• Published 00:00 16.11.07
  • Latest update 00:00 16.11.07

E-mail snub to Israel by Prince Charles' aides sparks furor

Senior aides say "no chance" prince would ever visit Israel so as not to boost Israel's international image.

By Anshel Pfeffer Tags: UK

Senior aides to Britain's Prince Charles said there is "no chance" the prince would ever visit Israel as such a visit would boost Israel's international image. The aides wrote the comments, in August E-mails, after outgoing Israeli ambassador to Britain Zvi Heifetz extended an invitation to the prince via principal private secretary Sir Michael Peat and deputy private secretary Clive Alderton.

In E-mails published Thursday in London by The Jewish Chronicle, Peat politely thanked Heifetz and said the prince "would love to come." However, in a later E-mail Alderton sent to Peat, he complained that he was "being pursued."

Alderton asked is it "safe to assume there is no chance of this visit ever actually happening?" Alderton noted, "Acceptance would make it hard to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH [Prince Charles] to help burnish its international image. In which case, let's agree a way to lower its expectations."

The publication of the E-mails in the newspaper with the largest distribution in the British Jewish community is already causing a storm. Some community leaders asked to comment have stressed Prince Charles' fondness for the community and Jewish matters, while others are critical of his refusal to visit Israel.

There has never been an official visit of a member of the British royal family to Israel. Charles came to Israel in a private capacity for a few hours in 1995 for the funeral of slain prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.

Prince Edward, the earl of Wessex and the youngest son of Queen Elizabeth, came to Israel for a visit classified as "private," in September. He had been invited by the Israel Youth Award program, a self-development group for Jewish and Arab youth that is affiliated with the Duke of Edinburgh's Award International Association.

His father, Prince Philip, the duke of Edinburgh, has also visited Israel to tour Yad Vashem, where a tree was planted in honor of his mother Princess Alice of Greece, who was recognized as "Righteous Among the Nations" for sheltering a Jewish family in her Athens home during the Holocaust.

In the past, senior British government sources and sources close to the royal family have said no official visit could take place before a peace agreement between Israel and its Arab neighbors.

Charles' spokesman told The Jewish Chronicle in response to the report: "This is simply an internal E-mail about a possible visit by Clarence House officials to Israel. Any potential visit by the Prince of Wales would be undertaken at the recommendation of the government. The prince is continuing his regular engagement with the Jewish community in the UK and abroad.

Outgoing Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, who worked throughout his service to improve Israel's image, stated that "if that is what is written between two people so close to the prince, it reeks of worse than hypocrisy."

Prince Charles (Reuters)

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 622. 0 0
    who reall cares
    • carole gerst
    • 01.10.08
    • 03:33

    who really cares what prince Charles thinks after all he didn't care what the people felt like when he refused to give up his mistress, caused diana to flip her wig, who wouldn't! and the queen is no better, is this the exsample she sets, her father must be rolling over in his grave. get rid of all of them or make William king.

  • 621. 0 0
    Though Israel would love to KICK brits in the BUTT
    • The Archives
    • 06.04.08
    • 18:51

    In addition to the email of turning the ROYAL Visit into an ADVANTAGE, as a bargaining chip for military co-operation between England and Israel, Israel could provide intelligence of terrorist attacks to prevent bombings like the underground train bombs that killed 52 civilians and the bus explosion in England.

  • 620. 0 0
    #619 Eric - The Koran discussion IS NOT OVER
    • * BEN JABO
    • 25.11.07
    • 17:12

    You ducked it and ran away--My response is in another thread--

  • 619. 0 0
    # 618 the koran discussion is OVER, ben (2nd try)
    • eric
    • 23.11.07
    • 02:07

    i posted this elsewhere aready...and i'll be posting this to you every time you bring it up, ben~ because like i told you before; you pick and chooose the passages in it that serve YOUR argument...and I pick and choose those that serve mine...and we both know that my thoughts will never penetrate your hatred...and we both know that your hatred will never influence my thoughts...so the discussion is moot...and one that i don`t have the energy to pursue with someone as close-minded as you. so you can rant and rave, like you always do, about talking me into a corner...like you do with everyone who grows tired of responding to the steadfast rhetoric of someone who refuses to even read what`s being said before unleashing another set of "facts" that do not address what has been said. try responding sometime to something that`s said; instead of just spewing out more of the same hatred. maybe then we`ll discuss the koran says about christianity and judaism. MAYBE then, ben. but until then...do us both a favor and stop haranguing me about it like a broken record; because i`m telling you right now that i won`t; not until YOU learn that there`s there`s two sides to every issue and a discussion requires "dialogue" and is NOT just the persistent spiel of your OWN arguments without ever "directly" addressing the opposing point of view. in other words, ben...if you lack the decency to respect MY point of view enough to direct your responses toward it instead of responding with insults and repetitious tirades of hate; then "talk to the hand" ben, because i`ll not be wasting my time on you. so yup...i guess you`ve just talked me into a corner, ben... now go ahead and inflate like a rooster among his hens... fluff your feathers and strut while you beat your chest... but remember that the only ones you`re fooling are yourself and them.

  • 618. 0 0
    #617 Eric - Oh yes I have
    • * BEN JABO
    • 22.11.07
    • 19:00

    I displayed that knowledge each and every time I exposed you---Most recently about the Koran and the Suras of hate, and your allegation about me in another thread--Still waiting for you to come back with some facts instead of vacous rhetoric--

  • 617. 0 0
    # 606 every creature has a brain, ben jabo
    • eric
    • 22.11.07
    • 05:38

    as for knowledge?; you've yet to demonstrate that.

  • 616. 0 0
    #615 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 22.11.07
    • 03:15

    I replied to it elsewhere -- You made the same query twice--

  • 615. 0 0
    #612, Ben Jabo...
    • Silvienne
    • 21.11.07
    • 19:17

    "What I am trying to say is the autopsies are not infalliable--On TV they find out the truth inside of an hour, actually less because of commercials" LOL!! Yes, but what about those factual documentaries like Forensic Files and Cold Case Files...I read once that in about half of the deaths which are autopsied the wrong cause of death is written on the death certificate... Ben, you didn't reply to my post #609....? I posted to you about Prince Charles, who sits on his estate in Scotland wearing his kilt and waits for his mother's death..keep waiting, Charlie, because the Queen's mother lived to be 102 and the Queen herself is in excellent health..Charlie won't see the throne anytime in the next 15 to 20 years despite all his hoping...perhaps he'd better try black magic or something...Israel should not take any notice of what he says; no-one in England ever does...

  • 614. 0 0
    #613 Silvienne - That's what I said when I
    • * BEN JABO
    • 21.11.07
    • 19:08

    my post--They left out the body--Look at #612, they put that one through--

  • 613. 0 0
  • 612. 0 0
    #609 2ND TRY Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 21.11.07
    • 17:56

    Somehow, the body of my original post vanished enroute--Think of Stacey Peterson, her husband is a cop--She vanished--The story is in the news EVERY day--The third wife was supposed to have died drowning in a tub--Autopsy had a finding of accidental death--New Autopsy of Dr. Baden, said it was murder--What I am trying to say is the autopsies are not infalliable--On TV they find out the truth inside of an hour, actually less because of commercials--Whether he was or was not dragged into the house, I do not think would be much of a factor--Meanwhile,I am not going to worry about it--

  • 611. 0 0
    #609 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 22:31

  • 610. 0 0
    #608, Ben Jabo...
    • Silvienne
    • 20.11.07
    • 18:27

    "If you shoot him on your stoop, drag him over the doorsill, into the house--Last but most important, make certain he cannot testify against you--I will leave you to guess how tht would be done" Yes, but here's the thing; if you drag him into the house, the police will notice the body has been moved, and surely that is going to make the homeowner suspect...why not leave it where it is, by the front door, that will indicate that the person was in fact breaking in...

  • 609. 0 0
    #601, Ben Jabo, I don't understand this post...
    • Silvienne
    • 20.11.07
    • 18:16

    "I just want you to know, the only person I allow to use !!!! is my wife---I respect her because she is close at hand and carries a .22..Besides that, we have a lot of years invested in each other" What does the above mean? We were talking about Nick Ferriman not replying to your posts, then you wrote the above...I am now a confused person...explain please???

  • 608. 0 0
    #591-2 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 13:35

    Just one last thought about someone breaking in--A cop friend of mine once told me two basic things to be done if someone breaks in--First don't shoot him in the back--That would indicate he was leaving and no longer a danger-- If you shoot him on your stoop, drag him over the doorsill, into the house--Last but most important, make certain he cannot testify against you--I will leave you to guess how tht would be done--

  • 607. 0 0
    Charlie is the result of too much inbreeding
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 13:32

    Russian, German, Greek and English Royal houses were from one family--Leading to the inbreeds we see in Jolly Old England--Charlie is a the result of not being careful--

  • 606. 0 0
    #599-2 Eric - I have something you sorely lack
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 12:57

    Brains and knowledge of the situation--

  • 605. 0 0
    #603 Eric
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 12:55

    If you took the time to understand, you would see that each time I encounter Ferriman, he gets backed into a corner and cannot respond-- He is like you, makes statements which cannot be backed up--I am eagerly awaiting your refutations of the Koranic hate verses--Do NOT mention hatred and bigotry, you only have to look at your ignorant self in the mirror--Don't forget, refute the Koran Suras that I posted, if your ignorant self can--

  • 604. 0 0
    charlie believes he is from King David!!
    • Paul
    • 20.11.07
    • 09:46

    Did you know the Antichrist will be a Prince "And the people of the other prince who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood; and even to the end there shall be war, and desolations are decreed." (Daniel 9:26b, Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary) Both Charles and William are Princes. The Antichrist will promise peace, but will destroy instead -- "and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many" (Dan 8:25) The Antichrist will sign a covenant with Israeli leaders, a covenant which many Bible scholars believe will usher in the false peace of the first part of the Tribulation Period - "And he shall enter into a strong and firm covenant with the many for one week [seven years] ... (Daniel 9:27b, Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary) This issue of Prince Charles saying that he will not visit Jerusalem until and unless a peace agreement has been signed is a very interesting development?

  • 603. 0 0
    # 599 because silvienne; ben just doesn 't have any nails!
    • eric
    • 20.11.07
    • 08:08

    you should know ben by now... pay close attention to ferriman's comments; and watch ben fluster...bluster...and try his best to muster an answer... then resort to his typical ben jabo tirade of accusations and unconnected incoherent claims. one of which is the hit run thing...lol... not everyone has time to go on endlessly... and most people here come and go as they have time...or interest...or the internal fortitude to deal with disenchantment brought by the hatred and bigotry and closed minds that are encountered in these talkbacks. and some return more often than others...and then there are those who thrive on expressing their hatred and bigotry...and closed minds. THEY are the ones who never miss a moment's chance...and they exist on both sides of the issue. sorry... just unloading a few thoughts... ferriman is pretty straight forward and concise...and his points as far as i've seen, are completely valid... lol...and ben doesn't like straight forward and concise and valid...he prefers stereotypes, innuendo, propaganda, and "because i said so". ben just doesn't have the nails to "nail ferriman to the wall". all he has is a hammer and a sore thumb.

  • 602. 0 0
    Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 01:19

    You would know better than I--Is it true that Prince Charles has become a religious person-- I had heard that as part of his nightime prayers he prays for his mother to pass and leave him the throne before his passes away..?? Sort of reminds me of the girls who is always a bridesmaid, never a bride--

  • 601. 0 0
    #599 Silvienne - The very fact he runs away
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 01:16

    clearly indicates I have nailed him--I just want you to know, the only person I allow to use !!!! is my wife---I respect her because she is close at hand and carries a .22..Besides that, we have a lot of years invested in each other--

  • 600. 0 0
    #598 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 20.11.07
    • 01:13

    I believe I told you this before--When I lived in Brooklyn, I took a bus to work--On a hot summer day (before a/c on busses) I left my window partially open, about to shoulder level--Somebody threw a rock, hit the window which acted as a shield--Next case, I was driving a stick shift car, going through a bad neighborhood, window open, no a/c, a kid threw a rock, hit the car, I took my foot off the gas, car stalled, I ran after the kid--A girl of about 18-20 came over to me and said, "Oh, they all do that", as if to justify the rock throwing---As a matter of fact, in that same area, public projects were under construction, the builder put mesh over the window so they wouldn't get broken before anyone had a chance to move in--

  • 599. 0 0
    #597, Ben Jabo...!!!!!
    • Silvienne
    • 19.11.07
    • 19:48

    "If you should ever get involved in an accident with Ferriman, make certain you take all the particulars--As my past experience with him has shown, he is strictly a hit and run artist--Once he is confronted with facts, he vanishes from the scene--It has happened time and again, and you can be certain I have it in my files--" !!!! Why can't you nail him to the wall before he makes his escape??

  • 598. 0 0
    #596, Ben Jabo...
    • Silvienne
    • 19.11.07
    • 19:47

    I agree with your statement that it would depend in which state the shot-stone thrower was..in Connecticut when I came here there was a guy, Michael Ross, on death row for killing eight teenage girls and altogether it took 20 years for him to get the needle, and even then, he had to petition the court himself asking them to stop appeals from outside people on his behalf! This is a total travesty-Ted Bundy was in the chair in Florida in five years. I hope both of them are burning in hell forever and even that is too good for them. "Just hope nobody ever hits your car with a rock, you will not be calm, cool and collected--Far from it!!!" Where I live sometimes kids throw potatoes at cars..when that happened to me I got out of the car and chased the kid down the road...couldn't catch him though...I was boiling furious...

  • 597. 0 0
    #594 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 19.11.07
    • 18:34

    If you should ever get involved in an accident with Ferriman, make certain you take all the particulars--As my past experience with him has shown, he is strictly a hit and run artist--Once he is confronted with facts, he vanishes from the scene--It has happened time and again, and you can be certain I have it in my files--

  • 596. 0 0
    #594 Silvienne
    • * BEN JABO
    • 19.11.07
    • 18:05

    Personally, I believe that if the fellow was shot for throwing stones, it would depend on the jurisdiction and location of the court--It's not just Texas, a lot of the Southern states treat housebreakers the same--If he entered at night, he knew the odds were you would be home, and his thoughts would have been to do harm if was detected--But, that has nothing to do with rock throwing--You might check some of the stories where rocks were thrown from highway overpasses, breaking the windshield, hitting the driver, causing injuries or fatalities--Remember, David killed Goliath with a small stone that hit between the eyes--As a matter of fact, shepherds no matter where they tend their flocks, are quite adept at using a slingshot to defend the sheep--Just hope nobody ever hits your car with a rock, you will not be calm, cool and collected--Far from it!!!

  • 595. 0 0
    In bed with Saudis but Shunning Israel
    • Joan Stuchner
    • 19.11.07
    • 17:49

    I think a picture is sometimes worth a thousand words, and over the years a number of heads of states have been photographed cuddling up to the Saudis - 'heads' who often shun Israel. Of course, some try to play both sides. The only thing worse than the royal family's apparent hypocrisy is the attitude of many British Jews, who are dyed in the wool royalists. To these I say, 'Stop making excuses for this family, and stop accepting titles from them!

  • 594. 0 0
    #591, Ben Jabo to Ferriman
    • Silvienne
    • 19.11.07
    • 17:31

    Ben, with regards to your post to Nick Ferriman, what do you think would be a court's decision here in America if a civilian shot another civilian who was throwing or starting to throw a stone at him? I've never seen a case like this on CourtTV or Forensic Files or Cold Cases (which I watch a lot) and am wondering what the law would decide in a case like this. Do you remember several years ago there was a case in which a Japanese exchange student dressed in a costume walked through the door of a private house at night and the homeowner shot him dead? I read about this, it was in Texas I think, and it was ruled justifiable homicide and the homeowner was received no punishment, which I think was correct. It is very understandable that at night, seeing a stranger coming in your door, you'd defend your home...

  • 593. 0 0
    Some Arabs are Semites/Shemites
    • John Isenhower
    • 19.11.07
    • 08:13

    After the world was destroyed by water, the only people left were Noah and his wife (Shem's mother), and his three sons Shem, Japeth and Ham, and their three wives. Shem's descendants by and large are the people of the Middle East, including both Arabs and Israelites, rightly, all are Semites. To refer to Jews only as Semites goes against the Jewish Bible. There is large element of racism in this, while it rightly appears in the West that Anti-Semitism against the Jews is racist. Time to remove the confusion on this by correct terminology. Many Jews also incorrectly refer to themselves as Ashkenazim. The original Ashkenazi in the Jewish Bible was of Japeth, a European; thus if Jews [Israelites] are Ashkenazim, it is because their ancestors married Europeans. Israelites are called God's Chosen people because they were chosen to be Missionaries and Messianic by Him. Japeth's people were the original Europeans. Ham's people were the Africans. JI aka Yussef Gideon, San Antonio, TX

  • 592. 0 0
    Israelite Christians and Catholics should support Israel
    • Yussef Gideon aka JI
    • 19.11.07
    • 07:59

    It is well known that the Prince is Arabesque. He once published a book showing that preference in art forms. All good Christians should support Israel against all enemies foreign and domestic. Jesus says who is a good Christian, reportedly right after death. El elohe Israel. El eloi Israel. God is the God of Israel. God, my God, is the God of Israel. We are given a lifetime to repent. If however, that does not occur, though it is Jesus' say so, most will go to Hell if unrepented. Brauch ata Adonai. Blessed be the Lord. Pray for the Prince. Pray for Israel's leaders. Pray for me. Pray for all sinners in the name of the Israelite Messiah God, YHWH.

  • 591. 0 0
    FERRIMAN
    • * BEN JABO
    • 19.11.07
    • 05:38

    Let us assume for the moment, one or more of the five were members of YOUR family--It does not matter how many were killed, the intent was to kill as many as possible, since the Kassams were fired at civilian towns & villages---It seems that in your view 5 is a negligible numbers--To those families that suffered the loss, it is quite substanial-- Hamas gave the stone throwers the same treatment as the IDF did--All you had to do was read the news--A stone is a deadly as a bullet when it strikes the right place--Matter of fact, stone are used for execution of adulterers in quite a few Muslim countries--Iran in particular comes to mind. Do NOT attempt to use the old "Democracy" ploy-- Ask that question of me, and I'll tell you that he who threatens me with a stone will be treated as if he intends to kill me, which are his true intentions?Don?t tell me that I am to stand there and be a target---If they don't want to get killed for throwing stones, the solution is easy, DO NOT THROW THEM--Where in International Law does it say that stone throwing is permissible and immune from retaliation ?It is a form of deadly physical assault?Just tell me one thing, would the military or police in your country allow it..??..Please do not run away from this in your usual manner-- Ferriman: "Point four: do you, like the IDF, classify stone throwers as terrorists, and therefore can be shot dead? If so, where in International law does it say stone throwers can be shot dead? Or is this another case of Israel making up its own rules of engagement that have nothing to do with the obligations of modern secular democracy?

  • 590. 0 0
    # 579 to a solid jew re: "grace"
    • eric
    • 18.11.07
    • 22:58

    this is a interesting post you've made; which may be profoundly good, or horribly skewed; depending on its intent. so i'm compelled to ask if the "grace" you mention includes coming to terms with what is ACTUALLY "right" and following that path with conviction and "internal fortitude", etc... OR: do you mean that all jews should assume the arrogant and obnoxious attitude of those few who assume and claim their righteousness simply because they ARE jews? the first is of course a very noble suggestion for all people... but the latter...?

  • 589. 0 0
    #16; Sam who is 'Sad to say it'.
    • Phil
    • 18.11.07
    • 22:35

    What utter rubbish Sam. I presume you are one of the 90% of Americans never owning a passport and, thereby, never having left Tennessee. Via a third party and, no doubt some Chinese whispers, it might appear Prince Charles doesn't have the ability to tackle Middle eastern politics head on. So what? Its a shame the comment came out but does the Middle East really need Prince Charles? I think not.

  • 588. 0 0
    # 560 to the hypocrite exposed in new york (3rd try!)
    • eric
    • 18.11.07
    • 22:25

    may i ask who cares what the "arab leaders" said before wwII? it is YOU and your ilk in your infinite ignorance who equate the palestinians with the arabs. and it is YOU and your ilk who made the palestinian people suffer for the acts of "arabs" against your ill-gotten state of israel. it is YOU and your ilk who have used the "arabs" and any act of aggression made by them, whether real or perceived, as an excuse drive the palestinians from their homes, occupy their land, and subject them to humiliation and oppression on a daily basis. you have alot of gall suggesting that anyone who opposes israel's crime and the PLOYS it uses to justify them! so tell me, "hypocrite in new york", what do YOU have to say about the many jews...some of whom actually "reside" in israel...who also despise israel's treatment of the palestinian people? "honest criticism"...you use the term so demurely; but you haven't a clue about its meaning!

  • 587. 0 0
    # 561 thank you peter sm...(2nd try)
    • eric
    • 18.11.07
    • 22:22

    you've just exemplified exactly what my post was saying about some people NOT being able to distinguish between the two.

  • 586. 0 0
    # 563 tsk tsk tsk, victor hardman; you proved my point (2nd try)
    • eric
    • 18.11.07
    • 22:17

    i take it you're implying that i'm antisemitic because i disapprove of israel's crimes against the palestinian people... and you have proved my point quite nicely by your comment. impartial to what, victor? how would my writing to all these journals you've conjured prove my impartiality? "all african states"? "brazil"? "INDIA"!? jeesh victor...what sort of dark and twisted world do you live in? but never mind; i don't think i care to know. let me just ask you: IF... i'm an antisemite, like you imply, because of my opposition to israel's crimes; what have you to say about jews who feel the same... and what do say about the many "jewish" israelis, which YOU are not, who also think the same way? tell me victor; what do you have to say?

  • 585. 0 0
    LA at No. 48
    • David
    • 18.11.07
    • 21:55

    I completely agree with you LA - it is laughable to suggest that antisemitism is a serious problem in the UK (outside the Muslim population). In so far as British Jews are under threat it is as a result of assimilation not persecution. British Jews are well integrated into British society and have risen to high public office. It is hard to imagine there ever being a Muslim in Israel becoming Foreign Minister but nobody in the UK cares that the Foreign Secretary is Jewish. It simply is not an issue for the vast majority of British people.

  • 584. 0 0
    Chris#2
    • Louis M. Fried
    • 18.11.07
    • 19:17

    Chris: You and HRH and his duplicitous aides deserve each other. And the altruistic British Empire didn't have blood on its hands?? No, they just conquered more than half the world by handing out scones and cucumber sandwiches.

  • 583. 0 0
    I dont care about Prince Charles
    • Mike
    • 18.11.07
    • 18:50

    All i can say is thankyou thankyou thankyou for beating Russia last night...made my day....toda raba Israel!!!!!!!

  • 582. 0 0
    # 572 PETER SM
    • Nick ferriman
    • 18.11.07
    • 18:30

    Dear Peter, Thank you for taking the time to rely to my post. In response to your standard remarks, here are six points: Point One: the Qassams have killed 5 people. From your logic, this equates to the hundreds killed each year by the promiscuous rules of engagement of the IDF. Point Two: how many Muslim victims have there been in Thailand? Or don?t they count? Point Three: two thirds of the children shot dead by the IDF were innocent bystanders who had nothing to do with the stone-throwing. But to the Israelis they are ?unter menschen?, so they have no rights, so it is okay to exterminate them. Point four: do you, like the IDF, classify stone throwers as terrorists, and therefore can be shot dead? If so, where in International law does it say stone throwers can be shot dead? Or is this another case of Israel making up its own rules of engagement that have nothing to do with the obligations of modern secular democracy? Point five: what appeal do the Palestinians have against the brutal 40-year Occupation of their lands by a callous and vindictive people? Point Six: despite the myth-making of a plucky little Israel fighting off the evil Muslims, it is Israel that has conducted a war ceaselessly on its neighbours. Only in 1973 did it not strike first. Regards

  • 581. 0 0
    prince is a pauper when it comes to reality
    • dav zee
    • 18.11.07
    • 16:23

    even the prince's mama won't let him touch the steering wheel of ruling the country, knowing what a shallow, hollow, myopic dunce he is. His 2 sons are apples that did not fall far from the tree...The prince is not needed in the ME. We have enough dupes there already. Time for the monarchy to go the way of the dinosaurs, albeit 50 years later than they should have. The prince is a proven heavy handed dolt who thinks he is more important than Isreal's proven triumphs and avoided tribulations, that it can handle without him and his entourage of playboys and their whoring women.

  • 580. 0 0
    prince
    • vidi
    • 18.11.07
    • 16:23

    Hello England!Why don"t you just get out of the Falklands? You have no business occupying other people's land, a land 20,000 klm from your island.Anyway if you ever intend coming to Israel please don't bring that kamallia with you.We don't want our fair land to be desecrated by her presence!

  • 579. 0 0
    Grace
    • solid jew
    • 18.11.07
    • 14:19

    Its time for every Israeli jew, and jews everywhere, to show more grace under attack. Grace comes from internal fortitude, belief in self, trust in your fellow jews, certainty in being in the right and on the side of eternal justice. Teach your children...

  • 578. 0 0
    #511 Say '17'
    • ballistic
    • 18.11.07
    • 12:59

    Yes, you and yours worked the primary and secondary markets; it was just business, of course. You say King David "was an attack of liberation movement against British occupiers" (er, your Benefactor). Well, I guess you then agree with the Pals right to liberate themselves by attacking the Zionist occupier. Well, that is simply wonderful, and since that is your view, I forgive you & yours for financing the Holocaust of slavery against blacks. Are you willing to forgive the Zionists who financed the Nazis and actively caused the death of countless Jews in order to occupy Palestine? Your posts don't indicate that. It sure was nice of Jews to support black civil rights since you & yours bear a good deal of responsibility by financing slave ships---can we expect reparations from Jews for our 300 year misery? Of course, we are willing to wait for funds until you re-fleece Germany for your victimhood. The wicked Zionists should kick in too. We are quite patient. Regard

  • 577. 0 0
    #571 Say Connie
    • ballistic
    • 18.11.07
    • 12:16

    A bag over the head takes care of ugly if there is need. I sent you the citations and I saw Israel won a pageant 32 years ago. So which pageants are you dreaming you and yours won? Back up yourself when you make such statements, otherwise it is BS. Bag women and homeless women are raped every day. As for posting you, well, you posted me. I thought you and I had agreed long ago when you were gnawing on me that I am not a consumer of your principle ware, which is BS. Finding Jesus didn't help your attitude any. As far as "hate" goes, you surely are a case of the black pot calling the kettle blacker. Only Kath outdoes your venom. Don't send me BS and I won't flip it back. Put a bag over your head and then check out your mirror. Regards.

  • 576. 0 0
    #498 Linthwaite
    • Eugene
    • 18.11.07
    • 10:42

    "Any 13 year old british Kid could tell you that."-Chris Linthwaite An interesting curricculum you have over there in UK, Chris. Any 13 year old can tell you something about King David Hotel bombing, but apparently nothing about the Holocaust that was taken off the school program in History. It doesn't smell well, Chris.

  • 575. 0 0
    bad little britain has own interests
    • samuel
    • 18.11.07
    • 10:35

    big arab market.bigger muslim.poor and backward but very very slowly advancing and prospering.gulf states already filthy rich.little israel,noticeably deteriorating.why wouldn't bitsy u.k. sit on the fence until the natives have sorted it out?what would you have done?they do,after all have an ambassador and trade,touristic,cultural etc.etc.relationships.oh,and yes,they actualy built the state of israel virtually from scratch.

  • 574. 0 0
    #468# Pally Brit wishes to be Israeli
    • Lou Knee
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:59

    I have never been to Nablus but if the hospital is sub standard more time should be spent fixing it than hurling stones.The unfortunate fixation on destruction that has gripped the W.Bank and Gaza is a realization that time has been wasted on fighting instead of development,it is pure frustration.The easiest target is Israel but only for people with complete amnesia.The Jordanians provided absolutely no infrastructure in the W.Bank and Gaza but Israel improved everything in an amazing fashion.The unfortunate fact that the short sighted Arabs prefer destruction to development has caused the climate of fear and mistrust.Blame yourselves!The W.Bank and Gaza could join with Israel and be like Switzerland or Singapore improving everyone,s lives.The world owes you nothing,Israel owes you nothing so stop feeling sorry for yourselves and work on development instead of rockets and bombs.Israel is the best friend you have and the best friend you could wish for:grasp the outstretched hand

  • 573. 0 0
    PAL.BRIT.@570Without the racist hatred in OFFICIAL Arab media
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:37

    Without saying one thing in English and the oppositte in Arab.

