Thousands march in Tel Aviv against loyalty oath bill
Hadash MK Dov Khenin warns concept of a population transfer of Israel's Arab citizens has turned from a nightmare into an operational plan.
By Asaf Shtull-Trauring Tags: Israel news Tel Aviv Dov Khenin loyalty oathThousands marched in Tel Aviv on Saturday evening in a joint Jewish-Arab protest against the cabinet's approval of a controversial amendment to the citizenship bill, requiring non-Jews seeking citizenship to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.
|
Left-wing demonstration against loyalty oath bill in Tel Aviv on October 16, 2010. |
| Photo by: Tal Cohen |
The demonstrators marched carrying signs reading "Jews and Arabs refuse to be enemies" and "Together we will protect the democratic space". Among the organizers of the protests were Hadash, Meretz, The Green Movement, and Gush Shalom parties and many social and human rights organizations.
Top political figures delivered speeches during the demonstration, among them Hadash MK Dov Khenin, Meretz MK Haim Oron, Hadash MK Mohammed Barakeh, and journalist Merav Michaeli.
Khenin warned that the idea of a population transfer of Israel's Arab citizens to a Palestinian state started as a nightmare, but has since transformed into a practical plan.
"The statement 'The Arab citizens of Israel are the true demographic threat' was not uttered by Rabbi Meir Kahane or Avigdor Lieberman, but by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Jerusalem conference. Two years ago, the idea of population transfer was a slogan of extreme right-wing parties. A month ago it was the subject of an official speech by the Foreign Minister in the United Nations," Khenin said.
"Friends, the population transfer has turned from a nightmare into an operational plan. Against this we stand here today."
|
"In Nuremberg it also began with legislation!" / "Not loyal to Lieberman!" / "If there's racism, there will be no loyalty!" |
| Photo by: Tal Cohen |
Meretz MK Oron also condemned the loyalty oath bill, calling it racist and anti-democratic.
"This anti-democratic attack of legislation was meant to exclude the Arab population from the democratic game and to eternalize an ethnocentric right-wing regime in the government," said Oron. "The Knesset has 11 bills pending, and each one of them oozes with racism."
Last week, cabinet ministers approved by a majority vote a controversial amendment which would require every non-Jew wishing to become a citizen of Israel to pledge loyalty to "the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state."
The amendment is one of the promises Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made to Avigdor Lieberman's Yisrael Beitenu party in the coalition agreements. Since coming into government Yisrael Beitenu has advanced a long list of "loyalty" laws, which many consider to be discriminatory against Israel's Arab citizens.
|
"The voice is the voice of Lieberman, but the hands are the hands of Netanyahu" (Biblical reference meaning here that Netanyahu supports Lieberman's extreme statements). |
| Photo by: Tal Cohen |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Israel was created by the UN as a refuge for all Jews who were oppressed around the world. The Arabs did not like it and have fought several wars with Israel and lost. The peace treaties between Israel and the Arab States allow Israel, on a practical basis, to be the a home for the Jewish People. Israel's Arab population should always have equality with the Jewish population. New immigrants from anywhere and of any background should be loyal to the State of Israel. This requirement is true in accepting US Citizenship and citizenship in most democracies around the world. Why should any state accept citizens who intend to be "criminally" disloyal?
This has nothing to do with loyalty. Any expression of fidelity (loyalty) given under duress has no real meaning. The girl who 'demands' the guy tell her he loves her in order to sleep with her is doing a good job of selecting dishonest lovers.
The state of Israel was created by the UN in 1947 under a plan to divide the territory into JEWISH & ARAB states. The loyalty oath does not affect ANY Israeli-arabs. It does not take away any of their rights. It only demands that NEW non-Jewish citizens recognize the obvious, that Israel is a Jewish, democratic state. It doesn't require them to follow Judaism, just to respect the foundation of the state of Israel.
It can not take any of their rights - they don't have too many.
I noticed that in all the photos I've seen of this event, overwhelmingly those protesting are students. I wonder, how many of them were organized for this event by their teachers and professors? Were they prodded to attend because of a left wing indoctrination? Did they receive extra credit for attending? Was attendance recorded? These are serious questions. What are our children being taught? I remember what it is to be young and impressionable.
