• Published 18:44 29.03.10
  • Latest update 00:55 31.03.10

Obama wants sanctions on Iran 'in weeks'

Under Russian pressure, G8 issues watered-down statement on Tehran's enrichment program.

By News Agencies Tags: Iran sanctions Barack Obama Israel news Iran nuclear

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he would like to see new UN sanctions placed on Iran in a matter of weeks as he and French President Nicolas Sarkozy presented a united front on Tehran's nuclear program.

Obama and Sarkozy, at a joint White House news conference, made clear they felt it was time to move ahead with tougher sanctions that their governments have been negotiating with China, Russia, Germany and Britain.

"My hope is that we are going to get this done this spring," Obama said. "I'm interested in seeing that regime in place in weeks."

China, reluctant for months, is believed to be slowly falling in line in backing the idea of new sanctions.

Sarkozy said "the time has come to take decisions" on Iran and that with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, "we will make all necessary efforts to make sure that Europe as a whole engages in the sanctions regime."

The United States and its allies believe Iran is seeking to develop a nuclear weapon, a charge Tehran denies.

Obama said the long-term consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran are unacceptable and that Tehran had so far rejected diplomatic entreaties.

"The door remains open if the Iranians choose to walk through it," he said.

G8 says nuclear Iran 'unacceptable'

Also on Tuesday, the United States failed to win overwhelming support from world economic powers for sanctions to block Tehran's nuclear ambitions as G8 foreign ministers issued an insipid statement on Iran.

In a joint statement issued after the meeting of the leading industrialized nations in Ottawa, Canada, foreign ministers of the Group of Eight countries said that an Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable.

"Ministers agreed to remain open to dialogue and also reaffirmed the need to take appropriate and strong steps to demonstrate international resolve to uphold the international nuclear nonproliferation regime," the communique said.

Russia, which has shown reluctance to back the American push for a fourth round of UN sanctions, reportedly refused to bow to U.S. pressure for a tougher diplomatic stance against Tehran.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, launching the G8 summit Monday, said the world could not accept a nuclear-armed Iran and that China could help resolve the impasse with Tehran.

Ahead of the meeting, Clinton seemed focused not on Russia but China, playing down fears that the eastern power was out of step with the other veto-wielding members of the UN Security Council on Iran.

"China is part of the consultative group that has been unified all along the way, which has made it very clear that a nuclear-armed Iran is not acceptable to the international community," Clinton told CTV in an interview.

Despite the setback over Russian support, Clinton remained upbeat about the prospect of a consensus after the meeting closed.

Sanctions were a part of diplomacy, she said, adding that Iran had repeatedly shown an unwillingness to fulfill its international obligations over the last 15 months.

"That's the basis on which I express my optimism that we're going to have a consensus reached in the Security Council," she told reporters.

The two-day meeting brought together foreign ministers from the Group of Eight industrialized countries, which includes the United States, Canada, Britain, France, Japan, Germany, Italy and Russia.

Opening the conference earlier Tuesday, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Iran must halt its nuclear enrichment activities and comply with international demands to come clean about its atomic program.

On behalf of the ministers, Harper urged the world to adopt a heightened focus on the Iranian nuclear issue and take stronger coordinated action against Iran.

But China, which has close economic links to Iran, has repeatedly said that the world needs more time to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff over the Iranian nuclear program, which Tehran insists is purely for peaceful purposes.

U.S. officials have indicated that while the countries at this week's G8 conference are largely agreed on the likelihood of new sanctions against Iran, the scope and severity of the new measures remained to be worked out.

Those discussions have gathered steam since Tehran rejected an offer of a nuclear fuel swap deal that would have been brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, speaking to reporters in Washington, said the United States was encouraged by some of the signs coming from Beijing.

"On issues of concern to us, we have seen some progress," Steinberg said.

Turkish backing?

Earlier Monday, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said he did not favor imposing economic sanctions to pressure Iran into showing that it has no covert nuclear weapons program.

