• Published 15:16 03.05.10
  • Latest update 15:16 03.05.10

Obama, Netanyahu: Direct Mideast talks needed as soon as possible

Obama calls PM just hours after U.S. envoy George Mitchell arrives in Israel; Netanyahu briefs Egyptian president on plans for negotiations, expected to begin Wednesday.

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent and News Agencies Tags: Israel news Middle East peace Hosni Mubarak Benjamin Netanyahu

 

U.S. President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

U.S. President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting in the U.S. in January 2010.

Photo by: (GPO)

U.S. President Barack Obama called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday to discuss making "full use" of the upcoming indirect Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and moving to direct negotiations as soon as possible, the White House said.

Obama spoke with Netanyahu by telephone for about 20 minutes, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, as U.S. envoy George Mitchell arrived in Israel for the start of U.S.-mediated negotiations, the first Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in more than a year.

"The president spoke late this morning with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu," Gibbs said at his daily news briefing.

"They discussed how best to work together to achieve comprehensive peace in the Middle East, in particular by making full use of substantive proximity talks between Israel and the Palestinians and transitioning to direct negotiations as soon as possible."

Gibbs said the two leaders also discussed regional challenges, and that Obama "reaffirmed his unshakable commitment" to the security of Israel.
 

Obama's peace efforts received a boost on Saturday when Arab states approved four months of "proximity talks", which were expected to begin in March but suffered a delay due to Israel's announcement of a settlement project in East Jerusalem.

Defense Ministry strategist Amos Gilad said that the indirect negotiations would begin on Wednesday. It was not immediately clear when the envoy would hold talks with the Palestinian side. 

Also Monday, Netanyahu and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak conferred in Egypt's Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh about the upcoming U.S.-mediated negotiations. 
 

Netanyahu briefed Mubarak during their talks in Sharm on plans for the indirect talks. He later described their  meeting as "constructive and took place in a good atmosphere."

A senior official told Haaretz earlier Monday that Netanyahu intended to open the indirect talks with the Palestinian Authority with a discussion of the security arrangements in the West Bank and of water resources.

The official added that Netanyahu had recently asked the defense establishment and the National Security Council to elaborate on the so-called eight-points brief, which lists Israel's security demands in terms of a permanent status agreement.

Also Monday, Channel 10 reported that Industry, Trade and Labor Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, who had accompanied Netanyahu on his Sharm el-Sheikh visit, said Egypt was committed to the peace process and doing everything it can to aid in restarting it.

Despite the preparations,  some Israeli officials have voiced doubt about any breakthrough without direct negotiations.

Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor described indirect talks as "a strange affair" after face-to-face peace negotiations stretching back 16 years.


There have been no direct talks for the past 18 months, a period that has included Israel's Gaza war, election of a right-wing Israeli government and entrenched rule in the Gaza Strip by Hamas Islamists opposed to the U.S. peace efforts.

"I think it is clear to everyone that real talks are direct talks, and I don't think there is a chance of a significant breakthrough until the direct talks begin," Meridor said.


"The talks will be held. The envoy, Mitchell, will talk to us, to them. But the more we hasten to arrive at direct talks, the more we will be able to address the heart of the matter."


Nabil Abu Rdainah, a spokesman for Abbas, said the negotiations would show whether the Israeli government was serious about peace and "test the sincerity" of the Obama
administration in pursuing Palestinian statehood.


"The truth is we are not in need of negotiations. We are in need of decisions by the Israeli government. This is the time for decisions more than it is the time for negotiations," Abu Rdainah said.
 

U.S. President Barack Obama called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday to discuss making "full use" of the upcoming indirect Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and moving to direct negotiations as soon as possible, the White House said.
Obama spoke with Netanyahu by telephone for about 20 minutes, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, as U.S. envoy George Mitchell arrived in Israel for the start of U.S.-mediated negotiations, the first Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in more than a year.
"The president spoke late this morning with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu," Gibbs said at his daily news briefing.
"They discussed how best to work together to achieve comprehensive peace in the Middle East, in particular by making full use of substantive proximity talks between Israel and the Palestinians and transitioning to direct negotiations as soon as possible."
Gibbs said the two leaders also discussed regional challenges, and that Obama "reaffirmed his unshakable commitment" to the security of Israel.
Obama's peace efforts received a boost on Saturday when Arab states approved four months of "proximity talks", which were expected to begin in March but suffered a delay due to Israel's announcement of a settlement project in East Jerusalem.
Defense Ministry strategist Amos Gilad said that the indirect negotiations would begin on Wednesday. It was not immediately clear when the envoy would hold talks with the Palestinian side.
Also Monday, Netanyahu and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak conferred in Egypt's Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh about the upcoming U.S.-mediated negotiations.

