• Published 17:00 23.07.10
  • Latest update 19:36 23.07.10

UN rights body names team to probe Gaza flotilla raid

Foreign ministry official calls the UN decision hasty and 'part of the UN Rights Council's obsession against Israel.'

By Reuters and Haaretz Service

 
The United Nations Human Rights Council appointed a team of international experts on Friday to investigate Israel's raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla and called on all parties to cooperate.

The fact-finding team comprises three independent experts --Sir Desmond de Silva (Britain), Karl Hudson-Phillips (Trinidad and Tobago) and Mary Shanthi Dairiam (Malaysia), a U.N. statement said.

Israeli forces approaching Gaza flotilla

Israel Navy forces approach one of six ships of an aid flotilla bound for Gaza on May 31, 2010.

Photo by: Reuters

The 47-country Council voted to set up the independent inquiry on June 2 to look into what it called violations of international law in Israel's commando attack in May in which nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists were killed.

"The expertise, independence and impartiality of the members of the mission will be devoted to clarifying the events which took place that day and their legality," said Thailand's ambassador Sihasak Phuangketkeow, current Council president. "

We call upon all parties to fully cooperate with the mission and hope that this mission will contribute to peace in the region and justice for the victims," he said.

In response to the UN's decision, a foreign ministry official said that the UN Human Rights Council's made its decision in haste, and that it was "part of the Rights Council's obsession against Israel."

"The Israeli probe, conducted with transparency, makes the organization's probe completely unnecessary," the official added.

The Israeli navy stormed the flotilla on May 31, killing eight Turks and a Turkish-American on board a Turkish ship.

Israel said its commandos acted in self-defense and has rejected calls for an international inquiry into the raid.

But Pakistan and Sudan led a move by Muslim countries at the UN human rights body, here they hold an effective majority, to condemn the raid as outrageous and demand "full accountability and credible independent inquiries".

The UN team is expected to travel to Israel, Turkey and Gaza in August to interview witnesses and gather information before reporting back to the Council in September. The Council opens a three-week session in Geneva on Sept. 12.

It was not yet clear whether Israel -- which has a long history of rejecting UN probes as one-sided -- would cooperate and allow the team to visit, according to UN sources.

Israel announced in June that they would be establishing an independent public committee to investigate the raid.

"It is not ideal, but the other options are less good," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said regarding the probe. "The flotilla to Gaza was not a one-time incident. We are in the midst of a difficult and continuous fight against the State of Israel."

A retired Supreme Court justice, Jacob Turkel, is heading the committee, also includes two international observers and tackles the legality of the blockade of Gaza and the legality of the navy's actions.

A separate Israeli military inquiry released on July 12 found intelligence and operational errors in the raid but defended the use of force.

De Silva is a former chief war crimes prosecutor at the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone. Hudson-Phillips is a former judge at the International Criminal Court who also served as attorney-general of Trinidad and Tobago.

Shanthi Dairiam is a Malaysian women's rights activist working in UN and Asian regional forums.

 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 52. 0 0
    At last
    • MA - Litani
    • 24.07.10
    • 20:38

    If Israel has nothing to hide than lets see if the UN team have a different result.

  • 51. 0 0
    Compensation next
    • Murat
    • 24.07.10
    • 15:45

    Murder of nine unarmed men in internation waters is unquestioably a crime under ANY circumstances. What does Israel do to murderers of its own citizens? Shall Turks prepare the assasination teams or will they wait for justice?

  • 50. 1 0
    hypocracy
    • A.A.
    • 24.07.10
    • 13:28

    UN is good enough when it speaks against Iran but is 'always against Israel' if it comes with uncomfortable questions? Nobody is buying your whining anymore.

  • 49. 1 0
    For those of you who are so anti-UN
    • reno
    • 24.07.10
    • 11:42

    Perhaps it would be a good idea to lobby your government to withdraw from the organization. That way you needn't worry about those nettlesome laws you're always breaking.