Erdogan discussed different approaches with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel to international efforts to rein in Iran's nuclear ambitions, but made clear Turkey's reluctance to back the use of sanctions.

"We are of the view that sanctions are not a healthy path and that the best route is diplomacy," he said at a joint news conference with Merkel.

Turkey is a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and Erdogan said it had not yet reached a firm decision on how it would vote on a U.S.-backed sanctions resolution.

Merkel urged NATO ally Ankara to be ready to support the imposition of sanctions through the UN unless Iran shows transparency to assure the international community that it has no ambitions for nuclear weapons.

"We would be happy if Turkey votes in April on the Iran issue together with the United States and the European Union," she said.

Turkey, frustrated by the slow progress of its EU membership negotiations, doubts the effectiveness of sanctions and its trade would inevitably suffer if sanctions were imposed on its fellow Muslim neighbor.

"Turkey shares a 380 km (240 mile) border with Iran and it is an important partner, especially in energy. When appraising our relations we shouldn't ignore this," Erdogan said.

He also raised doubts about the results of three earlier rounds of milder sanctions against Iran.

In an apparently veiled reference to Israel, the Turkish leader referred to another country in the region that possessed nuclear weapons. Israel is widely assumed to have the bomb but has never admitted to possessing nuclear weapons.

"We are against nuclear weapons in our region. But is there another country in our region that has nuclear weapons? Yes, there is. And have they been subjected to sanctions? No," Erdogan said.

Turkey is worried about the potential for a nuclear arms race in the region between Iran and Israel, though it does not feel directly threatened by either country.

"If the world trusts us, we would fine a middle path with Iran. I hope that we will reach a result if we continue to work," Erdogan said.

Despite good relations with Tehran, Erdogan's own attempts to persuade the Iranian leadership to make moves needed to allay international concerns have so far come to naught.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 30. 0 0
    sanctions
    • Rick
    • 01.04.10
    • 08:50

    sanctions don't work. Sadam did not suffer a bit while 200 children a day died from sanctions. They just confirm the governments propaganda that the whole world is against them. Just look at that clown in Zimbabwe and the regime in Myanmar.

  • 29. 0 0
    Israel paranoid
    • Gully Foyle
    • 31.03.10
    • 16:17

    For over five years, Israel has been claiming that Iran has, or is building, nukes without a scintilla of evidence that it's true. Personally, I think Ahmadinejad is jerking Israel's chain and laughing his head off over his stunt.

  • 28. 0 0
    Sanctions? Yeah, good luck with that !
    • Josiah J. Ben David
    • 31.03.10
    • 09:21

    Obama is all hot air, smoke and mirrors. He has all but lost the respect from enemies and allies alike . Perhaps he should stick to playing basketball.

  • 27. 0 0
    Forget Obama! Putin will decide whether Iran goes nuclear
    • Voice of Reason
    • 31.03.10
    • 07:48

    Obama is just posturing for domestic political purposes. Neither Iran nor anyone else (including Israel) is going to compromise on their national interests out of concern for what Obama says or thinks. Now Putin--that is another matter. There is a bit of Cheney style backbone in that boy!

  • 26. 0 0
    More talk and still no sanctions
    • An American
    • 31.03.10
    • 03:58

    I'm not impressed! We've been listening to these threats for years now and it has accomplished nothing. France is calling for more sanctions when they won't even send more troops to Afghanistan. What a joke. The Ayatollahs were probably laughing at this conference.

  • 25. 0 0
    Obama-Sarkozy agree on Israel
    • Gully Foyle
    • 31.03.10
    • 03:36

    France's commitment to Israel's security is well known, Sarkozy said, while adding the settlement activity in an area claimed by the Palestinians "contributes nothing."

