• Published 03:07 22.05.10
  • Latest update 16:00 22.05.10

Lebanon PM: International community must take responsibility for Middle East peace

Ahead of Washington trip, Said Hariri urges world powers to make 'serious effort' to push forward Israel-Palestinian talks - but Obama administration is more likely to focus on flow of arms to Hezbollah.

By News Agencies Tags: Israel news Barack Obama Lebanon Hezbollah Said Hariri

 

Lebanese Prime Minister Said Hariri in Bulgaria, March 29, 2010

Lebanese Prime Minister Said Hariri in Bulgaria, March 29, 2010

Photo by: Reuters

Ahead of a trip to Washington, Lebanese Prime Minister Said Hariri called on the international community to step up pressure on Israel and the Palestinians to strike a peace deal.

Hariri met with Egyptian President Hosny Mubarak Saturday in Cairo to discuss the Middle East peace process and regional developments.

The two leaders talked about ways to revive the indirect peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel as well as developments inside Lebanon.

After the meeting, Hariri said that it was time for the "international community to take responsibility" and exert "serious efforts" to push the peace process forward, Lebanese TV channel al-Mustaqbal reported.

"The only end for this process is peace," Hairi said, adding that he would convey this message to U.S. President Barack Obama, al-Mustaqbal added.

Hariri arrived earlier for his short visit which is part of an Arab tour ahead of his visit to the United States, which included Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. 

He is scheduled to meet Obama on Monday amid fears of renewed fighting between Lebanon and Israel.

Later on Saturday, he is due to head for Istanbul to meet Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

Obama is likely to raise concerns about Syria arming Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon when he meetsHariri on Monday, a U.S. official said on Friday.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the two leaders would discuss a "broad range of mutual goals in support of Lebanon's sovereignty and independence, regional peace and security".

Hariri's first official visit to the United States takes place against a backdrop of tensions in the Middle East, U.S. efforts to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and growing momentum toward new international sanctions on Iran.

Analysts expect Obama to be more encouraging in tone than demanding of results when he meets Hariri, who heads a national unity government that includes Hezbollah - a Shi'ite Islamist guerrilla group which is backed by Syria and Iran and is listed as a terrorist organization by the United States.

Lebanon and Syria have said they fear a possible attack by Israel after President Shimon Peres accused Syria in April of supplying Hezbollah with long-range Scud missiles capable of hitting Israel. Damascus has denied the charge and accused Israel of fomenting war.

Some U.S. officials have expressed doubt that any Scuds were actually handed over in full to Hezbollah, although they believe Syria might have transferred weapons parts.

"We obviously have grave concerns about the transfer of any missile capability to Hezbollah through Lebanon from Syria," a senior Obama administration official told Reuters, saying the issue would likely be raised in Monday's talks.

Another official said Washington would ask Hariri to continue to support efforts "toward comprehensive regional peace."

Hariri has also denied Israel's accusations, while his government has said it backs the right of the guerrilla group to keep its weapons to deter Israeli attacks. Israel, which fought a 34-day war with Hezbollah in 2006, has not signaled any imminent plans to strike.

The war of words heightened tensions in the region, but the UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Michael Williams, noted on Friday "that recent tension is now diminishing."

Williams, who held talks with Hariri in Beirut, was quoted by the prime minister's office as saying he was pleased "that all sides have scaled back the rhetoric."

Obama and Hariri are also expected to discuss U.S.-led international efforts to isolate Iran over its disputed nuclear program, officials said. Lebanon holds the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council through May 31.

Diplomats said Beirut had quietly asked the permanent members of the Security Council - Britain, France, Russia, China and the United States - not to push for a vote on a new Iran sanctions resolution while it held the presidency.

Lebanon is expected to abstain in any vote because Iranian-backed Hezbollah is in its government, diplomats said.

Jon Alterman, a Middle East expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Lebanon no longer enjoyed the status it had under the Bush administration, when it was the "fulcrum" of efforts to spread democracy in the Middle East.

The Obama administration's Middle East policy is more focused on the nuclear stand-off with Iran, war in Afghanistan, and reviving the Middle East peace process, he said.

Nevertheless, the United States has expanded military assistance to Lebanon to strengthen its armed forces as a counterweight to Hezbollah, allocating $500 million to training and equipping Lebanese security forces since 2005.
 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 30. 19 11
    Hezbullsh is part of the problem and not the solution.
    • a wandering Jew
    • 22.05.10
    • 20:26

    It is important to curtail Hezbollah's power and ambitions. They can not co-exist with a democracy which they can not intimidate.