  • 572. 0 0
    NFERRIMAN What appeal do victims of Qassems have?
    • PETER SM
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:26

    What appeal did the victims of suicide bombers have? In Israel? Anywhere else in the world? What appeal did captured Israeli children beaten to death by Arabs have ? What appeal did Israelis have when they were attacked by 5 Arab armies in a War of annihilation. The Palestinian children should be protected by their parents instead of being sent out to the front lines after having their minds filled with racist hatred and martyrdom. What appeal do victims of Moslem terrorists in Thailand have?

  • 571. 0 0
    ballistic
    • Connie
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:26

    The nazi's lusted after Jewish women because they were beautiful....someone does not lust after a bedraggled ugly slovenly woman.... I don't care when Israel won the beauty contests the fact is that for such a small country they did win and you can't stand it....you are a sad pathetic woman filled with hate. This hatred consumes you and will eat you up alive...I already see signs of the decay...it seeps through your posts....don't bother answering me anymore because I won't be reading your garbage.

  • 570. 0 0
    How is it possible to criticise Israel? 560
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:13

    You mean it is not "allowed" fo me to criticise the Israeli Occupation without being anti-semitic? Not allowed to criticise any aspect of Israeli policies without committing that dastartdly sin of criticising Jews? Get real - the Israeli government is full of corruption -beyond criticism I suppose?

  • 569. 0 0
    Reply to Dr. G. Solomon (Post No. 303)
    • Johnny Weintraub
    • 18.11.07
    • 09:03

    My wife and I have been to Europe on several occasions, and we have never visited Britain. A list of names has now become available on the computer under the heading STRUMA, the rickety old vessel that was denied entry into Palestine during 1942. Scroll down the list (it is now on your computer,) and see if you do not find the name WEINTRAUB among those seven hundred that drowned.

  • 568. 0 0
    #560 NEW YORK NUT!
    • PADDY
    • 18.11.07
    • 08:30

    It would appear that Zionists knew that Palestinians existed in 1897. "The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man". This, of course, would NOT be considered "honest critism", would it? WHY? It is FORBIDDEN to criticise Israel or anything Jewish/Zionist. "Exposing hypocracy" my left cheek!

  • 567. 0 0
    # 560 Ultimate Hypocrisy
    • Nick Ferriman
    • 18.11.07
    • 07:49

    Dear Ultimate Hypocrisy, If you are going to make the claim of anti-Semitism every time there is criticism of Israel, then you have a moral obligation to address Israel?s human rights abuses. Israeli apologists never ever do that. That is the ultimate deceit and hypocrisy. Regards Nick

  • 566. 0 0
    # 548 PETER SM
    • Nicjk Ferriman
    • 18.11.07
    • 07:42

    Dear PETER SM, Yes, the sentence passed down on the 19-year old rape victim is horrendous, though punishment has yet to be meted out, pending an appeal. At least there is an appeal. The 400 innocent civilians shot dead every year by the IDF have no such possibility, nor the 100 Palestinian children shot dead by the Israelis either every year. But I do not expect any Israeli apologist to ever address the multiple and systematic human rights violations of Israel over the last 60 years. There is only one chosen people, which it seems is interpreted as a licence to brutalise everyone else. I for one am very pleased that Charles has no plans to visit Israel. It would confer respectability upon a society that is deeply and offensively racist, as so many posts here also make plain. Regards

  • 565. 0 0
    # 414 ChanahS
    • Nick Ferriman
    • 18.11.07
    • 07:26

    Dear ChanahS, You have a very creative way with historical revisionism. Who did stop the Holocaust? Regards Nick

  • 564. 0 0
    #562, peter...
    • Silvienne
    • 18.11.07
    • 06:24

    Sort of like you and PETER SM?

  • 563. 0 0
    #550 eric is going to list the world wide journals he writes to i
    • victor hardman
    • 18.11.07
    • 06:11

    n other places china ? india ? muslim states ? russia? all african states ? brazil ? we await your list eric to prove your impartiality !1 we arent holding our breath !!

  • 562. 0 0
    swiss donkey and the irish rubbernecker
    • peter
    • 18.11.07
    • 05:45

    hehe well bless my heart and bless my soul the soulmates have found each other...hallelujah and glory be the day... oyez oyez, the swiss donkey has had a revelation, he and the irish rubbernecker are here to bring Truth and Justice and then wait for it...are you ready...here it comes...their approval. Oy vay maneh ma we need to drop down on our knees and Praise the Lord, ohhhh yeahhhhh. the swiss donkey and irish rubbernecker goose-stepping along together...ohhh happy days.

  • 561. 0 0
    eric "of anti-semites and critics of israel" its quite simple
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 04:52

    Read the Anti semitic not just anti Israel sewer filth in Arab and other sources. Interesting how so called "humanitarians who only want peace"are totally oblivious to the whole package but would be denouncing racism and Islamophobia on top of their voices if it was directed at Arabs.

  • 560. 0 0
    Anti-Semitism hiding behind "criticism"
    • Exposing hypocracy
    • 18.11.07
    • 04:48

    Claiming that some may criticize Israel, without hating Jews might be valid only if the criticism were honest. When they lie that Israel "oppresses" the so called "Palestinians" who the Arab leaders before WW2 said, did 'not exist', they are not offering honest criticism but more anti-Semitism disguised as "honest criticism".

  • 559. 0 0
    "mick".selective? you mean the Royals ONLY visit squeeky clean?
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 04:34

    Only visit those who have never hurt the Brits? Or those who are never critical? Now that you have brought up selective.

  • 558. 0 0
    Linthwaite #463 - I have Not raised The Issue
    • Eli
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:56

    of Jews being victims and Jews do not claim to be victims. We USED to be victims. Now we kick ass. You portray our EXPLANATIONS of why we kick ass as a claim of victimhood. It's just an EXPLANATION. Interpret it anyway you want to. We will still kick ass. Concerning the Kind David Hotel, you got fair warning to evacuate. Your arrogance did not allow you to contemplate that Jews can wack you. After all, they were silent for 2,000 years. In 1948, we decided to whip out the big fellow! Concerning being safe in California, I already whipped out the big fellow three times. It needs a rest!

  • 557. 0 0
    short selective mind
    • mick
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:30

    what about the Balfour Declaration and the King David Hotel

  • 556. 0 0
    Free Wanunu # 536
    • Philippe
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:26

    For the treatment of palestinians you certainly mean by their arab brothers (like in Lebanon or Irak) and their own leaders (like Hamas).

  • 555. 0 0
    Free Vanunu # 536
    • Philippe
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:24

    At least Sarkozy was democratically elected by the french people. And now 71% of these french approve of his policies.

  • 554. 0 0
    # 526 Boycott.Much Ado about Nothing...AGREED,I FOR ONE AM NOT...
    • Fed-Up
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:17

    Perturbed Boycott.Much Ado About Nothing. And I sent you a last response about "Uncles" if and when it comes out.Though not important in the slightest...

  • 553. 0 0
    # 522 Boycott..I Am Obsessed,But you seem Are.Last time..
    • Fed-Up
    • 18.11.07
    • 03:06

    Enough Boycott Okay Charly boy called Lord Mountbatten uncle (yes I know the meaning of uncle thanks)For pleasure.I suppose you went rummaging to prove yourself correct.I did too(not rummamged,but to the biography of Lord Mountbatten)and the relashionship with Charles. Charles did not have an uncle. Lord Mountbatten was his father`s uncle, i.e. Charles`s great-uncle(Boycott) Did I not say he was his great uncle in my response you...Now you read carefuuuleeey as well and decide one way or t'other...Thanks

  • 552. 0 0
    FREE Vanunu.Vanunu WAS freed.He broke his conditions
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:43

    Till the suicide bombers there was no fence,along came the fence no suicide bombers. You sure NO Arab money goes to political parties? Tell us how "youlot" funding resulted in Sarkozy's election.? You sure there was no "youlot" funding for Royal? "Aparheid" why don't you look at what the Arabs say they want to do? What they always said the wanted to do in Arabic? What they tried to do using war and terror? Do "you lot" read?

  • 551. 0 0
    Mrs. USA
    • squaw
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:32

    "would the UK like to take back America?" Or perhaps the Red Indians could take back America?

  • 550. 0 0
    of anti-semites and critics of israel
    • eric
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:31

    why do so many lack the ability to distinguish between these two? despite the ravings of israel's apologists; the two are in NO WAY the same thing. and the comments quoted from these emails are NOT anti-semitic. they reflect an opposition to israel's oppression of the palestinians and its continued occupation of palestinian territory. as much as israeli supporters and apologists may want to deny; one CAN have a good rapport with the jewish community without kowtowing to israel. prince charles is an "actual" humanist, unlike many who procalim to be but who are in fact not. i'd have been very surprised if he'd undermined his sentiments by accepting this invitation. it's also refreshing to note that his convictions are apparently those of the royal family. but either way; i doubt very much if either of his two sons will stray from these convictions, as was proposed in one discussion i read.

  • 549. 0 0
    Er read the story!
    • jon
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:26

    Actually it was Charles's aides who exchanged the emails, not him. He is patron of a number of Jewish causes and has visited Israel. Anyway, people love Israel here now, since they beat Russia in the football tonight.

  • 548. 0 0
    Saudi Arabia Punishes Gang Rape Victim-200 Lashes.Send Charlie
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:18

    To show more British Respect "Saudi Arabia Punishes Gang Rape Victim with 200 Lashes A court in the Cradle of Islam is punishing a 19-year-old female victim of gang rape with 200 lashes and six months in a Saudi jail. "

  • 547. 0 0
    Connie
    • ballistic
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:11

    Miss universe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Universe#Titleholders Israel won something 32 years ago; miss world 1 win http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_World#Titleholders I won't comment on the rest of your post about lust. That is about nature and necessity, not beauty. Regards.

  • 546. 0 0
    Why not invite Sarkozy?
    • Free Vanunu
    • 18.11.07
    • 02:07

    If Israelis want a visit from a sycophantic poseur, who doubles as the Head of State of a country in western Europe, while insisting that he overlooks its worse-than-apartheid policies and applauds its wall-building skills and bestial treatment of the Palestinians, why not invite Sarkozy? You lot fund him. Why not use him?

  • 545. 0 0
    #520 Well, if it isn't Connie
    • ballistic
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:56

    who recently posted she was a Christian, that is wonderful. What years did Israel win any of the contests you name? Send me a citation so I can access it. Heidi Klum is beautiful and is popular because she is rather unique. Many look like Ms. Livni. So, send me a citation so I can access all these beautiful women who have won international contests. Keep reading that bible. Wonders never cease. Regards.

  • 544. 0 0
    Much Ado about Nothing
    • Boycott
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:54

    As I send this, there are 522 postings on this topic, the most on any topic for a very long time. Israel is facing all kinds of issues, including the Annapolis meeting, which could conceivably change the whole history of the Middle East, for peace or for war. But none of them are nearly as important, apparently, as what Prince Charles's secretaries said to each other. How very, very insecure you Israel-supporters must be feeling to make this huge fuss about such a trivial incident.

  • 543. 0 0
    CHANNA S "Clickfool a racist after all # 81"
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:44

    A Lombard without a life.

  • 542. 0 0
    Always the Past, the Past
    • Binco
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:42

    Dont let the past dictate what you do in Palestine today, what hapened during the World Wars or during the dark ages should not justify any injustices done today, on the contrary you should have learned from it.

  • 541. 0 0
    #486 Fed-Up
    • Boycott
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:41

    I suspect that I should not be indulging your lunatic obsession with the British royal family and their alleged Jewish connections, but here goes for one last time. Charles did not have an uncle. Lord Mountbatten was his father's uncle, i.e. Charles's great-uncle. Please read this carefully, look up the word 'uncle' in a dictionary, and then read it again.

  • 540. 0 0
    Prince Charles
    • siegfried buchwalte
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:39

    Maybe we should revive the Nazi war criminal Hess and few other friends of his deceased uncle Edward and bring them to Windsor Castle for a homecoming.

  • 539. 0 0
    ballistic
    • Connie
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:29

    As usual your arrogance overrides your common sense....It is common knowledge in Europe and other countries around the world that Israel has some of the most beautiful women and handsome men. For such a small country they have won the Miss World and Miss Universe contests and have placed 1st. and I think it was 3rd place in other Miss Universe contests... They are also represented in the world of modeling by many beautiful women.You might hate the country and the Jews but facts are facts...even the vile Nazi's lusted after the Jewish women. In the documentary by Claude Lanzmann he discusses this subject with Polish men after the Holocaust... You seem so obsessed with your hatred towards Israel ...what is the matter with you?

  • 538. 0 0
    Prince Chales
    • Mrs. USA
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:27

    Mr. Linthwaite, An interesting comment, tho' irrelevent here don't you think? Perhaps we should discuss Northern Island, or better still, would the UK like to take back America?

  • 537. 0 0
    PAL.Brit"Anti-semitism - or anti-Israel?"Read what Arabs publish
    • PETER SM
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:26

    in their OFFICIAL media. Its often not anti Israel just plain crude gutter anti-semitic lies and forgeries including videos of Arabs having their throats cut by Rabbis.Talk about projection. Not even Goebells produced stuff like that.

  • 536. 0 0
    Prince Charlie
    • Mrs. USA
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:24

    Isn't it time Prince Charles visited the final resting place of his father's mother, Princess Alice who is buried in Jerusalem?

  • 535. 0 0
    CHET.Israel is not claiming to be a nation of victims.Pals are
    • PETER S .M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:13

    Because they tried to steal it all through war and terror and lost.

  • 534. 0 0
    SILVIENNE.Linthwaite raised the issue of killing.Not me
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:08

    Did you complain to Linthwaite? Are you denying my right of reply? Who do you think you are?

  • 533. 0 0
    # 38 ka : You have got it wrong
    • christa
    • 18.11.07
    • 01:04

    What idea do you have about the Middle East and what goes on in M.E. countries ? How many M.E. countries have you visited ? I have visited eight countries, including Israel, and I disagree with you. Please dont write about things you dont know.

  • 532. 0 0
    CFOOL."GIMME"Brits. have no problem flogging "respect" for a quid
    • PETER S.M.
    • 18.11.07
    • 00:56

    So its not a matter of "deserves" is it?

  • 531. 0 0
    So who is he and why should Israel cares about his visit?
    • e.m
    • 18.11.07
    • 00:35

    Did we forget that all the problems Israel had have with the Islamic nations was and is because of British Empire Did we forget that he was the Chamberlin that he engorged the Hitler to the ww2? Did we forget that the Churchill in one of his speech during the ww2 have wishes three more Hitler?s? Did we forget that during ww2 when the Germans were sending the Jews to the death gas chambers the British have kept silenced? Did we forget that the ww2 and death of 6 millions Jews was British conspiracy? Did we forget that the British after ww2 didn?t let the Jews to return to theirs land? What is a reason that some of our politicians care about Prince Charles visit to Israel? Is that because they still believe he is the big boss? In the end be the great leader like Menachen Begin and stop kissing the British asses

  • 530. 0 0
    LABHRAS re LILLI (#508) ? do you really care?
    • Gil
    • 18.11.07
    • 00:06

    LABHRAS you don't care for the Palestinian people, And Lilli is right telling you what she did in post #491 If you would have cared for the Palestinian people, where are your posts when Palestinians kill Palestinians in Gaza, aren?t you equally torn up by it that one post can?t be found? If you had cared for the Palestinian people, you wouldn?t lecture AKLAS an Arab Israeli with Palestinian origins, on what is good for her, and what Israel should mean to her! On that day you showed every one who you really are, and Lilly is RIGHT and stop hiding it! A reminder to your arrogant responses to Aklas ? link the Article http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/920097.html

  • 529. 0 0
    # 504 Ravit, it's really funny how you right-wingers.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:58

    ....are claiming to represent the "Jews", and that even on a left-liberal Israeli newspaper like Haaretz. I would say that's called "chuzpah". Labhras and I are definitely much closer to the "Haaretz" "Jews" than you guys ever will be. And if I use the word "closer", I am not only talking about political views. Don't you understand that the decent Israelis, or "Jews", if you want, are suffering badly because of your rather deplorable behaviour...?? I'm afraid you will never be able to understand that, because your ideological extremism is making you blind for the reality.

  • 528. 0 0
    #471, 17 to ballistic...
    • Silvienne
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:35

    "Your statement "you give a 30 minute warning for King David...". is THE lie, I did not give 30 min and I am sure nobody on this talkback did" If you don't mind, please do not make light of the deaths of British people in the King David Hotel. Civilians died there, and it is not a matter over which you can appropriately be facetious. If you are a Jew, I can very easily imagine how kindly you'd take to anyone writing so "cleverly" about the deaths of Jews.

  • 527. 0 0
    #118 Lakshmi. Check this out - adding insult to injury!
    • Maureen Ann
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:34

    "Real Estate Expo in England Features Homes in Illegal Israeli Settlements." Reference: 'Friends of Al Aqsa' http://www.aqsa.org.uk/ The Guardian is also a reference source for the above. No doubt, Prince Charles also knows of the despicable swindle taking place in Palestine. Kind regards.

  • 526. 0 0
    #506 Fed up
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:31

    Yes, Diana's boys are a credit to her and I do hope the Queen lives a bit longer (although I think this royalty stuff is BS, esp if the movie the "Queen" has ANY accuracy) so that William will become King, if they need one. That horrid Camilla turns my stomach and her rejection by Brits is less than what she deserves. I thought highly of Diana, so unpretentious and lost in that royalty garbage, which is why she is dead. Regards.

  • 525. 0 0
    henry the eigth of england knew a thing or two about catholics
    • papal bull
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:29

    in one sweep he dissolved the monasteries and brought down the whole corrupt edifice of catholic england.

  • 524. 0 0
    Gil
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:27

    Your posts are not worth replying to.They are as usual full of irrelevant claptrap. But please keep expending your time.

  • 523. 0 0
    why does the vatican hate muslim turkey?
    • papal bull
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:26

    why would a tiny catholic ruratania be so mean as to wish the turks be kept well away? "use the tradesman's entrance" the vatican tells turkey the seventh largest economy in europe. is the vatican a source of hate?

  • 522. 0 0
    He said what?
    • Gordon
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:25

    I think it is useful to note that the first sentence of this article is dead wrong, as the rest of the article shows. Charles did not say that he was worried that his visit would enhance Israel's imagine - he said that he was worried that the Israelis would manipulate him so as to make his visit enhance their image and that he would not be able to prevent this. Which part of "to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH [Prince Charles] to help burnish its international image" is hard to understand? It is natural for Israel to want to use such a trip for propaganda purposes. Every nation with an "image problem" wants such visits for that purpose. But it is equally natural for their intended tools to prevent their being used that way - and if they can't be sure of preventing it, simply to refrain from going.

  • 521. 0 0
    #504 Ravit re what you can do to be rid of us
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:24

    You wrote----"You are right, it is so clear that they are here because they hate us Jews. But I am not sure we can do anything about it." You could stop electing politicians that perpetrate Crimes against the Palestinian People, and replace them with true "Peacemakers".Do that and I will be glad to leave you alone.

  • 520. 0 0
    Prince Charles the adulterer
    • Maerton
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:22

    Who would want a brazen adulterer to come and visit us anyway? Let him stay at home and break the commandments in his pagan state. Regards.

  • 519. 0 0
    Wait For The Circus To See Dumbo
    • Nick
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:16

    Hid Euro-trash wife, Diana, proved him to be a major clown. There is a reason his mother is keeping him from the crown and Israel gains nothing from granting that german imposter legitimacy. Put up a sign, "No Clowns Allowed."

  • 518. 0 0
    # 501 DINO
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:13

    "I`m afraid I wasn`t specific enough earlier, my beloved "mum" just doesn`t like (right-wing) Jews, as you can see from my posts here, it`s clearly the mother-milk....." DINO, no smileys Sir, Antisemitism is incredibly wide spread affliction. Your form is quite benign and apparently you have quite decent upbringing and behave yourself. I knew a lot antisemites - some of them were reasonable people - I expect you to be easy, nice and friendly. When next time in NYC leave me message on this talkback - I would be happy to have a drink with you... Stay well.

  • 517. 0 0
    # 503 H..re:Clickfool....BUT HE WAS VERY GROSS WAS HE NOT?
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:08

    H I think he must have been left out much of today,and is rather miffed.I too had a chuckle on reading about his business in London.But I was surprised about the naughty reply,so I said so in my short response..

  • 516. 0 0
    Gil 507
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:07

    "For your knowledge none of the Jews in Palestine fought with or for the Germans, and a high percentage of the Jewish community in Palestine fought with the British, in their campaigns in the ME." Compared to the Arabs, following their mufti al husseini, who collaborated with the Nazis hoping to bring the "final solution to the JEws in Mandatory Palestine. But of course Labarse has absolutely nothing to comment on that little tidbit.

  • 515. 0 0
    Charlie
    • JJ
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:06

    Who really cares?? the Brits did not want us to have a country back in 48 and it appears have not changed their minds. But is is really so important whether Big Ears will come or not? There seem many more important things to discuss and worry about thanthe visit of a British royal to Israel.

  • 514. 0 0
    Linthwaite - you have it backwards.
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:03

    The King David Hotel was bombed in 1946 by the Irgun because of Britain's restrictive immigration policy since 1939 that condemned those Jews wishing to leave Europe for Palestine to certain death. The policy of the British Mandatory government in Palestine was to keep Jews out of the country and to brings Arabs in.

  • 513. 0 0
    Chinese wisdom for Slowman
    • Anshel Pfeffer
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:00

    Behind every disabled man, there are always able men. Never do anything standing that you can do sitting, or anything sitting that you can do lying down. Be not afraid of going slowly, be afraid only of standing still. Going too slow is losing a cow for the sake of a turtle. A job of a thousand posts begins with a single line.

  • 512. 0 0
    # 495 ballistic.I HAVE HEARD.BUT I DON'T BELIEVE IN RUMOURS,BUT.
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:00

    ballistic I am glad you acknowledged on the "slave trade"being perpetratred/helped by their own. That aside,on the rumours of Jews helping the Nazis is something that does the rounds now and again.That you gave the info'I am most interested.When some give us links,books etc,to enlighten.. Will try and read about it,providing it is a non partisan type and it is genuine. Regards

  • 511. 0 0
    #492 Ballistic
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 23:00

    Sir/Madame, I was not there - you insist on your delusions. It was an attack of liberation movement against British occupier - you understand this parlance. Your people started primary market of slavery and my people as everybody else - participated in secondary market - nverry little for obvious reasons - Arabs were so much more prominent. Say, some bad Jews - we have them today and you admire them -worked against their own people - what is your happiness?

  • 510. 0 0
    # 499 Labhras, take it easy, a little bit of humour and.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:56

    ....sarcasm are the best weapons in order to "silence" our right-wing "jokers" here. Believe me, not really worth to risk a heart- attack....:) Not at all. P.S. I was getting much closer to a heart-attack when my good old Scots (my second-favourite football-team after Switzerland...) lost through a silly 90th minute goal against Italy. Too bad, no "tartan-army" next year in Switzerland....

  • 509. 0 0
    Labhras Ireland was Neutral during the war how Nice
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:54

    Labhras Ireland was Neutral during the war how Nice So did Switzerland but the banks were not I am sure for whose side you where cheering!

  • 508. 0 0
    #491 Lilli Galili
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:53

    you wrote------"Your responses ooze with despise and hate of Jews! Who are the "settlers"? Who are the citizens of "Israel"? Who are the posters you respond to? These are all Jews and your attitude to all is one of disgust." Should I turn a blind eye to Israel,s crimes against the Palestinian People(see 88 UN Resolutions)because you are Jews.Would that not be "Anti -semitic". I note your only defense has been the Anti Semite Card.Can you perhaps offer a somewhat more scholarly defense.Ie provide credible evidence that my assertions are incorrect. Prove to me that the "Illegal Settlers" (living in Jews only settlements) are legal or morally laudible.Please engage.

  • 507. 0 0
    L A B H R A S Keep up Reading what you like to Read!
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:52

    Keep up reading what you like to read, The important thing you forgot to mention is that the ?Final Solution? the extermination of the Jews was initiated in 1942, and the LECH`I (the stern Gang) proposal was offered at 1940. You may lack some understanding on the subject but before the idea of Final Solution came up by the Nazis there was a plan called the Madagascar Plan which was abandoned (deporting all Jews to Madagascar put them on an Island, making Europe free of Jews) The LECH`I proposed that the deportation of Jews will be directed to a closer destination `Palestine` in vision of a Jewish State, since you guys the British closed the doors they thought the germens will help them open the gates (in retrospect this was a dumb idea, BUT chronologically it was worth a try). For your knowledge none of the Jews in Palestine fought with or for the Germans, and a high percentage of the Jewish community in Palestine fought with the British, in their campaigns in the ME.

  • 506. 0 0
    # 259 ballistic re Esther--The Prince And why so many posts?
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:52

    ballistic Haven't you realized as yet that this is not a PR excercise,but a means to boost Haaretz' coffers,who put articles of this nature on various forums to stimulate/attract respondents and make money from it.(no offence Haaretz it is your job)and we do understand the situation.. And there you go ballistic explanation is out by me. Actually you are quite right.Charles will never be king,and he is well aware.The next king will be prince William, for sure.And hopefully he will follow in his dear maother's footseps too and do it justice to her IMAGE...

  • 505. 0 0
    L A B H R A S Keep up Reading what you like to Read!
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:51

    Keep up reading what you like to read, The important thing you forgot to mention is that the ?Final Solution? the extermination of the Jews was initiated in 1942, and the LECH`I (the stern Gang) proposal was offered at 1940. You may lack some understanding on the subject but before the idea of Final Solution came up by the Nazis there was a plan called the Madagascar Plan which was abandoned (deporting all Jews to Madagascar put them on an Island, making Europe free of Jews) The LECH`I proposed that the deportation of Jews will be directed to a closer destination `Palestine` in vision of a Jewish State, since you guys the British closed the doors they thought the germens will help them open the gates (in retrospect this was a dumb idea, BUT chronologically it was worth a try). For your knowledge none of the Jews in Palestine fought with or for the Germans, and a high percentage of the Jewish community in Palestine fought with the British, in their campaigns in the ME.

  • 504. 0 0
    Lili. I would leave them alone
    • Ravit
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:48

    You are right, it is so clear that they are here because they hate us Jews. But I am not sure we can do anything about it. Europe is full of them, especially people on the left or what some call them neo-socialists. BTW I don't think the Dino guy is the same as the Irishman. Yishar kohech.

  • 503. 0 0
    Clickfool
    • H
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:42

    "Sorry I was away on business." Best laugh I've had all day. Even better than the sky diving and Karate training.

  • 502. 0 0
    # 489 Observer..Amazing! Isn't It?BUT NEVERTHELESS,YOU ARE HERE..
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:39

    observer You are here too are you not?well that says it all.That it is amazing I have no doubt.The "insiders" need to get a life! By insiders do you mean Haaretz?otherwise I cannot see any,bar for us the respondents to the article.And if I may say so,the whole subject does not merit so many posts,and I have sent one precisely on this topic to Haaretz. Remember it is in the interest of the publishers that inveriably happens all the time,irrespective of its contents here in all forums. Thank You

  • 501. 0 0
    # 490 17, you are still calling me your dear friend.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:39

    ....after this (rather brutal...) exposure...?? But I have to insist, a "smiley" is still a "smiley", and in the case of Swiss-Dino it can make (almost...) all the difference. But I appreciate the fact that you appreciate that I am at least a nice "anti-Semite"...:) No nightmares tonight in little "Brooklyn"....

  • 500. 0 0
    Avraham #411, how did this turn into a genocide campaign?
    • Palestinian Prince
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:33

    The Prince simply did not want to visit Israel. He never advocated mass murdering Jews, nor supported the Holocaust. You my friend are still suffering from the Masada Complex, you're very paranoid. Give it a break. This victimhood complex of yours has made you lose all touch with reality.

  • 499. 0 0
    #482 Lilli galili
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:27

    You wrote----"Your feelings towards Jews seem to be identical - you despise us but can not simply come out and say so in so many words." Let me State again. I do not hate Jews.I despise and loathe perpetrators( of any nationality) of brutality and subjugation on a helpless People. Now the fact that you call me anti- semite simply proves you lack a credible defense for the Apartheid State of Israel and it,s actions. By the way, thanks for the compliment re Swiss Dino.Hope he sees it the same way, but as I am somewhat more radical than he ,I rather doubt it.Best not move him further away also. Btw your post has a certain 'familiarity" to it.

  • 498. 0 0
    #481 ChanahS
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:22

    The survivors of the Holocaust had no automatic legal right of entry into Palestine. What part of that do you not understand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing Read the link. Illegal Immigrants were removed from Israel as a response to the terrorist attack on the King David Hotel. Any 13 year old british Kid could tell you that. Why are you so obstinatly sticking to your guns when you are so obviously wrong?

