Palestinians demand immediate statehood to counter Israeli 'unilateralism'
Raising the stakes in the deadlock over stalled peace talks, Saeb Erekat said it was clear from the latest announcement of building plans in East Jerusalem and Ariel that Israel wants settlements, not peace.
By ReutersIsrael's plan to build new homes in East Jerusalem and the West Bank should be countered by international recognition of a Palestinian state, the chief Palestinian negotiator said on Tuesday.
Raising the stakes in the deadlock over stalled peace talks, Saeb Erekat said it was clear from the latest announcement of building plans that Israel wants settlements, not peace.
|
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat in a file photo. |
| Photo by: Dan Keinan |
"Israeli unilateralism is a call for immediate international recognition of the Palestinian state," he said in a statement.
The world paid little attention when the late Yasser Arafat declared a Palestinian state in 1988. But political winds have shifted and Israel today is seriously concerned that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas might win recognition.
Abbas has floated the idea of "going to the United Nations" to declare statehood as one option if peace talks collapse, but only after first seeking support from Washington.
Israel on Monday announced plans to build 1,300 new housing units on occupied land near Jerusalem, and on Tuesday, Haaretz reported that a further 800 units were planned in the big settlement of Ariel in the northern West Bank.
The building plans were made public as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was in the United States to discuss ways to revive Middle East peace talks that have stalled over the issue of settlement building.
The United States said it was "deeply disappointed" by Monday's news of the housing project which is "counterproductive to our efforts to resume direct negotiations between the parties", State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was expected to raise the issue in a meeting with Netanyahu in New York on Thursday.
Direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians broke down in September almost as soon as they had begun, after Netanyahu rebuffed Palestinian demands to extend a partial freeze on West Bank settlement building.
Noting that the controversial housing announcement was made while Netanyahu was in the United States, Crowley said: "It could very well be that somebody in Israel has made this known in order to embarrass the prime minister and to undermine the process".
Washington was outraged in March when settlement housing plans were announced with what looked like defiant timing as U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was visiting Jerusalem.
Israeli Interior Ministry spokeswoman Efrat Orbach said Monday's announcement was simply another procedural stage. "It can take months or years from this point until building can actually begin," she said.
The Palestinians dismissed this explanation.
"Israel's settlement enterprise ... is nothing but a premeditated process to kill the possibility of an independent Palestinian state," Erekat said.
Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad embarked on a two-year plan in 2009 to construct the complete institutional framework of a state by mid-2011. It has won European Union backing and warnings from Israeli analysts that Fayyad should be taken seriously.
"I firmly believe this can happen, that it will happen. We need to build up a sense of inevitability about this. I think it will happen next year," Fayyad told Reuters in an interview earlier this month.
"The more it is seen to be inevitable, the more likely it will get to a resolution," he added.
The prospect of the United States recognising an independent Palestine without the agreement of Israel seems very remote. But Israeli analysts speculate that President Barack Obama could threaten to abstain rather than veto a UN resolution if he believes Israel is obstructing the path to a peace treaty.
A World Bank report last month said that if the Palestinian Authority keeps up its "performance in institution-building and delivery of public services, it is well-positioned for the establishment of a state at any point in the near future".
Israel captured East Jerusalem, along with the West Bank, in the 1967 Six-Day War and regards all of Jerusalem as its capital, including the two neighborhoods where new housing has been approved.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Thank God the Palestinians have no authority to demand anything of anyone other than their own people. May the Lord forgive them for their arrogance.
Why should Israel make any concessions to a peace process that is unlikely to succeed; as it has not succeeded for the last 60 years? Why expect success this time? Moreover, Hamas is not in the game so the result of discussions with West Bank Palestine alone cannot bring peace to all the parties; and two out of three ain't good enough. The Palestinians cannot even make peace among themselves. So what is the purpose of the discussion? And Oh by the way what about a concesion on Shalit? What about Israel's right to exist as a free and independent Jewish nation? If God willing by some unlikely miracle a Peace agreement were to be achieved I would fear for the settlers. What will they be required to do then? If I were a settler I would be building fortress walls around the facilities.
"Israel's settlement enterprise ... is nothing but a premeditated process to kill the possibility of an independent Palestinian state," Erekat said. The Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat is right on point and what he said has been previously by others , including Menachem Begin's own son Binyamin in the following: "In strategic terms, the settlements (in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza) are of no importance." What makes them important, he added, was that "they constitute an obstacle, an unsurmountable obstacle to the establishment of an independent Arab State west of the river Jordan." --Binyamin Begin, Thus, Erekat and Palestinian officials are right to push for an international counter to Israel contin-ued aggression in East Jerusalem to build more housing units by demanding immediately recog- nizing of a Palestinian state. People are fed up with Israeli aggression and its officials have loss international credibility to be fair and just in their negotiations to bring forth a Pale- stinian state... Hence the UN body must act before there is utter outrage in the streets denoucing Israel , the burn- ing of its flag, the boycotting of its officials & calls to cut off its aid and the handling of Israeli goods and services worldwide....Dutch
And once it does, if Israel doesn't accept it and prevents it's establishment...the boycotts will start, and the U.S. will only be able to protect Israel for so long before it becomes too much of a burden on its international image and standing. UNSC sanctions will be destined to follow with a U.S. abstention.