  • 29. 13 10
    International community cannot force Arabs to embrace peace.
    • Meo
    • 22.05.10
    • 20:11

    Threats of annihilation of Israel combined with peace destabilizing actions from Gaza,West Bank,Syria and Lebanon are clear indicators of what Arabs really want so why is he talking about peace if all we can see is just Arab warmongering and preparations for war against Israel? Thousands of missiles in Lebanon and Syria are ready to hit Israeli cities,verbal attacks and threats against Israel are increasing every day and Hariri wants us to believe that his country is a peace loving one? How peacefull was unprovoked attack from Lebanon that started Israelo Lebanese war in 2006,Mr.Hariri?

  • 28. 12 11
    hariri
    • Shmuelshachor
    • 22.05.10
    • 19:50

    he's a dead man walking as long as the syrians and the hizballah need him.The "ionternational community" is not worth a flip.They allowed the whole problem of the iranians,syrians and hizballah to "grow and multiply".ONLY ISRAEL CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM...BARACK MADE A HUGE MISTAKE SCRAMBLING AWAY FROM LEBANON

  • 27. 6 16
    Lebanese Army is weak to defend itself,that is why Hezbollah assume this job
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 22.05.10
    • 19:46

    Unfortunately, the Lebanese Armed forces are inadequately armed to even fight against al Qaida within its borders

    • 11 6
      Nonsense!
      • a wandering Jew
      • 22.05.10
      • 21:30

      Hezbullah would love to stage a coup to take control of the lebanesse government.. The last time they thought about it, they they were "deterred" by Israel. Have they yet finished puting all the pieces back together again?

  • 26. 6 16
    How US and Israel should deal with Hizballah
    • Logios
    • 22.05.10
    • 19:25

    "But despite strong backing for Hezbollah, Syria remained keen to strike a peace deal with Israel... A political settlement with Israel is high on Syria's list of priorities and intelligence shows a will to reach an agreement – but on their terms, meaning a return of the Golan Heights and American involvement" [Brig. Gen. Baidatz of MI] said." - Haaretz One would think such an analysis, and others over the years, would lead to one simple conclusion: Get Syria out of Iran`s orbit and make peace with it. This will bring an end to military Hizballah and also bring peace with Lebanon. Syria`s close alliance with Iran is not natural. Syria is secular, Iran fundamentalist. Syria is an Arab state, Iran Persian (long time no friends). Syria is mostly Sunni, Iran Shiite. Syria used to be friendly to the US, since they joined the coalition against Saddam in the 1991 war. Jim Baker visited Syria 15 times. After the 9-11 attacks Syria helped the US in hunting al-Qaida, even to the extent of torturing some on behalf of the CIA. But Syria continued to support Hizballah as pressure against Israel. However, Bush had larger (and confused) ambitions, so he made Hizballah one of his targets. Syria, as their supporter, became "evil", and Israel can now use this excuse to refrain from dealing with Syria and maintain its hold over the Golan. There is a price to the Israeli reluctance to talk peace with Syria. Since 1973, when Egypt got out of the Israeli-Arab conflict, Syria tried to cause trouble only indirectly, so as not to be attacked itself. Israel, though had to go to war twice already, in Lebanon, in 1982 and 2006. Another one is expected. All these were indirect Syrian wars. But now, Syria is willing to repeat the Hizballah strategy and engage Israel in its own war, perhaps as part of a larger war led by Iran.

  • 25. 17 25
    One day there was the UN
    • coocoocoocoo
    • 22.05.10
    • 16:46

    The United Nations has been so damaged by the American abuse of the veto in favor of Israel that it has been replaced by the term "International Community"

  • 24. 12 20
    Disarming Hezbollah or arming effectively Lebanon to deter ISraeli flights
    • American
    • 22.05.10
    • 16:25

    It all boils down to Israel abuse it's power over the skies of Lebanon. Hezbollah arms are an equal threat to Israel if she tries to extend it's hegemony over Lebanon.

