• Published 18:13 21.02.10
  • Latest update 19:27 21.02.10

Israel's obstinacy is holding back peace, PA official says

Nabil Sha'ath applauds EU plan to declare Palestinian state within 2 years, apart of Israel-PA talks.

By Haaretz Service Tags: Palestinian Authority Middle East peace Israel news

Member of Fatah's Central Committee Nabil Sha'ath applauded a reported EU initiative to declare a Palestinian state within two years, saying the plan was a result of Israel's stubbornness and it continuing construction in the West Bank, the Palestinian Ma'an news agency reported on Sunday.

Haaretz learned on Saturday that French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner and his Spanish counterpart Miguel Moratinos are promoting an initiative by which the European Union would recognize a Palestinian state in 18 months, before negotiations for a permanent settlement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority are concluded.

According to senior European diplomats and senior Israeli officials, Israel has relayed its opposition to the initiative - warning that it would undermine any chance of a successful peace process.

"We welcome these European declarations, especially those of France, which we consider to have adopted a new attitude amidst the current political stalemate," Sha'ath told Ma'an.

Referring to the current stalemate in peace talks between Israel and Palestinians, Sha'ath said that the standstill was "the result of Israel's stubbornness and ongoing settlement constriction, confiscation of Palestinian land, the Judiazation of Jerusalem, and the daily oppressions and detentions against the Palestinian people."

"Peace would be unobtainable if such Israeli measures continue to undermine all previous agreements and treaties," Sha'ath told Ma'an.

The EU initiative is based on a plan by Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to establish a Palestinian state in two years, which is the time he estimates is needed for the development of state institutions, economic reforms and a completion of the necessary training of Palestinian security forces that would bring law and order to the West Bank.

The Fayyad plan was developed more than six months ago and the Franco-Spanish initiative is meant to bolster it, promising recognition by the European block.

Israel has responded to Kouchner and Moratinos by expressing clear opposition to the initiative, noting it was contrary to the principles of the peace process. "An imposed solution will not achieve the goals," Israel stressed in its message.

"If the European Union will determine the results of the negotiations in advance and promises the Palestinians recognition of a state, they will have no motivation to resume negotiations," the Israeli message states.

"The issue before us at the moment is the building of a reality," Kouchner told the Journal du Dimanche in an interview published yesterday. "France is training Palestinian police, businesses are being created in the West Bank... It follows that one can envision the proclamation soon of a Palestinian state, and its immediate recognition by the international community, even before negotiating its borders."

"If by mid-2011, the political process has not ended the [Israeli] occupation, I would bet that the developed state of Palestinian infrastructure and institutions will be such that the pressure will force Israel to give up its occupation," he added.

France P<: Convene internatioanl peace process

Also on Sunday, French Prime Minister Francois Fillon and his Jordanian counterpart Samir Rifai supported the convening of an international conference that could help achieve progress in the stalled Middle East peace process.

"The two sides welcomed any sincere effort that seeks concerted and constructive action to push forward the peace process, including the possibility of convening an international conference at the appropriate time and in full coordination with all concerned parties," a joint statement said.

Fillon, who arrived in Amman Saturday night for a two-day official visit, also held separate talks with King Abdullah II.

Fillon called for the establishment of "a viable, independent and democratic Palestinian state that lives in peace with Israel and on the basis of the 1967 borders and the relevant UN Security Council resolutions as well as the Arab peace initiative".

"Jordan and France share the same viewpoint and we do believe that there is no other way except that of peace," he said.

The Arab peace initiative offers Israel full recognition by all Arab states if it leaves the Arab territories it occupied in the 1967 Middle East war, including East Jerusalem.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 50. 0 0
    Israel's obstinacy? What a crock !
    • Josiah J. Ben David
    • 23.02.10
    • 01:33

    Israel must first dispose totally of Hamas before any progress can be made. This may mean leveling Gaza but it must be done. Israel will not negotiate on the World's terms. Palestinians are too corrupt, factional, fanatical and violent to presently govern themselves. There will be NO Palestinian government inside of Israel. That should be a blood oath for every Jew ! These Arabs who call themselves by the fictitious name of ' Palestinians' are the scourge of the Earth. Jerusalem is indeed a stone of burden to the nations and it will break many to pieces eventually, yet, Israel continues to be blessed exceedingly and those who fight her cursed !