  • 48. 0 0
    Israel uses UN against others
    • dani.a
    • 24.07.10
    • 07:37

    Israeli forgot that UN is used by Israel and her allies:US and her allies in sanctions on Iran in the four round of sanctions.But when UN tries to make an inquire about an attack in international waters on unarmed people attack which drove to the killing of nine,then is demanded to break UN. Every Israeli citizen knows that Israeli leaders are people of a bad category.:many are in jails,many are under justice inquiry,many have bad reputation but when they speak in "Israel name" they become saints without sins in the eyes of Israeli common people who jump to defend them and to blame immediately a question about a decision made by these leaders as antisemitic,anti Israeli.Remember:the leaders everywhere are doubtful persons and Israel is not an exemption.

  • 47. 0 0
    what else they need to check?
    • funny
    • 24.07.10
    • 07:00

    let's ignore whatever israelis told you, but the IHH themselves published photos for a)beaten israeli soldiers b)injured israeli soldiers c)'peace activist' with knife in hand... anyone still want to say 'peace activists' overpowered soldiers AFTER 9 of them were killed?

    • 0 0
      what else??
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:46

      The images show people defending their ship which was raided by foreign commandos in the middle of the night in international waters. The very few smuggled photos and videos also clearly show that Israelis opened fire from the sea before the helicopters arrived, three of the commandos were captured, and one of them even given first aid by a doctor. Numerous credible international testimonies confirm that the commandos prevented the injured people from getting medical attention who later died. Israel still has not released any of the tons of footage it has confiscated from the passengers, which clearly shows that they are afraid of the truth. There is a lot to investigate.

    • 0 0
      Where are the videos?
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:47

      I mean the full version which shows IDF heros shooting their victims multiple times in the head and back....

    • 0 0
      what else??
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:47

      The images show people defending their ship which was raided by foreign commandos in the middle of the night in international waters. The very few smuggled photos and videos also clearly show that Israelis opened fire from the sea before the helicopters arrived, three of the commandos were captured, and one of them even given first aid by a doctor. Numerous credible international testimonies confirm that the commandos prevented the injured people from getting medical attention who later died. Israel still has not released any of the tons of footage it has confiscated from the passengers, which clearly shows that they are afraid of the truth. There is a lot to investigate.

  • 46. 0 0
    This can be Israel's big chance
    • European
    • 24.07.10
    • 01:21

    This is Israel's big chance to cooperate fully, with open access to all involved in the decision making and execution of the crimes in international water. The desastrous lack of Israeli cooperation in the preparation of the Goldstone report must not be repeated. Also, cooperation might wash away the silly decision to set up a one sided inquiry panel by the same persons who made the decision to allow armed commandos to gun down passengers of an aid convoy in international waters

  • 45. 0 0
    The Guilty are Afraid?
    • Hamish
    • 24.07.10
    • 00:18

    If Israel is innocent, blameless, and keep insisting they did nothing wrong, and not even want to apologize, they should welcome this UN investigation with open arms. Let some light be shed on this atrocity.

  • 44. 0 0
    What a waste of time
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 24.07.10
    • 00:01

    70% of the medicine on the flotilla was past the expiration date, the medical equipment was substandard according to the Gaza doctors who received the goods. In addition, Israel sends more aid everyday to Gaza than was on the entire flotilla. Add to that that all video's show that the 6th ship started the fight while the first 5 went off without a hitch. Bottom line there is nothing to investigate. It was a PR staged event by known terrorists.

    • 0 0
      what else??
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:48

      The images show people defending their ship which was raided by foreign commandos in the middle of the night in international waters. The very few smuggled photos and videos also clearly show that Israelis opened fire from the sea before the helicopters arrived, three of the commandos were captured, and one of them even given first aid by a doctor. Numerous credible international testimonies confirm that the commandos prevented the injured people from getting medical attention who later died. Israel still has not released any of the tons of footage it has confiscated from the passengers, which clearly shows that they are afraid of the truth. There is a lot to investigate.

  • 43. 0 0
    israel should let the world learn what has really happened
    • visitor
    • 23.07.10
    • 23:24

    it is time for the truth, what are you afraid of israel?

    • 0 0
      visitor need new glasses?
      • Rory
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:01

      You can see the truth on Youtube, but the fact is you can't handle the truth.

