• Published 04:10 11.02.10
  • Latest update 17:04 11.02.10

Iran clamps down on opposition rally as thousands mark Islamic revolution in Tehran

Reform supporters report sharp drop in internet, mobile service and Google disruptions ahead of central rally.

By News Agencies Tags: Israel news Iran nuclear

Hundreds of thousands of Iranians massed Thursday in central Tehran to mark the anniversary of the revolution that created the country's Islamic republic, while a heavy security force fanned out across the city and moved quickly to snuff out opposition counter-protests.

Police clashed with protesters in several sites around Tehran, firing tear gas to disperse them and paintballs to mark them for arrest. Dozens of hard-liners with batons and pepper spray attacked the convoy of a senior opposition leader, Mahdi Karroubi, smashing his car windows and forcing him to turn back as he tried to join the protests, his son Hossein Karroubi told The Associated Press.

The celebrations marking the revolution's 31st anniversary were an opportunity for Iran's clerical regime to tout its power in the face of the opposition movement, which has managed to keep up periodic street protests since the disputed June presidential elections despite a fierce crackdown.

The opposition turnout was dwarfed by the huge crowd at the state-run celebrations. Many were bused in to central Azadi, or Freedom, Square to hear an address by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who proclaimed a new success in Iran's uranium enrichment program and dismissed new U.S. sanctions.

And the massive security clampdown appeared to succeed in preventing protesters from converging into a cohesive demonstrations. Large numbers of riot police, members of the Revolutionary Guard and Basij militiamen, some on motorcycles, deployed in back streets near key squares and major avenues in the capital to move against protesters.

Opposition Web sites spoke of groups of protesters in the hundreds, compared to much larger crowds in past demonstrations

One protester told The Associated Press she had tried to join the demonstrations but soon left in disappointment. "There were 300 of us, maximum 500. Against 10,000 people," she told an AP reporter outside Iran. She said there were few clashes.

"It means they won and we lost. They defeated us. They were able to gather so many people," she said. "But this doesn't mean we have been defeated for good. It's a defeat for now, today. We need time to regroup."

Another protester insisted the "opposition had come out in significant numbers, but the problem was that we were not able to gather in one place because they [security forces] were very violent."

"Maybe people got scared," he said. "The idea wasn't to lose or win today ... But what is certain, today was not a good day."

Both spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation by authorities, who have jailed protesters for talking to foreign media.

Authorities banned foreign media in Iran from covering the pro-reform protests. Tehran residents also reported Internet speeds dropping dramatically and e-mail services such as Gmail being blocked in a common government tactic to foil opposition attempts to organize.

Thousands upon thousands marched along the city's broad avenues toward Azadi Square to celebrate the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, according to footage on state TV. There, the massive crowds waved Iranian flags and carried pictures of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic state, and his successor as supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

State buses ferried many to the square. State media touted the turnout as a show of support for the government - though to an extent, celebrations for the revolution cross partisan lines, and many Iranians who oppose Ahmadinejad but support the clerical leadership turn out annually. Among those attending was influential former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, an opposition supporter.

For days ahead of the anniversary celebrations, anti-government Web sites and blogs have called for a major turnout in counter-protests and urged marches to display green emblems or clothes, the opposition's signature color.

Security forces fired tear gas to disperse a group of protesters who were trying to march toward Azadi Square as they chanted death to the dictator, the opposition Web site Kaleme said, reporting an unknown number of arrests. Police and Basijis on motorbikes swept toward central Tehran, where protesters and security forces clashed in several locations, it reported.

Riot police fired paint-filled balls at hundreds of protesters chanting opposition slogans in Sadeqieh Square, about a half-mile (one kilometer) from the anniversary rally, witnesses said.

Security forces also briefly detained Khomeini's granddaughter and her husband, who are both senior pro-reform politicians, according to the couple's son, Ali.

The granddaughter, Zahra Eshraghi, and her husband Mohammad Reza Khatami, who is the brother of a former pro-reform president, were held for less than an hour before being released, their son told the AP.

The witnesses spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution from authorities. Foreign media were allowed to cover the ceremonies in the square, including Ahmadinejad's speech, but there is a ban on covering opposition protests.

Iranian authorities again tried to squeeze off text messaging and Web links in attempts to cripple protest organizers. Internet service was sharply slowed, mobile phone service widely cut and there were repeated disruptions in popular instant messaging services such as Google chat.

Many Internet users said they could not log into their Gmail account, Google Inc.'s e-mail service, since last week.