  • 497. 0 0
    # 474 Lili Galili, don't worry, you just have to check out ......
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:21

    ....a few of our posts and you will realize quite quickly that Labhras and I are not the same persons: His English is (much, much...) better than mine.... By the way, funny name, where did you "pick that up"....??? :) From a "Spaghetti-Western"...???

  • 496. 0 0
    #462 Smadar
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:20

    That's true. I thought you may have been referring to standards like world beauty pageants use and I would be surprised if they finish anywhere near the top. Regards.

  • 495. 0 0
    #479 Fed up
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:16

    I have acknowledged blacks sold their people, on many occasions, and I also acknowledge that you and yours financed many of those ships, the most famous slave ship being the "Jesus", Mr. Goldberg of SC being the biggest financier and slave owner in SC. Now, how about acknowledging the role that Zionists played in the demise of countless #s of Jews by collaborating with the Nazis, lobbying Western states to turn fleeing Jews away, and the whole ugly scenario which Jews now TOTALLY blame on everybody else. So, how about it? Fess up, and if you don't know, research it. It is quite well documented and the signed agreements still exist. Start with "51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis", and then read "The Transfer Agreement". Then we can discuss Zionist worms and Black worms and commiserate together, how's that? Regards.

  • 494. 0 0
    # 479 "Smiley" DINO -
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:12

    My dear friend DINO, Sir, Smiley not smiley, your mother is antisemite and you too - all by your own admission. Of course you are not as malignant as humanoids from British Isles - you are a "benign" variation - usually it is associated with comfortable financial situation and I am glad for you. Keep you smiley smiley. 17, the right winger - Va', pensiero, sull'ALI(wings) dorate

  • 493. 0 0
    Amazing!
    • obserrver
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:12

    I think that the "insiders" need to get a life! One can argue till the cows come home or you become blue in the face! Nothing you can write about will make one iota of difference. In reality things are as they are...and depending on one's personal program/agenda the optic is always going to be that which they want to see. WHAT A WASTE OF TIME IT IS HERE.

  • 492. 0 0
    #471 Well 17
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 22:01

    I do apologize if I am in error, how much time did you give the King David before you blew it up? Nobody indicated a different time, so you advise us how much time Zionists gave the residents between warning and blow up time? It was still a terrorist attack. BTW, as for slavery, yes, many blacks were responsible for providing the bodies and your people financed many of the ships, all documented, so what is your point? Do you have any idea how many Jews lobbied Western gov'ts not to accept fleeing Holocaust survivors? Do a tad of research on it and you will be surprised before you start throwing stones. There were worms amongst my people and worms amongst yours too. Now, about that time lag there before killing those people, enlighten us. Regards.

  • 491. 0 0
    labhras and the hate of Jews
    • Lili Galili
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:59

    Your responses ooze with despise and hate of Jews! Who are the "settlers"? Who are the citizens of "Israel"? Who are the posters you respond to? These are all Jews and your attitude to all is one of disgust. And you want to tell me that you are here for other than expressing your hate of us in our faces?

  • 490. 0 0
    #469 BTW Chanah, I did not post #448
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:56

    so what is this "concede defeat" nonsense you have cooked up? What should I concede defeat on? Your posts have been very odd. You must need rest. BTW, if you need me to dig out the names of the Zionists who prevented refugee Jews from being accepted here and there, post me, and I will get them for you, along with citatons to some of their signed memos and letters which have been archived. Regards.

  • 489. 0 0
    #469 Chanah, thank you, but I
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:52

    have benefited from my mate, who survived, so I don't have to go on hearsay. I do not deny the horrors that took place, however, all of those responsible for it and aided it have not been brought to justice or public attention. I suggest you go to the site "Jews Against Zionism" and read about those named Jews, who aided and abetted the nazis in the slaughter of their own people (I acknowledged blacks played a pivotal role in our own holocaust of slavery) and not blame everybody, but them. One thing which may not be well known is that there are many Jews who lobbied western gov'ts not to take Jews, all in an effort to get Palestine. I don't see anybody touting Adolph Schicklgruber either, but history does not change. A lot of those around Herzl were DIRECTLY responsible for the deaths of many Jews--read the "Transfer Agreement" and/or "51 Documents:Zionist Collaboration with Nazis". There is enough blame to go around, but Finkelstein is right, it has become a business. Regards

  • 488. 0 0
    #372 Margie can now add "hypocrite to her titles.
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:42

    Margie wrote---"Look at the sort of state he does grace with his royal presence: BUSH'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL TIES TO SAUDIS RUN DEEP: According to various sources, Bush has been awash in Saudi money for years. Journalist/author Craig Unger in his new book "House of Bush, House of Saud" traced millions "in investments and contracts that went from the Saudis over the past 20 years to companies in which the Bushes and their allies have had prominent positions - Harken Energy, Halliburton, and the Carlyle Group among them." According to the Boston Herald, that includes a $1 million gift from Prince Bandar to the Bush Presidential Library in Texas. Best stop taking that US "Aid". *

  • 487. 0 0
    Phillipe # 453
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:38

    I know the Exodus made more than oe trip to the shores of Israel - perhaps this is what happened in a later journey. Thanks for the info.

  • 486. 0 0
    # 452 papal bull..YES AND BOCOTT ARGUED WITH ME THAT CHARLES DID
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:38

    NOT HAVE AN UNCLE.HE REPEATED IT TWICE. Yes papel bull,when it happened my mother was rather young,but news of this nature is well known and recoreded. And yes it was Lord Mountbatten in his boat if memory serves me right... P/S Someone had to remind people here,for sure!!

  • 485. 0 0
    Clickfool # 428 see post 373
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:36

    Not at all - I wrote that that it means "infidel" , which is what the topic was about. Jy praat twak in 373 stated quite clearly what it means in South Africa. Why should it have to be repeated. It was however not used only in South Africa.

  • 484. 0 0
    #469 Labhras
    • Daybreak
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:33

    Yes, how many Jews were doing that Labhras? You're certainly presenting a very balanced view, as usual. "Within four months of the outbreak of war [WWII], the Jewish Agency gave the authorities a list of 134,000 Jews [in Palestine] who wanted to serve in the British army -- one out of every two men of military age and 20,000 women." (Segev, One Palestin, Complete, 2000, p. 450). Morris writes of the Jews in Palestine that "their eagerness to join up was curtailed only by British reluctance to have them." (Righteous Victims, Vintage, p. 166). Eventually 25,000 to 28,000 would serve in the British army, with thousands more serving as special auxiliary policement. (ibid.) George Orwell wrote back in 1945 that "the Jewish war effort seldom gets its fair share of recognition." (Essays, Everyman's Library, 2002, p. 849). Of course, Orwell was an honest and decent man, unlike some sick and evil souls who prefer to distort history even today.

  • 483. 0 0
    #474 Silli gallili
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:32

    You wrote----"You critique is not motivated by Israel`s legal occupation, although you use it as an excuse. It is so obvious to readers that you have a deeper, much deeper negative feelings about Jews." Check laws on transfer of Occupiers population to occupied territory.That is what makes it "Illegal", as in Illegal Settlers.Did not think someone as silli as you would know that. As to hating Jews, you could not be further from the truth.I just loathe and detest perpetrators(of any nationality) of brutality and crimes such as those of the criminal enterprise that is the State Of Israel. Does that clear it up for you. Have a nice day.

  • 482. 0 0
    Swiss (Dino) and Labhras: Are you one and the
    • Lili Galili
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:31

    same person? Your feelings towards Jews seem to be identical - you despise us but can not simply come out and say so in so many words. (It is interesting, the "two" are Europeans, based on the same continent in which the Jew has had a special place in people's minds).

  • 481. 0 0
    Linthwaite wrong 463
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:31

    Refusal to allow Jewish holocaust survivors from Europe on the shores of what is now Israel has nothing to do with the blowing up of the KD hotel and everything to do with Britain's policy not to allow Jewish immgration into Palestine, while allowing Arab immigration from the surrounding areas.

  • 480. 0 0
    # 475 Clickfool...THAT WAS GROSS.
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:30

    Not a very nice projection by yourself. You only come down to "gutter level"

  • 479. 0 0
    # 439 17, wasn't there a "smiley" behind my.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:28

    ....original statement...???? Yes, I really think so (maybe it was also behind the following, related sentence, but it surely was there...). And what does it mean if Swiss-Dino uses a smiley...??? Bad luck, buddy...:)

  • 478. 0 0
    # 470..17 to ballistic--WHO HAS THE WRONG END OF THE STICK...
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:28

    17 thank you for... A good reminder to ballistic,sir or madam.. She forgets who exactly sold the blacks in Africa,and how they benefited from the trade? None other the"BLACKS"Temselves,who made a bundle of the trade. But she conveniently,not only forgets but,dismisses it out of hand.She is a twister of the narrative of her own,plus other's history as well.

  • 477. 0 0
    #473 silli gallilli
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:25

    Have a nice day.

  • 476. 0 0
    Haaretz.TO EVERYONE HERE..FRIEND OR FOE.MATTERS NOT
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:19

    If some of you think for one moment. The number of posts here make one feel dizzy. Now then,it only Prince Charles would get such an attention in Britain he would certainly be extremely pleased and bow down in humility. Of course YOU DEAR HAARETZ do exaggerate the importance you have given to this subject and I understand fully.I am only pointing out to all respondents(not to stop for it will never fill the coffers of Haaretz),BUT!I am commenting on the reality of the subject which has attracted so many of us. Now please Haaretz,would you be kind and put not only this observation of mine,BUT ALSO THE RESPONSE I SENT TO DANA(ON ANY OF HERS WILL DO)about thinking she is employed in the judiciary. Will you do this for me,eh?

  • 475. 0 0
    Important information for Fed-Up # 428
    • Clickfool
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:17

    "On thought crossed my mind,and that is how his poor wife feels about his obsession? And by what name does she call him?" Sorry I wasn't able to answer you earlier, Fed-Up. I've been in london on business all day. At night, when we're going to bed, my lovely wife turns back the sheet and invariably says, "Slide in, Big Boy".

  • 474. 0 0
    Labhras # 452 Actually, Eliyahu has a point,
    • Lili Galili
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:11

    one that many of us have noticed. You critique is not motivated by Israel's legal occupation, although you use it as an excuse. It is so obvious to readers that you have a deeper, much deeper negative feelings about Jews.

  • 473. 0 0
    For Chanah S and Alan, on Kaffirs
    • Clickfool
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:08

    You may have noticed that our South African friend fell silent. "Kaffirs" is a term of abuse used by white South Africans towards their black untermenschen.

  • 472. 0 0
    LONDENER WHO IS BEING STARVED
    • TOBIA
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:04

    If Pal children being starved their picture would be in the media. Their parents would be asking for money. You cant be talking about Israeli parents. They dont dance in te street when their child is killed. Your remark shows the intelligence that supporters of Pal have.

  • 471. 0 0
    # 446 ballistic
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:03

    Sir/Madadam, Your statement "you give a 30 minute warning for King David...". is THE lie, I did not give 30 min and I am sure nobody on this talkback did. It is a special innuendo inflammatory way to slight Jewish people for controversial action of some. American Jews were quite instrumental in African-American struggle ... We [:)] helped you [:)] By the way - did YOU sell your fellow Africans into slavery? Correct way is to state specifically who did what.

  • 470. 0 0
    #438 brer wabbit.re Collbaration
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:01

    1, Ireland was neutral during the War. 2, Here is waht some of your heroes were doing while their fellow Jews were being exterminated. incredibly, Avraham Stern, the leader of the notorious ?Stern Gang,? late in 1940, made a written proposal to Hitler, by which the Jewish militias in Palestine, would fight on ?Germany?s side,? in the war against England, in exchange for the Nazis help in resolving the ?Jewish Question? in Europe, and their assistance in creating an ?historic Jewish state.? By this date, German troops had already marched into Prague, invaded Poland, and had built the first concentration camp at Auschwitz. The deranged Stern had further bragged about how the Zionist organizations were ?closely related to the totalitarian movements of Europe in [their] ideology and structure.? Stern?s obscene proposal was found in the German embassy, in Turkey, after WWII.Some input on BIG-OT,s terrorist heroes.

  • 469. 0 0
    Ballistic # 448
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 21:00

    Usual diversion tactics Ballistic - would you like me to divert even further to what the anti-semitic nazzi loving lithuanians did to my grandfather and my fathers 6 siblings - just as a diversionary tactic, you understand. Stick to the issue or concede defeat - but stop the BS that you are so full of.

  • 468. 0 0
    Lou Knee and the West Bank Health Service
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:56

    Strange assumptions you have, Lou Knee! Fine health service in Nablus eh? Ever seen the Government hospital, experienced being held up by numerous roadblocks whilst you lie in an ambulance haemorrhaging from childbirth, or in agony from a heart attack. Chances are you wouldn't make it past the IDF soldiers. The Arabs of Israel are not disadvantaged, you say, but what has that to do with the Palestinians under suppression and occupation in Nablus and Beit Jala? I expect the Prince has discussed the issue with Mr Blair - holed up in the luxury of the American Colony hotel. He apparently is shocked at the conditions in the West Bank. Strange he didn't know that whilst he was the PM!

  • 467. 0 0
    #448 pappabull/hydra/flushman/nimiyahu
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:54

    For your edification. Saturday, March 20, 2004 : By Eddie Cassidy and Christy Parker THE heir to the British throne jetted into Cork last night and told a welcoming party: "It's lovely to be here."Accompanied by partner Camilla Parker Bowles, Prince Charles was immediately whisked from the airport in a motor cavalcade to Lismore, Co Waterford. He visits civilised States.His Mamma is next on the list.You see we have made peace.You will never know it.So keep posting your irrevelant crap.It only serves to demonstrate your lack of a credible argument.

  • 466. 0 0
    OIL MONEY SPEAKS
    • tobia
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:53

    iF he went to Israel there would be more subway bombings, Would oil be delievered to this cold wet country. Engand is being torn, do we protect ourselves from the home grown terrorists or continue to allow them into the country.

  • 465. 0 0
    Bonnie Prince Charlie
    • Stephen
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:50

    What is the big deal. This fella talks to plants,wears a skirt, marries his mistress who looks and acts like a warhorse. I am sure he is not even aware of this "jolly frightful situation, what"! Lets rather invite Britney Spears.

  • 464. 0 0
    # 422Ronen Bergman.Linthtwat regarding the British during the
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:42

    The Holocaust. Ronen Some people are not only obdurate,but suffer from blighted vision.So,no matter what they are told(which the whole word knows the perfidy of the British)they still hang on to their perceived idea and one has to fight them all the way.Otherwise,their condition is a malady which is incurable.We see it here day after day and we are immune to it,no matter how it upsets our feelings. But fight we must,and do so with vigour.To think the accusation they make about the King David's hotel being bombed,when not only the Brits were warned,but superciously rejected the warning.That aside the other factors as well. They then refused entry of the some of the remnant Jews from Nazi Germany into Israel,not only deprived them,but sent them back from the hell they managed to escape,plus interning them in Cyprusn like criminals! And as you say this was Britain's contribution to humanism--NOT!

  • 463. 0 0
    #439 Eli of Berkley
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:40

    Yeah yeah yeah. Another Jew blaming everything on someone else and not taking responsibility for themselves. Eli the UK had nothing to do with the holocaust. Jews were sent to Cyprus as a response to the King David Hotel. But that bit doesn't fit into your vicytim state version of the world does it? Nevermind you stay safe in California.

  • 462. 0 0
    #410 Hey Ballistic
    • Smadar
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:18

    Beauty is within the eye of the beholder. Every culture has its own sense of what constitutes beauty.

  • 461. 0 0
    # 429 "Dubi", anyway, I feel really flattered that.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 20:02

    ....you guys seem to "fear" my influence here so much (why else would you feel the need to apply your "dirty little tricks"...:) Is your moral position really that weak...??? But calm down, "buddy", the few thousand people who read Haaretz Talkback will not change the Israeli political landscape. So (unfortunately) I won't be able to bring right-wing Israel down to its knees. But I surely will keep on trying...:)

  • 460. 0 0
    Labarse # 434
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:59

    As someone who objects to what you claim as the Jewish exploitation of the Holocaust - please be kind enough to refrain from bringing the Palestinian conflict into every single talkdback subject that have nothig to do with this issue. Having said that - Jewish Holocaust survivors on the Exodus and other ships were not demanding the takeover of England, nor bombing their citizens daily, not blowing them up in the streets of London. The British refusal to allow them into Palestine was part of their draconian laws to limit Jewish immigration while continuing to frely allow immigration of Arabs from the entire region into Palestine. They disragrded the fact that these were survivrors of the war and the Holocaust with total coldheartedness. Stick to the issue - or else I will take you back to the British oppressive behaviour towards both blacks ad the boers (whom the british placed in concentration camps) in good old apartheid south africa - instigated as you know primarily by the British!

  • 459. 0 0
    # 332 David Israel..Pos iste? Kala?...But don'r think that ..
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:57

    David On the subject of Eleltherios Venizelos: My great grand father met him and had a meeting with him at the time Elestherios Venizelos. I heard this listening as child from my mother and it stuck in my mind. Wondrous thing is a child?s memory.I asked my mother about it when I read yours yesterday and she said:Where did you hear this ?And I reminded her about a long time ago listening to adult convesations.She then said:Oh yes,you naughty girl you were listening hmmm. In brief David my grand father and my grand mother both spoke fluent greek.Mine is just a few words I had picked here and there.. Seeing yours brought it mind..

  • 458. 0 0
    Haaretz is Anti-British
    • L A
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:49

    Haaretz is constantly dragging up things about the British and Israel, that have no credence, and reporting them in such away as to make the UK seem as all it has on its agenda is anti-Israel. G W Bush is now in his second term, yet the fact that he has not visited Israel is not mentioned. I was born in the UK, and lived there for 27 years. Went to a school where we were 40 Jews amongst 600 pupils I never experienced any discrimination. My surname makes it obvious I'm Jewish. I can only conclude, that Haaretz thinks the 1948 fight with the Brit's is not over. I would like to remind Haaretz that the British Foreign Secretary is a Jew. The last leader of the Conservative party Micheal Howard is Jewish, and if his party would have won the election the UK would have had a Jewish Prime Minister, and HRH's sister is married to a man with a Jewish background. Lay of it Haaretz, this cheap gutter style press to gain a headline is beneath you.

  • 457. 0 0
    Labarse # 426
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:47

    But you don't mind bonny C's friendship with the royal family in Saudi Arabia - you know where 19 year old rape victims get punished with lashes and jail terms for entering a car with a non-relative male. You're the perfect example of the pseudo liberals that constitue the usual Israel gangbashers.

  • 456. 0 0
    Harry Potter Don`t get exited about LAB and LINTH
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:47

    Harry Potter Don`t get too exited about LAB-Harass and Linth-Twit they are self-contained in a Haartez experiment we are conducting here in Israel. Yes, Yes, we still have that Lack-Of-Shame here, just wonderful how you can release her and she comes back every time, and every day, to the Haartez experiment center! One of our conclusions done by the Haaretz experiment center is that the ones with brains leave the facility when the door is open, the ones with less brainpower just stay and stay and continue with the experiment, but we don?t care better having the coped up here then having them out their where their ideas could be revolutionary! Goodbye Harry tell Professor Dumbeldor that he will have his yearly report of the long-term psychological evaluation we are doing here in the Haaretz experiment center!

  • 455. 0 0
    e-mail
    • abc
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:43

    tell israelinsider w won't let me read the comments. Guess he figured giving zebulon an opportunity for big ag deals would be eough to keep me inline.well,I need online.go do nice-nice

  • 454. 0 0
    #432 eliyahu
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:33

    you wrote-----"Isn`t it nice, LABHRAS, to be given space here by a Jewish news organization so that you can insult Jews day in and day out?" Well if you consider condemning the 40+year brutal occupation of the Palestinian People as "Anti Semite" then so be it.I personally find the term "Anti brutality" more accurate. BTW not sure if you noticed that the address is "www" that means World wide Web. We in Ireland invite you to visit any sites that are discussing even one "UN Resolution" condemning Irelands ill treatment of another People. It is you that has to try to defend the indefensible.End the occupation and I will most assuredly leave you be.Cannot imagine what I would have in common with a supporter of the criminal activities of Israel.

  • 453. 0 0
    ChanahS # 397
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:22

    http://www.wymaninstitute.org/ articles/2004-04-flagisborn.php In the above link I found that the exodus after being intercepted off israeli shores was returned to Marseille (where it departed from). The survivors refused to disembark and the ship was then sent to Germany where the brits diesembarked them by force. They were then sent to Displaced Persons Camp in Germany. The article does not mention Dachau but I am sure to remember that where they were sent. I also found that the 600 survivors on board the SS Ben Hecht had the same fate but were jailed in Cyprus.

  • 452. 0 0
    the irish catholics murdered charles's uncle
    • papal bull
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:21

    lord mountbatten.charles does not mind visiting the irish.

  • 451. 0 0
    England
    • Uzi
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:13

    Cheese, I hope Israel loses the soccer match againts Russia so the wonderful English can stay out of it. Ha ha ha ha

  • 450. 0 0
    #432 Yeah, yeah, Chanah, blah, blah
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:04

    I direct your attention to a more recent 'replay' of King David to Lebanon, where Zionists told the villagers to leave and promptly killed large numbers in their fleeing raggidy trucks along with bombing any roads they could use, not to mention those poor folks who had no transportation. Likewise, you give a 30 minute warning for King David. How do you know everybody heard it or believed you guys could be so barbaric to your BENEFACTOR! You just keep on making useless distinctions, but it appears you are running out of em. Israel is a terrorist state and should be designated as one and would be if not for the US, who many around the world indicate is in the same according to opinion polls the US herself has done. Carry on, as you continue to be quite busy slinging buckets of BS hoping some will stick. BTW; you need a new header; that one is stupid. Regards.

  • 449. 0 0
    Chris Linthwaite # 348 and Remembrance
    • Eli
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:03

    "we know what Israelis feel about the UK and we will remember". Linthwaite. We also remember the thousands of holocaust survivors who were turned back by the ugly Brits from the shores of what is now Israel back into Cyprus or into the ovens of the Germans. We also remember the raids to disarm our settlements, leaving us defenseless and at the mercy of the butchering Arabs where thousands of us were massacred. As vengeance, you got the Queen and Charlie as a punishment. The punishment is not over. It continues by the flood of Islamo-fascists in your country until they take over and make you bow to Allah or get butchered in his name.

  • 448. 0 0
    L A B H R A S haven?t you heard the News
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:01

    Labhras haven?t you heard the news Palestinians are killing Palestinians in Gaza, just cover your eyes and put some muffs on your ears, and don?t speak of it a word! Hello Labhras who rattled you up in the cage this morning!

  • 447. 0 0
    L A B H R A S haven?t you heard the News
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 19:00

    Labhras haven?t you heard the news Palestinians are killing Palestinians in Gaza, just cover your eyes and put some muffs on your ears, and don?t speak of it a word! Hello Labhras who rattled you up in the cage this morning!

  • 446. 0 0
    Silvienne re PETERSM (#366) Do Give It a Rest
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:52

    Silvienne Do Give It a Rest, for all what Peter has written in post #58 is TRUE! Do your checking around, go places it is all carved in stone and blood!

  • 445. 0 0
    Silvienne re PETERSM (#366) Do Give It a Rest
    • Gil
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:51

    Silvienne Do Give It a Rest, for all what Peter has written in post #58 is TRUE! Do your checking around, go places it is all carved in stone and blood!

  • 444. 0 0
    the best thing writen by L A B H R A S
    • Labhras's admirer
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:47

    Aw his mammy's folks in Derry are so preshus to him...he wants to know ... 'How are they all in Derry.' it must be connected with '`It will bite you in the derryaire.` i mean, innt he cute??????? even if he dont shower much you cant smell him from hear

  • 443. 0 0
    A foolishlishly overblown issue
    • Tosefta
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:46

    "Alderton asked is it "safe to assume there is no chance of this visit ever actually happening?" Alderton noted, "Acceptance would make it hard to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH [Prince Charles] to help burnish its international image. In which case, let's agree a way to lower its expectations".. Some [Jewish] community leaders asked to comment have stressed Prince Charles' fondness for the community and Jewish matters" - Haaretz The last quoted sentence shows that Prince Charles is no anti-Semite. The reason for not having an official Royal visit is obviously political, and has to do with the current Israeli-Palestinian issue. As I noted in #297, no British Monarch visited South Africa during Apartheid days. There were visits shortly before and shortly after that regime, so obviously the British have a consistent policy here. The visit is not up to Prince Charles; no doubt, Queen Elizabeth and the British government will veto it.

  • 442. 0 0
    Honestly, Do We Care About His Highness?
    • Jane
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:46

    Let's get real and stop being overly sensitive. I don't give a rat's ass what Charles or anyone else thinks about Israel or the Jewish people as long as they don't attack or hurt Jews in any way. As the old saying goes "sticks and stones..." Besides, Charles isn't exactly the go to guy for common sense or good behavior now is he.

  • 441. 0 0
    Chanah S # 397
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:46

    I believe that I am right, though I am not sure all were sent to Dachau. After the ship returned to Marseille (France) and though many french were providing them food the ship could not leave (blocked by the brits). The situation became dramatic on board and they had no choice than disembark. The brits then sent them to Dachau whrw space was available. Too bad all my documents regarding that story are far away in Paris, but I will try to check.

  • 440. 0 0
    434- Labhras and Irish war heroes
    • peter
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:42

    aha he's managed to raise his head up off the bar ans post in a stupor. care to tell us about the valiant Irish war heroes that emlisted with the Nazis.... come now you have avoided talking about your relatives for months now. Tell us about them...the source of your rabid anti-semitism. Stalag 301, to jog your memory. oh yeah...remember there's much much more to discuss, just waiting for you on some basics. By now many folks know your background so you can discuss it with them....to allay your fear.

  • 439. 0 0
    # 433 DINO "...answer that should satisfy..."
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:41

    Sir, It did not. How does she distinguish between "good" and "bad" Jews? May be she thinks all Jews are right wingers - and consequently can not stand them all as it was in your original statement. Do you understand difference between "can not stand" and "dislike". It is very interesting trait (not be able to stand (right wing) Jews) that transmits with mother milk. Kindly enlighten.

  • 438. 0 0
    # 429 "Dubi", it's really an "accident" that you are....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:36

    ...online exactly the same time as "Ya'akov", right...??? But couldn't you at least try to vary your style of writing JUST ONCE....??? Come on, "buddy" from Jerusalem, do you really have to make yourself a Talkback "laughing stock"....??? :)

  • 437. 0 0
    424 Ballistic
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:35

    ChanahS doesnt tell people that the decision to imprison illegal immigrants within the then Palestine in Cyprus was a direct response to the attack on the King David Hotel. Up to this point, those Jews who had reached Israel were to all intents and purposes allowed to remain because the british were leaving anyway. It is all here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing It is accepted fact that women were killed in the King David Hotel, ChanahS just doesn't want people to realise that Israel is a state founded on Terrorism, an accepted fact that terrorists were allowed to join government and the military. Yet if Palestinians do this they are villified. That is the double standards of Chanah S and her ilk. Jews can establish a state through terrorism, the Palestinians should not be allowed to. Desperate to make sure the idea doesn't stick, thats all.

  • 436. 0 0
    Let him play Polo in Saudi Arabia
    • Daniel
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:21

    Why on earth are we pursuing the unwanted approval from an English Monarch? Let history judge them for their actions (and inactions).

  • 435. 0 0
    lakshmi - do you post in presence of male relative?
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:19

    Did you guess the second question?