They'd better accept any deal, while there is land left to call a Palelestinian State. At the rate the Pals have refused generous "gifts" even after being defeated time and time again. It goes to show that they are not the most "clever" people in the world. They have rejected concession after concession, time and time again. Amazing
2100 in a week? Can you imagine how much that is? Thats about 5000 people, a small town. One of those every week? Two weeks? And new homes for 5000 people are barely even mentioned, in a left-leaning paper, that just goes show the extent of the settlement building. This is full scale colonialisation.
Netanyahu is not trying to hide his contempt for peace, why wait any longer?.
The West will complain, the UN will denounce and there will be negative consequences; in the SHORT TERM. We are already hated by the Muslim world simply for being here on 'their land' anyway and naive hope in non existant good will gained from not doing this is pure fantasy nonsense at this point. At this time the world is filled with starving BILLIONS and the pressure of those who want will only increase. If we are going to actually persevere we need to be strong enough to survive, in this world for the LONG RUN. The security gained from a cohesive homogenius population on a small but now defendable territory would give us the strength to do that which no one intelligent or wise would dare do now; let down our guard enough to make the real sacrifices that would be necessary to make a real peace. This is not the paradox it may seem to some. A long term survival will require TWO things to exist at the same time. The strength to defend, OURSELVES and the capacity therefor to succesfully negotiate a viable long and hopefully permanent PEACE from a position of relative security. The fearful make for trembling and suspicious peace! One made in confidence that one is not likely to be lightly assaulted will be one of far more confidence. Yes PEACE. AS though the options open are merely two opposite IMPOSSIBLE absurdities. Endless war or capitulation! There should be no doubt however to create peace we must have effectively achieved our minimal requirements for this long term survival. WE must be satisfied with what we have and forever after change our policies to that end. As in all struggles for survival; and no other land or people in the world live in such a threatened and isolated part of the world as we do, desire for peace can never substitute for the hard steps that are sometimes necessary to make these hopes more than pious dreams. What this means is coming clean and finishing with hidden agendas. Both left and right know this about the situation and so the only political options are two opposite impossible ones; which inevitably becomes the corruption and paralysis to politics in action. SO the only solution is the cutting of the Gordian knot. This will politically reward left and right. The patriots get Greater Israel; removing the whole complex of problems of the settler, apartheid situation while making the nation a viable contigous land of sufficiant size to MAYBE survive a future war. The left would win in the long run as there would no longer be any other possible political move than sincere and bold moves towards not just a cease fire but a step by step process of building sincere and diplomatic situation. The left would also find their position vs corruption and the exploitation of the many by the greedy few would cease as all would be lanf owners and more reliant on each other. The war profiteers and ultra wealthy would find it harder to motivate thier obscene wealth. THis would maybe put us in a position half way between the old Kibbutz spirit of socialism and the overdone capitalist greed that have flourished in the never ending impasse of the reality of Israeli politics these last decades. Everyone on both left/right divide must recognise the truth of what I say. I do not HATE palestinian people. I hate more those Jews who are arrogant and brutal against them and enjoy it. But these people are individuals and no more THE Jew, than the suicide bomber is THE Arab. Both left and right are wrong. Morally the right are often more immoral for their cynicism and devious corruption; which while tactically effective corrupt the soul and will to act decisivly even in the ares when they know they are right. The right are going to have to give up their hatred and ATONE for it. THis is right and true and part of our deepest traditions and insights. THey must conquer fear and greed. The left are simply absurd, like children at a student rally; they are passionate and often moral and good hearted but they are like city children dropped into a jungle; who want to play mowgli and dnace with a tiger. The problem is no ADULT can really believe this absurdity that the tiny uncontigous half nation can by giving up more land stop a hatred by BILLIONS against us just for the very fact of our existance! This is taking LSD, holding hands, closing your eyes and wishing the pentagon would just float away naivete. The hard part will be the middle term; as we have to withstand the waves of condemnation that would at first seem overwhelming. But not only will it pass; if we truelly do change from a hidden to an open agenda but it will in the end disappear as essentially the situation will be as before; simply with us being twice our present size. We will however be no longer desiring more and our behavour will prove this. Thus in the long run we will get the best of both left and right rather than this slow bleeding to death of the worst of the left and right. We will hopefully be the last to do this but it is necessary for us; the people wandering for 2,000 years. If not emigrate.
Let me get this straight "The prospect of the United States recognising an independent Palestine without the agreement of Israel seems very remote." but Israel can defy US wishes at any time. It seems pretty clear who wears the trousers in the US/Isreal relationship.
Israel unilaterally declared itself a state back in 1948. The partition resolution in the UN General Assembly was only a non-binding resolution and had no teeth. It is past time for the Palestinians to declare their state on ALL the land occupied in 1967.