  • 23. 3 19
    The Obama mistake
    • Logios
    • 22.05.10
    • 16:24

    Of course there is no mistake in trying to solve the Israeli-Palestinian problem. This would take care of a good part of Middle East problems. But the Obama mistake is that he did not start by pushing Israel into peace with Syria, that is, pushing Israel to give up the Golan. Peace with Syria can be settled within half a year since all the issues have been discussed and the solutions are known. Even Netanyahu, during his first PM term, agreed to give back the Golan in return for peace. And the older Assad agreed to peace on this basis. (Barak became fearful, but Clinton did not pressure him.) Likud, and the other Greater Israel idealists, know that the Golan is not part of historical Eretz Israel (where the 12 tribes dwelled), so pressure can persuade them. Peace between Israel and Syria will choke off weapons to Hizballah (and even Hamas), and reduce Iran's standing in the region. It will also weaken the Palestinians, making them more amenable to compromise. After that relatively easy step, the US should have turned to peace with the Palestinians. But Obama was inexperienced, and has a weak Foreign Policy team. Obama also believes in his power of persuasion and may not understand illogical people. But I think he learned much by now, and can still correct his path.

    • 4 0
      Dream on!
      • Ki'emli
      • 22.05.10
      • 21:13

      Israel will not put itself in danger to be shelled by the Syrian forces again, like they were in 67. If that's inconvenient for the Left, tough.

  • 22. 20 53
    Is Hizballah a terrorist organization? Probably not.
    • Logios
    • 22.05.10
    • 16:22

    Hizballah started as a resistance movement against the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982. One of its founders was a master terrorist (Mugnieh) and in the 1980's it committed some terrorist acts such as kidnapping Westerners. This was a long time ago, and the vast majority of countries in the world, including the European Union, do not view Hizballah as terrorist. The confused Bush Administration put Hizballah on the terrorist list, where they are to this day (but shouldn't be). Perhaps putting Iran on the List got Bush to add Hizballah too. It wasn't useful then and it isn't now. I don't believe that the approach Obama is taking will be useful, Hizballah is not going to divorce itself from Iran its co-religionist and supporter. Better to deal with Syria and this way put an end to weapons supply to Hizballah so that they become a fully political party in Lebanon.

    • 5 13
      terrorism
      • joaquim levi
      • 22.05.10
      • 17:58

      And Israel invaded Lebanon (a country that declared war on Israel) in 1982 to stop rockets from being fired at its civilians near the border. How would you call Hezbollah's bombing of the Israeli embassy and Amia (civilian building) in Buenos Aires?

    • 14 4
      "Is Hezbollah a Terrorist organization"
      • H
      • 22.05.10
      • 18:47

      Of course not, and neither is my army here in the UK, armed to the teeth with guns and rockets and non elected by the people. I'd be interested to know why the UK Government allows me to exist? Maybe you know Professor?? BTW any news on the Lockerbie bomber's health or Mr Kuntar the child killer??

    • 3 15
      Wake up to the news, Mr. H
      • Logios
      • 22.05.10
      • 19:32

      "BTW any news on the Lockerbie bomber's health or Mr Kuntar the child killer??" - H You should start reading the daily news or at least watch them on tv instead of making them up. Have some coffee to make sure you are awake, and be attentive. Had you done this in the past you would have known that the Lockerbie bomber was Lybian, and Mr Kuntar was not on a Hizballah mission, although Hizballah got him released with all Lebanese prisoners Israel held. And if you are still awake, why don't you check your Oxford dictionary for the definition of "terrorist". You may discover that being armed and not elected by the people is not a sufficient condition. To Mr. Joaquim Levi I would say that it is time to put those responsible for the Buenos Aires bombings on trial. I Believe the latest accusation was against Iranians. But why not start by lobbying the Argentine government to put Hizballah on the terrorist list? See what they tell you.

    • 8 1
      Why don't you read Hizbollah's charter?
      • Ki'emli
      • 22.05.10
      • 21:14

      Their whole existence is based on the elimination of Israel. Get a clue. Of course, with the Left it doesn't count as terrorism if Jews die.