  • 434. 0 0
    #414 channah S and alleviating suffering
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:10

    You wrote-------"Of course the British had nothing to do with the Holocaust - but they also did nothing to stop it or to alleviate the suffering of its victims." Here is a sample of Israels heroes alleviating Palestinian suffering. Ben-Gurion, quoting General Avner, briefly referred in his war diary to the 'rumours' that the army had 'slaughtered 70-80 persons.' What happened was described a few days later by an Israeli soldier-witness to a Mapam member, who transmitted the information to Eliezer Pra'i, the editor of the party daily Al Hamishmar and a member of the party's Central Committee. The party member, S. (possibly Shabtai) Kaplan, described the witness as 'one of our people, an intellectual, 100 percent reliable.' The village, wrote Kaplan, had been held by Arab 'irregulars' and was captured by the 89th Battalion (8th Brigade) without a fight. 'The first [wave] of conquerors killed about 80 to 100 [male] Arabs, women, and children. The children they killed by breaking their heads with sticks. There was not a house without dead,' wrote Kaplan. Kaplan's informant, who arrived immediately afterwards in the second wave, reported that Arab men and women who remained were then closed off in their houses 'without food or water.' Sappers arrived to blow up the houses. 'One commander ordered a sapper to put two old women in a certain house ... and to blow up the house with them. The sapper refused ... The commander then ordered his men to put in the old women and the evil deed was done. One soldier boasted that he had raped a woman and then shot her. One woman, with a newborn baby in her arms, was employed to clean the courtyard where the soldiers ate. She worked a day or two. In the end they shot her and her baby.' The soldier-witness, according to Kaplan, said that 'cultured officers ... had turned into base murderers and this not in the heat of battle ... but out of a system of expulsion and destruction. The less Arabs remained--the better. This principle is the political motor for the expulsions and the atrocities

  • 433. 0 0
    # 415 17, I have an answer that should satisfy.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:06

    ....both of your questions: My dear "mum" doesn't like ALL the right- wingers of this world, be it Swiss, Christians, Jews or Muslims.... So I really think she (we) should deserve your final "absolution"...:) Right...???

  • 432. 0 0
    Isn't it nice, LABHRAS, to be given space here
    • Eliyahu
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:06

    by a Jewish news organization so that you can insult Jews day in and day out? You are an example of what some of us call anti-Semite while others as anti-Jewish racist and still others as a neo-soc.

  • 431. 0 0
    Ballistic still can't read 424
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 18:05

    Actually I stated quite clearly that it was and was considered a terrorist attack and condemned by the JEwish mainstream. What I objected to was Linthwait'es misrepresentation of the facts. It was not an attack on woman and childrena nd he cannot prove his libelous claim. My connection to Livni or any other political stream is in your mind only, as you have a tendency to try to intimidate people by identifying them with people you consider as worthless. I right in my name only. You have now idea (as you keep proving) how and for whom I vote, yet have the gall to make unfounded assumptions about a lot of issues you know squat about.

  • 430. 0 0
    Linthwaite 413
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:58

    Firstly you have no idea what I think about the bombing of the KD hotel - I just cannot tolerate untruthful and misleading representations of the event. Secondly - Stern and Irgn were resistence organizations that used terrorist tactics and at the same time were condemned by the JEwish mainstream - a fact you prefer to ignore. Israel became independent these groups were disbanded and hey blended into the mainstream political system. The IDF became with country's military wing, consisting of and representing all Israelis, regardless of cred, color or political view. What exactly are you trying to prove? When your governemtn apologizes for keeping holocaust survivors behind barbed wire for over a year in Cyprus then perhaps you can deman an apology for this instance (which by the way may have had less serious consequences if your people had taken the warning they received more seriously).

  • 429. 0 0
    Dino the Swiss - I have read your reply to ya'akov
    • Dubi
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:56

    and I think you should be a bit more respectful. He made good points about you, things that what you call the regulars here have noticed a long time, especially your arrogance exhibited towards Jews in general and Israeli Jews in particular. You may try to appear pleasant, but the subtext of your posts is clear to us all. Go and play in other people's courts. Why come here to insult Israeli Jews about matters that you appear to know very little other than the need to insult Jews?

  • 428. 0 0
    # 226 Richard S..Clickfool and the Stars of David in his eyes
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:50

    Indeed yes Richard He must have visions and prepares his day on what masterpiece he will produce to denigrate Israel.I too thank him for his endeavour,for by constantly being here at Haaretz,he does us more positively than negative. On thought crossed my mind,and that is how his poor wife feels about his obsession? And by what name does she call him?Not dear Clicky,but perhaps(Jim,Jhon,Brian,Samuel,Robert,and so many more to choose from).I am really intrigued to know this bit of info'from our dear Clickfool.But bless his heart,he is doing a sterling job for the Palis(he thinks)whereby the opposite is true as one Paleatinian from Hebron said a couple of forums ago,and named him as one who should just leave it be,for he does more damage than help the Palestinians who are doing quite well working side by side with settlers(some ar a bit difficult)but,on the whole very amenable,and they can work,make a good living.Problems began when Arafat had sent his thugs for trouble

  • 427. 0 0
    #414 Chanah S
    • Harry Potter
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:33

    Chanah S Do you have a thing for the nether regions of the human body. Labh-arse----Linth-twat. What weird taste you have.

  • 426. 0 0
    prince Charles and clear vision
    • Labhras
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:30

    Well done Charlie boy.Give not one morsel of support to the Apartheid State of Israel. Deny them the "Love " they crave. Just like a bunch of silly kids who have had their pocket money withheld.

  • 425. 0 0
    THIS QUESTION IS A MAGNET FOR FOOLS
    • Ho Lee Fok
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:30

    Be happy that he is not going to Israel if you are Israeli.The man has said he wants to be a " tampon" he talks to plants and his first wife played second fiddle to a horsey looking andreoid.No other country wants him,the British don,t want him either.Clickfool and the rest of the primates who post on this site can keep him.

  • 424. 0 0
    #400 Say Chanah
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:30

    Your post provides the laugh of the day? You are Livni's propaganda mistress who always twists history to "his story" not relevant to anything that went on. I see you are still trying to convince Linthwaite that King David was not a zionist terrorist attack. My, what a tangled web we weave when one attempts to make BS credible. I saw your other feigned indignation on the Pope thread; I answered; don't know if it will show up, but as usual I had to respond to your BS. Carry on, carry on. Regards.

  • 423. 0 0
    # 392 appreciative..WITH LOVEAND IRONY..I SAY..
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:28

    appreciative Whether Linthwaite or Clickfool. I say:My Love for Israel never diminishes ever.T The irony is some here who denigrate OUR SETTLERS and forget that according to the many Arab states who surround our Dear Country, think we are not supposed to be here at all. Something for the naysayers to contemplate. We have the likes of Tzfonit in Ben Ami as an example--forgetting that she too is concidered a settler.Think about it Tzfonit before wishing malodorous sentiments. No,you are confused in your presumption that the so-called settlers are the bane of Israel? I beg to differ and you should give it a further thought if you can and desist in demonizing them at every turn,for you are a settler no less.The whole of Israel is a one giant settler enterprise(if one has the mentality of Arabs that is)who seem to think so.Shame on the ones who adhere to this false concept...I still bless you,but with "irony"..

  • 422. 0 0
    ChanahS and Linthtwat regarding the British during the Holocaust
    • Ronen Bergman
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:27

    When hundred of thousands of European Jews asked to find refuge from the Nazis not in Britain but in Eretz Israel then under British control they were refused entery by the British authorities and by so doing Britained ensured their mass murder. This was Briain's contribution to the well being of humanity, if Jews in British eyes are considered humen that is.

  • 421. 0 0
    #414 Chris Linthwaite
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:21

    Sir, I am afraid there is gross misconception - Nobody needs Charles anywhere, nobody needs to convince British, the occupiers of Palestine, on Jewish rights and,sadly, nobody needs you here, though of course you are not precluded from... PS. Probably you look soo Jewish that your Christian fellows do not accept you and you waste your time on perversity of anti-semitic rants on Jewish site. My advice - Buddism is the way.

  • 420. 0 0
    # 412, by the way "Ya'akov"/"Ruti", a little tip for you......
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:08

    ....from Switzerland: If you wanna play "little games" next time, try at least to vary your style of writing. The "insiders" here will remember very well who you are, even if you didn't post for a few months.... As I said, only a little tip for you. And that even for free...:)

  • 419. 0 0
    HRH Chuck
    • Steve
    • 17.11.07
    • 17:01

    This is the debate in Chuck's mind. Do I go to Israel or don't I go to Israel? Oh I don't know...I'll ask mummy. I here when he is hosin' Camilla he's thinkin' 'bout Borat's wife in Kazakhstan...but that is for a different article. P.S. Where can you get a good Yorkshire Pudding in Israel?

  • 418. 0 0
    PalBrit
    • markinlondon
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:59

    Famously antisemitic words are 'some of my best friends are Jewish'. We all know that, especially given this posting of yours: Makes you wonder why on earth any Jews remain in the UK doesn`t it? Or does it? The Fat Cats are more comfortable there than in the Homeland the world gave them. You're a very bad liar and a worse debater.

  • 417. 0 0
    216 Chet,and Ballistic,greetings! Do look at that
    • lakshmi
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:58

    in Globalresearch.ca,most instructive!Regards. Chet,the trend now is placing the shoa & the nabka together for historical study,in all the schools of thought,most notably post-modernism & cultural studies. I recently came across Dr.Abu Sitta's 10 year study Atlas of Palestine & was stunned by its depth & detail.It can be found in the reference section of any decent university library.All you need to know about the event

  • 416. 0 0
    # 412 "Ja'akov", "Ruti", or whoever you are.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:52

    ....maybe it's time for YOU to come out of the closet and start posting again under your real name...:) I am not going to "out" you now, but I am looking forward to the day when you will have the courage again to use your "original" name. Cheers.

  • 415. 0 0
    DINO - it's getting interesting ...
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:43

    Sir, So your prior statement "My mother can not stand Jews" meant "she can not stand (right wing) Jews." [:)- quite clumsy] It is nice- you are trying to modify the simple truth. It is the wholly new Universe...:) Couple of questions: 1.How does she know right-wing Jew? Let say, 2 81 years old Jewish man in Zürich street ? 2.Can she stand swiss right wingers? British? French? Italian? PS. 17 years old? I wish...:) Non nacqui in Italia

  • 414. 0 0
    Linthtwat #404
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:23

    Of course the British had nothing to do with the Holocaust - but they also did nothing to stop it or to alleviate the suffering of its victims.

  • 413. 0 0
    #405 ChanahS Who is squirming not me
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:21

    The Israeli people voted into power the people who perpetrated this act of terrorism, which killed many civilians, amongst them women and children. Israel is a state built on terrorism you might not like me telling you that but it is the truth. Stern and Irgun were classified by my government as terrorists, and the act of the King David Hotel was a terrorist act. It is you who is squirming over the facts of this particular event of mass murder perpertrated by the father of the Israeli foreign Minister Livni. ChanahS I said it earlier you think that the mass murder at King David Hotel was an act of liberation. We are taught in the UK it is an act of terrorism. You think you is right I know I is right. Either way until the State of Israel apologise for this act of terrorism there will never be any official visits by the British Royal Family. That is the point I am making and the point I am sticking to.

  • 412. 0 0
    Swiss, it is not right wing Jews that you seem to dislike, you
    • Ja'akov ben-Israel
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:15

    attach to people you don't like (those who challenge you without you being able to properly respond to them) as right wing Jews and the you don't like them. But I suspect, actually I much more than suspect that your negative obsession with Jews and the Jewish nation-state of Israel is derived from the fact that you simply dislike Jews. I suggest you come out of the closet and say so, first to yourself and then to the rest of us. The arrogance that you keep exhibiting is simply nauseating!

  • 411. 0 0
    Palestinian Brit # 377 - Now that you have had your break for
    • Avraham
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:10

    which you asked, what have I written in my post 369 that was factually not correct? Or is it that you needed a break from reading about reality and not only wishful thinking? The English and then the British have had a long history, sadly, of dealing with the Jews in a certain way that has caused many, many of us to perish. The one thing I must say, the British have not been the only ones in so doing. We continue to be targetted to be mass murdered daily, this time by your people.....!!!

  • 410. 0 0
    Hey Smadar
    • ballistic
    • 17.11.07
    • 16:03

    How about if I send you my glasses!!! Israel is known for many things, but I am afraid that is not one of them. Charles would have been very safe. Regards.

  • 409. 0 0
    Haaretz.My Post to #157 The Equalizer+Clickool.PUT OUT!!!
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:51

    That was yesterday,and you were remiss in putting it out.Now rectify this,and if you are stupid and put this complaint instead,then I shall be obliged to re-write it. Save me the bother.. T.Equalizer +Click What I had said in my post to you and particularly Clicky,was the fact you mentioned the word "anachronism".You see on another forum sometime ago,Clickfool had commented thus:Anyway who cares about "Monarchy"it is an Anachronism.And yet he belligerently begin by being offensive by saying:gimme,gimme,gimme! What was that comment about? Anyhow to the point.Indeed yes,Lady Diana Spenser had more in her "little pinky"by far with class than Charles could ever have. On the point of giving him the boot,well,he will never be king,and he knows it. Further than that it is useless to give it much thought whether he comes to Israel(which I would not recomend)or not...

  • 408. 0 0
    Yes, Britain has become the base of European neo-soc.
    • Charles
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:44

    They often find their ideological home at "respected" publications such as the Guardian, the New Statesman and even the London Review of Books.

  • 407. 0 0
    # 376 17, your "mum" must be in good shape.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:37

    17, I'm afraid I wasn't specific enough earlier, my beloved "mum" just doesn't like (right-wing) Jews, as you can see from my posts here, it's clearly the mother-milk..... By the way, if I consider your age (17), your "mum" was not in Italy when she gave birth to you...???...I think the oldest "mum" there gave birth at the age of 66...:) With the help of a famous doctor whose name I unfortunately don't remember anymore... It wasn't yours, right...???

  • 406. 0 0
    # 392 # A PRIMATE SPEAKS
    • C.Himpy
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:36

    Thanks for reminding us that even a primate can get a look in on this forum.Your piece was enthralling.

  • 405. 0 0
    Linthwaite apologize - #2 misleading
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:34

    Stop aquirming Linthtwat - who were te women and children killed in the incident - you intentionally wrote that to mislead the public - it was not an attack on women and children in a market , but on the wing of the Kd hotel that housed the British military. The The 15 Jews and 40 Arabs killed may have been hotel staff or people working with the british military command. In addition, a warning was sent but totally ignored. It was also an act condemned by the Jewish political mainstream. So please stop insinuating things that are not there.

  • 404. 0 0
    #392 apreciative
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:32

    Your welcome Doesn't affect other aspects of my life. In fact on Thursday night I had a meal with Tony Blair, Alan Johnson, John Prescott and Jeremy Caborn. Tony assured me that the Americans are 100% behind a two state solution and he has George Bush and Dick Cheney's word on the matter. So yes you can say I have an input greater than just a few lines at Haaretz. ps it was at the KC Stadium in Hull on Thursday night if you want to check. Do you condemn terrorism from wherever it comes. Do you also accept that the UK had nothing to do with the Holocaust. Or do you wish to rewrite history?

  • 403. 0 0
    Good one boycott @ 386
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:28

    "British society is not organised on racial lines"

  • 402. 0 0
    386 Boycott
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:27

    I don't care a damn, and this uncles daughter who lives in Israel cares even less. Just setting the record straight - is that a reason to get nasty?

  • 401. 0 0
    HRH and refusal to visit
    • europa
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:24

    It's hardly surprising that Prince Charles could not contemplate an official visit to Israel because of its state sponsored oppression and violence. When a shred of humanity is demonstrated to the those whose lands are illegally occupied by settlers and their supporters - maybe people will look differently at Israel.

  • 400. 0 0
    Sylvienne 366
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:22

    if you knew anything about history you would know this is somewhat true. You have demonstrated a serious lack in the knowledge of history and the understading of historcal process on several levels and in all most all subjects. Obviously your opinions are based on propoganda rather than on well thought out opinions based on fact.

  • 399. 0 0
    Sylvienne 365
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:20

    "They are so conveniently forgetting that it was partly Britain who gave them their state-also stipulating that a Palestinian state should be created also as you probably know" And as you know, the Jews in Palestine accepted the partition plan while the Arabs did not, prefering to attack the fledgling state of Israel in the hope of destroying it. After constantly resisting independence, refusing to solve the issue of a Palestinian state and repeatedly over the years attacking Israel at every opportunity for any excuse, it annoys me when the Palestinians cry "we're the victims" even as the send missiles into Israel (collective punishment on innocent civilians) daily and keep attacking the border crossing, thus shooting themselves in their own feet.

  • 398. 0 0
    Chris Linthwaite Part 2
    • Daybreak
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:20

    As to your comment to Chanah that the barbed wire was a "nice touch": the British sent Jewish refugees from the Nazis who attempted to to reach Palestine to detention camps where they were "interned behind barbed wire." (Hamilton, God, Guns, and Israel, Sutton, 2004, p. 231). Churchill himself opposed keeping them behind barbed wire, and his private secretary, John Martin, warned against imprisoning them in a "British Dachau." (Segev, One Palestine, Complete, Holt, 2000, p. 459). Nice touch from Mr. Martin.

  • 397. 0 0
    Philipe # 363 I think you are mistaken
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 15:11

    My mother's brother came to Israel on the SS Exodus - they were incarcerated in Cyprus for over a year.

  • 396. 0 0
    #389 Chris Linthwaite
    • Daybreak
    • 17.11.07
    • 14:57

    Christopher Sykes, a British author, wrote that the British restrictions on immigration of Jews to Palestine in the 1939 White Paper "limited yet further what little opportunity existed for Jewish escape from Nazi tyranny." (quoted in Tessler, History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Indiana U. Press, 1994, p. 246). Jews who attempted to reach Palestine during this period to escape the Nazis came on overcrowded boats, with insufficient provisions, water, and sanitary faciliities." (Segev, One Palestine, Complete, Segev, Holt, 2000, p.458). A British official ordered one such boat returned to the high seas after misleading Churchill about its seaworthiness. (ibid., pp. 459-460). It sank. All but one of its 769 passengers died. During this same war period, the Jewish Agency gave British authorities a list of 134,000 Jews in Palestine who wanted to serve in the British army. This was one out of every two men of military age and 20,000 women. (ibid., p. 450).

  • 395. 0 0
    avraham, albert - neo-socialists: who are they can you write
    • david
    • 17.11.07
    • 14:37

    more about them please? Here in Canada there is a similar trend among "leftists", but in order to be part of it you must be either an islamist or an anti-semite. I am a socialist but neither one of the other two. Is this also the trend in europe?

  • 394. 0 0
    The Tragedy of the antisemite
    • H
    • 17.11.07
    • 14:20

    So King Abdullah visits the Royals. A nineteen year old girl is raped 14 times by 7 men and is awarded 200 lashes and 2 months imprisonment for enetering an unrelated person's car. Yes this is Saudi Arabia, friend to the Prince. It's almost a compliment to think that Charles won't be visiting Israel. Please everyone, it must be obvious to all by now that there are permanent visitors to this blog whose sole aim in life is to despise Jews. So let them.They are parasites and cannot exist without negative response. There is no real logic in racism. A failed actress, a scrounger (Shnorrer) reliant on our handouts etc.. leave them to their problems and don't respond. Do you really think you can affect their thinking. We're none of us that persuasive or gifted.

  • 393. 0 0
    Avraham (369), I like your list, not fully complete of course,
    • Albert
    • 17.11.07
    • 14:05

    and particularly I like your mentioning the home of the neo-socialists in Britain, the new class of anti-semites of Europe.

  • 392. 0 0
    to chris linthwaite and the fool
    • appreciative
    • 17.11.07
    • 13:47

    thanks chris and click, from the bottom of my heart and from all other Israelis for being there. we can always count on you to read and research anything that concerns Israel and Israelis. chris and click, you are true friends, always there when ever the name Israel hits the fan. sometimes I wonder if it doesn't border on a compulsive disorder but i am not a psychiatrist to diagnose an OCD. thank you chris linthwaite and the fool for your loyalty, devotion and interest. keep it up friends. for haaretz and the forum editors you are their biggest asset. always there, always spunky, always writing. hope it doesnt interfere with other aspects of your life if they exist.

  • 391. 0 0
    # 389 # THE BRITISH WERE UNWELCOME THEN AND NOW
    • Hugh
    • 17.11.07
    • 13:40

    Quite why the British are now trying to justify their favouritism toward the arabs in 1948 is a mystery.The refusal to allow Jews to enter Palestine was anti semitism at its most disgusting.The foreign office and indeed the whole country is permeated by anti semitism.The arabs are interlopers in Palestine ariving long after the Jews and now claiming millenia of history there.Rubbish: the mandate immigration figures held by the British show how arabs immigrated from all over arabia to get work with the British and with Jews on Kibbutzim.The fantasy of a group of arabs called Palestinians is just that,a perverse fantasy.Nobody wanted the British in 1948 and nobody wants big ears to visit Israel now: lets hope the old "tampon" and his hag stay in the UK.

  • 390. 0 0
    The Prince Won,t Visit Beit Jala
    • Lou Knee
    • 17.11.07
    • 13:28

    The Arabs of Beit Jala and Nablus etc. must feel forgotten by the wily Prince.If he were to visit these privileged arabs who live in a country with an excellent health service and a fine democracy big ears might have to return to the blighted isle and report on what he had seen.He would have seen that arabs are not disadvantaged in Israel and it is not an apartheid state like the majority of the arab countries.Lebanon refuses to allow arabs who have been resident there for years the opportunity to study and bans them from 73 professions.The whining arabs who persistently lash out at Israel in a knee jerk fashion are amongst the most privileged in the world.Palestinian Brit knows that,knows that there can be peace tomorrow,knows that he would easily find work in Israel or help setting up a business in Beit Jala.Palestinian Brit knows that Israel and the arabs are in fact best friends and could have a great future were it not for politicians and some absurd sense of pride.

  • 389. 0 0
    #357 ChanahS
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 13:10

    If everyone is in denial why did Benyamin Nethanyahoo celebrate the attack on the King David Hotel. I think this time you are being economical with the truth. As for the UK putting people in internment camps for attempting to enter Palestine illegally. Nice little embellishment you put there holocaust survivors indeed they were. They were also illegal immigrants. Is it designed to garner sympathy especially the barbed wire nice touch that. 91 people died at the King David Hotel Chanah and 45 were injured. Including 28 British and 41 Arabs and perversly 17 Jews Yet you expect us to believe that every single one of them was in the military. Who is embellishing now Chanah? Selecting facts in history does your argument no favours, I suggest you read some books. And I will tell you again Israeli Jews cannot blow British citizens up in terrorist attacks,(including women and children) and not apologise and expect things to carry on as normal

  • 388. 0 0
    Anti-semitism - or anti-Israel? 378
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 17.11.07
    • 12:25

    Actually I have lots of Jewish friends - left wing of course! However, as I have lived under ISRAELI occupation for the past umpteen years, I think I have a right to complain, and speak from personal experience. Come over here and see for yourself. I guess all you have to complain about in London is the weather!

  • 387. 0 0
    #348
    • Moshe
    • 17.11.07
    • 12:21

    The King David hotel bombing in July 22,1946 was an attack against the Criminal Investigation Division(police) and military command by the Irgun ordered by Menachem begin.91 people died:28 British,41 Arab,17 Jewish and 5 others.Jewish leaders worldwide,including those in Palestine,condemned the attack, as they should,despite the severe limitations placed on Jewish immigration to Palestine by the British and the desperate situation of the Holocaust survivors in refugee camps in Europe.

  • 386. 0 0
    #340 ChanahS and Fed-Up
    • Boycott
    • 17.11.07
    • 12:18

    "He did have a kind of great uncle (his grandmother`s first cousin) who was married to a Jewish woman." You may be right, I couldn't care less. Why are you and Fed-Up so concerned about Charles's distant relations? In the UK, non-Jews and Jews marry every day and no one thinks twice about it. It is of no interest to anyone except the families involved. British society is not organised on racial lines. British passports give nationality as 'British'.

  • 385. 0 0
    #356 Fed-Up
    • Boycott
    • 17.11.07
    • 12:04

    'Uncle' and 'great-uncle' do not mean the same. It is a different relationship. Don't you have a dictionary? Why are you so concerned about Charles's great-uncle's wife's grandfather being Jewish? Weird!

  • 384. 0 0
    Boycott about Churchill
    • WOG
    • 17.11.07
    • 11:56

    Quite right. Keep the WOGS under control. They can't be allowed to run things for themselves. They might think that they are just as good as Englishmen and that would never do!

  • 383. 0 0
    #5 POP Why would he want to visit an Apartheid state
    • Angela
    • 17.11.07
    • 11:55

    Why would the Royal Family want to welcome and shake the hand of the King of Saudi Arabia where they lash and imprison women who have been raped? The human rights abuses in many Arab countries have been well reported and documented! Before you criticise Israel look at the Arab countries where you have beheadings and executions which are carried out frequently in public. Add to this press censorship and imprisionment of opposition leaders and you have a human rights abuse tragedy. Israel is an open society everything gets reported - good and bad. Can you say that about Arab countries where there is strict press censorship? Bye the way, in case you don't know. there is no capital punishment in Israel.

  • 382. 0 0
    #28, Philippe
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 17.11.07
    • 11:36

    I would rather be shot than receive 200 lashes. From what I understand, the lashes are distributed over a number of weeks. They have a lovely system in saudi.

  • 381. 0 0
    Who cares?
    • MarkC
    • 17.11.07
    • 11:34

    That doofus and the whole worthless institution he represents would only be boosting their own reputation by coming to Israel. Let him stay home. The British monarchy will slip into obscurity in another generation.

  • 380. 0 0
    Charles
    • sweis Melbourne
    • 17.11.07
    • 11:15

    Does it mean he is not coming? BIG DEAL!

  • 379. 0 0
  • 378. 0 0
    PalBrit for crying out aloud
    • markinlondon
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:54

    (which is of course a euphemism of 'for Christ's sake) Your constant, unrelenting antisemitism has been noticed even by the most tolerant of us. Be a dear and do stop banging on and on.

  • 377. 0 0
    Avraham...give it a rest!
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:39

    "For crying out loud...." as my Grandmother would say - give it a break. All this whining about how the Jews are owed this and that from just about everyone. You have a homeland - what other race/religion has ever been given that purely for themselves....and the claims for compensation for war thefts are mind boggling - obviously Jews were not at the bottom of the pile pre-war 2 or they wouldn't have had so much to claim! The world does NOT owe you any more, and you do NOT have sole claim to Palestine. Fair shares or no deal!

  • 376. 0 0
    # 370 DINO-"And so is my dear mum (81 years !)
    • 17
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:37

    Sir, Does our charmer attract the ladies of different from your dear mum persuasion ("she can not stand Jews" as per your admission)?

  • 375. 0 0
    Maureen anne see you are an avid reader of
    • aliza
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:28

    Woman's Day as well as most of your posts show, a penchant to anti-semitic links.

  • 374. 0 0
    # 163 # THE BEST POST IN THIS SECTION WELL DONE
    • Roy Altee
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:23

    Charles has shown his fondness of vegetables by marrying someone who looks like one.He has shown his dislike of Jews and Israel by not going to the promised land preferring instead to promote organic leeks in his home country of Wales.The wily old wanker and his hag are not welcome in Israel anyway, as I have not seen one post which likened an invitation.It seems as if big ears and clickfool are two horrid peas in the same pod.Charles mentioned that he would like to be his lovers" tampon "Butt Plug as he may, sales of that product did not increase..lets hope the old root vegetable stays at home with clickfool.They can discuss Hugh of Lincoln and other anti semitic outrages in the UK.Anti semitism started way before clickfool dicovered Israel.Israel is an excuse for the flotasam and jetsum of hate to get moored.

  • 373. 0 0
    Kaffir means Nigger
    • Jy praat twak
    • 17.11.07
    • 10:09

    Same meaning: different country.

  • 372. 0 0
    peter re: Charles morals & Saudia
    • Margie in Tel Aviv
    • 17.11.07
    • 09:44

    Peter has reminded us that far from being put off by morality issues, Charles' motives are far less praiseworthy. Probably, like the rest, he goes for the money. Look at the sort of state he does grace with his royal presence: According to an AP report: A Saudi court sentenced a woman who had been gang raped to six months in jail and 200 lashes ? more than doubling her initial penalty for being in the car of a man who was not a relative, a newspaper reported Thursday. Charles has no problem at all with going there. What do you call that? A two track moral system, or just expedience? Whatever it is it reminds me of a Bell cartoon in the Guardian labelled 'the New Monarchy' with all, the Q included, bowing down to an oil barrel.

  • 371. 0 0
    THOSE BLITHERING WHINGING WHINING BRITS
    • Lou Knee
    • 17.11.07
    • 09:36

    Somewhere in it all there is a conspiracy and it is an attempt by the whinging pasty face little Englanders to rid themselves of the great marrow communicator.The only Royal who called his lover to declare that he would like to be her " Tampax "doesn,t really want to visit Israel.Well,goody goody..Strangely sales of Tampax did not increase dramatically after his mention of it and the company resisted labelling it " By Appointment " knowing that association with the vegetable chatterer would not help sales.I think Israel should foil the plot and force clickfool to invite the Right Royal wanker for tea.There they could dicuss how much they really dislike Jews,blacks,Hindus and in fact anyone who isn,t a pasty islander.Anti semitism in the UK is endemic,clickfool and the rest confirm this on a daily basis.Israel will do well without Charles or any of the rest of the family.Please stay in Wales with your leeks and coracles.