The opposition claims that Ahmadinejad's victory in the June 12 election was fraudulent and that the true winner was pro-reform leader Mir Hossein Mousavi. Hundreds of thousands marched in the streets against the government in the weeks after the vote, prompting a massive wave of arrests.

Nevertheless, the opposition has succeeded in continuing to hold regular protests, often timing them to coincide with days of important political or religious significance in attempts to embarrass authorities. The tone of the rallies has shifted from outrage over Ahmadinejad's re-election to wider calls against the entire Islamic system, including Khamenei.

Tensions have mounted further since the last large-scale marches, in late December, which brought the most violent battles with security riots in months. At least eight people were killed in clashes between protesters and police, and security forces have intensified arrests in the weeks since.

In January, two people who were put on trial alongside opposition politicians and protesters were executed for allegedly plotting to overthrow the state. Authorities have announced that 10 other opposition supporters have also been sentenced to death - a move many believe was aimed at intimidating protesters.

Iran protests marking anniversary to revolution.

Photo by: (Reuters)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 23. 0 0
    We are friends of all you neighbors
    • Iranian
    • 13.02.10
    • 18:28

    The green movement is a visible movement, trying to realise the suppressed dreams of Iranians, as a people who love freedom, peace and progress. We greens, we love all our neighbors and all the people who seek democracy and freedom, may all our voices from within and without become one that would one day acually bring about the change we all need i n Iran and all over the Middle East. Much love from Iran for all you who care

  • 22. 0 0
    Mark from Amsterdam
    • dave
    • 11.02.10
    • 18:57

    Iran wont be a friend of israel when mullahs fall. but hopefully a democratic and modern state it will be. and its easier to talk with democratic states and resolve the problems thats why Europe chose decades before to be democracy instead of monarchy and between secular democracies fundamentalist war reasons doesnt exists there is only interest... and im sure a ''Peoples Iran'' will stop the support to groups like hizb and hamas and will be against them...

  • 21. 0 0
    Eric
    • Persian Kitty
    • 11.02.10
    • 18:10

    "the dread is knowing that many will pay a heavy price...: Eric And the beauty is that not even the heavy price stops my Lion and Lioness brothers and sisters.

  • 20. 0 0
    I wonder why people are so sure that when the mullah regime falls
    • Mark B.
    • 11.02.10
    • 17:36

    Iran's foreign policy will make a 180 degree turn, Iran will stop developing nukes and become a friend of Israel and the West as in the good old days of the Shah? I wouldn't bet on it. There are even people who count on Islam to fall and Zoroaster to rise once again. Iran has very rational reasons to deswire a nuclear deterrent and that will not change if the opposition prevails.

  • 19. 0 0
    I have two persian kitties
    • Jose Pedro
    • 11.02.10
    • 16:31

    Said and Lateefa. I'm glad to see iranians fighting for their freedom as never. Dictartoship is proved once again, is only for weak people.

  • 18. 0 0
    Iran
    • Jake
    • 11.02.10
    • 16:08

    Interesting turmoil there. But I do know this. The Iranian people stand as one on the nuclear issue. So I expect the incessant whining will continue regardless of the form of government.

  • 17. 0 0
    John
    • dave
    • 11.02.10
    • 15:55

    ''At least not for the long term'' the great wall of china protected china for hundreds of years from mongols attacks. at the end it happened. but better to have a non permanent protection than nothing. for example condoms re not a solution for the aids problem for which we dont have a cure for now but it doesnt mean we shouldnt use them for protection. so put the war instead of aids and wall instead of condom.whats the difference? the wall(the condom) reduces the infiltration(aids) rate, cant stop it 100% but 70%. so we shouldnt have war(sex) if we want it to be 100% but we have to have war(sex) to protect(reproduce or have fun) our people(both sides). dont we have right to reduce the risks??? ok wall(condoms) re unconfortable but better to be unconfotable than dead(aids and war both kill people for sure100%)

  • 16. 0 0
    My "apartheid wall" protects my family and me
    • Yonatan
    • 11.02.10
    • 15:34

    Kfar-Sava is only 5 km (c. 3 miles) away from the West Bank town of Qalqiliya. Before the "wall" was erected between the two towns (it's a fence along this stretch, not a wall), many people were killed in bombing and shooting attacks here in Kfar-Sava. This includes several high school students. Since the barrier was put up, there hasn't been a single terror incident. I like my "apartheid wall." And if it protrudes into "Palestyinian territory", that's their fault, not ours.

  • 15. 0 0
    #10 Joe Hill
    • Yonatan
    • 11.02.10
    • 15:25

    "until now iran has not started a war. " - Joe Hill Until Aug. 30, 1939. Hilter's Nazi Germany had not yet started a war. Is the demcratic West to wait until Iran fires its first nuclear missile at Europe before taking action, in similar fashion to isolationist United States from Sept. 1, 1939 (the day Germany attacked Poland). to the attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941.

