• Published 07:12 18.09.09
  • Latest update 11:50 18.09.09

Iran President: We have no need for nuclear weapons

IAEA: Tehran can make a nuclear bomb and is working toward a compatible missile system.

By Reuters and AP Tags: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Iran IAEA Israel news

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Thursday that Iran had no use for nuclear weapons, adding that the Islamic Republic would "never" abandon its disputed nuclear program to appease Western critics.

In an NBC-TV interview, the Iranian leader also did not offer a direct response when asked whether there were any conditions under which Iran would develop a nuclear weapon.

"We don't need nuclear weapons," Ahmadinejad said, speaking through an interpreter.

"We do not see any need for such weapons. And the conditions around the world are moving to favor our ideas," Ahmadinejad added.

Iran has repeatedly said it is enriching uranium only to generate electricity, not for fissile bomb material, although it has no nuclear power plants to use low-level enriched uranium.

Ahmadinejad said Iran would "never" halt work on its nuclear program to mollify Western skeptics.

Iran is set to attend talks on Oct. 1 with major powers worried about its nuclear strategy. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said this week any talks with Iran would have to address the nuclear issue.

"We have always believed in talking, in negotiating, that's our logic. "Nothing has changed," Ahmadinejad said, speaking through an interpreter.

"If you are talking about the enrichment of uranium for peaceful purposes, this will never be closed down here in Iran," he said.

The P-5 plus 1 (the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia and Germany) is concerned that Iran's nuclear enrichment program is aimed at producing a nuclear weapon.

Secret IAEA document: Iran has ability to make atom bomb

On Thursday, a secret report revealed that experts belonging to the United Nations nuclear watchdog organization said they were in agreement that Tehran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is on the way to developing a missile system capable of carrying an atomic warhead, according to a secret report.

The document, drafted by senior officials at the International Atomic Energy Agency, was the clearest indication yet that the agency's leaders share Washington's views on Iran's weapon-making capabilities.

It appeared to be the so-called secret annex on Iran's nuclear program that Washington says is being withheld by the IAEA's chief.

The document says Iran has sufficient information to build a bomb. It says Iran is likely to overcome problems on developing a delivery system.

This report comes just as U.S. President Barack Obama announced on Thursday that his administration has scrapped Bush administration plans to deploy a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic to combat the Iranian threat.

The IAEA, however, later denied the report, saying that it had no proof that Iran has or once had a covert atomic bomb program. In a statement, the organization reaffirmed former IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei's Sept. 9 warning that allegations the agency was sitting on undeniable evidence of Iranian bomb work were "politically motivated and baseless."

"With respect to a recent media report, the IAEA reiterates that it has no concrete proof that there is or has been a nuclear weapons program in Iran," the statement said.

Meanwhile Thursday, IAEA member states agreed to call for a Middle East free of nuclear arms, with more countries supporting the resolution than last year.

At the IAEA's annual general conference, 103 countries voted in favor, none against. Only four abstained - including the United States and Israel. Last year, 13 countries abstained on a similar resolution.

Consensus on the resolution was reached only after an indirect reference to Iran and Syria was included in Egypt's draft text.

A deal was reached in discussions in the last days involving Egypt, Israel, Sweden - holding the current European Union presidency - and the United States, according to diplomats.

Alluding to Iran and Syria, the final text of the adopted resolution called on all states in the Middle East to "to cooperate fully with the IAEA within the framework of their respective obligations."

The IAEA said in a recent report that it has made no headway in confirming whether Iran conducted research related to nuclear weapons in the past.

The Vienna-based nuclear agency has also been trying in vain to get more access to Syria, in order to verify whether a site bombed by Israel in 2007 was indeed a secret nuclear reactor under construction.

"We are very pleased with the agreed approach reflected here today in the discussions that we've had on this issue this week," U.S. ambassador Glyn Davies said.

Iran nuclear envoy: Talks with West are a new window of opportunity

The Iranian ambassador to the UN nuclear watchdog agency said on Thursday that Iran believes next month's talks with major powers worried about its nuclear strategy represents a real opportunity,

"This is a real, new window of opportunity that is being opened by the Iranian nation," Ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh told The Washington Post in an interview published on its website late on Thursday.

