• Published 14:14 13.08.10
  • Latest update 14:38 13.08.10

Russia to begin loading fuel into Iran's nuclear reactor next week

Russian spokesman: Loading reactor is key step towards starting up the reactor at the Islamic Republic's first nuclear power plant.

By Reuters Tags: Israel news Iran nuclear

Russia said on Friday it will begin loading nuclear fuel into the reactor of Iran's first atomic power station on Aug. 21, an irreversible step marking the start-up of the Bushehr plant after nearly 40 years of delays.

Russia agreed in 1995 to build the Bushehr plant on the site of a project begun in the 1970s by German company Siemens, but delays have haunted the e1 billion project and diplomats say Moscow has used it as a lever in relations with Tehran.

A nuclear reactor in Bushehr

A nuclear reactor in Bushehr, Iran.

Photo by: Bloomberg

The United States has criticized Moscow for pushing ahead with the Bushehr project at a time when major powers including Russia are pressing Tehran to allay fears that its nuclear energy program may be geared to develop weapons.

But Western fears that the Bushehr project could help Iran develop a nuclear weapon were lessened when Moscow reached an agreement with Tehran obliging it to return spent fuel to Russia. Weapons-grade plutonium can be derived from spent fuel rods.

The U.S. State Department said it did not regard Bushehr as a proliferation risk, but emphasized that broader concerns remained about the direction of Iran's nuclear program.

"Russia's support for Bushehr underscores that Iran does not need an indigenous enrichment capability if its intentions are purely peaceful," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement in Washington, noting the Russian fuel deal for Bushehr mirrored a broader fuel swap proposal that Western powers have offered Iran in hopes of halting its domestic enrichment program.

Russian and Iranian specialists are to begin loading uranium-packed fuel rods into the reactor on Aug. 21, a process that will take about 2-3 weeks.

"This will be an irreversible step," Sergei Novikov, a spokesman for Russia's state nuclear corporation, Rosatom, said by telephone. "At that moment, the Bushehr nuclear power plant will be certified as a nuclear energy installation," he said.

"That means the period of testing is over and the period of the physical start-up has begun, but this period takes about two and a half months," he said, adding that the first fissile reaction would take place in early October.

The head of Iran's nuclear energy agency, Ali Akbar Salehi, said a ceremony inaugurating the plant would be held in late September or early October, when the fuel is moved "to the heart of the reactor."

The reactor will be linked to Iran's electricity grid about six weeks later when it is powered up to a level of 50 percent, Salehi told the semi-official Mehr news agency.

Diplomats say the Bushehr plant, monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, poses little proliferation risk and has no link with Iran's secretive uranium enrichment program, seen as the main "weaponization" threat, at other installations.

The State Department, noting "the world's fundamental concerns with Iran's overall nuclear intentions," said it was important to remember that Iran remained in serious violation of its broader obligations to the IAEA.

Russia started the delivery of nuclear fuel to the Bushehr plant in late 2007 and deliveries were completed in 2008.

Moscow and Washington agree that importing fuel makes unnecessary Iran's own enrichment project - the main focus of Western concerns that Tehran is trying to make a nuclear bomb.

Iran, the world's fourth-largest crude oil producer, rejects such allegations and says its nuclear program is aimed only at generating electricity or producing isotopes for medical care.

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had said on March 18 that Russia planned to start up the reactor at the Bushehr plant in the summer of 2010.
 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 29. 6 1
    Nuclear Power
    • Ali
    • 14.08.10
    • 07:27

    Congratulations Iran.

  • 28. 3 0
    So what did the US learn from Danny Boy?
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 14.08.10
    • 02:32

    If you read UCRL-LR-I 15542 you will discover that you don't want to make nuclear weapons out of reactor grade Plutonium.

  • 27. 2 0
    A bit of light reading
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 14.08.10
    • 02:30

    Those in a panic over the start-up of Bushr should read UCRL-LR-I 15542. The US did test a reactor grade device. If memory serves, it was the Danny Boy device in shot Nougat with a yield under 1 kt.