I was there and I can tell you that I was surprised to see so many families there. Demonstrations are generally more attended to by the 20-ish people that worry for their future and have more free time on their hands than they are by busy working people with families. But luckily in this event there where people from all places in Israel (many travelled for hours by bus to be there) and with all different backgrounds. In the university I didn't hear a word about this demonstration from my professors, so no worries there. I sincerely hope that people will start to realise that this is not a regular loyalty pledge, as it would be a loyalty pledge to the declaration of independence (because of the lack of a constitution). It is a loyalty pledge to the jewishness of the state. And because this bill was drafted by lieberman and shass, I don't think that I will agree to what they see as 'jewish'. Besides that I wonder what will be considered to be 'disloyal'. As long as nobody sincerely answers the question what is 'jewish' and what is 'disloyal' nobody can predict the effect of this draft bill, and thus nobody should agree with it.
To make the law not so obviously racist ,any immigrant would have to pledge loyalty like in the US . The problem is where does that lead us to , there is no constitution to be loyal to that protects at least in theory all citizens regardless of color religion political affiliation. So such a bill can soon , or should I say ,is likely t olead to facism where a government in powerd edmandslpyaltie and persecutes those who disagree.....
Shows that the people of Israel reject their message of despair.
It is too bad I didn't know about the rally - I would have loved an oppurtunity to show my frustration with the current administration and there racist policies.
Would Jews be happy to swear on a US Christian State, or leave the country...could get pretty packed in rassist Israel soon! Shame on you guys!
In most democracies, loyalty oaths are for the military or special departments of the government. It is not appropriate in this case. If Israel does not want to accept everyone who wants to be an Israeli, there should be a fair and just process to admit a specified number of "acquired" citizen every year. Arabs who live in Israel would be just one category.
The loyalty law may actually create more trust in the Arab citizens of Israel and that may improve their lifes.
Israel is the Jewish homeland and is obligated to defend the rights of all of its willing and loyal citizens. This inspired democracy owes its people and the world freedom and rule of law. The Jewish State, however, owes self destruction to no man, country or ideal. Israelis and Jews the world over must continue to amalgamate the wisdom of our scripture and commentaries with the founding texts of the great democracies. Israel must show the world what it means to be an unapologetically Jewish democracy that is quite the opposite of Saudi Arabia and Iran,
Why are there never any joint rallies in Gaza city with Jews and Arabs demanding Hamas make concessions for peace? Left wing jews are the biggest tools in the universe.
... if not 'population transfer?... it's all-embracing policy with them...
These idiots are our own worst enemies. Lets transfer the entire population of this march to Gaza and let them work for freedom and equality there. They think they live in the sixties, they dont realize they are working against the one free country in the entire middle east.
there is nothing more to say about it.
Not every Arab to be sure. But look at the MK that took a ride on the Mavi Marmara. How can you expect that such a person would ever succeed in a ruling coalition? Be reasonable. Democracy does not mean that everyone wins. That is only an appropriate attitude for wiffle ball moms.
And the Israelis are very friendly to Arabs? What do you expect actually? Especially all the troubles they have with Israel.
If you are treated like a second class citizen of Israel. Is rather difficult to love Israel - or not Israel as a country but as a nation only for jewish people (The Jewish Israel) .
So much that you hear from Israels leaders and the comments here are so negative. The moderates everywhere get drowned out by extremist views. It would be great if supporters in the West would donate money to these groups instead.
Remember the holocaust - remember your own history of persecution and reflect on what you are doing to the Palestinians - SHAME
far too many expressions of disloyalty to the state, too much sympathy for the avowed enemies of Israel, and outright anti-Semitism... these have all clearly radicalized many Israeli Jews who, just a few years ago, would have never considered a population transfer... Arab Israelis, especially when they go abroad and are more free to express themselves, barely (if at all) acknowledge their "Israeliness"... moreover, many actively disparage Israel, and call for its destruction... It is unfortunate that they seem to think that such expressions of loathing of the Jewish state go unnoticed, or somehow shouldn't be taken seriously... but that is not the case. They are noticed and they have been taken quite seriously. From the relative comforts of Tel Aviv, leftwing Jews may not recognize this...
The word doesn't appear ANYWHERE. http://wp.me/pDB7k-D6 “THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel;” The prophets of Israel are a religious notion = theocratic. Deuteronomy 20: perhaps?
I know that Israel has transformed itself into a "secular" society... but... I think some Israeli's have forgotten a central point.... it was founded & created by the UN as a place for Jewish People to settle....
.....as a place for jewish people to settle, they did not meann kick all the others ouit.
In the event of a serious dust-up between Israel and surrounding Arab states (include Palestinians), which side would you fight for or support? That is the place you should be living. Muslims are allowed to lie to infidels, but not to themselves. The swap proposal is a golden opportunity to integrate your soul with your mind. Why would any sane person reject this?