Since they have not had a real interest in fair negotiations since day 1 - do it unilaterally: finish the border fence; make sure there are no entrances to Israel; ban all work permits and instead give them to the African refugees who truly want peace and only a better life away from Muslims that only want to kill them; stop assistance to the pali infrastructure. Given the trillions donated by the euros and the USA, they can use the money to build their roads, their schools and their own medical facilities (if the Swiss will let them have their money back); they have ports of entry so let them use them; hold a referendum to exchange the Arab triangle of the Galilee for the settlements dunam for dunam so no one can yell someone got less - let's be real the Galilee Arabs have been fighting for pali rule for years although they are no in the "be careful what you wished for" part; and most of all, let the palis know that since they are now a sovereign entity, ANY acts of terrorism regardless of which pali group conducts it is an act of war and will quickly be responded to accordingly. Here come the thumbs down! -)
Israel can annex what it wants , give no passage through gaza and still remain as occupying force on jordan river and any security areas until there is a comprehensive peace. There is already a defacto state in gaza. what is left of the west bank will eventually reunite or associate with jordan. Who will make them leave?
It is no longer the case that Israel needs the West Bank for security reasons so it should give up most of it not including E. Jerusalem just as it gave up Gaza. Israeli settlers in the West Bank can decide it they want to stay or get out. If the the West Bank leaders expel them, then Israel can expel Palestinians from East Jerusalem. If Palestinians attack Israeli citizens in the West Bank there will be serious abd broad based repurcussions. In the end the settlers will leave on their own. The best thing that can happen to israel is for the Palestinians to take over and decide how they want to treat the settlers. At that point talk of peace becomes irrelevant. Obama can get back to worrying about more important things for Americans. Israel is an expensive diverson for the US through no fault of Israel.
Yesterday the Obama administration announced that it's embassy will remain in Tel Aviv which the US recognises as the capital of Israel. At the same time, the administration announced that they would be opening their embassy in Palestine in East Jerusalem which the US and EU recognise as the capital of Palestine. Israel opposes this move and is trying to stop it but has no support in the international community.
where is goldstone the jerk? where are all of the international press retractions? HUH???? WHERE????? Just like jenin, once again, the worlds press are proven to be fools by hamas...hamas uses them and they just report lies without any facts.... Israel always said it was 700-800 dead terrorists and some 300 killed as collateral damage from being human shields. Where are the apologies and retractions ?????????????
"Hamas confirmed for the first time on Monday that between 200 and 300 members of the organization's military wing were killed during Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip at the end of 2008, Israel Radio reported." - Haartez// Right after the war, Hamas claimed 1,444 fatalities in Cast Lead, while B'tselem verified (after interviews etc.) 1387 dead, of whom 330 took part in the hostilities and an additional 36 dead where it could not be determined if they took part in the hostilities. The issue for Goldstone was not this, but the attack on policemen, 99 of whom were killed in the initial bombing, and overall, Goldstone claims about 240 police were killed. (B'tselem verified 248 killed in police stations.) Goldstone reports on the police: "The Mission finds that, while a great number of the Gaza policemen were recruited among Hamas supporters or members of palestinian armed groups, the Gaza police were a civilian law-enforcement agency. The Mission also concludes that the [99] policemenn killed on 27 December 2008 (initial bombings) cannot be said to have been taking a direct part of hostilities and thus did not lose their civilian immunity from direct attack.." Hamas' figures are not in conflict with anything known and are no surprise. They certainly don't contradict anything Goldstone said. Note that even if we accept that policemen were also militant, and take the 36 questionable militants killed to be militant, there were 614 "militants" killed, which constitutes 44.3% of total killed. This is not the same as "at least 50 percent of the Palestinian casualties had been Hamas operatives", which Netanyahu just claimed in the US, and demanded an apology from Goldstone. I think Netanyahu owes Goldstone an apology for misrepresenting his rather accurate findings.
Why do you always insist on proving the other person wrong and slinging insults rather than devoting more of your considerable "Bear" energy to calming the situation and working for a solution?
Goldstone did the brave and difficult thing by calling it the way it was. Not the way he'd like for it to be, like you are. Talking Tough is Chicken Stuff. Do the right thing BEAR JEW, stand up for the oppressed,.....or are you Chicken!
And the numbers of civilian dead haven't changed, only the number of Hamas operatives...the total number goes up...civilian deaths aren't reduced by this disclosure
A Muslim President can do no less than deliver Jerusalem to Islam. At least he is true to his Islamic religion, which is more than can be said of left-wing Jews.
It is clear Obama is not a Muslim, no matter how many times the lie is repeated. Just because soemone stands for a just resolution is not in any way evidence he is a muslim, I am an atheist and agree with Obamas approach. I sincerely hope he does recognise Palestine.
And if Obama violates the 1994 Jerusalem Embassy Act by recognizing a PA capital in Jerusalem, he will be impeached and removed from office - and he knows it.
i hope not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
there is no possible deal with any proposition put forward ! think of all those unwra people out of work if abbas goes to the un !
"The Hundred Years' War (French: Guerre de Cent Ans) was a series of separate wars lasting from 1337 to 1453 between two royal houses for the French throne". According to your logic, this war should still be going on... Perhaps the Crusaders should also have given up earlier..
12% of the "original" Palestine? Approx 97% of the ORIGINAL TURKISH TERRITORY of Palestine is now known as Lebanon,Syria, Iraq and Jordan.The other 3% is the State of Israel, including the West Bank, formerly OCCUPIED by JORDAN. So what is this 12% you are talking about?
"Raising the stakes in the deadlock over stalled peace talks" have had affected the peace process in 40 years despite Israel have had attended several demands for the neighbors. With regards all have been done, what the neighbors have done except to obstructing the path to a peace treaty?