  • 370. 0 0
    # 360 Philippe
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 17.11.07
    • 09:28

    Philippe, don't underestimate his charme in certain circles. The Swiss (middle-aged) women are just crazy for him....:) And so is my dear mum (81 years !)

  • 369. 0 0
    British attitude towards us, Jews, and our nation-state, the.....
    • Avraham
    • 17.11.07
    • 09:23

    ...Jewish state of Israel, has changed little over the years. Jews mind you, all of them, were expelled from England as early as the 13th century! Jews, many Jews, lost their lives to Hitlers' thugs because the British would not permit them to return home to their ancestral homeland of Eretz Israel, only to see those very Jews later go up in smoke or shot to death in mass! The home of neo-socialism is of course Britain, an ideological movement that attempts to harmonize supposed socialism with Islamism and/or anti-Jewish racism! And now the royoal family and its attitude towards our people and its state...!

  • 368. 0 0
    responses
    • an observer
    • 17.11.07
    • 07:55

    After reading the postings in response to the Prince Charles article I can only wonder why those posters who are anti-Israel, anti-Semite or anti-Zionist bother to read Haaretz? If their scorn for all things Israeli is so intense then I imagine that perusing articles and posting responses must be a cathartic for their apparently constipated intellects.

  • 367. 0 0
    #88, ballistic to Christian...
    • Silvienne
    • 17.11.07
    • 07:02

    "As far as `making Israel look bad`, well, her actions do that, not what anybody says" And so say all of us...! Regards

  • 366. 0 0
    #58, PeterSM to Chris Linthwaite..
    • Silvienne
    • 17.11.07
    • 07:01

    Oh Peter, do give it a rest...according to you, the entire world is/has been killing Jews...

  • 365. 0 0
    #282, Michael from UK
    • Silvienne
    • 17.11.07
    • 06:58

    I have dual nationality-British and American-and grew up in London so every time I see the pro-Israel posters here insulting England I always feel the need to jump in. They are so conveniently forgetting that it was partly Britain who gave them their state-also stipulating that a Palestinian state should be created also as you probably know. It annoys me when Israel cries "we're the victims!" even as they demolish Palestinian homes and slam the West Bank into lockdown... Regards

  • 364. 0 0
    WHO CARES?
    • Stephen Connor
    • 17.11.07
    • 06:32

    Okay, granted that is a typical American reaction, but he doesn't really do anything. Blair has come to Israel many times. Prince "HRH" is kind of homely any way. How can that make anyone look good other than by comparison. Besides, if Israel wanted the Royals around, they shouldn't have blown up the King David Hotel. Peace. Steve

  • 363. 0 0
    ChanahS # 340
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 05:09

    Do you know where did the brits incarcerated the survivors on board the Exodus? Dachau. Talk about british cynicism and moralism.

  • 362. 0 0
    Alan #317 and Doo-wop #336 The Word Is KAFER
    • Eli
    • 17.11.07
    • 04:26

    or as Alan wrote Kaffir, depending how it's used. It does mean non-believer and is widely used as a derogatory term for non-Moslems, but not necessarily just blacks (blacks are called Abed, meaning slave). Depending on how Kafer or Yikfar is used it could also mean being sacreligious by committing a sin against God in a variety of ways, including lying, mentioning God's name in vain etc.

  • 361. 0 0
    Christian Van Nieker # 284
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 04:22

    Correct in your analysis. But you do not mention that in 2000 Israel gave all what the palestinians claim they want (except the destruction of Israel) and end the occupation that all israel haters claim is the cause of all world's problems. We know what the answer was.

  • 360. 0 0
    Swiss (Dino) # 37 2nd try
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 04:11

    You must be kidding. What kind of glory or fame can this obsolete monarch bring to anyone? For your other message (Jerusalem or Charles) the answer is obvious. Try to guess.

  • 359. 0 0
    realism # 25
    • Philippe
    • 17.11.07
    • 03:25

    Beats me! I never said all israelis were smart. Personally as a son (well grand grand son ) of the french revolution I could not care less for these arrogant and obsolete monarchs.

  • 358. 0 0
    Maybe....
    • Steve
    • 17.11.07
    • 03:01

    ...he doesn't want to get spit on! http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=487412&contrassID=2&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=487412

  • 357. 0 0
    Linthtwat lying again
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 02:31

    Nobody is denial the attack on the Kind David - even Virtual Jewish Library calls it a terrorist attack - but it was at a military target - the wing that was being used by the British army. So what's this British women and children bit - a nice little add-on hey Linthtwat? At the same time the Brritish were incarcerating Jewish Holocaust survivors behind barbed wire in Cyprus fro trying to reach a safe harbor on Palestinian shores.

  • 356. 0 0
    # 333 Boycott.You Are Persistent.Just read If?
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:33

    Boycott Lord Mountbatten was his great uncle,had a close elashionship with Charles(who called him affectionately Uncle Dicky)Lord Mountbatten was his mentor as well,in many aspects of his life. Do I have to repeat myself? Nevermind about Edwina,we were talking about UNCLES!You said he hadn't and I said he did. Hey,is this a game?I don't make up things as I go along you know.Have another think and come back with your one liner if you so wish.Have a good ramaging...

  • 355. 0 0
    chet from canada
    • danny
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:31

    exactly who was responsible for making israel a "nation of victims". for you to use the most despicable crime in history and then complain that the victims ie the jews use this guilt is incomprehensible.its the nations who perpetrated this crime who should feel guilty.

  • 354. 0 0
    Charles sticks to Arabs
    • peter
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:16

    The Prince goes on official tours to Jordan, Egypt, many times to Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Iraq and Iran....the Jewish State of Israel is skipped of course. 8 times to Saudi Arabia? I guess it's the price to pay for a 33 million dollar gift to Oxford. hehe no morality play for Prince Charlie when he's not allowed on some roads, kept out of some cities and of course it doesn't dismay him to visit a country where Jews are not allowed entry. morality and ethics have nothing to do with it, he knows where his bread is buttered.

  • 353. 0 0
    To POP
    • graanan315@aol.com
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:08

    If you think Israel promotes hate, you should see the vile invective against Jews and Israel in every single Arab semi-official newspaper. Raanan G

  • 352. 0 0
    Kaffir
    • doo-wop
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:04

    Actually kaffir means unbeliever and is NOT applied (in Islamic texts or by Muslims who know their texts)to Jews or Christians - they are referred to as 'people of the book' (ie Bible and Torat) or as dhaalleen, the misguided. I would imagine kaffir to have been a term that was in use amongst the locals, and that white settlers then took it up as a general derogatory term for black people (eg babu or walla amongst Anglo-Indians).

  • 351. 0 0
    #323 Dagma
    • Boycott
    • 17.11.07
    • 01:01

    Here is your Churchillian quotation with significant word in capitals. "It is manifestly right that the Jews who are scattered all over the world should have a national centre and a national home where SOME OF THEM may be reunited and where else but IN this Land of Palestine with which for more than Three Thousand years they have been intimately and profoundly associated. We think it will be good for the world, good for the Jews and GOOD FOR THE BRITISH EMPIRE." In other words, a limited number of Jews would be allowed to settle in parts of Palestine (alongside the native Arabs). They would not be allowed to have a sovereign state and Palestine would remain under the British Mandate and would be treated as part of the Empire. Churchill was not a Zionist.

  • 350. 0 0
    #315 Fed-Up
    • Boycott
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:52

    As I said, Charles has/had no uncles. If Edwina Mountbatten had a Jewish grandfather, so what?

  • 349. 0 0
    # 75 josheph theboom.That is a Nice Dutch name.Am I Right?
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:49

    Joseph I quite agree.I have never heard Prince Charles saying anything against Jews.At least not a far as I know.He did say he wanted to be called, "The Defender of Faiths"which was at the time(guess) when Princess Diana was getting all attention I believe.And yes the Brits are pro Arabs and we know why.And there is a reason for it,particularly because of the Saudis.Get it? You won't lose any sleep,nor will I...

  • 348. 0 0
    #316 ChanahS
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:49

    The bombing of the King David Hotel. Israelis are taught and in fact celebrate it as an act of liberation. In the United Kingdom it is taught in our schools as an act of mass murder. Until this is sorted out no member of the Royal family will ever visit the State of Israel. Nethanyahoo unveiled a plaque celebrating this not so long back, we know what Israelis feel about the UK and we will remember

  • 347. 0 0
    Please, how likely would Camilla give Prince Charles permission?
    • Smadar
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:45

    With Israel's high number of dynamic, outspoken, beautiful women, it's no place for an Englishman! Trust me.

  • 346. 0 0
    # 268 commonsense ....YEP!!!!!
    • Lynn
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:42

    I just wish they would stop "visiting" us.

  • 345. 0 0
    ROYALTY HAVE NOT LEARNT THE LESSON OF 1948 ??
    • Bill
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:40

    When UK's anti-semitism and treacherous actions against Jews in bowing down to oil rich arab countries demand to go back on their word and support of the Balfour declaration , preventing Jews escaping from hitler going to Israel and safety . Placing Israel and the Jewish people on the altar as sacrificial Lambs to oil greed and arab islamic hatred of Jews . RESULT - THE END OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE - SAME AS ALL EMPIRES THROUGHOUT HISTORY WHO HAVE HURT THE JEWISH PEOPLE HAVE ENDED . FULFILLMENT OF G-D'S WORD .." I WILL BLESS THOSE WHO BLESS ISRAEL AND THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND CURSE THOSE WHO CURSE THEM "..

  • 344. 0 0
    to Margie in TA
    • Judah N. Wenkel
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:35

    -YOU`ve said it best, once again !

  • 343. 0 0
    # 43 Michael..A Visit bt Charlie Would Improve Israel`s Image How
    • Fed-Up
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:32

    Michael While I agree with your response and what it contained,I would hardly call Charly boy a spoiled brat.He is too old for that appellation. On being "defender of faith"He said quite grandiloquently that he wanted to be called; "The Defender of Faiths".Hypocrite!only pandering to the bosess the Arabs natch! He has done nothing worthy.He made the life of the Beautiful Diana a misery,not only by him BUT!particularly by The Duke of Edinburgh himself.Let's face it,apart from the Queen there isn't much between any of them to admire.. They lost a lot of their prestige a long time ago from what I am told by relatives in the UK. Finally,he would not improve Israel's Image,but mey harm it with his blundering way...

  • 342. 0 0
    To Maureen Ann # 308 - No-one forgets
    • Dolly
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:24

    promises, assurances, Jewish hopes of returning to their Homeland such as Speeches made by Winston Churchill IN 1921 urging for a Jewish Homeland in Palestine the land with which the Jewish people have been intimately and profoundly associated with for more than 3000 years. The Balfour Declaration promising the Jewish people a Homeland and the League of Nations in 1922 which gave a British Mandate to prepare for a homeland for the jews...... None of these policies could be adopted with the intervention of many worldly problems at the time and then the 2nd World War entered the scene ending with the return of the Jewish people to their long-lost Homeland in Palestine from which they were exiled by the Romans two thousand years befor and the battle to fight for what was promised to them despite Arab rejections.

  • 341. 0 0
    Alan to Clicky 317
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:20

    The word kaffir means infidel.

  • 340. 0 0
    Boycott # 296
    • ChanahS
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:15

    He did have a kind of great uncle (his grandmother's first cousin) who was married to a Jewish woman.

  • 339. 0 0
    Much ado about nothing...
    • Nathaniel
    • 17.11.07
    • 00:03

    The once powerful British royal family reigned over Britain and its empire - and members of the ruling family had 'aides.' Today all that's left are a few aides, and the attention accorded them in Haaretz.

  • 338. 0 0
    Let Us All Remember...
    • Susan
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:48

    ... that the British RF doesn't get to decide these things on their own: this is a reflection of the British GOVERNMENT's attitude. And, seeing the crap in the British press about Israel, I can't say I'm surprised.

  • 337. 0 0
    To Palistinian Brit # 219 - What else, Winston Bhurchill
    • Dagma
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:42

    Hello there. Did you know that in 1921 Winston Churchill made a Speech to the Arabs [guess you do]... Quote : "It is manifestly right that the Jews who are scattered all over the world should have a national centre and a national home where some of them may be reunited and where else but in this Land of Palestine with which for more than Three Thousand years they have been intimately and profoundly associated. We think it will be good for the world, good for the Jews abd good for the British Empire".

  • 336. 0 0
    I really miss Monthy Pyton
    • Pepe
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:30

    It was the only reality show about british life that had some merits

  • 335. 0 0
    To Palestinian Brit # 219 - Prince Charles
    • Dagma
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:28

    Hello there Palestinian Brit... was back in the UK recently.... people adored Diana and so did I....Charles is our Prince, and that's all. Take care.... Regards.

  • 334. 0 0
    Clickfool a racist after all # 81
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:27

    So as far as you are concerned anyone from south africa is necessarily a racist - espeecially anyone who also is not virulently anti-Israeli. Just to indicate how far gone you are in this area - there are numerous posters to this forum who are present or former south africans - it's only those that identify themselves as such that get this kind of racist comment. You know nothing about this poster except that he is telling you that anyone calling Israel an apartheid state shows ignorance (you guys have the nerve to argue with south africans about the nature of what SA apartheid was). Ad all you can do is assail him with your inane and racist assumptions?

  • 333. 0 0
    Phil the Greek
    • thinking clearly
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:24

    Who exactly does Phil the Greek think he is? except maybe a permanent sucker up to the arabs!

  • 332. 0 0
    Michael from Greece - Kali Nichta
    • David Israel
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:24

    I am well aware of what the Turkish public thinks about Israel and it is not very friendly. However mutual interests make Israel and Turkey allies and the Turkish military has strong relations with Israel and USA. As far as their support for Arabs; after all Turkey is 99.9 % Moslem it is understandable. What is not understandable is why Greece has been and still is such a strong supporter of Palestinian Arabs, in the past allowing their terrorists organizations to have offices and training camps. And also it is hard for me personally to forget that when some of my relatives were deported from Rhodes it did not take a day for the happy Greeks of the Island to take over their properties. The Jews are not the new kid on the block in Palestine; they have been there for 5 millenniums.

  • 331. 0 0
    Clicky-the word Kaffir is a name MUSLIMS gave toUNBELIEVER BLACKS
    • Alan
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:18

    A KAFFIR IS THE MUSLIM NAME FOR A NON MUSLIM- Clicky,if you are a Christian/Jew then you are a Kaffir as well

  • 330. 0 0
    Chris Linthwaite # 2 - HUH?
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:17

  • 329. 0 0
    # 296 Bocott..Wrong...Lord Mountbatten of Burma(Great Uncle of
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 23:08

    Prince Charles,and Lord Mountbatten was his favourite.Easy for you to dismiss it out! There is more to the story.You ought to familiarize yourself with Boycott. Plus Edwina Mountbatten's whose Jewish Maternal grandfather was Sir Ernest Cassle on one of the richest and most...You will have to wait for the rest.Must away for awhile...

  • 328. 0 0
    Scott Havsy
    • Janice
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:55

    You ask what the British have ever done for the Jews?? I guess you have forgotten the Balfour Declaration.

  • 327. 0 0
    Scott Havsy
    • Janice
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:55

    You ask what the British have ever done for the Jews?? I guess you have forgotten the Balfour Declaration.

  • 326. 0 0
    For Jacob #256 and others
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:53

    It's a great pity that when you visit Israel you seem to limit your excursions only to the lunatic fringes of the population in Hebron and the occupied West Bank. It's true that these settler loonies shame us, harming both Israel and the Palestinians, and need to be dealt with soon. However, the rest of Israel proper is a fantastically vibrant and interesting and beautiful country, with a variegated, curious and friendly population, which apparently you never encounter. So the next time you come to Israel, just broaden your horizons a bit, and don't concentrate so fanatically on the lunatic fringes.

  • 325. 0 0
    #36 PeterSM. You are living in a Australia...
    • Maureen Ann
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:52

    Remember, Australia is a member of the Commonwealth! I am not a Royalist, but it is something to keep in mind Peter. By the way, what are your thoughts on the death of Diana? Even though her death was prior to 9/11, there are very elite, powerful people who would have not taken kindly to the mother of the future king of England, marrying a Muslim, Dodi Al Faed. Mohammed Al Faed is probably right in thinking there is something sinister behind the accident that killed Diana and his son, Dodi. Diana had spoken of a car accident prior to her death...

  • 324. 0 0
    Here we go again
    • Janice
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:52

    Prince Charles, as is his right, does not want to visit Israel. Maybe it is because he, as many others in the world, see Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories and confiscation of Palestinian lands as illegal and immoral acts. So, of course, Israe'ls amen corner immediately screams that the Prince is an "anti-semite." To their warped minds, anyone who does not want to genuflect to Israel and accept anything and everything that the Jewish state does must, by extension, be an "anti-semite." Strange that it is only Israel supporters who sling this spurious charge. When other countries are criticized or boycotted their supporters do not say that the critics are anti the people of that country. Only the Israeli supporters do that. It is getting really old and no one wants to buy that tired verbiage. There is true anti-Semitism in the world and Israeli policies go far in fanning those flames.

  • 323. 0 0
    after the queen killed diana
    • natan
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:50

    Liz didn't want a Muslim as a step-father to the grandkids, and took the necessary steps to make sure it didn't happen, so the royals have to avoid looking too friendly to the Jews (not that the "Windsor" family has ever been all that fond of them anyhow).

  • 322. 0 0
    #278 Don Camillo
    • Daybreak
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:45

    The British government declined any part in enforcing the 1947 UN partition plan for Palestine. They refused to allow UN officials to enter Palestine. "In the absence of British cooperation, the UN Palestine Commission was unable to begin the transitional process toward the implementation of the partition resolution." (Wasserstein, Divided Jerusalem, Yale U. Press, 2001, p. 135). Had the UN been able to implement the partition, the war might have been averted and the Palestinians would have had their state. Rashid Khalidi, the distinguished Palestinian-American scholar at Columbia, writes that the "framework through which Britain managed its occupation of Palestine...constituted a kind of iron cage for the Palestinians, from which they never succeeded in escaping." (Iron Cage, Beacon, 2006, p. 31). Your posts indicate, Mr. Camillo, that you don't understand the current situation in the ME. Perhaps that is because you haven't examined the history fully enough.

  • 321. 0 0
    Michael from Greece
    • David Israel
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:43

    I am well aware of what the Turkish public thinks about Israel and it is not very friendly. However mutual interests make them allies and the Turkish military has strong relations with Israel and USA. As far as their support for Arabs, after all Turkey is 99.9 % Moslem it is understandable. What is not understandable is why Greece has been and still is such a strong supporter of Palestinian Arabs, in the past allowing their terrorists to have offices and training camps. And also it is hard for me personally to forget that when some of my relatives were deported from Rhodes it did not take a day for the happy Greeks of the Island to take over their properties. The Jews are not the new kid on the block in Palestine; they have been there for 5 millenniums.

  • 320. 0 0
    282 Fair enough 17
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:40

  • 319. 0 0
    #115 Mehmet. Something else that some do not like to remember...
    • Maureen Ann
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:33

    or admit to; The British Royal family lost a lot of relatives, the Romanovs, during the Bolshevik revolution/invasion in Russia.

  • 318. 0 0
    Makes me proud
    • wibism
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:31

    to be a Brit. Israel toadies up to Prince Charles because it believes a visit from him would improve its image. But when he declines to visit, all of a sudden his opinion isn't worth anything. Like most of us anti-zionists, Charles has no problem with Jews. He just disapproves of Israel's behavior toward the Palestinians. Charles is a real mensch.

  • 317. 0 0
    Fed-up re Jewish relatives
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:30

    He actually has a not too distant cousin living in Israel - her mother was Jewish and she grew up in England alongside other children in the royal family - she's been living in ISrael for some 40 years - you shoud hear what she has to say about the royals - and how they treated her mother. However, all this has nothing to do with the issue - nor does the fact that bonny Charles himself may have some Jewish genes.

  • 316. 0 0
    phillippe 25
    • realism
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:26

    If, as you say, nobody outside Britain cares about that obsolete monarchy, why was he invited?

  • 315. 0 0
    Finally a man with morals!!
    • Tom
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:22

    Finally a man who is not going to bow to the power of the Jewish lobby in the U.S. and Britain. A great man and a hero for human justice.

  • 314. 0 0
    # 164 Loo Knee.CORRECT HE,S A RIGHT ROYAL WANKER
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:19

    Oh Loo Knee You made me laugh and it was a treat,thanks. Will not repeat all you said,which is ringt on, and what is all this "kerfuffle"about anyway? If he is afraid to come because he'd hurt the feelings of his patrons the "Saudis"okay.Happy to oblige you HRH and keep out of Israel and we will be happy to continue without further interference to your "cabbage patch"Now be sure to care of it and the rest of your vegetation...Thank You Kind Sir.And goodby..

  • 313. 0 0
    Prince Charles, in fact, is not liked
    • Wolf
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:12

    very much by the British themselves due to the manner he treated his young and beautiful ex-wife. He was still carrying on with Camilla while he was married to Diana, not so secretly. We, Israelis are proud of being Israelis and Jews. We have a rich heritage and we have proved our worth among the nations. We should not be perturbed if one does not agree with us, does not want to be a friend or just does not like us. Why should this bother us? It's their own loss.

  • 312. 0 0
    I can't believe that there are....
    • Nemesis
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:10

    ...281 posts thus far on this subject. Who really cares if he does or does not go???? Charles is nobody except in his own little world of pomp and ceremony.

  • 311. 0 0
    I'm afraid david # 160 may be correct with his prediction.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:05

    Israel - Russia 0-2 But not because Israelis would be "sore losers", the Russians are probably just a little bit better. Don't worry Charles, you won't be "the sucker" here....

  • 310. 0 0
    Are we so insecure that we get offended
    • Wolf
    • 16.11.07
    • 22:04

    if one doesn't want to apper too friendly with Israel, for political reasons, while we are still in conflict with the Arab world. Prince Charles is definitely not an antisemite. He is in fact a self appointed protector of all faiths and minoritiws in England and tobe an antisemite would clash with his ethos. He is a honourable man. The English are not all antisemites as some responses here like us to believe; a high proportion of thinking Englishs admire Israel and understand its problems. A large proportion of responses to Israel related articles in the media are pro-Israel. The British are a very tolerant nation and the Jew in the UK have only flourished unhindered. The ultra religious are left alone to do their own thing and the seculars are indistinguishable from the natives.

  • 309. 0 0
  • 308. 0 0
    David Israel, Turkey is not a friend of Israel
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:46

    Just because the governments are in good standing, trust me ask any Turk how they feel about Israel. They'll tell you that they are not fond of them, and even though the Palestinians and British kicked them out of Palestine, they still support the Palestinian quest for statehood and are repulsed by Israeli occupation. We here in Greece already know the truth. The Jews are the new kids on the block in Palestine. They will eventually have to give back the stolen goods. You think not? Ask everyone that's occupied them including Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Britain, etc.

  • 307. 0 0
    #281 Fed-Up
    • Boycott
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:37

    "his favorite uncle`s wife was A JEW! HA HA HA.But! Absolute truth..." The real truth is that Charles has had no uncles.

  • 306. 0 0
    #70 Margie in TA
    • Boycott
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:28

    "he publicly announced that one of his main reasons for choosing her was her virginity." That statement is simply not true.

  • 305. 0 0
    Britain is the home of neo-socialism, the movement
    • S'vetlana
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:26

    that attempts to harmonize supposed socialism with Islamism and/or anti-Jewish racism.

  • 304. 0 0
    # 277 Silvienne..Yes,But not through the Royals me dear..
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:19

    Read about it properly.The Royals are a mere decorative beings and have no say much in matters of policies,or politics. It is always carried out by the Govt who is in office and in charge.Read about this correctly I suggest...

  • 303. 0 0
    My wife and I have not been visiting Britain for several years
    • Dr. G. Solomon
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:16

    despite the fact that we used to spend time there twice a year. The reason: The high level of anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish attitude on the part of parts of its government and certain segments of its population. This latest case is yet another reason why we will not spend any money there, probably for a long time to come. P.S. In one of the posts above the poster wrote that he/she remembered how Britain participated in the death of European Jews by refusing permits to many of them who wanted to flee to Israel. He/she stated that we should not forget that attitude. Indeed, we don't forget what the Brits have done to our people!

  • 302. 0 0
    Chris Linthwaite - I would not invite him
    • David Israel
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:15

    But my understanding is that it is his wish to make an unofficial visit to the region including Turkey where he will visit the house of Virgin Mary and an organic farming site. I would say let him visit Papua New Guinea where the sun is always shining the weather is great and the beaches pristine.

  • 301. 0 0
    Hey there Silvienne, where on earth have you been?
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:14

    The pro-Pal posters missed you. Welcome back. Regards.

  • 300. 0 0
    The little aldultrous prince
    • ConnieM.
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:11

    Why should anyone be surprised by anything that happens in England concerning the Jews and Israel. We all know their history during and after the second world war and how they treated Jews in Palestine and Cyprus. That said...they have not changed their arabist ways and of course we all know what is happening in Londanstan...I personally could care less what this efete, egocentric fool says or does..his Aunt Margaret was a rabid Jew hater and I guess the genes of the "royals" are tainted in more ways than one. What a joke...King,Queen,Princes,Princesses....you have to laugh at the ridiculousness of it all. Next we will hear from Sir Lancelot and King Arthur.

  • 299. 0 0
    # 275 Michael
    • 17
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:11

    Sir, Your reasoning is reasonably reasonable. The facts, however, are exactly the same as I stated with your correct explanation of Britain's contribution. Apparently my unsuccessful attempt to jest through French saying brought unexpected reaction from you and I regret it. Of course people are similar and being a member of the "race" that was treated as inferior for thousands years I commend your attitude. We do not have an argument.

  • 298. 0 0
    # 57 thinking clearly.Charlie boy..Talking to the Plants
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:06

    thinking clearly Thanks buddy,another god one...

  • 297. 0 0
    It's the Occupation, stupid
    • Tosefta
    • 16.11.07
    • 21:05

    "The last South African Monarch to visit South Africa as sovereign was George VI in 1947, accompanied by the then Princess Elizabeth, as the following year saw the election of the pro-republican National Party. Following a referendum, South Africa became a republic in 1961, and Queen Elizabeth II would not visit the country until 1995" - Wikipedia To complete the picture, Apartheid was instituted in 1948 and ended in 1994 (first election of Mandela). There seems to be a deliberate policy here. I wouldn`t hold it against Prince Charles. When there is peace with the Palestinians, there will be Royal visits to Israel.

  • 296. 0 0
    29 Philippe and Cipora..HEY FOLKS DID YOU KNOW..
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:58

    To the both of you.Did you know they have Jewish blood in their "genes"?If I am not mistaken...If I am feel free to tell me. He also seems to think he is a descendant from The Ghengiz Khan,or some Asian wariour.Oh yes I think it was "Ghengis Himself". Scratch a little deeper,as a reminder,his favorite uncle's wife was A JEW! HA HA HA.But! Absolute truth...So,what's in a name??

  • 295. 0 0
    Prince Caharles and the Jew haters
    • Christian Van Nieker
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:55

    Well, I have read all the comments from the Jew haters, who have no idea of the truth, except what they read in DER GUARDIAN, OR OTHER ARAB NEWSPAPERS, Those who write such hate against Israel, are guilty of the worst kind of Anti Semitism, and have no real knowlege of the truth. How can Israel make peace with a bunch of murderers, who bomb Israel every day, from Gaza? Israel has shown tremendous restraint in not bombing those savages out of the world. Why Israel still supplieds the enemy with food, water, electricity, fuel etc, is a mystery. I have yet to learn of Jews murdering children. These haters seem to forget about the suicide murders of children, people in pizza shops, buses, etctec. No Israeli has ever done enything like those savages. The Islamic propaganda is brilliant. They feed minds like those haters, but they have never been to Israel. The "massacre" in jenin was typical. there was no massacre. And the lies go on and on. Believe Islamic lies. you are trash.

  • 294. 0 0
    Emails to the Prince.
    • MJ
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:55

    Could somebody plese send all these email postings to the Prince (the guy with the BAT EARS)to let him know just how much we all care for him.

  • 293. 0 0
    Prince Charles a real piece of work
    • chick
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:48

    He is alleged to dress up a la Lawrence of Arabia in the Royal Palace. It is said he considered and may still be considering becoming a Muslim. I hope he does just that.

  • 292. 0 0
    #276 Chris Linthwaite Smartass
    • PJ
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:47

    Still around ????? I thought you have already gone together with the tampax's thread to the royal places but .. second thoughts: you are actually queuing for your place together with your fellow jew-haters disguised as trendy The Guardian-fashionable-anti-israeli bashing. Enjoy the queue (a very British exercise in futility) and the trip, not to mention your destination.