Both sides have been in the wrong for so long, committed so many atrocities that I would support or fight for neither.* *Palestinians, however, have long been the pawn and whipping boy for both sides.
Jews are allowed to lie, cheat, and steal from goyim, but not from other Jews. How is this any different?
The reason the peace process has gone off the rails Is that the coalitions ruling in the Knesset never seem to include any Arab parties. Therefore no true democracy.
I do not understand why some make comments such as "In a state such as Iran or Gaza (which is not a state technically) these demonstrators would have been shot. Why do right-wingers say that Israel has accomplished something just because it's not like some of the most backward countries in the world. These are our standards? Shouldn't we be aiming to be more like say, Britain, France and Switzerland? You know, Western, advanced countries? Aren't those the standard?
Second to the worst is OK.
Like Britain, soon to be governed by Sharia law, like France, which would not defend against the Nazis, and like Switzerland,which was pro nazi.
are you kidding me??? maybe you should go back and read the history of these places. much much much worst then Israel will ever be
This is exactly what I've been saying too. It's very ironic. The substance of the argument is rarely addressed. Rather, the apologists just point to the world's other racist and oppressive regimes and complain that Israel is being singled out (also not true - just read the coverage on Iran or North Korea in any American newspaper)
The entire point of democracy is the inclusion of disparate groups and the protection of minority rights. Israel, on the other hand, attempts to rid itself of all non-Jews and openly makes discriminatory laws to this end. Democracies do not have state religions which make the laws of the nation. Democracies do not debate "relocating" entire cities of minorities. Yo can call Israel a democracy if you like, but that does not make it one.
. no mention of democracy ... " it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel;” The 'prophets of Israel' are a religious notion = theocratic. http://wp.me/pDB7k-D6
Or any other country, for that matter. Every country has its own history, its own problems to confront, and the local environment is important in how this development evolves. It is not true that democracies and religions are mutually exclusive. Look at England.
the point of democracy is equality of citizens under the law. the point of democracy is to protect the individual against the tyranny of the state. "Inclusion" does not apply to those who ask for permission to enter the state or to those who ask for citizenship. democracy is essentially for the protection of citizens and to a lesser extent to residents. states, as sovereigns, have an absolute right to legislate their laws of immigration and citizenship. furthermore, israel does not have a state religion any more than the us does. muslims, christians and others have absolute freedom to practice their religion. your only valid point is regarding the "relocation" of cities and their citizens. it is precisely because they are citizens that such a plan is anti-democratic. they cannot be deprived of their citizenship without their free consent.
All the European countries have separation of the State and the Church - they protect the rights if all the Citizens, regardless of their religion. Israel should take this as an example of a real democracy.
Once in a while, we might get Natallie (aka Yaakov Sullivan) to speak the truth. But in response to his/her latest lie: UK, Sweden, Denmark, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Thailand, Indonesia, Norway - ALL are officially designated by their religions!
With the stranglehold of the orthodox on religion, non orthodox jews are prevented from practicing reform and conservative branches of Judaism.
These people miss the good 'ol days of being Dhimmis to the Arabs. Back when they couldn't own land. Couldn't build synagogues taller than mosques. Couldn't ride horses because that would make them taller than Muslims. Didn't have political rights. Ahhh...the good 'ol days.
They were good indeed, compared to what the very civilized west was doing to non-believers! And how everywhere else in the world people were treating those of different faiths! It is actually the Arabs that started the whole coexistence theories of modern times, true, they don't comply with today's standards, but hell yea they were on the top of the world, unlike the fascist state of Israel today, at the very bottom!
People like you always bring up the "dhimmi status" argument to prove an asinine point of yours. The Jews and Muslims were treated just as horribly under Christian rule, probably even worse, than the Jews were treated under Muslim rule. Wasn't it the Ottoman Empire who rescued and ferried Jews, along with Muslims, back to Muslim lands when the conditions became completely unbearable for both Jews and Muslims alike in Christian lands?
So you think it's now permissable to make arabs dhimmis
When the US takes in an immigrant there is a loyalty oath to the nation. Israel is Jewish and democratic. It just happens to have a hostile Arab minority. For this reason, Israel should not be taking in Arabs from anywhere for any reason. Even in Jordan it is a death penalty for a Jew to own property or for an Arab to sell to a Jew. The loyalty oath is pretty benign. 6,000 demonstrators are hardly a majority in Israel.
