• Published 22:23 28.06.10
  • Latest update 22:23 28.06.10

Razing of Palestinian homes in E. Jerusalem approved despite 250 shortfalls in plan

Documents obtained by Haaretz suggest that the plan to raze 22 Palestinian homes in Silwan to make room for tourist center was not ready to be approved by planning committee, but was rushed by Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat.

By Nir Hasson Tags: Israel news East Jerusalem Nir Barkat Palestinians

A controversial plan to raze Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem was approved by the Planning and Building Committee due to pressure by Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat, despite expert opinion suggesting the plan had many flaws, documents obtained by Haaretz exposed on Monday.

According to the documents, the city's professional echelon harshly criticized the plan to raze 22 Palestinian homes to make room for a tourist center in the Silwan neighborhood of East Jerusalem, and decided that the plan is not ready to be put before the committee.

East Jerusalem

The East Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan

Photo by: Emil Salman

Moreover, Jerusalem sources claim that the plan was approved very quickly, which was an unusual move.

The plan calls for razing 22 Palestinian homes that were built without permits and constructing a tourism center in their place which is called Al Bustan in Arabic and Gan Hamelekh (King's Garden ) in Hebrew and is to include restaurants and boutique hotels.

The city said it will help the residents of the 22 homes slated for demolition to move to other areas of Silwan.

Mayor Nir Barkat said last week that he was dismissing city council member and Deputy Mayor Pepe Alalo, for voting against the plan in the Planning and Building Committee. The mayor also announced that he was kicking the other representatives of Meretz out of his municipal coalition as well.

According to the documents Haaretz has obtained, the department which inspects building plans prior to their submission to the planning committee found no less than 250 defects in the Silwan plan.

Moreover, just a week before the plan was approved, Jerusalem city engineer Shlomo Eshkol submitted a list of 30 criticisms of the plan, which included demands for significant changes.

Jerusalem municipality's legal adviser, attorney Yossi Havilio, also found that the plan did not meet legal standards. Because of this, Barkat privately hired lawyer to oversee the plan on behalf of the municipality.

The Jerusalem municipality said in a statement that it sees the Silwan plan as an "opportunity to revamp an area where many construction felonies exist." It also said that "the plan won't be executed before all the criticisms are taken care of, which are mostly technical ones that could be easily fixed."

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 28. 0 0
    it's all politics
    • rm
    • 29.06.10
    • 08:34

    building in East Jerusalem has nothing to do with rationality. It's all about politics. About the ongoing need to create everlasting (Jewish)facts on the ground. For whatever reason Israel keeps preferring building in disputed places over a chance at peace. Sad but true.

  • 27. 0 0
  • 26. 0 0
    This needs to stop Israel
    • AF
    • 29.06.10
    • 07:15

    Have shame.

  • 25. 0 0
    The charade is up. Israel showing it's true colors.
    • Dan
    • 29.06.10
    • 03:45

    I bet the rush to grab as much land as possible is because the support from the average American for Israel is waning. I say most people I know say the US should reconsider it's support for this racist state. In fact, I hear more statements that the US should unilaterally recognize the Palestinian State based on the 67' border. 0

  • 24. 0 0
    Is Jerusalem mayor trying to stop peace talks?
    • Bloodyscot
    • 29.06.10
    • 03:08

    It seem many in Israel are trying to stale or out right stop peace talks along with any peace deal. Granted that Hamas seems to be doing much the same but a lot of pressure is being put on Hamas while little is being put on Israel except for building freeze in which there is record building going on right now.

  • 23. 0 0
    Keeping it Honest
    • Joan
    • 29.06.10
    • 02:35

    I hope the city keeps its word and finds homes for the displaced families.

  • 22. 0 0
    Illegal Const.
    • Me
    • 29.06.10
    • 02:35

    The only illegal construction there, is what's been built.