  • 291. 0 0
    Swiss (Dino) # 37
    • Philippe
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:43

    You must be kidding. What kind of glory (or fame) can a visit by this obsolete monarch bring to anyone?

  • 290. 0 0
    #3Mendeleyev. A horse is a horse is a horse
    • Fed-Up
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:43

    A horse is a horse,of course,of course di,dam di dam...Who the blazes cares if he comes or NOT!

  • 289. 0 0
    Thank you Silvienne 277
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:41

    I'm not a particularly big fan of Charles either, but the caricature of him,and the UK, as some raging hotbed of anti-semitism is so ludicrous that I felt the need to defend him. Britain is far from perfect and has a very bloody history, but it always amazes me on this site how the same people who are the first to scream anti-semitism at any criticism of Israel are also the first to pour out torrents of ill-informed bigotry and hate onto the UK, over some non-story like this.

  • 288. 0 0
    Who the hell needs a monarch?
    • Lynn
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:39

    It would only be for show. I thought democracies gave that crap up long ago. A big to do over not much of anything. Jeez people he isn't your king.

  • 287. 0 0
    Looks like he hit a nerve here
    • Outsider
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:32

    The "snub" is very diplomatically worded, unlike the outgoing ambassador's little rant.

  • 286. 0 0
    274 Try to ignore your prejudices 17
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:28

    The US and USSR obviously in the long-run were the key to victory against Hitler, but if Britain had crumbled in 1940 like France, or had not entered the war to defend Poland, Hitler would have triumphed in Europe before the US and USSR even seriously considered fighting Hitler. No doubt Hitler and the USSR would have fallen out eventually, but many influential Americans, like Kennedy's father were prepared to live with Hitler. As to 'England is great the English are jerks' it's just so pathetic that I have to laugh. People are the same everywhere. You sadly seem to prefer to distinguish people in terms of good races and bad races. That's particularly sad coming from a supporter of Israel.

  • 285. 0 0
    Israel wants the brand image but without the obligations
    • Don Camillo
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:22

    HRH Prince Charles' team is morally right - Israel wants to boost its tattered and corrupt international reputation. Well, it can do very easily - end the illegal Occupation of the West Bank and abide by the many agreements it has signed up to.

  • 284. 0 0
    #269, Michael in UK...
    • Silvienne
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:19

    Thanks for your post. I don't personally like Charles much, but the idiotic ravings of pro-Israel posters here against England are rude and thoughtless. Let them remember that England was partly responsible for creating the state of Israel in the first place, and if England will not visit Israel until Israel allows the Palestinians the same as they have, a state, then that is England's position. And other countries have declared the same. Regards

  • 283. 0 0
    Oliver Masterman # 244
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:14

    Bonny Prince C has no qualms about hopping off to Saudi Arabia when summoned by the ruling sheikhs - don't they ban women from driving or from shorwing their faces in public. Isn't all the wealth in the hands of a despotic rulng family? Isn't it so that they don't even alllow JEws to enter their coutntry and non Moslems are not allowed to enter with non -Muslim bibles, crosses, any sign of religion other than Islam? What do you think happens to people arrested in Saudi Arabia for contravening these and other crimes? - torture, beheadings, etc. The difference is that SA is an oil-rich country and Israel is just a Jewish country - not much gain in that, eh? I could carry on but I think you get the gist and realize how inane your post is. The

  • 282. 0 0
    ~246 David israel
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:12

    So why invite him?

  • 281. 0 0
    C`mn - we Brits always *adored* the Arabs.
    • Lawrence of Arabia
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:08

  • 280. 0 0
    #269 Michael - little correction - victory against Hitler
    • 17
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:04

    Sir, With all due respect- The WW2 victors were the USSR and the US with variable contribution by other Allies including the UK. England is a resonably good/bad coubtry as many others. Paraphrasing " La France est belle, les francais sont cons" one can say: England is great the English are jerks." Again, you still have nice country...

  • 279. 0 0
    Olive Masterman # 257
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:03

    The answer to your question is a resounding NO! Modern anti_semitism is not different to past anti-Semitism, which has been around far longer than Zionism - which is the Jewish aspiration for nationhood. It has no connection to communism so why would you want to make one.

  • 278. 0 0
    Well done!!!!
    • Johan Cohan Mohan
    • 16.11.07
    • 20:03

    Well done Prince Charles. It's about timea statesman stood up to these beggars. That's all they ever do. Beg, beg, beg. YOu jewish people are brought up on victimhood and begging. Remember, Make Peace and then may be our lovely prince will think about it. Got it you idiots. BTW Your current prime minister is a corrupt politician and your former president, a pervert. Talk about being illiterate. Damn you hypocrites. Peace.

  • 277. 0 0
    Michael - 269. We have lots to be proud of...
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:58

    ...and there is more than a smattering of jealousy amongst this lot! Actually the Brits did more than their bit in saving the Jews, and the world, from Hitler. Not many thanks in some quarters, I notice.

  • 276. 0 0
    #255 Trumpledor
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:57

    Forgotten to take your medication today? The United Kingdom walked out of palestine and gave the keys to the UN. Israeli Jews has never I repeat never apologised for murdering British women and children. In fact Nethanyahoo celebrated a terrorist attack on The King David Hotel with a plaque. That is why Israel will never get an official royal visit. France peace treaty, Portugal peace treaty, in fact lots of peace treaties We are massive friends with the United States of America (American War of Independence). Note the difference apologies, treaties. Celebrations of terrorist attacks which killed British citizens. So if that makes me anti semetic to think that so be it. Your answer to everything I guess.

  • 275. 0 0
    moronic representative of the moronic family..
    • felix
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:51

    Israel is and will be thriving, Charlie boy is and -- apparently -- will stay a moron... We don't need morons ... 60 years after the "royal" family is proud itself on boycotting the state of Israel -- moronic inbreds!

  • 274. 0 0
    # 244 Oliver Masterman
    • 17
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:47

    "Afterall Israel ignores UN rulings, steals land and homes, shoots children, employs torture....Or, have I missed something?" OM Sir, Yes you did. They also remove clitori from majority of muslim women, blow up London tube, kill 100,000 Irakis/year and about to take over you country... Naturally,currently British clitori are in danger. Those horrible Jews...

  • 273. 0 0
    Elizabeth 47 crude, rude and stupid
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:43

    "JEW HATE IS A LONG LEGACY OF THAT SHITTY LITTLE ISLAND ENGLAND" Here are some other legacies of that shitty little island England - democracy, modern republicanism (created in Civil War England), victory against Hitler (we fought for 2 years before the US and USSR were forced into the war), loads of scientific and social advances etc. and, of course, Canada. Jews have, since Cromwell, been a valued and valuable part of British society as they are today, filling loads of top positions in all aspects of life.

  • 272. 0 0
    THANKS GOD
    • commonsense
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:41

    YES THANKS GOD THAT THEY LOST THE WAR 200 YEARS AGO. ALSO 59 YEARS AGO.

  • 271. 0 0
    The Truth About the British Royal Family
    • MichaelF
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:34

    Politically, they are the most insignificant people in the world. Who cares what they do? They are just the final remnants of a by-gone era.

  • 270. 0 0
    #219 - Palestinian Brit
    • MichaelF
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:32

    I can tell you what the British did for my family. They almost sent my grandparents and father back to Germany in the middle of World War II.

  • 269. 0 0
    NO to Antisemites
    • Brod
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:30

    These are craps from Antisemites. Israel should say NO to Antisemites. It does not matter if the person is a prince or a king of Antisemites.

  • 268. 0 0
    Who cares about Prince Charles anyway....
    • Dagma
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:26

    ... the way he treated his wife the beloved Late Diana is enough to speak volumes about his character. And now he has Camilla.... and it is being rumoured that even Camilla ...... Israel does not need Prince Charles. 'Nuff that Prince Edward came with his wife. Who needs Charles.....from a Britisher's point of view.

  • 267. 0 0
    John Allen 214 you're deluding yourself.
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:23

    "All the existing problems we are experiencing with Muslims are an have been created by the greedy British government trying to out manuver the USA, Russia and Germany." So nothing to do with unquestioning US support for Israel, nothing to do with the CIA helping train and finance the jihadis against the USSR in Afghanistan, nothing to do with the US invading Iraq on the basis of lies? It's all the fault of us greedy Brits is it? A greedy race causing global conflict? You haven't been reading Goebbels by any chance have you? Oh and by the wway, if you are going to repeatedly accuse us of being pompus, at least spell it right. It's pompous.

  • 266. 0 0
  • 265. 0 0
    Charlie Shmarlie
    • Jerusalem Jew
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:21

    Who cares? European royalty has always been anti-semitic and is outdated: they just cost a fortune and are today's modern world's parasites. If he doesn't want to come, next time an Israeli politician dies, simply tell Charlie that he is persona non grata in Israel.

  • 264. 0 0
    Charles Who ????? (To C. Linthwite smartass)
    • PJ
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:20

    Come'n !! this guy does not deserve all this attention and we do not need him here. He deserves to go to the natural place of the royal tampax: to the royal intimate place of his mother !! BTW Chris Linthwite can hold his thread

  • 263. 0 0
    Daniel- The jews depend on the UK more than the reverse
    • Be Rationale
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:19

    Jews don't have a slew of friends as it stands.

  • 262. 0 0
    Charles, stay home !
    • Benjamina
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:15

    Although I am normally positive about royals, this prince Charles is not one of my favourites. Israel does not need Charles' presence at all. We all know that most Britons are anti semitic, a lot of members of parlaiment are anyway. Stay home Charles, with your Camilla.

  • 261. 0 0
    The Prince reads the Quran
    • MA
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:13

    He regularly reads the Quran and has good grasp of what is wrong and what is right. He certainly is not anti jewish. Its just that he has no time for Israel. I don't blame him.

  • 260. 0 0
    It's not that cut and dried
    • Stevie the K
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:12

    This doesn't make him an anti-semite per se. Let's face it, Britain is in a diplomatic quandary because first of all, they helped create the modern State of Israel (Balfour Declaration, Mandate, Churchill, etc) and yet they're swimming in Arabs both diplomatically and literally in their own country. They don't want to create a riot domestically just to throw Israel a bone (even if you think they should). Furthermore it's likely that he had nothing to do with any of these exchanges - he goes where he's told, more or less.

  • 259. 0 0
    #259 Well Esther
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 19:06

    Over 260 posts, golly, why make such a big deal of it? It would have gone unnoticed. I read in several 'rag tag' magazines that the Queen is gonna pass him over for William. There probably is a hint of truth to it. He is such a buffoon. The whole idea of 'royalty' is stupid in any case. Regards.

  • 258. 0 0
    Re Ballistic #235 etc
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:56

    Ballistic, there is no respect for this guy, whether he comes or he does not come. Apparently both the invitation and the snub were all-in-all an email affair between lesser mortals, not royalty and Israel officialdom. The public relations guy of the departing ambassador made a hasty gesture of no significance to anyone.

  • 257. 0 0
    Prince Charles May Never Be Promoted
    • Jeff Northridge
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:54

    Queen Elizabeth II is in excellent health and the Queen Mother made it into her late 90's as I recall. There's a good chance that Prince Charles will not outlive his mother in which case he will never be coronated. The line of succession is (in part): 1. HRH The Prince Charles, The Prince of Wales (1948) 2. HRH Prince William of Wales, eldest son of The Prince Charles (1982) 3. HRH Prince Henry of Wales, younger son of The Prince Charles (1984) 4. HRH The Prince Andrew, The Duke of York, second son of HM Queen Elizabeth II (1960) 5. HRH Princess Beatrice of York, elder daughter of The Prince Andrew (1988) 6. HRH Princess Eugenie of York, younger daughter of The Prince Andrew (1990) 7. HRH The Prince Edward, The Earl of Wessex, youngest son of HM Queen Elizabeth II (1964) It would be better to invite Prince William to Israel and not Prince Charles. Queen Victoria reigned for so long that King Edward VII(?) only lasted a few years. Think long-term with this.

  • 256. 0 0
    Why the rebuff?
    • Oliver Masterman
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:51

    I lived half of my life having been taught to respect and love Jewish people. Then I learned about Israel and Zionism and what they did to others. Is Zionism, which appeared with Communism, not the reason for most of modern anti-Semitism?

  • 255. 0 0
    Alan from Toronto and Wanker
    • Jacob
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:51

    Well, I don't need to read Al Jazeera. I have been to the West Bank very recently and I have witnessed some of the ethnic cleansing which goes on there, committed by your wonderful god-fearing settlers. These armed thugs, ably supported by the IDF, regularly attack shepherds on their land, they burn crops, poison the land, steal livestock and unforgiveably, attack children on their way to school. Have you been there ,Alan, or do you just stay in your comfortable Montreal home whilst the people you admire, racist thugs, do your dirty work for you ? I just wish Prince Charles, or any one of those normally useless royals' had the guts to got to Palestine and see for themselves what is being done.As for you, Alan, maybe instead of staying on the other side of the Atlantic, why not get your ethnic-cleansing jackboots out and join the lunatics in Hebron for a bit of Palestinian bashing. It seems to be the only sport Zionists are good at. As for W.Wanker- well, the name really fits

  • 254. 0 0
    to Chris Linthwaite the clever
    • trumpeldor
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:50

    wih such a smart reasoning, he should never visit -france (score of wars with british losses) -spain idem portugal idem -in fact most commenwealth european countries Chris is only antisemitic ....let us demand from jews what we never ask from anyone

  • 253. 0 0
    This is such a non-story.
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:50

    Charles is on good terms with the UK Jewish community, as confirmed by Jewish leaders, and he is also close to Muslims and Christians. The Royal Family, over the centuries, has learned to stay as far away from political controversy as possible. It helps avoid misunderstanings like those that led to Charles I having his head cut off, and it enables them to be relatively untainted (except for all the endless relationship disasters)national figureheads. So he's not visiting Israel before a peace deal, just as he won't be visiting the PA before a peace deal or Iran with Ahmedinejad in power. That's all there is to it. Sorry Brit bashers, no juicy story of demonic Brits and raging royal anti-semitism. Move along, there's nothing to see.

  • 252. 0 0
    Rich in Belfast
    • Stan
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:49

    Got it in one!!

  • 251. 0 0
    #162
    • Moshe
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:35

    Why should Israel share Jerusalem with the Arabs?It was not shared with Israel,that is the old city, from 1948-1967 contrary to the truce with Trans Jordan,which would have allowed the Jews to have visited their holy sites.But then these holy sites, including synagogues and cemetary(the headstones used for paving) were destroyed by Hussein of Jordan.

  • 250. 0 0
    Prince never had any balls
    • real vision
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:34

    Once again PC has proven he has no morals and no balls

  • 249. 0 0
    A Charlie Horse
    • Sy Dill
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:32

    Charlie represents the Church of England. They have been at war with the Jews since the 16th century, One of their kings flirted with Hitler. It could only enhance Israeli's image that he would not want to be caught dead in Eretz Yisrael.

  • 248. 0 0
    Jews all over
    • Daniel
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:23

    Jews all over should get organized and stop visiting the UK.... Prof S. Winberg ( Nobel price of Physics) set the example by refussing an invitation to attend a conference in London.. now, that really hurt the bastards.... imagine if all Jewish luminaries (of which we have plenty) did the same!

  • 247. 0 0
    #200
    • Moshe
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:23

    So what is the difference between the so-called snub today and the snub of all Jews prior to and during WW2? At least their are in their homeland, have security and not exposed to the hatred of the Europeans.

  • 246. 0 0
    Who Really Cares
    • CHGODMK
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:22

    As an American, I'd like to ask who really cares what some European relic like the British monarchy thinks about Israel, especially some loser like Prince Charles. He loved the Arabs so much he was about to give his wife to one. Someone tell me what EXACTLY these monarchs do these days, other than suck away tax money from their citizens. And yes, citizens, not subjects, because these monarchs have no power. They have no responsibilities either, other than showing up to a ceremony. Aristocratic welfare, that's what this is. How quaint of the Europeans to keep their old, worthless customs.

  • 245. 0 0
    Chris Linthwaite - He will also visit Turkey
    • David Israel
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:22

    Where more British soldiers were killed at the war in Gallipoli (Gelibolu). His mother visited Turkey several times in the past. I also remember him in his youth spending his summer vacations in Cape Town during the times of the apartheid. I guess if these are his standards Israel does not need his visit.

  • 244. 0 0
    british anti-semitism
    • rich
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:18

    What nonsense I have been reading. Sam says the British are more anti-semitic than the average European - funny that, I don't recall any British who ever participated in the Holocaust while on the other hand there appears to have been no shortage of Germans, Lativans, Ukrainians, Slovaks, Rumanians, Hungarians, French and so forth. Funny, where I grew up there was no mention of Judaism, either positive or negative, although there was plenty of anti-Protestant and anti-Catholic prejudice about. When will people realise that Israel is not the centre of the world and that being a Jew or a Goy are not the defining feature of being human being - surely being a human being is the defining feature of being a human being.

  • 243. 0 0
    A sensible prince?
    • Oliver Masterman
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:17

    Why on earth would any respectable person want to imply endorsement of Israel? Afterall Israel ignores UN rulings, steals land and homes, shoots children, employs torture....Or, have I missed something?

  • 242. 0 0
    Hey Lakshmi
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:14

    Thanks for the citation. I will check it out over the weekend. Aren't these posts amazing? Here the Zionists invite Charles and when he rebuffs them out comes the usual around the barn type of BS. Why was he invited in the first place? Yeah, well, Zionists are predictable and they look for support wherever they can find it and I am sure a 'character' like Prince Charles rebuffing them stung and the proof of it is in these postings. According to them, they invited a despicable character, and then he refused. Good for him. Honor amongst thieves. Regards.

  • 241. 0 0
    Mehmet
    • rich
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:13

    LOL...and the Armenians and Kurds murdered by the turks ? Comments please, Thank you.

  • 240. 0 0
    Golly Day, what a bunch of sour grape postings!
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:07

    Charles is this and he is that and his family isn't thus and so. Well, if all you Zionists say is true, why did you invite him? Why was it so important that he officially visit Israel? These are just the usual knee jerk responses from Zionists who were hoping to gain a smidgeon of feigned respect from whom they describe as a 'questionable' character, who spurned them, and now we see all these sour grapes. Well, that is par for the course and happens each and every time poor Zionists feel as though they have been ignored/slighted. I guess there is a pecking order amongst the 'questionable' characters on the planet and according to Charles' rebuff, Zionists fall well below that.

  • 239. 0 0
    Mehmet - And Arabs killed many Turks
    • David Israel
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:04

    Arabs killed many Turkish soldiers and some civilians that were retreating from Yemen. Arabs never apologized from Turkey and yet on the mourning day of Ataturk?s death your president and PM rushed to the Saudi Kings hotel room overriding all protocol and stood in respect to him while the king was sitting on his gold throne flown with him in a hotel room turned into a luxurious Arab tent and a picture of himself. While President Perez visited the Mosoleum of Ataturk in respect that king refused to visit the resting place of the greatest Turkish leader.

  • 238. 0 0
    For Richard S and his bowel movements # 205
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:03

    "i read what Clickfool has to say and proceed to have a bowel movement." Do I scare you shitless, Richard? I'll try to be gentler when I know you're reading. (;-) CF

  • 237. 0 0
    Israel visit
    • mike
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:01

    If I was an Israeli citizen I wouldnt be too worried about Prince Charles not wanting to visit their country as the guy is an idiot and I believe most people in the UK would agree with me.

  • 236. 0 0
    That's the desired effect, Richard S # 203
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:01

    "i am.....flatter that we have people like Clickfool so dedicated to Israel." (;-) CF

  • 235. 0 0
    wh # 171
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 18:00

    Wonder if he knows the history of his own country and the massacre of the Jews in York and their subsequent expulsion. The kind david incident was a legitimate attack on military headquarters - not a massacre of innoceent women and children that belong to a certain religion.

  • 234. 0 0
    truth always hurts. get over it
    • socalmaverick
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:58

  • 233. 0 0
    I heard that he supported
    • nmf
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:54

    the muslim world.he and diana and their children have ruined the royal kingdom.

  • 232. 0 0
    RE # 86
    • Scott Havsy
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:53

    To # 84: You obviously fail to undertand that expression. You cannot trust the British.

  • 231. 0 0
    jacob 191
    • alan
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:51

    you read al Jazerra too much !! You need to read more balanced material. Sorry if you cannot understand of a country to defend itself. Viva Israel

  • 230. 0 0
    Slow newsday at Haaretz; Or just warped priorities?
    • Polybios
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:48

    Is Haaretz secretly jealous of "People Magazine"? This is not news. This is tabloid fluff. News is the story hidden down in the weeds about the continuing inability of this lamebrained Olmert government to resolve the teacher's strike. Over 100,000 students are missing out on an entire school year. Haaretz, that has got to be more important that whatever this "Badenburg" adulterer has to do, or say. 200+ response to this drivel! Yikes... get a life, Haaretz.

  • 229. 0 0
    Prince Charles
    • Mordecai Ben Natan
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:47

    The British Royal layabouts, who live on the fat of the land, do no work, but are paid by the taxpayer, are so afraid of the Muslims taking over Britain, which is not too far in the future, that they have to appease those Muslims, and refuse to visit Israel. But they will visit or invite that monster King of Saudi, one of the cruellest leader in the world. Israel can do very well without those layabouts

  • 228. 0 0
    Clickfool, you personally inspire me. thanks!
    • Richard S
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:44

    every morning, i read Haaretz and i scan the Talkback section. i look for Clickfool's random postings. if i see it, i unplug my laptop from its power supply. i then take my laptop with me to my bathroom, where i open up Clickfool's rants. i read what Clickfool has to say and proceed to have a bowel movement. i find his writings inspire me to do so. i then put my laptop down, look into the toilet, look back at Clickfool's posts and find many similarities in smell, texture and quantity. Thank you, Clickfool, for keeping me regular.

  • 227. 0 0
    More spine than US Congress
    • Hugh G. Rekshan
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:40

  • 226. 0 0
    Clickfool and the Stars of David in his eyes
    • Richard S
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:40

    day in and day out, i am amazed, humoured and flatter that we have people like Clickfool so dedicated to Israel. I do not care that his dedication comes across as negative and being anti-Israel or anti-semitic. Its beautiful to see someone like Clickfool wake up every morning with the gleam of Stars of David in his eyes. his life revolves around Israel. he must discuss Israel and talk with jews and Israelis on a continuous basis. Israel is his sole purpose. he thinks he is a detractor, but i actually see him as a promoter of Israel. gets peoples' backs up and makes people more proud of Israel. Thanks, CF

  • 225. 0 0
    far far away
    • kev
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:37

    mehmet what history did you study geobels or mien kampf, lets examine turkish history how many armenians was it? as for kurds how many,oh cyprus how many then,,, read history not the british history of the world according to bevin

  • 224. 0 0
    Have you thought of taking up knitting, Yakov? #195
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:37

    "Whew and I thought that I would have a boring evening! Good thing I made some popcorn before sitting down to read the talkbacks"

  • 223. 0 0
    Haaretz censorship
    • Jon
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:33

    Does anyone understand the whims behind the haaretz "moderators" (censors). I wrote a post last night that never appeared that was perfectly fine. It did reference the word "tampon" but that is part of the record. I have seen so many anti-semitic posts on this board but my post that attacks the royal as the degenrate he is gets pulled. Does anyone understand these capricious board posting policies? Or is it freedom of expression as long as you're either anti-Jewish, left wing, liberal, euro-loving or devoutly secular?

  • 222. 0 0
    No 56. What's in a name?
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:32

    Howard wasn't keen to recognise the Romanian village either. Many Jews changed their names from Eastern European ones to the regular Smith and Jones of the UK. The infamous Mr Maxwell included, I believe!

  • 221. 0 0
    # 193 Danite
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:32

    Okay Danite, no problem, for a fair 2 state solution, I will be delighted to have the (international) spotlight on Switzerland. Believe me, compared to the "bad guys" in the Middle East, we Swiss are as white as the snow. And I am a Swiss patriot, not a nationalist...

  • 220. 0 0
    Londoner
    • Yakov
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:29

    "who would want to visit a state that murders children and starves people for political reasons.?" are you refering to your own homestate or the Palestinian Authority? When you mention starving children/people please back up your statements with facts, figures and reliable sources.As for political murder are you refering to those Fatah backers gunned down by the Hamas in the Gaza Strip? Or those murdered today in the refugee camp of Bourj el-Barajneh of south Beirut between the clash was between two families - the al-Bashir and al-Habet?

  • 219. 0 0
    Jew Hate in England....No 47
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:28

    Makes you wonder why on earth any Jews remain in the UK doesn't it? Or does it? The Fat Cats are more comfortable there than in the Homeland the world gave them.

  • 218. 0 0
    What has Britain done for the Jews?
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:25

    Balfour? What else do they deserve?

  • 217. 0 0
    Phillip's mother - buried in a Christian Holy Site
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:18

    so what has that to do with Israel or the Jews?

  • 216. 0 0
    The "Victim Nation" Victimized Again
    • chet
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:18

    A previous poster wrote: "...the EU owes Israel" and another answered "...owes Israel what?" By virtue of successfully playing on Holocaust guilt for sixty years now, Israelis have developed a sense of entitlement and when thwarted, begin whining and crying "Anti-Semite!", "Anti-Semite!" Hopefully, this snub by the Brit prince is the beginning of a trend of the EU refusing to give in to the "Nation of Victims"

  • 215. 0 0
    Heifetz DID NOTHING TO PROMOTE ISRAEL IN THE UK
    • THE PEOPLE'S VOICE
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:17

    On the contrary he did not hold up Israel as a Jewish State - lets not kid ourselves the UK media attacks on Israel were the worst ever!

  • 214. 0 0
    #54 Londoner, Good description of UK
    • Peace Lover
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:15

  • 213. 0 0
    #44 The Royal family, how???
    • John Allen
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:12

    Someone please tell me what makes them royal'? Royality is what a countries subjets want and what for, I don't know? I guess it makes the British populas feel like they have reason to be pompus. All the existing problems we are experiencing with Muslims are an have been created by the greedy British government trying to out manuver the USA, Russia and Germany. I see these pompus royal family members and all I can do is shake my head. Go find out who holds the largest shares of stock in the Bank Of England. Yep, the mother of the pompus useless royal family. Ask me how I really feel. I wonder how they would survive if they had to work for a living? Pompus,useless and un-productive.

  • 212. 0 0
    Clicky,et. al
    • Yakov
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:08

    Whew and I thought that I would have a boring evening! Good thing I made some popcorn before sitting down to read the talkbacks. Gosh such intelligence and outstanding reading!Natalie, Kol HaKavod you were even able to get your usual"I hate Israel" two cents worth in!Wow I wonder if Charles is reading these glorius comments!Exciting reading!Apartheid state!Wooo!!

  • 211. 0 0
    Pathetic weenies
    • Danite
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:05

    They are so desperate to have some kind of power, they are reduced to these pathetic passive aggressive actions,and of course doing it to israel is a consequence free way to look "progressive" I wonder how eager they would be to be so principled about the many countries they do visit, some of whom are the worst human rights abusers around.This is just more brit wheenie "lets play radical"

  • 210. 0 0
    Swiss
    • Danite
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:03

    You know what the best part of a two state solution will be? it will the spotlight to be turned on racist and criminal countries like swizterland without you guys have this as an excuse to whitewash yourselves.

  • 209. 0 0
    #9 Colin Wright
    • John Allen
    • 16.11.07
    • 17:01

    It's people like you that are pushing the world back into the'dark-ages'. Contrary to people with your limited exposure to history, Israel has never advocated they were openly or secretely 'begging' for world sympathy, just for sympathy. They are trying to wake the world up to what is going to go down, in history, as the worst time in our known 'written' history as the time when world opinion is apatheic to a pending world war. Wake up, it's all about money and power. All Israel want's is to be left alone with what has been given to them and what was won from previous aggresors.

  • 208. 0 0
    State-sponsored terror
    • Jacob
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:59

    Possibly for the first time in my life, I agree with something one of the royal family has done. I applaud his rebuff to a state which sponsors terrorism.Israel should be shunned by all until it ceases its relentless ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. It can start to put things right by dismantling all its illegal settlements immediately. Incidentally those Zionists who shout anti-semitism any time someone criticises Israeli policy insult all those innocent Jewish people murdered by the Nazis. Shame on you.

