Iran dismisses UN report citing boost in nuclear work despite sanctions
In confidential report, IAEA sees rise in uranium enrichment and voices concern about what it called Iran's 'repeated objection' to the agency's choice of inspectors working in the country.
Tags: Israel news Iran nuclear UNIran's total production of low-enriched uranium has risen by around 15 percent since May to reach 2.8 tons, according to a United Nations nuclear watchdog report, showing Tehran is pushing ahead with disputed work despite tougher sanctions.
Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's envoy to the IAEA, said the report by new agency chief Yukiya Amano "has damaged the agency's technical reputation" and was "not balanced" compared to those of his predecessor, Mohamed ElBaradei.
 |
Iranian technicians at work at the Bushehr Nuclear Plant in Iran, November 2009. |
| Photo by: AP |
He said all of Iran's nuclear activities were under the IAEA's "complete supervision," Mehr News Agency reported.
The confidential report, obtained by Reuters on Monday, said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) remained concerned about possible activity in the Islamic Republic to develop a nuclear payload for a missile.
The White House called the findings "troubling" and said it showed Tehran was still trying to develop a nuclear weapons capability.
"The IAEA's latest report on Iran again demonstrates that Iran is refusing to comply with its international nuclear obligations, and continues its effort to expand its nuclear program and move closer to a nuclear weapons capability," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said.
The IAEA also voiced concern in its report about what it called Iran's "repeated objection" to the agency's choice of inspectors working in the country, after Tehran barred two UN nuclear inspectors from entering in June.
"The agency rejects the basis upon which Iran has sought to justify its objection," the report said, also referring to earlier cases where Iran raised such objections.
"It is also concerned that the repeated objection to the designation of experienced inspectors hampers the inspection process and detracts from the agency's ability to implement safeguards in Iran," it added.
Western powers are likely to see the report's findings as backing up their suspicions that Tehran is seeking to build nuclear bombs and underlining the need for the country to enter serious negotiations to curb its nuclear program.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Goggle Earth. 20°43'07"N 45°35'01"E. Tell us what you see.
Iran's denials merely compound our own state of denial about their true intentions. IMHO, the most important denial to date is our collective denial to form a coalition of the willing to defang Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullahs. We ignore their nuclear development at our peril.
The U.S. has once tried the path of "coalition of the willing" (sounds familiar, eh?) in Iraq, and look where it took us. Never again. Israel has nukes and can try to "defang" Iran on her own. LOL.
iran should have a Nuke for its defense Iran is threatened every day.. remember the words 'ALL options are on the table:" Iran has never attacked any nation in recent times.... USA and isreal have killed more innocent than any country in the world...You see actions speak louder than words
Israel made a very fateful decision in the 1950s to become the first nation to introduce nuclear arms to the Middle East. Nixon and Kissinger (Zionist jew) made and equally fateful decision to lend U.S. support to Israeli weapons of mass destruction. Now, the chickens are coming home to roostIsrael made a very fateful decision in the 1950s to become the first nation to introduce nuclear arms to the Middle East. Nixon and Kissinger (Zionist jew) made and equally fateful decision to lend U.S. support to Israeli weapons of mass destruction. Now, the chickens are coming home to roost.
Most of us in the free world are totally opposed to this disgusting campaign against Iran and the Iranian people. Just because Israel is paranoiac and wants to divert attention from its oppression of the Palestinians and human rights violations, doesn’t mean we have to support their quest for bombing a country that has done nothing wrong to them or anyone else. It is not Iran that’s the aggressive country in the ME. It is not Iran that has nuclear weapons in the ME. It is not Iran that should be boycotted but Israel.
Who is "us", Tony??? Civilized and educated, eh? giving even 2 cell phones and 2 ipods to each Iranian (for both hands) wouldn't make Sharia governed country civilized.