Israel has total control over its neighbors and the US has reduced the Palestinians to defenseless beggars. You ask Israel to give up power, land, aquifer and their welfare check. You can ask nothing from the Palestinians as they have nothing. ---------------It's not a negotiation--------------------------US should pay and pay and pay for what they have done
is simply turn its back on the Middle East and never look back. Israel has no oil, and the PA has even less. WE HAVE NO INTERESTS THERE!!! The Israelis disdain us, and the PA doesn't trust us. Aside for U.S. politicians who get fat checks from pro-Israeli groups, the rest of us couldn't care less about it. Take that money out of the equation, and you solve the Middle East problem...it becomes just another squabble in some God forsaken corner of the earth that nobody cares about. How do you say "Sudan" in Hebrew?
Israel needs to give up the settlements with a small land exchange of decent land to the Palestinians for that which Israel keeps. Israel furthermore needs to provide some sort of compensation to refugees and acknowledge the country's role in creating them in the first place. Jerusalem must be an international city that is open to all. Palestinians must give up the right of return to Israel proper, accept that Jerusalem belongs to everyone and at the end of the day they need to be the loudest Arab voice advocating normalized relations with Israel. That and they need to stop spreading false info (what massacre at Jenin?) in their ongoing efforts to see Israel replaced by Palestine. If there is to be no Greater Israel (makes sense), there should be no Historic Palestine, for each precludes the others ability to survive.
There is a real danger for the pals here in that israel may just annex all of area C and B and leave A to the PA. Then we have a bunch of gaza style prisons in the WB. Then when the prisoners get mad at this and try to fight back, israel uses the same techniques as with gaza using the same excuse.
and no Israeli income tax money transfer of $55mm/m ; that will be the end of any Palestinian State. Absorbe all the other Palestinians refuges into the WB from Jordan and Lebanon? Can't do it economically - demographic immigrant explosion - disaster. Jews look after their co-religionists, not Muslims. Abbas is whistling by the cemetary.
The us can split the aid it gives Israel annually between the two states and there won't be a problem!
the palestinians have for too long been deceived by a sly israel. the palestinians should get their own state straight away. negotiating with israel will not bring them any fruits. further waiting will not be their advantage.
Sophism is all one can get from the Palestinians: they use the housing issue (built on Israel land and capital, by the way) to deflect attention from its incapacity to reach true peace. They had 10 months to make a decision, none was made; they have the opportunity to have a state, but none is built; they consciously cling to impossible conditions knowing they will never be met because they acknowledge their lack of ability to manage a statehood (the relationship between Fatah and Hamas is the very proof of it). Mr. Erikat and its mates lack political will yet try to conceal, period.
"We are building on occupied land that does not belong to us" don't you understand? I am an American Jew, who believes Israel has betrayed its heritage!
As a committed Zionist I am appalled and disgusted at the Israeli government and every decision made since Olmert til now. GIVE THE TERRITORIES BACK and rise above the petty politics. We want peace and freedom for all of the people in the region.
are not the 3 weeks over yet? are not you going to give the "peace" process another (1000000) chance? why do not declare that state and its borders for the world to recoginze it first, for starters, duh? Erikat, although, you, Fayyad, Ahmad Qurei, Abu Mazen, had, over the yeas, made such rehotric remarks, the Zionists never waivered on their way, while, you , look like complete morons...try to act like a man, not just talking like one, for change, Erikat? will you?
with the only nice guys left. The farther east you go the more radical the Moslems are. If Natan gets his way and expel the Palestinians, he will have to deal with a none ending war. Jihadist will be coming from all over the Islamic world to fight Israel. Egypt will not be able to explain Israel's behavior to its citizens. Some regimes that the west has spent years and treasure to shore up will be lost to popular anger. In short the US cannot fight all your battles, and definitely not this one. The American people are watching and they know what got them into Iraq and Afghanistan. It is time that Israel use some prudence and it will take it a long way. Many people in the Middle east are waiting for a chance to say "Welcome to the Area" Israel. But they cannot say it out loud till the issue with the Palestinians is resolved. If the Palestinians are expelled, all moderate voices will vanish.
But if you are not Israel would have to defend itself!
Saeb Erekat can demand what he likes . So did Arafat . The existing Palestinian leaders are all hasbeens. It's time for the younger leaders to take control it's ther destiny. Let the settlers build negociate who knows the Palestinians might land up inheritting thousands of settlers who will have to live under their control.
Let the Palestinians go ahead. They will have to absorb all the refugees and any war started by that state eg Palestine can legitimately be met by armed force.
How many more wars can Israel win? What happens when Israel eventually loses? Isn't a much smaller Israel better than no Israel at all?
Israel can't loose. Hasn't it occupied much of Lebanon since 1982? Wasn't Hisbollah destroyed in 2006, and Hamas in 2009?
Must the US and EU be exposed to a third incident where Israel declares yet more housing units to be built on Palestinian land making a viable state an impossibility? Or will they go on with this diplomatic language which Israel only scorns and laughs in the face of the leaders from the international community. There is no other option but for the palestinians to declare their state within the borders that the world recognises as being those of Palestine and a shard capital in Jerusalem. If this conflict is left to fester and this zionist intransigence allowed to go on unabated, then we will have a global problem on our hands and it will be Israel's doing.
declare the disbanding of the Palestinian Authority....in one full swoop, we will have a ONE STATE SOLUTION...