  • 207. 0 0
    Tim 172
    • Angelique
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:53

    The character from Fatal Attraction also lived in a very bad neighbourhood didn't she? Her apartment was well appointed and beautiful surrounded by abbatoirs and crumbling walls, rats running in the gutters. Sounds just like Israel's neighbours. Perhaps you have something...but the wrong thing.

  • 206. 0 0
    #53 Clickety clack
    • Itsik
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:49

    I doubt it is. The fact is that you visit this site for some bizare reason.

  • 205. 0 0
    Prince Charrles
    • Thomas J Butler
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:48

    Aparthied?? Israeli Arab citizens can vote, have access to higher education. Why would Israel want to invite such a bogtrotter as an official representative of GB. Tony Blair would be a better choice less inbred stupidity

  • 204. 0 0
    Charles' snub
    • Blueyes
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:44

    The article fails to mention that Philip's mother is buried in Jerusalem!

  • 203. 0 0
    English Men and Arab Imagery
    • Yair ben Avraham
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:44

    Wow. Prince Charles reminds me of T.E. Lawrence, i.e., Lawrence of Arabia. A rich English guy who has an overidentification with Arabs. Rather than use his large public clout to bring attention to the real efforts at peace being made on both sides, he maintains a romantic view of Arabs (the majestic sheikh on a camel, wind blowing his kaffiyeh, sword at his waist, beyond reproach), while seeing all Israeli Jews as disciples of Meir Kahane. Maybe he should leave the palace and meet real people once in a while. kol tuv, Yair

  • 202. 0 0
    #5 of course not
    • Itsik
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:44

    They allow state that promote hate to visit them! Like the Saudis...

  • 201. 0 0
    Eureka - Consensus
    • D.R. Zukerman
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:38

    The responses to this only-in-Britain story suggest an interesting consensus -- a "So what's new?" consensus. The consensus comprises two basic groups, I believe -- those who see nothing new in Mr. Windsor's (originally Battenberg) view of Israel and those who see nothing new in the demonic quality of Israel (and Jews). A sort of yin-yang consensus one might say. I would agree with the yin, here, and would note, as indicated by at least one other respondent, the yang tradition on this matter goes back to a vicious royal of the 12th century whose views are, alas, iniideicated by some of the respondents here

  • 200. 0 0
    ways to improve israels image.....
    • ravi
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:38

    want to improve israels image?................. tear down the wall..... take back the settlers..... trash the bulldozers.... stop the targeted killings.....

  • 199. 0 0
    # 183 Margie in Tel Aviv
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:37

    Margie, are you dancing on 2 weddings here...??? Would be nice for the audience if you wouldn't mix up your dialogues in the future....:)

  • 198. 0 0
    Clickfool #179 - We Aim To Please. An Early
    • Dick Hertz
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:36

    morning smile and a chuckle (my time)will determine the rest of your day. Keep well.

  • 197. 0 0
    An Insecure Society
    • Double Click
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:36

    Rather than focusing on Prince Charles' foibles, the criticism's leveled in Talkback should be directed at the Israeli government which so desperately needs ego reinforcement from the outside. Sadly, many Israelis are desperate for approval, yet become so vitriolic when they are spurned. A very insecure socitey.

  • 196. 0 0
    Britain was the cause for the death of many of our people by the
    • Avihu
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:31

    hands of Nazi Germany when it refused entery of Jews to Eretz Israel! We shall never forget our brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, grandfathers and grandmothers, including my own, who were murdered in Europe because the "civilized" British would not permit them free entery to their ancestral homeland of Eretz Israel/Palestine!

  • 195. 0 0
    who gives a rats ass
    • Zolman ben Moshe
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:23

    what Charles does or does not do. There are now 176 posts devoted to this absurdity. People...get some lives.

  • 194. 0 0
    He is not fit to walk upon the holy ground
    • Steven
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:23

    England wants peace. Did the white paper bring peace? Did the English shooting the Jews as they try and enter the holyland bring peace? Did the English lie, that it would turn modern day Israel and Jordan into a Jewish state bring peace? Charles is evil, his son sports Nazi uniforms for fun. He had the best eduction in the world, he should have known better. He did it cause he is an anti-semite, just like his father.

  • 193. 0 0
    What a joke
    • Wan Kar
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:19

    And this klutz of a prince is going to make Israel's image amazing? I'd rather have a candlelit dinner with CFool (just kidding!)

  • 192. 0 0
    #132 Dino You're wrong as usual
    • Margie in Tel Aviv
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:19

    I had an interchange of emails with Richard Cohen and he was indeed talking about the weather. :) Sorry, Dino but you are really much too confident that you're always right.

  • 191. 0 0
    Royal Visits
    • Arik Yacobi
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:17

    What a storm in a teacup. The news media must be short of stories today.

  • 190. 0 0
    to Liliane
    • Dee
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:13

    You said: "The British Royals are really Germans." ...and so ist the rest of you! Remember the german Angles, Saxons and Jutes who conquered the british Islands? You even speak a germanic language... ROFL :):):)

  • 189. 0 0
    Let world's largest welfare case visit welfare recipients
    • Richard S
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:11

    the "royal" family is the world's wealthiest welfare recipients. they get millions upon millions of British taxpayers' dollars to fund their lifestyle, which involves opening theatres, travelling to exotic locations and eating cheese. Therefore, Charles should visit the world's largest welfare recipients, the Palestinian people. they would have a lot to talk about, including how they fritter away donations and taxpayers' money on useless things (i.e. polo and Quassams)

  • 188. 0 0
    snub to Israel by idiot Charles
    • J D Segall
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:10

    Why should we be surprised. Charles thinks that he is the king of the Arabs. Let us pray that this moron never becomes king of England. It is high time that he realises that radical Islam is a serious threat to England and his throne!

  • 187. 0 0
    Prince! Here Prince. Here boy!!
    • Gideon Reader
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:09

    Why would anyone care if that pompous, fatuous fop, of a "royal pain in the tuchis" EVER visited Israel? Exactly how would his visit make a mark or even a tiny dent in the sand? Israel "needs" him? How? Why? By the by. What has he ever done to improve or make stable the socialist government of his own poorly run nation?

  • 186. 0 0
    For Meir # 167
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:08

    There's nothing you could say about any of the members of the Royal family that would in any way distress me, Meir. I am not a monarchist.

  • 185. 0 0
    Such great posting names on Talkback
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:06

    Lou Knee Mitch Iginer Dick Hertz ....my thanks to you and others for the smile you always give me. (;-) CF

  • 184. 0 0
    Clickfool # 53
    • ChanahS
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:05

    "The entire universe rotates around the scrofulous State of Israel." Only in your scrofulous mind, CF. Most people in the world couldn't care one way or the other. I can't begin to fathom why Israel (or it's demise" is so important to you to the point of obsessiveness.

  • 183. 0 0
    Clickfool - Only The British Achieved That Scientific
    • Dick Hertz
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:04

    breakthrough enabling them to polish turds and find Charlie underneath.

  • 182. 0 0
    Prine Charles is welcome here
    • Ben
    • 16.11.07
    • 16:02

    Charles will be king one day. Britain buys a lot of Israeli goods. Israel buys a lot of British goods. I think Israel ought to make a serious effort to solve this problem. It is in everybody's interest to do so.

  • 181. 0 0
    not only is a queen his mother
    • meir
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:56

    there are more then a couple as his aides.

  • 180. 0 0
    Lou Knee in London:
    • Stan
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:52

    I nearly fell off my chair with that post!!!:) I don't think anyone can follow that one up in a hurry - have a splendid weekend & vive la Republic! PS: I pity the poor organic carrots etc. they must be bored to tears having to listen to old Dumbo 24/7. still, its probably not as bad as reading Clickfool 'comments'.....

  • 179. 0 0
  • 178. 0 0
    prince snubs israel
    • kev
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:43

    why he visited pakistan saudia arabia,they really love the english dont they-!thats why they support the insurgents killing british troops

  • 177. 0 0
    You all seem to hate the UK so much, why do you care?
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:43

    I love the way even a completeley minor non-story like this gets the Brit-bashers licking their lips and pouring out the venom. Prince Charles is not an anti-semite, as UK Jewish leaders, who should know, testify here. He has good links with Jewish, Muslim and Christian communities and aspires to be a bridge across different faiths. That is not a bad thing for a prince to be, but it does mean he has to be particularly careful about visiting countries at the heart of religious conflicts. He won't visit Israel, but he's not going to go dashing off to Iran either. On the other hand, he will visit Gulf states even though lots of pro-Israelis won't like it, but he'll also visit the US, which probably lots of Muslims won't like.

  • 176. 0 0
    state visit
    • kevin
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:41

    a state which kiled british men and women well he visited Usa france germany italy france greece turkey jamaica saudia malaysia japan , what a copmplete twat you just made your self look,they killed thousands of brits he went their with out much fuss

  • 175. 0 0
    big fuss about nothing
    • scanadu
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:39

    the pompous former israeli amb. to london appears to be angered by the refuse of the prince to visit the jewish state. curious to know how has he reffered to the so called brooklyn schneerson rebbe self proclaimed moshiach adamant refusal to visit the same state.

  • 174. 0 0
    A Visit From A Constipated Prince, From A
    • Dick Hertz
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:38

    constipated family, from a constipated country belonging to a constipated people. Why the fuss?

  • 173. 0 0
    double standard
    • david
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:34

    "In the past, senior British government sources and sources close to the royal family have said no official visit could take place before a peace agreement between Israel and its Arab neighbors." But did he visit any of Israel's "Arab neighbors"? If so, he is a anti-semite.

  • 172. 0 0
    clickfool it seems your oil whipped prince
    • meir
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:32

    goes off to saudi arabia at the drop of a barrel. last year when the corrupt and murderous saudi royal family had to be mollified who did the british send.old bonny prince charlie himself. he went to saudi kissed ass and came back after a demeaning and servile performance.the arms contract was saved.he sold what there was left of his soul.

  • 171. 0 0
    Israel is national equivilent of "Alex Forrest"
    • Tim
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:32

    Remember the character from Fatal Attraction...she wouldn't accept no for an answer and would try to destroy you if you didn't love her. Sounds so familiar doesn't it?

  • 170. 0 0
    hi maybe
    • wh
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:30

    remebers the 'king david" hotel in jerusalem

  • 169. 0 0
    Royal Punk
    • ESS
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:30

    Prince Charles is a well know momas boy and wimp ...he is ridiculed iin his own country and he was exposed as the sissy he is in the movie The Queen. We also know where the Brits stand these days with all their boycott petitions against Israel. I say Charles should stay home and go horesback riding with Camilla, if he can tell them apart. In fact, let him go to Iran and thank them for giving a captured British soldier back his ipod so he would stop crying. Boo Hoo... and G-d Save the Queen because no one else will, or wants to.

  • 168. 0 0
    Clickfool - thanks for the laugh
    • Chara Mia
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:27

    "The entire universe rotates around the scrofulous State of Israel." Apparently your world does.

  • 167. 0 0
    #27 ariel
    • wh
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:27

    "sandnigger" sounds like racesist to me ,as long it`s not antisemetic ,right!!!

  • 166. 0 0
    so clickfool your royal family loves to wear
    • meir
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:27

    fancy dress.surely ss and brownshirts regalia are out of bounds even for your party loving royal family.

  • 165. 0 0
    Charles once intimated that he would like to be reborn as
    • 17
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:26

    Camilla's trousers - naughty boy. I can not wait to see him reborn. My friends, who had the priviledge, reported that in spite of his unfortunately foolish mien, he is a pleasant and intelligent man who was still unable to help to get the particular residency status. His son sported a Nazi uniform for an occasion - actually both of his sons... Poor father. Please, do not judge him harshly.

  • 164. 0 0
    Chuck
    • ATLAS
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:19

    So Chuck doesn't want to go to Israel. The people of Israel should consider that a real positive. Who needs him?

  • 163. 0 0
    # 108 # ABSOLUTELY CORRECT HE,S A RIGHT ROYAL WANKER
    • Lou Knee
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:18

    Little Englanders hate to hear it but the nasty little island has a prince in waiting who said he wanted to be Camillas " sanitary towel ".His royal daftness chats with blooms and carrots,preferring their company to the company offered by Clickfool and the rest of the anti semitic toothless bulldogs.Poor Charles comes from a family seemingly unable to run personal relationships,governed by bejewelled hags whose sternness seems to have caused the family tree to wilt.Who needs Charles or his hag in Israel,much better that they stay in Wales, purveying organic leeks as marital aids or tubs of organic soup as a conversation partners.

  • 162. 0 0
    Persona non grata - No 10
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:14

    Who on earth would care about being declared Persona non grata by Israel.....! What a joke!

  • 161. 0 0
    Does anyone expect much from Israel - No 121
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:11

    Don't worry Ka - nobody expects much from Israel. Creeping around trying to persuade a British Royal to come is pretty much what we would expect. Forget it - nobody recognises Jerusalem as the capital of Israel nobody will until it is shared fairly with the Palestinians.

  • 160. 0 0
  • 159. 0 0
    LOSE THE GAME TO THE RUSSIANS !
    • david
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:05

    we dont get nothing from this game , let us make sure that england wont make it to Euro !

  • 158. 0 0
    His wife dated an Arab his son dressed up as a Nazi so it`s not s
    • Churchilla
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:04

    The British Empire is long gone and the British Tradition is gone too. this royal prince is used to doing just what he wants without consideration for others

  • 157. 0 0
    Charles is an anachronistic boor with less class
    • The Equalizer
    • 16.11.07
    • 15:00

    than Diana had in her pinkie finger. He is symbolic of a history where Democracy was anathema and poor peasants paid fealty to the throne. Every freedom loving Brit should boot his ass out of England forever.

  • 156. 0 0
    charles
    • gordon
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:50

    do not forget the internment camps that the british set up in cyprus at a time that the European Jewish community needed help to survive not to be imprisoned.

  • 155. 0 0
    arrogant
    • paul
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:50

    arrogant moron/ If anything a visit from Prince Charlie would damage our image

  • 154. 0 0
    Who cares if Camilla's tampon comes?
    • SH
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:49

    I don't.

  • 153. 0 0
    38#
    • Teacher
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:49

    Prince Charles is very bussy to polish up all Britons did and do in Basra. Most likely, he can just bring rage of all homeless, beaten, disabled, murdered, raped Iraqis to Israel. Better he stays at home.

  • 152. 0 0
    NON ENTITY
    • soggy liberal
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:49

    Prince Charles, the Man Who would Be King, is not worth a micro-millimeter of Haaretz' real and virtual newsprint, in that he has no power, he has nothing to say and he has never worked a day in his life ... is this a sign of an actual quiet news week in Israel ? - perhaps a blessing then . I note in passing that Israeli drivers are still managing to succeed where terrorists do not. Ten killed by drivers so far this week - keep it up, guys!

  • 151. 0 0
    Get a game of polo up and he will be there in a flash as long
    • r
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:48

    as all his expenses are covered.......

  • 150. 0 0
    124 Margie of TA.back to your normal style of writing,I can see!
    • lakshmi
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:40

    You are talking about the killing of one fatah member in Gaza,who was assistant to the guy who fled to egypt(and was shot down)who openly boasted of torching Hamas houses.A video was shown to foreign journalists showing young Hamas men beaten to death(while begging for mercy!)by your 'fatah brothers' in the infamous Gaza security,first run by israel then by fatah,before the takeover in June,after which Hamas instituted a humane system of incarceration. I am talking of the systematic torture of thousands of Palestinians by the state of israel and documented by the conservative and well respected B'Tselem. Charles did the right thing by refusing to visit a state that practises such monstrous policies,not to mention the apartheid and Occupation of Palestine

  • 149. 0 0
    Does Israel need a tampon?
    • Jonathan S
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:40

    After all, Charles Windsor said that he did not want to be more than the tampon of Camilla. The whole thing is not kosher …

  • 148. 0 0
    if only he'd married that..
    • ROB OF MELBOURNE AUS
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:38

    nice girl Barbara , from brooklyn.

  • 147. 0 0
    You're all such a hypocritical lot
    • Abba
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:37

    What a bunch of crybabies! You people are so transparent. If Charles WAS going to visit Israel, the whole bunch of you would be happy about it and glad that you're rogue regime gets a little bit more recognition. The fact of the matter is that Israel IS an apartheid state, built on the collective suffering of an indigenous population and a flagrant violator of International law and convention. If it weren't for MY country's help, Israel,long ago would have changed it's disgusting ways and joined the rest of humanity. If you want to be treated like any other DEMOCRACY and western country, why don't you start acting like one?

  • 146. 0 0
    For Efman # 118
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:34

    "Monarchy? hah, another reflection of our historical absurdity" You're pushing against an open door here, Efman. As Talkback regulars know, I'm not a monarchist. I agree with you. But Charles is still the heir to the British throne, will be Head of State in time, and a visit to Israel would be an important event for that country. That's why his declining to visit Israel is causing such squeals of anger.

  • 145. 0 0
    You're getting desperate, "Elizabeth" # 47
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:24

    The massacre of Jews in York took place in 1190AD, Elizabeth. Richard the Lionheart was just about to set off on the Third Crusade, to commit goodness knows what unspeakable atrocities against Muslims.... For you to have to delve into such ancient history is a sign of deperation.

  • 144. 0 0
    Anglican
    • ricardo lion
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:16

    Charles is the heir of the throne. The Queen/King of England is also the head of the Church - the Anglican. So Charles is the next Anglican "Pope", their moral leader. England's next "Christian" and "moral" leader was, while married himself, fornicating with his best friend wife, wich he married after Diana died (or was killed, some say). So much of a moral leader. Thanks for not coming to Israel, the Land of the Tora (Bible) and your Saviour, Rabbi Yeoshua (Jesus).

  • 143. 0 0
    Snub???
    • paul
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:10

    I have one question.....who even wants this pompous parasitical representative of a useless institution to visit Israel?.

  • 142. 0 0
    The UK in WWII & 1948
    • Mr. T
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:09

    All of those pathetic, hysterical accusing the British, en mass, of being and always of have been anti-semitic, tactfully ignore the role the U.K. played in providing safety to Jews (such as my grandmother) who fled the Nazi's and allowing for the Balfour declaration. There is anti-semitism in the UK, as there is Islamophobia and racism, but no more or less than there is in the States and significantly less than the blatant anti-Arabism that was to be seen when I visited Israel (with the exception of TA). Charles is a wacko, but was ahead of the curve when it came to raising the profile of organic produce and environmental issues. Besides, can anyone who grows up in the Royal (German) family be normal???

  • 141. 0 0
  • 140. 0 0
    Not-So-Great-Britain
    • NDM
    • 16.11.07
    • 14:04

    Jews escaping the holocaust were not as important to the Brits as the oranges supplied by the Palestinian region for making their precious orange marmalade. The Arabs destroyed crops destined for shipment to England to torment and terrorize the Brits into making all necessary concessions to Arab interests in the region, to keep the Jews out and prevent the rebirth of Israel. What do Brits eat on their crumpets these days and where do they get their oranges from now?

  • 139. 0 0
    #115 MEHMET
    • IL supporter
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:57

    Same Brits you like sow much,attakced Bosfor and Dardaneli(Your homland Turky) in the Black sea in 1917 as well as in WW2 all in purpose to control seas. Considering fact that was civil war in the ME in 1948 not only Jews fought against British conquers but Mujahedeens(Arabs) did that as well! Only problem for bouth sides was that they lost and Jewish State was created! cheers

  • 138. 0 0
    Richard Cohen
    • rich
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:44

    get off yr high horse... fact is there are also a lot of hypocritical, bigotted, pretentious, ignorant twats in our country ...like Chris Linthwaite and many many of the establishment. They look down their nose at practically everybody. England anyways is well on its way to becoming a muslim state so start preparing to leave.

  • 137. 0 0
    Charles once intimated that he would like to be reborn
    • 17
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:43

    as Camilla's trousers. Such a naughty lad. I can't wait his next life. What I know from common acquaintances,he is a nice intelligent person who is unable even to get the permanent residency status... His son sported Nazi costume on occasion. Poor father... Please, do not judge him harshly...

  • 136. 0 0
    richard cohen
    • yaheskel
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:34

    surely your pride in being british has nothing to do with us.we are only sorry we should be represented by people like zvi heifetz who dishonour us by begging for the presence of the royal family in our beloved nation. this slave has nothing to do with the israeli youth who fought in bint jbeil and jabal maroun last year.he is a slave of drawing rooms and evening wear.

  • 135. 0 0
    richard cohen
    • harzion
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:30

    why would you object to us telling the truth about the royal family?please read royalty and the third reich by jonathan petropolous and tell me if we have been unfair. nothing made up here.including the wearing of ss and brownshirts uniform.

  • 134. 0 0
    richard cohen
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:26

    nothing wrong with loyalty.the subjects of your loyalty refused to bomb the camps an action that would have saved more jews then any other.

  • 133. 0 0
    128 Concerned Citizen
    • tampon
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:24

    right on - that way both Israel and the UK get rid of their worst excrements

  • 132. 0 0
    @61, swiss dino, you cont. to be stupidier and more
    • vladimir
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:12

    idiotic with every moment. of course, jerusalem against all european royals and all europeans, without any doubt.

  • 131. 0 0
    # 127 Margie, has it gotten a bit late last night.....
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:11

    I assume Richard Cohen had rather the political climate in mind and not the British weather. (temperate, temperate, ha,ha,ha....:)

  • 130. 0 0
    Whatever does it matter?
    • English Resident
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:10

    Charles does not appear to be fit to be trusted with the head of State position or his mother would abdicate. It's not a "duty" to visit, though I expect as a matter of courtesy the ambassador had to offer a formal invitation. A bit like Catholic Bishops having to invite the Pope, when they really hope he's far too busy.

  • 129. 0 0
    ka
    • Stan
    • 16.11.07
    • 13:01

    I second that!! Although I think you are being a little unfair - not ALL English people are 'low-life'; I for one have family there. Just ignore irrelevant morons like CF - hopefully they'll disappear, along with HRH....

  • 128. 0 0
  • 127. 0 0
    Let him get what he deserves
    • Concerned citizen
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:51

    I think we should free Yigal Amir and give him a one way ticket to London !

  • 126. 0 0
    Richard Cohen
    • Margie in Tel Aviv
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:47

    Poor you having to stand up for, of all things, the British climate, and call it 'rather nice'. I understand that the correct term is 'temperate' - an example of true British understatement.

  • 125. 0 0
    why do we need that visit
    • vladimir
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:47

    by third rate prince of third rate real house representing third rate country? let him go to fantastic saudi arabia, uganda etc, where he really belongs.

  • 124. 0 0
  • 123. 0 0
    Lackwit
    • Margie in Tel Aviv
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:45

    I would draw your attention to any decent newspaper over the past few months detailing the appalling treatment by Hamas of its prisoners and its Palestinian brothers in Fatah, shooting them through the head and pushing them off rooftops. Prince Charles should really visit them for a personal display of vileness. He might find it illuminating.

  • 122. 0 0
    #115 Mehmet
    • Daybreak
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:36

    Both Jews and Arabs fought British rule in Palestine. By the autumn of 1937, about 9,000 Palestinian Arabs roamed the countryside attacking British soldiers (and Jewish civilians). (Gelvin, Israel-Palestine Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 112). Interestingly, during World War II, when the British were busy turning away from Palestine or arresting Jewish refugees from the Nazis who had arrived under horrific conditions on unseaworthy boats, the Jewish Agency gave British authorities a list of 134,000 Jews in Palestine who wanted to serve in the British Army. (Segev, One Palestine, Complete, Holt, 2000, p. 450). This was one out of every two men of military age and 20,000 women. (ibid.)

  • 121. 0 0
    HRH irrelevant
    • Stan
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:36

    What exactly would a visit by this irrelevant prince achieve anyway? Like many posters have mentioned, he is a figurehead at best, & the British are having a hard time contemplating his unglamorous 2nd wife as queen. Empire is over, royalty is irrelevant & a burden on national wealth. Who cares about this guy? Leave him in peace to talk to his organic vegetable patch. Vive la Republic! Oh, & Clickfool gives too much credit: Israel, that tiny place the size of Wales, may like to be as powerful & influential as he claims it is, but there are limits! Pathetic.

  • 120. 0 0
    to clickfool
    • ka
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:32

    So Clicky - you are invited to stop investing your time and dubious merits to this talkback. You really should not focus so much upon us. We are not after all the center of the world...and for one I would be happy if you would stop expecting us to act any differently than all the other lowlife countries out there...England for one.

  • 119. 0 0
    Will everyone please calm down
    • Richard Cohen
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:31

    I am proud to be a Jew and proud to be British. Stop insulting this country which actually has a rather nice climate. The worst part of these letters is that they disrepect the thousand of lives sacrificed to see off Hitler and his gang. Also do not generalise about the British. It is as bad as generalising about the Jews.

  • 118. 0 0
    Clickfool,Natalie Durson,Pop,ballistic and othe friends,while it
    • lakshmi
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:30

    Charles has done the right thing in refusing to pressure,I want to draw your attention to an excellent article by Stephen Lendman 'Torturing Palestinian Detainees'(Globalresearch.ca,Nov.15,2007). It is based on the 10 year research by B'Tselem. Regards

  • 117. 0 0
    re: clickfool
    • efman
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:30

    Sounds like you are fed up with the Israelis. It's good to know that people from Britain can identify with the Mullah's of the world and conduct global Jihad against the infidels. Wait, aren't you also an infidel? Open your eyes, and stop blaming your horrible life in Britain on the "whiny" Israelis. Monarchy? hah, another reflection of our historical absurdity. Your Prince is as signicant as the tick on my dog's back. Take your misery to the local pub, drink your beer, and start blaming other people for the troubles you encounter in your daily life. The Prince, Queen, Monarcy.. whatever.. is as worthless as the UN, and Israelis truly don't need him to boost Israel's image.

  • 116. 0 0
    most important of all
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:30

    prince charles is rather jealous in guarding his relationship with the despots of saudia arabia.he fancies he has a great relationship and they listen to him.it would not do for him to visit israel.

  • 115. 0 0
    prince charles has gone out of his way to be friendly
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:28

    to muslims in the uk.he has asked for some over the top concessions to be made to them.

  • 114. 0 0
    Irgun and Stern killed scores of UK officers
    • mehmet
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:12

    And Israel never apologized for that. Mind you, not that the British invaded Israel and Israel took it back, in this case there would hae been no need for an apology but the terror organizations of Stern and Irgun rallied an armed campaign in a British sovereign area and killed British officers in a place which was legally under British jurisdiction. So why should the prince visit ? The prince can visit India or Pakistan, these are different, there the people who lived in a place for thousands of years fought against the British, this is different from arriving to the Middle East from Nijmegen and shoot the Brits.

  • 113. 0 0
    the royal family and the third reich included pictures
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:11

    these pictures were of philip himself in a german uniform and mountbatten wearing a german navy hat.there were also pictures of members of the royal family at a birthday party with hitler.

  • 112. 0 0
    prince charles
    • HM
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:09

    First of all - these e-mails were written by his aides. Maybe Prince Charles is not even aware of the invitation. Secondly - not every person on the face of the earth has a burning desire to visit Israel. That does not make them anti-semitic. You all live like a person with a severe inferiority complex - who, the moment somebody looks sharp in his/her direction, cowers in a corner. Israelis and Jews worldwide should catch a wake-up. Disinterest in Israel/Jews/Judaism or dissaproval of actions Jews does not equal anti-semitism.

  • 111. 0 0
    philip said he heard no one expressing antisemitic views
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:08

    but there was no doubt "they were jealous of the success of the jews" and that they felt "inhibitions about them."

  • 110. 0 0
    teh royals and the reich by jonathan petropolous
    • yirmiyahu
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:05

    the quotes given to us by philipsaidso were from the above book where philip added that the royals wanted the nazis to lead europe.this was before the war started.

  • 109. 0 0
    Charles has always been an Arabist and fan of Muslims
    • SystemF
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:03

    He's even dressed up in their fancy attire and memorised quotes from the Qu'ran. He still misty-eyed over Lawrence of Aabia.

  • 108. 0 0
    londoner
    • danny
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:03

    what gall you have,how many people did england deliberately starve to death in india 5,000,000 or was it 20,000,000.hypocricy is alive and well in england. you can keep that closet poof,charlie and stick him where the sun dont shine

  • 107. 0 0
    PRINCE CHARLES A RIGHT ROYAL LOSER ! !
    • W.Wanker
    • 16.11.07
    • 12:01

    Poor old Charles,he just can,t get it right.Nobody wants him as king or his wife as queen.His former wife lead a tortured life.Most of his family seems to have difficulty with their personal relationships.Charles told his lover that he wanted to be her " sanitary towel " a phrase which he and indeed most people would prefer to forget.Since he apparently has meaningful conversations with vegetables and flowers he might find a visit to Israel mentally taxing as the local fauna may not speak English and his highness might not speak Hebrew.His aides,like many little Englanders are probably mild well spoken anti semites of the most despicable sort,bigotted and suspicious of anything foreign like a French bagette.Who would have expected anything else but a cheap snipe from a failed faily member of a failing family.Perhaps he should stay in Wales,Israel will manage well without him.

