• Published 06:00 28.01.10
  • Latest update 12:13 28.01.10

Obama: Iran will pay a price for stalling nuclear talks

Time Magazine quotes U.S. officials saying new Tehran sanctions are being finalized ahead of UNSC debate.

By Haaretz Service and DPA Tags: Barack Obama Iran nuclear Israel news

Iran will suffer consequences as a result of its refusal to cooperate with the international community on its nuclear program, U.S. President Barack Obama said during his first State of the Union address late Wednesday night in Washington.

The U.S. president's comments came as Time Magazine reported late Wednesday night that the Obama administration was preparing to circulate new sanctions against Tehran.

In his speech, Obama warned that Iranian leaders will face "consequences" if Tehran does not come clean about its nuclear goals, which the West suspects are meant to produce a weapon. Iran claims its program is limited to civilian energy uses.

"As Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: they, too, will face growing consequences," Obama said.

Iran has rebuffed diplomatic overtures by Obama's administration to engage in direct dialogue to resolve the crisis. Obama has said that the United States and its partners will push for additional sanctions if Iran continues to stonewall the international community.

Also Wednesday, U.S. officials reportedly told Time Magazine that the U.S. was preparing "tough" new sanctions against Iran. According to those officials, the new measures, targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as well as financial institutions, are being finalized before being presented for debate in the United Nations Security Council.

The officials, who spoke with Time on condition of anonymity, would not say when a vote might take place, but said negotiations on a proposed fourth round of U.S. Security Council sanctions could begin within weeks.

Earlier Wednesday, German engineering conglomerate Siemens announced that it would cut all future trade ties with Iran, although the company said it intended to maintain existing contracts.

Germany, one of six countries seeking to persuade Iran to suspend its atomic work, is one of the biggest exporters to Iran despite three rounds of modest United Nations sanctions prompted by past Iranian evasions of nuclear monitoring.

Siemens trade with Iran has come under fire from Israel, despite the fact that Israeli government companies continue to provide contracts for airports and paving roads to the German company.

The company has also been under pressure from Jewish and other organizations, including a German group called group Stop the Bomb, which is working to stop Iran's nuclear program.

U.S. President Barack Obama delivering the State of the Union address.

Photo by: (Reuters)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 50. 0 0
    Obama & others need to stop the bullying Iran
    • Dutch
    • 01.02.10
    • 09:48

    Obama and EU leaders keep bullying Iran to com- ply with their standards and when it says "no" they apply more sanctions and double standards. How stupid it is to always reach for the same thing when they know it is not working and wont work either. In addition , they are escalating this sitution instead of calming it down and showing progress towards an agreement. Iran has rights and concerns and Obama & others need to recognize and respect them and let this guide the way forward and stop the bullying. Dutch

  • 49. 0 0
    Obama: Iran to pay a price
    • Jerry Ram
    • 31.01.10
    • 18:47

    You have it all wrong, it is Israel and the world that will pay the price over Iran,s failure to heed the world,s message. And, while the UN. procrastinates, Israel will have to take out Iran by itself. Then the uproar in the UN. and around the world will be deafening . Yes , then all of Israel,s so-called friends, will come to her support. And if you believe that , then you must believe that hyenas are vegetarians.

  • 48. 0 0
    Iran's a mess! No need to make peace w/ Iran her people will kill
    • Petra
    • 30.01.10
    • 11:44

    her 'leaders' if they can. If not, someone else will. Iran has over 1 million heroin addicts, her latest 'response' drill to an attack, left Iran facing the fact that they are not prepared. Iran talks a good talk. Finances terror but, can she defend herself? I don't think so. We may find out soon.

  • 47. 0 0
    Obama, the new Chamberlein
    • Jose Pedro
    • 29.01.10
    • 19:16

    England was hardly bombed by its errors, US is on the same way.

  • 46. 0 0
    what are we waiting for?
    • implant guy
    • 29.01.10
    • 12:13

    What consequences? Will Obama make another speech?

  • 45. 0 0
    Obama will do nothing to Iran
    • GA
    • 29.01.10
    • 11:03

    He is not comfortable with the Afghan and Irak wars and he certainly couldn't cope with anymore, nor does he have the will. He could , if he really wanted to, try to pull together a coalition between Europe, Israel ,USA, Saudia, Egypt, UAR+Kuwait,Bahrain, (all would love to see Iran stopped), but he's not the man to do it. In that case, he should just pull out altogether within weeks not months, from Afghanistan and Irak and Pakistan and let them sort themselves out : perhaps then he will achieve his goal of respecting the Moslem countries and perhaps then those countries will stop blaming USA, they might even come forward and plead for help as Kuwait did to get rid of Saddam with the blessing of Saudia and others.

