• Published 22:00 19.08.10
  • Latest update 22:00 19.08.10

U.S.: Israel, Palestinians 'very close' to direct Mideast peace talks

State Department says all parties, including the Quartet, will release separate but simultaneous statements saying the stalled talks will resume early next month.

By The Associated Press and Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news Middle East peace

 The Obama administration said Thursday it is near to securing an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians to resume direct peace talks, while some U.S. officials said an announcement could be imminent.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, U.S. President Barack Obama, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, U.S. President Barack Obama, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in New York in September 2009.

Photo by: Reuters

The State Department said an agreement was "very, very" close but that details were still being worked out. Speaking privately administration officials familiar with the matter said an announcement could come as early as Friday or Saturday. Those officials spoke on condition of anonymity due to the delicacy of the ongoing diplomacy.

"We think we are very, very close to a decision by the parties to enter into direct negotiations," State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters.


"We think we're well positioned to get there."

To that end, he said Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had called Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad late Wednesday and spoken Thursday with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the special representative of the Quartet of Mideast peacemakers - the U.S., the U.N., the European Union and Russia.

Officials said tentative plans call for Israel, the Palestinians, the Quartet and the U.S. to release separate but near simultaneous statements saying the stalled talks will resume early next month in either the U.S. or Egypt. The U.S. statement is expected to be issued in Clinton's name.

Crowley declined to comment on the arrangements but said that if "we reach the point we hope to arrive at ... we will demonstrate our support for the process and we will outline specifics of where we go from here."

Under a scenario now being finalized, the officials said Israel, the Palestinians, the Quartet of Mideast peacemakers and the United States would release separate but near simultaneous statements saying the stalled talks will resume early next month in either the U.S. or Egypt.


The State Department comment came after last week Haaretz quoted a senior U.S. official saying Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was about to announce the start of direct peace negotiations with Israel in "a matter of days."

"A number of minor details need to be clarified with Abbas and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that will open the way for direct talks," the official said at the time.

Contrary to the optimism in Washington, however, Israeli officials were trying to show toughness regarding preconditions, with one official saying that "Israel is not willing to agree to any preconditions from the back door via a Quartet announcement that will serve as a basis for the negotiations."

"As far as we know, the negotiations may begin in two days, but also in two weeks," the Israeli official added.

Abbas is demanding that the negotiations have a clear framework for the ideas that will be put in place; he also wants a commitment by Israel to cease settlement construction during the direct talks.

The Palestinian leader told Mitchell that the Quartet would reiterate its declaration from March that included a call for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and an end to the occupation that began in 1967.

There would be the establishment of an independent Palestinian state and an end to settlement construction. In addition, residents of Jerusalem would not be expelled from their homes and the two sides would not take any unilateral steps.

Palestinian sources said Mitchell did not reject the suggestions.

Speaking with Haaretz last week, the senior U.S. official said it was still unclear whether President Barack Obama would take part in the inauguration or whether the parties would be invited to Washington for a ceremony.

According to the Israeli official, the ceremony would be held in Egypt under the auspices of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak; the United States would be represented by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Over the weekend international leaders pressured Abbas to announce this week the resumption of direct negotiations.

Meanwhile, a senior Fatah official, Azam al-Ahmed, who is accompanying Abbas on a visit to Qatar, said on Saturday that the Palestinian Authority would announce on Sunday or Monday its position on resuming direct talks with Israel.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 13. 0 0
    shades of oslo...
    • e l pratt
    • 19.08.10
    • 23:19

    Looks like the arm-twisting will begin again soon. First the coercion, then the imposed peace treaty. Wahoo! Here comes the anti-Christ!

  • 12. 0 0
    Close Is In Horse Shoes And Hand
    • Brazen
    • 19.08.10
    • 23:05

    grenades. The p.a. will pull something out of his bag of tricks to sabatage their future.

  • 11. 0 0
    Talk is just talk
    • Bob
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:56

    If you think Israel is going to devided Jerulsalem, expel more Jews from their homes, and make a permanate border on '67 line, you are dreaming. Do the Pals still have "martyr" posters up? Forget peace. Build Israel!

  • 10. 0 0
    Talk is just talk
    • Bob
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:56

    If you think Israel is going to devided Jerulsalem, expel more Jews from their homes, and make a permanate border on '67 line, you are dreaming. Do the Pals still have "martyr" posters up? Forget peace. Build Israel!

  • 9. 0 0
  • 8. 0 0
    One State solution is the best for all.
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:33

    No israel, No Palestine. One State Solution is the best for all. One Man, One Vote, Equality for all inhabitants. Equal Pay for Equal Work, Equal Water Rights. No Apartheid, No Segregation...A Very True Secular Democrac Let us call it: “State of Holy Land”.

  • 7. 0 0
    will it be serious and honest negotiation or another waste of time?
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:31

    The State Department said an agreement was very, very close but that details were still being worked out. only time will tell us the truth.

  • 6. 0 0
  • 5. 0 0
    Even Theodore Herzl, instrumental in the creation of modern day Israel...
    • Smadar
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:23

    declared and understood that a collective goal of support was essential in establishing a state within the Middle East - in this case, a state for the Jewish people. Likewise, the same is applicable for the Palestinians, a state for the Palestinian people. Herzl stated, " I consider the Jewish question neither a social nor a religious one... It is a national question, and to solve it we must first of all establish it as an international political problem to be discussed and settled by the civilized nations of the world in council."

  • 4. 64 0
    Another peace inititive.
    • badger
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:22

    Israel will never allow meaningful peace talks. Never. The Israelis will provoke an incident or incidents and finis peace talks.

  • 3. 0 0
    Pre-1967 borders is a must..
    • Sephardi
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:21

    ..but Nathan-you-know-who will never accept that.

  • 2. 0 0
    I'll believe it when I see it
    • Logios
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:20

    In order to estimate Israeli flexibility, we need to look into the Council of Seven (senior ministers) that will make the decision. Netanyahu is one of them, and I am willing to believe that all of his "principles", other than the "prime principle" of staying in office, are subject to change due to pressure. Right now there is enough pressure: Labor will quit the coalition if there are no peace talks by September, when the "building freeze" ends and the Palestinians give up on the talks. Labor's departure will render the coalition effectively ungovernable, so elections will probably have to be held in 2011. Other than Netanyahu, the Seven include 2 moderates (Barak, Meridor), and Yishai of Shas, who cares really about Jerusalem only and not the West Bank, so he may vote yes. Of the 3 hard-liners, Lieberman will probably object, but may not quit the government because he is facing a possible indictment for corruption, and being a minister makes it harder to decide to indict him. We are left with two sincere hard-liners, Begin and Yaalon. I think here is Netanyahu's main problem. These two are sincere, and rather non-politicians. If they say "no way" to the Quartet's terms (which include construction freeze and 1967 borders as the basis for negotiations), Netanyahu may face a real rebellion in the Likud, as Sharon did when he evacuated Gaza. Netanyahu is not as strong as Sharon and not as respected. The rebellion might kill him. The only way out, that I see, is that the US will come up with a "clarification" of the Quartet declaration that will make the deal edible for Israel and for Abbas as well. But this leaves us where we were last week. The joy may be too premature.

  • 1. 0 0
    'very close'
    • Noel
    • 19.08.10
    • 22:16

    WHAT A TRAGIC WASTE OF TIME