You mean the majority is Jewish and so can make any laws they like? This is the opposite of a democracy. Maybe when the Democrats had a fillibuster proof majority, they should have outlawed the Republican party, or better yet, forced them to swear loyalty to the Democrats.
Our loyalty oath is to the Constitution. Yours is racist.
well well...go....go people... go young people... go the old and the free... go show the zionists that you will be heard... all the way to ellohim
Population transfer does NOT mean pick up Palestinians and move them. It means transfer the land they live on to the control of the government they have rioted over controlling them. No Palestinians will be moved from the land they own! But the demonstrations prove that what the Palestinians and their leftist supporters really want is an end to Israel, not peace
I thought they were removed in 1948, what is new now? is it the sudden realization guilt?
Transfering their land to government ownership makes it OK Patriot? You're kidding right?
Jake - Leibermen proposes redrawing the border to include some Arab majority areas of Israel in a future Palestinian state. This is hugely different to nationalising their land or kicking them out of their homes
Wake up o' ye Israel - the fascists are coming to YOU...and there's no telling what path they're going to lead you down...only that it WILL be down.
for yet again proving our point: Had this type of demonstration against a proposed government initiative taken place in any of your beloved Islamist states like Iran, Gaza, Turkey, and Egypt, the "riot" police would have simply turned off the TV cameras and opened fire. Haaretz would have relegated the report to some paragraph on a back page and let it die with the demonstrators. Yet her, in the DEMOCRATIC Jewish State, Jew AND Arab that opposed the suggestion walked openly and without fear. PROVES THE POINT MADE. You CAN be a Jewish State AND be democratic for all your citizens. I realize this was not your intent, but thanks anyway
What the loyalty oath does is to tell those who are not Jewish, that they have no place in the "democratic " state of Israel. Most Islamic states that you refer to(especially Turkey and Egypt), the constitution is not a sharia law,so your point is not made,but since you like to be compared to these countries, consider this: Egypt is an Islamic country,but it is not called as such,does not apply the Sharia Law,and does not require naturalised citizens to swear allegiance to an Islamic Egypt, yet no one doubt that it is an Islamic state. Get it now?
What the loyalty oath does is to tell those who are not Jewish, that they have no place in the "democratic " state of Israel. Most Islamic states that you refer to(especially Turkey and Egypt), the constitution is not a sharia law,so your point is not made,but since you like to be compared to these countries, consider this: Egypt is an Islamic country,but it is not called as such,does not apply the Sharia Law,and does not require naturalised citizens to swear allegiance to an Islamic Egypt, yet no one doubt that it is an Islamic state. Get it now?
Those who are not jewish could be part of Israel democracy . They have to pledge loyalty to the jewish democratic state. nOTHING ELSE. By different means France is also explaining newcomers that they have to accept and be loyal to the principles of secular state that "hates" religions. Any religion by the way. Why should a pyus Muslim pay respect to that nation. ? However if he wants to be included , he MUST PAY LOYALTY TO SOMETHING THAT HIS CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT ALLOW TO. See the difference??? I dont.
Erdogan's party in power in Turkey has openly stated that they will be moving to remove secularism from Turkey after the next election if they win
Q: If you are going to make prospective immigrants take this oath, then why not make ALL the applicants take it? A: Because an ultra-orthodox Jew would refuse to take an oath to a democratic (as opposed to a halachal) state, and that Would Never Do. This oath is a racist outrage, because it is specifically targetted at one group (the goys) who would refuse it, while it deliberately excludes another group (the ultra-orthodox) who would also refuse it.
Because as jew in a democratic state i have the right to think and say that israel is not a democratic state,no?, if israel was a democratic state u could not obligate people to have ur same ideas.
I think everybody should take the oath or renew it, non jewish AND jewish alike
... the Rio Grande at night don't like a loyalty oath either. Myself, I think it is natural and sorta cool. Learned it in the 2nd grade. "I pledge alliegence ..."
The idea that Americas elementary schools is filled with red blooded patriots is comforting, but most of those kids don't even understand the words they are reciting. By the time they are old enough to understand in higher grades, the pladge is no longer recited. Actually. it makes no sense to require loyalty oaths from people who don't understand them. It makes less sense to coerce loyalty oaths from people under any circumstances. There is no democracy in the world that includes a religion in its name.
What ever happened to the 'huddled masses yearning to breath free'? As long as they're from Europe?
How wonderful. The Israeli left might be rising from it's slumber. The plans of Lieberman and Netanyahu are finally being challenged.
If each person brought 10 friends, the next protest would have not 15,000 but 150,000 people.
We are not welcome in SA UAE and so on.... All arabs should be paid to leave... zehu zeh
or something better.
