Obama: U.S. patience with Iran not unlimited
IAEA chief heading to Iran to discuss inspection of nuke site; Iran, powers to resume talks this month.
By Reuters and Yossi Melman Tags: Iran U.S. Israel news Iran nuclearAfter a day of multilateral talks between world powers and Iran over the latter's contentious nuclear program, U.S. President Barack Obama warned on Thursday that American patience with the Islamic Republic was "not unlimited".
Iran must prove that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes and not geared toward atomic weapons, said Obama, adding that the world powers had sent a "clear and unified message" to that effect.
"The Iranian government heard a clear and unified message from the international community in Geneva. Iran must demonstrate through concrete steps that it will live up to its responsibilities with respect to its nuclear program," he said.
Obama called on Iran to allow access to turn "talk" into action" and open access to its recently disclosed nuclear facility within two weeks. "If Iran follows through with concrete steps, there is a path to a better relationship with the United States and the international community," he said.
"Now that Iran has agreed to open its newly disclosed nuclear enrichment facility to international inspectors, it must grant unfettered access to those inspectors within two weeks," Obama said.
"We expect to see swift action. We're committed to serious ... engagement but we're not interested in talking for the sake of talking," Obama said.
"If Iran does not take steps in the near future to live up to its obligations, then the United States will not continue to negotiate indefinitely and we are prepared to move toward increased pressure," he said. "This is a constructive beginning but hard work lies ahead."
IAEA chief to visit Iran this weekend
The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, is expected to go to Iran this weekend to "work out the details" for inspection of the Islamic Republic's second nuclear facility, a senior U.S. official said on Thursday.
Earlier Iran agreed at talks with the six world powers to open its recently disclosed second enrichment site at Qom to supervision by the International Atomic Energy Agency in the next few weeks, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana and U.S. officials said.
"I understand that Mohamed ElBaradei will be in Tehran this weekend to work out the details," the senior official told reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Iran and the powers have agreed to hold another round of talks on the Islamic Republic's contentious nuclear program before the end of October, Iranian state television reported on Thursday.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called the six-power talks with Iran held in Geneva on nuclear issues a productive session that has opened the door to a positive outcome.
Speaking to reporters at the State Department shortly after the Iran talks ended, Clinton cautioned that it was too soon to know whether Iran would respond with the concrete actions that she said the United States is anticipating.
U.S. Undersecretary of State William Burns and Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed held a "significant conversation" on Thursday, an official attending Iran's talks with six world powers said.
The bilateral meeting, on the sidelines of talks to discuss Iran's nuclear program, is the most high-level U.S.-Iranian contact in three decades, since Washington severed relations with Tehran during a hostage crisis in the wake of Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Jalili, who is heading Iran's delegation to the multiparty nuclear, in Geneva expressed Thursday a willingness to discuss his government's nuclear program on condition that the overall issue of global nuclear proliferation be on the agenda, western sources said.
Jalili gave a "detailed explanation" of wide-ranging proposals Iran submitted to six world powers last month and "emphasised the necessity of complete global [nuclear] disarmament," state broadcaster IRIB reported.
Iran's proposed package touches on various international security and economic issues, but does not mention its own nuclear activities.
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said on Thursday Iran has declared all its atomic sites to the UN nuclear watchdog, countering suspicions that it may have undeclared facilities.
"Whatever Iran has as nuclear sites has been announced to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and the only case that is under construction is Qom and we also announced that," Mottaki said through an interpreter.
EU: Iran nuclear program top priority
Earlier on Thursday, a spokeswoman for European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana said talks between Iran and six world powers are proceeding in a "cordial and businesslike" atmosphere with the main focus on Iran's nuclear program.
"There is a good will of the international community to have a serious relationship with Iran," Cristina Gallach told reporters. "At the same time there are important clarifications to be obtained."
She said Iran's nuclear program was the most important aspect of the talks, which are being hosted by Switzerland at a villa in the Geneva countryside.
Iran's nuclear negotiator touched on the country's nuclear program in his opening statement at talks with six world powers in Geneva, a Western diplomat close to the meeting said Thursday.
He said that Jalili mentioned Tehran's disputed nuclear program "in a general way" in his opening statement, even though Jalili and other Iranian officials had said they would not be willing to discuss Tehran's "nuclear rights" at the one-day talks in Geneva.
"The EU3 (Britain, France and Germany) restated that the July 2008 offer is still on the table," the diplomat, who was present at the talks, said on condition of anonymity.
American sources said Wednesday that the talks will fail if Iran maintains its refusal for meaningful dialogue of the nuclear issue. While some officials have said they are coming to the table with a "positive attitude," others have expressed an unwillingness to discuss the nuclear program.
Talks have been held between Iran and the United States in the past on a variety of issues, including Afghanistan and Iraq, but this is the first time in many years delegates of the two countries will sit at a table to discuss shared concerns, leading with the question of Iranian nuclear capability.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Most of the world feel safe from any bomb from Iran. Israel is the only one fretting and getting support from the US,et al. But Israel willing to give up ANYTHING for peace?