The latest IAEA report, GOV/2010/46, dated today reveals that "4. On 28 August 2010, Iran was feeding natural UF6 into 17 cascades of Unit A24, and 6 cascades of Unit A26, at FEP. All 18 cascades of Unit A28, the remaining cascade of Unit A24 and the remaining 12 cascades of Unit A26 (6 cascades of which were under vacuum) were also installed, but were not being fed with UF6.3 To date, all the centrifuges installed are IR-1 machines, of which there are 164 in each cascade. Installation work in Units A21, A22, A23, A25 and A27 was ongoing but no centrifuges had been installed. As of 28 August 2010, there had been no installation work in Production Hall B." (paragraph 4, Section A1). In simple terms, Chicken Little and all her chicks are still wrong. As for the Fordow (Qum) plant the report states "17. Since October 2009, the Agency has been conducting, on average, one design information verification (DIV) at FFEP per month. The Agency has verified that the construction of the facility is ongoing. As of 18 August 2010, no centrifuges had been introduced into the facility. The results of the environmental samples taken at FFEP up to 16 February 2010 did not indicate the presence of enriched uranium." (paragraph 17, section A.2) Which is to say that last years imminent threat is no where near being anything much more than a hole in the ground with some pipes. Haaretz readers will be hearing breathless assessments of impending doom, and I hope when the reports are publicly released by the IAEA, that you will compare what I have posted with what the IAEA posts, and the blather pumped out by a few 'undisclosed sources'.
Shoving the middle finger at the world.
ISrael did not kill teh NPT. Everything comes down to intent. Kindly show where ISrael has threatened anyone with its aleged nuclear arms. Kindly show where ISrael expolded any nuclear test weapons. Come now show us teh proof or shut yer yap
Also. Check out the tests with South Africa
israel received them tested as a gift from France and stupid America.
whats good for the goose its good for the gander... Either get in the NPT or don't even comment on any member
Certain nations feel when it comes to deterrence nuclear weapons are the only language Israel understands. It does, after all, have its own arsenal and a history of belligerence. It indeed killed the NPT.
Did not supply any nuclear weapons to Israel Tony. Israel had, and has, the ability to design and produce as many as it needs. As for tests, well, there is the Vela Incident, and certain seismic anomalies elsewhere that might indicate tests.
I check frequently for evidence they have. Now shallow depth seismic events have occurred in Iran which could have been tests during the last decade.
Who gives you the right to attack a Muslim nation. Just because the world has listen to jewish PR for 60 years it does not give you the right or the US to attack them. Israel is the only country in the middle east with a nuclear weapons therefore first in line for an attack.
What does Israel want more from Obama? 1) Weapons 2) 3 Billion in aid every year 3) Vetoes at the UN 4) unqualified support in its "fight against terrorism", and constant state of war with it’s neighbors. It is quite simple.
You have forgotten the economical situation in US and your enmity with Arabs. Just think once when persians has identity problem with the jewish? Then when Israel do not loose any opportunity to damage Iran, why it does not open a port for reducing enmity with Iran? When Iran has attacked another country that attack you? These are all important to answer, although Ahmadinejad is not defendable.
There is something self-contradictory in Russia's behavior. On the one hand she objects to Iran enriching Uranium even to the low 3.5% level for power plants, and on the other hand supplies Iran with such processed product which allows Iran to keep her stock of Uranium. A good solution for the contradiction would be for Russia to demand from Iran partial payment "in kind" for future reactors it will build, that is, pay for the fuel bars by giving to Russia the enriched Uranium used to produce them. This should be acceptable to Iran, after all, they claim that their Uranium is enriched to serve as fuel. The fact is that Iran does not have enough Uranium to run many power plants, so they will run out of the stuff soon enough. Problem solved.
Israel was the first nuclear armed nation to refuse to sign the NPT. After seeing that it was all good with no penalty at all, India, Pakistan, and North Korea later followed Israels lead. It ironic that Israel has lately become the cheerleader and kibitzer of IAEA enforcement in the case of Iran. It is a mystery why Iran doesn't renounce the NPT and kick all the inspectors out of Iran. It would be easy to announce that since there are nuclear armed nations outside the NPT and outside of UN oversight, it is pointless anyway.
Ms. Durson, how much is your monthly check from Tehran? Or are you doing all this anti Israel lobbying pro bono?
Israel did not 'kill' the NPT. Nor has Israel 'rendered the IAEA useless." Israel is a founding member of the IAEA. The Israeli program was well underway long before the NPT was proposed and abiguibombs were in stockpile before the NPT went into force. Nor, might I add, was there any compulsion for ANY nation to sign the NPT. Israel remains a member in good standing of the IAEA and Ehud Azoulay is Israel's current Ambassador to the IAEA.
