• Published 19:07 04.03.10
  • Latest update 19:16 04.03.10

Hamas: Abbas selling Palestinians illusions of peace with Israel

Hamas official calls on PA leader to 'step aside' and stop offering 'compromise after compromise.'

By Reuters Tags: Hamas Mahmoud Abbas Middle East peace Israel news

Hamas on Thursday called on Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to resign, accusing him of selling the Palestinians "illusions" by moving to resume peace talks with Israel.

Hamas official Izzat al-Rishq told Reuters Abbas lacked a negotiations sponsored by Washington, although the Arab League had given its approval.

The criticism of Abbas by a high-level member of the Islamist group is likely to complicate Arab efforts to mediate between Hamas and Abbas's Fatah faction.

The schism has weakened the Palestinian cause, with Hamas ruling the Gaza Strip independently of the Palestinian Authority.

"Mahmoud Abbas has to step aside. The Palestinian people want a solid leadership that leads them to their national rights and not a leadership that offers compromise after compromise," said Rishq, who is a member of Hamas's politburo.

"Resuming these talks is selling illusions to the Palestinian people and playing with their emotions. Eighteen years of talks with Israel have achieved zero. What is there to expect from an extra four months?"

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday Israel hoped to begin indirect negotiations with the Palestinians next week during a visit by George Mitchell, the U.S. Middle East envoy.

Palestinian officials said they wanted the U.S.-mediated talks to focus initially on defining the borders of a state they hope to establish in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Rishq said Palestinians would not be closer to realising their aspirations for independence because Abbas had ruled out "resistance" as a tool of struggle with Israel.

"If we don't have options, Israel will be tempted to mount more aggression and further refuse to give us any of our rights," said Rishq, who lives in exile in Syria along with other members of the Hamas leadership.

"The decision to go back to the talks gives the Israeli enemy the cover to continue settlements. There will not be anything left to negotiate on," he added.

Abbas has balked at direct talks with Israel until it stops settlement construction totally. He called Netanyahu's announcement in November of a limited moratorium insufficient.

Rishq did not rule out Hamas agreeing to talks with Israel if they were conducted according to terms that would realize what he described as Palestinian rights.

But he said there was a "U.S.-Israeli veto" that Abbas was following to prevent reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas.

Hamas has ruled Gaza since it won a brief civil war in 2007 against supporters of Western-backed Abbas's more secular Fatah faction. Egyptian efforts to bring about agreement between the two sides foundered.

The movement had said it could live peacefully alongside Israel if Israel withdrew from all Palestinian land it occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War, although Hamas's 1988 founding charter calls for the destruction of Israel and for restoring all of British mandate Palestine.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 6. 0 0
    Hamas Talks About RIGHTS
    • Bobby G
    • 06.03.10
    • 16:16

    RIGHTS ??? What rights ??? The right to slaughter innocent Israelis ??

  • 5. 0 0
    Peter from Florida, what are you doing in the fight against Islam
    • Aaron C
    • 05.03.10
    • 16:14

    Because like it or not, Islam is fighting against you, every single second of every single day. Hamas is one of its faces, al-Qaeda another, and if you allow them to grow in strength and take over previously safe parts of the world (not so long ago, not only Gaza but even Sinai was safe under the Israeli shield) you risk a slow and bloody defeat. One day there'll be suicide bombers on your childrens' public transport, will you be crying out for "peace" then? The PA and Fatah are just another face of Islam and Arabism, though better at hiding it from the naive. Peace with them is impossible, aiming for peace is dangerous if it involves lowering one's guard.

  • 4. 0 0
    Peter, you have not thought this out.
    • J Thomas
    • 05.03.10
    • 09:01

    You are right that peace is not in Israel's perceived interest. But the illusion that we are working toward peace is valuable to the USA. So the longer that Mitchell can make it look like there could be some possibility for peace, the better it is for the USA. He is not wasting your tax dollars to do his best to work toward peace even if peace is actually impossible because of Israeli policies. At some point it might be useful to pretend to "punish" Israel for those policies. We could for example cut off the official aid to Israel, replacing it completely with under-the-counter aid. We could officially revoke Israel's MFN status, and unofficially subsidise Israeli exports to the USA enough to make up for it. We could officially stop US military technology giveaways to Israel, replacing them with things that we say are smuggled. Etc. The better we can pretend we are not 100% supporting Israel in everything, the better our relations with the rest of the world.

  • 3. 0 0
    Peter in Florida
    • Arnold
    • 05.03.10
    • 05:06

    Peter...have you ever seen the future of America if you do not stand up against the onslaught of the non-democratic face of Islam. Islam breeds on others free rights and sucks the freedom out. The following is a video taken in Ft. Lauderdale. Enjoy it and please comment. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM8bQA6FYW0

  • 2. 0 0
    #1 Peter
    • H
    • 04.03.10
    • 20:16

    A land like the one you describe already exists. It's called Disneyland. what's it like?

  • 1. 0 0
    Mr Mitchel you are waisitng your time and out tax dollar
    • Peter
    • 04.03.10
    • 19:49

    It is not in israel's interest to have peace in the middle east. It is time for America to undestand that. There will only be peace if there is one country for two people multireligious democratic under a new constitution. Otherwise not peace what so ever.