• Published 14:08 09.11.09
  • Latest update 14:49 09.11.09

Iran welcomes nuclear talks, but ignores West's offers

Obama has proposed allowing Tehran to send stockpile of enriched uranium to countries including Turkey.

By News Agencies Tags: Iran Israel news

A senior Iranian official has said that Tehran still wants talks with world powers over fuel supplies to its nuclear reactor - despite the country's apparent rejection of a United Nations plan to curb Iran's enriched uranium stockpile.

The New York Times reported on Monday that the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has told Iran it is willing to allow the country to send its stockpile of enriched uranium to any of several nations, including Turkey, for safekeeping.

However, Iran seems to have ignored all of these proposals offered over the last two weeks.

The paper cited a senior Obama administration official as saying that Iran had rejected the proposal on the grounds that keeping nuclear material on its own territory would give it more control over inspections.

A U.S. diplomat said on Monday that Washington was willing to give Iran time to decide whether to accept the UN draft deal that is meant to defuse nuclear tensions with world powers.

The proposal for Iran to part with stocks of potential nuclear explosive material in exchange for fuel to keep a nuclear medicine facility running has stumbled on Iranian calls for amendments, but Iran has not rejected it outright.

Addressing Iran's misgivings over sending low-enriched uranium (LEU) abroad before it receives reactor fuel in return, the UN nuclear agency chief has suggested Iran place the LEU in a friendly third country pending arrival of the fuel.

A senior Iranian official rejected the idea at the weekend.

But Tehran has yet to give a full, official reply on the proposal drafted by International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei three weeks ago after consultations with Iran, France, Russia and the United States.

"There have been communications back and forth. We are in extra innings in these negotiations. That's sometimes the way these things go," said Glyn Davies, U.S. ambassador to the IAEA.

"We want to give some space to Iran to work through this. It's a tough issue for them, quite obviously, and we're hoping for an early positive answer from the Iranians."

"Iran has the opportunity to embrace this deal, and it's a very good, very positive...and fair deal. It would do much to move this process forward," Davies said in Vienna.

"When the reactor's fuel run out next year, we would help to keep it going. There are hospitals, doctors, cancer patients who rely on the material produced there. We know the leadership in Tehran needs to keep the reactor going. We would like to help with that effort," he said.

Iranwelcomes nuclear talks

Meanwhile, Iranian top nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, said late Sunday that Tehran welcomes talks on the nuclear issue with the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany. Jalili spoke during a meeting with visiting Russian deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, according to Iran's state television.

Russia is part of the UN effort to ensure Iran doesn't use its nuclear program for weapons-making purposes, as the West fears. Moscow has warned it could back new sanctions against Iran if it fails to take a constructive stance in the nuclear talks.

A UN-brokered plan in October required Tehran to send 1.2 tons (1,100 kilograms) - around 70 percent of its stockpile - of low-enriched uranium to Russia in one batch by the end of the year for further enrichment, a move that would ease international concerns the material could be processed for a bomb.

According to the UN plan, after further enrichment in Russia, France would convert the uranium into fuel rods that would be returned to Iran for use in a reactor in Tehran that produces medical isotopes. Fuel rods cannot be further enriched into weapons-grade material.

Iran, which says its nuclear work is peaceful, has not yet given a final response to the UN proposal, and has come up instead with its own request to buy nuclear fuel from abroad. Iranian officials and lawmakers have hardened their stance toward the UN plan in recent comments, adding to the pressure on the government to altogether reject the draft.

In addition, Teheran has indicated it may agree to send only part of its stockpile in several shipments abroad and has threatened to - should the talks with world powers fail to help Iran obtain the fuel from abroad - enrich uranium to the higher level needed to power the research reactor domestically.

The back-and-forth has left the nuclear talks in limbo.

On his visit to Tehran, Ryabkov expressed hope the talks would be concluded soon.

Tehran still welcomes the talks based on its package of proposals, Jalili said, referring to the Iranian counteroffer.

The United States and its allies are unlikely to accept anything substantially less than the original U.N. plan.

But an American envoy at the UN nuclear watchdog agency in Vienna said the West is prepared to wait for a definitive Iranian response.

Tehran needs time - it has it, and we are hoping for a positive answer, said Glynn Davies, the chief U.S. delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

We hope Tehran seizes this opportunity and finds a better way forward into the future, Davies added.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 10. 0 0
    Tony Silver
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 09.11.09
    • 21:14

    "Iran has not signed the Addional Protocol, so it is in its right not to abide with that." - Tony Silver Actually Iran did sign the Additional Protocols in December 2003 and was compliant until the Bush administration and Israel began talking of attacking it. At that time Iran withdrew from the Additional Protocols because they permitted snap inspections of ANY place in Iran. The man who signed the Additional Protocol was Ali Akbar Salehi, the current head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. The world is not going to settle for less than Iran returning to the Additional Protocols and full compliance. Any attempt to justify Iranian obtuseness by comparison to Israel is specious. There is no 'double standard' involved. Iran tried to get into enrichment on the cheap by purchasing black market used centrifuges from Pakistan and got caught. It violated the NPT. It must FULLY comply with the NPT and return to the Additional Protocols if it wants to have the sanctions removed.