  • 21. 21 5
    Beginning in 1930's the Palestinian position has been
    • Kinko
    • 22.05.10
    • 16:10

    We don't want you here (that's understandable) and we reserve the right, at any time, to try and send you packing, and to kick you out of your homes, should we be able to prevail. However, if we don't prevail you must not hold that against us and must treat us with the utmost kindness and we must never suffer any harmful effects. The Palestinians have come a long way from that position. It is still Hezbollah's position

  • 20. 9 14
    PM Said Hariri
    • Sonny USA
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:29

    The typical response by the Arabs is to call on the international community to resolve the problems plaguing the ME. The Moslem nations have failed to take on the burdensome responsibility of solving their own problems. The attitude of most Arab countries involved with the Arab/Israel conflict is let the world solve it; they created Israel now let them take on all the burdens of maintaining the peace. While all the proxy terrorist groups created by the Arabs keep the pressure on. But America’s not at war with terrorists but extremists Islamic elements that no one seems to know where they are and who supports them. I guess we are that stupid if we can’t figure out that Mosques collect all the money and send it to the terrorists to fight the Infidels and convert the whole world to Islam. Lebanon is nothing but a giant rat’s nest of terrorists and we just let it pass?

  • 19. 0 0
    The reality of Waltz with Bashir
    • ft
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:25

    The Lebanon is special. Read Kewenig

  • 18. 9 8
    Better idea - turn Lebanon into a peaceful nation
    • TT
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:20

    All Israeli military operations against Lebanon were initiated as a result of aggression comming from the Lebanese side of the border. This was true in 1978 and 1981 (Fatah launching rockets and incursions) and it was true in 2006. The Lebanese would like to continue to wage war against Israel, egged on by the Iranians, but they want to dictact the terms of how Israel responds to that aggression. Lebanon has no legitimate Casus Belli against Israel (The sheba farms is a red herring, as the UN certified that Israel had withdrawn to the international border). We witnessed during the Lebanese civil war the savagry the Lebanese are capabole of; we continue to witness their aggression.

  • 17. 7 5
    Hariri visit as a positive development
    • allang
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:17

    I don’t know about anybody else, but I view the Hariri visit as a positive development. This kind of face-to-face assessment can bring good results for both Washington and Beirut. Hariri is not a radical and Obama understands the need for strategic coalition. In the Bush - Cheney era... this kind of situation wouldn’t be possible. For a Lebanese head of state, Hezbollah’s weapon acquisition is a politically delicate subject. So is Israeli military intentions or Lebanese sovereignty. All those issues can be handled behind closed doors. This is the middle east after all... and fostering meaningful relationships take much longer then usual.

  • 16. 30 17
    This terrorist puppet of Hizb'allah makes 'demands'
    • Petra
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:16

    of the world to try once more for a' final solution'? How about instead, he begin by making Lebanon Hizb'allah terrorist free, rather than that of being an 'official' mouthpiece for the occupying force of militants and allow the Lebanese people to live free from foreign occupation and the assassination of a beloved Lebanese leader? These leaches get a foot in the door and demand the house or, your life.

  • 15. 2 6
    $500 Millions Worth of Hummers!
    • $500 Millions
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:10

    What is needed is to Deter Israel, Not Fellow Lebanese! Tell it the Way it is Hariri!

  • 14. 19 10
    Congratulations to the Lebanese: Your No Longer Enjoy Bush's "fulcrum" of efforts to spread democracy in the Middle East.
    • Monitor
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:08

    That Effort was to Force you to Democratically Accept Invasions, Occupation, and Live without Sovereignty.

  • 13. 13 1
    Very Easy! Hariri Takes Responsibility for Disarming Hizbollah, Against Supplying the Lebanese Army with the Weapns Israel Gets For Free!
    • Monitor
    • 22.05.10
    • 15:01

    Once the Lebanese Army is a Lethal Match to Israel, Hizbolllah is no longer needed. Hariri will be able to Warn Back Israel that it will be held Responsible and Will Suffer the Consequences of Any Aggression. Short of This, Hisbollah is needed to Deter Israel from Adding to Its Very Long Wish to Wage War on the Lebanese.

  • 12. 34 41
    Giving 500 million to Lebanon makes no sense
    • Natallie Durson
    • 22.05.10
    • 14:57

    Far better to cut all aid to Israel. This would send a message to Israel that they cannot continue to get away with murder. Giving billions to Israel every year, and half a billion to Lebanon over 5 years is a joke.

  • 11. 53 21
    International community must take responsibility for Middle East peace
    • Dani
    • 22.05.10
    • 12:45

    Disarming Hezbollah as per resolution 1701

    • 14 39
      Read The English (official) Version
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 22.05.10
      • 14:38

      The official versions don't provide what the translation you seem to have read. Try the original in English or French. Your version is erroneous. The original also doesn't provide for the overflights by the IAF.