  • 49. 0 0
    English is Clearly not a Strength for BBS
    • Jon
    • 22.02.10
    • 13:08

    Two quick things 1. Like I said, blame shifting the Pals onto the Palestinian state of Jordan is not pragmatic. In reality, it is already a large Palestinian state, but the JORDANIANS WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PALS. Look up Black September when the Jordanian government massacred tens of thousands of Pals or in 1988 when Jordan completely relinquished the West Bank for a territorial claim. 2. The PLO's diplomatic agreements unfortunately don't segue to the newer PA. The PA does not recognize Israel and it condones acts of martyrdom. Get a grip man! Why is it that you psychologically hate Israel so much, because you clearly don't know enough about the situation to give a well-formed response.

  • 48. 0 0
    BBS been off the air for the last few years? The elected govt of
    • PETER SM
    • 22.02.10
    • 08:02

    Palestine refuses to recognise Israel now or in the future no matter where the borders are.

  • 47. 0 0
    Shimon Peres and 'Palestine is Jordan'...
    • BBSNews
    • 22.02.10
    • 06:43

    ..."President Shimon Peres on Wednesday criticized a rightist lawmaker's suggestion that Jordan should serve as the Palestinian state. National Union MK Aryeh Eldad's proposal that Jordan take responsibility for the Palestinians' welfare is a "baseless hallucination," the president told Israel Radio..." See: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1088591.html - "Peres: 'Jordan is Palestine' plan is baseless hallucination" I hope that clears it up for all you wingnuts forever. It's over. Kaput. No more. It is a "hallucination" to keep bringing it up. And maybe read Haaretz fully before commenting.

  • 46. 0 0
    Irwin Kaplan, the PLO recognized Israel in 1993...
    • BBSNews
    • 22.02.10
    • 06:25

    ...do try and catch up.

  • 45. 0 0
    Long Live Israel
    • charro
    • 22.02.10
    • 06:09

    Every time I read so many atacks against Israel i realize the necessity of Israel to be stronger with a great army. For sure there are not many Jewish fans in the world, could be jealousy, or just simple envy, who knows, but in the mean time LONG LIVE ISRAEL

  • 44. 0 0
    christine and Michael are you married?
    • charro
    • 22.02.10
    • 06:04

    Very soon Christine alias fatima and michael alias mohamed will enjoy going to the mosque, I wonder if Christine will be able to see her way with the burqa, and you Michael with the turban you will cover your bald head, no problem any way is empty. In Mexico we are so happy without moslems you cant imagine, we have narcos, but they are better than any moslem traitor who sided with the nazis in WW11. Michael dont forget about how England won the battle of Tobruk it was with the super help, lives and blood of the Jewish brigade. you in Norway, you are a lost case, Moslems will rule you very shortly.

  • 43. 0 0
    #25 Christine Needs a History Lesson
    • Jon
    • 22.02.10
    • 05:21

    Christine, you clearly need a history lesson. To superficially tell the entire tale would take a minimum of ten pages, but the Six Day War was a defensive war on Israel's part. If you want to oversimplify things and claim that Israel attacked Egypt that is fine, but you are ignoring the complexities of severely threatening Egyptian rhetoric leading up to the war, and Nasser's expulsion of the UNEF, and closure of Tiran. However, while Israel had first directly attacked Egypt, Jordan and Syria both decided to invade Israel of their own volition and poor judgement. The Six Day War was more like 3 separate 2 day wars in reality. During this period Israel gained control of Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Golan. Note: all territories it had captured from Egypt were subsequently returned in 1979 in accordance with Camp David.