  • 14. 0 0
    #2 is right, the wall must come down
    • Ahmed Habib
    • 11.02.10
    • 15:16

    The apartheid wall is meant to opress and steal land! It must come down! "attacks are made difficult by the security fence and the gates surrounding West Bank residents ? (Abd al-Muaz Muhammad, Ikhwan Online, the Muslim Brotherhood Website, June 2, 2007 ) ?For example,? Ramadan Abdallah Shalah said, ?there is the separation fence which is an obstacle to the resistance, and if it were not there, the situation would be entirely different? (Al-Manar TV, November 11, 2006 ).

  • 13. 0 0
    NO OUTRAGE??? PROOF POSITIVE OF HYPOCRISY
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 11.02.10
    • 15:05

    From this article: "Security forces opened fired at protesters and fired teargas in central Tehran,"..." security forces attacked opposition leader Mehdi Karoubi,"..." security forces fired shots and teargas at supporters of opposition" Where is the alleged moral outrage and hollow indignation from the anti-Israel crowd. Heck by now they would be accusing and comparing Israel to Nazi Germany, if Israel was reacting to a Palestinian protest. Ah the deafening silence. You see there are protests everyday in Esat J. and at the fence in the W. Bank that Israel allows mostly without incident. So again we see the selective criticism employed by the anti-Israel crowd and their true motives revealed. They don't fight for "freedom" universally as an idea, just antisemitic ravings using politics as cover. So those who wonder why they are accused of it and say it is a Zionist tactic used to stifle debate and criticism of Israel, it is this blatant double standard that is the proof.

  • 12. 0 0
    Americans here should worry about their own gov.
    • jc
    • 11.02.10
    • 14:32

    Instead off bellering for the Iranians to change their government...americans should be demanding that obama keep his word of change for the good in the USA....he has gone back on everything he said he would do so far as change is concerned.....and I wonder why.....just take a look at his top 3 advisors....all zionist...

  • 11. 0 0
    @john
    • Ralph
    • 11.02.10
    • 14:27

    The security wall works perfectly against terrorism, but Islam seems to have some problems all around the world.

  • 10. 0 0
    no more iraq or afghanistan
    • Joe Hill
    • 11.02.10
    • 13:33

    What have the us to do with the internal affairs of iran. they don't mix with those in the us. until now iran has not started a war. the us have already iraq, afghanistan and it looks like there is more to come. the big warmongers are beating the drums and innocent people are going to die for the sake of their democracy. concerning walls, the us have their wall in the south and isreel has the top of the bill.

  • 9. 0 0
    May God bless the Green of the Iranian opposition
    • WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
    • 11.02.10
    • 13:01

    And protect its followers from the dangers they face in the coming days.

  • 8. 0 0
    FREEDOM for the democracy loving people of Iran
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 11.02.10
    • 12:24

    may millions of flowers bloom.

  • 7. 0 0
    my thoughts and hopes are with the iranian people
    • eric
    • 11.02.10
    • 11:56

    the dread is knowing that many will pay a heavy price...

  • 6. 0 0
    Sure, let's give them nuclear weapons too
    • Joe Sittizen
    • 11.02.10
    • 10:12

    And the Iran supporters out there want to give these Islamofascists nuclear weapons too. Iran is more and more becoming a major threat not to Israel, but to the Arab nations in the region and to Muslims everywhere.

  • 5. 0 0
    Bread not nukes! Stand up for freedom and peace with Israel
    • Realist
    • 11.02.10
    • 09:57

    Iranian workers do not need Google to stand up for freedom.

  • 4. 0 0
    The Islamist regime in Iran is reading itself for
    • Jonathan
    • 11.02.10
    • 09:35

    a massive attack against its opposition from home and its perceived enemies from abroad. Shutting down the means of communication is one way to attempt to ensure that no information about the illegal activities of the regime is passed to the rest of the international community. Let us all hope the world will not be fooled any more by such acts about the real face of Islamism and its intentions with regard to Iran, the Middle East and the world as a whole. After all, we were on this journey in the 1930s...

  • 3. 0 0
    Very very sad
    • Mike
    • 11.02.10
    • 05:26

  • 2. 0 0
    Everyone but Israel knows walls dont work
    • John
    • 11.02.10
    • 04:51

    At least not for the long term...ANother double standard vis a vis Israel

  • 1. 0 0
    Sure....
    • Other View
    • 11.02.10
    • 04:30

    Does it apply on Israel as well?