  • 26. 4 4
    In all this talk nobody remember Chernobyl.
    • Mary
    • 14.08.10
    • 01:04

    Russians know like nobody else the size of haos incurred by faulty nuclear reactor, this why they'd rather have it not too close to their land, in the country where the damage may not be obvious for years. do you really think that Iranian govmt will be in the hurry to admit if something would go wrong? HIGHLY unlikely. Even Americans with their level of technology and size of the available land are not in the hurry to built huclear power stations.

  • 25. 12 4
  • 24. 32 5
    If Israel hits Bushehr...
    • MattyRoyer
    • 13.08.10
    • 23:39

    and creates a environmental disaster, it's international credibility is finished, its isolation complete.

  • 23. 25 4
    The biggest threat that Bushehr poses to Israel
    • binny
    • 13.08.10
    • 23:21

    The biggest threat that Bushehr poses to Israel is that Israel will be unable to restrain itself from making a fool out of themselves by making a huge deal about it when Bushehr goes online. The IAEA and the entire rational world recognize Bushehr as a peaceful, monitored power generation site that is not part of any secret Iranian nuke weapon program. Loud Israeli complaints about Bushehr will undermine any legitimate claims there are about any secret Iranian nuke weapon program. Any claims by Israelis of a link between the two will be used against Israel to damage Israel's credibility. So while it is an easy homerun for Israeli politicians to play petty local Israeli politics with Bushehr, they will hurt Israel in the long run if they do so.

  • 22. 15 8
    Russia could have solved the Iranian problem
    • Logios
    • 13.08.10
    • 21:31

    There is something self-contradictory in Russia's behavior. On the one hand she objects to Iran enriching Uranium even to the low 3.5% level for power plants, and on the other hand supplies Iran with such processed product which allows Iran to keep her stock of Uranium. A good solution for the contradiction would have been for Russia to demand from Iran partial payment "in kind", that is, pay for the fuel bars by giving to Russia the enriched Uranium used to produce them. This should have been acceptable to Iran, after all, they claim that their Uranium is enriched to serve as fuel. The fact is that Iran does not have enough Uranium to run many power plants, so they would have run out of the stuff soon enough. Problem solved.

  • 21. 26 1
    YAWN. Big non-event.
    • binny
    • 13.08.10
    • 20:34

    Bushehr has as much to do with any secret Iranian weapons program as a lollypop factory in the Settlements. They will peacefully generate electricity at Bushehr, and the more Israel screams about Bushehr, the more Israel will sound like Chicken Little. Israel should clearly state that Bushehr isn't the issue, that it is the secret nuke weapons programs that are the issue.

    • 0 15
      Wrong
      • An American
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:08

      Over time Iran can use the plutonium out of the spent fuel rods to make nuclear weapons..

    • 20 1
      Bushehr
      • Roger
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:39

      Maybe Israelis don't know that nuclear reactors can be used in the production of electricity. The one they have in Dimona is just for producing nuclear weapons.

  • 20. 1 22
    What about the Sanctions?
    • Brod
    • 13.08.10
    • 20:13

    Is this what the Sanctions are all about empowering the Ayatollahs with nuke?

  • 19. 6 56
    Russia did not learn from WW2
    • An American
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:32

    Hitler turned on the Russians and Iran could turn on the Russians too. Iran has global ambitions and I do not think they will get along with a bunch of atheists forever.

    • 28 4
      You retard,you did not learn from 2003!
      • Jewel
      • 13.08.10
      • 21:03

      Remember Iraq?

    • 1 11
      Iran is not Iraq
      • An American
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:00

      We'll see who is right in the end.

    • 11 1
      An american
      • chris b, london
      • 13.08.10
      • 23:02

      Not a fan of the current iranian regime at all, but i think its a bit of a leap of faith to suggest they have "global ambitions". Iran doesn't ned massive belligerence from the likes of the US, Israel, or the EU - when left alone they have enough enemies within the gulf area. Do you much about the historical differences between persians and arabs? Shia and Sun'ni?

    • 1 5
      fear the alliance
      • bill
      • 14.08.10
      • 01:21

      jewel you are too naive... Iran has made an alliance with the devil and wants to nuke the world! Hitler himself is talking through the islamists and will reclaim world order by insalling a islamic, fundamentalist, crypto facist communist dictatorship! you could learn a lot from american

  • 18. 2 40
    Not Good
    • An American
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:28

  • 17. 1 47
    Russia Busheher N. Reactor Iran
    • The Teacher/Instruct 13.8.10
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:21

    Russia will one day regret the help that she is giving this criminal Iran regime. The snake's head might well turn around & strike the heart of Russia. Russia's southern borders are full of Islam states !....Like many of the post war states,most live only for the hour & money..........Russia is no exception.