    • 31 3
      Mark you peasant
      • Derry
      • 22.05.10
      • 18:39

      Actually, if you, Mark, read 1701 you will see a recurring theme calling for the only armed forces to belong to the government of Lebanon. At the time of 1701 this was acceptable. Today, the Hezbolla armed forces comprise a distinctive element of the official armed forces of the government since Hezbolla itself is part of the government - since Lebanese elections of ~June 2009, Hezbolla has 10 of the 30 cabinet positions.

  • 10. 34 26
    Iran's terror proxy
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 22.05.10
    • 12:31

    iran's terror proxy, hezbollah, poses a direct threat to the lebanese as well as to the state of israel. as defence secretary gates had stated recently, hezbollah has more arms and missiles than most governments. hezbollah's weapon systems are clearly offencive in nature. although hezbollah has members within lebanon's government, hezbollah's military is under the exclusive control of the terror group. the refusal of hezbollah to disarm, is in direct violation of international mandates. hezbollah's missiles, many of which are sophisticated, can reach all areas in israel where they can cause substantial casualties and physical dammage . such an accummulation of missiles have a clearly offencive nature. should hezbollah attack in any way israel, she will be obliged to respond with overwhelming force. such response, given hezbollah's integration into the lebanese government, and given pm hariri's asssertion that hezbollah has the right to keep its weapons, and given hezbollah's very serious missile threat against israel, would result in an all-out war against lebanon. hence, iran's terror proxy poses a direct threat to both lebanon and to israel. this threat cannot be neutralised by the laf given the government's clear declaration that hezbollah has the right to keep its arms. thus, any attempt to arm the laf is tantamount to arming hezbollah, an iranian terror proxy, and thereby further endangering the state of israel.

    • 6 18
      Translation
      • Albert
      • 22.05.10
      • 16:47

      USA's terror proxy, Israel, poses a direct threat to the lebanese as well as other ME states. as defence secretary gates had stated recently, weapon systems are clearly offencive in nature violation of international mandates... and so on

    • 14 2
      Check you history Albert.
      • Ki'emli
      • 22.05.10
      • 21:20

      Maybe if the Arabs would refrain from attacking and accepting Israel's existence we wouldn't have that problem. Of course, the Left wants the conflict so that it can continue to whine about Israel.

  • 9. 44 59
    Hariri to Obama - Reality's a Bitch
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 22.05.10
    • 10:39

    Hariri will probably tell Obama that the arms that Hezbollah are the only thing stopping the IDF from re-occupying all of Lebanon south of the Litani. Unfortunately, the Lebanese Armed forces are inadequately armed to even fight against al Qaida within its borders. And repelling an invader from the North or the South or the East is out of the question. Korean War vintage weapons that are half rusted away won't cut it. If the US or Israel want the Lebanese Armed Forces to take over from Hezbollah, Lebanon has to be allowed to officially defend itself. Relying on Israeli largess and benignity it a joke.

    • 24 19
      Reality
      • jake
      • 22.05.10
      • 13:44

      Sensible argument. To bring the Lebanese military up to scratch maybe half of what Israel gets annually from the Americans should be diverted to its northern neighbor. In no time I'll wager no more need for Hezbollah! May stir up the pot a bit but oh the richness of the irony.

    • 19 9
      You have missed the point. Again
      • Knight
      • 22.05.10
      • 18:42

      Pathetic comment. Firstly, observe the $500 million the Lebanese government has received for defense expenditure so far. Secondly, the only thing encouraging Israel's invasion of Lebanon is Hezbolla - get rid of them and then you can have a peaceful Lebanon/Israel border.

    • 10 3
      The collective memoray of the Left.
      • Ki'emli
      • 22.05.10
      • 21:23

      Is obviously very short. Prior to the 2006 war, there was talk in Lebanon about disarming Hizbollah because there had been 25 years of mostly quiet along the border, except for some Hizbollah attacks, and then we have the war. Hizbollah won't accept being disarmed under any circumstances. It must be destroyed.

  • 8. 31 44
    US stands by while Islamic terrorist arm
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 22.05.10
    • 07:52

    Israel is alone as usual.

  • 7. 52 30
    Giving military aid to Lebanon makes no sense
    • hmp49
    • 22.05.10
    • 07:31

    "Nevertheless, the United States has expanded military assistance to Lebanon to strengthen its armed forces as a counterweight to Hezbollah, allocating $500 million to training and equipping Lebanese security forces since 2005." Why not just skip the middleman and give it directly to Hezbollah? This is nuts.