  • 24. 0 0
    ASK QUESTION MUSLIM
    • TOBIA
    • 31.03.10
    • 01:10

    Your cousins in the Middle East knew Israel had certain weapons. Yet thery kept attacking Israel. Could it be they knew Israel would never use the bomb and distroy area for generations. Your cousins dont feel that way about the little Hitler in Iran. If Iran gets the bomb watch the arms race in thst area

  • 23. 0 0
    #10 Tony Silver
    • mike
    • 31.03.10
    • 00:17

    Iran has the right ? We are not disputing right or wrong, we are talking life or death in the wrong hands. And for someone like yourself that comes across inteligent , I am surprised that you dont see what would happen if Iran should become a distributor to different Factions. How safe will you be.

  • 22. 0 0
    I agree no nukes in mid east Iran 1st then Israel
    • Abdalla
    • 30.03.10
    • 06:37

    Israels neighbors have the right to say no nukes for anyone

  • 21. 0 0
    #10 - Tony Silver
    • Iranian Nukes
    • 30.03.10
    • 06:21

    Tony, very well said and summarised the genuine world view not the double standard view of EU and israel. As long as israel have nukes to intimidate others, Iran has every right to obtain them so that power equilibrium takes place. Bravo Iran

  • 20. 0 0
    The Iranians have not yet decided to actually make and store them
    • Mark B.
    • 30.03.10
    • 05:59

    It may be the requirement of knowledge and means to produce nuke heads which are multi-placable on big ballistic missiles very fast may be enough. Then they can claim it was only for peacefull use (electricity) and the pressure will grow over Dimona where Israel produces it's own nuke-heads.

  • 19. 0 0
    Hillary, Israel and the Real World
    • Cynic
    • 30.03.10
    • 05:45

    The world Hillary refers to is just the US and Israel, and it's quite facetious to suggest China or any other state is complicit in their agenda. The real world has no interest in the nuclear ambitions of Iran, but only in the Israeli violation of International Law and the Geneva Conventions, with its illegal settlements in occupied territory - perhaps Hillary and the US might have more credibility in the real world, if they address that anomaly first.

  • 18. 0 0
    The real threat
    • Simon_Of_Sydney
    • 30.03.10
    • 05:44

    The no 1 threat to Europe and the ME is not Iran, it is in fact Turkey, the most fanatical Muslim country. What makes it dangerous is the fact that it has a veiled (pun not intended), veneer of modernity, with a Jihadist agenda. Iran on the other hand has a hard core Muslim administration with a civilized and moderate captive majority. The world should keep this in mind when dealing with the dishonest and treacherous Turks.

  • 17. 0 0
    TURKEY'S POSITION IS CORRECT!
    • AMERICAN
    • 30.03.10
    • 05:31

  • 16. 0 0
    IRAN cannot have any power....
    • jc
    • 30.03.10
    • 03:56

    but the USA can arm israel to the teeth....

  • 15. 0 0
    #7, there is a One Cypus solution on the way
    • FT
    • 30.03.10
    • 02:18

    Merkel in Turkey.....she spoke of a time window for Israel and this is what this is all about

  • 14. 0 0
    Get rid of Isreal nukes first and the rest go.
    • Kelly
    • 30.03.10
    • 02:14

    Double standrad of western countries must stop. In one hand they want to disarm Muslim countries while arming Isreal and not questioning their nukes. DOUBLE STANDRAD HAVE TO MUST STOP.

  • 13. 0 0
    The good vs. the bad
    • FT
    • 30.03.10
    • 02:13

    It is all in the book and that he continues it makes Obama such a disappointment. 5 minutes Tiergarten were enough.

  • 12. 0 0
    Iran has the right to have its nukes!
    • Tony Silver
    • 29.03.10
    • 23:26

    Israel has them. Iran wants them. So let them. I am not a support of Iran or Ahmdj, but if we want a nuclear free Middle - East, then Israel?s weapons will have to go.

  • 11. 0 0
    Double Standards!
    • Tony Silver
    • 29.03.10
    • 23:25

    No one is permitted to make nuclear weapons. Not being an NPT member does not mean certain attack. Look at Israel, North Korea, India, and Pakistan; no one attacks their nuke sites. No war is ever justified. People create wars to satisfy their own agenda.