    • 0 0
      no need for new glasses
      • visitor
      • 24.07.10
      • 16:55

      why do I need to trust anything posted on youtube by IDF itself? since when do we take IDF propoganda credible? There were people from 32 different nationalities in the flotilla but they all say the same thing:Israeli soldiers brutally attacked and killed innocent civilians. If you like youtube also watch the videos posted by the activists. then you can realize IDF videos were mere fabrications. And as I said in the beginning, if you do not have any wrong why you are so afraid of an investigation? let my people go!!!

  • 42. 0 0
    Let them investigate!
    • MIKE
    • 23.07.10
    • 22:54

    Show them that bombs are constantly being lobbed into Israel from Gaza with deadly intent; explain that these bombs do not grow on trees, that they come from somewhere; that the importation of bombs and bomb-making materials by sea is an option that the bombers use; that, as a result, a blockade was justifiably instituted; that this flotilla decided to run the blockade and failed to cooperate with the military when ordered to stop so that they could be boarded and their cargo inspected; that the military did what they had to do to sop the ships and inspect their cargo; that upon doing so, military personnel were violently ambushed and attacked by hostile elements on the ships; and the military personnel did what every other person in that situation would have done, namely protect themselves.

  • 41. 0 0
    For Those Complaining About Whether the Investigation will be Fair
    • Doug
    • 23.07.10
    • 22:45

    As the article says, the investigation will be done by a team of International experts, not by the UNHRC. The three announced so far appear to be well qualified and of very high integrity. Is there reason to believe that any of these three will be biased? If so, what is the reason?

  • 40. 0 0
    Since Israeli is already guilty, we find Israel guilty and hence Israel is guilty
    • UN
    • 23.07.10
    • 22:04

    Since there is an Indonesian on the commitee, I am still waiting for UNHRC vote to investigate the killing of 2M Timoris and 1M ethnic Chinese by Indonesia. I guess we will be waiting for a long time...

  • 39. 0 0
    The Real Terrorists
    • Samuel Dean
    • 23.07.10
    • 22:02

    I find it quite hypocritical when Israel defends itself against terrorists attacks a few hand full of people from around the world cry out against a nation that have the right to defend itself. I'm a South African and I'm aware of current events and global trends including the Middle East. I'm not a Jew and I do not favor the Jews, but I'm for "Truth and Justice" toward all peoples created in the image of the Creator. If Palestinains desire to live in peace they must give peace a chance. I do not believe Israel is a nation destined to kill Palestinians for no justifiable reason. Those of us who are wise and up to date with current global events know who is hindering the peace process in the Middle east and those so called activists who cry out against Israel's response to terrorist attacks are the Real Terrorists who themselves are encouraging terrorism. Those Real Terrorists are the real enemies of peace and enemies of the Palestinian people. If they are truthful and real friends of the Palestinian people and of peace they would rather cry out against those attacking and planning attacks against the Jewish people.

  • 38. 0 0
    UN Inquiry
    • CT Yankee
    • 23.07.10
    • 21:48

    They can use the same inquiry panel used when Hamas blew up all the buses and pizzerias in Israel.

  • 37. 0 0
    UN investigation
    • Josiah Jacob Ben David
    • 23.07.10
    • 21:44

    Didn't N. Korea sink a South Korean vessel with a torpedo? Many lives were lost. Did the corrupt UN ' investigate ' this? How can an organization as corrupt as the UN investigate anything? They themselves are in need of investigation.

  • 36. 0 0
    Mary Shanthi Dairiam
    • Eric
    • 23.07.10
    • 21:35

    I have a strong respect for any woman who will fight for her rights when they are denied, especially in a muslim country. That being said, is this really the best use of her time? In the months since the raid, how many muslims have been killed? How many Khurds, how many christians in Turkey, in Iran, in the palestinian territories, in Gaza? Is this really the best use of her time? Or is it just that the hopes are that when you fight a democratic country, it will at least listen to criticism? Something that can't neccesarily be said about Iranian elections, Turkish attacks on Khurds, Fatah and Hamas fighting, etc? The UN didn't even investigate four of it's own soldiers killed in southern Lebanon last month. If that is the case, I guess that in a small way this inquiry is a compliment towards Israel.

