Turkey, Brazil FMs: Iran nuclear agreement still alive
Ahead of meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister, Brazilian FM says 'we will always encourage Iran to take a flexible position.'
By News Agencies Tags: Turkey Iran Brazil Iran nuclear Iran sanctionsThe foreign ministers of Turkey and Brazil, speaking Sunday ahead of a trilateral meeting with their Iranian counterpart, said they still believe in the nuclear swap deal signed between the three countries in May.
|
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu speaking at a news conference in Istanbul on June 22, 2010. |
| Photo by: Reuters |
Turkey and Brazil mediated and persuaded Iran during a meeting in Tehran in May to store 1,200 kilograms of its low enriched uranium in Turkey until the fuel for Tehran's research reactor is delivered.
The Tehran agreement was, however, rejected by world powers as insufficient. The United Nations Security Council then imposed a new resolution and fresh sanctions on Iran last month in response to its nuclear program, which the West believes is aimed at developing nuclear weapons.
However, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Sunday said he believes the swap deal could still be useful as a diplomatic tool. "The Tehran agreement has created a framework," he said during a press conference with Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim.
"This is a facilitating instrument for increasing confidence building measures."
Davutoglu and Amorim met prior to a scheduled luncheon with their Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki.
"We will always encourage Iran to take a flexible position. I think that's in their interest," Amorim said. "But I think that other countries should act accordingly."
"We believe Iran should be able to pursue a peaceful nuclear program, but also give the world assurances that it has no military component."
Amorim is in Turkey as part of a Middle East tour that will also take him to Israel and Syria. Turkish officials said the meeting with Mottaki was added at the last minute at the request of Tehran.
The meeting comes one day before European Union foreign ministers reportedly plan to approve the "toughest ever" sanctions against Iran during a meeting in Brussels.
Davutoglu also said that Iran had expressed willingness to hold talks with the European Union about its nuclear program after the end of the month of Ramadan in early September.
Catherine Ashton, the EU's foreign affairs chief, wrote to Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili last month inviting him to resume negotiations.
"Mr Mottaki confirmed that he was in favor of the meeting after Ramadan. Obviously that depends on the flow of developments, but nobody is against holding the meeting in principle," Davutoglu said.
He was referring to comments made by Mottaki before his latest visit to Turkey. The Muslim fasting month of Ramadan ends in the first half of September.
"As soon as possible we are trying to start negotiations again between Iran and P5+1 and we will also do our best in order to start the technical negotiations as soon as possible," the Turkish foreign minister added.
The P5+1 comprise the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council - the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China - as well as Germany who have been locked in a protracted standoff with Iran over its nuclear ambitions.
Under the May deal, Iran agreed to transfer 1,200 kg of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Turkey within a month and in return receive, within a year, 120 kg of 20 percent-enriched uranium to keep Tehran's medical research reactor running.
But Western diplomats said removing from Iran 1,200 kg - enough, if highly enriched, to make a nuclear weapon - was less significant than when it was first brokered in October last year because Iran's stockpile had doubled in the interim.
At the time of the original deal in principle, which Iran backed out of soon afterwards, 1,200 kg represented about 70 percent of the country's known LEU reserve.
The Security Council imposed a fourth round of sanctions on Iran on June 9. Brazil and Turkey voted against, angry at the West's dismissal of their deal which they said made new sanctions unnecessary.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
@Dani My country will prevail! AKP will no longer exist! Kilicdaroglu is coming!! Turkey will never be isolated! Turkey holds strategic importance for many countries which surround her! I don't even believe Israel will cut his ties off with his wife Turkey! :-) Go Figure!!
If people take nuclear disarmement seriously, then all should get rid of their nukes. It is the height of hypocracy for the nuclear club to try to prevent others while holding on to their own benefiting from all the inherent security and strategic advantages. Turkey-Brazil deal was always about delaying Iran, not stopping and that is what Obama had originally aimed at anyways. There is a new world out there as Inonu once famously predicted. Better get used to it.
@Dani The EU is not a credible friend of Turkey! What have they done for Turkey?? for decades they supported and funded the PKK Terrorists to politically damage Turkey and stop her from moving forward! and now that Turkey is looking eastwards they do not like it! Sometimes these situations are created by the very hands which aim to tackle them! So I think the West should take measures in rectifying their relationship with Turkey otherwise they will not just lose her to Iran but maybe also to a much bigger fish such as Russia!!!
