• Published 17:50 24.10.09
  • Latest update 23:05 24.10.09

Obama calls Medvedev, Sarkozy to consult on Iran

U.S., Russia and France affirm support for nuke deal; UN inspectors head to Iran to visit nuclear site.

By Reuters and Haaretz Service Tags: UN IAEA Iran nuclear Israel news

U.S. President Barack Obama called Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and French President Nicolas Sarkozy on Saturday to consult on Iran's nuclear program, the White House said.

In their call, Obama thanked Sarkozy for France's close cooperation during the negotiations in Vienna toward an agreement responding to Iran's request for fuel for a Tehran research reactor, and both presidents affirmed their full support for the proposal put forth by the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the White House said.

In his call to Medvedev, Obama thanked him for Russia's leadership in developing the proposal and both Medvedev and Obama affirmed their full support for the proposal and discussed the importance of all parties accepting it so implementation can begin as soon as possible, the White House said.

In the framework of the so-called P5+1 talks on Iran, both Obama and Medvedev underscored the need to maintain Russian and U.S. unity in pursuing the two nations' mutual concerns about Iran nuclear program.

The United States, Russia, France, Britain, China and Germany have been holding talks with Iran about its nuclear program which Western countries fear could be aimed at building a nuclear bomb. Tehran says its program is peaceful.

Tehran has said it will respond next week to the IAEA proposal under which it would send the bulk of its stock of low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for further processing into fuel for the Tehran reactor.

Obama and Medvedev also discussed other issues, including continued work to finish a new START treaty by the end of 2009. The current Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty expires on Dec. 5.

In his call to Sarkozy, the two presidents expressed U.S.-French unity on Iran and agreed to continue their close consultations in the weeks ahead, the White House said.

Meanwhile, a team of UN inspectors went to Iran on Saturday to visit a recently revealed nuclear site, amid new efforts to curb Iran's nuclear program.

The International Atomic Energy Agency experts are slated to examine an unfinished uranium enrichment facility near the holy city of Qom to verify it is for peaceful purposes. Disclosure of its existence last month raised international suspicion over the extent and aim of the country's nuclear program.

Iran official: West trying to cheat us with nuke deal

MIran's parliament speaker, Ali Larijani, said on Saturday that Western powers are trying to "cheat" Iran through the draft deal.

"They insist on going in a direction that speaks of cheating. They are imposing some things on Iran," Larijani told the student news agency ISNA, echoing some officials who suggested on Friday that instead of accepting the draft, Iran should buy nuclear fuel from abroad.

"I see no links between providing the fuel for the Tehran reactor and sending Iran's low enriched uranium abroad."

Other influential Iranian officials on Saturday also criticized the United Nations-drafted agreement, ISNA reported.

"Iran needs its 3.5 percent enriched uranium for use in our power stations. Consequently it is in Iran's interest to buy nuclear fuel," said Alaeddin Boroujerdi, head of parliament's National Security and Foreign Affairs committee, quoted by ISNA.

Iran, which says its nuclear energy program is only for producing electricity, is years away from having any nuclear power plants that would use low enriched uranium.

The agreement requires Iran to send 1.2 tons of its known 1.5-tonne stockpile of low-enriched uranium to Russia and France by the end of the year, Western diplomats say.

There it would be further processed, in a way that would make it hard to use for warheads, and returned to Iran as fuel plates to power a Tehran reactor that makes radioactive medical isotopes but is due to run out of its imported fuel in a year.

Another leading lawmaker said any nuclear deal with world powers should be accompanied by the scrapping of UN Security Council sanctions against Iran.

"Any nuclear fuel deal with the West...should come with relinquishment of sanctions on Iran, particularly a lifting of sanctions on raw uranium imports," said lawmaker Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, the semi-official ILNA news agency reported.

Buying enriched uranium abroad would not only fail to reduce the domestic stockpile worrying the international community, but also require sanctions imposed on Iran since 2006 to be waived to allow it to import such sensitive nuclear material.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last say on all state matters, including nuclear issue, has so far remained silent over the deal.

Iran's IAEA representative said a team of U.N. nuclear monitors was scheduled to visit Iran's newly disclosed second uranium enrichment plant on Sunday, state television reported.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 19. 0 0
    intresse
    • per larsson
    • 25.10.09
    • 04:42

    So nice of you in the east, that you are not ego, and you to go for the west!!!! :-D

  • 18. 0 0
    Reality must be seen from many positions
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 25.10.09
    • 03:31

    Anyone who has been reading the Iranian press has a quite different understanding of the situation from those reading only the Israeli press. I consider the Iranian press more deluded, though neither not deluded. Iran does not consider France an honest player, but who could? It is also suspicious of Russia, though not irrevocably so. And above all else, Iran is a nation almost immobilized by discord. Friday saw more riots in Tehran. Fighting between supporters of the current junta and it's opponents. When one considers the situation, Obama is most wise to use the confusion in Tehran to consolidate his coalition. The inability of Iran to do what it's most informed and most competent have seen as it's only course of action is an opportunity to further alienate it's most rabid and irrational. No person who is sane can not understand why a nation which has face imminent threat of attack or invasion for the last 9 years would not take many of the actions which Iran has. Think.

  • 17. 0 0
    Suddenly, I find myself responding to a different article
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 25.10.09
    • 03:22

    The substance of my reply remains true.

  • 16. 0 0
    For Niv # 9 (The P5+1 and ElBaradei's IAEA want Iran to have it).
    • Fortuna Benmayor
    • 25.10.09
    • 00:51

    Not only Iran wants that 1/4 of its Uranium for their bomb. The cynical P5 + 1 as well as El Baaradei's IAEA want Iran to build it. They are extending a red carpet of legitimacy for Iran's uranium enrichment too. Israel, as the most threatened country by Iran, is tied up so it should not cry foul.

