Iran hints at acceptance of nuclear deal with West
Iranian foreign minister says Iran could send part of its low-enriched uranium stockpile abroad.
By Reuters Tags: US Israel news Iran nuclearIran's foreign minister said on Monday the Islamic Republic could endorse a United Nations-brokered deal for it to send potential nuclear fuel abroad for processing, contradicting lawmakers who rejected the plan as a trap.
The remark by Manouchehr Mottaki was the most positive yet from a senior Iranian official and hinted at fierce backroom debate between hardliners and moderates in the faction-ridden Iranian leadership on whether to accept the deal.
UN inspectors, meanwhile, examined on Monday a hitherto secret uranium enrichment site bunkered inside a mountain to verify Tehran's stance that the plant was meant to make only low-enriched fuel for electricity, not the high-purity version for nuclear arms.
Understandings on the fuel plan and outside access to the enrichment plant under construction were struck at high-level Geneva talks between Iran and six world powers on Oct. 1.
They see the deals as litmus tests of Iran's stated intent to use enriched uranium only for peaceful ends, and a basis for more ambitious negotiations on curbing enrichment in Iran to defuse a crisis over its disputed nuclear aspirations.
Mottaki said Iran could either send part of its low-enriched uranium (LEU) stockpile abroad for specialized processing into fuel for a Tehran nuclear medicine facility that is running out of it, or buy the material from foreign suppliers.
"In order to obtain this fuel, we might spend money as in the past or we might present part of the fuel that we have right now, and currently do not need, for further processing," he was quoted by the official news agency IRNA as saying.
He said the Islamic Republic would announce its decision "in the next few days". Iran missed a Friday deadline set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief for giving a reply to the proposal he hammered out in consultations with Iran, Russia, France and the United States in Vienna last week.
Prominent lawmakers have said since then that Iran should not send out any of its LEU reserve, suggesting it was a strategic asset Tehran could not afford to relinquish while facing Western pressure to shelve enrichment entirely.
But some officials have privately suggested Iran in the end is likely to accept the deal, although it remained unclear how much LEU Tehran would agree to shift abroad, and when.
One Tehran analyst, who declined to be named, said the outcry over the draft would allow Iran to present its eventual acceptance as a major concession in the hope this would deflate pressure on it to shelve enrichment, a step it rules out.
The draft pact calls for Iran to transfer some 80 percent of its known 1.5 tonnes of LEU to Russia for further enrichment by the end of this year, then to France for conversion into fuel plates. These would be returned to Tehran to fuel a research reactor that produces radio-isotopes for cancer treatment.
The U.S. role would be upgrading the reactor's safety and instrumentation, Iran's envoy to the U.N. watchdog said.
For the powers, the deal's value lies in delaying Iran's potential to derive a bomb from its LEU stocks, now enough to yield one weapon. If 80 percent were removed, Iran would need about a year to replenish it at its current rate of output.
Western diplomats say the notion of Iran importing foreign fuel is a non-starter, and a delaying tactic if Tehran pursues it, since UN sanctions ban trade with Iran in nuclear goods that could be "weaponized", such as enriched uranium.
Iran is years away from having any civilian nuclear power plants to run with LEU it is rapidly amassing, raising Western suspicions about the underlying goal of its enrichment campaign.
Western power diplomats say Iran was forced into revealing its second enrichment site near Qom to the IAEA a month ago because their intelligence agencies had already detected it.
The inspectors aimed to compare engineering designs to be provided by Iran with the actual look of the facility, interview scientists and other employees, and take soil samples to check for traces of activity of a military nuclear nature.
Iranian opposition exiles blew the whistle on Iran's first enrichment plant, at Natanz, in 2002. It has since expanded to industrial scale but is now under daily IAEA surveillance.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
What will be Israel's next fabricated existential threat?
Good on Iran-She must get her priorities right?
"Iran is years away from having any civilian nuclear power plants to run with LEU it is rapidly amassing, raising Western suspicions about the underlying goal of its enrichment campaign." funny, russia has almost if not completed a nuclear reactor, i know that 100%, yet this articel states they don't have one.
To Durson, why do you lie. You do not live in LA. Do you want to seem American while living elsewhere?
Iran using the proposal to weaken the nerves of the West. Yes, No, Maybe, Tomorrow, How about, Whatsup, ..................................!!! Truth is Iran wants to buy time and then blow up Israel. Netanyahu knows that but has to wrestle with Goldstone and Obama. Abbas is further complicating things with an election in January.
These are the lines along which Iran plays the game. Iran will give enough LEU so Obama can claim some success, but keep it an ounce short of claiming total success. At which point, the pressure will multiply on Obama to get something out of Israel. And given that Israel can afford to concede nothing, the wedge will go deeper between US and Israel, with all its obvious consequences.
HMohammed signed peace agreements with other Arabian tribes, among them a Jewish one, and bided his time until he was strong enough to successfully attack and exterminate them, men, women and children. The Irfanians are good students of the History of Islam. I hope we are not the Bani Qurayza.
Israel has long been successful at getting what they wanted by making promises and committments and then, later, reneging on their part. Thisis come to be common behavior from Israel and was tolerated by the world as the best they could expect from Israel. Now, Israelis see Iran infringing on their common practice and they are furious. Those long term Israel watchers can only smile and consider the veracity of a hundred different parables which describe Israels situation.