"They should immediately and promptly seize this opportunity."

Soltanieh repeated Iran's position that it would not agree to use the Oct. 1 meeting with the United States and other major powers to negotiate away its right to a nuclear program.

He said the meeting should be a forum for a broad exchange of views.

"When you sit down at a negotiating table without preconditions, with mutual respect, the rules of the game are that everyone has a right to raise anything. No one can restrict the other to express themselves," he said.

The international group, known as the P-5 plus 1, is made up of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council - Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States - as well as Germany.

The meeting is a move toward President Barack Obama's pledge during the campaign last year to try to improve relations with Tehran through more direct contacts. The two countries have not had diplomatic ties since 1980.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said this week any talks with Iran would have to address the nuclear issue. The United States and other major powers are concerned the nuclear enrichment program is aimed at producing a nuclear weapon, but Iran says it is for producing nuclear energy.

Soltanieh, who represents Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Tehran would not respond well to a dual "carrot-and-stick" approach offering a choice between dialogue or sanctions, which he called humiliating.

"If you tell me 'You must,' I say 'no.' If you say 'please,' the answer might be 'yes' or 'maybe,'" he said.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 19. 0 0
    do you belive him?
    • Eli
    • 19.11.09
    • 05:40

    do you believe him?

  • 18. 0 0
    Persian Kitty-#16-Antisemitic scapegoat-ism
    • Daniel Leopold
    • 19.09.09
    • 06:04

    Some Iranian women and some elites in Iran seem to understand that the cheap and nasty propaganda disseminated by Ahmadinajad is nothing else but antisemitic scapegoat-ism meant to cover up the activities of their criminal rulers and their allies. Most though seem to fall for it and until this regime is not toppled we will all have to deal with a ticking TIME BOMB which may yet turn into a NUCLEAR BOMB on top of a balistic missile aimed at Israel

  • 17. 0 0
    they WANT nuclear weapons
    • Jason
    • 19.09.09
    • 01:06

    Israel on the other hand needs the nukes.

  • 16. 0 0
    Julie
    • Persian Kitty
    • 18.09.09
    • 21:50

    You obviously don't know anything about Iranian women. In case you have a moment to catch the opposition movement in Iran, do so to realize that the women are at the forefront of the movement. Observing them puts me (a top 2% highly educated and achieved American woman) to shame.

  • 15. 0 0
    Humiliating?
    • julie
    • 18.09.09
    • 20:01

    Humiliating is what I would have to endure as a women in Iran. It cheapens all valid arguments you have against Israel and the U.S.

  • 14. 0 0
    #7, Israel plays along with Iran on this issue.
    • Mark
    • 18.09.09
    • 17:18

    We know Israel and the US do business with Iran. Iran-Contra. Who benefits from these threats? Oil companies,Iran Israeli leaders have to go along with this lie.

  • 13. 0 0
    12
    • zionist forever
    • 18.09.09
    • 16:04

    They are not even playing deception. All western government know Iran is developing nukes and have been for years but Iran saying we don't need or want nukes is just telling them what they want to hear so they can say we can use diplomacy and there is no need for military action. With wars in Iraq & Afghanistan the west doesn't have the stomach to attack another country even if we are talking about air strikes only and no troops on the ground. If the other wars were not going on especially Iraq I think the US & some of its allied would be in favour of air strikes. Instead we have been going round in circles negotiating for over 4 years now. Talks & sanctions makes these governments look like they are doing something even if politicians know its not going to change Iranian policy. Obama is happy for things to continue to go around in circles indefaintly because once it gets beyond the point of no return he can formally say military action isn't an option.

  • 12. 0 0
    Ahmedinejad's Taqiyyah
    • Brod
    • 18.09.09
    • 13:23

    They are using their Taqiyyah (Deception) tactic to fool the world. In reality, they are feverishly working on their nukes. Israel and the world must not be fooled by their trickery.

  • 11. 0 0
    iran
    • OZ
    • 18.09.09
    • 12:07

    We have always believed in talking,that's our logic.He admitts that they are only prepare to talk,but still do whatever they wish.Lets talk,but don't expect any agreement,Iranian logic! Logic is the art of going wrong with confidence.