  • 35. 0 0
    Probe What???
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 23.07.10
    • 21:05

    5 of the 6 ships came in without incident, the 6th ship was a ringer. The so called "humanitarians' had links to terrorists groups and the video's clearly show 1) they started it 2) they used electric saws to cut weapons from the guardrails of the ship 3) that the attack was premeditated by the terrorists. This case is closed. Add to that 70% of the medicine delivered was past the expiration date and the medical equipment didn't work or was the wrong stuff needed according to the Palestinian doctors in Gaza. Plus Israel delivers more to Gaza everyday than was on all of the flotilla and what you have have is a staged incident for PR gain and to make Israel appear abusive, both false.

    • 0 0
      Maybe main purpose of the flotilla was psychological
      • Esther
      • 24.07.10
      • 08:34

      ...to show the Gazans that they do-no-stand-alone... Israel clearly over-reacted... either erroneously or by intent... that's the only point that needs clarification... it was probably by default... everyody with any sense was out-of-town...

    • 0 0
      Doug
      • "staged incident for PR gain and to make Israel appear abusive"?
      • 24.07.10
      • 12:53

      If so, it was a smashing success. And Israel's politicians, IDF officers and commandos deserve an academy award for best supporting actors.

    • 0 0
      Your ignorance is simply horrific
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:52

      Where do you get your news from? 1) Israel started it by boarding passenger ships in the middle of the night in international waters with lethal weapons. 2) There is nothing wrong with self defense. 3) All passengers aboard the other ships confirm that Israeli soldiers used violence during boarding. Numerous passengers were tased, kicked, and beaten up. Israel didn't allow things like pasta, chocolate, building supplies, medical equipment, cookies, etc. until the blockade was eased as a direct result of this incident.

  • 34. 0 0
    Slow news day?
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:38

    Yawn, who cares? This Gaza flotilla incident is no mystery, it if anything was a valuable lesson to Jihadists world wide and to weekend activist wannabes who think the Mid East is their Playground. What about some real news for a change?

  • 33. 0 0
    Should read the United Nations Terrorist Rights Council
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:31

    This group seems to becoming a supporter of terrorist. Terrorist use schools to launch missiles and they say little to nothing. Terrorist bring children with them on there missions they say little to nothing. They have little to no credibility except with the extremest

  • 32. 0 0
    Who posts comments here?
    • Tony UK
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:22

    I feel as if I have walked into the united nations assembly, every favourable comment regarding Israel receives many thumbs down, are there only critics of Israel here?

  • 31. 0 0
    There is a call to all parties to cooperate. I think we should cooperate!
    • S
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:17

    The final say is not that of the investigators but that of an International Court of Law, if the case is deferred to it. In such case, our cooperation during the investigation will have been very important.The Court will most probably be neutral and therefore it should get as many facts as possible to give a proper judgment. This, therefore, is why we should fully cooperate now. Having seen the videos, I think there is enough proof that the Turks are the guilty party in the tragedy.

  • 30. 0 0
    Could have been AVOIDED
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:15

    If Israel had taken US or EU advice and made its own inquiry open and transparent, this could have been avoided. Instead, Israel chose to make the inquiry secret and closed and opaque to hide something from the Israeli people and the world. You should have learned from the Goldstone experience. Or are Israeli politicians that arrogant to think the entire world is a gullible as Barack Obama?

    • 0 0
      Mark: "the Goldstone experience"
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 24.07.10
      • 07:40

      so you admit that goldstone was nothing but an "experience." why don't you concentrate on the very dire national security and foreign policy blunders of the obama administration. syria was quiet during the despised bush era, and so was turkey. india, won over by bush, is being lost by obama. china openly shows its contempt. hezbollah is on the mexican border teaching narco-terrorists how to build car bombs. us domestic policy is in shambles. yet you have the gall to hector and lecture israel.

    • 0 0
      So Full of It Cipora
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:32

      You really need to ignore Faux News. They have no objective except getting a civil war started in the US. Obama has made some mistakes. But he hasn't managed to kill off thousands of US service personnel in a war of choice. The US doesn't own or run Syria or Mexico or Turkey. Why hasn't Germany fixed Afghanistan or Mexico or Iran? Why hasn't Israel? Apparently, you haven't learned that there are rules that Israel signed up to obey.

