IAEA chief: Iran failing to clarify nuclear intentions
New Security Council sanctions will make life more difficult for UN inspectors, Yukiya Amano warns.
By DPA and Haaretz Service Tags: Hillary Clinton IAEA Israel news Iran nuclearThe head of International Atomic Energy Agency, Yukiya Amano, on Tuesday expressed frustration with his failure to persuade Iran to speak openly about its nuclear intentions.
There has been no progress in the past weeks in getting Iran to clarify possible activities related to developing nuclear weapons, said Amano, who recently replaced Mohammed El-Baradei as chief of the UN's nuclear watchdog.
"So far I haven't got the response that I hoped," Amano told the DPA news agency.
World powers suspect Iran of using civilian nuclear development to mask a weapons program, a claim Tehran denies.
The United States is currently leading a diplomatic push for a fourth round UN of sanctions against Iran over its refusal to cooperate with UN inspectors.
Early in January U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton vowed to push for harsh diplomatic measures against Iran.
"Our aim is not incremental sanctions, but sanctions that will bite," Clinton told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a lobby group.
"Let me be very clear: The United States is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons," she said.
But Amano warned that new sanctions would mean international nuclear inspectors have a more difficult job in the short term.
"As Iran quite often declares, they don't want to act under pressure," the 62-year-old Japanes diplomat said.
Nuclear inspectors are also seeking information about 10 new enrichment plants that Iran has announced it would build.
Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said in February that work on the firts two new sites would begin in the coming year.
"We are now following this issue carefully. But we don't have specific pieces of information on the construction of these 10 or two facilities," Amano said.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
We all wait with bated breath for Israel to clarify its nuclear intentions.
Thus they are obligated to it. Jewish Israel is not a signatory thus is not obligated. One wonders about the biases of those that release Moslems from keeping their word on treaties while demand that Jews keep treaties that they never signed on to.
The details requested by the IAEA have not been provided. There has been no additional information provided over the last year on the outstanding requests. This is all detailed in the IAEA report GOV/2010/10 available at: http://www.iaea.or.at/Publications/Documents/Board/2010/gov2010-10.pdf The IAEA has a great deal of information provided by the USA in the last year. While it is no where near conclusive, and some of it contradictory, it does raise questions which HAVE to be answered. Iran is not in full compliance with the Additional Protocols, and has not provided information necessary for the IAEA to certify it is in compliance with the NPT. Until those conditions are fulfilled, the UNSC should act to impose greater sanctions.
With Israel and Pakistan not cooperating with the IAEA, why the push on Iran?