  • 42. 0 0
    Shortest peace talks in history.
    • Irwin Kaplan
    • 22.02.10
    • 05:04

    Peace talks begin: Israel: First, do you recognize Israel's right to exist? PA: NO End of peace talks.

  • 41. 0 0
    Lets face it Engorced solutino is the only game in town
    • David
    • 22.02.10
    • 03:01

    Like Mubarak said, Israel will negotiate with you for 16 years over single road block. Liberman says on the one hand peace with the Pals, is unrealitstic, but Ruropean recognition of Pal state will hurt the peace process. Israel is just not an entity to negotiate with, it needs to be presented with a forced solution.

  • 40. 0 0
    Pals State?
    • Marcus
    • 22.02.10
    • 02:51

    what a joke!! israel please stop making up your stupid lies...give back what really never belonged to you...their land and step off.

  • 39. 0 0
    THERE IS NO EU PLAN FOR A 2 YEAR STATEHOOD
    • JEWISHNESS
    • 22.02.10
    • 02:31

    Never was, never will be...JUST THE USUAL USUAL. Beat the chest, applaud the absurd, admonish all good works from Israel (Haiti), and shoot from the lip...just nonsense from a squatter desiring others property.

  • 38. 0 0
    Jon #18
    • Christine
    • 22.02.10
    • 01:57

    "...in a defensive war which very much characterizes the Six Day War on the Jordanian front, however this is not my point. " Another Sionist myth, Jon! That war was provoked by Israel who had thoroughly prepared themselves for it.

  • 37. 0 0
    Arthur # 9
    • Christine
    • 22.02.10
    • 01:48

    Sorry to disappoint you Arthur but I am not Norwegian. I am imported product just like yourself. I am instead a daughter of Charles de Gaulle and Julius Cesar, both experts in colonisation, so I know what I am talking about. Palestinians free in Gaza?? Is that your idea of freedom? How would you like to live with your air space controlled and full of drones, your sea shore blocked, your borders sealed and access to you by the international community constantly denied?

  • 36. 0 0
    Like duh Dude!
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 22.02.10
    • 01:39

    The PA thinks that calling attention to the obvious will change something - anything. The obvious is obvious to all. The current government of Israel, like all since General Rabin was murdered, has had no interest in peace. As no one in Europe or the US will do anything but give lip-service to peace there is absolutely NO chance of peace between the Palestinians and Israel. Best if the whole concept were dropped and serious effort applied for finding a final solution for the Palestinian problem. Who wants them? Who will take them in? If no one wants them, no one will save them, then what?

  • 35. 0 0
    It was Palestinian strategy all along to not negotiate
    • McQueen
    • 22.02.10
    • 00:29

    They have believed all along that the world will impose their conditions on Israel so they have never made a single compromise.

  • 34. 0 0
    BSNews, Peres says, "You don't speak for me."
    • SDHD
    • 22.02.10
    • 00:00

    "Arthur, Shimon Peres says you are hallucinating..." No. He says you're a dishonest, obsessed freak. "...ye olde Jordan is Palestine myth is dead dead dead." Except for the fact that it's roughly 78% of Palestine.

  • 33. 0 0
    BSNews, the hypocrite
    • SDHD
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:58

    " Israel, show the borders Gaza should recognize....come on, let`s see the map." You're one of those clowns who claims that the Palestinian Authority recognized Israel because Arafat wrote a letter, aren't you? Where were the borders?

  • 32. 0 0
    BSNews as full of it as ever
    • SDHD
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:57

    " Jon, they are not "settlements" they`re illegal colonies..." You mean, the communities which were cleansed of Jews by Jordan in 1948 are illegal colonies because the Jews reclaimed their properties 19 years later? You're quite the sick, demented soul, BSNews.

  • 31. 0 0
    Recipy for war
    • X-MILITARY
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:34

    Palestinians will never sign peace agreement with Israel. Their demand for Palestinian state from the river to the sea will continue even after European recognition of a Palestinian state. It will take the Palestinian state no more than 5 years to arm itself to the teeth and a major Middle East War will be launched, only this war will not be limited to the Middle East but will spill out into Europe with grave consequances involved for the European nations.