  • 29. 0 0
    Immediate Reaction and Aftermath
    • Sephardi
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:13

    As always, one can expect the malevolent hawks who unconditionally support evil, to dismiss the probe and name the investigators "biased, anti-semitic or leftist". But whatever the outcome of the probe, whether as accurate as Justice Goldstone's report, or as comedic as their internal military investigation, this is yet another blotch in the reputation of this state... to which history will not attach high regards. Even if not immediately apparent to some, it is Israel's loss... and many of its supporters are either ignorant or oblivious to this fact.

  • 28. 0 0
    Immediate Reaction and Aftermath
    • Sephardi
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:11

    As always, one can expect the malevolent hawks who unconditionally support evil, to dismiss the probe and name the investigators "biased, anti-semitic or leftist". But whatever the outcome of the probe, whether as accurate as Justice Goldstone's report, or as comedic as their internal military investigation, this is yet another blotch in the reputation of this state... to which history will not attach high regards. Even if not immediately apparent to some, it is Israel's loss... and many of its supporters are either ignorant or oblivious to this fact.

  • 27. 49 0
    If Israel Is In The Right And Has Nothing To Hide...
    • chet - Canada
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:07

    then let it cooperate fully with the inquiry. Don't hold your breath waiting for this to happen.

  • 26. 0 0
    maybe they should investigate both...
    • will
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:06

    israel is not off the hook because of transgressions of others...

  • 25. 0 0
    Is it so complicated?
    • Israeli
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:56

    The only substantial legal question is whether the arrest of the flotilla was legal. On one hand these were international waters, on the other hand the flotilla intentions were publicly stated. I wonder how come in the international legal community, the answer to this simple question hasn't received a unanimous clear cut answer. Law is not an exact science, but the incident doesn't seem to be so legally complicated. My understanding is that the arm siege on Gaza is internationally legal, whence breaking it illegal. Since the flotilla intentions were to break this siege, its intentions were illegal and the interception is consequently legal. The notion of "non-proportional force" is a non-issue due to the armed resistance of the flotilla, as exemplified by wounding Israeli soldiers. The humanitarian issue is also not here because, the flotilla had the opportunity to unload its cargo in Egypt or Israel - to be transferred to Gaza. This my understanding but I am not a Lawyer.

    • 0 0
      The "arm siege" on Gaza is internationally legal?
      • Ft
      • 23.07.10
      • 21:53

      How can you be so shure of that? Everybody has the right of self-defense. Gazans too. The underlying logic of Israel is that it is at war with Gaza. But everybody knows that there is no war. Israel just thinks it can do what it wants. But the days of that game are over.

    • 0 0
      Perhaps we had better get the experts in because my understanding is totally different
      • RichardL
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:10

      My understanding is that the siege of Gaza is illegal because article 101 of the San Remo Manual says any blockade should not cause suffering to the civilian population, while the Red Cross amongst many others are saying there is a humanitarian disaster there. The flotilla intentions were in keeping with UNSC resolution 1860, so there was nothing illegal in their actions. The matter of disproportional use of force is very much a matter when you consider that people on three boats offered only non-violent resistence and got heavily roughed up for it. Come to that the number of causalties on the Mavi Marmara was pretty excessive too. Then you have the appalling brutal and sadistic treatment of the detainees on the boats and Ashdod (injured left on the deck under the helicopter suffering the draught and the spray for hours, trod and kicked too, people beaten up for not signing forms or handing over their passports, kept in the backs of vans for hours and routinely beaten.) Since Eiland chose to pretend all this did not happen perhaps we had better get the neutral team in and see what they say. That's my understanding.

    • 0 0
      armed resistance of the flotilla
      • 24.07.10
      • 03:26

      as exemplified by wounding Israeli soldiers and the videos that clearly show the attack the soldiers received... but some people still don't believe what their eyes see.

    • 0 0
      armed resistance??
      • Murat
      • 24.07.10
      • 15:56

      The people were defending themselves from foreign armed commandos who boarded their ship with lethal weapons in the middle of the night. The smuggled photographs published in newspapers all around the world clearly show that three commandos were captured and one of them was even given first aid by a doctor. They could have easily killed those commandos if that would have been their intention.