  • 10. 0 0
    provoking iran makes things only worse make 2 state solution
    • muslim--
    • 29.03.10
    • 22:55

    You cant have it both ways... as long as you don't make any solutions at all israel is no better then any pariah and don't point fingers anywhere. Sanctions on iran would be a Joke if israel is not handed the same Treatment for its abuses. And the facts of the matter is iran has a clear issue. israel curse is its inability to face reality and it attempts to instead bend it to its will... most of the time it backfires. You cannot hunt World support while holding palestine as hostage and urging world to attack iran on your behalf which will create a world war 3. Any such move will backfire on israel far beyond any harm to iran.

  • 9. 0 0
    Let's start with sanctions for Turkey's illegal occupation
    • JW
    • 29.03.10
    • 22:50

    Let's start with sanctions for Turkey's illegal occupation of northern Cyprus.

  • 8. 0 0
    Crude Erdogan equating Israel & Iran
    • Joe
    • 29.03.10
    • 21:29

    For the PM of Turkey to equate the danger posed by a terrorist state with explicit plans of genocide & bloody repression within its borders to Israel which is a small democratic state not threatening other peaceful neighbours, is a sure sign where Turkey stands now among nations. It is a not the way Kemal Ataturk would have led his country to cozy with extremist Islamists.

  • 7. 0 0
    Chill-out
    • Hasan
    • 29.03.10
    • 21:18

    Both Iran & Israel need a reality check. They behave like psychiatric patients. We need to free whole ME from nukes. C'mon guys, how do you expect Erdogan to say yes to Merkel when EU tells Turkey to get lost. By the way, please do not call every person "anti-semite" if they do not approve Isreal's policies. GO J-STREET GO. Down w AIPAC

  • 6. 0 0
    What a Wonderful Friend Israel Has in Istanbul!
    • massaraksh
    • 29.03.10
    • 21:18

    More advanced weaponry for Israel's friend?

  • 5. 0 0
    iran never killed us.
    • billy jack
    • 29.03.10
    • 21:08

    with all our incounters with the outside world from theft of our land to killing of the tribes to being locked on reserves,Iran was never part of that contingent.but the people who did kill and steal it are now calling Iran the bad guy,s.when did this happen.The same general outline to describe our resistance is used against the Palestinians,and since Iran is their friend their evil.But Judaic/Christians own our land,yes we know its your world we just live in it.But hey only 14 million aboriginals were killed,aint nothing.

  • 4. 0 0
    Strange AKP administration
    • David Israel
    • 29.03.10
    • 21:06

    We all remember how PM Erdogan was on BBC not long ago saying that Iran has no nuclear ambitions. In fact he was giving personal assurances that he know such ambitions do not exist. Meanwhile president GUL told Claudia Rosett of Forbes (Ex WSJ) "I do believe it is their (IRAN's)final aspiration to have a nuclear weapon in the end," as a matter of " 'national pride.' I wonder which one of them is telling the truth? What kind of a game is AKP playing?

  • 3. 0 0
    Double-headed snake(erdogan)
    • Daniel
    • 29.03.10
    • 19:32

    is showing his poisonous intentions. His newly found, dear friend ah-mad-in-a-jack needs his support developing nuclear weapons..

  • 2. 0 0
    TURKEY= IRAN
    • American
    • 29.03.10
    • 18:56

    Turks are openly supporting the islamic terrorist regime in Iran.Whoever count them as friend of the west and Israel is simply stupid.They are the enemy now.Let's stop them before is too late.

  • 1. 0 0
    Sensible Erdogan
    • Dr. Mamilla-Jerusale
    • 29.03.10
    • 18:52

    Why is it that Erdogan makes so much sense while other politicians just get pressured by Israel? Yes, Israel never signed NPT. Why don't we discuss both Israel and Iran regarding nuclear power and possible weapons. It seems very sensible to me.