What the difference between Hamas and PKK from my point of view no one.Terrorist are terrorist and you decided to be part of it sooner your country will star enjoy the consequences of the arrogance of his government.
The Teheran declaration was exactly what Obama wanted, obviously the US doesnt want dialogue. GO IRAN, GO TURKEY, GO BRAZIL!
Spot on!! How on earth can the US have the face to criticize the efforts of those (Turkey & Brazil), which produced the results that the US sought in the first instance?? It simply underlines one of two things. 1, the US was not sincere when it asked for what it thought was undeliverable! 2, Shocked by the fact it was delivered, it succumbed to overwhelming Israeli pressure to denounce it as "Not Acceptable"!!!
Did you notice that Turkish Airlines has direct flights to Sao Paolo. Ten years ago even the director of THY would not have been able to show Sao Paolo on the map and the relations between the two countries were almost non-existent. Now there is trade and lots of technological and scientific collaborations with Brazil which is, despite its huge problems, a very powerful country in many respects. Will IAF attack Turkish Airlines now ? Well, try if you can :)
I think they want Iran as nuclear power in order to create a new axis in the area together with Syria,Lebanon and of course Hamas. Facing an enemy coming from the outside is one thing but having a traitor working from the inside who know everything about our defenses is crazy. The Turkish government has made his choice we need urgently to take measures before to late.
Let's go ahead and declare war on Turkey. See what happens.
How can we explain that even Jordan, one of the closest US ally are asked to process their own civilian Unranium enrichment ( produce electric power) in a third country? Jordan is signatory of NTP. Its clear that US and its allies want to keep the dependance of Arabs technologically and perpetuats israeli domination of the reagion!!! I dont thing any one would tolerate this vision.
The world was one step to be destroyed during the so called Cold War in the conflict were involved all the major powers but thanks G-D the realize that there will be no winner, no one was using Martyrdom as flag and philosophy in order to achieves political goals. Vice-versa from your point of view there is nothing wrong every one should be happy do dies in the name of Islam. It look like a simple interest conflict you wish to die we wish ti be alive and happy with our families.
Whether by Russia, France, US or UK, Iran has always been targeted as a rich source of oil. Between 1900-1930, the entirety of the British Empire was run on Iranian oil. In 1953, the CIA, at the request of Churchhill, overthrew Iran's democracy, the first in the Middle East, for BP oil interests. The Western powers even destroyed things like Iran's first wind mill when it came to be, and the first national railroad. The point was always keep Iran in the dark ages so its oil could be looted at a price. Khomeini was even encouraged by the CIA to return to Iran as a way to capitulate the Shah.
I think it is higly unlikely Turkey will seek nuclear power from Iran! another country maybe! but not from Iran!
I mean really, he looks like he's one beer can short of a six pack. But that's besides the point, I'd like to hear more from Mr. Davutoglu on how things are moving along with the extermination of Kurds and the occupation of Cyprus? Isn't it funny how there was never a Palestinian "struggle" back when the Ottomans occupied it? I wonder why?
TY^his is a dead duck agreement, repudiated by the international community, now Turkley tells ius it is a basis for a framework agreement. Iran is deathly afdrtaid of getting taken down by either israel or teh US or both. Turkey is shilling for the mad mullahs. No one can trust Turkey, no one can trust Iran. Brazil, who knows, but she is of less concern. Ignore these maneuvering as they are the last gasps of a nervous Tehran
I don't think Turkey trusts Iran but she knows she has to have nuclear power in order to survive in that region! Turkey has alot of enemies both internal as well as external to Turkey! I think she was stupid not to have seeked nuclear power from the very beginning! Turkey must take her steps both fearlessly as well as cautiously!
Turkey is the last country desiring a nuclear Iran in its own region. Any logical person can see that.
Unfortunately, there are very few people who can understand what you mean
Turkey is the last country desiring a nuclear Iran in its own region. Any logical person can see that.
So what,s the majority Sunni population doing about it as the signals emanating from Turkey are the usual concoction of confusion and rhetoric ?
Only ignoramuses in the West try to exploit differences between the sects of Islam. Sunnis and Shiites don't oppose each other against infidels, get a clue.
Yes, a nuclear Iran may be undesirable for Turks, but I doubt if they would be the "last" ones to consent to it. Turkey has other pressing issues and frankly, Iran is the least military threat and a huge trade partner of Turkey.