    • 1 4
      "Russia will one day regret..."
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 14.08.10
      • 07:04

      i seriously doubt that russia has ever regreted anything. russia thinks that it has outsmarted obama. obama thinks that he has outsmarted everyone. the only one who is a clear winner is iran. iran has outsmarted and outlasted all of them. those who think that the bushehr reactor can be fully supervised are fools. regards, cipora

  • 16. 53 4
    This is not a threat to anyone
    • Scientist
    • 13.08.10
    • 18:07

    this is a fact, this plant is being monitored the fuel is being returned (spent rods) this is the safest part of the nuclear ambitions of Iran, it is what we DONT know that is a threat - bomb this and nothing will come of it.

  • 15. 13 42
    way to go obama...
    • judah ben hur
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:53

    removing those missiles from poland and czech republic really worked eh?

  • 14. 14 72
    When will Israel act?
    • Diana
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:44

    It looks like Iran has reached the point of no return. How much longer will Israel wait before taking military action????

  • 13. 4 40
    Hello
    • Khanokh
    • 13.08.10
    • 17:42

    Reza zoroufi love Netanyahu and Barak,I think this is time to attack Iran

  • 12. 3 0
  • 11. 9 0
    #76
    • Sonny USA
    • 13.08.10
    • 16:51

    May I add that if brains were gas; you wouldn’t have enough gas to power a piss ants motorcycle around the inside of a Cheerio.

  • 10. 10 31
    If it becomes a threat to Israel?
    • Sonny USA
    • 13.08.10
    • 16:39

    You know how cares about this reactor; this whole issue is designed to put Israel on the frontline of the nuclear issue. Iran is no wear near having a nuclear weapon’s capability; look closely at what Iran has in terms of centrifuges; they’re not even the right kind to enrich Uranium to weapons grade material. Don’t fall into a trap with Iran they are manipulating the issue to hid 30 years of building terrorist groups to fight a proxy war against Big Satan(US) and Little Satan (Israel). Besides if this reactor does become a threat to Israel on missile launched from Israel can take it out; I just hope that the Russian Tech’s are there at the time with all the Iranian leadership. Now that would be planning.

  • 9. 7 56
    Russia's rebuff of US agreements on Iran,
    • Israeli
    • 13.08.10
    • 16:31

    US president bowing to murderer dictators all over the world, Mosque on ground zero, putting public relations before soldiers life in Afghanistan, I wonder what will happen when the patience of the citizens of the United States of America will end.

    • 78 7
      You know nothing of the US
      • Uncommon American
      • 13.08.10
      • 19:38

      How dare you speak in such a way? Obama was showing respect to important people. He also bowed to the Japanese emperor. THE HORROR! WE'RE GOING TO DIE! Give me a break. And the Mosque isn't going to be on Ground Zero, you nincompoop! It will be blocks away, and the project is being undertaken by a man who poses absolutely NO danger at all to anyone, and our own government said as much. But don't let the inconvenient facts get in the way of your paranoid, racist claptrap. As for putting PR before the lives of service members, let me tell you something, as someone who actually served in the US military: He isn't doing anything that shouldn't have been done. In fact, he's doing what is LONG overdue: The closing of Guantanamo, pulling out the cesspool that is Iraq (fight your own battles; we shouldn't have to do it for you,) and focusing on rebuilding trust. Unfortunately, thanks to intransigent Israelis such as yourself, Obama is losing support in the Muslim and Arab world. And all because you are too proud to actually follow international law, and stop building illegal settlements and committing war crimes. No wonder the Arabs hate us. With friends like you, who needs enemies?

