Supreme Court doubles jail term for police officer convicted of shooting Israeli Arab
Shahar Mizrahi was sentenced last year to 15 months in prison for shooting Mahmoud Ganaim, 24, during a 2006 raid on car thieves in Pardes Hannah.
By Jack Khoury and Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news Israel policeThe Supreme Court on Wednesday doubled the sentence for Israel Police officer Shahar Mizrahi, who was convicted of shooting and killing an Israeli Arab, after the latter was suspected of breaking into a vehicle and fleeing the scene.
|
Israel Police officer Shahar Mizrahi, who was convicted of fatally shooting an Israeli Arab in 2006 |
| Photo by: Tess Scheflan |
Mizrahi was sentenced last year to 15 months in prison for shooting Mahmoud Ganaim, 24, during a 2006 raid on car thieves in Pardes Hannah. Police had claimed they shot Ganaim in self-defense after he tried to run over one of the officers. The court ruling doubles his term to 30 months.
Police said that one of the officers approached the suspects and identified himself as a policeman. They said Ganaim began cursing the officer in Arabic, threatening to kill him, and then proceeded to in the car. Police added that officer then pulled his weapon and instructed Ganaim to get out of the car, but that he began driving toward him instead.
Mizrahi had claimed he felt his life was in danger, and that he opened fire in self-defense.
However, the victim's cousin, Waji Ghanaim, who arrived at the scene shortly after the shooting, said that the car was parked on the side of the road at the time of the shooting.
In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Mizrahi said that the shooting was intentional, however, while he claimed his life was not in danger, he insisted he acted out of self-defense.
The Petah Tikva District Court had rejected Mizrahi's account that Ganaim had intended to run him over and the Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision.
"This is a difficult day for the family and the police," said Major General Shimon Cohen, who heads the police's northern district. "The district command and its officers will continue to accompany and support the officer's family in the future as we are doing today."
Meanwhile, Jaffar Farakh, director general of Musawa Center for Arab Rights in Israel welcomed the decision and said that Mizrahi should have been relieved of his duties the day of the incident.
Farakh said the center has been following 45 similar cases, in which Israeli Arabs have been killed by police or in racist incidents, within the past ten years.
Ganaim's family said it plans to sue for damages to cover the suffering caused to them by the police.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
"Only 45 similar incidents" in 10 years. I am now in nice New Zealand . Here,in less than a year, there have been 9 deaths reulting from police car chases. When I was living near Detroit, the number of police shootings and killings was fantastic. Of course law breakers never try to run down people for ideological or criminal reasons in Israe. C.
First: I am an ex-police officer in the U.S. with 18 years of service. When I was trained in 1976, the teaching presented then held that shooting at a car was incorrect. "The rationale was that if the driver was killed the car was then uncontrolled and more injuries were probably from a speeding driverless car that from a car that was being used to elude or escape. Part of our training was based on the existing law that held that shooting (or throwing anything) at a car constituted a 'terroristic threat or act' persuant to the law of that same title. That act is a felony. I do not agree that it is permissible to shoot at cars for any reason except in military controlled security zones (for the purpose of stopping car bomber). Shooting at the car as it drives past you is pointless because the threat to you is over. Second, It is inappropriate for a superior court to increase the penalty applied by a lower court. That is not the function of the superior (appeals) court. The appeals court is to uphold or overturn the conviction--that is all.
Is he the sufferer for Israel's current standing in the world opinion now? Is he a sacrificial lamb? A scapegoat?! OR Has an Arab criminal's life have a worth above that of any other Arab or foreign activist, or 'self-hating' Jew?!
I am sure the incidence of car theft would drop dramatically! Incidentally - are there any figures on the ratio of car thieves by ethnic origin and their proportion in the population? More to the point - is anyone with this knowledge willing to publish it?