White House: Obama did not send letter to Netanyahu
A researcher with ties to Dennis Ross published an article on Wednesday saying that Obama sent a letter to Netanyahu offering U.S. guarantees in exchange for a two month settlement freeze extension.
By Natasha Mozgovaya, Jack Khoury and Barak Ravid Tags: Middle East peace Barack Obama George Mitchell Mahmoud Abbas Benjamin NetanyahuThe White House denied on Thursday that U.S. President Barack Obama sent a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu proposing a set of U.S. guarantees to Israel in exchange for Israel extending a freeze on settlement construction in the West Bank for another two months.
"No letter was sent to the Prime Minister. We are not going to comment on sensitive diplomatic matters,” said Benjamin Chang, the deputy spokesman for the White House National Security Council.
|
U.S. President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu |
| Photo by: AP |
It is not clear, however, whether Obama could have made the offer via means other than a letter.
Earlier on Thursday, Palestinian negotiator Nabil Shaath said that U.S. special envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell denied that Obama made such an offer to Netanyahu.
In an interview on Nazareth's A-Shams radio station, Shaath said that Mitchell made the denial during a meeting on Thursday with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah.
Shaath added that the Palestinians would not return to the negotiating table unless Israel extends a freeze on settlement construction in the West Bank and that the Arab League would support that position at its meeting next week.
An article published on Wednesday on the website for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy by David Makovsky, a researcher with ties to Dennis Ross, Barack Obama's chief advisor on the Middle East, reported that Obama had written a letter Netanyahu in which Obama offered to support the presence of Israel Defense Forces soldiers in the Jordan Valley even after the establishment of a Palestinian state, if Israel would agree to a two month settlement building freeze.
Netanyahu was reportedly inclined to reject the offer.
Obama's letter was said to include a long list of American favors in exchange for an extension of the settlement building freeze, which ended this week. Most of these favors are critical to Israel's strategic security needs that Netanyahu has been demanding for years.
Other commitments that Obama reportedly offered Netanyahu in the letter include an agreement not to ask for any more building freeze extensions, an agreement to veto any anti-Israel UN Security Council resolution in the next year, and an agreement that the future fate of the settlements be dealt with only as part of a final status agreement with the Palestinians.
Obama's letter was said to include additional commitments, including a series of guarantees to prevent the smuggling of weapons and missiles into a Palestinian state, a lengthy period of interim security arrangements in the Jordan Valley and a comprehensive regional defense pact for protection from Iran to follow the establishment of the Palestinian state.
The American President also reportedly vowed to upgrade Israel's security capabilities and increase the three billion dollar security aid package that Israel receives annually. The letter included commitments to advanced weapons and early warning systems, including satellites.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
..... not stopping for one moment to realize how fantastically far fetched that thing is.... Not even an April 1st joke would try spreading such gross imagination!
He hasn't a clue who he's dealing with. First he plays kissy face and mea culpa with the Arab world in Cairo, then, refuses even to take a half hour chopper jaunt over to Jerusalem to calm the Israelis down, then humiliates Bibi in front of the whole world at the White House servants entrance, and now he wants the whole Jewish world to treat him as the Meshiach and cower in the corner at the same time. FUGGETABOUTIT!
so lets see...first rahm is leaving...then we hear axelrod is too....and now, its like ross is being tossed under the bus. anyone know what these 3 have in common? I always said they were obama's cover for the jewish democratic vote..and that once he felt it time, they were expedient.
Obama is so utterly clueless when it comes to diplomacy. He created the mess over settlements when he unwisely opened his mouth at the beginning of his Administration, and Abbas has never forgotten. Now Obama is trying to persuade Israel to stop construction for the growing Israeli families in Judea and Samaria with this: From an Israeli perspective, moreover, it’s not clear how much the U.S. assurances are worth. Reportedly, the assurances are (1) that Washington will not ask for a moratorium extension beyond 60 days, (2) that the United States will veto any U.N. Security Council initiative — Arab or otherwise — relating to Arab-Israeli peace during the agreed one-year negotiating period, and (3) that Washington will accept the legitimacy of existing Israeli security needs and not seek to redefine them. OK, Barry, so if Israel continues to build, you will abandon them at the UNSC and will question their security needs? Nice. Thug.
You seem to care a lot for the "growing families" in Judea and Samaria. How about the basic freedom for the people of Gaza? I guess you would prefer George Bush to handle this matter.
A return to the only legal borders -- those laid out by the UN in 1947 -- an end to aid to either side, and recognition of a Palestinian and a Jewish state as envisioned in the original UN declaration? Pretty wild and crazy, huh? Maybe make that the outcome if Israel can't agree to something else.
so far I only heard demands/requests of Israel giving something..I yet to hear anyone demanding palestinians to do anything.... Looks to me incredibly one-sided approach..Netanyahu is doing his job well and I hope mistakes of the past will not go unheeded... Nothing should be given to palestinians until something tangible is offered by them... No more free rides....