Its clear that the pals don’t care about Israel's Security all they want is their vision of what their state should look like... So the only Answer is for Israel to Adhere to resolution 242 as much as possible... dismantle the outposts.... keep the settlements... (Basically pull back to our side of the fence)... that way they pals can get the outskirts of Jerusalem (southern Ramallah) and the pals get their state... This is the only real way to advance peace... For peace can only be negotiated by two countries...
As if would be a clear violation of resoution 242!!!
when you are strong U write your own law. Right now Israel is a strong country. Who care what UN say. Israel is having power to change British law then who care about UN law. As long America is there Israel can have a merry time
If the Palestinians are unwilling to negotiate an end of the conflict, Israel can withdraw to any interim boundaries it wants to. Interntional law goes both ways and there is no requirement to end the occupation without an end to the conflict. Declaration of a Palestinian State without negotiating boundaries is a disadvantage to Palestine. The refugees become Palestinian citizens and lose their claims on Israel (except for financial compensation) and the conflict becomes a border dispute. Eventually, the Intl community will call upon the Pals to stop whining and negotiate the borders. While, this appears to be a win-win for the Pals, it is clearly a lose-lose for the Pals. In addition, if the Kossova model applies, the Pals will have to offer citizenship to all residents at the time of the declaration (Kossova ended up with a Serbian minority) and the settlers would have to be offered citizenship - leaving Palestine with an armed hostile minority that would have all the rights under the Human Rights Initiative guaranteed by the UN.
I am quite sure if everything goes the way you think it would, then the Israeli Jewish Settlers would be treated no better and no worse than israel has treated its Arab Minority :0) (wink wink, nod nod)....what goes around comes around. If you follow the peace talks, the one thing Israel never ever wants to do is NEGOTIATE BORDERS.....please...the Palestinians have begged Israel for years to negotiate the borders....
Simple reason why no Israeli Settlers can remain in a new Palestinian state. The IDF would be forever intervening on their behalf. This would prevent peace and undermine the legitimacy of any border. This is particularly relevant if Palestine is to be demilitarized.
"If the Palestinians are unwilling to negotiate an end of the conflict, Israel can withdraw to any interim boundaries it wants to." .... and the territory BEHIND that interim boundary will still be OCCUPIED TERRITORY, Reid. Your "solution" changes nothing, because there is no mechanism - None At All - that allows an occupier to unilaterally annex occupied territory to itself.
Israel has become more aggressive in eroding Palestine and denying the Palestinians their legally entitled human rights. Meaningless rhetoric spouts from the mouths of Netanyahu and Lieberman. It is time for aggressive action on the part of Palestine, the Quartet and the Arab nations. Israel's has abused its original United Nations land grant and continues to abuse International Law. Unilateral declaration of statehood with UN Security Council is now appropriate.
Right Now the Pals produce one story after another. The Fact is Jordan captured Jerusalem from the Israelis is 1948. and kicked out all Jews. In 1967 Israel recaptured THEIR LAND Back from Jordan
if they dont want to declare Israel as a state because they did so in 1993... why would they need to re-declare a state today?
If Netanyahoo Gov. does not want or UNABLE to Negociate Peace Settlement due to Xtreme Pressures from within, then the inevitable path of Unilateral Declaration of Independence, is unfortunately the ONLY logical step to be taken, after such a long, L O N G occupation.
The reason the 1988 declaration got nowhere was that it was for a state in line with the 1947 UN partition plan. It ignored Israel's own declaration and its acceptance by the UN and tried to roll history back to before the 1948 War. That kind of thing will go nowhere.
you say they tied to roll back history to before 1948... and that was imposible becuase of the facts on the ground... How has that changed?
The Palestinian Declaration 1988 did not mention borders, as Israeli declaration did not. And it mentions Resolution 181 just for the "legitimacy" of their state, as the Israeli declaration does. (Indeed, the Palestinian declaration is an adaptation of the Israeli one (to a shameful degree of plagiarism.) Many states recognized Palestine (1988), but not the West or the UN. Now all are ready to do so. Start thinking, Jonathan, a new situation requires NEW thinking.
The 1988 state was terminated when they sign the home rule agreement.
The Palestinians continue to celebrate their "independence day", and the states that recognized them continue to have their ambassadors. If you know of any international ruling that implies their state was "terminated", better notify the Palestinians to save them a holiday. I suspect that they will not have another formal declaration, but just ask the UN to recognize them and then admit them as members. (In my opinion, they should have a new declaration, and this time with an original text and no plagiarism.)
"International law is the term commonly used for referring to laws that govern the conduct of independent nations in their relationships with one another." You can't have both an independent state and home rule at the same time. PLO declared and independent state in 1988 and compromised on home rule in 1993. So the independent state was terminated in the same way the independent state of Faroe Islands was terminated when they sign a new home rule agreement whit Denmark.
The rule of thumb for theorists is that when theory contradicts reality, the theorist should check and (perhaps?) modify his theory. But since you seem so convinced, check reality. But you MUST check something! Alternatively, why not notify the Palestinians to stop celebrating their "independence day", and notify the 90 or so countries that have their ambassadors to send them home. Just let THEM grapple with your logic, but please leave me out of it.