You are sure welcome in SA & UAE if you're a jew... As llong as you don't hold an israeli passport.
Hitler and the spanish Catholic Kings did the same thing. After Spain was declared a christian state, the jews and moorish were obliged to convert or to leave the country... like Likud. Either Israel is a democratic state or is a "jewish" state, hence a fascist state.
Nobody has to convert to judaism to become an israel citizen. The state is jewish menaing with it that the public sphere is jewish. Muslim Christian citizens are equal right citizens. The state will always have a jewish majority. What is the problem with that? What fascism are you talking about.? All have civic liberal rights.
But what if the Israeli agenda is to kick the Palestinians out to Jordan.
Nowhere is it to be read in Arabic. The thousands seem hundreds, and the hundreds have the same, uniformed banners. Hardly a whopper of a protest.
how many? please tell us. You have no idea do you?
Left my ass, there is no left in Israel, from the TelAviv disco hopper to the street paver, all are part of this disposession of another people. If there is common decency in Israel these protests must explode to the 100s of thousands. Bibi and the other criminals must be driven out. Regime change is another possible savior.
Those disposessed poor victims have left cemetaries full of dead INNOCENT JEWS. The country is scattered with tens of thousands of people, maimed for life. Their crime ?? They went to a mall, they boarded the wrong bus. Oh, and they went to get a coffee, or a pizza, only to be blown away, in a nanosecond. Don't lecture us, Victor, about *common decency* when pregnant Jewish women are used for target practice. The lowlife thugs you defend have no devency in their lexicon. If anything, Israel has exhibited unnecessary compassion to an enemy so brutal and devoid of decency. You side with the aggressor, against the true, innocent victim. One day, this aggressor will be crushed into submission, for all the tremendous damage they have caused. Then, and only then, can we finally have the long-sought peace we yearn for. Bibi is only partially the answer, However, he's not forceful enough to stand up to the Arab thuggery. Perhaps Lieberman will sort it all out. You all can scream fascism, we will do all to PROTECT the Jewish people, from the likes of a brutal enemy, and the likes of people like you.
of all tel avivi leftists of course. To their beloved brothers in ramallah or gaza-their choice.
The Jewish tradition for justice is hanging in. To ask others to support a state that is not based on separation of region and state is to be the Taliban.
Is this another attempt to piss absolutely EVERYONE off?
62 years ago Israel was not blessed with the brilliant mind, diplomatic eloquence and oratorial skills of Mr. Lieberman.
Yes, they did, even though the first 15 years or so Israel treated Arabs as third class citizens. So what has changed? The men ruling Israel, Lieberman and Netanyahu need to create an internal enemy which must be oppressed to save the nation. What better than the Demographic Bomb, threatening the Jewish State? The last 62 years of Israeli history are insignificant in the face of the need by Lieberman and Netanyahu to create hysteria over the Demographic Bomb, and the need to demand Loyalty to the Jewish (only) State. One Nation! One People! No Arabs! Got it?
near nonstop terrorism, arab war after arab war. Its time Israel stop this self defeating attitude and become a strong Jewish nation. Its time to stop being afraid to make the non Jewish world who will hate us no matter what upset at us. When a country like the mighty U.S.A defends itself it doesnt apologize to anybody. Am Yisroel Chai. Od avinu chai. We are begining to wise up and are no longer willing to be the abused step children of the world. Chazak ve'amatz!
If you reimburse them for transfer whats the big deal . The government transferred 10000 Jews from Gaza. Anyhow there is no state to transfer anyone to yet. There is friction between some Israeli arabs and Jews thats clear although not all of them. So maybe some land and people swaps makes sense but we aren't up to that yet. Everything is just talk and not even talk
Jews didn't like it when it was done to them. Treat others as you would have them treat you. That's a Jewish concept! Live it!
Israel transfered its Jews out of Gaza? Uprooted families? Did you know that Gaza has housed Jews for thousands of years? Its a true Jewish homeland. Its funny how you loud silly righteousness only works one way.
Hamas is not the only enemy. These Lefties would invite the same Arabs into their midst, who would have no qualms detonating a suicide bomber right in the middle of the march. How sad a society, where the true victim is oppressed while the terrorists are forgiven. Much like an abused wife, who blames herself, saying she deserves her abuse. What a sad Israeli segment of society. Are they really Jews, I doubt it. Ignorant, certainly.
Ben Gurion and other zionists established the Jewish State in 1948. It says "the Jewish State of Israel.." in their original Proclamation of Independence historic document.