Netanyahu briefed Mubarak during their talks in Sharm on plans for the indirect talks. He later described their meeting as "constructive and took place in a good atmosphere."
A senior official told Haaretz earlier Monday that Netanyahu intended to open the indirect talks with the Palestinian Authority with a discussion of the security arrangements in the West Bank and of water resources.
The official added that Netanyahu had recently asked the defense establishment and the National Security Council to elaborate on the so-called eight-points brief, which lists Israel's security demands in terms of a permanent status agreement.
Also Monday, Channel 10 reported that Industry, Trade and Labor Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, who had accompanied Netanyahu on his Sharm el-Sheikh visit, said Egypt was committed to the peace process and doing everything it can to aid in restarting it.
Despite the preparations, some Israeli officials have voiced doubt about any breakthrough without direct negotiations.
Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor described indirect talks as "a strange affair" after face-to-face peace negotiations stretching back 16 years.

There have been no direct talks for the past 18 months, a period that has included Israel's Gaza war, election of a right-wing Israeli government and entrenched rule in the Gaza Strip by Hamas Islamists opposed to the U.S. peace efforts.

"I think it is clear to everyone that real talks are direct talks, and I don't think there is a chance of a significant breakthrough until the direct talks begin," Meridor said.

"The talks will be held. The envoy, Mitchell, will talk to us, to them. But the more we hasten to arrive at direct talks, the more we will be able to address the heart of the matter."

Nabil Abu Rdainah, a spokesman for Abbas, said the negotiations would show whether the Israeli government was serious about peace and "test the sincerity" of the Obama administration in pursuing Palestinian statehood.

"The truth is we are not in need of negotiations. We are in need of decisions by the Israeli government. This is the time for decisions more than it is the time for negotiations," Abu Rdainah said.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
    This story is by: Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent and News Agencies
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 26. 7 1
    #14 Rabbi Yitzchok Wolf
    • Ron of Fairfax
    • 11.05.10
    • 21:01

    You are not well-informed, but fully prepared to imply you know what you are talking about in order to deceive readers. Abbas is not fully in line with Syria or Lebanon and the claim is absurd. Abbas is fully aligned with the Arab League, and under tremendous pressure and influence by the US to enter into peace talks. Obama has risen to the challenge of Israel’s violation of international laws, more violations of UN resolutions than any country in the world, and in violation of five articles of the 4th Geneva Convention. Each violation of the Convention can be considered a war crime before the International Criminal Court in the Hague. His administration is finally responding to a long smoldering, but rapidly spreading view of senior US military officers, and leaders in the intelligence community, that is is time to reevaluate the US-Israeli relationship, because the relationship is creating strong anti-American animus in the Arab world, that does not serve US national security interests. Regardless of what Abbas asks for, Israel must concede occupied territories to permit the formation of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state. The US needs no Israeli support for the 6th fleet, and our concerns do not center on the eastern Mediterranean. Our military concerns lie in the Persian gulf, and we receive superb intelligence and military support from the UAE. Israel offers nothing there. Your comments about Israeli intelligence must come from your imagination. Most intelligence professionals consider Mossad, small, under-financed (compared to major power services) and second rate. After Iraq invasion, US Senate Intel committee, and the Knesset, stated most of the intel Mossad had passed to US was false. CIA statement was “Israeli intel assistance is sometimes of dubious value...and appalled at lack of quality... Mossad doesn’t know its Arab enemies, Arab political intel is lousy, laughably bad...it was gossip stuff mostly. They often pass faulty, misleading intel.” So Rabbi, leave us be.

  • 25. 0 1
    Peace in the Middle East
    • 05.05.10
    • 19:39

    This whole article is about the U.S., Israel & PA talking about talking about talking about peace. I did not write that wrong. Cut the double talk and just get to the talks. But for peace's sake, do not give up any Israeli land for peace. Bartering a tangible for an intangible is always foolish for the side that is actually giving something up!