    • 15 2
      #9- When The Patience Of American Citizens Ends...
      • Bill
      • 13.08.10
      • 22:04

      You are absolutely correct...we Americans are disgustingly patient. Even after 62 years the US taxpayer continues to provide funding to BOTH SIDES of the dispute in an attempt to stop them from killing each other. If Americans patience wears thin...its cause may very well have been that Americans get sick of the disrespect we get from Israelis like you. Israel gets vital support from the US...but please remember this...we owe you nothing. You spout on and on about unbreakable ties between our nations...and about our shared values...and every once in a while you verbalize your true feelings. I do appreciate the honesty of your talkback...but the cost was a little bit of this American's patience.

    • 6 1
      Right on!
      • just the facts
      • 14.08.10
      • 06:20

      You certainly are an uncommon American....a thinking one.

  • 8. 22 1
    Putin is right..
    • randy
    • 13.08.10
    • 16:00

    The millitary budget of the U.S is 25 times ours. That signifies that their house is their fortress. clever...very clever. It means that we to must build a strong and resistant house. Because we can see what is going on in the world. we know... Our comrade mr wolf knows who to eat, He devours other countries, headless. He has no intention to listen to anybody.

  • 7. 34 1
    Netanyahu+Barak+Lieberman BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
    • Peter of Florida
    • 13.08.10
    • 15:54

  • 6. 138 34
    If Israel has nuke why not Iran?
    • Rabin
    • 13.08.10
    • 15:38

    They are both theocratic and rogue state. Both terrorist. Both fascist. Except Israel also has some characteristics of Somalia. Piracy.

  • 5. 76 14
    So What?
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 13.08.10
    • 15:38

    The VVER-1000 reactor is a water cooled, water moderated system fueled with Uranium Dioxide. There is no reprocessing plant to separate Plutonium, and any Plutonium produced would have far to high a percentage of isotope 240 to be used for weapons manufacture. Chicken Little was not right, and the Chicken Little clones who are all upset about the startup of the VVER are wrong as well.

  • 4. 62 16
    Does This Mean . . .
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 13.08.10
    • 14:57

    The Persians will have electricity? The Immortals marching to electronic music? Less gasoline will be needed domestically. They might even buy electric cars. And computers, they'll have electricity to run computers.

    • 53 15
      Mark not just that
      • Chris linthwaite
      • 13.08.10
      • 15:37

      but they will be able to charge their mobile phones. It is good news for the iranian people.

    • 3 12
      Nuclear
      • Dan
      • 13.08.10
      • 16:37

      Why won't they buy electricity? Does Swiss, Italia and part of German live in obscurity at night because they rejected the nuclear? Quite the contrary, Mark. Let's have a talk with Green Peace and see if better energies don't exist. Hint: Iran is a sunny country with a great free surface.

    • 6 0
      Dammit!
      • Q
      • 13.08.10
      • 18:25

      Dammit. I don't like nuclear, simply because it creates this waste that is a blight upon the world for hundreds of years, that requires containers that must be maintained for extended periods of time. It's basically mortgaging your childrens future. But just as importantly. Iran sends it super-dangerous waste to Russia. According the dearming treaty it has with the US, the only country that they feel safe storing nuclear material in is Canada. I don't want more radioactif crap in my backyard, especially not for a country that would not even tolerate my living there.

    • 5 2
    • 9 8
      @ S
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 13.08.10
      • 21:36

      Well the spin cycle on the washing machines I doubt vibrators are legal in Iran just like it is illegal to own one in Mississippi

    • 1 0
    • 2 0
      Reality Check
      • Mark Lincoln
      • 14.08.10
      • 01:48

      Most nations in the Gulf are now considering or actually pursuing a nuclear power generation program. There are very sound reasons, not the least of which is that if you have only one export product, and it is getting scarce, you are better off selling it for a high price and generating power cheaply.

  • 3. 64 14
    Why not attacknow while the Russians are around.
    • labhras
    • 13.08.10
    • 14:32

    Easy way to meke another enemy.

  • 2. 26 97
    Go Hit IT
    • Aaron, NY
    • 13.08.10
    • 14:30

    WE are capable of hitting this nuke plant. Some +100 F-16 and some shelterbombs are enough...... Go Israel GOOOOOOO Hit the balls of ahmedi.......

  • 1. 64 8
    Which explains the positioning of the S-300
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 13.08.10
    • 14:23

    in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. You don't have to give the weapons system to iran if you promise to protect Iranian airspace yourself.