In most democracies, loyalty oaths are for the military or special departments of the government. It is not appropriate in this case. If Israel does not want to accept everyone who wants to be an Israeli, there should be a fair and just process to admit a specified number of "acquired" citizen every year. Arabs who live in Israel would be just one category.
almost all bussed in from Sderot and neighbouring communities prior to the Gaza war. What does that tell you about the residents of Tel Aviv? A hell of a lot!
It is sad but it is truth.
Which Arab state loves Jews? 0 Israel sees what the Muslims are doing to the U.S. population and they don't want to get caught up in it. Japan segregates. Korea segregates. Ireland segregates.
Israel did not suddenly become a racist state, it has always been one. The whole Zionist take-over of Palestine was based on a racist concept.
The right wing in Israel is wrong in demanding a loyalty oath based on religion. In American how would Jews feel if we had to pledge our allegiance to the Christian nation of America? We are but 2% of the population, but America does not insist on such an oath. Furthermore, the right wing is now insisting that they will not agree to a settlement freeze until the Palestinians recognize the Jewish State of Israel. They never insisted that Egypt and Jordan agree to this before the negotiations, during the negotiations, and in the peace treaties that were signed, and in their back door negotiations with Syria the main thing discussed were security guarantees, not recognizing Israel as a Jewish nation. It seems that the right wing is doing whatever it can to make things worse and ensure that a dispute over land is now a dispute over religion. Former Prime Minister's Rabin, Peres, Barak, and Olmert never insisted on these things so one has to assume Netanyahu is not serious about peace. If he was there would be no facist thug like Leiberman as foreign minister, and no loyalty oath, but Netanyahu seems to be more concerned about what is best for Bibi Netanyahu, not what is best for Israel, and that is not the mark of a true leader.
israel is the historic homeland of the jewish people. the sole purpose of the foundation of the state is to provide a refuge to the jewish people after two thousand years of exile and persecution. zionism is the assertion by the jewish people, headed by the founders, that jews have a right to national self-determination. every sovereign has the right to determine laws of citizenship. israel is both jewish in its ethos and democratic. the pledge required by the united states requires, as has been posted by many, that individuals pledge to renounce all allegiances to foreign sovereigns and that they will defend the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. furthermore, research shows that the united states requires a citizenship test consisting of 98 questions. yet no one calls the united states a fascist state. the proposed israeli loyalty oath does not require loyalty to judaism, but to the character of the state. it is no different than pledging allegiance to the queen. no state can allow immigrants who are not willing to be loyal to the state.
against Netanyahu and Liebermann's fascist state.
Maybe they could simply ask the Germans if they have any of those cattle cars left. You know the ones? After all, it's tantamount to the same disgusting "policy"... Shame! The whole world is watching.....in disgust!
1. Population transfer involves transferring Arab-populated areas to the future Palestinian state in exchange for some settlement blocks, not kicking Arabs out of their homes. 2. The world will do nothing even if Israelis decide to kill every single Arab man, woman and child. Just look at what is going on in the DRC.
for claiming that moving Arabs who work for the demise of Israel over to an Arab state is anywhere close to what the Nazis did to the Jews where they stole them from their homes, seperated them from their families, enslaved them, starved them. Beat them, humiliated them and then gassed them to their death. You compare these as being one in the same? The shame is to YOU and to the entire group of you who perverts the realities of what happened to my fathers mothers brothers and sisters in the Nazi horror camps. Moving an Arab that hates Israel away from Jews to live with his brother Arabs in not what the Nazis did to us. Had they dont that, we would have been thankfull. Shame on you.
good Jews in Israel.
are you pledging allegiance to??? the orthodox? the Zionist? the Extremists, the moderate,the reasonable, the fair , the unfair,. Other pledges in other countries leave ethnicity and religion out of the oath.
Actually it is a fake issue since I can count on one hand the annual number of goyim that receive Israeli citizenship each year. I am sure that they would take an oath to whatever was needed. Requiring people of one religion to swear loyalty to another religion is simply a hot button issue even if it is also a fake issue. If it is not an oath to Judaism, remove the inappropriate word from the oath. It's simple.
It is not "an oath to Judaism", it does not require people to swear loyalty to another religion. It is a loyalty oath for a non-citizen, who wishes to become a citizen of the state, recognizing that the state they are choosing to join as a citizen is Jewish and democratic.