  • 6. 39 40
    mr obama what about lebanon's security
    • abdalla
    • 22.05.10
    • 07:24

    do you think that israel is not a threat to lebanon or syria would they be wrong to pre-empt the pre-emtive strike from israel. would they be terrorists if they attacked israel if they knew israel was planning a attack.

  • 5. 31 21
    What price will Obama try to extract from Israel for uttering these words...??
    • Jehudah Ben-Israel, Qatzrin, Israel
    • 22.05.10
    • 07:11

    So far we have only experienced hostility towards the nation-state of the Jewish people, derived as all the sings indicate, from the guidance of Rev. Wright's Church.

  • 4. 35 22
    Hariri kissed the man that murdered his father...
    • Noah
    • 22.05.10
    • 04:29

    and not on his lips.

  • 3. 24 14
    The Flamboyant Hezbollah Feather In Lebanon's Proud White Cap Will Actually Soil It Greatly By Hemmoraging Blood-Red Ink
    • Lavi - Seattle
    • 22.05.10
    • 04:18

    No Hezbollah provocation along Israel's borders and from within Lebanon proper and Lebanese soldiers need not fear patrolling their territory with just sandals on and armed with no more than pocket combs. However, play the Hezbollah pawn aggressively hard on this middle-eastern chess board and chance the Beirut Castle being rammed into checkmate, not withstanding the moat of Lebanese officials' tears to ward off the IDF.

    • 4 12
      strange enough
      • Oriv
      • 22.05.10
      • 07:07

      That crying game, I believe was not taken as a sign of weakness among some of the arabs I have spoken to during my travels. But taken as a sign of a leader crying out for his nation. While Siniora is a weakling, he was strong enough to do whatever he could to try and save his people. Normally arab leaders are weaklings who cant even come close to do what is best for their people, Siniora made a laughing stock of himself to help his.

  • 2. 157 168
    but we have no concerns arming israel
    • VIPER
    • 22.05.10
    • 03:55

    seriously, obama and his cohorts must think the whole world is stupid and blind to the hypocricy, my head hurts from shaking it in disbelief.

    • 119 113
      Your head hurts because
      • sabra
      • 22.05.10
      • 04:32

      You are looking for a moral equivalency which cannot and will not exist. ISrael does not harbour and arm terror groups, Israel doe snot suicide bomb lebanon etc etc. get your head out of the sand Action reactuion cause and effect. Hizbullah arms itself, so will ISrael. Hizbullah starts another war, Israel will not stop until they will be all put in the ground.

    • 70 50
      Let me get this right
      • Neil
      • 22.05.10
      • 05:15

      The settlers who attack anyone they can get near, burn down olive groves, attack Palestinian kids on the way to school, throw faeces down on Palestinian houses. Israeli Airforce dropping one tone bombs in Gaza residential neighborhoods. These are not terrorist acts? Just the acts of normal Israelis? I know that this is not true. And, so do you. Israel is complicit in terrorist activities towards the Palestinians. Pity you cannot see that and work towards a fair peace.

    • 15 26
      Peace is what everyone wants...
      • gladiator
      • 22.05.10
      • 07:10

      Wherever you live, you are lucky your country isn't faced with the issues Israel has to deal with as a free, independent, democratic Jewish state behind safe and secure borders...in the ME. Neil, this is Middle East...the game played here is very different than in the US, Canada, EU, AU, etc...different values...sad to say. And if you don't play by the rules then you are fuc..d if you stay alive. The Separation Wall that Israel built IS WORKING! this is why you don't hear about the palestinian suicide bombers. And believe me the pal terror groups, Hammas and others, have the desire. Except they got blasted so hard during last was, the Cast Iron, that now they won't let even the rocks to be thrown over the border! The one tone bomb dropped in Gaza a few years back was intended to kill the head of Hammas' military wing and his top commanders, as for the rest of the people living in the building? Let me ask you a question? Would you have lived in the building that housed the head of Hammas's military wing, the arch-killer who escaped the assasins from Israel AND Fatah and other arab security services? Answer it, would you have lived next to him? So who do think lived next to him then? Neil, i think you sound like an intelligent guy who has no clue what is going in the ME and and the rules of the engagement here... Stay where you are, keep fantasizing about the life full of peace loving people and the world full of love, flowers and rainbows...

