Norway FM to Barak: Israel is a friend despite Elbit divestment
Israel opts for low-key response after Norway pulls out of Elbit deals, in order to avoid crisis with Oslo.
By Amira Hass and Barak Ravid Tags: Norway Israel news SwedenInvestments Norway divested from the Israeli arms firm Elbit were part of a private fund and did not represent the country's policy, the country's minister of foreign affairs told Defense Minster Ehud Barak on Friday.
Norway's Minister of Foreign Affairs Jonas Gahr Støre told Barak, who had called to protested Norway's decision to withdraw funds from Elbit on account of its involvement with the West Bank separation fence, that the investment fund in question was private, one which the government had no control over.
The Norwegian minister also pointed out that Norway recently increased its investments in Israel and that it considered Israel its friend.
On Thursday, Norway's ambassador to Israel Jakken Bjorn Lian said that Norway's decision to pull all of its investments from the Israeli arms firm Elbit does not amount to a boycott of Jerusalem.
According to Lian, the same measures could have been taken against any other country, including neighboring Sweden.
The Foreign Ministry opted for a low-key response on Thursday after Norway announced its divestment, in order to avoid a crisis in relations with Oslo.
Though the ministry originally planned a harsh response, it ultimately issued a statement saying merely that "Israel will consider further protest measures in the future."
Foreign Ministry Director General Yossi Gal held telephone consultations yesterday with Israel's ambassador to Oslo, Michael Eligal, and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who is currently in Ethiopia.
Later, Gal met with Lian to voice Israel's vehement objection to the decision to divest from the electronics firm.
The Foreign Ministry's decision not to adopt a more strident tone stemmed from the Norwegian ambassador's explanations of the divestment decision, as well as a decision by Lieberman to avoid opening a second diplomatic front in Europe in view of the ongoing crisis in ties with Sweden.
Lieberman has said that the Swedish government's refusal to condemn the content of an article in Aftonbladet, a Swedish tabloid, that accused Israeli soldiers of harvesting the organs of Palestinians they shot and killed "is like Sweden's stance during World War II."
The latest crisis began when Norway's finance minister, Kristin Halvorsen, announced at a press conference in Oslo that the country had decided to divest from Elbit Systems due to its role in supplying technology for the separation fence.
The decision followed a recommendation issued by the Ethics Committee, whose role is to ensure that the government's investments abroad are in line with its ethical guidelines. The finance minister said Norway is not interested in funding a company so "blatantly involved in violating international humanitarian law."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
The security barrier (the "Wall") has nothing to do with any international border. Israel-Jordan: the agreed upon border was set to be the Jordan river. The Jordan-Israel Peace Treaty was signed on October 26, 1994. So far, the anti-terrorist barriers in Gaza and in Judea/Samaria have served there purpose very well. They continue to save lives in Israel, Arab lives included. Their technologies were developed so much they are produced for exports to the world. Neither Norway nor the ICJ had much issue with the barrier around the islamist entity ruling in Gaza. Norway's ambassador to Israel confirmed the step was a political half-measure for internal consumption before the upcoming general elections in Norway. Translation: not permanent and not irreversible. There will be a new government in Norway this month. Relax everyone.
Divesting Elbit is probably not a bad idea given the number of systems it is producing components for which are being examined for cuts in upcoming US defense budgets. The US is going to HAVE to make massive budget cuts to rebalance the budget and prevent inflation caused by a decade of massive budget deficits, largely imposed by the Bush administration's policy of paying for two wars with tax cuts. One is the V-22, another the badly botched Kollsman/Boeing contract with Homeland Security. The private fund has every right to move it's money where it wants, but there are much more sound reasons for divesting Elbit stock than the one they gave for doing so.
The wall you are referring to goes ALONG the border, not inside Pakistan. Key difference.
It is getting more and more obvious that Israel is suffering from at mass psychosis. Dare you disagree with us you're no less than anti-semites. Dare you divest (i.e. pulling out your own money) we will punish you. Only acceptable position is a 100% compliance with Israeli views and needs - after all Israel is a democracy! The good part is that the world is starting to realize that Israel should be treated a psychiatric patient.
Would Norway divest from India? India has a security fence along the border with Pakistan. All kinds of countries, all over the world, have security fences. Why are they only divesting from Israel?
will be more and more important for successfull investors woldwide. Is Israel aware of this? It better should, because one day, without intermixing of "political arguments" investors might be hindered by their actionnaires to invest in israeli companies which strengthen OPT an East Jerusalem colonization. In this case, "low profile" responses will not help any longer.
...but a boycott of Israel's illegal practices. And "Sweden's stance during World War II" was to provide a safe haven to tens of thousands of refugees from all over Europe, including numerous jews from Norway, Finland and Denmark. What exactly was Lieberman referring to? Wow, quarreling with Norway and Sweden, two of the most evil and hateful countries in the world.. way to go Israel!
Norway heavily invests in the military Junta led country of Burma.