  • 44. 0 0
    OOh, I'm so scared. Obama should have taken them on at the start.
    • Petra
    • 29.01.10
    • 10:54

    This guy, although President, has become a joke. ( a shame to Americans instead of a source of pride) Obama, as fierce as a new born kitty cat. If Obama ever reflects on his errors, one of the biggest will be his stance of demanding Israel 'freeze' settlements and criticizing Israel while bowing to the Saudis whose oil $$ finances this terror and takes our money at the pump. The joke will be on them both when we successfully use alternative fuels and re elect an American as President who trusts both US and our best ally, Israel, equally. Is there anything worse than an unfaithful ally? Obama, the ridesalmost up. I doubt he can be re elected, and that's good.

  • 43. 0 0
    to ahmir khan
    • neil
    • 29.01.10
    • 04:14

    is your question genuine or whining, ahmir? the answer is rather obvious don't you think? ponder and you'll see the light

  • 42. 0 0
    #39 - Persian Kitty
    • Maurice Savaryego
    • 28.01.10
    • 22:57

    I found the carictaure exquisite! I wish all the best for the great country of Iran. I am sure we will soon see its liberation from the fascists criminals and dictators who have kidnapped the country. By the way what does the sentence "Shohrabim, Nedayim, Ma hameh yek sedayim" mean?

  • 41. 0 0
    Obama and Iran
    • PavlT
    • 28.01.10
    • 20:00

    Anyone listening to the President last night, was treated to another dazzling performance of pathological narcissism - man, can that boy talk! As the world burns, he fiddles to the teleprompter, characteristically bowing to evil and revealing the substance of his "Peace Prize" - good oratory. Taking full credit for "undeniable progress", perpetual deferrence to responsibility and characteristic, political, double-speak all substatiates his delusion. His "new sanctions" are surely to be another non-starter - I'm sure our little friend in Teheran is giddy with aprehension. Still, I continue to pray for peace, while our inspired leaders are clearly distracted in the bright lights of self-promotion. Ultimately, G_d gets the last word. Shalom.

  • 40. 0 0
    Amazing- So Now Obama's The Problem
    • Bill
    • 28.01.10
    • 19:19

    Blaming Obama for the lack of peace in the ME ignores the 61 years of history which preceded his term in office. The problem existed before he took office and will likely be a problem after he's gone. Iran will not use nukes in a preemptive attack Israel because to do so will guarantee Iran's demise. However, if Israel truly believes Iran is a threat to her existence, then by all means she should attack those Iranian nuclear facillities and destroy them...just be prepared to fly solo. The argument that a nuke-equipped Iran is certain to use them against Israel is also baseless. I heard Nikita Khrushchev direct the same kinds of threats toward the US during the Cold War. Khrushchev never launched then for exactly the same reason that the mullahs won't do so now.

  • 39. 0 0
    Ali from Tehran
    • Persian Kitty
    • 28.01.10
    • 18:39

    We'll see where you stand in 2 weeks....we are here.....we are countless....we are GREEN. And we'll get you. Here's a pic of what your life would look like on Bahman 23rd (Feb 12th): http://www.iranian.com/main/2010/jan/23-bahman Shohrabim, Nedayim, Ma hameh yek sedayim.....

  • 38. 0 0
  • 37. 0 0
    Everybody knows that bombs are not required: yawn
    • ankhfnkhonsu
    • 28.01.10
    • 16:52

    The mullahs are hanging on by an iron thread with very big rust spots. A little more push and the Revolutionary Guards and the mullahs are going to meet the same fate as the Shah's goons. Sanctions ARE going to make the difference--ll the Iranian dissidents agree. The big players with Iran are being isolated--China and Russia. But the others are sensitive: Siemens just dropped out. The socialist hypocrites, the Norwegian Government's Norsk Hydro and sovereign wealth funds are next. No to Jarlsberg cheese and smoked salmon

  • 36. 0 0
    obama is all talk, no action
    • superjew
    • 28.01.10
    • 16:32

    Sept 20 was supposed to be a deadline...you know, the conference in Pittsburgh where obama pissed off Sarkozy...The next deadline was year end. Well, that came and went too. The UN was supposed to be about no enrichment, and everyone kinda seems to forget about that.Now it's about uranium swaps! obama sold out the Czechs and Poles on missile defense and got NOTHING from Russia...great RESET BUTTON obie... He got nothing from China. He bowed to Saudi king and got NOTHING! Trying to enact sanctions that don?t hurt the people but only the mullahs and guard is a total sham. If he were serious, there would have already been a naval blockade, but noooooo, everything this president does is for PR, not for substance. His whole outreach to iran has PROVEN to be completely naive. By the way, moussavi, the moderate, is in favour of nuclear weapons. Curiously, the leader of the FREE world is nowhere in sight. he is a creampuff and everyone knows it.