    • 43 56
      No, they only use white phosphorous, cluster bombs, bomb buses
      • Uncommon American
      • 22.05.10
      • 07:28

      Israel doesn't harbour terrorist groups? What about the settlers? Are they not terrorists? And you're right. Israel doesn't use suicide bombs. They only use cluster bombs in villages, white phosphorus against civilians, bomb civilian infrastructure, etc. Israel is by no means a stranger when it comes to crimes against Humanity.

    • 28 31
      Tut-tut
      • jake
      • 22.05.10
      • 15:07

      Please. The use of white phosphorus and cluster bombs on civilians is for self-defense purposes only. If the international community can understand this why can't you?

    • 14 2
    • 10 27
    • 20 14
      But from an "American"?...
      • joaquim levi
      • 22.05.10
      • 18:06

      The settlers are not terrorists, they don't blow civilian buses, clubs, schools, etc. They don't blow themselves. Cluster bombs: Not illegal, the US and many other western nations uses them. White phosphorus: The same. It is used ot illuminate targets, not to burn civilians (though accidents may occur, of course). Bomb civilian infrastructure: Like the Beirut airport? To prevent more Iranian weapons and terrorists from arriving. All these criticisim, coming from an American... Are you serious?

  • 1. 108 130
    Self-defeating policies
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 22.05.10
    • 03:42

    The USA has, at Israel's demand, kept the armed forces of Lebanon ill-equipped and hopelessly inferior. Thus Lebanon's only defense against Israel is the force which expelled Israel from much of Lebanon - Hizbollah. Israel still occupies parts of Lebanon and threatens Lebanon with attack upon an almost daily basis. The First Lebanon War - the war started by Ariel Sharon to 'remake the political map of the mideast' led to the creation of Hizbollah. That the Lebanese Army could not expel Israel from most of Southern Lebanon while Hisbollah could, made it a credible force in Lebanese Politics. That Israel savaged all of Lebanon while avoiding the casualties that would have come from pursuing the destruction of Hisbollah during the Second Lebanon War made Hizbollah a major player in Lebanese politics and affirmed that it and not the Lebanese Army was the only defense force the nation had. The USA continues to keep the Lebanese Army feeble and thus ensures there is no defense alternative available to Lebanon aside from Hisbollah. Israel created Hisbollah, and Israel and it''s sycophant America, continue to ensure that Hisbollah is not only an important player in Lebanon, but it's only credible defense as well. There is a word for nations which insist upon helping their enemies while crippling those who are potentially friends. That word is 'lunatic'.

    • 35 38
      Amen!!!
      • Bryan
      • 22.05.10
      • 04:27

    • 17 28
      Self-defeating policies
      • Gabriel
      • 22.05.10
      • 05:28

      Mark, Clear, consistent analysis, as usual. There is another explanation, however: politics of terror. Keep Hezbollah so politicians can keep talking about terror and gain a political advantage over the scared people of Isreal. If the Leanese army were strong, Hezbollah could not exist and there that army cannot be labeled as a terrorist organization. t

    • 38 41
      Gabriel
      • Mark Lincoln
      • 22.05.10
      • 06:14

      I would feel better were I in agreement. I am afraid that the politicians of Israel are not aware that they are the reason Hisbollah exists and that their actions ensure Hisbollah prospers. I must agree that Likud for example, uses it's bastard children Hamas and Hisbollah as means of justifying it's existence. I am not, however, convinced that the continued support and justification of Hamas and Hisbollah are in fact the result of intent by the Israeli right so much as the product of the insanity of the Israeli right.

    • 14 25
      Mark
      • Chas.
      • 22.05.10
      • 07:18

      A wonderfully worded reply Mark. You have expressed my sentiments better than I could.

    • 31 28
      Mark Lincoln
      • David from Haifa
      • 22.05.10
      • 07:44

      Expelled us from Syria after we destroyed their infrastructure and kicked the butts of these terrorists. we pulled out and they launched 10,000 plus rockets at our north. if you remove that pointy white hat you like to wear you might and I stress might see the truth. NO worries Haaretz does not like Israelis or our view and will not print this.