  • 24. 0 0
    A bad joke
    • Sam in Toronto
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:51

    As John Bolton once wisely stated, (I paraphrase) you could take the top 10 floors off the UN buiding and no one would notice. What a pathetic bunch of losers and thives. The UN is a kleptocracy. I am so proud that Canada continues to stand with Israel. No thinking person cares what the duplicitous disgusting liars at the UN say or do. The end.

  • 23. 0 0
    UNHRC is not a judicial body
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:43

    the pretense that the unhrc, itself an appointed branch of the general assembly, is a judicial body is a farce. the sole purpose of this farce is to bully israel. nor should we forget that the general assembly, and the unhrc in particular, are composed of states which are among the most prolific violators of human rights. israel should not co-operate with this new attempt to deprive her of her sovereign rights to self defence. the idea that co-operation would lead to a more balanced outcome is misguided.

    • 0 0
      Neither is the Israeli group
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:47

      If the Israeli group had been a judicial inquiry, this might have been avoided. Your gov opted to have hidden and opaque inquiries, not open and transparent ones. Still haven't learned from Goldstone. Eh?

  • 22. 0 0
    UNHRC-what a joke!
    • Netherlands
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:40

    According to human rights groups, the council is controlled by a bloc of Islamic and African states, backed by China, Cuba and Russia, who protect each other from criticism.[3] UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and former High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson have criticized the council for acting according to political considerations as opposed to human rights. Specifically, Secretaries General Kofi Annan and Ban Ki Moon, the council's president Doru Costea, the European Union, Canada and the United States have accused the council of focusing disproportionately on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

  • 21. 0 0
  • 20. 0 0
  • 19. 49 88
    Israelis clamor for an investigation into events that occurred in 1915
    • Natallie Durson
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:24

    but they are ready to move on and forget events that happened eight weeks ago.

  • 18. 0 0
    Disband UN starting tomorrow
    • USA
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:21

    what a bunch of sore unrepentant losers majority of whom rogue arab and underdeveloped 3rd rate countries. It is not a secret that torture and abuse of their own people in islamic countries (women in particular) is every day occurance. The same people obsessed with Israel and trying their darnest to dirty Israel's image before the world.. Nice try but as far as I am concern UN is gone as it is ONE-sided and UN-fair... GOOD RIDDENCE!!!

    • 0 0
      UN, the "West" and the others
      • Pierre S., Oslo
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:46

      You mean, the UN can't be trusted because it's not run by the USA, Israel or Europe? Just by some "3rd rate countries"? A touch of racism there, perhaps? (which anyway is in the DNA of the state of Israel). No torture in the USA, or in Israel? Wake up, open your other eye, USA.

    • 0 0
      Disband UN; are you kidding?
      • Hope
      • 24.07.10
      • 12:02

      Without UN resolution and blessing the establishment of Isreal had been not possible. Also dont forget the backing of J. Stalin of USSR. That is the UN that Isreal condemns day out day in. After all Isreals legetemacy comes from UN resolution. Dont forget ever!!!!!

  • 17. 44 0
    Here they go again..."IHH were a terrorist group.." "etc etc"..strange how Israel RELEASED th' nasty terroristas...I can imagine how
    • CJ
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:19

    P*SSED OFF some folk must feel....they had a whole flotilla of nasty terroristas and LET THEM GO!! Oh dear...foiled again!

  • 16. 50 0
    Cooperate !
    • Walt D
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:09

    if Israel has nothing to hide ,why not cooperate with the Un-Commission ? The fact that the members of the internal army investigation team were not even authorized to interview the commandos involved,goes to show that the army is apparently not willing to tell the whole story.

    • 0 0
      Don't be so naive
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:46

      We've been through this many times before. The inquiry's conclusion is written ahead of time and no amount of cooperation will get it to admit that Israel was within the bounds of international law and that its soldiers opened fire only after being attacked with lethal force.

  • 15. 0 0
  • 14. 46 0
    You do realize how implausible this sounds?
    • Colin Wright
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:03

    '...The Israeli navy stormed the flotilla on May 31, killing eight Turks and a Turkish-American on board a Turkish ship. Israel said its commandos acted in self-defense...' Pretty much sums it all up.