  • 10. 0 0
    Iran needs nukes but not for defense.
    • zionist forever
    • 18.09.09
    • 12:02

    Iran has no military need for nukes for defensive purposes. The real need for nukes is prestige & bully boy tactics. Iran wants to be the new Middle East superpower and a global military power which is why they are investing billions in both conventional & non conventional weapons. With a strong conventional army Iran can be a threat to its naighbors and just have a strong conventional military but that doesn't give you superpower status & it doesn't earn respect globally. Also if Iran has nukes along with a strong conventional army it will be in a good position to bully the other Gulf states which the arabs are worried about and they can of course use them against Israel if the supreme ayatollah gets a message from Allah saying nuke the zionists. Iran must not be allowed to get nukes under any circumstances.

  • 9. 0 0
    set ablaze Iran's oil fields
    • Baruch Gold
    • 18.09.09
    • 12:02

    Won't this weaken Hizbollah, give incentives to make new alternative energies and prevent Iran from acquiring nukes. It's a win/win and there are alternative oil sources that can make up for Iran's. Let us not all wait for fanatic shiites to get nuclear weapons that can reach Europe, Russia, Israel, Egypt and India. We need not a nuclear holocaust thank you very much!

  • 8. 0 0
    No Iranians need Radiation suits
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 18.09.09
    • 11:58

    I envision many glow in the dark Persians at this rate...

  • 7. 0 0
    Iranians make all this to rise the price of oil
    • dani.a
    • 18.09.09
    • 11:41

    Everyone knows that Israel is a vibrant democracy of kind that no one have seen before but she makes the play for ran speaking of bombing the nuclear sites or speaking about the boycott of Iranian oil.All these cause the price of oil to goes up and that is in the Iran interest.

  • 6. 0 0
    We don't need nuclear weapons
    • Ralph
    • 18.09.09
    • 11:07

    Right, you need stick !

  • 5. 0 0
    The complex situation, no answers.
    • Stephen.
    • 18.09.09
    • 11:06

    The P5 plus 1 are already divided. China,Russia and possibly Germany. They have no intention of allowing sanctions, The US,UK and France believe halfheartedly in sanctions that cannot even work. Here comes the complexity, Russia wants to US out of Georgia and Ukraine. Whilst the US is bogged down in the ME, Russia is smiling. Russia can send food or gasoline to Iran via its railroad system. Germany wont dare face off with Russia. China has its own agenda. Now, Mr.Obama is seen as a weak an unexperienced president. The Cuban missile crises does come to mind. Neither side believed what the other would do. The odd man out is PM Netanyahu. He went to Moscow with proof and was probably turned down. Israel would need far more cooperation from Washington before the Iranians begin to throw mines all over the Gulf of Hormuz. Basically, the answers do not lie in diplomacy, for Iran has no intention of ceding one iota.

  • 4. 0 0
  • 3. 0 0
    Why not lie ?
    • Nora Tel Aviv
    • 18.09.09
    • 10:05

    Ahmadinejad is an extreme Shii fundamewntalist, ready to sacrifice half of Iran for their beleif. If they are ready to die, why in earth will they not be ready to lie ?

  • 2. 0 0
    For how long has every nuclear power said the same?
    • English Resident
    • 18.09.09
    • 08:12

    But they don't give up, do they? What's the excuse each offers for retention and development? Unless of course they claim not to be involved with nuclear capability? I believe that's still the official claim of the self-styled sole democracy in the Middle East

  • 1. 0 0
    Iranians lie
    • peter rouget
    • 18.09.09
    • 07:39

    Iran could have procured peaceful nuclear plants at bargain prices. There was no need to develop the whole infrastructure and Uranium refining technology on their except for their quest for weapons and power. So their so called peaceful intentions is a blatant lie. Spending billions of dollars on what they could have gotten almost for free, they have ignored the time bomb ticking within their own society. Their quest to manipulate Arab politics has let them overlook the needs of their own people whom they suppress with medieveal fundamentalism. The recent riots were nothing. Iran will explode itself.