Israel must give for nothing in return. And Obama calls this a "negotiating process?" But then, Chamberlain called surrendering Poland and Czechoslovakia to protect the Brits a "negotiating process" as well.
that the Pals are lying again, which wouldn't be a surprise.
I beg to differ, it is Israel that looks uncooperative and stubborn, and not at all uncertain. Why criticize America or the Palestinians on this? Israel has single handedly refused to comply, and prefers to keep building, against the advice of the entire world, which is not a surprise.
was said in the letter, whether sent or not, Israel should look at what would happen if it doesn't allow negotiations to be extended by continuing the settlement policy. No automatic support at the UN! No support for Israeli forces in the new Palestinian state! Reduced security support! Reduced monetary support that goes to settlement encouragement. Possible EU sanctions. If Bibi can't hold his government together with a building freeze, how can he hope to make any kind of peace that leads to a Palestinian state and the withdrawal of settlers from the West Bank?
All sides suggest things to their own preference and selectively leak them to the press in hopes of pressuring a particular outcome.The Jordan Valley troops for Israel is just a Netanyahu wet dream for killing any prospect of Palestine having sovereignty. It makes no sense for Israeli security that a camera or two on a pole couldn't provide. If Israel cannot bring itself to abandon the Jordan Valley, it better look much more carefully at a bi-national state.
Israel has no place in the Jordan Valley. Any presence of the IDF or Jewish settlers undermines a free Palestine. The occupation either ends completely or it becomes fruitless to negotiate any further.
has zero credibility unless they impose right now a settlement freeze in the WB and East-Jerusalem. The world is tired of the double standard ,show and eternal peace process with zero result.
they wouldn't find ways to attack Israel incessantly while losing their tongues when the Palis murder pregnant women and children (including their own)
i' m not Jewish but love the State of Israel. My question is who is really in charges of foreign policy. I never witnessed such a mess in Israel. The Prime Minister said one thing and the next few hours the so called Foreign Minister said something totally opposite., that make Israel look like a Banana Republic where no one seem in charge. In my opinion, dump Lieberman and bring Kadima into the coalition.
An unbelievable offer by Obama, including offers of too long term favors which the Palestinians are likely to bitterly oppose, such as vetoing every anti-Israel decision in the UN in the coming year, exactly when pressure on Israel is needed to conclude the peace talks, or to not push for the certain need of an additional extension. If Netanyahu doesn't grab it, he is an unbelievable fool or an unbelievable weakling. Obama must feel desperate to make the offer. Two months will get him over the coming midterm elections, but if I were him, I would have talked to the Palestinians about continuing to mull the talks for 5 more weeks rather than lose a good pressure lever on Israel for little gain. Indeed, the Palestinians should be wiser to offer Obama to be doing just that if he withdraws the long list of offers to Israel.
Here it comes - wait for it - the trademark Obama wheeler-dealer explanation: "You just didn't UNDERSTAND me". Which Americans are sickeningly used to by now. The Obama regime will explain that, yes, that had indeed "offered to support" a continued Israeli security presence along the Jordan River.....but that ultimately the PLO would have to AGREE to it! This is why "Obama guarantees" are as worthless to Israelis as they are to Americans. The guy is a sleaze.
Everyone has something to say and have others deny it was ever said while the the wheeling and dealing goes on endlessly and fruitlessly. What is ever going to happen after another 2 months 'freeze'?. How can a 'peace agreement' be reached, according to Netanyahu, before the fate of the settlement is agreed upon?. Everyone better read Jonathan Cook's article in www.Zmag.org about the real reasons for Israel's refusal to have a peace agreement- they are all economic, while security and religious considerations provide the cover.
As a Palestinian people, we're believe in peace and will get it back soon or later that's is our right ...
You really think that? What about the offer to Arafat a few years back when they were offered 98% of what they wanted? instead they resorted to violence...... If the Palestinians want peace, they should start acting like it... stop the hatred in your children etc...
Obama is desperate for the peace talks to last throught the American elections. This can be done in one of two ways. Get Israel to extend the freeze by two months or get Abbas to remain in the talks in spite of settlement expansion. Obama tried both methods and both failed. This is why he is now desperate. Netanyahu kows that, in the end, he will extend the freeze. Before that happens though, he will put the squeeze on Obama for every possible thing he can get. It will be quite a list on top of what Obama has already given him and what America gives Israel every year. Obama is an embarrassment to America. He is a fool and a weakling. I forsee a remarkable turn of events in which an incumbent president does not receive his partys nomination for a second term. I just hope that America can keep the damage Obama is doing to a minimum.
everything that you said is logical and quite accurate, but Obama is still the most popular democrat in the u.s. Moreover, americans are not very passionate about palestinian demands or the whole peace process in general. Fail or Succeed in the peace process means very little to the insurmountable domestic policy issues of u.s politics. I agree that in the end, the freeze will be extended minimally, (enough to get through the november midterms) i am curious as to what obama will promise netanyahu for the 2 month peace and quiet.