  • 30. 0 0
    #7 Jon you are a bare faced racist
    • Labhras
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:10

    "Therefore, I support efforts to bolster the Pals with a dose of civilization "Jon this is the kind of bigotted remark we Irish had to endure from your ancestors. Show us how civilised you are Jon---call me a hick or an irish get or some other such civilised name. Civilsed---yeah sure you are.

  • 29. 0 0
    #18 Jon More fantasia from london
    • sarhbal
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:03

    "The Balfour Declaration promised the entire Palestinian Mandate as a National Jewish Homeland so there is clearly no myth."Jon Who got to you Jon---you are suffering from an acute case of "GIGO". The Balfour declaration promised a homelnd but not at the expense of others. Britain as the Mandate changed the borders, as was their right ,when it was obvious too many Jews were arriving and creating an imbalance. It is not the hick from NC who is clueless Jon. Did your english history lesson collide with your Zionist studies. You seem remarkeably weak on British history.

  • 28. 0 0
    #18 Jon More fantasia from london
    • Labhras
    • 21.02.10
    • 23:03

    "The Balfour Declaration promised the entire Palestinian Mandate as a National Jewish Homeland so there is clearly no myth."Jon Who got to you Jon---you are suffering from an acute case of "GIGO". The Balfour declaration promised a homelnd but not at the expense of others. Britain as the Mandate changed the borders, as was their right ,when it was obvious too many Jews were arriving and creating an imbalance. It is not the hick from NC who is clueless Jon. Did your english history lesson collide with your Zionist studies. You seem remarkeably weak on British history.

  • 27. 0 0
    jon in London---do share old chap
    • Labhras
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:54

    "Israeli residence in the West Bank is correctly defined as settlements and an argument can easily be made that they are perfectly legal." Jon They are illegal according to the highest court in Israel as in case # 2056/04 when that court ruled the West Bank (Samaria/Judea---biblical nonsense) toi be held under "Belligerent Occupation" by Israel.Ergo it cannot be sovereign Israeli territory unless you believe a sovereign can Occupy it,s own land. You can make all the arguments you care to--back them up "International law allows for the settlement of land acquired in a defensive war which very much characterizes the Six Day War on the Jordanian front, however this is not my point."Jon Do give us a link to this well hidden secret. here we all are sitiing thinking the Law that covered these events was the one known as "The Inadmissibility of territories gained through war". Gee and you say there is another one. Well here is your chance to share it with all we know nothings.

  • 26. 0 0
    BBSNews, Jordan, Egypt, Israel border is pre-1947 border
    • Dr. L. Brnd
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:38

    Jordan-Israel, Egypt-Israel peace treaties designate the border as between Egypt and Trans-Jordan and colonial Palestine, prior to May 1948 Arab invasion, foreswearing any Egypt, Trans-Jordan claims to land they seized from UK Mandatory Palestine. These treaties, signed by Israel, are borders Israel, the UN, and the world recognize. Arabs of colonial Palestine have no legal standing under the 1947 Partition Plan which they rejected. They also have no legal standing to designate the 1949-1967 Armistice lines as "borders" because those armistice agreements were executed between Israel and Egypt, Trans-Jordan, Syria and Lebanon - NOT them. In fact, they formally rejected the 1967 "borders" in 1968, in Khartoum ("No recognition, no negotiation, no peace"). Too late now. What, the "Palestinians" can reject borders, try to deprive Israel of its rights in those borders for 60 years, and when they finally accept defeat, recover all their lost fortunes at Israeli expense? Ain't gonna happen!

  • 25. 0 0
    try the reverse ! the eu must recognise israels sovereignity
    • vhardman
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:35

    by its binding treaty at san remo in 1920 before it can discuss the mythical palestine !! without recognition of israel and its bordsers it cannot logically find for another state within those borders!