  • 15. 0 0
    balalaika
    • c. schmidt
    • 25.10.09
    • 00:05

    as fare as I am concerned I am less concerned about mister medejev than everything before him-I think it was the right desicion to bring the russians a little bit in under present circumstances which became recently kind of just lest name it delicate. caucious diplomacy hopefully will show soon peace establishing resulsts in middle terms and if wise managed could have even in long term good effect.

  • 14. 0 0
    Why is Netanyahu silent about this further enrichment?
    • Steve Klein
    • 24.10.09
    • 23:42

    Why won't he say anything? How can he allow this to happen unopposed?

  • 13. 0 0
    #5 David. So you think you can trust a "diplomatic partner?"
    • Maureen Ann
    • 24.10.09
    • 22:57

    Israel is always seeking assurance of undivided loyalty from America, and America is forever on the look-out for Israeli spies! The tail and the dog don't trust one another!

  • 12. 0 0
    Iran knows how to raise and lower tensions at will
    • Kelly Brians
    • 24.10.09
    • 22:38

    Past few weeks, Iran lowered the tensions and gave Obama a breather. Now it is raising tensions again. By mid December there will be another "breakthrough" (engineered). And then the focus will shift to Palestinian elections. Then there are the Afghan re-elections, Goldstone report, Gilad Shcalit, etc, etc to keep the diplomacy endlessly busy. And then one day US will sign a new middle east deal, all but accepting Iran's rule in ME in exchange for continued oil supplies. As for Israel, Iran will deliver to the palestinians its promise of a one-state solution with Palestinian majority. Netanyahu is doing a great job for Iran by dragging his feet on the so called two-state solution, in the hope that Obama will cave in to an Israeli-style fantasy of bombing Iran's nuclear site and engineering a regime change - similar to Iraq.

  • 11. 0 0
    Ex Lebanese
    • Gil
    • 24.10.09
    • 21:00

    Ex Lebanese Hummus is from Egypt And yes, also our Jewish community there, was kicked out, fleeing to Israel taking their cuisine with them, including the Hummus! By the way, the Yemeni Jewish community, make wonderful Falafel And SH`ug

  • 10. 0 0
    diplomacy itself was imposed to serve the west
    • stranger
    • 24.10.09
    • 20:35

    thats why diplomacy does not exist in muslim nations!trying to fool iran...no chance. the fools are the arrogant brains in the west.

  • 9. 0 0
    Caught out
    • Niv
    • 24.10.09
    • 20:08

    If Iran only wants the uranium for fuel then why do they need to keep what they've got in addition to the nuclear fuel supplied by the West? They see no link? The link is clear.

  • 8. 0 0
    HELLLOOOO. Iran is stalling.....
    • Saul
    • 24.10.09
    • 20:06

    Let's see, Iran says we will think about it. Then they say they are being cheated. So let's talk about being cheated. Then let's talk about talking about being cheated. Then let's talk about talking about talking about being cheated and then set a time table about talking about being cheated.... At the same time they are making a nuclear bomb...

  • 7. 0 0
    IRAN. Ha! Ha! Ha!
    • The Teacher/Instruct
    • 24.10.09
    • 19:27

    IRAN. Once again fooling the world. Playing for time. Trying to get more concessions from a decadant & crumbling West. Her goal: a N.bomb ! If your ears were attentive enough,you would have heard ELbradie telling the Iranians to go ahead with their N.Programme while he will keep those who bother him at arms length ! He will not allow anybody to hamper Iran's ambition in getting the Bomb. Who put this Joker in charge !?

  • 6. 0 0
    Actually it is Iran that is intent on cheating, not the West...
    • Esther
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:54

    ... if Iran's only intention had been civilian, then they should have jumped-for-joy that their almost-ally Russia is prepared to do the 'dirty-work' for them... (altho' am not so sure that they would have been equally delighted with France, who is on kissing-terms with Israel...)

  • 5. 0 0
    Iran can't be trusted as a diplomatic partner
    • David
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:32

    It is clear Iran's intent is to use its uranium toward deveolping nuclear weapons and that it has no intention of cooperating with the West. Until the West recognizes that an iron fist is the only diplomatic language Iran understands, the West will continue to be jerked around by the Teheran government.

  • 4. 0 0
    If Iran balks, it will put Russia behind sanctions
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:30

    Russia has made it quite clear it will support stronger sanctions if Iran balks.

  • 3. 0 0
    funnnyyyyy
    • S
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:12

  • 2. 0 0
    What do you Expect?
    • Annon
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:10

    I am amazed that Iran even began to take this deal seriously. Why would a nation give up so much for so little in return? Indeed, there was even the suspicion (not just in Iran) that once the Uranium was shipped out, Iran could wave goodbye to ever seeing it again in any form - fuel rods or whatever. Despite what the hate filled may think, Iran is not in any position to realistically threaten Israel, never mind the nonsence about threatening European cities and the mainland US. If the west / israel want to extract the uranium from Iran they may like to offer them something just as valuable or more valuable in return - I beleive this used to be know as 'negotiation'. By the way - threats of bombing a nations infrastructure and killing its people is not a very sophisticated way to keep a nation at the negotiating table.

  • 1. 0 0
    The only thing the West is interested in, is the West.
    • Kris Lazar
    • 24.10.09
    • 18:07

    And nothing else. I wouldn't advice anyone to trust promises that have no benefits to the promising states, they are never kept.