  • 21. 0 0
    Bravo Meretz and Haaretz
    • bronxite10
    • 29.06.10
    • 02:31

    Meretz, and Haaretz: American Jewish Zionists thank you for preserving a voice of sanity in the wake of the Mayor of Jerusalem's bid to take over Israeli foreign policy. We hope that your efforts will lead to many lawsuits that will stop this flawed and ill timed plan from going forward. I sure hope that if a fund is set up to take donations for such lawsuits, you publish where we can contribute.

  • 20. 0 0
    Is anyone thinking about peace?
    • Yacov
    • 29.06.10
    • 02:31

    I just can't understand! How can a goverment destroy each peace opportunity offered. It's unacceptable for every person who wants peace now!

  • 19. 0 0
    Yet again — the daily, ongoing BS
    • Nate
    • 29.06.10
    • 02:09

    Keep it up Israel, the world is beginning to see your true intentions. Let's all take a step back and give a round of applause for the Internet. If this was 20 years ago, we probably would of never known and this would of gone unnoticed.

  • 18. 0 0
    And we are supposed to "love Israel" unconditionally?
    • Hanna
    • 29.06.10
    • 00:59

    Unless there is a dramatic turnaround in Israel's treatment of the Palestinians, eventually U.S. Jews will start paying attention. At that point "irreconcilable differences" will cause dissolution of the relationship.

  • 17. 0 0
    israel has its W.jerusalem. So,why does it want to grab the Palestinian side?
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 29.06.10
    • 00:45

    Why should Arab East Jerusalem be subject to Israel`s apartheid system with discriminatory use of zoning laws, discrimination in permitting, discrimination in services, discrimination in courts...Arab East Jerusalem must be FREE and part of Palestine.

  • 16. 0 0
    Sacking those that disagree...
    • Welshman
    • 29.06.10
    • 00:39

    I am very surprised that the mayor would be so extreme in his actions because it's good to have criticism sometimes. The thing that worries me is that this plan got the goahead however a few people vote against (who don't affect the outcome btw) and he still goes out to sack them. That ain't democracy, that's a regime!

  • 15. 0 0
    is israel out of law state that doesn´t respect Internationl Laws?
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 29.06.10
    • 00:05

    The annexation of East Jerusalem was declared ILLEGAL by UNSC Resolution 252 (1968)of 21 May 1968 UNSC Resolution 267 (1969) of 3 July 1969 UNSC Resolution 271 (1969) of 15 September 1969, UNSC Resolution 298 (1971) of 25 September 1971, UNSC Resolution 465 (1980) of 1 March 1980, UNSC Resolution 476 (1980) of 30 June 1980 And yet, Israel defies the International Community.

  • 14. 0 0
    Stonewalling by any other word...
    • Gili
    • 29.06.10
    • 00:00

    We can't reach a situation where Israel tears down illegal Jewish construction but turns a blind eye to illegal Arab construction. You can't talk about freezing Jewish construction without simultaneously freezing Arab construction.

  • 13. 0 0
    Israel...the ME's only true democracy...?
    • Richard
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:57

    So Nir Barkat has dismissed his Deputy Mayor and other council members for disagreeing with his plans. Isn't that more of a dictatortutorial practice than a democratic one? And, if the Israeli government allows this to happen and provides their tacit approval for the continued displacement of the Palestinian people, they too are just as guilty. Isn't it also amazing how they can quickly push through demolition orders to raze Palestinian homes, yet for a Palestinian to be granted a building permit, it virtually never happens or takes years for it to go through. This makes me feel absoluetly sick to my stomach.

  • 12. 0 0
    razing of palestinian homes
    • frederick
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:41

    a case of historical inevitability

  • 11. 0 0
    The buildings of Silwan were started in 1882 ....
    • Jasper - Milwaukee
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:32

    ... by Yemen Jews, and there is photographic evidence of the bare hillsides at the time. Arabs drove them out the Jews in the uprisings of the 1930s. The Arab claim is one of bloody conquest. Silwan is questionably part of E. Jerusalem as anyone can see by looking at a map. The rich history of this area by virtue of the water spring and the mention in the Old Testament cries out for something better than a motley assortment of ugly, illegal, and unsafe cement block hovels perched on the hillside.