  • 24. 0 0
    Sdhd funny how you always get it wrong
    • Labhras
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:25

    "Funny how Israel accepted the Clinton parameters and the Palestinians rejected them." SDHD No they did not--they had 8 pages of "Exceptions", almost triple those of the Palestinians. Israel has never been interested in peace---it gets in the way of the Greater Israel. "Also funny how Arafat agreed to modify the PA charter, but never did."SDHD Same old same old from the broken record. Funny how netanyahoo has not changed the Likud Charter. ever try posting without insulting people. Is that why you spend all your time on the PC throwing insults at people---cannot make friends, huh SDHD. Sad little man.

  • 23. 0 0
    EU should mind their business
    • Boruch
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:15

    Palestinians are not willing to negotiate any peace now- they would have no point in negotiations if EU adapts this policy.

  • 22. 0 0
    israel has never intended to make peace
    • Labhras
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:10

    Here are comments from their leaders going back to 1936 and right up to today, if you read the Likud Charter. "As it will be demonstrated below, the decision by the Zionist leadership to accept the 1947 proposed UN GA Partition plan was nothing but a smoke screen, which was done solely to gain international recognition and support. This deception was a political ploy to gain initial international legitimacy for the existence of the "Jewish state", and this was well known to the Palestinian people. The reader is urged to contemplate the following Zionist leaders' quotes in an open mind. Note that most, if not all, of the quotes below are dated before the entry of any single Arab Army into British Mandated Palestine: * In a letter Chaim Weizmann sent to the Palestine-British high Commissioner, while the Peel Commission was convening in 1937, he stated: "We shall spread in the whole country in the course of time ..... this is only an arrangement for the next 25 to 30 years." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 66) * Ben-Gurion emphasized that the acceptance of the Peel Commission would not imply static borders for the future "Jewish state". In a letter Ben-Gurion sent to his son in 1937, he wrote: "No Zionist can forgo the smallest portion of the Land Of Israel. [A] Jewish state in part [of Palestine] is not an end, but a beginning ..... Our possession is important not only for itself ... through this we increase our power, and every increase in power facilitates getting hold of the country in its entirety. Establishing a [small] state .... will serve as a very potent lever in our historical effort to redeem the whole country." (Righteous Victims, p. 138) * In 1938, Ben-Gurion made it clear of his support for the "Jewish state" on part of Palestine was only as a stepping ground for a complete conquest. He wrote: "[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong force following the establishment of the state--we will abolish the partition of the country and we will expand to the whole Land of Israel." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 107 & One Palestine Complete, p. 403) * One day after the UN vote to partition Palestine, Menachem Begin, the commander of the Irgun gang and Israel's future Prime Minister between 1977-1983, proclaimed: "The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized .... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever." (Iron Wall p. 25) * ""Shamir has said Israel must keep the territories in order to accommodate the immigrants. "A great aliyah [immigration]," he said, "requires a Greater Israel."(5) He has insisted that, although Soviet Jews are not being directed to the territories, any Jew has the right to live anywhere in the land of Israel, which for most Israelis includes the territories.

  • 21. 0 0
    International law.
    • Brent
    • 21.02.10
    • 22:00

    Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states in paragraph 1, [2] Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive. and states in paragraph 6, The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies. Some here who talk of international law have obviously never bothered to do any research. It is not a matter of debate. It does not matter whether you charactorize a war as "defensive" or offensive. You can not gain territory through war, and you can not move your own population into occupied territory.

  • 20. 0 0
    Shaath? Crook who helped Arafat and Suha embezzle PA aid billions
    • Dr. L. Brnd
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:54

    Guys like Shaath are in favor of anything (like the French-Spanish "proposal") that will derail current negotiation plans and keep the "peace process" going on forever, so the Al-Kidwa clan can keep stealing millions more foreign aid every month. Shaath and the Al-Kidwa's are licking their chops at the prospect of a "unilateral declaration" creating an impoverished, surrounded, cut-off PA pseudo-state, in perpetual conflict with Israel and thus an attractor for more foreign aid money they can steal. Genuine peace would put Shaath and his cronies out of business - the "peace process business" that has made them all wealthy. Reason Hamas has any following at all is that the local population is fed up with PA corruption, of which Shaath is a symbol - kind of like Somoza or Haiti's Baby Doc Duvalier was, only with better tailored suits.

