Officer: Ground operation only considered in third week of war
Senior IDF officer says Mossad Chief Dagan was only one who made a clear demand on the issue on July 12.
By Amos HarelA senior officer in the Israel Defense Forces General Staff said Tuesday that during last summer's war, the option of a large-scale ground operation in southern Lebanon was not seriously discussed by the General Staff or by the political establishment until July 27, more than two weeks after the war broke out.
The officer made the comments in response to a report published in Haaretz Tuesday regarding the consultations held among the army's top brass during the war.
The senior officer told Haaretz that "the only senior member of the political-security establishment to demand on July 12 to initiate a major ground operation was Mossad Chief Meir Dagan. I was present at all the major discussions - and Dagan was the only one who made a clear demand on the issue."
According to the officer, Deputy Chief of Staff Moshe Kaplinsky and Operations Directorate Head Gadi Eisenkot (who is currently GOC Northern Command) raised the need for the army to prepare for a large-scale ground operation during the discussions held on the day the war broke out, July 12. However, a short time later it became clear that the political leadership and the chief of staff did not consider a ground operation as being a realistic option at that time, and it was removed from the agenda. Only during the war's third week did the army begin to seriously prepare for a large-scale ground operation, which included placing three divisions into action in southern Lebanon.
"Other than Meir Dagan, anyone who claims he presented, beginning on July 13, a demand for a wide-scale ground operation, is simply distorting the facts," said the officer. "Maybe it was gossip whispered in someone's ear in one of the war rooms, or maybe a proposal that was raised in a conversation in the hallway, but it was not a serious option. People are simply trying to improve their public standing now, by making segments of information public."
He confirmed the accuracy of the quotes made during the deliberations, but claims the manner in which they were presented creates a false impression of developments. According to the officer, the segments that were quoted create the impression that a serious ground option existed, supported by several of the generals, at an early stage of the war - much earlier than it really was.
The publication of the quotes Tuesday drew many reactions among field commanders, most of whom were aware of the internal classified deliberations among the IDF top brass during the war. A number of officers told Haaretz that the inquiry committee headed by retired justice Eliyahu Winograd will help clarify the war's events.
"We are gradually discovering that there were a lot of things that happened differently than we thought," the commanders said.
Meanwhile, Peretz has begun holding consultations on the appointment of a new Defense Ministry director general to replace Gabi Ashkenazi, who is expected to take over as chief of staff in about two weeks, at the end of a vetting process.
Among the candidates are reserve major generals Ilan Biran, Amos Malka, and Yedidya Yaari. It is doubtful that Biran, who already served as the Ministry's director general in the second half of the 1990s, will be interested in the position.
|
Mossad chief Meir Dagan. (BauBau Archives) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Mossad chief Meir Dagan triggered the war on behalf of his US peers to destabilizing the region. The Mossad is state within a state within a state. Remembering the abortion of the gold mining deal with North Korea by the Mossad, about ten years ago, against the will of the Israel government. You should dismantle this highly corrupted horror institution for having peace with your neighbours and the world.
Is the IDF a workshop for the mentally handicapped?
with Israel enemies of any kind should be pre-planned. The Iranian proxy HEZBoLLAH should be watched closely on the regular basis, The next HEZBOLLAH provocation hopefully will be met with an Iron Fist and retaliated without hesitation, HEZBOLLAH has to be completely destroyed together with Nasrallah and NASRALLAH's supporters.
The first mistake made in the July 2006 war was hitting the infrastructure and civilian targets in Lebanon. The second mistake is no finishing up Hizb-Iran! To correct the above 2 mistakes, Israel must eliminate Iran's and Syria's regimes support to Hizb-Iran! If you don't do that, you will face a new Hitler (President of Iran) with nuclear weapons who is willing to use it!
Reporting events as more than two weeks after the war 'broke out' suggests that this was in the hands of g-d rather than the hands of man - or perhaps more aptly, like the wife-beater who insists She MADE him Do It.
next war,,,but not fight it on basis of last war..prepare anew for new war...to often generals and politicians fight the current war with principles, plans, actions based/learned from last war...wrong wrong wrong. lets try learning from history ours and the worlds.
Clearly, the inexperience and lack of leadership of Peretz, Olmert and Haluts contributed to the lost time. Sure, mistakes were made but overall by the 3rd week the progress was clear. Hezbollah was routed and their bases, communication bunkers, supplies were destroyed. Hundreds of Hezbollah militants were killed and wounded. The mistake was on Olmert's part for not backing the IDF's continued drive against Hezbollah to Beirut and Bekaa. It was a political blunder and the Israeli civilian and military leadership will hopefully learn from it not to repeat it again.
This disclosure should come as no surprise to anyone who is versed in army tactics. I have already mentioned in these posts,that it would have been no big thing, had the IDF been allowed to fight the Lebanon war on it`s own, and not be shackled by the politicians. You would not now be hearing about Nasrallah and his Hizbullah rag-tag army; they would have been history. The trouble with modern warfare, is that they are constantly being fought by the politicians, and not by the army generals who are trained to fight wars, hence you end up with indecisive battles like, Viet Nam, Suez, Iraq, Lebanon, Gaza etc. No result, inconclusive wars.