You are correct about the number of non Jews or 'goyim' as you refer to them, requesting Israeli citizen ship. But that is not the underlying issue, with an amendment here a reinterpretation there, all of a sudden the right of return becomes a non issue, which is exactly what the right wing are really up to. I suspect that you are well aware of this Natallie, am I correct? I'm just curious.
Excuse me, what? An oath to Judaism? No, Natallie, keep your extremist ideas, Israel will never do that. It is an oath of loyalty to the country.
Read this: http://www.counterpunch.org/lamb10152010.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/baroud10152010.html
except that when lieberman gets the upper hand thebill will apply to all gentikes.
the oath is not to Judaism, but to a Jewish State, which means that you don't have to be a Jew in a Jewish State, but that you have to be loyal to the Jewish state which means that you will not do anything to stop or try stopping it from being a Jewish State for the Jewish people.
Perhaps you would be happier with an oath to "the non jewish" state of Israel. However, I don't think you will be happy until the oath is to the Islamic state of Israel. This will not happen
Even though the world (including Israeli thinkers) insists such is a contradiction - but that's the arrogance of Israel .
Israel should embrace the idea that its a state of all religions if it wishes to present itself as a democracy. No limitations, no boundaries. Every single person should be included, not left out.
Nobody is asking anybody to swear an oath of loyalty to jews or judaism but to a JEWISH STATE. Israel has from day 1 - present day officially defined itself as a jewish state. In a country like the UK if your a foreigner and you want to take citizenship you must swear an oath of loyalty to the queen. What happens if you have a die hard republican who hates everything to do with the concept of monarchy but we are saying you want citizenship you swear loyalty to royalty? Should the UK stop demanding an oath of loyalty sworn to the queen because we should consider the views of the republicans who want citizenship? All this oath basically means is you recognize Israel is a jewish state and you swear loyalty to it as that. If they don't like the idea of recognizing Israel as a jewish state and swearing loyalty to it then nobody is holding a gun to their head and saying become a citizen and swear this oath... They want something ( citizenship ) and so we are allowed to demand something from them as a price for that citizenship ( a loyalty oath to Israel as a jewish state ). This doesn't affect the arabs or any other Israeli citizen that idea is a creation of the arabs and the politically correct leftists who believe we should not ask people to recognize Israel is a jewish state, many of them would feel happier if Israel did give up its jewish identity. This oath has been blown totally out of proportion and is there anything wrong with demanding that somebody who wants to become a citizen recognize the states chosen identity and swear loyalty to it?
It was after the 6 days war, we should have accepted "Gandi's" plan of immediate establishment of THE STATE OF ISMAEL". Every one would have been happy. Instead of this we waited for the arab countries to come toward us. How foolish we were, only it does not help to cry about a spilled milk, it will not come again. And thus we must be happy with BIBI lieberman Shas and the colonies. POOR ISRAEL
States do not create states. Look up the word INDEPENDENCE
What is this bs issue about ? Even in the US there is a loyalty pledge when a foreigner becomes a US citizen.
We do not throw out non-Gentiles. Salaam/Shalom
When you become a new citizen of America you do not proclaim your allegiance to the Christian Nation of America, you proclaim your allegiance to America.
Democracy is for multi faith no just chosen one
Yeah but do they pledge allegiance to Roman Catholicism, or the white American heritage in the US?
You know full well it's not the same thing. Their pledge is all about protecting their country, and mentions nothing about their ethnic make up. Very unlike dear Avigdor's plan.
To a Religion there is a pledge in the US? Deal with it that is fascism! Milosevic style!
As a native born I have not had to take an oath/pledge as Avi calls it. However, I believe that whatever it is called the pledgor is not required to recognize my country as a Christian nation. What is your response Avi?
to the state: to defend and support the constitution and the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. There is no loyalty oath to the "Christian and democratic" state of the United States.
not only certain sector pledges to certain type of state such as Christian. What would you say and do if only Jews have to pledge for the US Christian state?
The US supreme Court has ruled that saying the pledge of allegiance is optional. And being a country based on law (still a struggle), that is what the policy has been.
I don't understand whats the big deal about this citizenship bill as it doesn't demand Israeli citizens to do anything. It demands that non jews coming from abroad wanting to be citizens must swear loyalty to a jewish state which is what Israel officially is. In theory jews should be obligated to pledge some some of loyalty oath themselves but unlike non jews they have an automatic right to become a citizen of the jewish state. As for Libermans proposal for population transfer although not admitted is favored by virtually every single mainstream politician but everybody knows its not going to happen. This is just as excuse for the secular comsmopolitan residents of Tel Aviv, arabs and far lestists to come out hold a rally. Tel Aviv wold be a very boring place without the academics, arabs, leftists and sculars coming out to hold a rally now and again have a go at any policy which are not left wing enough or are anti arab. As much as these people seem to hate Israel they should be thankful at least they are allowed to hold these rallies anywhere else in the region they would be in jail for crimes against the state right now.
but why don't they live in Israel? If you're going to bring in millions of Jews from abroad you should make room for them in your own country and leave the West Bank to the Palestinians. That's all the international community wants from you. Borders!