  • 35. 0 0
    times are changing
    • Ali
    • 28.01.10
    • 16:19

    times are changing , we are not afraid of Obama with his 'change' talks. i thought that USA + Israel would bomb us in 2007 already ? , but now its 2010 and the Islamic Republic of Iran is getting stronger everyday. we have nothing to lose , this is what we live for .

  • 34. 0 0
    SANCTIONS DON'T WORK
    • X-MILITARY
    • 28.01.10
    • 15:05

    Cuba has been under American sanctions for about 50 years and is doing quite nicely. This American President is running around in circles chasing his own tail, he may catch it and there is where the problem starts. Without world co-operation sanctions are useless and benefit China without any damage to Iran.Only way to stop Iran from obtaining nukes is military. Now the USA has in its arsenall conventional weapons that can wipe Irans nuclear facilities and everything within 5 miles of them of the face of the earth.This will start World War 3. Israel will have to bomb the facilities, Iran retalietes against Israel and American bases in Middle East and USA has right to attack Iran. If Iran justafibly retaliets against Israel only, USA can't interfeer, Israel demolished by IRANIAN, HEZBOLIAH, and HAMAS missiles. Interesting to see how this plays out. Nobody wants World War 3 (ARMAGEDEN)

  • 33. 0 0
    S
    • flora
    • 28.01.10
    • 14:41

    the way i see it the democrat is trying to correct the destruction left it by Bush and his republican empty head

  • 32. 0 0
    iran will pay a price for stalling nuclear talks
    • m walter
    • 28.01.10
    • 14:38

    Obama does not have the guts to stop nethanayu from increasing more settlements., His mouth is pretty big for Iran. He is already going down hill as the worse president, with all his talk " we will, yes we can, we must" what garbage. He is afraid of Nethany as he has him around the waist. Keep up the good works, I see another war coming.

  • 31. 0 0
    Mark of Lewiston Well said :)
    • Obamamamma
    • 28.01.10
    • 14:32

  • 30. 0 0
    Obama international theater
    • china_future
    • 28.01.10
    • 14:06

    All this sabre rattling from Obama and Bibi against Iran is just badly written and acted theater. In the end, Iran will do as it pleases because no one, besides Israel, wants a war. Sanctions will not work, especially since Russia, China and a whole bunch of other countries will just ignore them. Iran will get nuclear weapons if they choose to and Israel will just have to swallow their pride and shut up about any more war. The US has neither the will nor the ability to go to war with Iran. To do so would kill the US economy so bad it might never recover - that would create a lot of starving angry people - with much of the anger focused on Israel!

  • 29. 0 0
    To Mark Lincoln
    • Bill from Boston
    • 28.01.10
    • 13:55

    Perhaps Obama simply recognized that Netanyahu was unwilling to pursue peace, and walked away to focus on more pressing problems. I know I would have. As for Afghanistan, the US has always tried to live up to the motto You Break It, You Fix It. You would have to admit, neither Iraq nor Afghanistan are anywhere close to being fixed. Not fighting republicans? Have you heard of the health care bill? And which statements did he not pursue? Mid East Peace? Go back and reread my first sentence. However I do think your statement about Iran is correct and one out of five ain’t bad. You could make the big leagues with a batting average like that.

  • 28. 0 0
    How Ironic John the American
    • Peter Williams
    • 28.01.10
    • 13:40

    JTA:"As far as giving a nuke to terrorists they have never given chemical or biological weapons so why on earth would you think they would give a nuke?" There are many reports that Iran has already given Hezbollah chemical weapons. eg: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1112168.html So let's rephrase that question of yours. If Iran has already given chemical weapons to their proxies then why do you think they wouldn't give a nuke?

  • 27. 0 0
    Russia and China
    • Sam
    • 28.01.10
    • 13:26

    stand behind Iran. Nobody want really to be in trouble with them.

  • 26. 0 0
    i agreem with mark l! lets send in Peter SM and friends!!
    • and we can watch
    • 28.01.10
    • 13:10

    go get those iran ians peter!! show them!! sides it will do you good to get out...you spend your whole life here, so widen your horizons!!! go peter go!!! my hero

  • 25. 0 0
    Mark of Lewiston
    • Peter Williams
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:48

    What`s Australia Doing About Iran? You might remember that Australian troops have supported the US in Korea, Vietnam, both Iraq wars and Afghanistan to name a few. Should the US president decide to take on Iran, I have no doubt we would be there to.