  • 10. 0 0
    Approved too quickly-Stop promoting beaurocracy!!
    • Yaacov
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:12

    Anything approved in less than 10 or 20 years is too quickly in this country. All there houses should be knocked down they are all illegal. They should all be knocked down in one day. However because it takes ten years to get a permit to build anything including arab homes a compromise was made. Let the city move forward. Mr. Havilio is against any building in east Jerusalem. The whole east Jerusalem looks like a slum why? because the mayors never took control Barakat is doing the right thing. For Jews and Arabs

  • 9. 0 0
  • 8. 0 0
    Barkat
    • arieh zimmerman
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:06

    What can explain this stupidity. It is beyond belief of course, but can it be the mayor is financed, (beyond his millions), by USA extremist right-wing multimillionaires?

  • 7. 0 0
    not surprising
    • not surprised
    • 28.06.10
    • 23:03

    just another illegal land grab. the norm for israelis.

  • 6. 164 0
    any wonder the world knows?
    • Shelley
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:58

    The world has yet another example which tells it that Israel has one overriding objective: land grab not peace deal. Is it defensible? No, but then, Israel seems to love being in defensive mode...forever. How painfully sad.

    • 0 0
      Stop
      • Nadia
      • 29.06.10
      • 00:40

      It's easy fellows. Stop terrorizing Israel. The chaos that this retarded terror campaign is causing create the opportunity for settlers to move in. If you terrorize (aka - make war upon) a country and you lose then you lose the land you formerly squated on. It has worked that way for 1000s of years.

    • 0 0
      Read between the lines
      • "Israel's" objective
      • 29.06.10
      • 02:04

      I wonder what sort of master plan Mr. Barkat is subject to. In case of corruption, I find it unwise to construe into an "objective" of megalomaniac proportions. I mean, where's your logic?

    • 0 0
      They will be Compensated.
      • Elly / Vienna
      • 29.06.10
      • 02:46

      They will be compensated with alternative housing. The Antisemites will always blow it up and not tell the full story.

    • 0 0
      Well of course it does...
      • Mary Hughes-Thompson
      • 29.06.10
      • 02:57

      I mean Israel knows it can do whatever it wants in the guise of "self-defense." But after what happened to our flotilla, the world isn't going to be fooled any longer.

    • 0 0
      RE: any wonder the world knows?
      • Louise
      • 29.06.10
      • 06:59

      yeah it sure is sad that Israel which is about the size of Rhode Island is supposed to keep giving up parts of her nation. that is painfully sad. cause really Israel needs to re-claim all of the land promised by God about 5000 years ago.

  • 5. 0 0
    Not sure
    • Covetous mama
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:56

    Not sure what to say, it seems that the Jews have become idolaters of land - and the covet everything around them. It is amazing what monsters these Israelis have become, even in death, the German Reich creates more and more misery and monsters --truly a legacy only the Reich can be proud of.

  • 4. 142 0
    razing homes
    • Kochav ben Avraham
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:50

    I wonder who pays the kick backs to Nir Barkat

  • 3. 0 0
    Nir Barkat
    • De
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:48

    I keep expecting Barkat to grow a pointy goatee and start wearing an eyepatch. I mean, he's clearly aiming for over-the-top movie villain status at this point.

  • 2. 143 0
    Tourist center
    • guy
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:46

    For a tourist center hey? Well, I officially won't be coming back to Israel.

  • 1. 0 170
    Jerusalem
    • ZAEV1982
    • 28.06.10
    • 22:43

    Thank G-d that we will finally get our garden back. Now that hamas is fading from history maybe we can all live in peace.