  • 19. 0 0
    #9 Arthur
    • Absolute Dene
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:53

    Nice try of stereotyping there, Arthur. As I presume you know, Quisling was dealt with in proper jusicial manner in 1945, and were swiftly executed thereafter. One should perhaps also note that the Norwegian has had a positive experience with resistance movements, as you may consider mentioning in future talkbacks.

  • 18. 0 0
    Another clueless response by BBSNews
    • Jon
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:37

    Go look at a map of the historical Palestinian mandate and compare it to modern ME boundaries. You will see 78% of it is currently allocated to Jordan. The Balfour Declaration promised the entire Palestinian Mandate as a National Jewish Homeland so there is clearly no myth. It is not pragmatic in today's world to argue that Jordan is enough for the Palestinians, but you are disseminating pure propaganda with your commentary. Get a grip on reality you NC hick!

  • 17. 0 0
    BBSNews is a Waste of Space
    • Jon
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:33

    BBSNews - Your post was completely worthless. Israeli residence in the West Bank is correctly defined as settlements and an argument can easily be made that they are perfectly legal. International law allows for the settlement of land acquired in a defensive war which very much characterizes the Six Day War on the Jordanian front, however this is not my point. Personally, I support the withdrawal of the settlements on ethical groundbut it is not currently a political viable solution. Israel has proven its ability to retract settlements at the appropriate time as it did in 2005, however it is not possible to unilaterally do so without the proper cooperation of Pals. Thanks for embarrassing yourself, and I advise you to actually read and comprehend posts before you comment on them yourself. Like I said, I am purely a Zionists, but also aspire to find solutions that will work out a resolution and equilibrium for both the Pals and Israelis and am excited to see how Fayyad progresses

  • 16. 0 0
    Arthur, Shimon Peres says you are hallucinating...
    • BBSNews
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:25

    ...ye olde Jordan is Palestine myth is dead dead dead. It's a non-starter. Even the President of Israel says so. Now go back to sleep.

  • 15. 0 0
    Israel, show the borders Gaza should recognize...
    • BBSNews
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:23

    ...come on, let's see the map. You see old son, I cannot find an official Israeli map that shows borders. I do know what the internationally recognized borders are, but Israel seems to think it has other borders. So asking the Gazans, the Arab world, or even the wider world of people like me in North Carolina, to "recognize" Israel is quite problematic because there is no map from Israel that declares official and final borders. So what are we all supposed to recognize?

  • 14. 0 0
    BSNews and the usual clueless rant
    • SDHD
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:19

    "That can`t be right! I`m told everyday in these talkbacks ...that the Palestinians don`t want a state, that they will never accept a state." Except, what you're told on these talkbacks is that they have rejected a state every time one has been offered to them. Haven't they, little propagandist?

  • 13. 0 0
    Michael in UK, still a loon
    • SDHD
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:17

    " Israel always negotiates on the basis that the Pals are too weak to extract serious concessions and that the Jewish lobbies in the US and Western states are strong enough to prevent the US or Western states taking any action against Israel whatever it does." Funny how Israel accepted the Clinton parameters and the Palestinians rejected them. Also funny how Arafat agreed to modify the PA charter, but never did.