  • 24. 0 0
    and you are lying, iran is not israels threat
    • a jew
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:36

    this is pure lie, just like it was iraq and afghanistan

  • 23. 0 0
    The IDF wants you!
    • American Citizen
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:18

    So many warmongering cowards in this discussion from the 101st chicken hawk keyboard brigade. Why don't you enlist instead of begging President Obama fight your enemies? Either enlist in the military or just shut up, cowards.

  • 22. 0 0
    Obama's naivety will cost many lives in the ME.
    • Jerusalem Jew
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:08

    The ME doesn't have time for Obama's naive try-out games, whereby he keeps on changing tactics, whenever a tactic doesn't do the job. Obama's ineptitude will soon be translated into Iran passing the nuclear threshold, introducing a new and chilling era in the ME, whereby Iran will be able to blackmail the West into acceding to all of Iran's demonic and irrational demands. What will Obama say when Iran will make use of its nuclear warheads via its proxies like Syria, hams and hizbollah? "Oops, I made a boo-boo? Sorry, Israel and Egypt, I was certain I was doing the right thing. Well, too bad. Let's go and ruin other peoples'lives."

  • 21. 0 0
    Peter SM - Who cares what Oz thinks
    • American Citizen
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:07

    Australians are as dumb as Texans. Murdoch dumbed down Ozzies to the point, they're attacking Indians thinking their Arabs. And you shouldn't worry about Iran, China is eyeing your resources. Go put that shrimp on the barbie!

  • 20. 0 0
    M Of Lewiston Our soldiers fight shoulder to shoulder with the US
    • PETER SM
    • 28.01.10
    • 12:01

    They fight they die their families get abusive letters from a local Sheikh. Dont underestimate us mate. In Viet Nam our soldiers called down artilery strikes on themselves when sorrounded by Viet Cong and fought their way out. In Timor they took on the embedded Indonesian special forces.The Indonesians high tailed it home. In Iraq the Persians tried to get Australians to surrender at gun point in a boat,twice, in Iraqi waters.The Australians,unlike others, assumed battle positions and told the Iranians to Farsi off-they did. Our education institutions bring in billions of dollars. Yes and many of our surfers are world champions as well Don't understimate us mate.Its been tried before.

  • 19. 0 0
    #8 look it up
    • John the American
    • 28.01.10
    • 11:39

    Iran can easily drop out of the NNPT and will then be in the same position as Israel. As far as giving a nuke to terrorists they have never given chemical or biological weapons so why on earth would you think they would give a nuke?

  • 18. 0 0
    Peter SM - What's Australia Doing About Iran?
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 28.01.10
    • 11:38

    You're so hot for the US to do something. What's your country going to do? How many hundred thousand surfers are you guys committing?

  • 17. 0 0
    S - Republicans Now in Majority in Senate
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 28.01.10
    • 10:58

    The new majority in the US Senate is 41 votes out of 100. Republicans got that earlier this week. It's not enough to stop a Democratic Party filibuster. But Republicans now control the agenda through their ability to filibuster everything. Almost nothing passes the Senate except pay raises. They even held up troop funding for almost a month.

  • 16. 0 0
    "AMERICAN " citizen.You do not care about US oil supplies do you?
    • PETER SM
    • 28.01.10
    • 10:53

    Nuclear armed imperialist Iran will be in a position to threaten them.The Saudis know it and are working actively to prevent it.Remember how the Islamic games were cancelled over the"PERSIAN" gulf issue. Iran has already invaded an Iraqi oil field.What do you think will happen when they have nuclear tipped missiles capable of threatennning the whole M.E. and further. What hegemony? The Islamic bomb exists and Pakistan have gone to war against Israel in the past for the Arabs. Never mind keep blame shifting it sure is a good way to hide the truth.

  • 15. 0 0
    2 Mark from Nowhere - Bite Me
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 28.01.10
    • 10:30

    He's the President of the United States. You don't like him? So What? We elected him to be OUR President.

  • 14. 0 0
    4~MarkL:""Also why is Israel allowed to have nuclear technology"
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 28.01.10
    • 10:20

    If Israel have 'nuclear technology'; because Israel is the only country in the world that was threaten to be removed from the map ! Wouldn't you try to do the same yourself 'MarkL' ?! I mean try to develop 'nuclear technology' to protect yourself if you can afford it ?!