  • 13. 0 0
    move on already!
    • alenby
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:58

    How long are they going to drag this out!

    • 0 0
      Don't hold your breath Allenby
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:07

      People who have an obsessive hatred of Israel will go on and on saying the same inane things until you die of boredom.

    • 0 0
      flotilla
      • IH
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:16

      they will hopefully "drag it out" until they discover the truth!

    • 0 0
      exactly
      • dave
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:19

      They should do that, and do the same international search about Armenian genocide, as PM Erdogan offered. As opposed to most Israelis claim, turks, especially current government offered an independent international probing about armenian genocide. One can find even Erdogan's video (offering an international reserach, and releasing all the documents about 1915 events) on youtube.

  • 12. 0 0
    UN Excercise In Flotilla Futility Only To Besmirch Israel, Not To Seek Justice For All, Including Israel
    • Lavi - Seattle
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:57

    If the UN inquiry team is starting their inquiry with the Israeli boarding of the flotilla ships then their credibility is not worth the paper their predictable reponse will be written on. They should be first readying subpoenas for the IHH organizers and instigators, the militant Turkish shahid activist volunteers, and the government of Turkey for their role in attempting to break a blockade in a time and place of war.

  • 11. 0 0
    israeli raid and the UN tyrany of the majority/hypocrasy
    • Michael Levine
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:51

    Why hasn't the UN investigated North Korea for its role in the sinking of the South Korean Navy vessel that killed more than 40 south korean sailers?

  • 10. 0 0
    Now all we need is Abbas to call it off
    • Pal - Atlanta
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:43

    just like he did with Goldstone. What good is he as a Palestinian leader anyway??

  • 9. 46 42
    According to the UN
    • Mark
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:31

    Israel is the only nation in the world that violates human rights. Interesting to find out the time spent by this UN HRC on Arab allegations against Israel vs the rest of the world. I always wondered how in the modern would we could have genocide after genocide in Africa. Well it's pretty clear now, the UN is too fixated with every little incident in Israel to allocate any resources to real atrocities. Very sad. Perhaps the UN should go the way of the League of Nations.

    • 0 0
      They did it too
      • Alik
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:00

      It's amazing to me how every time Israel commits a crime, its supporters point to other criminals and whine, "We are not the only criminals around." Try that with the police in your city and see if that will get you off the hook. Every country would love to investigate its own crimes so it can cover them. Can you imagine a world in which we hand suspects the right to investigate themselves? Innocent people are not afraid of inquiries and justice.

    • 0 0
      You're right Alik
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:16

      Innocent people are not afraid of inquiries and justice. Innocent people, however, are afraid of inquiries that presume guilt before innocence and that are therefore unjust. Just as a black man in 1960's apartheid South Africa could not get justice, even if he was as innocent as a baby, Israel cannot get justice from a world body that is against it from the start.

    • 0 0
      Alik - Comparatively Israel's violations are a petty theft
      • Mark
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:50

      but are investigated like serial murder....Where is the justice in that?

    • 0 0
      UN is a sad satire
      • Chaim Ben Kahan
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:41

      We see no justice, no help coming from the UN, it is there to serve third world dictators getting richer.

  • 8. 54 0
    so,does this mean that israel is Out of Law state?
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:05

    It was not yet clear whether Israel -- which has a long history of rejecting UN probes as one-sided -- would cooperate and allow the team to visit, according to UN sources.

    • 0 0
      What's the use?
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:01

      The commission already stated it's been set up to look into int'l law violations. Israel is presumed guilty before the inquiry and you have no problem with it? Oh yes, I forgot. Since Israel for you is guilty of its very existence, all this makes perfect sense. How convenient.

  • 7. 65 0
    justice prevails
    • rodney australia
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:52

    lets hope justice comes to the intellectuals and family men who lost their lives

  • 6. 71 0
    Why should the commission be biased against Israel and towards Turkey?
    • Shamil
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:51

    This is absolutely nonsense which is used to discredit the works of the new commission. If there is nothing to hide and nothing to worry about, why do you think the members should be sidelined with Turkey against Israel. Israelis like UN resolutions or actions when they are sanctions against Iran or opening the way to destroy Iran, but compleletly dissatified when they are opening the way to a neutral review of Israeli acts not to mention several of them Including those requires Israel to return to pre 1967 borders. This absolutely the doublethink described by George Orwell in 1984.