Hal, it's not Alfred rather you (and moron like you) are stupid. Ever did you thought how people across the world thinks about people like you, your comments implies that the frog in the pond slandering the dolphin in the sea. Come on! Do you know why Hamas and HIzbullah exist? It's because people like you, russians and east european economic but migrant jews making native Palestinians homeless through settlement enterprise and racist, apartheid policies.
Mohamed El Baradei of the IAEA has done very little to stop or halt Iran's strategic nuclear weapons program. This entire discussion smells like Neville Chamberlain's polic of appeasement. If someone walks out with a peace of paper and says "Peace in our time..." then I will know the world is in trouble. Use existing UN Security Council resolutions to blockade Iran now. Right now. Keep Israel out of this one. Israel may have nukes but they are not a member of the NPT and they don't go around making threats.
but do U hear a boom a coming... Straighten up, walk right, Iran.....
Alfred, it's not if you would be an idiot, you are an idiot. It is not Israel that crosses borders to kidnap soldiers, it is Irans bully boys Hesballa and Hamas. Like most of you syncofant morons that load up on Israel, you are mostly wrong and ignorant. Israel is not above reproach, but puleeez. The people you defend are criminal to their own people. Iran rapes and tortures it's own citizens for expressing an opinion. Hezballa holds it's country hostage to it's criminal acts. Idiot!
Nobody is buying the Bibi/Libi line. Sorry folks, World War III just to please the Likud is going to be a hard sell! Iran is no threat to anybody or anything, except Israel's Settlements Enterprise, which Iran rightly opposes. So does the whole world except the famous Middle Eastern dog whith the star spangled red white and blue tail.
Obama's goal is quite obvious: Let Iran keep talking until they have detonated their first device. He can then feign ignorance and "disbelief" and claim that since Iran already has a nuke, we must simply move on to the next country that may be seeking the same. Does the name "Chamberlain" ring a bell?
#1 siad what does the quran say about lying and liers, first your supreme leader said QUOTE we dont need nuclear weapons, its against our re-cult-gion to pocess nuclear weapons. Cowardess, antagonistic, subhuman creatures. You say one thing and do another, please elaborate on what iran would do if it had nuclear weapons???
The US and the West should not base their foreign policy on Israeli rantings. If I were Iran or Iranian, and I am neither of them, and have a country like Israel, continuously threatening, continuously attacking it's neihbors, terrorizing defenseless people, and god knows what else, and spew crazy propaganda, which only an idiot would beleive, ofcourse I would arm myself the best way I can. And if I did not, I would be an idiot.
what a dissapointment she is..."Hillary Rodham Clinton called the six-power talks with Iran held in Geneva on nuclear issues a productive session that has opened the door to a positive outcome". Is she for real? come on.....what a joke...why can't they just come out and say it, we know their stalling, we know they want weapons, and unless they halt any and all enrichment, we will bomb it all to smithereens and within one month. Seems like the US has gone from superpower to superpussy.
'Finally, the world may have to live with a nuclear Iran.' Your wordsi. You may be just an optimist. Why are you sure that deing as consequence of Iran going nuclear is not a possibility?
It's so cynical, shameful, and no matter how unpallatable it is to compare, it reminds of Chamberlain.
Despite all the reports.... The key topic for the USA is Afghanistan. Israel is secondary. Iran holds the key cards in Afghanistan and Iraq, and they know it. We have finally officially recognized the radicals in Iran for their resilience. When everything else fails its time to talk.....
International affairs and soveriegn governemnts always present a challenge for diplomats. Since WWII, atomic bomb, and the creation of the United Nations, there's been attempts to resolve everything peacefully and diplomatically. Talking is always good. Remember these are the first talks since 1979 between the USA and Iran. Military options are on the table; but in this case they are not easy to accomplish option. USA knew of the second enrichment facility for years; and western countries still have a lot of influence to bring about something peaceful in these Iranian talks. Finally, the world may have to live with a nuclear Iran.
Go Bibi, GO! We are alone, what kind of deal can we we expect from Obama and the EU?
So we get more blabla.Nothing will change except that Iran gets more time to finish the job..Is that coming clean mr.President Obama?Or will there be a new hidden site come to the table in Geneva?
How long will it take for US and EU to get it ? Iran is playing a game,
Next meeting is in one month, then two more month will be given as a 'Last chance',then... In mean time Iran goes as fast as it can to building a bomb. Obama waisted one year, happy anniversary!
....the end of the world. well done! No one should possess nukes, end of!!
Watching "world leaders" play Charlie Brown to Iran's Lucy (with that pesky nuclear football) teaches us the perils of relying upon "leaders" in the first place. They may have climbed to the top of the political greasy pole but they are still buffoons. At this rate, Iran will turn out to be the only (surprise!) nation possessing nukes and talks will then continue as to whether the United States and Europe will be one province ruled from Tehran or two.
About global climatic change.Not more. Iran need the nukes to be strongest country in middleast,and one of the most strong countries in the world.Iran with nukes is invencible,because they can proliferate,rearm other countries......they can confront any enemy with nukes and long range missiles.