  • 24. 8 3
    #11 Raul- Palestinian concessions
    • Ron of Fairfax
    • 05.05.10
    • 01:09

    Historically the occupying power makes the concessions: not the oppressed people. Israel is no different than any other occupying power in history. The same as the French in Algeria and Vietnam, the British in Kenya and Cyprus, and the Germans in occupied Europe. So the world wonders what the Palestinians have to offer to Israel as concessions. Could they match the concessions Israel has proffered toward the peace process? The 90 day freeze on settlement building, while continuing to build 3,000 housing units in the West Bank, and to place Jerusalem off limits for any building limits? Continuing the harsh and humiliating occupation in the West Bank? Maintain the near genocidal blockade over Gaza and continue the annexation of Jerusalem: both in violation of the 4th Geneva Convention? Or perhaps the construction of the barrier wall, which the UN ICJ has declared illegal?

  • 23. 0 0
    sounds like they had an interesting "conversation"...
    • Erastus CoupeDeVille
    • 04.05.10
    • 12:56

    Obama to Bibi... make "full use of substantive proximity talks" or there will be a publicly posted, rock bottom price tag that no US based foreign interest lobby group can ever hope to pay.

  • 22. 3 0
    There's been no news on plans how to deal with Hamas and Gaza
    • A Bethlehemite
    • 04.05.10
    • 12:18

    All the recent news and peace initiatives do make me feel hopeful that there may be a chance for a peaceful resolution until I start thinking how will the PA, Israel and US solve the problem with Hamas if they are against this peace initiative. I am curious to know what the US and the PA have in mind; There has been no politician discussing this issue or at least a solution to Hamas’s involvement with this new peace initiative.

  • 21. 2 1
    The statement by Abu Rdainah is more profound than anything else said
    • WeCan2
    • 04.05.10
    • 09:37

    "The truth is we are not in need of negotiations. We are in need of decisions by the Israeli government". There is no other way of putting it so concisely.

  • 20. 5 1
    The statement by Abu Rdainah is more profound than anything else said
    • WeCan2
    • 04.05.10
    • 04:29

    "The truth is we are not in need of negotiations. We are in need of decisions by the Israeli government". There is no other way of putting it so concisely.

  • 19. 7 0
    Not just good neighbours Tony...
    • Damian Lataan
    • 04.05.10
    • 02:26

    but as cohabitants in a shared land with equal rights for all. A tough ask now, but, in the end, it is the only solution.

  • 18. 3 0
    Not just good neighbours Tony...
    • Damian Lataan
    • 04.05.10
    • 02:26

    but as cohabitants in a shared land with equal rights for all. A tough ask now, but, in the end, it is the only solution.

  • 17. 12 3
    A Real Peace Plan
    • Alan Leventhal
    • 04.05.10
    • 00:16

    One hopes and prays that a breakthrough will occur. However, as an American Jew, I see that Israel's right-wingers are similar to the self-destructive, irrational right-wingers in my country who will do whatever they can to prevent progress. I really see that all this struggle and torment will come to naught unless there is a dramatic turnaround from the Israeli public. One idea that keeps popping up and I'm sure will come up again is the creation of an Palestinian/Israeli state with guarantees for everyone. In other words, rapprochement between Israel and the Arab world. Just imagine the benefits in terms of business, education and culture! We Jews are suppose to be peacemakers and now is the time for positive action.

  • 16. 8 0
    On the horizon a new way.
    • Jellico
    • 03.05.10
    • 23:12

    Hopefully there is a lot going on behind the scene than is reported in any media. It will be a cruel joke to have the hopes of so many pinned to empty words. Let’s hope for the sake of the Israelis, Palestinians and the region that the words are bountiful. It can be called anything, The Road map, Oslo, Camp David, UN242 or The Peoples Peace Proposal just as long as there is a plan. Enough war already!

  • 15. 5 1
    Indirect Talks
    • Bandar Michaels
    • 03.05.10
    • 22:42

    Yes, Israel holds all the cards except one, and it is time for making decisions. Negotiations have lasted for sixteen years without significant results . The most important decision Israel has to make is wether it will allow the conception of a Palestinian State with East jerusalem as its capital or eventually the conception of a binational state.

  • 14. 3 7
    Indirect Negotiations 17 Years Backwards
    • Rabbi Yitzchok Wolf
    • 03.05.10
    • 22:40

    While all parties are trying to sound upbeat about these indirect negotiations it really puts us back 17 years - pre Oslo. Abbas is now fully in line with Syria, Lebanon and other enemy countries who use a third party to talk to us. Thanks to President Obama who emboldened Mr. Abbas to be even more stubborn than Arafat, the future of these talk are all but settled. Abbas will ask for everything that Israel cannot give him and will fault Israel. The administration will then too fault Israel and condemn it. Israel will then be blamed for all troubles in the Middle East including the failed Times Square bombing. Finally Israel will see where this administratyion is heading and challenge the US with expelling the 6th fleet from its shores, remove all US military installations in Israel and stop providing the US with the best Middle East intelligence that the US can get. Perhaps, yes perhaps Congress and the Senate will then put a stop to the Admonistration's reckless new Middle East policies.

