Israel must free Jewish terrorists to 'balance' Shalit deal, minister told Netanyahu
Haaretz goes behind the scenes of the stormy cabinet meeting that led to approval of the deal to secure the release of captive IDF soldier Gilad Shalit.
By Barak Ravid Tags: Gilad Shalit Shalit swap Benjamin Netanyahu Tamir Pardo Yoram CohenAside from debating whether or not to vote for a prisoner exchange deal that would set Gilad Shalit free, several members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet offered several lines of action Israel could take following the deal's execution.
Standing head and shoulders above most were Interior Minister Eli Yishai of Shas and his party member Meshulam Nahari, who said Israel should consider releasing Jewish terrorists who carried out attacks against Palestinians.
|
Eli Yishai and Benjamin Netanyahu in the Knesset. |
| Photo by: Emil Salman |
"It's the right thing to do as part of the balances in Israel's society," Yishai said, adding that such a move would not "undo the releasing of hundreds of [Palestinian] prisoners, but it may sweeten the bitter pill."
Other offers that came during Tuesday's dramatic cabinet meeting were to change Israeli law as to allow sentencing terrorists who had murdered Israeli citizens to death, thus increasing the legal deterrence against such acts.
Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor vehemently opposed the offer, saying: "I don't think we should be rushing toward extreme ideas."
Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who pushed for the completion of the prisoner swap deal in recent weeks, urged the establishment of a set government policy to deal with future abductions of Israelis.
"We need to change the rules from the ground up," Barak said, indicated that the "Americans, the British, and others formed regulations ahead of such eventualities, and I am sure some of them could fit us."
"I have formed a committee in the past, headed by [former Supreme Court] Justice [Meir] Shamgar, that recommended guidelines and it will be appropriate to deal with that issue the day after the deal is completed," Barak said.
Likud's Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz, who had also backed the Shalit deal, agreed with Barak, saying "such a dynamic must be prevented in the future."
"The kidnappings work against us as efficiently as tanks or missiles. See how many terrorists we are freeing now," Katz said.
Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon, who voted against the deal, also agreed that set rules need to be established in order to deal with future abductions.
'We have no choice', Netanyahu told ministers of Shalit deal
Netanyahu's quest to persuade cabinet ministers to accept the deal to secure the release of captive Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit continued behind closed doors on Tuesday. Once the television cameras left the conference room, Netanyahu opened with a fiery monologue, saying he had no choice but to go through with the deal.
For more than four hours on Tuesday night, Israel's government ministers sat to discuss the deal that would secure the release of Gilad Shalit - until it was finally approved by a large majority. During that dramatic meeting, all of Israel's security chiefs and almost all of the government ministers voiced their opinions.
"It is true that there are no promises that the prisoners released will not return to terror, but they are already leading terror activities from their prison cells," Netanyahu told the cabinet ministers.
"There are some countries that don't hold negotiations with kidnappers, and we can discuss this policy going forward, but in this particular case, this is something that we inherited from the previous government, and we do not have a choice," he said.
Netanyahu did not mention former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert by name, but placed the blame on him in a roundabout way. "This is a reality that was forced upon us from the moment the former government engaged in negotiations with Hamas," Netanyahu said.
"We could not pay the price, but if we want Gilad to come home, there is no other choice," the prime minister said, adding "in any case the deal is not the same as the original one drafted by Hamas."
In his closing statement, just moments before the ministers voted, Netanyahu claimed that the draft of the deal that his government received was better than the deal that was brought before Olmert's government two-and-a-half years ago.
"At the beginning I wanted to change a lot of things on the original draft, and I tried to turn things around," Netanyahu said. "In the end, we arrived at a better result than we did two years ago."
Minister Uzi Landau: Agreement 'great victory for terrorism'
From the start, it was obvious that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was backed by all of the security chiefs. The person who played a key role in convincing the ministers was Shin Bet security service director Yoram Cohen.
Cohen, who had been debating for a long time whether to support the deal or not, finally made his mind up a few weeks ago, and joined the head of Israel's negotiating team David Meidan in the last two rounds of talks in Cairo.
Cohen told the ministers that compared with past negotiations – both under former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and under Netanyahu – the Shin Bet had softened its stance.
"In the past, we didn't support the deal," Cohen said. He described the Shin Bet's efforts to minimize the security risks of releasing Palestinian prisoners. "It was like an equalizer in a stereo system," he said. "We inherited the framework of the deal and the game was with the tones – who would be deported, who would go back home and would be released with restrictions."