First, one should look at the THREAT of a unilateral declaration of an independent Palestinian state. This certainly advances the peace talks, because while Netanyahu seems paralyzed, the US and the Europeans may not be and they will put pressure on Israel to move. They know that a declaration of independence will complicate the international situation. Note that in order to be credible, the Palestinians must be actually willing to do the declaration. (Obama especially is inclined towards payback to Netanyahu for causing trouble before the US elections.) Second, such a declaration of Palestine independence will only take place if the peace process is stuck. In this case, a declaration is simply better than doing nothing. At least it will lead to shaking up the diplomatic situation, get the Palestinians into the UN (without a US veto), and increase pressure for a settlement. Recall that Sadat's goal in the 1973 war was exactly such a shake-up, and he ended up getting his land back.
State or no State, shake-up or no shake-up Israel will not give up Jerusalem.
Then the hard part begins: Running the state, governing, etc... Oh yeah, you will have to work out the borders with Israel and Jordan too.
As we go now with israelis tired of inner fighting about clericalism, fascism, racism, oportunism, corruption, etc, people are tired and are not ready anymore to fight for general human values. Thus when it comes to the jewish-arab conflict no acceptable solution is in vieu. The only possibility left is a one state for both people with a secular constitution based of perfect equality between all citizens.
which will then lead to civil war, which will then necessitate separating the populations, which will then result in two separate states, but only after considerably more bloodshed. So dream about a utopian bi-national state if you're ready for that! scdescee ses
A couple of things cool-headed people need to consider: 1. The UN has already granted international legitimacy to a Palestinian state via its resolution on partition from 1947. Therefore, a Palestinan state can, theoretically, be declared and established at any time. That it has not done so for over 60 years is a result of expulsions, flight, war, politics, internal Arab machinations and occupation. 2. The Israelis are either, as the article states, more interested in land grabbing than peace (and much justification for this can be found) or are simply totally oblivious cocncerning the Palestinian view of the situation. Settlement building to them is (roughly) equivalent to the Israeli view of Palestinian violence. If the latter must refrain from violence, then the Palestinians feel the Israelis must obstain from further building in contested territory. To them, it is an act of violence aginst their people. The Israeli security thesis is weak. It is controversial among the Israeli security elite, and if Israel truly looked to the settlements as a security bulwark, they would have established mostly military outposts there, and not civilian settlements populated in large measure by middle-class, secular commuters who will flee at the earliest signs of danger (remember the days leading up to the 1991 Gulf War)?
the un has never ever endorsed a palestinian state on the 1922 mandate territory, but the british created arab palestine in what is now jordan ! there is no contested territory !
Apparently you never read it - it had the deadline for acceptance. Kindly read it...
Jabo, I usually read your comments with a grin, but this time you have really shown, and publicly, your total ignorance of history. UN resolution 181 advocated a Jewish State and a Palestinian State. Also, UN Resolutions which followed supported the return of refugees to their homes. Some things are unpleasant to acknowledge, but the facts remain as they are. All types of legal shenanagans have allowed the relevant resolutions to remain unfulfilled, but one can easily recognize what thier spirit says. The whole issue of Jordan as Palestine is irrelevant to the discussion about the Mandate and UN Resolutions concerning it.
Please tell me what happend imediatly after UN rsolution 181?May I point to you that there were noPalestinian Refugees at that point. May i point to you hat Jewish people accepted partition, Declared state on the territory that was allocated to them, And stretch the arm of Peace to all the neighbors. ( Read declaration of Independance of the state of Israel.)
In actual fact Israel declared a state within the borders allotted but immediately seized a lot of land outside those borders and began "encouraging" the inhabitants of the land to leave both inside and outside of its lawful borders. The Israeli state clearly intended to seize the entire mandate from that moment - and that intention has never been disavowed, to the contrary, it seems as strong as ever today. The neighboring states invaded, not Israel, but the neighboring mandate land outside of Israels lawful borders, to prevent this occupation. Israel has from that day forward occupied and claimed land that was never and is not inside her borders. Both sides are open to criticism, and therefore any even-handed observer has to criticise both sides. Yet it seems for far too many Israelis any criticism of the other side, whether true, half-true, or fabrication, is immediately accepted as true, while every criticism of Israel is dismissed out of hand, without bothering to check if it is true or not. Brothers, this is not the way to peace.
Res. 181 proposed one Arab state and one Jewish state, never a Palestinian state. And res. 181 was only a proposal that expired on 15. May 1948
Kan, first, thank you for your comments which I appreciate. I also thank you for your tone which is respectful, without so many of the diatribes and insults many on this Talk-Back use. To the point: It is clear that if the UN was in favor of a Jewish State and, as you say, an Arab state in so-called Palestine, it meant that in effect it was in favor of a state for the Arabs of Palestine, i.e. a Palestinian state. We don't need to go any further on that point. As to expiry: yest the Mandate expired on May 15, 1948, but the validity of the UN Resolution did not expire. It has never been formally repealed (to my knowledge). In any case, my point is that a Palestinian Arab state has already been given the blessings of the International Community and has never been revoked by that Community.
