• Published 16:47 19.12.09
  • Latest update 21:03 19.12.09

Iraq masses troops on Iran border amid oil well row

U.S.: Iraq won't be pushed around by Iran; Iran forces seized Iraqi oil well earlier in the week.

By Associated Press Tags: Israel news

Iraqi troops massed Saturday near an oil well on the border in a standoff with Iranian forces that seized control of the site in a sudden flare up of tension between the two uneasy neighbors.

Iranian forces earlier this week crossed into Iraq, seizing an oil well just over the border in the southern Maysan province. The takeover - which included planting an Iranian flag on the well - was met by protests from Baghdad.

The Iraqi troops and border guards were waiting for further orders at a staging ground about a kilometer from oil well No. 4 at the al-Fakkah oil field, said an Interior Ministry official at the site who was not authorized to talk to the media.

Iraq is not going to be pushed around by Iran, the top U.S. diplomat in Iraq said Saturday following an the Iranian oil well takeover.

U.S. officials said they approved of Iraq's speedy defense of its sovereignty amid ongoing concerns over Iran's influence on its Middle East neighbor.

U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Chris Hill told reporters ,"It does speak to the overall view here that they are not going to be pushed around by Iran."

Iraqi authorities on Saturday prevented media representatives from visiting the area at the al-Fakkah oil field located about 200 miles southeast of Baghdad.

Top Iraqi national security officials said the well was clearly in Iraqi territory and demanded that the Iranians leave immediately.

High-level diplomatic talks between Iraq and Iran are continuing, said Iraqi deputy foreign minister Labid Abbawi.

"The situation this morning is the same: the Iranians have not withdrawn from the well," Abbawi told The Associated Press, "We are still sticking to our position in demanding an immediate withdrawal of Iranian forces from the oil well."

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Rahmin Mehmanparast denied that Tehran had seized the oil well and sought only to reduce tensions between the neighbors, accusing foreign media of spreading false news to disrupt good relations between Tehran and Baghdad.

Diplomatic and technical mechanisms were the way to deal with the issue, said Hasan Kazemi Qomi, the ambassador to Iraq, according to the semiofficial Fars news agency.

Army Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, told reporters that the Iranian forces had withdrawn from the oil well as of Saturday morning. But an oil worker at the field said five Iranians remain inside the well, and the Iranian flag still flew above it.

The worker, who did not want to be identified for fear of retribution, said Iranian troops were watching the well from a hillside on Iran's side of the border.

It was not clear as well what kind of Iranian forces had been at the well. An Iraqi official and an eyewitness described them as soldiers. The Iraqi government spokesman described them only as an armed Iranians.

Earlier Saturday, the top American military official said the oil well takeover appeared to be the latest example of Iran flexing its influence over Iraq and other Mideast nations. However, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen called it an issue for the Iraqi government to settle, and said there were no plans by the United States to intervene.

Once bitter enemies, Iraq and Iran settled into a more positive, if still uneasy, relationship after a Shiite-led government came to power following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

"I continue to worry about the influence of Iran," Mullen, in Iraq for a two-day visit with U.S. and Iraqi authorities, said at a news conference in Baghdad, "I still think it's important that Iran have a constructive, positive influence in this region and globally. And there are just too many examples where that is not the case."

Odierno also said Iran continues to fund and train fighters in Iraq, as well as send weapons and equipment over the border - although less frequently now than in the past.

Analysts said it was too early to say whether the incident would mushroom into greater tension but said it could raise concerns with oil companies looking to invest in Iraq.

Oil prices rose slightly after news of the incident.

Iranian troops near captured oil well.

Photo by: (Reuters)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
    This story is by: Associated Press
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 14. 0 0
    For a Change
    • The Teacher/Instruct
    • 20.12.09
    • 22:48

    IRan/Irak. Wonder who's going to get the upper hand this time !? Israel can sit back & enjoy the fireworks for a change !

  • 13. 0 0
    So Iran is showing its true intentions
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 20.12.09
    • 01:11

    Iran has been funding insurgents, arming them and undermining the Iraqi government for decades and they continue to do so but now acting with more aggression. Iran must be stopped.

  • 12. 0 0
    A message - nothing more
    • Annon
    • 20.12.09
    • 01:01

    This 'incident' is nothing more than a 'message' - to the US much more so than to the Iraqi government. Iran have a habbit of giving little 'messages' to people who threaten them (especially the British who seem to make it easy for them). This is not the first time and won't be the last time. The US understand this and this is why they are not making a fuss about it - the message has been recieved and understood. The response from Iraq is just face saving bluster and should also be understood in the context of regional 'politics'. Nothing will come of this in the short term.