Durson is desperate for the peace talks to fail. She is an embarrassment to America. She is a fool and a weakling but definitely a hate mongrol.
written anything, anything at all positive about Israel and/or the Jews?
Two months are all that is needed to get through the American elections. What happens after that doesn't bother Obama.
This Durson woman is actually talking about peace...a dirty word for her.
Israel is already loosing that battle.
Wishfull thinking Greg. I suggest you pay a visit to Israel and you will find a booming democratic country. Pay a visit to the Galilee to see and visit the Israeli Arab towns and villages and see how they live and what rights they enjoy. Israel will be here long after you are gone and the Palestinians will still be whining beggars living on the charity of the world.
Geert Wilders anyone?
please?
Obama seems to be made of different stuff. He aspires to do what is "right", more than what political considerations dictate, as he did with healthcare. The problem is that he is too soft, both with his Republican opponents and with Israeli ideologues. Mr. Obama, if you want result with the Israeli right wing, shower them with threats, not favors.
When one looks back, it is clearly seen that the greater the "friendship" of a US President to Israel (meaning that he applies less pressure on Israel to pursue peace), the less is accomplished. Our greatest "friends" were Clinton and G. Dubya Bush. Clinton did everything Barak asked him to do, including in Camp David. The result: no peace, only Intifada II. Dubya Bush came up with the Roadmap, a plan but no pressure on Israel. Nothing useful resulted. Looking back at the "bad" presidents, Nixon helped Israel with military equipment in Yom Kippur, but then prevented Israel from vanquishing the Egyptian Third Army. He preserved Egypt's honor, and peace became possible. Carter was even insulting in his pressure on Begin. But he ended up god-fathering the Peace Agreement with Sadat. Papa Bush was publicly pushing Shamir, even causing his regime to fall, This resulted in the Madrid Conference which led to Oslo. Obama seems to be made of different stuff. He aspires to do what is "right", more than what political considerations dictate, as he did with healthcare. If the Likud brings upon us an imposed international solution, so be it. The cure will be better than the continuation of the present diseased situation.
cool off, threats are for bullies. Sound familiar, thats what you and all your friends do everyday. Israel knows how to handle threats, thats why we still exist.
Both say one thing to Israel and then refuse to live up to promises. But then BHO, Clinton, and their House Jews have already sacrificed the US southwest to Hezbollah financed terrorists from Mexico, so why should Israel expect any different
As usual, the Islamists protect their own by denying Christopher's irrefutable FACT that the Islamists are in fact training and financing the Mexican drug cartels. The fact is that to Islam it is not about religious beliefs but profits from drugs! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers /2584989/posts http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/79021
they lie cheat and deceive at every turn.
Now that is an honest and (above all) clear-headed politician. Let's not forget he's not Muslim... that helps a lot does it?
If the USA is pumping so much into Israel, should ISRAEL be doing the begging to the USA, and not the other way around?? The whole situation just defies logic....
The USA is "Pumping so much" into Israel. That is just an absurd statement. That 3 billion is 6 % of Israel's annual defense budget. How about the billions being given to Hamas and the PLO (oops I mean PA). Or the many billions winding up in the hands of the corrupt Taliban whom they attempt to bribe for cooperation in Afghanistan. The money they give to Israel is returned fully through Israel's industrial and service poducts that service American Markets.
Cost of defending wealthy oil-embargoing, terrorism financing Saudi Arabia and Kuwait from Iraq and Al Qaidah - 4 TRILLION dollars, 7,000 US lives (not counting the 3,000 Americans 19 Saudis killed on 911 while the "palestinians" threw candy and cheered as the twin towers fell) Cumulative cost of providing Israel with defense assistance - less than 2% (two percent) of this, and NO American servicemen dead or even fighting on Israeli soil - not even ONE in 63 years
invaluable cherry tomato technology.
Annual Foreign Military Financing (FMF) grants to Israel represent 18.2% of the overall Israeli defense budget and FMF levels are expected to increase incrementally from a baseline of $2.4 billion in FY2008 to approximately $3.1 billion over the next several fiscal years. see:Congressional Research Service 7-5700 -www.crs.gov - RL33222
Israel gets these as loan guarantees and pays them back every time..... What do the Palestinians have to say now?
see for example:Congressional Research Service 7-5700 -www.crs.gov - RL33222