Immeditaley after the vote on UN Res 181, Palestinian civilians were starting to be expelled from towns and villages. Most palestinian refugees obtained that status even before the entrance of Arab armies in May 1948. An interesting sideline is that with the few exceptions by Egypt and Syria, the Arab armies did not enter those areas of the former Mandate allocated to the Jewish State, but rather entered those areas allocated to the Palestinian state. Please review historical sources confirming this, especially from books by Benny Morris et al who used Israeli archive material hitherto classified (i.e. statements by Israeli politicians and field commanders) for their conclusions.
In 1947 it was the Jews who where Palestinians, Arabs was South - Syrians. On May 15. 1948 Both Arabs and Jews becomes Israeli. They name Palestinians was “free”. After June 1967 Jordanian citizen on WB start to cal them self Palestinians. Un didnot allocated land to a arab state, UN only proposed.
get it straight it aint never going to happen ! take note labhras !
I must diasagree with you. The UN, according to your logic then, also RECOMMENDED the establishment of a Jewish state and did not allocate land. However, the truth is that the UN Resolution is based on the establishment of 2 separate states in the former Britsh mandate of Palestine. Also, Palestinian national consciousness, while indeed not fully developed in the first part of thee 20th century, did start to grow as the Jewish population increased prior to WW2. You will also notice that the PLO was established some years before 1967, and Fatah even before that. Obviously then there was a well- established Palestinian consciousness by that time.
17: "Apparently you never read it - it had the deadline for acceptance." The Partition Plan was an **OFFER** that the Palestinians had to **ACCEPT** by a certain date? You're kidding, right? The Arabs of Palestine were not asked for their assent, nor were they told that the "offer" would expire by a certain date. They were **TOLD** what their portion of the assets would be, and those assets are still theirs, even to this very day...
that's fine too. let Netyanhu negotiate for 20 years ... and we shall see how he resolves the demographic puzzle at that point.
Israel claim on Judea and Samaria, the West Bank was never recognized
If the Palestinians do this, what will they get? A state roughly on the 1967 borders (they won't get all the settlements, though they might get some), a part of East Jerusalem as a capital, no right of return to Israel but a right of return to the new Palestine.... ...hmmm....isn't that exactly what Israel has offered them about 5 times now? It seems like Abbas and Co. are settling for a slightly worse deal than what was offered at Camp David and Taba...but doing it because THEY get to dictate the terms. Let them go for it, once again the Palestinian leadership putting macho posturing before the needs of their people. The same result for Israel, but without the lengthy, costly negotiations.
Without a negotiated treaty they never have to give up their claims against Israel for the remaining lands or for refugees to claim their homes in Israel. It will become another non-resolved issue like all the little islands that Japan, Russia and China are disputing with each other. Without those claims resolved, the Arab League peace plan will not be triggered and Israel will never have normalization with the rest of the Arab world. It's not a good prospect for Israel.
The israeli/Palestinian conflict will only be solved by imposing a peace treaty followed by disengagement on the U.S. side. It does not make sense for America to have presence in many Arab countries and be friend to Israel at the same time. There is something wrong there and the current administration is getting to recognize it. It is never too late to disengage from full unquestionable support to Israel. Time has come for a real change for the sake of Free America.
NOT DEMANDS !!!
Raising the stakes in the deadlock over stalled peace talks, Saeb Erekat said it was clear from the latest announcement of building plans in East Jerusalem and Ariel that Israel wants settlements, not peace.
Koptenhungen all kaput for ya Achmed(A..K.A tony baloney!
Cowley said "It could very well be that somebody in Israel has made this known in order to embarrass the prime minister and to undermine the process". This lame excuse was used too many times already under similar situations. Sounds like the boy who cried wolf too many times.
.... it is an orchestrated attempt to make it seem as if all settlement activity takes place on its own volition... so what do we want from Bibi... just allow him to enjoy his family trip to AIPAC...
The last thing Obama wants is the palestinians to go direct to the UN then he finds himself in a situation where he will pay the price. Does he veto the proposed resolution angering his new buddies in the islamic world especially the Saudis who contributed generously to his election fund which most Congressmen & US jewish voters would have him do or does he allow the UN to go ahead and loose his legacy as the president that created an arab state and be left looking like an idiot in the eyes of the world while the palestinians just said don't worry Mr Obama we are not going to involve you so step aside please while we go to the UN to solve our problem. If Abbas tries going to the UN it will all be over for palestinians. The UN can't create a viable state for that they need Israel's cooperation which it wont give if the palestinians are going direct to the UN. Israel will probably retaliate by going out of its way to make life hard for this state - no territorial corridor linking the state making air travel the only method of transport between the 2 sides of the state and in a situation like that no business is ever going to invest in this state because business likes good transport links & stability. The UN cant impose solutions on things like the water ... Israel currently controls the water supplies and is not going to share valuable water with an enemy out of the goodness of its heart. The palestinians will later discover that whilst they rushed and got their state through the UN rather than taking their time and negotiating they now have a state thats not viable and without doing a few deals with Israel it will never be viable but unfortunatly for them the new reality is any palestinian president doing deals with Israel will be considered a traitor and the remains of Israels peace camp will be smashed so doing deals will be impossible for either side. The palestinians should take advantage of the fact for the first time the US president is on their side and hates Israel just as much as they do and so stop acting like children and go hold unconditional talks do that Obama will be in a position to do things for them but create a deadlock because of pre conditions or rushing to the UN and they loose that. The palestinians are headed down a suicidal path and if they go to far there will be no return and the situation will go from bad - worse.