One of the government ministers asked Cohen if he recommended approving the deal. Cohen answered yes, a response that angered National Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau.
"You are a public servant," he told Cohen. "Your job is to provide data, not to recommend."
A few ministers responded to Landau and sided with the Shin Bet chief, but the officials most supportive of Cohen were his colleagues – IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz and Mossad chief Tamir Pardo.
"I send soldiers to battle, and it is my duty to share my professional position on the matter," Gantz said. "The deal is the only way. It is possible that we will encounter some of those released in future military activities, but according to our assessments we think releasing the prisoners is acceptable in terms of security."
Pardo also reacted strongly to Landau's statements. "I am in charge of combatants and I'm committed to them," he said. "It is my duty to say whether I am for or against, and the government will decide what it will. In this case, I am for the deal."
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
I am happy for the parents and friends of Gilad. But,.......as parents, i would ask myself....why this has taken MY government more than 5 years ....???!!!
-At least they have admitted there is such a thing...
there is a war on terror man was a prisoner of war he was military not civilian he was not a hostage the media conferred this status on him, the solution historically is repatriation on cessation of hostilities or prisoner swap if u hold cognoscenti as the media made shalit then u get more in return simple end of story
but that is posturing.the next kidnapping will be the same and we will feel the same way.we have to put in place hard rules.the leaders of hamas will no longer live after the next kidnapping
the only price that would be listened to is the life of gazan leaders would be forfeit.all of them.make this the rule.
mr.menacham begim of irgun/etzel went on to become PM the roots of the present state lie in terrorism against the british and arabs lest we forget,.
In such cases,maturity and responsobility must be the guide.At the one hand, you have the importance of the NATIONAL SECURITY and at the other a HUMAN LIFE.I hope the best for the young soldier.A friend from Greece.
Where Hamas can be sure they don't re-offend. Fair is fair.
I AM A JEW: because of either Jews or their GOD, obviously not possibly mine too, I AM the one who can't be Jewish and thus for the Rabbies not a Jew either. ÆND: either way or both ways it's your fault. ÆND: you[{L'L}] ALL END FIXING IT. YOU SEE?!!
that Israel is not exactly a stranger to kidnapcases itself. It just usually calls it arrests.
Not relevant - what does one have to do with the other EXCEPT that Shas is holding a bribery to its vote to allow Arab prisoners be an exchange for Gilad Shalit. I say, shame on Shas for being so nit-picky.
First, israel won the moral ground! Second, a lesson to be learned about it's cabinet members. Landau and Lieberman are faceless hard liners with no moral base and should resign forthwith! Thirdly, how many apartments can israel built by saving the cost of 1000 prisoners? Four, these prisoners are burned! They surely do not look forward to be eithr oiled or back to prison. Next time FOREVER!
about gilad shalit? it's like one israeli guy - and a soldier no less. as if men women and children weren't getting shot or bombed every month in gaza! what a media farce to have a special issue. nobody actually cares.
Cast Lead was not led from aprison cell.
Next will be a War when Natanyahu will say 'We had no choice but to wipe out the Terrorists "......
Generalissimo Rabin . The true legacy. No wonder his followers haven't dared to commemorate his death anniversary this year
Act instead of re-act Bibi - it's the sign of a real leader.
63 years of staggering from one bad decision to another and another. no law agency in the world with an atom of sense pays a ransom !
Uzi Landau sounds like a BULLY
Hamas is already saying they will kidnap additional people after the obvious sucess this deal brought them. The answer is simple. Don't capture terrorists in the future, jsut shoot them. Then there is no one in Israeli prisions to trade for. Of course the world would protest but Israel needs to figure out that it does not matter what they do the world will not like it anyway.
If u were to be Shalit,u wouldn't be talking like that.
Isn't he a public servant just like Cohen? Cohen should have an opinion.
And that continues to make Israel a formidable foe for its enemies.
... which is indirectly a plus for Israel as well... neighbors who are less sad and frustrated, are also better neighbors...
An Israeli soldier is coming home. That is always the number one priority. I don't beleive in negotiating with Terrorists. In this case there was no other option avail. This cabinet would not vote in favor of a military rescue mission. This decision making process must bring PM so much pain b/c his brother was a victim to terrorism many years ago. Does anyone really think PM wants those terrorists to hurt more persons? That is too absurd for words My heartfelt sympathy to all those who have lost loved ones to terrorism. I pray sergeant Schalit's freedom brings peace to all G-d Bless all soldiers fighting for freedom. Israel's POW is coming home
Israel should make prisoners only for intelligence, Otherwise, kill them immediately.