The last thing you need is a Jewish State governed by Jewish law. It would be a Jewish version of Iran. Who wants to see that?
.....how stupid the loyalty bill is? How provocative? Foreign residents of even our enemy countries do not have to pledge allegiance to Islam. Open your eyes. Israeli politicians have turned their people into bigots.
That's why I loved Tel Aviv, people get together and express their views and find things they have in common, like democracy and the other stuff. I would be there with the Arabs at the rally if I were in Israel, it must have been a lot of fun!
Perhaps anti-Israeli marches are allowed throughout the mideast, but Jews are not. So as a skeptic perhaps you can state where Jews can march dude.
it' the loyaty to the "Jewish State" that's the problem. What if the USA decided all Jews have to pledge to the Christian USA. If it were you, how would you feel? Honestly. Further your disrespect for Pals is palbable. "These people"???
the state that you are in regardless for that they are Jewsish, hindi or any other place. You should be Skeptic.
I'm amazed at how many have NOT read the Declaration. Further more OFFICIALLY it ain't a democracy, but " it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel;” The prophets of Israel are a religious notion = theocratic.
Nothing like pulling a leg once in a while...
But Israel IS a JEWISH STATE!!! Whoever wants to live there must pledge loyalty or request citizenship in, i don't know, Iran maybe?
of the "muhtar" Only Israel protects him in TA ,the same State against which he casts his aspersions.
You would never dare get into what is not a White Christian State... You probably never have been to Israel anyways...
The headquarters and the main office are located in Un El Fahm
Jews, including Dov, enter Israeli Palestinian towns and villages all the time. Knaffeh in Nazereth, wicker furniture in Tira, humus in Abu Ghosh.
and scream " Death to Jews! Army of Mahommed is on its way !" Dov Khenin comes to arab places only with permission of muhtars .
Outrageous, the protests, against what? I took an oath to the USA (a Christian country by everyones standards), when I joned civil service. I was not ashamed or alarmed. I have pledged to my country and flag since day 1. While God shoudl be left out..in my opinion..so what? I dont say the word. I also dont sing Noel, Noel during Christmas, but respect the holiday thanks to its Jewish founder. Israel might be better off leaving "Jewish" out howeer, w/o the right of return concerns. It can simply say no, just as Abbas has said, no talks if 250units are planned. (Not built). Israel could plan and shelve construction however for 1 years, or enough time for all this to come to a head. (my advice to Bibi). The Arabs have anagenda..told by Fayyad in Finland last week. What about the road to the Strip, etc. Whennext will the PA threatend to walk out? Assuming they get their state, all issues must be resolved, not piecemeal like the refugees or water/land, Jordan Valley, armies, treaties, as proposed by Abbas. That is a trick. In fact, the entire peace talks are a trick, to slice Israel into pieces, afterwards. Who will stolp Hamas/Hez and Iran?
The US remain a SECULAR State with no official religion. Moreover, the US is a State created on immigration. Hence, taking an oath to the US constitution is nothing like taking an oath declaring that this is not your state but only the one of the "Jews"... Israel is playing a very dangerous game by voluntarily playing between the notion of faith and people when it comes to Judaism...
You didn't say an oath to the USA as a Christian nation. . . that is for sure. So, you've misrepresented this. In Israel what's being asked is that people take what is essentially a sectarian pledge. What people should be asked to do both Jewish and not Jewish, is to pledge to Isael as the eternal homeland of the Jewish people, to obey the laws, and to defned the nation as rewquired by law. This is it.
The whole controversy is about the `Jewish` part.
Guananteed.
Both the Tea Party and republican party (in fact the same) argue that the United States is a 'Christian Nation' and the Roberts Supreme Court is beholden to both.
Those Jobs are retained for Settlers, members of Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu Only Godless Islamofascist loving Liberals would suggest that Israeli Arabs be awarded jobs reserved for political spoils.
to stop the right wing drive.Peace.
So what is being a Jew really? Gotta to have some link to the Bible? If not move to Europe as said so well by as Helen Thomas would say....or simply accept the fact that this state is a religious promise.....