  • 11. 0 0
    Well, well, well.
    • H
    • 19.12.09
    • 21:27

  • 10. 0 0
    Well There's Not Much One Can Say...
    • Yosemite
    • 19.12.09
    • 21:22

    Israel. If I were you, I'd get down to peace talks with the Syrians right now as they have a defense pact with Iran. You don't need a scrap with Syria if it can be avoided considering Syria has a lot of missiles aimed at you. I hope Syria stays out of this because it's pretty clear the Iranians just moved a pawn.

  • 9. 0 0
    Hell, we defended it from Saddam -- we won't lose it to Shell
    • Seyavash
    • 19.12.09
    • 20:54

    I am an anti-Islamic Republic Iranian. But when it comes to defending Iran's territory from becoming wrapped into Iraqi oil auctions, we are all in agreement. A million Iranian's died, 30,000 of them puking banned chemicals as they died, defending this land. We aren't going to lose it to Royal Dutch Shell now.

  • 8. 0 0
    Akram Zekaria _ Good Post. Most Of These Degenerate
    • Eli
    • 19.12.09
    • 20:51

    posters do not know the history and present situation of the Arab world. Egypt-Syria, Syria-Jordan, Syria-Lebanon, Egypt-Yemen, Libya-Egypt, Egypt-Sudan etc. etc. They have always fought and will forever continue to fight. Side by side in hell, as you say. Salamatak akhi.

  • 7. 0 0
    Iran-Iraq - Iraq -Kuwait
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 19.12.09
    • 20:23

    A modal of Mideast neighborhood ! Both are examples of '2-state' living side by side hell !

  • 6. 0 0
    IRAQ CAN'T EVEN FIGHT INSURGENTS
    • Hagee
    • 19.12.09
    • 19:48

    Sure, Iraq is now ready to take on Iran when they can't even defend their own country and depend on the USA to do their fighting for them. . What?? Is the USA going to pour more money into the Iraq army so they can fight Iran???

  • 5. 0 0
    Border Incident, or Excuse for War?
    • Hugh
    • 19.12.09
    • 19:33

    "Iranian forces...crossed into Iraq, seizing an oil well just over the border...Iraqi troops massed...on the border...U.S. officials said they approved of Iraq's speedy defense of its sovereignty." Why does this smell of the 1939 Polish "attack" that provided the excuse for the German invasion? Did the U.S. merely approve of Iraqi "defence", or did they plan this whole exercise? It is out of character for Iran to directly provoke an Iraq bristling with American weapons and troops, especially when additional U.S. troops have been moved to Iran's border with Afghanistan. January was supposed to be the deadline for talks with Iran. The timing of this is just too convenient to be coincidence. Despite what some may think, this will not end well for any of us.

  • 4. 0 0
    This is a little reminder to Obama
    • Natallie Durson
    • 19.12.09
    • 19:19

    If Obama thinks that all options are on the table regarding Irans nuclear program, then perhaps Iran thinks that all options are on the table regarding Iraq. Obama must moderate his threatening words or he will find himself in the midst of an escalating mideast war.

  • 3. 0 0
    A typical neighbourlyhood in the Mideast ...
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 19.12.09
    • 18:07

    One must not forget that both Iraq & Iran are muslim countries. And most Iraqi have the same Shiites Islamic faith as the Iranian. So much of living side by side. Add to that the war between Iraq & Kuwait ! Do any one needs more prove that 2-States will never work ?!

  • 2. 0 0
    This is the peacefull Iran who never started a war in 200 years?
    • dave
    • 19.12.09
    • 17:32

    Iran regime changed before they were peaceful now they re not. Iran before 79 and todays iran is not the same. people who say they vnt stated a war in 200 years from now re right but from 200 years from now iran wasnt ruled by mullahs. Shah of old kingdom and the new kingdom was reasonable. now mullahs re not. i believe iranians re very good people for the sake of their future and good they should get rid of mullahs which they try to do. I pray for the good people(including friends of mine) in iran

  • 1. 0 0
    Iranians should immediatly leave or else !
    • CM
    • 19.12.09
    • 17:23

    Obhama will IMMEDIATLY RUN from Iraq and Afganistan, that will really scare Iran!