When is ISRAEL going to acknowledge it HAS NUCLEAR WEAPON? And that it used URANIUM in south Lebanon attack?. Finally when this TERRORIST STATE will open its plants to INTERNATIONAL INSEPECTION?. ISRAEL CAN NOT continue to act as a vandals defying the international legality. ISRAEL HAS HAD A NUCLEAR MONOPOLY in the region for several decades. You cannot hide or ignore the truth, the double standards, Israel is upset not because Iran has nukes but because its sole monopoly on nuke possession in Middleast has been broken, and with that goes its ability to bully and threaten others uncheckedl's nuclear capability forever.
The IAEA should inspect Natallie's so- called brain...there is a lot of radiation being detected. We should impose sanctions.
Trurh hurts eh? Ms Durson is usually completely correct in such matters.
When it grows up and stops playing childish games.
Lefties pretending to care for the pals won't shed tears over their fate if Israel gets eliminated ,Gaza and WB disappearing too .
Main battle tanks, APC's, Artillery, Submarines, Fighter jets, Nuclear weapons verses Palestinian rifles and RPG's. Yeah. Let me be helpless like Israel. . .
Maybe John would like to have a real life experience by living at the border with Iran or Lebanon rather than shooting off his crap from the couch.
Believe me, living at the border with Israel is not a very pleasant experience either.
Sweden, a nation with a proud military record and in close proximity to the Soviet Union had an atomic weapons program in the 1950s and '60s. By the late 1960s the plans for nuclear weapons and the SAAB 36 to deliver them were abandoned for a much more rational development, the SAAB 37. Absolute Sweden exhibits atypical paranoia.
israelis said radical islam is dangerous but americans londoners and madridians said it was israeli paranoya, we were there already, listen to what the isrealis say about iran it will turn into reality
50 pounds of currently 20% enriched uranium that Iran possesses.
20% enriched Uranium for its medical research plant in Tehran. Iran certainly would not have engaged in that level of enrichment, if its enemies had dealt with it with more honesty than trying to deceive it into abandoning what is considered Iran's legal rights under NPT by using bullying and extortion tactics like the current sanctions.
...which Israel wants to shut down, but it is fully legal under the IAEA. Israel is not legal in the eyes of the IAEA and the world. What is happening here is very interesting. As the vise is tightened on Iran, the Iranians become more self-sufficient.
long live iran
The specific quantity for Uranium enriched beyond the 3.5% for Busherh fuel in the latest IAEA report is "22 kg of UF6 enriched up to 20% U-235 was produced. . . " Less than 20% is Low, not Highly Enriched Uranium. The IAEA Sept 6 Report (GOV/2010/46) states "the results of the environmental samples taken at PFEP indicate that the maximum enrichment level in the DIQ (i.e. less than 20% U-235 enrichment) had not been exceeded at that plant" Read the reports, don't listen to Chicken Little.
though it is the highest enrichment that fits under that category. By your standard, any 'Low Salt/Sodium' food that contained 99mg of sodium per 100 gr/ml serving would now have to be relabelled 'High Salt/Sodium'
Must not be allowed to happen.
Why would that make anyone nervous. OH, BTW it would be 5 minutes to Saudi capital. 30 minutes to Paris. The Iranians talk in a non-threatening tone , so why would anyone want to bomb their facilities...makes no sense; better to give in to tyranny than resist the Iranian war machine. Did I say 39 minutes to Moscow.
What when extremists in Israel get the majority in the Knesset?
your baseless paranoia! Stop counting the minutes and do something about your condition. While doing that ask yourself why Iran, a country that has NOT attacked any country except verbally in Israel's case, would build nukes and attack its best oil and gas customers and trade partners, ie. Russia, and Europe?!!! Get a grip, man.
That goes two ways. Its 39 minutes from Moscow to Iran also. So Iran has a missle or two. If they use them they will become crispy critters.
Because Iranians want to see their nation turned into a glowing hole in the ground? Or because paranoids with a deterrent cannot imagine any other nation might want a deterrent? Exactly WHY has no nation used nuclear weapons since 1945? Why did the Soviet Union send the K-172 (Echo II Class) missile submarine to sit off the israeli coast during the Six Day War? Because Israel was close to having nukes and if it had used them Captain Nikolai Shashkov would have launched a nuclear attack on Israel. Anyone who starts tossing nukes around will be expunged.