Obama mulls declaring the 'red lines' that would trigger U.S. attack on Iran

I think it is possible Iran already has a nuclear weapon?? There are a couple missing from Russia

the irrational iranian regime is putting the world peace in danger and must be dealt with decisively and quickly

He promised to close Guantanamo 4 years ago, but GITMO is still thriving and its illegally captured inmates are still being tortured by American soldiers and CIA operatives.

America would not allow Iran to get away with a nuclear attack on Israel. Anything short of this however is OK for Iran just as it has been for Israel all these decades. It is self defeating as well as provocotive to treat Iran any differently than Israel. Consider: Over the past six years, Israel has used cluster bombs on civilians. Iran has not. Israel has used white phosphorus weapons in civilians, Iran has not. Israel has planted extensive numbers of land mines in neighboring nations, Iran has not. Israel has targetted and killed UN observers, Iran has not. Israel has conducted assassinations in foreign nations, Iran has not. Israel has killed thousands of civilians since 2006, Iran has not. Israel has been allowed to hold a large undeclared nuclear arsenal for decades, Iran has not. It is not Iran that needs red lines. It is Israel.

Who wouldn't want the US to fight wars for them? Don't fall for Net's baloney Mr. Obama.

Where is the red line for Iran? When should Iran launch a pre-emptive strike on israels nuks?

Is this just a ploy to place a curtain of America military hardware in region.

Iran and the Iranians know it as do most people with a brain.

NOW WE ARE MORE SURE BO AIN'T GOING: with 9 weeks to go for US 2012 Elections: 51% would've voted Democrat IF held today. Thus BO stays is more likely than BO goes as 51% will Vote BO and DEMS: BO is the guy the majority in US still like more and as MR they like less .

Now BO again is slightly ahead of MR: so, now it is most LIKELY BO a Winner: 270 is minimally required; MR 268 and the difference still tight. Another perhaps more important thing is that in US BO still Favored by 47% for BO and 40% MR: with a mere 40% favoratism MR ain't a WIN .

just recycled propaganda.

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibts such an explicit threat of force. This President will know better than to do that.

... shed as it goes about trying to realize its earthly dream of establishing regional hegemony and beyond by hook or by crook, but mostly by crook. As is always the case with these cowardly regimes, the blood shed will not be from the pompous rulers and their families but from that of its common, captive people ridden like beasts of burden to achieve excessively proud national and international agendas. America's red line should not be drawn only after Iran outfits its new Venezuelan missile base being built with nuclear-tipped missiles.

He will not allow Israel to drag USA into a new war of chaos and uncertainity. Israel under Netanyahu does not deserve anything from USA. Netanyahu is on his own. Obama administration will not be responsible for decisions made by some mad, unruly, and belligernt politicians. Never again.

The red line is when Iran violates international law. Then Israel files the complaint with the ICC and goes to the hearing with the appropriate and sufficient evidence. Iran has to sign additional safeguard addenda noting that it will cooperate with ICC proceedings upon issuance of a valid and verifiable complaint as allowed by international law to Israel. Another red line regarding Iran is that if Israel strikes without our consent, there will be consequences and we bear zero complicity.

Red lines like if Ahmednijad & Khameni display an A-Bomb with a "Made in Iran" label in Tehran's bazaar or conduct a nuclear test on Tel-Aviv ? Ludicrous, "sanctions & red-lines" have been impose don Iran since 1979 and crossed each time with impunity by the Iranians. More Obama hot-air to fool Israel