  • 106. 0 0
    #81 FOOL on Christians feelings towards your socalled Kaffirs
    • Joe Moer
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:58

    I am sure that much like mine his feelings for the AFRICANS are much warmer than his feelings for a BIGOT like yourself me prickFOOL

  • 105. 0 0
    haaretz i must protest
    • phillipsaidso
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:50

    phillip himself volunteered the information that the family was sympathetic to the fascists in germany.he said so himself.

  • 104. 0 0
    #53 the yellow streak and the usual ignorance
    • victor hardman
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:48

    boris the prince has amother who is the head of the church of england. look it up for yourself! this means the roman demi god jesus is the god of the church and jerusalem is the holiest city of christianity ! so if this dope is invited by the owners of jerusalem it is extremely bad manners to refuse on any account

  • 103. 0 0
    the prince on a visit to china
    • greatwall
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:45

    where he was treated magnificently turned his back to his aged hosts and muttered "appalling waxworks."

  • 102. 0 0
    #81 clickfool
    • danny
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:41

    you are a putz! apartheid cannot exist in israel as palestinians are not israeli citizens and do not have the same rights as the israeli jews or israeli arabs.and tell me clickfool, do you have the same feelings towards british moslems as your compatriots.the are really 2nd, class citizens and treated as such.that is why they try to bomb the shit out of you

  • 101. 0 0
    israel should not ask twice
    • harzion
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:36

    invite them once and if they refuse do not ask again.that is the only honourable behaviour. i am deeply offended to see israel chasing people.

  • 100. 0 0
    truly i have never come across a family so entirely
    • balmoral
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:33

    without talent.

  • 99. 0 0
    diana once said she was thick as two planks
    • dimbulb
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:30

    she married into the right family.

  • 98. 0 0
    #77 Clickfool
    • Daybreak
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:30

    How did the British behave when they were in Palestine? Well, to take one example, during the Palestinian-Arab Great Revolt in the 1930s the British employed the "usual tactics of counterinsurgency" against the Arabs: "collective punishment of villages, targeted assassinations, mass arrests, deportations, dynamiting homes of suspected guerrillas and and sympathizers." (Gelvin, Israel-Palestine Conflict, 2005, p. 113). Right, the British got out of Palestine: I wonder why? The British press, among others, "clamored for withdrawal from those remote positions that cost so much to maintain," for starters. (Fromkin, A Peace to End All Peace, Holt, 1989, p. 499). Well, as Orwell said, "hypocrisy is the British vice." (Essays, Everyman's Library, 2002, p. 1350).

  • 97. 0 0
    clickfool the royal family area natural for the
    • mosely
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:29

    british national party.

  • 96. 0 0
    the prince is as vain as a peacock and dresses
    • allisvanity
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:26

    accordingly.

  • 95. 0 0
    Jon
    • sh
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:25

    Yes, Heifetz is keeping himself visible lately. Obviously with an eye to his post-Ambassadorial future. "Diplomacy"'s just a hobby of his but probably more important to his ego than some of the other things he does.

  • 94. 0 0
    not one of the family would have attended university on merit
    • thickastwoplanks
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:24

    quite sinply not an intellectual family.talks to trees i think.

  • 93. 0 0
    # 63 Cipora Julianna Kohn (2nd try)
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:20

    Eccentric: YES (and very much so...) Rude: NO, I don't think so (or would you call Swiss-Dino to be rude...???) :) I would say he is just (very) British.

  • 92. 0 0
  • 91. 0 0
    why is israel chasing people?
    • harzion
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:14

    this like chasing the red cross and the vatican all over again.it is unseemly.

  • 90. 0 0
    "The Royal Family"
    • David Ben Yishai
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:13

    Charles is just jealous of the real royal family, the Davidic dynasty (read the Jews). He may be circumised, but he not part of the covenant between G-d and His people (read the Jews). Jealousy is a horrible character trait.

  • 89. 0 0
    Re bobo #35...you've said it all!
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:10

    Quoting bobo: "I`d suggest it was a misjudgment to even dangle an invitation...."

  • 88. 0 0
    Hey Christian down in South Africa,
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:03

    a former apartheid state staunchly supported by Israel. How do you know that Israel is not apartheid, especially when you probably didn't think SAfrica was apartheid either? Are you still hanging around down there? Well, a lot of people think Israel is apartheid under Zionists even though there are a few Arabs living there who have decided it is better to live in Israel than becoming collateral damage to a gunship attack from a Zionist helicopter. I do believe there is disagreement about your absolute statements. As far as 'making Israel look bad', well, her actions do that, not what anybody says. Regards.

  • 87. 0 0
    Prince Charles being a Freemason...
    • Maureen Ann
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:03

    and the reported interest shown by British Freemasons in Solomon's Temple, one would have thought that Charlie would would have jumped at the chance to visit Temple Mount... interesting to note the many famous men who belong to the Freemasons... Ah yes, the modern State of Israel.

  • 86. 0 0
    Tell us more, Tzvi # 85
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 11:00

    "The Brits (excluding some friends like Mr Blair) have a history of back-stabbing antisemitism. I personally experienced this as a child where their local cucumber-sandwich club would not allow Jews in." Cucumber sandwich club? Cucumber sandwiches are a cliche of bad amateur dramatic societies, where the people in Agatha Christie plays sit around, chatting and spreading resd herrings to disguise the identity of the killer. The idea that there would be a CLUB to eat cucumber sandwiches is extraordinary.

  • 85. 0 0
    Re Scott #24
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:53

    "REMEMBER THE BRITISH SMILE WITH THEIR FRONT TEETH AND BITE WITH THEIR REAR TEETH." Frankly, Scott, I hope we all do. It would be very awkward to smile with our back teeth...

  • 84. 0 0
    Fox hunters will be fox hunters
    • Tzvi
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:46

    The Brits (excluding some friends like Mr Blair) have a history of back-stabbing antisemitism. I personally experienced this as a child where their local cucumber-sandwich club would not allow Jews in. Don't expect any sudden changes.

  • 83. 0 0
    #53 Clickfool
    • Eugene
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:42

    "The entire universe rotates around the scrofulous State of Israel."- Clickfool Clickfool with his numerous hate messages on each and every Haaretz board is an integral part of that Universe that "rotates around Israel" according to his own words.

  • 82. 0 0
    Re Natallie #28
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:42

    "It`s rare that Charles gets into the news outside the UK." Natallie, his extra-marital episodes and his ill-treatment of Diana were such persistent international press fodder for so long, that it will take a few royal generations to sanitize his image.

  • 81. 0 0
    WHO CHARLES THINK HE IS?
    • indrajaya
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:39

    ...to help burnish its international image... I think Prince's Charles will risk to destroy his own image even more rather than he would burnish Israel image by such visit. Just do it. Muslims world would be ready to anticipate that.

  • 80. 0 0
    For Christian Van Nieker, an expert on apartheid # 76
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:35

    I see that you have warm feelings about the State of Israel and its policies towards the Palestinian people. What was your feeling about the Kaffirs of South Afrika, Christian?

  • 79. 0 0
    For Shmuel Saitowitz # 69
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:32

    "It is a well known fact that the Queens husband is of German descent" I think you'll find that lots of the Jews of Israel and America are also of German descent, Shmuel.

  • 78. 0 0
    UK ROYAL VISIT TO ISRAEL
    • PARIS
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:29

    This is just rubbish from an individual which is an historical anachronism by himself. And anyway, while still rather powerful, UK, the US puddle, doesn't anymore rule the waves.

  • 77. 0 0
    Haaretz, it is impossible to access your
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:28

    article on Russia regarding Syria. Could you please fix.

  • 76. 0 0
    For Peter SM # 62
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:24

    "What exactly are you GIVING Israel." In this instance, Peter...respect and approval, neither of which Israel deserves. Charles is right, and Israel should stop pestering. When it behaves better it can ask again.

  • 75. 0 0
    Israel is no Apartheid state.
    • Christian Van Nieker
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:23

    POP is a rabid anti Semite. Israel is no Apartheid state. This is the wording of the Arabs, and Carter. Carter is very involved with the Arab oil, so he will say anything to hurt the Jewish state of Israel. One should ask the Arabs living in Jerusalem if they would want to live in an Israeli Jewish state, or under Palestinian rule, and they would all say that they want to live in Israel, where they have full freedom of religion, voting, representation in the Knesser, have the same rights as Jews, to the ministries, especially, the Ministry of Labour about disputes,live better lives than their cousins in Arabic Islamic states, full health care, and the Muslim women do not get flogged and jailed as they do in Islamic states, if they are raped. This word apartheid stems from anti Semites and Arab states, to make Israel look bad.

  • 74. 0 0
    prince Charles
    • joseph theeboom
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:21

    what is all the noise about, it wont make any difference to israel if Charles comes or not, to accuse him of being an antisemite is unfair we have no proof of that, i have never heard or read any antisematic statements from him, there are many who let us believe they are with us but privately they hate us, that is a fact,that most british are pro arab we all know, they have always been for many reasons, but to accuse charles for all that is a bit over the top, so he wont come, BIG DEAL i want lose any sleep over that lets worry about more important things for israel.joseph theeboom

  • 73. 0 0
    #18 There you go Ben Jabo
    • ballistic
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:18

    launching into your usual personal attacks when you can't refute a point. Regardless of his suits, blah, blah, he is a rep of the British government, who has made it plain there will be no official British visit to the pariah state of Israel until you settle up with the Pals, that is the government's position, according to the article. So what does his suit, waiting for mom to die, blah, blah have to do with the price of tea in China? Nothing. Stop groveling for recognition from those countries who recognize exactly what is going on there today, and other messes and histories long ago are not relevant to the mess there today. Got it? Okay. The Prince can't come except privately. End of story.

  • 72. 0 0
    Not surprising
    • Daniel Wein
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:18

    I'm not surprised. England has become one of the most antisemitic countries in Europe. But Britain's recent spate of regressive anti-Americanism and Jew-Hatred won't save it from being overrun by the Islamists. Unless the British understand this, they're doomed. I wonder what George Orwell would think of all this.

  • 71. 0 0
    Charles' presence would debase Israel
    • Arthur
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:12

    Go take another coffee enema, you sham of a Prince.

  • 70. 0 0
    Re Chris #2
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:10

    Chris, I confess to lacunae in my history knowledge, but when and why did Israel commit the crime and indiscretion that you refer to?

  • 69. 0 0
    Charles Windsor is no gentleman
    • Margie in Tel Aviv
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:10

    When he announced his engagement to Lady Di, as she was then, he publicly announced that one of his main reasons for choosing her was her virginity. One understands the essential nature of the purity of the bloodline of a dynastic monarchy but if this Charles is an example it doesn't breed true for humanity, sensitivity or good manners.

  • 68. 0 0
    British Royal Family Supported the Nzis
    • Shmuel Saitowitz
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:10

    It is a well known fact that the Queens husband is of German descent and that the Royal family was pro nazi. There is nothing new under the sun

  • 67. 0 0
    Re Observer #4
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:06

    Oserver, I had intended to post something in the style of yours, but felt a bit reticent... Royalty and curtseying and all that...

  • 66. 0 0
    Heifetz is a trouble maker
    • Jon
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:05

    Has anyone else noticed how suddenly Heifetz is leaking all these stories to the Jewish Chronicle just as his term is (finally) coming to an end? Last week it was about him becoming Blair's Israel advisor. And what do you know? It's a load of old rubbish. And this week, he's making trouble for Charles - not that I care for the big-eared fool. Heifetz is desperately trying to make himself look good. "Outgoing Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, who worked throughout his service to improve Israel's image". The only image he tried to improve throught his service was his own! He's not exactly whiter than white, now is he...

  • 65. 0 0
    Dutch and Londoner: Image of Holland / UK worse than Israel
    • Laila
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:05

    Dutch: Don't flatter yourself. The image of Holland is way worse than Israel. We now know that many Dutch loved the Nazis and collaborated with Nazi Germany. As to killing children, Londoner you must be talking about the British war crimes throughout the planet since over 1,000 years.

  • 64. 0 0
    rRe Mendel #3
    • Esther
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:01

    Mendel, it sounds much better in Yiddish, horse=ferd...

  • 63. 0 0
    Queen's Uncle Loved Hitler
    • Albert
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:01

    The Queen's uncle was a great fan of Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler.

  • 62. 0 0
    #37, Dino
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 16.11.07
    • 10:00

    There is nothing that he can contribute to Israel. Were he someone of any stature, the story might be different. As it is, he is just an eccentric, rude person who does not know his place in the hierarchy.

  • 61. 0 0
    CFOOL.Gimme?What exactly are you GIVING Israel.
    • PETER S .M.
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:57

    Please list ALL the things Israel GETS from Britain? Who does the world revolve around.?Well the Iranians certainly showed recently who it does NOT revove around.

  • 60. 0 0
    Jerusalem or Prince Charles......?????
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:56

    Better make up your mind, Israeli people....

  • 59. 0 0
    Prince Charles furor
    • I.Kemp
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:47

    His aides have an over inflated opinion of themselves and Charles. I cannot imagine any country wanting such a weak, useless and ineffective individual who tries to be "everything to everyone and ends up being a nothing to anybody"

  • 58. 0 0
    LINTHWAITE.Brits have been killing Jews throughout history.
    • PETER S.M.
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:47

    It was pure British colonialist arrogance that prevented the British high Command from evacuating the King David when they had a clear warning to leave. Have you added up how many Jews you people have killed over the centuries? Have you prayed yet at the grave of the Bishop of York? Remember the Crusades? Remember the millions of Jews who could have been saved during WW2 but for your direct refusal. Remember the Jews the Brits.hanged in Palestine? A rich history indeed. You have no problem with people who encourage terrorists in Britain.So obviously it is not dead Brits that is the issue.

  • 57. 0 0
    DUTCH DRK.You are not obliged to be a hero of Arabia in Holland
    • PETER S.M.
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:32

    When you say bomb all Israeli cities with chemical weapons your place is right there with Syria etc. so you can take the consequences. Go where your loyalties lie.

  • 56. 0 0
    Charlie boy
    • thinking clearly
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:32

    He's been talking to too many plants and there are definite signs of inbreeding :-)

  • 55. 0 0
    Reply to Sam (Post No. 11)
    • Johnny Weintraub
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:27

    Several years ago, a candidate for Prime Minister of Great Britain, Michael Howard, was soundly defeated. Mr. Howard is of Romanian Jewish ancestry and was a leader of the Conservative Party. The Howard family even changed their surname to attempt to fit in to British culture.

  • 54. 0 0
  • 53. 0 0
    criminal state
    • Londoner
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:25

    who would want to visit a state that murders children and starves people for political reasons.?

  • 52. 0 0
    Those pestering, mithering, demanding, whining Israelis
    • Clickfool
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:23

    "In e-mails to be published today in London by The Jewish Chronicle, Peat politely thanked Heifetz and said the prince "would love to come." However, in a later e-mail Alderton sent to Peat, he complained that he was "being pursued."" The entire universe rotates around the scrofulous State of Israel. Gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme....

  • 51. 0 0
  • 50. 0 0
    Israel is Unfashionable
    • guy
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:14

    Before we make sweeping generalizations, remember that we recently had his brother Prince Edward here on a private visit. Certainly though this does reflect (as already stated) a certain negativity of the upper classes in England against Israel---but Israel's success is the best revenge!

  • 49. 0 0
    The Prince
    • Henry
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:08

    Now I know what the Queen was refering to when she spoke of "Annus Horribulus."

  • 48. 0 0
    Prince Charles
    • Naim S. Mahlab
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:07

    The Brits did their best to destroy Israel in its infancy, so why do we expect them to change now ? Why would anyone invite British Royalty to visit Israel is beyond me. I would not allow them in.

  • 47. 0 0
    Let His Royal Tampon (HRT) Stay Home
    • Yishai Kohen
    • 16.11.07
    • 09:04

    The nation of Israel shouldn't debase itself on such a stupid matter.

  • 46. 0 0
    JEW HATE IS A LONG LEGACY OF THAT SHITTY LITTLE ISLAND ENGLAND
    • Elizabeth
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:58

    READ AND GET EDUCATED:A Concise History Of The Jewish People - Google Books Resultby Naomi E. Pasachoff, Robert J. Littman - 2005 - History - 347 pages 43 THE JEWS OF ENGThe Jews of York were alarmed by the preceding massacres and by the setting on fire of .... Antisemitism did not disappear with the expulsion of Jews. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_EnglandLAND: MASSACRE AND EXPULSION Jews came to England with the ... They settled in most major cities in England, especially York and London. ... books.google.com/books?isbn=074254365X... GET EDUCATED!! AND ON AND ON...same old same old

  • 45. 0 0
    peace
    • democrat
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:57

    It is perfectly reasonable to refuse to visit before a peace deal is reached. Maybe if REAL leaders put more pressure on both Israel and the Palestinians, instead of the Arab world coddling the Palestinians, and the Americans coddling the Israelis, then maybe peace could be realized, and both Israelis and Palestinians would have longer, safer, happier lives. Anyone who pretends that Israel does no wrong - or little wrong - is delusional. The best of countries are worse than that, and Israel is far from the best.

  • 44. 0 0
    he visited Iran a few years ago
    • Iranian Canadian
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:55

    This is pathetic, this stupid big nose, ugly prince visited Iran a few years ago. Wow, talk about boosting international image!!! he was ready to serve the mullas in Iran who are some of the most brutal people on earth but hesitates to visit the only true democracy in the middle east. Go figure.

  • 43. 0 0
    The Royal Family
    • MJ
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:50

    Really who needs any of these stiff Arab lovers to visit Israel.Israel needs to be kept clean of these people.

  • 42. 0 0
    A Visit bt Charlie Would Improve Israel's Image, How?
    • Michael
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:48

    If Israelis knew what kind of myths the royal family believed in, I am not so sure they would want this unemployable, philandering spoiled brat to come. Let us start with "British-Israelism" and end with "Defender of the Faith", everything in between is just fluff, like the stuff between his enormous ears.

  • 41. 0 0
  • 40. 0 0
    He's welcome in Gaza
    • Jeff Jafaar
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:43

    He can help with crowd control at Fatah rallies and he can also clean the pavements once all the business has been done on the top floors of high rise buildings. By doing this he will help Palestine's International Image immeasurably.

  • 39. 0 0
  • 38. 0 0
    #5 You have got it right
    • ka
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:38

    The English are totally anti israel - they have no education re history, are swamped in pro-pal media, & are basically anti-jew at heart. That does not really bother me though. What does worry me is the Israeli thirst to be accepted by Europeans. My God these people are the worst left wingers - their world view is as deep as a puddle. They have no idea about the M. East and what goes on in these countries. They have the arrogance to believe they are morally in the right& can inflict upon others their shallow, ignorant slogan-filled ideology. Stupid people run by bigoted & aristocratic politicians, spoon fed on capitalism,all their frustration channeled into leftie causes - like the pals. Charles is the evidence of what UK money can achieve from opportunity and privilige ...and look at him ! Luxuriating with his saudi pals. Israel!We dont need him! We need a good dose of self-respect and legitimacy and to stop running around after other countries to give it to us!

  • 37. 0 0
    Those angry Jews are not obliged to...
    • Dutch Dirk
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:34

    ...to stay in Britain. Those Jews that scream outrage, are obviously missing the part in their brain that visualizes the differences between facts and fiction. The fact is that under the regime of Likud and Ariel Sharon, Israel managed to remove the Germans from the top spot of the World's most hated countries. Israel HAS a bad image and that is beyond obvious. Prince Charles is a decent man and shall be applauded for his stance. If Israel would like to polish-up its image, it can start first thing in the morning. How about sending the IDF to Hebron and order the arrest the entire settler mob overthere? Such a move would be in the interest of the Israel, as such a move would really polish-up the image of Israel. Right?

  • 36. 0 0
    Prince Charles holding the key to ME peace
    • Swiss (Dino)
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:28

    His message to Israels political establishment: No peace (efforts) = No glory (fame) Yes, life is sometimes hard, isn't it...???

  • 35. 0 0
    THE Royals don't mind boosting the Saudi image for a quid.
    • PETER SM
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:27

    No Protestant Churches in Saudi No Human rights in Saudi Plenty of British weapons in Saudi. Plenty of Saudi Wahabi hate literature in British mosques. What can you expect from a proper charlie who wanted to be Camillas tampon.

  • 34. 0 0
    Don't panic
    • bobo
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:24

    i wouldn't worry too much Israel. Charles is not exactly flavour of the month and doesn't command headlines like Diana did. I'd suggest it was a misjudgment to even dangle an invitation....

  • 33. 0 0
    Who Cares!
    • Zelkha
    • 16.11.07
    • 08:06

    Let this d*ck head visit the colonies like Australia, they enjoy visits from royalty and after all the majority of Aussies voted against a republic and want to keep the monarchy head of State. Personally the only British I want in my life is BBC Prime and the cheaper airfares with BA

  • 32. 0 0
    ONE CELLED ANIMAL
    • NEAL
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:54

    THE MAN IS A PARASITE!

  • 31. 0 0
    There are enough parasites
    • NJG
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:51

    Prince Charles is a liar and a cheat who married his adulterous mistress! In Israel this man would not be allowed to marry the mistress of such an affair! There are enough sinners in the world, so he can stay locked in his castle tower! There are enough parasites in the world already too!

  • 30. 0 0
    STAY AWAY!
    • Neil
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:41

    Britain?s Prince Charles is a liar and an adulterous! This man,Cheated on his beautiful young wife with an old dried up hag! He will give Israel a bad image!

  • 29. 0 0
    Bully!
    • Hopeful
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:27

    The world needs to isolate Israel until it quits its racist ways and frees the captives from their jails of poverty in Gaza and the WB. Charles is a statesman instead of a politician, and so he can afford to do the right thing. Pity more world leaders cannot do this, and end the brutal occupation by isolating its perpetrators.

  • 28. 0 0
    Cipora Julianna Kohn # 9
    • Philippe
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:26

    And she was lucky she was not honor killed.

  • 27. 0 0
    The reason that Israel cares what Prince Charles says..
    • Natallie Durson
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:24

    Israel is a nation which thrives upon the perception of "persecution" and "discrimination". These perceptions allow all manner of freedom of action for Israel. In order to maximize this freedom, it is important that Israel find "anti-Israeli" attitudes anywhere they can. If someone says something, not obviously "anti-semitic" then it can be spun to make it more clear, if less accurate. It's rare that Charles gets into the news outside the UK. There must be a shortage of "anti-Israeli" news these days.

  • 26. 0 0
    Storm in an English tea-cup
    • sh
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:18

    If the position has always been state visit after peace deal, what's new? That one or other private secretary reiterated that?

  • 25. 0 0
    Delusion
    • Philippe
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:10

    Gee ! He is afraid that his visit would improve Israel international image. Does he really believe that outside of Britain any-body cares about that obsolete monarchy. One can also note that the image of the so-called royal family is not that great itself. As I have always said: Vive the French. We have a true solution for these pedant monarchs, it is called the guillotine (lol).

  • 24. 0 0
    Prince Charles and what used to be the British Empire
    • Scott Havsy
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:09

    Who cares if that ugly anti-Semite ever visits Israel. REMEMBER THE BRITISH SMILE WITH THEIR FRONT TEETH AND BITE WITH THEIR REAR TEETH. What has Britain ever done for the Jews except to hide the truth about the Holocaust and to give the Arabs weapons and fortresses when Israel declared their statehood.

  • 23. 0 0
    H... R... H...
    • jg
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:08

    His Royal Hemorrhoid...

  • 22. 0 0
    Harry showed the royals true colours
    • miloimnick frm north
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:03

    Blue blood , brown shirts,and swastikas! But this does not mean that all of Britain are antisemetic.

  • 21. 0 0
    British Royals Not Friendly to Jews / Israel
    • Liliane
    • 16.11.07
    • 07:02

    The British Royals are really Germans. They changed their name to Windsor to make it British. Princess Margaret was a raving antisemite and the Queens grandson loves Nazi uniforms. The Queen was one of the few European Royals who did not attend the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Aushwitz.

  • 20. 0 0
    A Royal Wart
    • Bill Foonman
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:50

    Prince Charles is an embarrassing wart on the Royal Family's bum. Why do you think the Queen has never handed him the reins - so to speak? He has graduated from being weird and out of touch to simply eccentric and out of touch, so don't expect anything more from him than you get right now.

  • 19. 0 0
    H... R... H...
    • Arnold Levy
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:48

    Hopeless... Reprobate... Hell-bound....

  • 18. 0 0
    LET PRICE CHARLES STAY HOME
    • * BEN JABO
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:28

    The only purpose he serves is to wait for his mother to pass on--Can anyone name anything he has done during his worthless lifetime--??-- He has been leaching off the public for his entire lifetime--He used to put on a sailor suit and pretend he was in the military--

  • 17. 0 0
    To Hell With the Weirdo
    • Tod Zuckerman
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:12

    Never liked the jerk, and his father is even worse.

  • 16. 0 0
    Sad to say it
    • Sam
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:11

    The British people in general are more anti-semitic than the average European. Whether this stems from the Jewish resistance in Palestine after WWII or is it just ingrained for some reason in the British psyche, I just don't know. The bottom line is the British just don't like the Jews, never have and never will

  • 15. 0 0
    prince charles
    • Dennis Slapo
    • 16.11.07
    • 06:07

    I always told my daughter I would rather her marry a Jewish beggar then prince charles. No money, no position is worth one hair from a Jew. prince charles is a beggar like everyone only he does not know it. He thinks that he owns what he thinks he has. He owns nothing like the rest of us, but even much less then the poorest Jew. Let him stay and rot where he is. Israel needs Torah and a true Jewish King that is all.

  • 14. 0 0
    #5, Alan, exactly
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:55

    In particular, I am referring to the 200 lashes and six months jail to the victim of a gang rape in Saudia.

  • 13. 0 0
    An anti-semite?
    • a reader
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:36

    Ah yes he must be an anti-semite. I mean he's done all the things anti-semites usually do...Make anti-semitic comments, call for persecution of jews, outlawing the religion...actually no, all that the email implies is he does not want to go to Israel so he does not help their international image...the Nerve! Having a political opinion that doesnt agree with the jewish community. That's not allowed. Seriously, you can't claim Israel and Israel's supporters believe in democracy and then freak out everytime someone does or says something to against Israel. The foundation of every functioning democracy is the ability to disagree with others.

  • 12. 0 0
    the visit
    • Shmuelshachor
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:28

    Israel's image doesn't need to be burnished by the visit of camilla's "kotex",prince or no prince....

  • 11. 0 0
  • 10. 0 0
    Persona non grata
    • Alan
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:10

    Israel should declare HRH Prince Charles a persona non grata.

  • 9. 0 0
    Everybody has to love Israel
    • Colin Wright
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:07

    Obviously, to feel otherwise is evidence of antisemitism. What other explanation could there possibly be?

  • 8. 0 0
    What do you expect
    • Alan
    • 16.11.07
    • 05:06

    In Eurotrash snobbish circles Israel is considered a "Sh**tty Little Country" as a former French ambassador to UK has put it. These are the same circles that extended a royal welcome to the Saudi King -- of the lets-give-200-lashes-to-a-rape-victim fame...

  • 7. 0 0
    Prince Charles
    • geoff
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:55

    What's the big deal, there are many other big -eared Dumbos around? Besides wasn't it his ex who was the non -anti semite in that family?

  • 6. 0 0
    Good For Him
    • Wally
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:55

    Why support the public image of an illegal occupation and a slow genocide of Israel's natural inhabitants, the Palestinians?

  • 5. 0 0
    Why would he want to visit an Apartheid State?
    • POP
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:55

    Royalty should not visit states that promote hate the way that Israel does.

  • 4. 0 0
    Charles' image
    • Observer
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:49

    It's hard to believe that a visit by the Royal Tampon would burnish Israel's image. Why anyone would want to associate with such a sleazy nebbish is beyond me.

  • 3. 0 0
    A horse is a horse is a horse
    • Mendeleyev
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:37

    whichever way you look at him

  • 2. 0 0
    Why should the Prince of Wales
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:33

    Want to visit a state born out of the killing of British Women and children?

  • 1. 0 0
    Such a Anti Semitic Guy
    • ralphsrant1
    • 16.11.07
    • 04:30

    Such a Drain on British Goverment Money Such a Hypocrite Such a Anti Semite. http://ralphsrant1.blogspot.com/