A state thats viable will never be achieved thru negotiations.Negiotiations will only give project greater-Israel more time.
As an American taxpayer...I think that is exactly what should the US should do. Imagine...we could actually spend the $$$ now being pumped into the ME on the needs of American citizens. great plan...let's do it!
They've been waiting 62 years during which time the Israeli/USA various 'peace processes' have achieved absolutely nothing.
You are not serious. Palestinians must make compromise if they want a state. A state like Palestine has never existed and may not even exist unless they make compromise on certain issues. Palestinians are responsible for costing USA democrats the mid term election, and if the Democrats do not support Israel then they are out of office come nest election 2012.
I am afraid that you are very misinformed. The situation in the Middle East was not a factor at all in the US elections.
They will participate in the next Olympics. The event called Murdering Pregnant Women will will them the Gold Medal. And we want to award this terror entity with a State ??
For one good comment here!
It's about time! With Israel's appalling behavior and disgusting government I fully support the immediate formation of the Palestinian State. Go for it and I wish you well. BTW - I am a Zionist.
I am in total agreement with Jane and I am a Zionist.
1) Accept, in principle and through a simple declarative act, Israel's RIGHT to be, to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people, and that any peace treaty that will result from negotiations with Israel will be considered the end of the conflict and the end of all demands of it. 2) Adhere to that which they agreed with Israel and the US: direct negotiations without preconditions that will deal with all the "core issues", including "settlements" of course. Demanding now, after two sessions into the negotiations, to change the terms of reference and expecting pre-conditions to be applied is contrary to good faith approach to peace-making. Can Ereqat and his senders show the world that they can, finally, handle matters peacefully and in good faith...??
They have done so already ,Bibi keeps coming up with new creative ways to put road blocks ...lets wake up ,Israel does not want peace.
And Israel definitely did agree to freeze ALL settlement construction back in 2003. It ain't a "precondition" to insist that your negotiating partner negotiate in good faith, and the best way to show that good faith is to live up to your agreements. But it certainly **is** a precondition to insist that the other side must agree that you can dump the prior agreements and start again from square one.....
Don't wait for Washington's approval - you'll be waiting forever. Just do it now - it's the perfect timing; and with Israel showing it's true intentions to the world you have no other options left.
For Peace except threaten, bully, and terrorize. They could have had everything in 1967, yet chose war. They will now get nothing. Besides, Hamas will not honor anything that is ever agreed. Lets hope this entity is stillborn. A fake farce.
The PA has done exactly what Israel asked, bringing peace and security to the West Bank. Now what?
So I can freely walk threw the west bank on my way to the Tomb of Rachel in peace and security now?
Didn't you read the article a couple of days agostating that the most wanted list has dwindled to zero. This is a hard fact and cannot be overcome by your hollow rhetoric. Peace is west bacnk does not mean that they have enslaved themselves to Israel. peace mean no attacks on israel as long as the israilis remain on their side of the border.
So look eastward for your economic aid.
well except maybe Israel and Micro no sia. Had to come to this. This will put Israel,s refusal to make peace --right out in the open for all to see--read about for the next twenty years. Survive that Israel and you will have earned whatever you get to keep. Don,t get your hopes up though--your leaders will destroy Israel.
dismantle the PA, accept a one state solution and return all control to israel. Then you would see massive explusions of arabs out of fear of israelis being out numbered by demographics. The ugly side of israeli politics would have to show it's face in sunlight.
Since the US will almost certainly not back a declaration of statehood, it is likely that the PA will go this route. Then they can use the issue of human rights to get countries to embargo Israel. The US will be among the last on board, as they were with South Africa.
In all likelihood, that's where it is heading!
All those years while Jordan ruled the WB nobody made a peep about Palestine Now, you want it - well not enough to make concessions but certainly enough to make threats and a fuss. What has changed?
read what Israel,s leaders had to say on the matter. "In 1938, Ben-Gurion made it clear of his support for the "Jewish state" on part of Palestine was only as a stepping ground for a complete conquest. He wrote: "[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong force following the establishment of the state--we will abolish the partition of the country and we will expand to the whole Land of Israel." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 107 & One Palestine Complete, p. 403) * One day after the UN vote to partition Palestine, Menachem Begin, the commander of the Irgun gang and Israel's future Prime Minister between 1977-1983, proclaimed: "The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized .... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever." (Iron Wall p. 25) Nothing has changed while you were away .
This argument is a sham. Since you admit that Israel is there, then the people that live in the WB are therefore have the right to be represented in Israel's democracy with the same and equal rights guaranteed all Israeli citizens.
When Jordan ruled the West Bank, they did not build colonies for hashemites only. The Palestinians did not become politicized until about 1964 and certainly more so after 1967. It is true, back then, they were waiting for an Arab Country to come in there and take Israel out completely...but since then, many decades have passed and the entire civilized world understands that the Arabs can live with Israel so long as they share the land fairly with the Palestinians. It is that simple.
Ya hmar , Arab Palestine already exists, Israel is jewish Palestine. Jordan is Palestine
Why should the palestines recognize Israel if you can't recognize them?
Jordan is Jordan.
Sadly it now seems this is the ONLY way to go thanks to Israel's me me me approach to sharing the land.