transpired earlier between Gal-On and Wahaba.
At the end of the discussion, Yachimovich said that "Olmert's behavior was unrestrained and undignified, particularly his outburst at Gal-On. But this is really the least of the prime minister's problems. What's currently on the agenda is Olmert's involvement in corruption, the result of which is the public's loss of trust in democracy and their leader.
|
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert speaking at the Knesset plenum, in Jerusalem on Wednesday. (Kobi Gideon / BauBau) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
The enormous pressure on Olmert is beginning to show. If he were an honorable man, he would resign for the good of Israel. But, he won't do the honorable thing. He will hold on to power no matter how badly doing so will negatively effect Israel. I wish the Israeli people all of the good luck in the world. They are going to need it.
He couldn't very well have a "bad hair day" since he hardly has any. Nor does he have much in the way of vision, statesmanship or political courage either.
Did PMs such as Shamir and before him much more better?... 2. or earlier wasn't corruption in the same places.., 3. or wasn't acceptable to enjoy advantages and solicit of subordinate women?
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with BS, failing the first two, you can always yell at whoever asked the question.
Gals, guys, stop this quibbling! Olmert just had a bad-hair-day, and should be understood.....
For absolutely the first time in my life, I found myself completely agreeing with Shelley Yachimovich. The days of Moshiach are fast approaching.