New law to deal tougher with cyber sex with minors
New law to impose 2 year sentence on making sexual suggestions to minors via internet or telephone.
By Ruth SinaiThe Knesset yesterday approved a law in final reading that imposes a maximum sentence of two years in jail on any adult who makes sexual suggestions to a minor via the Internet or telephone.
For the purpose of this law, a minor is defined as someone below age 15.
The law, sponsored by MKs Zevulun Orlev (National Religious Party) and Nadia Hilou (Labor), states that making sexual suggestions to a minor will be considered a crime even if the minor makes no objection, since their tender age sometimes makes it difficult for youngsters to understand that a suggestion is objectionable or to challenge an adult.
"Every sexual deviant should know that even if he did not intend to commit a crime, and only wanted to talk in a chat room, the moment he suggests something sexual to a minor, he is breaking the law," said Dr. Yitzhak Kadman, director of the Council for the Welfare of the Child, who drafted the bill for Orlev and Hilou.
Kadman based the bill on Australia's legislation against "cyber sex." He said that Israel is one of the few countries in the world that has adopted this model.
The 1998 law against sexual harassment, which the new law amends, made sexual suggestions to minors a crime only if there was a relationship of authority or dependency between the adult and the minor. The new law makes such suggestions criminal even if no relationship of dependency exists.
"The law is meant to be stricter on those who hurt children," said Orlev. "It closes a loophole that previously prevented the indictment of adults who exploited minors' innocence."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
"Cyber crimes" are usually carried out with high anonymity and most cyber criminals go to extreme measures to protect themselves by stealing someone else's identity. Such an act might cause a child to wrongfully accuse an innocent person, especially if the child only knows the cyber-pervert via a faceless chatroom. This law isn't popular around the world because of possible moral implications with respect to reasonable doubt. That said, I think it could be fixed up a bit and made into something useful to protect kids from cyber-perverts and the like.