  • 13. 8 1
    Peace Talks
    • Erwin Rosen
    • 03.05.10
    • 22:08

    Wishful thinking. With the current coalition there is no chance. Kadima must be involved.

  • 12. 3 8
    the problems are the Arab leaders who
    • See roots of problems
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:48

    forbid Jordan to take responsibility to retake all Jordanians "so called-Palestinians" leaving in Israel back to Jordoan they country. Egypt should also be responsible and held accountable by the UN or superpowers when it sends arms through tunnels to Gaza.

  • 11. 3 8
    What consesions will the arabs make?
    • Raul
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:41

    Israel gave so much back and paid the price. What will the arabs give in return? so far NOTHING!

  • 10. 3 0
    #4 Tony Silver
    • Sam
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:38

    Amen.Now is the time to make peace in the broader ME..

  • 9. 6 3
    we all know
    • a moderate palestinian
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:17

    we all know that these negotiations , have no good intention from the israeli side ,

  • 8. 0 7
    The talks and further..What?.
    • Jasmine
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:15

    The special U.S. Middle East peace envoy, George Mitchell, arrived in Tel Aviv just hours before the telephone conversation to deliberate with leaders in the region and prepare for the upcoming talks. More prodding and pushing by Obama et al that never stops. And it will not be achieved by force assuredly.And Obama's peace efforts received a boost on Saturday when Arab states approved four months of "proximity talks", which were expected to begin in March but suffered a delay due to Israel's announcement of a settlement project in East Jerusalem. Oh yes they would, woulnt’t they just? A typical derisory comment that is unacceptable to Israel.

  • 7. 3 1
    these negotiations are a waste of time ,and a bluf
    • a moderate palestinian
    • 03.05.10
    • 21:14

  • 6. 0 3
    looks like this puppet is bringing conspiracy and secret info
    • jew
    • 03.05.10
    • 20:58

    every week instead of peace initiatives.

  • 5. 23 3
    How to break the Gordian knot
    • Bazmann
    • 03.05.10
    • 20:48

    Both Netanyahu and Abbas know exactly what the framework of a peace agreement will look like. Abbas gave it his blessing already, Netanyahu will have to make a decision, his right wing coalition will not allow him to make the necessary concessions and will bolt out of the government causing its collapse, the decision he makes will be indicative of how serious he is about reaching a peace agreement. If he elects to have Kadima and Labor join his coalition then there is a glimmer of hope for peace, if he opts to declare new elections, the new government whether it is intransigent right wing or weak center (Kadima and Labor) will not be able to make peace, in this case an imposed solution based on UN resolution 242 and 338 will have to be the solution that brakes this Gordian knot.

  • 4. 46 0
    It is time for peace.
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 03.05.10
    • 18:21

    Palestinians and israeli need to live in peace as good neighbours.

    • 1 0
      It is time for Peace.
      • One smart cookie
      • 04.05.10
      • 19:36

      I would suggest that Iran change its stance on wiping Israel off the face of the Earth before anything happens. We all want Peace but we have learned from Hitler and the holocaust that Iran says never happened. Perhaps if they could agree that would be a good start but why would sane people believe a man that talks out of both sides of his mouth and can't be trusted by his own people.

  • 3. 11 20
    Smoke Screen ???
    • Brad Alen
    • 03.05.10
    • 17:34

    Last time an Israeli PM talked to mubarak, we had Gaza. As Netanyahou is not known for hi diplomacy towards the arabs, i suspect this is nothing but a smoke screen to inform Egypt of Israel's intent to go after Hizballah and likely Syria. Part of the new mid-east diplomacy.

  • 2. 8 36
    Strong men
    • Brent
    • 03.05.10
    • 16:43

    Bibi looks so happy to talk with the dictator

  • 1. 31 5
    Mubarak/Netanyahu
    • Tne Teacher/Instruct
    • 03.05.10
    • 16:14

    So much has passed between our two countries,& even though a formal peace treaty was signed. Much love hasn't been lost . One can hope for better days.