    • 39 53
      Mark spot on as usual
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 22.05.10
      • 09:47

      Unfortunately the name calling will start now. Apparently Israel is allowed to have nuclear weapons whilst it's neighbours and any country Israel deigns an enemy must not have anything more powerful than a rubberband in case Israel wants to access their water supply. Or as is more usual in Israel, their politicians want to improve their poll ratings.

    • 36 22
      I must repectfully disagree with your analysis mark lincoln
      • arash
      • 22.05.10
      • 09:54

      first of all hizbollah started as a social movement and local militia to protect lebanese shias from central lebanese government and Israeli agression. by mid 80's iranians realized that not only they can help fellow shias but also they can create a proxy against Israel and that was easy because all hizbollah needed was money and iranians had plenty of that so they started pumping millions of dollars into the movement and also sent hundreds of iranian revolutionary guards for training and organizing them not militarly but also iranians help them build schools , clinics and housing and once the infrastructure was in place they trained and armed the leadership and helped them to intergrate as a legitimate force into lebanese politics. so at this point for america to arm lebanese army is useless because it would be arming hizbollah. so the logical thing for america to do is to drop hizbollah from it's terrorist list and recognize it as part of lebanese society after all hizbollah has elected representatives in lebanese parliament and even lebanese president in his recent trip to syria said that if israel attacks hizbollah it's attacking lebanon and that lebanese will stand by hizbollah, and in conclusion we both know that US is shooting itself in the foot by ignoring hizbollah but again when it come to middle east it does not matter what US wants ,it's what israel wants that matters,

    • 24 5
      This post of yours is quite outrageous ... (the third, last try)
      • S
      • 22.05.10
      • 15:16

      Your whole diatribe is just a long hodgepodge of lies: - "Israel still occupies parts of Lebanon " (how many parts? How many sqkm?). - " (Israel) threatens Lebanon with attack on almost daily basis" (really? dayly? The "threat" is not, maybe, a response to Nasrallah's rantings?) - "the Lebanese Army could not expel Israel from most of Southern Lebanon while Hisbollah could" (the UN did, of course, like always). - "That Israel savaged all of Lebanon ..." (If that was savaged, all of it, what was Grozny?)

    • 1 2
      Shallow, by the book, analysis
      • Nasib
      • 22.05.10
      • 15:31

      Fortifying the army will not change the equation vis a vis Hezbollah and Iran.

    • 4 5
      WOW!!!
      • Elie
      • 22.05.10
      • 16:45

      This is EXACTLY how we see it here in lebanon... i'm just so glad western people are analysing the situation in the same way we do now!!! PROPS to mark lincoln

    • 6 12
      True, but
      • Mark Lincoln
      • 22.05.10
      • 17:38

      "first of all hizbollah started as a social movement and local militia to protect lebanese shias from central lebanese government and Israeli agression." - arash Would Hezbollah come into existence had Israel not invaded Lebanon and overrun those areas where the bulk of Lebanon's Shite population was living? I will stick to my opinion that Israel has contributed mightily to the rise of Hisbollah as a major player in Lebanese society. Both the USA and Israel will have to understand that after the Second Lebanon War Hisbollah will continue to be part of any Lebanese government and that there is nothing either the USA or Israel can do to change that fact.

    • 14 3
      You forgot to mention Yasser Arafat and civil war
      • Arnold
      • 22.05.10
      • 17:58

      Sorrowfully for Lebanon it has been the proverbial "monkey in the middle" way too long. The surrounding countries continue to play war games on Lebanese territory. When Ariel Sharon entered S. Lebanon it was due to the ongoing civil war crisis fomented by Yassar Arafat . A crisis threatening the security of Israel. The trouble with these kind of decisions is HOW TO LEAVE. Stupidly the IDF got stuck and made matters worse. A lesson learned. As a result Hezbollah was born and continues to thrive being aided by Syria and Iran. No problem there as the USA has always aided Israel. Tit for Tat is a universal phenomonon. But whereas the Irgun and Haganah were enmeshed into the IDF and political fabric of Israeli society , Hezbollah militarily refuses to become one with the Lebanese national army. As well according to military news out of Israel , Hezbollah is going to put of a defence wall parallel to the Lebanese / Syrian border which will also separate the S. Lebanese enclave from the rest of Lebanon. Strictly under Hezbollah control ..out of Lebanese political decision. Another move by Syria to control Lebanon under the watchful eye of Iran. Fun and games just beginning for the next decade of Lebanese the "monkey in the middle" hooror show.

    • 2 8