  • 5. 0 0
    Why bother ?
    • The Teacher/Instruct 23.7.10
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:45

    I can tell you the results right now.

  • 4. 73 0
    goodmorning!
    • dady cool
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:44

    It is too late, 9 people died, nothing will turn them back to the life. But maybe this will stop pirate state.

  • 3. 95 0
    Israel's internal probe
    • Gokhan
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:40

    Israel's internal probe does not mean anything to international community because it is obviously not independent nor neutral. Even PM of Israel admitted that internal probe was established because the other options were less good.

  • 2. 55 0
    What the best commission of inquiry would have been
    • Logios
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:39

    It would have been best to have an international commission with an Israeli, a Turk, and two neutral/foreign members that Israel and Turkey would agree on. This should have been arranged in negotiations between Israel and Turkey. A majority vote would have meant 3:1, a convincing majority with the two neutrals probably agreeing. Such an arrangement would have improved the relationship between Turkey and Israel, while a strictly Israeli commission can only create more distrust. Unfortunately, Israeli paranoia precluded this from happening. I hope the UN Secretary General pushes for such an arrangement.

    • 0 0
      What paranoia?
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:51

      The UN focuses more on Israel than on all the other world conflicts combined. Hundreds of thousands of people dying in Africa and elsewhere doesn't command 1/100th of the UN attention given to Israel. You call that paranoia? I call it realism.

    • 0 0
      what intentions
      • Marc from Europe
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:10

      these comissions will never happen beacuse the whole mess was done on purpose. this issue serves erdogans interest in domestic issues and thats why.

    • 0 0
      Er Tell me, How many UNSC resolutions against the perpetrators of folk dying in Africa and how many UNSC resolutions against Israel...and NO, the UNSC is not Muslim dominated...
      • CJ
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:26

      Of course it's realism. Israel is USURPING another people. Has been doing so for 62 years. First problems first....

    • 0 0
      CJ you are too funny
      • Gilles
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:55

      I say that the UNSC passes virtually no resolutions against real massacres of defenseless civilians in Africa, and you turn around and say that that fact PROVES that what's going on between Israel and the Palestinians is worse than anything else in the world. If the UNSC resolutions are based on a false premise, they can't be the proof of anything.

    • 0 0
      Mr. Gilles, your paranoia is showing
      • Logios
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:37

      Please read my post again, then answer the question: What did I claim that paranoia caused? If your answer has anything to do with the UN, read again. The correct answer: It prevented setting up a joint commission with Turkey. Now, perhaps you have another theory of what prevented this from happening, but please don't involve the UN with this. Ain't relevant, and talking about the UN indicates paranoia (and/or stupidity, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt).

    • 0 0
      Its all in your mind Gilles
      • Reuben Kincaid
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:46

      The 223 UNSC resolutions against Israel ask no more than the UN Member uphold it’s obligation to the UN Charter, ratified Conventions and Peace Treaties. The majority of the 223 UNSC resolutions re-iterate prior resolutions. Only the US Power of Veto has prevented action being taken and allowed Israel to ignore it’s obligations. If a country has not adhered to the law or it’s obligations, is it biased to ask again?

    • 0 0
      Giles-That's because Israel has consistently
      • reno
      • 24.07.10
      • 08:16

      broken the law and ignored UN resolutions since 1948. The UN is merely trying to get Israel to listen. The crimes of other countries tend to be for a shorter period of time. If any other country were to break the law continually for so many years, the UN would focus on them as well.

  • 1. 72 76
    Seems like the conclusion is drawn up before the inquiry
    • Gilles
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:29

    "The 47-member forum voted to set up the inquiry last month to look into what it called violations of international law in Israel's raid on a Gaza bound aid flotilla, during which nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists were killed." Interesting. The inquiry is not going to look into whether or not there was a violation of international law. The fact that this commission believes there were definitely such violations is the departure point. Kind of like telling an accused that his trial will look into his guilt rather than determine whether or not he committed a crime. And then the UN wonders why it has less than zero credibility.