  • 12. 0 0
    Jon, they are not "settlements" they're illegal colonies...
    • BBSNews
    • 21.02.10
    • 21:15

    ...perhaps that's why you and so many others are confused. You simply type without actually doing some research into the facts, and you've just parroted a very commo lie among Israeli apologists. Israeli colonies are illegal. Israel has illegally transferred a half a million of their citizens onto occupied territory, and this is expressly forbidden under well known international law. This is precisely why every leader around the world, except Bibi of course, calls the colonies illegal. It's because they are illegal. They are a land grab of land that Israel does not and never will hold sovereignty over. Start with UN resolution 181 and work your way forward to 194, 242 and 338. Plus for extra credit look up 465, 478, and 489. Israel believes it is above all laws. It is clearly not. Time's up.

  • 11. 0 0
    That's the spirit!
    • Rob
    • 21.02.10
    • 20:54

    This is great news. It is however important that the Pal's hold off on the rockets and simply expose every encroachment of Pal's soverigntiy. This will allow for EU backing and increased global support. Terror never got anyone anywhere, nor did occupation. Time's up Israel!

  • 10. 0 0
    Pals refuse to negotiate,have a billion Moslems &UNGA on side
    • PETER SM
    • 21.02.10
    • 20:39

    And they cry victim as they sit back waiting for somebody else to do their work for them keeping up the odd murder for good measure. Of course they refuse to be drawn on the "refugee"issue in English but tell millions in Arabic they are going to Israel. They have innumerable lobby groups in the USA & EU which their apologists avoid mentioning,, it spoils a good victim story

  • 9. 0 0
    Christine #1
    • Arthur
    • 21.02.10
    • 20:06

    I wonder what makes an antisemitic daughter of Quisling (you know what was his nationality) to write to a Jewish nespaper? The Pals are free in Jordan where they represent 75% of the whole population AND in Gaza where they are 100% of population! ASK THE 3000 Christians in Gaza how FREE THEY ARE?

  • 8. 0 0
  • 7. 0 0
    European Hope?
    • Jon
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:50

    As a Zionist, I have no problems with these announcement and have put a lot of hope towards Salam Fayyad's institution-building plan. You can blame Israeli negotiating tactics all you would like, but the truth is that the Pals are completely unwilling to negotiate at this point. The larger picture is that diplomatic negotiations are very unlikely to succeed at any point in the near future. Therefore, I support efforts to bolster the Pals with a dose of civilization in hopes that future negotiations are peace are more likely. I believe Obama was hoping to implement policy in this direction, but failed miserably when he mainly focused on the futile issue of settlements.

  • 6. 0 0
    "contrary to the principles of the peace process"
    • Brent
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:49

    The Israeli "principle" of the peace process: Possesion is nine tenths of the law.

  • 5. 0 0
    "noting it was contrary to the principles of the peace process"
    • sh
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:32

    Interesting. What are those principles? Where is the process?

  • 4. 0 0
    That can't be right! I'm told everyday in these talkbacks...
    • BBSNews
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:27

    ...that the Palestinians don't want a state, that they will never accept a state. They tell me that it is only Israel that wants a Palestinians state. Even as the colonies grow and half a million illegal colonists prove the wingnuts liars. As does the above article. As does every Palestinian I speak to. Israelis have a huge problem with facing the truth. The rest of the world has seen through it all now. Well, it wasn't like we didn't warn ya...

  • 3. 0 0
    Problem solved.
    • Walter
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:24

    If a Palestinian state is declared, and passports are issued, it would appear the problem is finally solved. Thank goodness. Will the Palestinians be competing in the Olympics? (Their gold medal in "international justice" from 1972 still stands)

  • 2. 0 0
    Israel almost never negotiates in good faith.
    • Michael
    • 21.02.10
    • 19:20

    Israel always negotiates on the basis that the Pals are too weak to extract serious concessions and that the Jewish lobbies in the US and Western states are strong enough to prevent the US or Western states taking any action against Israel whatever it does.

  • 1. 0 0
    Wonderful news!
    • Christine
    • 21.02.10
    • 18:52

    We, the people of the international community, are eagerly waiting the return of our Palestinian friends to the world community where they belong. At last, the sixty year old age of darkness might come to an end. Free at last! Free at last! Free at last! Keep hope, you people! Your call is finally beginning to be heard.