  • 13. 0 0
    not while russia and china still have a vote
    • so get over it
    • 28.01.10
    • 10:11

  • 12. 0 0
    So.....
    • American Citizen
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:46

    Maybe Obama will press for more sanctions (which only helps Russian and Chinese businesess) but we are definitely not going to war with Iran to guarantee Israel's regional nuclear hegemony.

  • 11. 0 0
    Good luck Obama !
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:46

    This is how the leader of the free world must talk! "Obama: Iran will pay for stalling nuclear talks". Without Democracy there will never be a 'free world". Many countries mainly arab countries are living above the law.They are mistreating both their own people and the world. They are a menace to human's civilization. The free world must defend itself against such kind of countries or the world as we know it will perish from the earth. Iraq & Afghanistan are not the only ones. Terror is mushrooming every where. It is taking all shapes & forms to influence the world. Using religion is their first weapon mainly against the Jews. Isn't that how the Nazi started their filthy scheme? Aren't we witnessing the same in today's Iran !? Without the U.S might, the world is doomed. Appeasement is NOT the language of true leaders. Hitting where it hurts is what leaders are supposed to do. "Iran will pay for stalling nuclear talks" is a statement from a born leadership! Good luck Obama!

  • 10. 0 0
    Obama and the Democrats may leave a destructive trail behind ...
    • S
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:43

    ... them if the Republicans do not stop them. This is a matter of survival!

  • 9. 0 0
    IRAN will pay NOTHING.China was offered cheaper oil by Saudis
    • PETER SM
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:39

    in return for buying from them and compliance with boycott-they refused. Repayment may yet come to the Chinese via Uighurs or Russia via Chechens supported by a Iran armed with nukes and long range missiles whose economy they helped keep afloat to support mischief in the M.E. and elsewhere.

  • 8. 0 0
    Re Ahmir Khann
    • Look it UP
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:26

    when you sign the NPT which allows other countries to help you obtain nuclear technology, you agree to only use that technology for peacefull purposes, and have the world monitor you to make sure you dont weaponize it. Israel did not need to sign the NPT to obtain this technology. Therefore it does not have to abide by those rules. Furthermore israel will never use nuclear weapons unless its its last option. Iran will sell/give these weapons to terrorists.

  • 7. 0 0
    Obama knows Iran will go nuclear ,his rhetoric is only for......
    • arash
    • 28.01.10
    • 09:14

    external consumption ,with bombs going off in baghdad and uncertainty in afghanistan and failed nuclear state in pakistan ,emerging china ,reluctant japan al qaeda cells everywhere ,broken economy ,emerging opposition in iran and on on on...............i don't think he is ready to pick a fight with fanatic regime in Iran....Oh did i mention n korea?!

  • 6. 0 0
    The gracious president.
    • Stephen
    • 28.01.10
    • 08:47

    Charming fellow. Probably a great lawyer as well. He could well lull any suspicious jury, in acquitting a serial killer. Great orator. Well, now he has to prosecute. Thats not going to happen. For Iran's regime happens to have a jury that will revolt. Good day.

  • 5. 0 0
    The West certainly Israel will likely pay more
    • DT
    • 28.01.10
    • 08:26

    The only thing more useless than sanctions is doing nothing, but not by much, and they will have not the slightest effect on Iran

  • 4. 0 0
    #1MarkL
    • Ahmir Khann
    • 28.01.10
    • 07:22

    Why doesn't isreal comply with the NPT also? Also why is israel allowed to have nuclear technology AND weapons?

  • 3. 0 0
    #1, MarkL, "essential to return Iran to total compliance"
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 28.01.10
    • 06:45

    mark, you are a dreamer. there is no power on earth that can force iran to fully comply with its obligation under the ntp and its additional protocols.

  • 2. 0 0
    Yeah..when hell freezes over!
    • Mark
    • 28.01.10
    • 06:33

    the problem with this guy is that he's a phony...he doesn't belong where he is-he's over his head and anybody who thinks that he means what he says about Iran should re-examine their thought processes. Go back and look at what he's done and said-nothing with the "panty" bomber, and .."americans distrust moslems because of the way they pray?" He's gone around apologizing for US policy and has made all manner of overtures to Iran..without any response. Only Israel gets the full brunt of his effort-to surrender more land and security for nothing.

  • 1. 0 0
    A man who has never delivered
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 28.01.10
    • 06:19

    Obama chickened out on Mideast Peace the first time he met Netanyahu. He submitted to taking on Bush's Afghanistan bungle as his own. He refused to fight the republicans out to destroy him. He should not make statements he is unwilling to pursue. I think it is essential to return Iran to total compliance with the NPT and it's additional protocols. But does Obama know what he must have to do the job? A spine, and there is no evidence that he has one.