Were the choices today any different from the choices two years ago? Why does Netanyahu need such a wave of praise today? Does his image need bolstering? Has he been saving this card for maximum political usefulness?
... all on Palestinian West Bank territory... together with the joy of returning family members, the Palestinians might soon be confronted with the bitter brew of lost land...
Netanyahu is the only man in Israel is able to make peace with the Muslim’s world as long he draws the boarder-lines of Israel. The day he addressed the Muslim’s world, long time ago, to stop teaching their children to hate the Jews. He became the man to deal and wheel with. I hope the Muslim’s world have a leader who has the courage to address the Jewish nation of Israel in telling it that you Israel must also stop the hate against Islam.
with all of this talk of hamas's victory they just lost their headquarters in syria -- that's like losing tel aviv for israel. oh so they get 1000 prisoners, some of whom are deported, some of whom can never leave their towns in gaza... meanwhile israel upholds its ethics. "we don't negotiate with terrorists" was an israeli tactical invention, now they're trying a compromise; in the end israel is on the front lines and is doing best for its citizens, have faith in jewish perseverance.
trading for Shalit is NOT a victory for terrorism...allowing Hamas to Exist in GAZA is.
I am not relaxing until Gilad Shalit is home. The amount of puff, spin and CYA going on in Israel is mind boggling. "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." - Shakespeare
What a waste, 5 years and 1000+ terrorists, Israel h
Next time just exchange Landau for any soldier captured by Hamas
Abbas's UN bid has changed the landscape. We have to play ball or get out of the field.
was the pitiful Palestinian situation into a tragic one. And that's the truth and it's a shame.
hamas, in general, is weaker. the assad regime is crumbling. as a result, hezbollah is also weaker. iran is resorting to desparate measures. the deal for shalit was not "fair," but necessary. shalit's return will benefit israel's ability to make certain decisions. should any of the released terrorists attack israel, hamas leadership should be taken out regardless of what the present american administration thinks.
but we are jewish and so we had to bring him back.it is poetry against mathematics.poetry wins
Meantime,we await Gilad's reappearance ,in one piece,healthy,in good shape.. Another two weeks they said?? Agony............
I just pray that not you son get murderred nnow that BiBi cave to terrorism, btw my brother died while catching one of the guys releassed, shame on you!
Israel has to reinstate death penalty for the terrorists who murdered soldiers or had set bombs and killed civilians. When this is in effect then there will be no murderers to be exchanged for the kidnapped soldiers and the public will be much more in favor to release 1000 prisoners for one soldier knowing no murderer will be ever set free.
because what shahids, arab terrorists "martyrs" fear most.. is the death penalty. it's called the al-aqsa MARTYRS brigade -- you see why a death penalty isn't going to do shit? it's not about that. henry clay said it best, a good compromise is when both sides walk away unhappy -- the hamas did not get their top guys, israel had to release 1000 prisoners; but now that situation is off the negotiation table and peace talks / future compromise may be more available.
Is that those murderers, if set free, can kill again. It is not about them going to paradise, it is about preventing them to kill again. You have missed the point.
It was a Hamas move to counter Abbas. It was why there was a breakthrough this week; they saw the public support Abbas received and wanted a piece of the cake, so they showed flexibility.
And The Great Armchair Warrior Ganz will not "encounter terrorists in combat situation"-they don't combat,they place bombs in pizzeria,an another outlet he never visits. Yes,I'm also a Great Armchair Warrior-but I'm not like Ganz responsible for catastropy of the Lebanon War,it was Ganz who was Chief of Training of the IDf and the rot must have started then.
This deal is part of the overall deal being worked out by Washington in the guise of the Quartet. Israel will have to accept it, no buts.
all of these men have been warriors. they voted according to their conscience and according to information available to them--information not available to the average person. you need to keep in mind that hamas has already paid a very steep price for the shalit kidnapping.
His stint as the Miltary Attache in Washington-does it train to combat ?
cigarets. They are not good for you.
I wasn't aware that Ganz was an armchair warrior.. perhaps you know more than I ?? Let us wait and see shall we..I am not enamoured with the present tactic anyway..But 5 long years??? I will have to revisit the 2006 archives Incidently...It has always been follow the leader. i.e The big wigs ( generals ) go forth during a battle and shout FOLLOW ME.. It has been the norm from what I heard it said ..Have things changed now??..
like your friends used to do back in the forties. You even managed to apoint two of them in leading functions in the governemet. Shame on you for such a chutzpa
Hamas didn't pay that price. It was the innocent civilian population that paid that price