  • 9. 0 0
    4~ Persian Kitty
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 09.11.09
    • 20:07

    Iran under the yoke of the Mullahs deserve no respect. It is not only me who is saying that but those who protested in the streets of Tahran only few months ago & some of them tragically lost their lives & many of them were sent to jail. Having said all that; I must appologies to you humbly & shamefully for not saying 'the government of Iran' in my post. May I also add, Iran was a country specially loved by the Iraqi Jews like me for giving many of them all the facilities to leave Iraq in their way to Israel just when the Jewish State was established after 1948. Regards.

  • 8. 0 0
    Double Standrds..!!
    • Tony Silver
    • 09.11.09
    • 20:04

    Iran has not signed the Addional Protocol, so it is in its right not to abide with that. By a similar logic, Israel has not signed the NPT, so they are allowed to have nuclear weapons. You can't have it both ways. If Israel is not bound by treaties it did not sign, neither is Iran.

  • 7. 0 0
    Meanwhile, in the real world
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 09.11.09
    • 19:58

    Iran has been trying to purchase fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor for a year now, and it is amusing to watch Iran be refused by one after another of the nations that produce 19.75% enriched fuel. First was Argentina, who supplied the current batch of fuel. Argentina rebuffed them. A small problem about a terrorist attack in Argentina. A bit of evil which has backfired big. Then Russia, and now China have refused. Such mundane nuts and bolts of the real situation don't get much coverage, but it's out there if you look.

  • 6. 0 0
    How long do you think it will take Persian Kitty
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 09.11.09
    • 19:22

    The technocrats of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization are desperate to refuel the Tehran Research Reactor and are eager to swap the fuel for the as yet not completed Bushehr reactor for fuel for the TRR. The idiotocracy running Iran seems to think it can play games and still have the isotopes that industry and medicine require. Given the current political paralyzation of the government, what is your guess as to how long before the Ayatollahs get it through their medieval skulls that physics is not subject to prayer and fasting.

  • 5. 0 0
    Barry Zornberg in New Yak
    • Lou Medel
    • 09.11.09
    • 19:01

    You're a zionist. Iran isn't building a bomb. Understand that. Iran is building a nuclear capability that is peaceful. For now. It will also possess the knowledge to build a bomb in the future should the necessity arise. What is this necessity? Any country that attacks Iran "preemptively" will be the actuator. Any country will defend itself if attacked first. Israel is really very excellent in this department. It ALWAYS attacks first. '67 included. Salaam/Shalom

  • 4. 0 0
    Akrram Zekaria
    • Persian Kitty
    • 09.11.09
    • 18:29

    Please give my compliments to your mother for having raised such a gracious and articulate lady.

  • 3. 0 0
    Iran is the lairs den !
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 09.11.09
    • 16:55

    "Iran welcomes nuclear BUT ignores West's offers" Ed Welcomes ?! How it is 'welcomed' when it is ignored ! Under the Mullahs, Iran is a lairs den and can't be trusted. Time the West to tell that to Iran & to its own lieing face ! Unless the world will treat the Islamic Republic like a shit; nothing good will come from any talk with Iran. Only action makes sense with present day Iran.

  • 2. 0 0
    Please be patient
    • Annon
    • 09.11.09
    • 16:42

    To the Iranians the nuclear issue is highly polically charged, difficult, and not particularly in thier interests. Asking them to part with their Uranium for next to nothing in return is like asking Israel to demolish thier settlements. Neither of these things are likely to happen - so negotions will continue until all parties recieve tangible benefits or at least an agreed compromise. It may not look like progress is being made with Iran, but considerable progress has indeed been made - in fact just getting them to stay at the table, never mind make genuine counter proposals, is evidence of that. An issue like this will not be solved quickly, but it will be solved. Give it time.

  • 1. 0 0
    Iran Shocker!
    • Barry Zornberg
    • 09.11.09
    • 14:22

    Wow! What an incredible shock that the peace-loving folks in Iran have yet again rejected any nuclear proposals made! This time, they bought only another 8 months!!! By my calculation, they only need 1 or 2 more of these stalling tactics until their bomb is ready. Will the world never learn? This is Barry Zornberg making yet another observation of what we all know to be true.